PGC – The Mexican government is using the same tactics as the anti-gun activists in America in going after the heart and soul of gun manufacturers, its operating cost. It does this by costing the gun manufacturers millions in legal liabilities and help lay other groundwork for financial institutions to once again use their monopolized market powers to cut gun manufacturers out of the financial exchange system altogether.
Even if they lose the lawsuit, the gun manufacturers lose. If they can’t pass laws preventing us from owning and possessing the means to self-defense of the times, then they will destroy the instutions that create our self-defense tools for us.
If the US Courts let this go on, more nation-states aligned with the anti-gun coalition will bring suit as well, destroying our gun manufacturing companies once and for all, the desired aim of all the nation-states in the authoritarian club.
The Mexican government filed a lawsuit Wednesday, August 4th, against eleven of the biggest gun manufacturers in the United States claiming the same type of justification for monetary recompense as the Sandy Hook Anti-Gun Group is using in its American suit against the manufacturer of the gun used in the Sandy Hook tragic mass shooting.
The Mexican government was careful not to appear to be targeting US law, a tactic born over the DNC’s inability to pass any meaningful national anti-gun laws. Again, if we can’t legalize it away, we’ll bankrupt it away. This careful wording gives evidence to that supposition, “This flood is not a natural phenomenon or an inevitable consequence of the gun business or of U.S. gun laws. It is the foreseeable result of the Defendants’ deliberate actions and business practices.”
Their business practices are in advertising guns as effective self-defense tools and emphasizing their power.
I can see to the authoritarian in non-American lands how literally frightening it might seem to live in a land that embraces the free ownership and possession of firearms, a key symbol of trust between the people and the state that no other nation in this land in current year can hope to appreciate, let alone understand.
This is a narrative that is easy for the Mexican authoritarian (there are plenty of non-authoritarian Mexicans who dream of living in a land where firearms are freely held by the people) to enter into, as this authoritarian is long in the tooth in statewide gun control execution.
The quote here, though, specifically, attemptsn to decouple the lawsuit from the 2nd Amendment. It attempts to make it a non-second-amendment-rights issue, but, at its core, it cannot help but be such a thing, for, should the suit succeed, the end of gun manufacturing in America means the effective end of the second amendment.
If the people cannot hold the current year means of self-defense, then they will soon be without ownership of anything. All that they hold will be rentals. Maybe the very air you breathe will be metered for taxation purposes.
Still, a foreign power taking advantage of a competing power’s own rules to shake it from within, well, from that perspective this move also makes perfect sense. This is not to suggest Mexico wishes to see America destroyed, only that she wishes to see her less powerful to give her advantage at the trade table. I wouldn’t fault Mexico in the least if my suspicions were true.
This is what nation-states do.
What troubles me is that the keys to this potential vulnerability of US Sovereignty was created by the anti-gun movement, who may very well wish to do far more harm than even Mexico would wish to see done. A weak United States means the removal of a long buffer of relative security. I doubt very much the powers that be that are Mexico would wish to lose that security at this moment in their history.
Their military capacity is less than world-class. This is what Mexico most likely will be focusing on next. For that, it needs a favorable trade deal with the US first and foremost, a strong US, giving Mexico time to develop her military to be able to stand on her own.
The wildcard in this whole affair comes in the form of other nation-states that might see an opportunity to offer Mexico gold in trade as well, specifically China and Russia, but not exclusively so.
The real ‘vilain’ in this whole affair is one of many DNC-serving narratives that are undoing the fundamental fabric of an American democratic republic bounded by the Bill of Rights. This is the unity that makes our diversity possible. Remove that, and you remove the ties that bind, and factions will form that your deep learning models can’t predict.
PGC – It seems the raging anti-gun, anti-bill-of-rights activist David Chipman, the would-be future Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, the ATF, the heroes of Waco.
David failed to disclose to the Senate that he had previously appeared on Chinese State media, a fact that might gain relevance in our current climate, following on the heels of China, who, at the onset of the Coronavirus Panic, threatened to withhold our medicine supples and watch us die of the virus if we kept on about it coming from a lab leak in Wuhan.
Let’s not forget that fact folks, because that China is still the China that our corporate moral supremacist authoritarians are relying on to deliver them wealth beyond their wildest imaginations, all in exchange for dissolving from within the American Bill of Rights spirit, by any means necessary.
This connection of Chipman to Chinese State Media fits an overall pattern of actions by DNC operatives over the past few years. In and of itself, it could mean nothing, as there are reasons for resisters to the Chinese State to allow themselves to appear on Chinese State media, but I’m betting he wasn’t there to resist, but to agree, concur, and echo the same values as the city of Eldorado dictated.
City of Eldorado, the mythical golden city that everyone searches for, where wealth flows with ease to those who are able to capture the prize. This has been what an open Chinese market means to a coalition of folks, from governmental to media to market to social power who found great advantage in loosely aligning with the Chinese state (and some not so loosely).
It is within this backdrop, when we see a man set to take the helm of one of the most well-armed and powerful departments in the Executive Department. This group has broad range to go after all manner of human action that most of us find in some measure fundamental to our sense of peace and security.
It is within this backdrop that such a tie further adds to the weight of evidence that shows how interdependent the DNC coalition and the CCP are at this point, with both pinning their very legitimacy on the power to make their masses see what they will they see, and thus escape the trauma of failed policies, the ire of the people being destroyed.
When you build your Empire on lies, you are soon to face the accelerating need to coerce the truth to silence.
As part of his review, Chipman failed to disclose to the Senate his appearance on Chinese state television, China Global Television Network (CGTN). What was he doing appearing on the Chinese propaganda channel which has had to register as a foreign agent under FARA? He was talking about “gun violence” in the United States after the shooting at the Sandy Hook Elementary school in 2012.
Indeed, CGTN was concentrating on the Sandy Hook shooting as part of an effort to downplay a mass stabbing of 23 children in Henan, China. So Chipman was participating in a propaganda effort, knowingly or unknowingly.
While Chipman revealed many media appearances he’d made or quotes he’d given to media, 16 pages full, he neglected to mention this appearance on Chinese state television when asked in a questionnaire by the Senate.
PGC – U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson calls January 6ther an insurrectionist, not a patriot, and accuses former President Donald J Trump of being the instegator of that ‘insurrection,’ pushing forth the narrative that what happened on January 6th was not a rally gone wrong through a number of factors (with blame to be found among multiple partes) but rather a coordinated effort to overthrow the government by storming the US Capitol, a conclusion that makes little to no logical sense.
The judge is asking you to believe that a group of Americans, the overwheming majority of which were unarmed, somehow thought that storming the US Capitol and siezing it would somehow pull the full might and power of the United States to the ground.
Whatever happened in January 6th will likely be a debate for decades, maybe centuries, to come, but I doubt there will be any but a few fringe conspiracy theorists who will hold to the insurrection narrative in years to come, and then, perhaps we can revisit the officials who used such a damning narrative to attack their political opponents and see if they haven’t themselves been the insurretionists the whole time.
A federal judge sentencing a Michigan man in D.C. Wednesday over his role in the U.S. Capitol riot dismissed any notion that he’s a political prisoner.
Driving the news: U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson said that she wasn’t sentencing Karl Dresch, of Calumet, “because he is a supporter” of former President Trump, noting that “millions of people” had voted for him “and did not heed his call to descend on the nation’s Capitol,” per the Detroit News.
PGC – A US Magesterial Judge named N. Reid Neureiter, who serves in the liberal district of Colorado, has ruled that the lawyers who sued the Federal government over election law violations in 2020 will have to pay the legal fees of everyone involved.
He based his ruling primarily around the assumption that the lawsuits were “fantastical,” committing himself to the narrative that these were the most secure elections ever in the history of the known universe, or words to that effect.
The ruling no doubt will be appealed until it reaches the Supreme Court where the consequences of partisan lawfare are far deeper than when a minor magistrate makes a ruling with his party instead of the constitution, as appears to have happened in this case.
The ongoing debate about the legitimacy of this election is moot, however, in this writer’s opinion, as the Federal government conducted and certified a mass mailer election in 2020, and thus failed to execute an actual republican-democratic election, one with accountability, but instead chose to conduct an unaccountable mass mailer election, the net outcome of which will never be known, nor is it relevent, as even if Donald Trump “won” the election itself should have never happened in the first place.
Lawyers for dozens of Donald Trump supporters who made wild conspiracy claims about Facebook Inc. and Dominion Voting Systems Inc. rigging the 2020 Presidential election will have to pay up for their bogus suit, a federal judge in Colorado ruled.
A pair of attorneys who filed the case on behalf of disgruntled voters violated court rules by making no attempt to verify their “fantastical” allegations against the social-media giant and the voting-technology firm, U.S. Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter concluded Tuesday in Denver.
PGC – And so it has begun, a former Obama official is now throwing a thought up a flag pole to see not only who salutes, but who doesn’t cry out, “is you crazy?”
Well, consider this we the people saying to you, ‘is you crazy?!”
Juliette Kayyem, a former low-level official in Obama’s Department of Homeland Security, is suggesting in an op end in the Atlantic that maybe we should consider putting the unvaccinated on a no-fly list, or, to put it in another term, maybe we should nudge the vaccinated public to subhumanize the non-vaccinated even more.
Perhaps the DNC is betting that the vast majority of the unvaccinated in Bidenmerica are Republicans, or, at the very least, DNC resisters, maybe even DNC deniers. So, by pushing for vaccinations in the first place, they create the self-filtering conditions that let them identify their ‘people’ from all others, faith in government and corporations, the kind of people the DNC wants to be around for decades to come.
Those other kinds, the ones less prone to accept a world where we own nothing and rent everything, well, of course they’d be less likely to vaccinate under these conditions, a vaccine that was rushed, efforts to brutally silence any data that counters the narrative of the state and the corporation, all of which seem willing to work hand in hand on some major public debates in America today.
But maybe they’re just worried about our safety and realize we are far too uninformed, or even informable, for that matter, to make decisions on our own regarding our understanding of safety versus liberty, risk versus reward.
A former assistant secretary for homeland security who served under President Obama is suggesting that unvaccinated people should be placed on a no-fly list by the federal government.
Juliette Kayyem argues in a piece published on The Atlantic that placing the unvaccinated on a no-fly list…
PGC – Facebook is being accused of letting climate ‘misinformation’ get through its filters by a social media report that is sure to give ammunition to those who would wish to see power more rooted in their particular sphere of power.
Governments around the world can now use its own too-quick willingness to attempt to be responsibile for something like misinformation when it threw in with the coalition of the willing in opposition to the great bad boogeyman Donald J Trump, whose legend was used as a justification for turning the 2020 election into a war to overcome filters or lock down opposition to the shared outcome, a DNC win, by any means necessary.
Now, Facebook’s willingness to dive in to such a sea of responsibility in the name of stopping the literal devil, Donald J Trump, makes them vulnerable to any government ruling wannabes that can now use its accepted ‘responsibility’ of being the filter of true data versus misinformation across the board.
So long as the government officials have the ear and the voice and the power of the state behind them, their definition of misinformation had better be yours, Facebook, else you face fines or other such measures beyond fines, such as Facebook-busting antitrust moves.
When you dance with the devil, don’t be surprised when you find, at the end of the dance, all of your valuables missing.
This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 83%. (I’m a bot)
Facebook failed to enforce its own rules to curb an oil and gas industry misinformation campaign over the climate crisis during last year’s presidential election, according to a new analysis released on Thursday.
Exxon alone spent $5m.”The industry is using a range of messaging tactics that are far more nuanced than outright statements of climate denial. Some of the most significant tactics found included tying the use…
Imagine you can’t just start your car and go but have to breathe into a machine to prove you aren’t drunk before you can drive? Imagine when that machine gets it wrong, even trace amount of alcohol even mouthwash can set this off, and you are stuck, unable to move? Imagine every malfunction of the machine becomes a “violation” you have to prove wasn’t your fault? This is the driving nightmare the Democrats want for you!
The Democrats want a breathalyzer in every car so you have to prove you aren’t drunk every time you drive your car.
Tucked into the “bipartisan” infrastructure bill, now over 2700 pages long, is a provision requiring car manufacturers to install these devices in every new car. The way they work, presently, is that when you start to drive it tests you and then randomly tests you as you travel. If it tests positive, you fail to do the test, or the machine has a malfunction, you have so many miles to travel before it shuts your car down. It also monitors your driving and send your information, including violations, to a database.
These devices are being pushed by “Mothers Against Drunk Driving” and, of course, by companies that manufacture them. The devices are notorious for draining your battery even when the vehicle is off, would add a thousand or more dollars cost, and require monthly monitoring fees. Their use would dramatically increase your costs, invade your privacy, treat you like a criminal, and possibly leave you stranded multiple times.
Once again, the ruling class are on a tear, avdancing a new feudalism whereby we, the producers of the wealth they essentially steal, mindless drones on their plantation. This program is not being debated in the light of day, it is being insirted into a massive bill nobody will read in order to be slipped in before we know it.
To Democrats, and their ruling class puppet masters, everyone is a criminal until proven otherwise. But it’s all for “safety”, therefore it’s all good, right? Having a breathalyzer in every car is an easy way to further control the population and keep everyone who isn’t someone in their place.
Bill Collier- In a stunning blast against freedom of movement and privacy, and a further massive tax burden on working people and the poor, Seators Tom Carper (D-Del.) and Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) are pushing for a motor vehicle per-mile user fee. Styled as a “toll” to avoid the word “tax”, this dramatic Federal overreach would cause an intense invasion of privacy allowing for tracking of tour mileage, which may include even tracking your whereabouts, and would potentially add a new layer of red tape to your life as tou calculate and pay these “fees.”
While the money raised would allegedly pay for “infrastructure”, the likelihood of this new slush fund being used solely for its intended purpose is almost zero. Finding new ways to milk the poor and workers, the producing classes in our society, to make life better for the ruling class, all while concealing this intention, seems to be the chief skill most politicians seek to become expert at.
This proposal, as part of the so-called “infrastructure bill”, a “bipartisan” money grab that actually does very little for infrastructure, makes the “user fees” part of a pilot program. What that means isn’t clear, evidently only a few victims in a few places will be initially chosen by Transportation Secretary Buttigieg and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. The end result is, if this is fully implemented, transforming all Federal highways into toll roads or all roads in general, it isn’t clear if these “user fees” will count all miles or only miles on Federal highways, toward your bill.
The fleecing of the producers in our society by uber rich politicos and corporate bigshots is running the normal course of a dying and moribund civilization which has lost its very soul to a craven “world-as-spoil” lust on the part of our depraved ruling class. This proposal represents a massive invasion of privacy and massive increases in the cost of living and will likely only be used to dole out contracts to favored entities who support the right politicians.
The poorest and minority communities will be hardest hit by such a program. Even efforts to waive the fees for the poor would introduce more red tape and dehumanizing complexity to their lives as they will have to “prove” how truly broke they are!
The fact this proposal has bipartisan support is not a surprise. The uniparty is ruled by and for the ruling class at the expense of the producing classes, the workers and makers.
PGC – A 1943 Supreme Court Ruling, West Virginia v Barnette, could undo the whole effort by the DNC to indoctrinate the youth of our land to accept a very specific moral construct, the doctrine of race-based, disenfranchised-based critical thinking that begins with an assumption that generation wrongs must be righted by diminishment of the classes that are part of those generational wrongs.
This type of thinking is antithetical to the spirit of many moral constructs across these lands, including forms of Chrisitanity, Islam, Buddhism, and even non-deistic belief systems like Stoicism or Objevtivism.
Nevermind which might be the one true moral construct, the point is that we live in a pluralistic land of moralities, most all of which can find socio-cultural harmony through the standards of the Bill of Rights. When our public education system, an extension of government, chooses to use its power to influence our children to indoctrinate it into a very specific moral frame, then it no longer represents a republican government, it represents a tyrannical one. Apparently, in 1943, our Supreme Court agreed with me.
By 1962, most schools had a small ceremony to start the day that included the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer. There were prayers at the beginning of football and basketball games, beseeching good sportsmanship; invocations and benedictions at graduation exercises, encouraging students to succeed and be happy; and separate baccalaureate services, imploring the Almighty to bless these particular persons.
A small group decided to challenge these traditions for violating the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Soon, Supreme Court decisions concluding that these references coerced students into accepting certain notions ending most invocations to a higher power in public school.
The Court in the post-1960s era relied heavily on an earlier case, West Virginia v. Barnette(1943), that said:
If there is any fixed star in our constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.
So, we have come full circle: Even though the Supreme Court majority once banned as coercion – public entities prescribing orthodox thought and forcing citizens to “act their faith herein” — a minority of leftists are relentlessly advancing their ideology in public schools in the form of Critical Race Theory
The new totalitarianism is a weird combination of hedonistic alt-gendered self-indulgence, cancel culture bigotry, corporate monopolies, and neocommunist politicos all working together using bogeyman fears and utopian promises to alternatively bully and con the population into submission. The lust for power and control is matched by an opposite desire to be dominated and have all worries removed by some power that takes care of everything for you. This lust for power is also fueled by ego on one hand and desire to avoid personal responsibility on the other hand. It is all the worse vices working as one to advance the power of the few at the expense of the many.
Most of the fights to push back against this totalitarianism within our midst are focused on political outcomes and events, all still aimed at hoping to control who is in the highest offices. These fights are not as essential to the battle as many believe and in some ways are a distraction from the real needs and better tactics.
Totalitarianism thrives in crisis, material dependency, a concentration of wealth and power, and the loss of support for the individual through the institutions of faith, family, and community. When individuals regain material independency and restore their support through a revitalization of faith, family, and community, they destroy the reach and power of totalitarianism in their own lives and relationships. When this happens many hundreds of thousands of times, a core of liberated people emerges who have the means and resources to effect local then state and eventually national election outcomes and they hold enough economic weight that corporations who try to cancel them get canceled themselves.
Building freedom is primarily a local effort that begins with you as an individual with your own immediate family and friends connecting in order to become as self-reliant and prosperous as possible!
Do you want to be controlled by power-mad politicians and corporations whose values you find reprehensible? Or would you prefer to be governed by your own values and to enjoy the mutual support of others who deeply share your values and beliefs?
We basically believe that close-knit collaborative relationships seeking absolute mutual self-reliance and material independency require a high degree of organic cohesiveness that shallow, braod-based coalitions of people whose core values are not deeply aligned cannot obtain. The larger coalitions needed to win an election cannot be translated to the kind of close-knit collaborative relationships needed to obtain material independency within the framework of your essential spiritual and moral convictions.
One breakthrough idea we have is the concept of intentional spiritual nationhood, which is meant to enable people to create a shared identity that reflects their beliefs and allows anyone who uses that identity to easily connect with anyone else who does. When people have such a voluntary shared identity, when it reflects their own beliefs, values, and convictions, they can connect and collaborate naturally, organically, without a top-down controlling hierarchy dictating things to them.
To build such an identity we both offer principles and an example. The “Upadarian” national identity is a form of spiritual nationhood with a Christian core identity and a set of specific ideals, principles, and practices which we might say are based on convictions that aren’t essential Christian dogma but that define that national people group.
Anyone who is a Christian and who embraces the shared convictions of this “national people”, which are spelled out in “The 17 Protocols of Upadaria”, can be a Upadarian. They have nothing to join and no human hierarchy to answer to in this decision or how they will pursue it in their life. The presence of organizations and structures that are based in whole or in part on this identity should never be conflated with the identity itself.
This is the kind of organic cohesiveness needed for small and strictly voluntary groups of people to function together in order to both acheive material independency and nurture their shared beliefs, values, and convictions. It is possible for broader coalitions of people to acheive some degree of mutual self-reliance, but if your own beliefs, values, and convictions are not nurtured, the benefit of such a group is limited.
Material independency is essential to defeating totalitarianism in our lives, relationships, and neighborhoods but spiritual and sociocultural as well as socioeconomic autonomy within a nurturing and totally free-will participatory community of fellow travelers is essential to a material independency that nurtures your own beliefs, values, and convictions.
To simply be materially independent without having your own beliefs supported and valued is of little use to your own long-term spiritual and mental well-being. One needs both spiritual and cultural independency and material independency, but spiritual and cultural independency is a necessary prerequisite to the kind of material independency that makes you truly free!
Our focus is threefold in this arena of local liberation: we promote a specific form of spiritual nationhood, we nurture compatible forms of nationhood consistent with our freedom vision, and we promote broader coalitions of people for mutual support on a group-to-group, multilateral, basis.
Holding local seminars or gatherings to find the right people may be essential to our efforts to build local self-reliance.
Building a local self-reliance and mutual support community should begin with identifying and gathering people who might wish to adopt your shared form of spiritual nationhood. Once they realize that through adopting this intentional form of spiritual nationhood they can collaborate more freely and without any hierarchical control, they will be able to quickly devise ways to be more socioculturally and then materially independent.
We do explore ways people can become more independent, but the focus of this article is on the necessity of forming local ad hoc groups that have a high degree of organic cohesiveness, such as a shared form of nationhood. When you know 20 people who live near you and who share your beliefs, values, and convictions who also have your back, as you do theirs, you will see many new opportunities to become more materially independent together, through mutual efforts.
Let’s focus here on this: creating a group of 20 or more local people who are each all connected to each other for mutual benefit and support and whose beliefs, values, and convictions are in total harmony. Forget everything else for a minute; if you achieve this your options and opportunities to be more free will grow exponentially.
All these efforts to build freedom without building these close-knit local mutual-benefit and mutual self-reliance groups based on strong organic cohesiveness are like going to war without an army. Sure, large groups can be quickly drawn together if the initial cost of engagement is really low, but such groups are undisciplined mobs easily defeated by much smaller and more cohesive groups!
If you want to be free, you need a local group of people with amazing organic cohesiveness who can work together informally or formally to deliberately create material independency while nurturing their shared beliefs, values, and convictions. While we suggest the breakthrough concept of intentional spiritual nationhood as a means to obtain this end, your particular approach simply needs to ensure that the common thread for all members is a deeply held set of beliefs, values, and convictions all within some for of shared ideals, principles, and practices which become the acceptable norms and standards of the group.
If, for instance, you read and pray over and feel drawn to the 17 Protocols of Upadaria as representing your own innermost beliefs, values, and convictions then you could find people who might agree, introduce them to these things, and, for those who feel the same way, begin to build your own local group who agree to work toward mutual self-reliance and mutual support until everyone is material independent.
Through “The Blue Book of Upadaria”, we will provide some ideas and blueprints you can use, but any group who simply use the 17 Protocols can begin building mutual self-reliance and mutual support in their own way. This is entirely autonomous.
This does not mean YOU have to use our 17 Protocols. You can build your own form of intentional spiritual nationhood use some other form of organic cohesiveness. The point is that groups of 20 people or more who strive together to build mutual self-reliance are essential to building freedom and defeating totalitarianism one neighborhood at a time!
If you desire freedom and independence, you MUST decide to work toward finding those 20 or more local people with whom mutual benefit and mutual self-reliance are possible through organic cohesiveness. If you say you cannot do this because “nobody here will do that”, first, we caution that this may not be so, but, second, and if it is true, then maybe you need to move.
Through platforms like the Freedomist and other means, you can connect to other people virtually and gain some degree of support. They may also be a handy way to gather or meet local people who are outside of your present circle but who share your beliefs. What is essential in all this is to know that the closer your group of 20 or more fellow travelers are on beliefs and physical proximity the easier it will be to obtain material independency.
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
