PGC – It looks like the Taliban are set to take full control of Afghanistan and once again become a world player on a world stage with a whole nation-state behind them that will have nation-states like China and Russia coming in to try and get a little piece of the action. China, for sure, has, for now, the inside track, but that could turn after a couple of years of Chinese presence in the land where Empires die.
Donald J Trump was heading us down this path as well, but one does not know how much different, if at all, his withdrawal would have been. Our withdrawal appears to be sudden and unmerciful. We are knowingly leaving behind hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people with more than enough positive interactions with our soldiers to put their families under threat for death, slavery, or worst, sex slavery.
We knew full well what the Taliban was and its highly coercive assumptions regarding the nature of human governance. For the Taliban, their religious leaders are like little gods, or at least manifestations of the wisdom of Allah, that speak with infallibility, leaders willing to consign to death anyone who dares not believe in the particular Allah this group holds at its heart.
Life is not much among those not of the orthodox faith of the Taliban, and we Americans knew it, but we left, hardly with any plan to evacuate hardly anyone that put their lives, their families lives at risk to cooperate wtih the Americans, to even enter some of their programs, to dare dream one day something like America will happen in Afghanistan, and there will be no more bombs, no more Taliban, only open squares to argue about non-essential politics.
Even here in America, though, those days are fast ending, but still, compared to the people of Afghanistan, we are still a golden light of free thought and action, ideally, yes, but also physiologically still significantly true as well. America is hope and wonder compared to the conditions that Afghanis found themselves under while America was there. Now that America has left, well, for many, this is the end. Life itself will be over, and it will end violently for many of them. Many will be beaten, taunted, paraded around in cages. Some will be beheaded. Some will be burned alive. Some will be raped until they die.
The methods of death set aside for these American sympathizers, well, it’s pretty ghastly, and we knew it, and we left without any real effort to rescue those who once rescued us. This withdrawal has done more damage to America’s credibility, gravitas on the world stage than all of the little ways we have been letting down our allies through the second part of the 20th and early part of the 21st Centuries have combined. It might even be the culmination of this period in American geopolitical history, and it might mark the end of it, an age when America commanded the moral high ground, but now, after Afghanistan, can no longer be trusted as an ally in a risky situation.
Taliban fighters could isolate Afghanistan’s capital in 30 days and possibly take it over in 90, a US defence official told Reuters on Wednesday (Aug 11) citing US intelligence, as the resurgent militants took control of an eighth provincial Afghan capital.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that the new assessment of how long Kabul could stand was a result of the rapid gains the Taliban had been making around the country as US-led foreign forces leave.
“But this is not a foregone conclusion,” the official added, saying that the Afghan security forces could reverse the momentum by putting up more resistance.
The extremists now control 65 per centof Afghanistan and have taken or thre
PGC – Corpo-Woketarianizm is riding into power under the rainbow flag, billing itself as the champion for the cause of the generationally-oppressed homosexual. The suffering is real and the stigmatiztion of homsexuality and non-heterosexual expressions is a continuing issue for folks that are parts of these communities. Corpo-woketarianz offer this group a mix of revenge and utopion justice through a process of assuring that not one human is left viable in our society that dares believe homosexuality is anything but stunning and brave, and something to be celebrated over almost everything else you could posibly imagine.
I saw this coming from far awar, from years away, and, for years, I chose not to attack so directly this corpo-woketarianizm as it began to emerge. I chose to be silent for fear of enabling what backlash might come should I fight against the improper, unjust use the real suffering of real people to coercive others and break down standards that protect all those in disadvantage from those in advantage, mainly and specifically the standards we find in our American Bill of Rights.
The Corpo-Woketarianz are telling the non-heterosexual-exclusive communities that their family and friends and neighbors are all potentially expendable if they hope to live in Corpowoketarianztopiaz. Speaking out against them does, in fact, or at least in part, embolden actual bigots, actual racists, actual oppressors who used a lot of very recent subhumanizing contstructs to eliminate vast swathes of people from consideration on par with being a fellow human like themselves.
Case in point might be seen in Ghana, who sees the aggressive use of “Gay Rights” by Copowoketarianz Inc all around them, and they react by trying to shut out the gays, legislate away the gays, subhumanize them once again, and assure they stay there. This is a natural reaction to a perceived, now not entirely unjustified perception, threat from within if they ’embolden’ this community.
The community, my friends, is not the issue, nor is sexuality itself. Homsexuality, bisexuality, let the humans sort that openly in consensual frames, then all of the arguments might be put to rest and we will see what a people within the whole people of human (of which we all belong) can do if given the space to simply be fellow humans with the rest of humanity.
While coercive acceptance is never acceptable, nor is social shunning of non-acceptance, coervive non-acceptance is not acceptable within our Bill of Rights frame. We humans, as we come to understand more and more who we are in all our variations, must, within a pluralistic democratic republic limited by a Bill of Rights based constitution, assure that our variations are given civil, public space, in comerce and trade, in government, full access to a society and full and equal standing with the whole of society.
So long as your beliefs, your habits of being do not directly threaten to coerce others who have not first attempted to directly coerce you, then a pluralistic land must assure that variations be given their open space to become what they might become without social vilification and state limitation. While it is easy to understand where the powers that be in Ghana might be tempted to put thousands of lives at risk of significant destabiliaztion and trauma, this is not of the spirit of justice in a land of liberty.
This countervaling ‘baclash’ is one I fear here in America, and as a loved one and friend of multiple people that fall outside the category of heterosexual-exclusive, my love for them and my fear for their potential well-being leads me away from such draconian reactions to a very real threat, the use of the cause of the homosexual, or any other disenfranchised group, as a powderkeg built on promises of revenge and utopian deliverance, all to turn into distopian infighting over the scraps you still hold, if you end up on top in the end at all.
The dynamic of multiple sexual dimensions in human society is a process we have yet to fully understand, and we never will if we don’t give equal space to those that fit outside the orthodox frames. But it is a process that must begin on equal footing, and a process that limits its actions to respect to the bills of rights of all. It’s a messier process, but one that will produce genuine shifts in human understanding, not aped behavior that papers over simmering hate waiting to explode should the shackles come off.
That last path is the one the Corpowoketarianz are leading us down, but we need not respond by heading down the path to Ghana. In a lot of ways, we won’t, if we wish to preserve an American democratic republic limited by a Bill of Rights Based Constitution that enables our true diversity to co-exist peacefully and prosperously despite all our myriad of differences.
The greatest beacon Americans can hold right now is the beacon of the Bill of Rights, but you must hold it and honor it for all, no matter their belief or political persuasion. If the least of us is not free, the best of us is a slave owner of the rest of us.
United Nations human rights experts have called on the Ghanaian government to reject the proposed ‘family values’ bill currently before Parliament because it seeks to establish a system of State-sponsored discrimination and violence against the LGBTQI community. The first reading of the bill was done on August 2, 2021. Consideration of the bill is expected to be done in October 2021.
In a press release copied to ghanabusinessnews.com, the independent experts, appointed by the Human Rights Council, presented an analysis of the draft bill to the Ghana government, concluding that adopting the legislation in its current or any partial form would be tantamount to a violation of a number of human rights standards, including the absolute prohibition of torture.
The experts describe the draft legislation which argues that any person who deviates from an arbitrary standard of sexual orientation or gender identity is immediately to be considered dangerous, sick or anti-social, as a textbook example of discrimination.
“The proposed law promotes deeply harmful practices that amount to ill-treatment and are conducive to torture, such as so-called ‘conversion therapy’ and other heinous violations like unneces
PGC – The consequence of insisting that there is no real physiological difference between men and women is that eventually women will be expected to do the same things that men are expected to do,, not just that men are expected to do some of the things women are currently expected to do,
One of the duties of men in most societies throughout human history is to be the ones that die first when the lands come under attack. We send the men to protect the women, the children, the elderly, and those not able to fight. It’s not a western thing, it’s not a white thing, it’s an almost near-universal thing, For better or worse, this is the overwheming tradition of humanity.
Now, as the narrative becomes the institutions, as the theoretical assumption that there are no real physiological differences between male and female become instutitions and change existing institutions, it is only a matter of time before that society expects women to face the physical threat of any potential enemy in the same way as the man, despite the fact that she is not nearly physiologically equipped for such a task and would be broken even if she survived the war.
GOP Senators are trying to either pre-emptively cut off the eventual drafting of women in the military or grandstanding a threat that might not, yet, be credible. As a DNC-held Senate Committee recently passed an amendment that would do just that, make women eligible for the draft, perhaps this is more the former than the latter.
A coalition of Republican senators is taking a stand against requiring women to register for a draft, saying in a proposed resolution the concept would harm military readiness.
U.S. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and five other GOP senators introduced the resolution on August 5 after a Democratic-controlled committee passed an amendment that would force women to register with Selective Service, making them eligible to be drafted into war. Under current law, only men must…
PGC – Marriages in England and Wales are on the decline, specifically heterosexual marriages. The rate goes significantly lower when one factors in marriages that had a religious ceremony attached to it.
We now have a case study in the “West” to see what happens to societes who lack a traditional marriage a, by extension, family structure. This is not a case of different forms of marriage co-existing with traditional heterosexual marriage, this is a case of heterosexual marriage becoming something of an endangered species, and thus no longer a primary driver of institutional forming in society. What happens when you remove that equation from a complex civilization that has the power of artificial intelligence and drones that kill autonomously at its disposal?
If we are right about the stabilizing factoring of fathers and mothers raising children, then a society without such social constructs, we suspect, will become increasingly sexualized at increasingly lower ages as the authority of parenting itself becomes questioned, and finally hardly considered. The state itself will decide the potential options for the child, and will make sure the child has been fooled into believing whatever moral construct it wishes to create to justifty the coercion it requires to continue to protect its own lies.
Homosexual marriage and family can co-exist with heterosexual marriage and family, but society cannot long survive where heterosexual marriage is to become vilified, as it appears to have already taken place in England and Wales. Now we watch as their world becomes the proof of life of a variety of competing theories regarding the soundness of seeking to destroy traditional marriage and family constructs.
The number of heterosexual couples getting married in England and Wales and those opting for a religious ceremony have fallen to their lowest levels on record.
Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that there were 234,795 marriages in England and Wales in 2018, down 3.3% on the year before and the lowest since 2009.
Marriage rates for opposite-sex couples in 2018 were the lowest on record, with 20.1 marriages per 1,000 unmarried men and 18.6 per 1,000 unmarried women……
Figures also suggest fewer people are opting for the traditional church wedding, with only around a fifth (21.1%) of heterosexual couples in 2018 choosing a religious ceremony – the lowest on record….
“The divorce rate is at its lowest level in 30 years, suggesting those who get married are much more likely to stick together and marriage remains the most stable form of relationship, especially when you factor in children.”
PGC – For a long time, the governments of the West seemed to openly concede the whole digital social media space to the rest of the world, and nation-states such as China and Russia entered into the fray with great enthusiasm and, more importantly, more direct capital investments, training and housing armines of social media operatives to tilt the narrative balance in the favor of their particular interests.
The battle for the hearts and minds of humanity is becoming more and more centered around what emanates from that device we should hardly even call a phone at this point.
Perhaps because early on the platforms themselves were predominantly American and secondarily European when the phenomenon first rose, governments of the West reiled on the national origin of the platforms to assure that whoever was operating that platform would protect the interests of the nations of their origin. Perhaps early on that might have been the case, before social media become the lucrative cash cow that it has now become, before it became the fundamnetal filter of ‘legitimate news’ for the vast majority of humans on this planet, especially in certain countries such as China, the United States, and Russia.
Now, social media is beholden to a world empire that lives outside the parameters of the nation-states they come from, and they have offices in almost every country in the world, and every country will protect their physical assets should citizens rise up in rebellion against it. It’s a strange relationship in that one, social media, relies on physical protection from the other, the host nation-state, but the other, the host nation-state, also relies on social media for ese of control. It’s an uneasy partnership, one fraught with many attempts to sabotage and usurp the other as families derive their power still largely from the new wealth, social media, or the old, political business partnering.
In this backdrop, the state itself is vulnerable to the de facto world empires it hosts, especially where the bulk of its commerce and public discourse is taking place, centralized, easy to track, easy to understand, predict, manage. It’s a hard easy button to walk away from, even when that button might also work to undermine your very sovereignty for one of its host nations, or potential host nations, offers more gold in exchange for its controlling services.
So now the Unted States and other Western European nations are about ready to test the loyalty of the social media empires that have physical space in your lands. Facebook, will you protect America from her enemies? It could be as simple as that, but not likely. It will be offering contracts to these social media companies to train American social media soldiers to combat the Chinese and Russians alone, and then the nudge to suggest they also make sure the American trolls get preferential treatment.
Richard Gwilliam of British geospatial intelligence company Geollect, says that Western militaries have been “caught on the hop” by Russia and China and are only now beginning to think seriously about how to exploit masses of freely available data.
“Russia and China have been absolutely superb on asymmetric warfare — we’re playing catch-up.”
“What Russia and China have done is, instead of just competing with us on platform warfare, they’ve been absolutely superb on asymmetric warfare — we’re playing catch-up,” Gwilliam said.
He cites cyberattacks, misinformation and interference around Brexit and the Trump election as examples where Russia and China have successfully manipulated everyday tech like social media to destabilise the US and Europe.
The US Navy recently sent one of its stellar aircraft carriers into the lion’s den, the strike of the so-called ‘ship-killer’ missiles. The USS Gerald R Flord withstood a series of attacks by ship killer missiles to demonstrate the resilance of US Aircraft Carriers against such threats that enemies such as China and Russia claim they have against us.
The aircraft carrier is still, even in current year, the apex predator of miliitary power and there is still no one close who can field the quality and amount of aircraft carriers that the United States can still sustain. By putting their aircraft carrier through such tests, the US Military just displayed a powerful visual rebuttal to the seriousness of the threat the Chinese and Russians thought they possessed.
After surviving beyond the percussive power of the so-called ship-killer missiles, the US Carrier proved itself still the apex predator of the seas. So long as America holds that title, the power of all nation-states in the physical is considerably limited compared to the United States, whose power resides now almost entirely in her far superior Navy, which starts with her Aircraft Carrier Task Forces, which project real physical power like nothing else human-made on the face of the planet.
If and when the Aircraft Carriers become moot, the reality of power of this planet will be signficiantly re-aligned in ways that might be difficult to prognosticate, but, most likely, it leads to a more disbursed power structure than we currently have today, but also increased local production and manufacturing due to rising cost of internataional shipping with rise in piracy worldwide. The death of the carrier might, in the end, potentially lead to less disparity in power signficiantly compared to where we are today where so many of our large-scale systems continue to merge with others until we are down to a handful of major corporations and governments dictating the reality to the overwhelming majority, and not in their interest, in the interst of those who find themselves advantaged in power in the first place.
The US Navy’s successful completion of explosion impact trials for aircraft carrier the USS Gerald R. Ford has sent a message to China and Russia that it is not worried about
The US’ newest and most advanced nuclear carrier’s third and final full ship shock trial was completed on Sunday off the coast of Florida, following the previous such trials on June 18 and July 16, the American navy said in a press release on Monday.
The carrier suffered no major casualties and less damage than expected, officials said.
In the trials, held in the Atlantic Ocean, 40,000lbs (18 tonnes) of explosives – equivalent to a 3.9-magnitude earthquake – were detonated under water, each time taking place closer to the carrier. Data on the impact on the vessel was collected.
The factitious is the percieved crafted, human-made (though nature produces facticiousness in and of itself as well).
The factitious is the illusion of certain knowing, high craft of material or thought that creates a magical barrier between the roots of its craft and your capacity to see these roots.
Without the perception of the cogs behind the veneer, the veneer becomes an eternality that takes us out of our own path of knowing outside the frames of what the world around us coercively works to have us believe. to presuppose without even being aware of the fundamental existentially defining decisions about the nature of self and material that have been made by the frames of potential being we were born into.
These frames of being are overwhelmingly the result of strategic coercive action targeting certain key demographics of thought and physicality, with the goal of preserving and/or extending the base of power for select individuals competing with the resources that hundreds of millions of humans can provide to the victors.
Throughout history, these frames have been built to harvest from tens, then thousands, then hundred thousands, then millions. At this point, we are building frames that are intended to capture billions in similar potential ranges of action with particular limitations on the potential for direct apex existential pursuit (the pursuit of being the is, was, and always will be of perceived peak existentiality as perceived by an audience of non-selves.
Overwhelmingly, it is the words that reflect the reality of power, not just in what is said but in what is not allowed to be said.
Breaking the factictious mezmerization still is a goal of mine, but to do it withoutb breaking the utility of shared semantic frames.
If conservatives crave freedom and order with a nod to traditional moral norms, liberals crave justice and equality with a nod to future progress and societal evolution. But whenever either side wins an election victory and their party gains power, the promises that motivated their vote fail to materialize.
Beyond lip service and using those promises as a blanket to cover other things, the politicos dance to the tune played by the uber rich ruling class. We can see now how the Democrats in claiming to be champions of things like justice, equality, and societal progress are mostly just delivering more government control and more crony kickbacks to their corporate masters. When in 2016 the shoe was on the other foot, Republicans delivered more government control and crony kickbacks to their corporate masters while soundbiting all about freedom and order and preserving our traditiona and values.
What we call “upadarianism” is no synthesis of conservative and liberal ideologies as such, but it does seek to address and advance many of the aspirational desires and valid concerns associated with these two main camps. On one hand conservatives may deny the lack of justice and equality some demographics suffer in this country. On the other hand liberals tend to be all too willing to sacrifice freedom for all in order to rectify the injustice suffered by some. Conservatives sometimes recoil at the ideas of progress and societal evolution and see change itself as bad while liberals seem to regard everything from the past as inherently suspect and even execrable in a really irrational manner.
The upadarian ideology, if we have to even use the word “ideology”, is really an ideational framework of ideals, principles, and practices which lead to good governance and a positive and forward-looking lifestyle. It is not rooted in or confined by the ideological straitjackets of left or right. The goal is to apply both God’s standards of righteousness in the form of freewill participation between people who consent thereto and God’s standards of justice to ensure a pluralistic, free, equitable, and prosperous society that nurtures every person without favor or prejudice.
If we desire anything for civilization it is to ensure a free and pluralistic society of equals who enjoy freedom and who may all prosper in peace and happiness through their own individual choices in terms of their own actions and the forms of freewill participation they desire to engage in.
What marks upadarianism as unique in many regards is that most of its “program” is entirely voluntary and can be carried out through freewill participatory associations of some kind and yet government, which includes the magisterial authority, is not necessarily seen as a “necessary evil” but a potential positive good. We challenge and deny the notion the 17th century concept of nation-state defines what the magisterial authority could be, but we see the magisterial authority as essentially good and beneficial when it is governed by the right ideals.
Upadarianism is based on a Judeo-Christian understanding and balanced, holistic application of the four core ideals of what we consider the next advancement in the form of a new civilization. These ideals include Unity in diversity, Popular sovereignty, Democratic equality, and Rule of law. They form the initials UPDR, hence “UPaDaRianism.”
Without getting too deep in their meaning, these ideals resonate with the inner harmony of a civilizational framework that nurtures and values every person and encourages the development and exercise of their spiritual sovereignty as individuals so that each can find and follow God’s best for their lives without artificial limits.
Unlike “ideologies”, upadarianism, sometimes spelled UPDRism, has its starting point and primary focus on individuals and freewill participatory associations of free people pursuing and actualizing its ideals, principles, and practices unilaterally and voluntarily. Upadarianism isn’t about shaping the broader society to suit our beliefs, values, and convictions. It is about shaping a legal and civil ecosystem that simply allows people who desire to use this lifestyle and governance self-disciplinary philosophy and way of life to its maximum effect without undue external interference or artificial limits.
The inner harmony between left and right appears as we get to the root of the rank and file person’s true motivations and realize both want things that are actually positive overall for society. Where these desires become a trap and an excuse to enhance the ruling class at everyone else’s expense is when they become slogans without meaning and justification for vilification and for making government more powerful at the expense of both freedom and justice.
The common thread of corruption of the more pure and noble ideas of left and right is that they depend on electoral victories and a return to power of the other party, the one not in power but who will allegedly save them from the party on power. Even for those who tactically vote against a party to forestall the agenda of the party in power, there is a sense emerging among a very few that this isn’t really forestalling the limitations on freedom nor advancing justice and equity.
Few liberals or conservatives are willing to find common ground on the basis of freedom with mutual respect for human dignity, human rights, and human flourishing as something all sides can uphold. The divide between them is perpetuated and advanced substantially through partisanship to an absurd degree wherein whatever gives electoral advantages to their party is good and anything that might hurt their chances is bad. The good of the party becomes synonymous in a subtle but insidious way with their alleged ideals and aspirations.
While we tend to think Republicans generally support less overt ways to deny or limit freedom, and we beleive freedom is essential to everything else, we also tend to think Democrats at least give some lip service to issues of injustice and inequity and are more open to societal advances that should not necessarily be limited by tradition when those traditions are no relevant or useful.
The problem regarding Democrats today is that they have become the party of imposition and intolerance toward others. Having captured most institutions in this land, they flex their power and, like bad Calvanists, assume the universe favors them simply because they have the power and wealth their opponents lack. Far beyond simply wanting justice and equity, Democrats are moving into some sort of authoritarian-imposed “new humanity” that tears up all tradition and burns down old institutions such as faith and family out of a preternatural aversion to everything from the past.
Many liberals who simply want justice and equality for all persons have been seduced into believing that the path toward authoritarianism and imposing new norms that burn down all the ancient institutions and values is the only path to progress. Arrogance, hubris, hatred, and increasing violence are the new norms on the left, their ideas about justice and equity having become a disingenuous pretext for raw ambitions aimed at monopoly power forever.
We can and do cite the violent and irrational anger on the right, so notoriously on display when the Capitol was stormed by a mob seeking literary to overthrow the government, but this has yet to become a systematic as the violence from the left. Moreover, while most on the right tend to condemn violence and while every institution seeks to shun and shame rightwing violence, this isn’t true for the left. The violence of the left is nurtured by top Democrats and every institution in this land supports it, or at least justifies it, openly.
All this leads people who desire freedom, who may not fit the mold of a conservative, thinking any vote against a Democrat is a good thing because, today, Democrats have become totalitarian, anti-freedom, and violent in their approach to re-creating society as an alt-gendered, atomized, and undifferentiated mass of cogs in their Party machine.
Republicans have betrayed their claims to be for freedom and they continue to treat the poor and disadvantaged as if societal and structural bias is not at all to blame.
Anyone who both loves freedom and desires justice will find Democrats violently opposed to freedom in its real activation but giving lip service to justice and Republicans betraying freedom and most vehemently, if not yet violently in the main, opposed to justice and equity as they blame the victims for their plight.
We do not ask government to implement our program of peaceful and non-violent, unilateral “revolution within”, by which we desire to build among ourselves a sociocultural and socioeconomic alternative structure that allows us to live free and experience equitable justice without favor or prejudice.
We are not relying on “government” and party victories to implement our program, it is something average people must be able to freely pursue and to inhibit this pursuit is itself a tort against society itself, a crime against humanity.
We are not finding things people want or that are trending and then using this to capture and audience. Honestly, that has its place in marketing and persuasion. But it has no place in this effort. We are focusing on a sacred blueprint for human civilization which one may follow through freewill participation and which cannot be imposed by humans over other humans.
Our agenda is NOT to reshape this society according to our best understanding of God’s sacred blueprints but, rather, to be free to explore and actualize those blueprints unilaterally and on a purely freewill basis.
For instance, rather than imposing our will or trying to get other national peoples to be like us, we are working to unilaterally build the genesis structures of a new civilization and its vanguard people, the Upadarian spiritual nation, without seeking to change anything or anyone that doesn’t desire to participate in our freedom-building, nation-building, and civilization-building efforts. Quite simply, to SHOW the world what a nation whose God is the Lord looks like and how its participants act toward one another and the world at large, we are unilaterally creating that new nation on a spiritual as opposed to a political basis.
Likewise, our agenda and program doesn’t follow trends or fads or even things people feel they need or want. Our focus is on discovering and then actualizing a sacred and eternal blueprint which we have a right to implement among ourselves and which no human being or earthly authority has any jurisdiction over.
If we love one another and do not lie, steal, murder, or commit adultery, for instance, there is not law against us in God’s eyes. And if it be not unlawful before God it cannot justly be proscribed by human beings without our informed consent and through freewill participation alone.
For too many on the right and left this isn’t good enough. Not only must they be able to live out and express their beliefs, values, and convictions but the rest of society must bow to these things and participate wholeheartedly to affirm their fragile egos and uplift their choices as if those choices are the only right or just choices one can make. Everything is so “connected”, or “intersectional”, as they say, that your own choices and your own free associations with others must also conform to the “orthodoxy” of the hour or somehow it hurts everyone else who doesn’t like your choices.
(There IS a certain intersectionality often overlooked, a sort of multidimensional and multifaceted matrix of causality and effect that does make many aspects of life at every level interdependent of everything else. But these meshed and highly centralized ecosystems are not necessarily natural and much of the interdependence is forced and contrived. The inherent shared right of private bodies of peopme to unilaterally create autonomous sociocultural and socioeconomic ecosystems that are connected to a broader pluralistic framework should never be questioned by any advanced civilization and yet this is precisely what many who abuse the term “intersectional” are guilty of.)
The answer is unilateral actions by free people as individuals and as freewill participatory associations of people who work toward a common goal. The tendency to wait for the next election in the cause of either freedom or justice only gives more power to politicians who harness those good intentions for their own self-aggrandizement, all while limiting freedom and perpetrating more injustice. Political or civic activism is not off the table, but it cannot remain or become the primary thing, it must be directed mostly at protecting our rights to unilaterally pursue our freedom and justice program through freewill participation and by winning support in a purely consensual manner.
If your vision for society requires more than protecting your rights to pursue this vision through freewill participation alone then your core ideology is actually totalitarian in its spirit. If others must be made to conform and participate in your norms, in their private life and associations, then your ideas are perfectly and utterly useless to humanity.
The war to win freedom so we can pursue things like justice and equity to unilaterally build our own civilizational ecosystem among ourselves that is positive and beneficial to all and that doesn’t require any forced participation, will take many forms and require a multiplicity of tactics in many arenas at many levels. There is no magic elixir to cure us of the ills of an authoritarianism that is infecting every institution in this land.
PGC – Governor Andrew Cuomo resigned yesterday as he saw the writing on the wall in Albany. The Dems and Reps were gathering, almost in bipartisan glea, to prepare to take the once love governor of America down.
They were going to impeach him, but not because of the thousands of deaths that appeared to be maybe perhaps grossly not necessary, the deaths that resulted when some governors, of which Cuomo was the biggest offender, put thousands of Covid patients into nursing homes, leaving to thousands of elderly deaths as the virus raced through these nursing homes in the first few months of the pandemic.
What happened in New York, Pennsylvania, and Michinga will not be investigated by the Federal Justice Department, nor does any state have any such investigations currently being conducted regarding how the governors in these state all chose to put the early infected in with the elderly in confined spaces that were made inaccessible to the loved ones of the elderly, but not the unrelated infected.
Instead,Governor Cuomo was felled because he committed a sin that in the DNC is far worse than possibly ordering thousands of elderly to their deaths, he had sexually inappropriate behavior with woman. Now, granted, his ‘sins,’ if even parlty true, paint him as an untrustworthy lech of a man who does deserve the fate he’s getting, but long before this recent evidence emerged that showed the brutal seriality of his sexual offenses, the evidence against his mishandling of the nursing homes in the early months of the pandemic were enough to have him impeached long before now.
But for the DNC, the sin of lletting the inconvenient die, be they on their way out or on their way in, is far less of a sin to concern ourselves with than sexual misconducts. I say all this with one caveat, that so far there is no evidence to suggest Cuomo ever raped anyone, and if and when such an allegation emerged, then the comparisons at least much closer than they are given the facts as they have been shared so far.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has resigned over sexual harassment claims.
The 63-year-old has denied all wrongdoing but said the move was the right thing to do to let the government get back to work.
A month-long independent investigation concluded Governor Cuomo sexually harassed multiple women after 11 – including current and former aides – came forward with accusations.
Calls for his resignation and impeachment grew from both sides of politics following the findings of the investigation.
PGC – As the United States leave Afghanitan and a trail of broken alliances behind her, the Chinese under Chairman Xi have chosen to side with the Taliban in the war for the hearts and minds of the people. The same nation-state that is regularly feted in American corporate markets, the same nation-state that has more infliuence over America’s media than the American people do, is busy cozying up with the Taliban in a bid to cull from the Afghan mountains what gold they imagine they can if the Taliban welcomed their presence.
Perhaps the coal is the geo-political circumstance of Afghanistan itself, a bridge between what is commonly referred to as the Near East and the Far East. But Afghanistan is a bridge ridged with mountains and difficult terrain, a land not easily tamed if the people of the land don’t will it. America is not the first Empire to die in those mountains, and she won’t be the last.
So China is figuring on trying a different strategy, make nice with the might that is, a strategy America herself has deployed in the past as well. It’s a dangerous gambit but fitting with China’s overal strategy of consolidating world power, gain power through influence where the soul eats and sleep, commerce. If China can help the Taliban exploit the lands for capital for the cause, while getting the kind of cut China will hope to get, this can be a very productive relationship, not just economically, but geopolitically as well. Still, it’s a dangerous game the Chinese play and it remains to be seen if they have the discipline to be a velvet glove master of a land of iron wills.
As the United States withdraws from Afghanistan and leaves a security vacuum there, is China moving in by cozying up to the Taliban? On July 28, Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi held a high-profile official meeting with a delegation of nine Afghan Taliban representatives, including the group’s co-founder and deputy leader Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar. This was not the first visit by Taliban members to China, but the meeting was unprecedented in its publicity, the…
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
