PGC – So far, every effort to slow down the Taliban advance in Afghanistan has met with little success. Since the US pullout, the Taliban have taken scores of cities, with much of the south of the country either under Taliban control or disputed territory.
As the Taliban roll forward, what’s not being reported on is all the human beings currently facing execution, torture, rape, for just being part of a family of one of the people who openly aligned with the the West, especially with Americans.
These people are being brutalized wherever the Taliban move in.
The American state made promises to a nation-state it should never made in the first place, promises that it would rebuild Afghanistan and turn it into a viable, prosperous state. But after it finally got a significant portion of Afghanis to go along with the plan, when things got rough, the Americans bolted, leaving behind families upon families of guilt-by-association who are now at risk of serious physical trauma, harm, and even death.
PGC – File this under, would you look at the proverbials on that guy, as Google decides, well, almost decided, to en an antitrust lawsuit against a plaintiff, Epic Games, by buying them out.
Epic Games filed documents that showed Google was contemplating buying out Epic Games for fear of its potential successful efforts to get around Google’s 30 percent commission charge. They knew if they closed the loophole, they were vulnerable to an antitrust lawsuit.
To prove that they are not a monopoly using monopolistic market advantage to coercively manipulate the market to control competition, Google almost decided to buy out Epic Games, in a move to expend its monopolistic market advantage AND silence competition at the same time.
Fortunately for all of humanity, the deal never went through.
While its ongoing feud with Apple is ratherwelldocumented, Epic Games is also in the middle of an antitrust complaint against Google over the removal of Fortnite from the Play Store. According to newly released court documents, Google at some point considered simply buying out the company in order to quash legal action.
In the documents, Epic claims that Google was afraid of Epic’s moves to dodge the 30% commission charged on payments through Google Play and offer Fortnite(and its very lucrative associated microtransactions) directly, quoting an internal document describing Epic’s plans as a “contagion” that could spread to other developers and platforms. In Epic’s own words:
Google has gone so far as to share its monopoly profits with business partners to secure their agreement to fence out competition, has developed a series of internal projects to address the “contagion” it perceived from efforts by Epic and others to offer consumers and developers competitive alternatives, and has even contemplated buying some or all of Epic to squelch this threat.
PGC – More evidence is emerging in the caves of Spain that Neanderthals were far more sophisticated than previous imagined. It has taken the species a long time to recover from its early stigmatization as being a brute caveman, a less intelligent and more face-boned version of we homo hom sapiens.
Now, we have evidence that Neanderthals may have engaged in creative arts maybe as much as 20,000 years before we homo homo sapiens did.
In the Caves of Ardales, which is located near Malaga, a southern Spanish City, researchers found red ochre pigment on stalagties within the caves that appear to be intentional in their patterning, suggesting these are the earliest evidence we have for any humanoid species creating something we can today call art.
As one who is in the upper 1 percent of the population in terms of the amount of Neanderthal DNA I possess, this fills me with pride as a fellow neanderthaller that our people are finally beginning to be recognized as the great people they were, and, through us, still are.
So that last sentence might have been a bit hyperbolic for theatrical reasons. Please don’t start any groups. But DO start thinking of the neanderthal maybe a little but less cavemaney that you did before (even though, yes, the findings are LITERALLY in caves).
Neanderthals may have been closer to our species of prehistoric modern human than previously believed after cave paintings found in Spain proved they had a fondness for creating art, one of the authors of a new scientific report said on Sunday.
Red ochre pigment discovered on stalagmites in the Caves of Ardales, near Malaga in southern Spain, were created by Neanderthals about 65,000 years ago, making them possibly the first artists on earth, according to the study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) journal.
Modern humans were not inhabiting the world at the time the cave images were made.
The new findings add to increasing evidence that Neanderthals, whose lineage became extinct about 40,000 years ago, were not the unsophisticated relatives of Homo sapiens they been long been portrayed as.
PGC – A Fairfax County Virginia School chose to feature children’s literature created by an organization called “Woke Kindergarten” called “Safe. By Ki.”
The video outlined all the things that made Ki safe, one of them was not having cops around. The video also implied everyone should work on making everyone else feel safe in pretty much every part of their lives.
The focus of most articles, such as the redstate article we reference to and link below, is on the book presentation characterizing a world without cops around as being unsafe. What disturbs me more is that the presentation has such a heavy emphasis on safety, and such an emphasis on stressing the moral imperative that everyone do their part to ensure everyone is always safe.
It’s difficult on its face to criticize a program teaching kids they should expect to feel safe when, to the majority of degrees, we kind of want our kids to have some level of feeling they are and should always feel safe. I would not, however, wish to teach my child is my moral imperative to assure everyone else is doing a good job making sure everyone else is safe. As you get older, safety goes far beyond what a chid could even imagine, and affects almost every potential type of human exchange on can imagine.
In the name of safety, we can keep certain books banned. In the name of safety, we can declare certain types of thinking a reflection on a reprobate cancer that must be destroyed.
In the name of safety, we can form committees that can declare in secret whose fit for the party and who might be a traito.
In the name of safety we Americans bombed the Middle East to Hell and back again and back to Hell again a few times over.
Any group promising safety whille demanding the safety monitors work to turn in those who don’t work for the safety of everyone (those classified as being human, a classification that will continue to get smaller and smaller as power concentrates) is headed to an authoritarian end. Never let them into the public schools for they hope to destroy the very republic these schools were allegedly created to preserve by transmitting the unity values of a diverse republic bounded by the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution.
PGC – As I have said in other articles covering CRT, there are aspects to CRT I myself am aligned with, but, at its core, CRT has a built-in assumption that ‘whiteness’ is a genetic culturality that is creating the evils of the world. No matter how you slice it, no matter the historical ‘evidence’ you might use to condemn a whole group of humans for merely being a certain genetic ethnicity, what you are proposing is flat out against egainst law and our existing constitution.
Watching public school teachers who choose to comply with the worst parts of CRT, the parts that condemn whole races of people for being born alone, has been disheartening to myself and probably many others, but some choose to stand up, some choose to resist, and, apparently, this woman, Stacey Deemer is one of those teachers.
The teacher is suing the Illinion School District claiming that teaching children that human beings who are born of a certain race are inherently racist is against the school district’s own equity policies, let alone against state and federal laws as well, in addition to being unconstitutional.
An Illinois teacher’s lawsuit claims her school district’s “equity” policies violate federal civil rights laws and the U.S. Constitution.
According to a Heritage Foundation report, the Southeastern Legal Foundation’s suit on behalf of teacher Stacy Deemar claims Evanston/Skokie School District 65 taught that “to be less white is to be less racially oppressive.”
It also taught that “white identity is inherently racist” and that “teachers who disagree with these principles are ‘racists.’
The Chinese Communist Party is once again showing up the DNC in efficiency after having launched a two-strike assault on the mega-corp in their midst, Alibaba.
Having observed the growing nation-state-sovereignty-challenging powers of megacorps of other lands, such as America and Europe, the CCP is now moving to hem in the growing corpostate-like powers of its own international gians, with Alibaba being tops on that list.
First they attacked them for legal violations, now, the party appears ready to allow the abuse the party long countenanced and protected to come to the surface, as Alibaba leaders are #metoo’d (can’t says that many of them don’t deserve it) out of the company in a bid that is most likely about getting out the non-party non-zealots and replacing them with CCP-approved leaders.
Alibaba has already been under scrutiny from the Chinese government. (File)
Shanghai:
Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba said on Sunday that it was cooperating with a police investigation into sexual assault allegations aired by a company employee.
A statement by Alibaba said the company also had suspended “relevant parties suspected of violating our policies and values,” asserting that it had a “zero-tolerance policy against sexual misconduct.”
Taiwan’s existence is imperiled without a nuclear deterrent it can directly control, but so too are Japan and South Korea vulnerable, because the US cannot be counted on as an ally over the long-haul.
Bill Collier, Predictive Analysis- Depending on the United States has left many a country floundering on the rocks as, when push came to shove, the US, thanks to its inherently flawed version of modern “democracy” with its wild and unstable swings fueled by shallow propaganda aimed at gullible voters, turns its back on old friends. The precipitous, chaotic US withdrawals from Afghanistan and Iraq, for instance, left almost all the locals who had collaborated with the Americans exposed and in danger, for instance.
The US withdrawal from Vietnam was capped by the now infamous photo of a US helicopter flying out a few escapees as the Viet Cong closed in. Not only did the US leave Vietnam chaotically, the US stopped supporting South Vietnam and allowed the Communist invasion to overtake their former allies, this after over 50,000 US service members perished in fighting FOR South Vietnam’s independence from the Communist Bloc.
As for Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, their status as Front-Line States against China and its aggresive communist imperialist leaves them vulnerable as soon as the US decides to sacrifice them or loses interest in their defense. Relying on the US nuclear shield or military presence, these three states would be extremely vulnerable on their own.
In the event China siezes Taiwan, which would likely be a lightening and overwhelming operation that would see the Chinese descend on their tiny neighbor en masse, both South Korea and Japan would be outflanked. If the US gives ground over Taiwan, a possibility given the collaborationist Democrats whose ideological sympathy is with Beijing, neither Japan nor South Korea would have an answer to Chinese aggression.
The only guarantee these states would have is to cooperate fully with one one another in a close alliance aimed at producing a nuclear deterrent. No matter what these states do, sans the US military presence they cannot muster enough conventional forces to stop a determined Chinese attack. Moreover, the balance of power will continue to turn against them. But with a nuclear deterrent and a willingness to use it, China would have to choice but to come to terms with their neighbors.
The knee-jerk opposition to the “proliferation of nuclear weapons”, mostly by states that have nuclear weapons, seems to equate “peace” with this effort. But nuclear weapons have not led to war and will not lead to war as mutual assured destruction keeps warlike intentions in check. The North Korean regime would already be gone but for the Chinese nuclear umbrella in the past while, today, even the Chinese are hesitant to replace the Kim family regime because North Korea has nuclear weapons.
It is possible, albeit not highly probable, that these three states have already secretly begun talks, if not technical efforts, to develop nuclear weapons. The problem is that the present South Korean leader, Moon Jae-in, and his Democrats, have largely favored a rapprochement with China over North Korea and, while this has not played a significant role in the upcoming election in March 2022, it may be reversed soon as the more conservative People’s Power Party is poised to win.
With South Korea roiled by scandals and led by a collaborationist Party, whose leftwing views comport with the “Chinese model”, the likelihood of South Korea joining a secret effort of this nature is slim. Indeed, the wonder of it all may also be the failure of Australia and New Zealand, the next targets if Taiwan falls and both Japan and South Korea are forced to concede ground, to develop their own nuclear weapons programs.
The cooperation of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea to obtain nuclear weapons would be a logical response to Chinese aggression, but if such a program were ever leaked prior to actualization, it would no doubt trigger a violent Chinese response which the US may feel they cannot morally counter. After all, China could claim such a program represents an existential threat to its regime and, in truth, if these three powers did go nuclear it could actually thoroughly and finally bottle China up in a manner that ensures its eventual economic collapse.
No power more than India has any more reason to support the nuclear arming of these three states. Indeed, in an extemely unlikely but not impossible scenario, India could decide to actually station nuclear weapons in Taiwan, unveiling them on the heels of some formal declaration by Taiwan of a sort of Independence. It is doubtful Tawain, which sees the eventual reunification of China under its form of government as its long-term goal, would concede its claims by declaring “independence”, but it could, with a nuclear umbrella, assert independence and regain formal recognition by some countries as the legitimate successor state to the Qing Dynasty, which it displaced in 1911-12.
It should be noted that the Chinese communist party has never won any free and fair election and only 1 in 16 Chinese actually belong to the Party, which won by force, backed by the Soviets, as Americans betrayed the Republic of China (RoC). The Communists took over by force in 1949 and have ruled by force since then. Never have the Chinese Communists won the popular vote in anything approaching any kind of free and fair elections.
The way the US betrayed the RoC, the way the US left South Vuetnam and abandoned its friends in Afghanistan and Iraq, leaving them to their fate, should serve as a warning to these front-line states that dependency on the Americans is a foolhardy plan.
The possibility is there that one or more of these states already has a very secret nuclear weapons program underway, but unless they do, and soon, the probability is that all three will eventually be made to bow before the spector of Chinese communist imperialism.
In the end, either these states will obtain a nuclear deterrent on their own or, eventually, they will be forced to come under the sway of China in some capacity and effectively lose their sovereignty.
Democrats control the Capitol in California and the GOP leadership have played the role of controlled opposition in what has become an authoritarian one-party regime. With the recall election against Governor Newsom, a rabid leftist Democrat, Republicans are once again poised to perpetuate the one-party rule while pretending to be opposition thereto.
According to an ABC10 News Poll, the recall effort against Governor Newsom, a rabid Democrat, some 51% of voters support recall, 40% are against recall, and 9% are undecided. But this is not good news for Republicans, who, while led by Larry Elder, present a divided front which is ensuring the top Democrat would take the race.
The breakdown is as follows:
27 percent — Kevin Paffrath (D) 23 percent — Larry Elder (R) 20 percent — Undecided 10 percent — John Cox (R) 5 percent — Kevin Faulconer (R) 4 percent — Caitlyn Jenner (R) 3 percent — Kevin Kiley (R)
Paffrath is a YouTube personality who stated in his campaign he would deploy the national guard to remove homeless camps which have been allowed to flourish around California. Not a typical Democrat, Paffrath is a real estate investor and landlord, known at one point as a “landlord influencer”, with a social media following of 1.68 million subscribers. If Paffrath, a native of Germany whose parents brought him to California when he was 18, and who lives in Ventura, CA, wins he would be the youngest governor ever. He would also run afoul of the hard left wing of the Democratic Party.
On the other hand, he is a fresh face and would allow the Democrats to replace an unpopular governor whose continued tenure has the potential of strengthening the GOP, especially in those few swing US House Districts where the GOP could, if it knew how to fight, get some pick-ups.
The recall election is scheduled for September 14, 2021 while the press in California remain firmly in the tank for Governor Newsom. The pretend act that they are journalists and not merely political hacks working in lockstep to keep Camifornia under a one-party authoritarian regime isn’t wearing well as all their preachments against the recall have failed to sway public opinion their way. Even in the absence of any fair and equitable coverage of news, balanced by representing all Californians other than the hard left, the public appears, at least in this case, to be diverging from the rabidly partisan “press” establishment.
Meanwhile, the Republican Party, which has demonstrated an amazing fecklessness in the face of many assaults on political freedom by the Democratic Party, has refused to endorse a single candidate and create a united front giving them a fighting chance to take the governorship.
As the GOP field is led by Larry Elder who garners overall 23% support by all voters, it is not surprising the mostly all white GOP establishment opted not to endorse a candidate. The issue isn’t Larry Elder’s race, he is a Black man, the issue is the moral weakness of the Party establishment which is unfit to fight any battle against Democrats or against the onslaught against freedom.
Between them, Republicans have over 55% of the vote, a stunning number, with 20% of voters undecided, but thanks to a lack of unity, it would appear the GOP have once again snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. The closest GOP comeptitor to Elder, however, has 10% of the vote, far behind “undecided” at 20%, but the GOP leadership has abdicated the field, on a blatant display of just how much of a “controlled opposition” the Party is.
While the GOP establishment claim their focus is on the recall “question 1” which is to say yes to recall the governor, their tactical response only serves the Democrats, who themselves may wish to recall the unpopular governor and get a second chance with a fresh face. It is almost as if the GOP made a deal with Democrats to replace the unpopular governor with another Democrat as the leadership prevent a unified front from coming together to ensure a win for Republicans.
Regardless of what rank and file Republicans want, with the majority clearly behind Elder, the GOP leadership are playing a different game which has nothing to do with defeating Democrats and everything to do with keeping the status quo.
Only 24% of California voters are registered Republicans, a number that exposes the incompetence of the Party which hasn’t even made a serious effort to close the gap by reaching out to other communities of people, and their concerns and issues, outside their white base. Inviting people into the fold from diverse backgrounds and ethnicities as equals, and dignifying their needs and aspirations, has never occured to the leaders of this moribund Party.
The Party bigwigs voted 90% to not endorse any candidate and then pat themselves on the back claiming that if they endorsed any one candidate “some voters might stay home.” This is misdirection meant to put a happy face on the cowardice of the Party or, worse, their instinctive recoil at seeing a non-white head their effort, even if he has the best chance to win and even if most rank and file Republicans are behind him.
If the poll holds, Democrats will have used Republican money and efforts to remove an unpopular governor and give them a chance to replace him with a young and more palatable face which ensures they hold on to power.
Socializing inside a Freedomist Club may not seem like a path to liberation and prosperity, but connecting with people just as committed to freedom as you is actually very useful and perhaps even necessary.
The main idea of a Freedomist Club is that it would be a physical space, as opposed to just virtual, where club members gather for social activities, for collaboration on freedom building projects, and to practice some form of mutual self-reliance. While much can be done virtually, there are things in person we can do to make connections that are difficult online. Moreover, having a social life you can enjoy with others who share your love for this country and our freedom is a refreshing change from watching fake news or arguing with woke communists online.
As we gather people and gain resources, one of our hopes is to create a charter/licensing program that allows Freedomists to get together locally and form their own Freedomist Club for mutual support, social activities, and, of course, freedom building activism in their own community. We believe Freedom must go on the offensive, albeit through peaceful and legal means and by winning hearts back to America’s true manifest destiny.
This true and God-given manifest destiny involves the deliberate creation of a free and pluralistic society of equals which includes every citizen and organically builds up an American identity that truly transcends race or anything that divides us and that is itself rooted in our Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights. While we insist the underlying core ideology of America is the spiritual constitution of our four core ideals as understood from a Judeo-Christian worldview, our free and pluralistic society is by no means limited to Jews, Christians, and people who may be non-religious but who embrace a Judeo-Christian worldview.
A Freedomist Club would potentially do the following:
1. It would be a social gathering place, with either an on-site restaurant that also serves alcohol or a lodge-type social quarters where people bring their own items
2. It would both include a library dedicated to American history and the history and philosophy of freedom and engage in public outreach to educate people and truly revive within them a love for freedom and respect for human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing that the woke communists and other authoritarians lack
3. It would conduct a campaign to secure a majority of voters, regardless of Party, who agree to not vote for any candidate or office-holder who does not support the Bill of Rights in their most generous interpretation, according to a high standard of original spirit and intent, and for the benefit of every single American citizen of every demographic, class, or wherever they live
4. It would operate a local people-powered free press using the RAWE News Model to be a resource, to be an advocate, to be a watchdog, and to do so in an entertaining and educational manner
5. It would create a Caucus of all local citizens who signed the Freedomist Pledge within the Club’s Meeting Hall to engage in discourse, make resolutions, and issue instructions and remonstrances to elected officials and anyone with a public trust, promising a boycott of their business/organization or a vote against them for not taking heed
5. Its members would agree, and form smaller groups for mutual support, to always have each other’s back in upholding their fellow member’s rights, persons, and property from all hazards and abuse by any entity, public or private, foreign or domestic- they would cancel the cancel culture
These Clubs would do many other things as well, as many as members can connect through their own collaboration and engagement with one another and as we, through The Freedomist website, email list, and Freedomist groups within our new platform (Upadaria), share ideas and insights from other groups.
We desire to see these Clubs at some level operating in every US County of more than 5,000 people and to see 3 or more within every single US Congressional District. Each Club will have the national legal and logistical support of a nationwide network so that in extremely unfriendly areas our members would be free to operate and broadcast their message, in accordance with the Bill of Rights.
Freedom must take the offensive in every US Congressional District and every town and village or city neighborhood where we can gather, organize, and mobilize fellow Americans as freedom builders. To do that, we must move from virtual to local, using the virtual to connect millions of people across vast spaces and also to connect local people who then meet and collaborate in face-to-face gatherings.
The war on freedom is decades long and the battles we must now fight to reverse this and begin building freedom in our lives, families, and communities must occur over many years even as we also fight larger scale battles to build freedom in our Counties and States as well as the whole country in all of its institutions.
Like Reagan, our goal is to peacefully end this long “cold civil war” between woke communism and American freedom, our goal is to vanquish the woke communists and replace them, through peaceful use of electoral, social, and free market processes, with freedom loving Americans who put this country before some alien ideology of power and control.
We aim to vanquish the woke communists, not just slow down their deconstruction of this country into a third-world totalitarian hellscape, a mass of undifferentiated beings without gender, family, or faith who are led around by nose at the hands of a power-made ruling class.
We want nothing less than to win over our fellow Americans to the cause of freedom and to make everything associated with this woke communist cancel culture authoritarianism absolutely baneful in the eyes of most everyone in every demographic and every locale in this land. Our aim is the total liberation and freedom from authoritarianism and even poverty for every single American citizen in this land.
We desire a free, pluralistic, prosperous, safe, and happy America built around such staples of civilization as family, faith, community, and a totally free and just marketplace of goods and ideas (all on a strictly voluntary basis) where nobody is left behind.
Freedom will win and enlightment will overcome deception and lies because no human or natural power on this earth can forever prevent the eternal universal laws of causality (the laws of Creation) from operating in their full effect. Freedom and enlightment are the elevated state of humanity in God’s ordained plans, bondage and deception stem from a sin nature inherited like a curable disease from our first ancestor, Adam.
The laws of Creation all bend toward a movement and evolution in the direction of freedom and enlightment: people and whole civilizations that remain willfully locked in bondage and lies will experience the consequences of defying the laws of Creation. When an old civilization becomes mired in the sin nature and its proclivity toward bondage and deception it fails and in its failure it causes widespread destruction and harm to anyone who remains dependent upon its structures and institutions.
Our focus is not on the sin nature, the fact our present civilization has become mired, or the coming catastrophic upheaval that will wreck this civilization over the next decades. Our focus is on another outcome that attends the collapse of old civilizations: namely the emergence of a new civilization from within and outside the borders of those lands dominated by that old civilization.
Those who embrace the new, if indeed the new is based on the ideals of freedom and enlightment which come from our elevated state, find ways to escape the negative consequences of the old civilization’s moral and spiritual collapse and, if enough people embrace this, can help entire lands and nations of people transition peacefully from old to new!
We can see the future by understanding the cycles of history and seeing both where we have been and where we are going. We can see what is possible and what is inevitable. We can see the present civilization is in rapid moral and spiritual decline and yet we can also see the emergence of the new civilization.
The four core ideals of the new civilization include a Judeo-Christian understanding and balanced application of Unity in diversity, Popular sovereignty, Democratic equality, and Rule of law. These are not ideological platitudes! If you understand both their inner harmony, like “Democratic” versus “equality” and “Unity” versus “diversity”, and their interdependence with each other, like how each ideal is balanced by the others, you arrive at a disciplined approach to action, interaction, lifestyle and governance that is guided by wisdom to produce mutually and individually beneficial results.
The application of these core ideals of the new civilization, which alone is guided by four core ideals and not just one, opens doors and enables you to navigate life, relationships, and scaled-up associations with others in a profitable and stable manner. Every civilization is based on their own version of one, possibly more than one, of these ideals: they are the essential ideals of human civilization itself.
Those who properly understand these ideals from a holistic and people-centered perspective, with the aim being to harmonize with God’s standards of righteousness and justice for the nations, can more effectively build freedom on an organic and emergent basis with minimal top-down centralized control. We would say that without fully understanding these ideals en toto your methods and processes will struggle to produce freedom within a franework of righteousness and justice and on a purely freewill participatory basis.
The four core ideals are not our answer to racialist/racist systems, like nazism or identitarianism, nor to right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism.
The symbol for these ideals, the Upadarian Cross, is in many ways seen as the antithesis of the swastika or the hammer and sickle, but only because its invention came after these hateful symbols became infamous.
The two lines that cross each other and form a cross, one with hashes on its end and one without, represent diverse individuals or groups intersecting and connecting. The surrounding diamond represents the four core ideals which gives them organic cohesiveness without violating their individual spiritual sovereignty, their shared regency, or self-determination, in freewill participation with one another. This cross represents the idea that all human beings are created equally in God’s image and are owed respect and protection for their human dignity, human rights, and human flourishing by any society deeming itself righteous and just. Tolerance, respect, righteousness, justice, equality, and equity are the catchwords of the Upadarian lifestyle and governance discipline.
We prefer to say that the Upadarian cross represents the core ideals for a just and righteousness civilization, one that is fully based on freewill participation and not coercion. These ideals predate the baneful totalitarian and/or racist ideologies, and so we recoil at the notion the Upadarian cross is somehow our “response” to the swastika: the racist swastika is a counterfeit symbol rooted in hate that is a response to God’s love, it is the anyithesis of justice and equity, these things, as represented by the Upadarian cross, aren’t the antithesis to nazism, communism, racism, or totalitarianism!
Put another way, the Upadarian Cross represents core ideals that are fundamental to a just and righteous society based purely on freewill participation, while symbols like the swastika and the hammer and sickle are the antithesis to the Upadarian cross!
Whoever uses the Upadarian cross is affirming their love and respect for humanity as beings created equal in God’s image and is committed to tolerance, acceptance, and respect for the human dignity, human rights, and human flourishing of all other human beings on this planet. The Upadarian Cross is the symbol of the new civilization which we envision emerging in this world on a purely freewill participatory basis, that is, by people and voluntary groups or intentional communities, adopting these ideals as their standard of self-governance.
If you see something like Democratic equality and you think this means “majority rule” or “equal wealth distribution”, then your understanding lacks balance and harmony. This doesn’t mean you aren’t smart or noble, it is just what has been crammed down your throat without being shown the inner harmony of this ideal, its Judeo-Christian roots, or its understanding in light of the need to balance it with the other ideals. What is also lacking is an understanding how this and the other ideals can and should be used on an individual basis and within strictly voluntary groups and communities, instead of as a political buzzword that had no real value in everyday life!
The four core ideals are a blueprint for building freedom in your own life, relationships, and associations and by studying their deeper meaning, inner harmony, Judeo-Christian roots, and balance with each other, you begin to form a proper, balanced mechanism for mutual support and advancement that has no peer. If two or more people make these core ideals, again with their inner harmony and in balance with each other, the guide for their conduct, standards, and norms, they will tend to produce good results for all concerned.
Indeed, even if you simply use these ideals to make smarter decisions, once you learn and internalize them, your decision-making will improve and your habits will begin to organically enhance your life instead of dragging you down and holding you back.
Like the four core ideals, the Upadarian Cross stands firmly against things like racialism, racism, bigotry, intolerance, exploitation, and authoritarianism. But more than standing against these things, the four core ideals and the Upadarian Cross stand FOR the advancement of equitable and just freedom for all human beings, without exception.
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
