Front

Great Reset Update: Eviction Moratorium Ends, Millions Could Be Effected

Bill Collier July 31, 2021

The moratorium on evictions, which was created by the CDC during the height of the pandemic outbreak, has ended in part due to a Supreme Court ruling saying the CDC has no authority doing this and because Congress could not pass an emergency measure extending the moratorium.

There are over 5.7 million Americans behind on their rent and over $20 billion in rent is past due. What is concerning to many is that despite all these federal payouts in the trillions nothing was provided to assuage the problem, as in the $20 billion in unpaid rent which caused real financial problems for landlords.

Why were there no provisions to assist small landlords who could not afford to weather losing so much income in order to keep the real estate market more stable? The answer is that the ruling class are positively hostile to anyone save the very rich owning real estate in this country, their goal being the end of private ownership outside of government and mega corporate entities they, the ruling class, control.

Landlords, many of whom are middle class owners of one or a few properties, have been unprotected and losing money while renters have been unable to make ends meet due to the government mandated lockdowns of the entire population. The balance between the landlords who went without income and the renters who lost income had never been struck.

The moratorium didn’t end the running up of a tab, renters who didn’t pay anything still owe full rent for all those months. In some cases, renters have actually abused the property and took advantage of the situation and could not be evicted even in those cases.

But many landlords are also major owners of multiple properties and renting homes to the massss has become an industry of its own, often offering poorer quality residences for increasingly high costs to maximize profits. These speculative landlords drive up prices for housing, making it more difficult for the lower income among us, which, ironically, means the same house or apartment they overpay to rent cannot be bought even if they have been renting it for years.

Home ownership is an essential elment in achieving total material independency but too many obstacles to home ownership, including how we do credit checks, taxes, and real estate speculation are making home ownership impossible for poorer people and the young.

Sympathy for the landlords is just not there because most people see a typically wealthy owner of multiple properties who overcharges renters and speculatively buys multiple properties, driving up prices which hurts the very people forced to rent from them. But many other landlords are not rich people or speculative real estate buyers, they are average people who may rent out a room or a guest house or property they inherited.

The collision now between landlords of every type and renters who have either been unable or unwilling to pay is real and the potential for a new housing crisis, not to mention a rush on the courts, is substantial. Could the smaller landlords be forced out of their business only to see mega corporate landlords take over more property and continue a trend away from individual ownership to corporate ownership of real estate?

The “great reset” claims “you will own nothing and like it”, and the disorganized way this moratorium is ending may contribute even more to the transfer of wealth and ownership from the many to the few. This does not bode well for the cause of promoting individual material independency as a means of increasing freedom for all.

Legally, this moratorium was unfounded and many renters did in fact receive substantial federal money allegedly to sustain themselves, so at least some payment to these landlords could have been made. But the entire issue points to the core problem that property ownership itself is in jeopardy and the rules, laws, and regulations as well as taxes surrounding property ownership are more conducive to the concentration of ownership in few hands than the material independency of individuals.

Why I Remain Unvaccinated

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

Bill Collier- My hesitancy on the vaccine is more rooted in the rather outlandish and, frankly, authoritarian responses and the refusal to countenance real questions, than anything else. Add to that the fact this is a new vaccine, the same government pushing this has done some really awful things, and the fact now things shifted from the vaccine providing immunity to now vaccinated people have to mask up again.

The “vaccine fascists” need to re-learn the American’s Creed to understand why bullying, shaming, and coercing undermine confidence and only engender resistance. The homeland of “give me liberty or give me death” isn’t going to, I hope, give up on its essential creed, not even for a virus that has a less than half percent mortality rate.

I genuinely feel there is no real overwhelming guarantee this thing is as beneficial as claimed in the long term or that it may not have some serious problems. I may be wrong, but claling me a conspiracy theorist or canceling me will not only fail to convince me and be morally reprehensible for you to do, it will convince others this whole vaccine regimen isn’t to be trusted.

I can be convinced. I do notice that 99% of recent deaths are people without the vaccine. But, honestly, will this remain the same? It was also reported the Delta variant is more lethal, exact numbers not explained, and more contagious. This is also concerning.

Browbeating me or mandating this only fills me with alarm. Again, I DO NOT TRUST a government that has repeatedly and dangerously lied to me all my life! Too often the government claims their measures are beneficial and decades later Congress passes a resolution begging forgiveness.

The much vaunted polio vaccine infected almost 100 million people with a cancer-causing virus, but to this day the government, the same one extolling the vaccine of the hour, refuses to seriously study and reveal how many lives were lost or how many people got cancer and had their lives ruined. How can we take them seriously?

My hesitancy decreases and I am ready to start the process, then some authoritarian nub screeches terrible things about the unvaccinated being worse than Satan, or something outlandish like that, and I recoil. I don’t know why the ruling class are so adamant about this but I doubt anyone, ever, thinks these louts care about anything but being more powerful. But the fact there is such a full press on and it has so many authoritarian features fills me with dark suspicion.

The trend further away from treating people with dignity and respect, tolerance for all views and creeds, and respect for human rights, amd the trend toward ever more partisan and authoritarian responses meant to gain political advances, has consequences. A plurality of people, who are already demonized by the leftwing authoritarians for not being “woke” enough, just can’t see why they should trust people who call them nazis and racists at the slightest hint of disagreement!

Vaccines may indeed eliminate this vurus as a serious threat. The unvaccinated may spur new varieties that can render the vaccine useless for everyone else. This is a real concern. On the other hand, unlike polio, which had a 5-10% mortality, this virus has a very small mortality rate. What this means is that if we discover, too late to fix it, that all these vaccines do real long-term harm, we could see more harm done by the vaccines than by the virus over, say, a 30 year period.

I am not claiming we will see such harm. But, in light of the government’s predilection to lying, and in light of the continued refusal to face the truth about tainted polio vaccines, being skeptical seems quite reasonable. I am proposing that polling back the demonizing and authoritarianism, on all fronts, may be far more conducive to winning people over to get the vaccine. Doubling down on the hate and authoritarianism will only further fragment society and increase distrust.

This notion a few talking heads are convincing people the vaccine will make them grow two heads and that’s why some remain skeptical is garbage. It’s like when someone is not complying with your wishes and you accuse them of letting someone else convince or control them instead assuming they can think for themselves based on the facts as they see them.

Perhaps the accusers bear the mental illness of letting others dictate their beliefs through propaganda and are just projecting on to others. But trying to convince me this is safe in the long-term, as well as effective, means total transparency, being treated with dignity, and a total commitment to my right to choose my health options.

I want to believe this is safe and effective but when the argument against any questions about these things is canceling people, authoritarianism, and constant one-sided propaganda, it’s not conducive to building trust. When I see everyone, from government to the manufacturers, is absolved of all responsibility if it does you harm, this is disconcerting. Everyone demands we take the vaccine but offers neither an iron-clad guarantee nor assumes accountability and responsibility if they fail to deliver.

I may get the vaccine. I am praying God protects me if I do and even if, once again, we find the government failed, the vaccine didn’t work or was tainted, and the government tries desperately to cover it up for 40 years before Congress passes a resolution apologizing for our country’s misdeeds.

The Right To Cluster

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

We believe and assert that every person within their own familial or other bonds, and through freewill participation by all persons involved, owns a right to cluster together with other people on a private basis to nurture and promote their way of life. Everyone who disputes this right has an authoritarian psychosis and cannot properly and humanely interact with society outside of their innermost lust to dominate their neighbors.

It is, as with every right, impractical to say this right has no limits but, like all rights, those limits must exist only where the practice of this right overwhelmingly harms the rights of others, uses coercion, or involves a tort against another person.

A right to cluster may be somewhat limited by the practical necessity of ensuring a right to fair housing. As an example, if the only housing for many miles is controlled by these clusters of people and you don’t fit in with any of them, then, practically speaking, your right to fair and equal access to housing is, at the very least, undermined. That being said, the likelihood of this every occurring may be slim as natural market forces will compel even clustered living groups to lease residential space to the public under fair housing laws as a way of offsetting costs.

Clustering is not isolating. If you cluster with other people you don’t cut yourself with others outside you cluster group. The world is too interconnected to allow for isolation in clustering but it is also too top-down to neglect the use of clustering as a way of increasing your resources and support in the face of top-down efforts to control you.

What we are asserting is that a cluster of people, and we generally think 120 adults of the same mutual affinity group (the IRS calls it a fraternal bond) is the upper practical limit, has every right to dwell together and make membership in their mutual affinity group a basis of freewill participation. A cluster is not a large-scale group (like an entire mutual benefit, refugee support, and missions society), that is a freewill participatory association, which we also own a right to form. A cluster is a body of people with a mutual affinity bond that is capable of acting as a larger extended multi-family household community that can be self-governing and achieve mutual self-reliance and self-sustainability.

Clusters of people may be a collection of people who live near each other and who create shared spaces and common facilities both for mutual benefit and shared purposes. They will tend to be a combination of residential and non-residential participants who revolve around 120 or so adults of the same affinity group all of whom feel and act as a familial community.

A cluster may in fact include people who are not part of the core affinity group, such as staff, people being housed as refugees, people leasing space, friends and family who reside with members, and children of members who live on site. To cluster is to live more freely and to have the pooled resources and mutual support needed to live in a more luxurious manner than your present means might allow.

People can cluster, people should cluster, people have a right to cluster, and as our shipwrecked civilization flounders into crisis after crisis, people will be compelled by necessity to cluster. It is for this reason we assert this right now, the right to cluster together with others in a familial bond based on a mutual affinity or identity.

How might clustering be abused? Namely, we may see people try to cluster in larger and larger groups in order to essentially discriminate against others. They may only want white people, they may hate people who aren’t monogomous and heterosexual, they may hate Muslims, they may hate Christians or Atheists, and on and on.

Scrutiny of clusters is morally justified to prevent these torts against others, who have an equal right to exist and live, or cluster, and who, within the broader community, must be accorded all the same rights and respect as everyone else. But a cluster of up to 120 adult members and everyone attached to them in a neighborhood setting is not a violation of anyone’s rights.

Within the Upadaria project, we emphasize pluralism to such a degree we encourage Upo Clusters, what we call Shireholds as a group and Estates or Castles for larger single clustered living hubs, to actually set aside space for leasing to the public based on fair housing laws. We don’t, however, beleive it is justified to mandate this, although we strongly feel it is a good thing to do.

It is our conviction that a clustered living arrangement should have the following features (these are ethical standards, not coercive laws):

1. It is based solely on freewill participation within a clearly defined set of shared ideals, principles, practices, mandates, and standards agreeable to all who freely join the community.

2. It is not too large that all the adults members could not get together in person and form a concensus about governance, resource allocation, and the such. Thus around 120 adults begins to be an upper limit to a cluster.

3. It is positively for something, like its way of life or sociocultural identity, it is not based on hatred or violence toward others and it doesn’t promote hatred or violence toward others.

4. It is based on ideas and beliefs more than things like race or ancestry, even if its mutual affinity is based on some sort of nationhood or ethnic identity. As an example, a Scottish Christian mutual affinity may tend to attract people of Scottish ancestry but it would welcome anyone of any race or color who simply had an affinity for and a desire to live a Scottish-Christian way of life.

5. As much as it can, it sets aside around 10% of its housing options for refugees/people in crisis and 20% to be leased to the public under fair housing laws to serve others and prevent itself from becoming insular while contributing to the existence of fair housing access for all.

6. People who join own shares, not the physical building, and if they leave or must be removed, they are either duly compensated or they remain on site but their status changes. Unless they commit a real tort or crime, they are never shunned or shamed for ceasing their active participation.

7. Mutual self-reliance and sustainability are the chief material aims, the object being to assure the physical, emotional, and spiritual sustenance of all persons who are members or who are connected thereto, even people who lease space, and always on the basis of offering and providing, never imposing, such help and support.

Note: if done right, the public will crave leasing space from a Upo Cluster, a cluster based on the Upadarian nationality, because it will assure them of sustenance even during hardships and of safety during times of crisis or disaster.

That all being said, clustered living is an inherent right. A cluster of all black people or all white people isn’t our ideal and we feel these can become insular, prejudicial, and self-destructive, but the right to do things others think is wrong, provided it does no harm to others, cannot be denied.

The right to cluster is a new formulation, but it has always been an inherent right, we believe, even if unrecognized as such on a formal basis.

Authoritarian Islam Shunned By A Growing Plurality of Iranians

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

According to TFI Global, an India-based global news service, citizens of Iran are beginning to openly shun authoritarian Islam. The anti-regime protests are in their third week, despite violent responses, mostly over such things as lack of water due to a nationwide draught, lack of electricity, and Iran’s foreign policy which sees billions of dollars wasted on adventures that do not serve the Iranian people.

Demonstrators in major Iranian cities have called for the death of their leaders and an end to the religious system. One common cry is “no Gaza, no Lebanon, I sacrifice my soul for Iran”, a cry that has surfaced in almost every protest since the massive 2009 protests. For the most part, Democrats has essentially been soft on or turned a blind eye to such protests, for instance in 2009 President Obama did nothing to show any tangible support for the protests.

Deaths, injuries, and widespread arrests and detentions are continuously happening as vans show up in neighborhoods and pull out 500 activists at a time and then disappearing them. Far from causing the protests to stop without their now detained leaders, new leaders keep stepping forward and the protests persist. One openly wonders if some Democrats look on this oppression and wish they too could round up their opponents, based on the rhetoric of many Democratic leaders and the press who are using January 6th as a casus belli to oppress all Republicans.

It is hard to predict the stability of the regime which is being propped up by Russia and China and which the current US Administration seems to tacitly support and is willing to “negotiate with” to ease sanctions and further boost the regime. The alliance of authoritarians from China and Russia and even America’s Democratic Party establishment against freedom sees three distinctly different forms of authoritarianism colluding to prop up yet a fourth version of authoritarianism. It seems that what connects them is a fundamental belief that the few should lord over the many and that this is best for stability.

From America’s secular hedonism to Iran’s Islamist cultism, the common theme is that whatever the ruling class believes must and can be imposed by force on everyone. Any authoritarian government, or would-be authoritarians (the US is not an authoritarian state despite the outlandish and fantastical aspirations of the Democratic Party establishment and its lunatic fringe base), would naturally react against any popular uprising. This is the reason why the Democrats cannot bring themselves to side with the Iranian people in a meaningful and substantive way.

Azadi, meaning freedom, is the craving of what appears to at least be a growing plurality of Iranians and any craving for total freedom will be shunned by every authoritarian of every stripe, on principle. The problem for Azadi in Iran is that the movement is not presently capable of meeting force with force and nor does it have any tangible support from any outside power.

Freedom Through Clustered Housing “Freeholds”

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

Freedom is the domain of the free and free people are individuals whose rights, persons, and property are respected by others but maintained through their material independence. While freedom has political implications, and there is such a thing as political freedom, freedom is more like a state of being through mostly material independence and self-sufficiency.

We introduce the general concept of extended “extended freeholds” consisting of around 10-20 or so adults who inwardly feel and behave as a family unit, even if they aren’t related by blood, and who share or individually own enough resources to ensure the basic physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being of every participant.

Within the Upadaria project, we refer to these Extended Freeholds as Kinship Groups and their facilities as either Estates with multiple houses or Villas with multiple condos in a single building.

This is a sort of cohousing idea, albeit with much more privacy and much less collectivism. An Extended Freehold, or a Upo Estate or Villa, is not a collective but it does use a combination of intentional extended kinship, cooperation, collaboration, and organcic cohesiveness to save money and pool resources while nurturing a shared way of life.

The Kinship Mandate

WE IMPART THE PRACTICES AND VIRTUE OF KINSHIP

We form small, extended familial groups and practice mutual care and support with our relatives, fellow Upadarians, and fellow Believers according to a Biblical blueprint. We refer to these as Kinship Groups wherein we view the success and well-being of those we are connected to as equally important as our own.

The 17 Protocols of Upadaria, Protocol Eight

This concept of extended and intentional kinship is essential in times like these when all the meta-structures of society engender abject dependency by the individual who is separated and isolated from others because of a radical individualism that, ironically, is paving the way to collective top-down control by the few over the atomized and undifferentiated many.

The all-out assault on the moral and sociocultural foundations for a society wherein most people are raised in a loving home by a mom and dad, and an extended family and community, is aimed at dividing people so much that only a mass of atomized and undifferentiated individuals remain. Such a divided mass of atomized individuals is quite easy to control through top-down social, economic, cultural, and political structures.

An Extended Freehold Villa may look like a mansion with 3-5 condos for families and 2-3 single adult residences with common areas for residents and non-resident members of a mutual benefit society represents a new architecture and a new mode of living that nurtures the individual without smothering them.

With the possible exception of well-off people who can afford all the accouterments of material self-sufficiency, and staff, most average people CANNOT swim against this tide or resist its material pressures on their own WHILE maintaining a high level of prosperity. Additionally, most cannot afford the luxuries a small group of 10-20 adults could afford through pooling resources and/or doing some of the work cooperatively themselves.

The concept of an extended freehold comes back to a freehold as a piece of land and connected assets whereby a family could 100% meet is basic needs. The extended part of it comes from the fact that a few families, around 20 adults in total, who cluster together near each other or on the same “freehold” of a few acres or partial city block, can become fairly self-sufficient.

We speak of clustered housing as opposed to cooperatives, communes, and cohousing, although strictly speaking an extended freehold may be partially classified as cohousing. This concept of an extended freehold as a household group consisting of a few nuclear families and single adults who are part of those families and a number of non-residential members of a mutual benefit society is far from any form of collectivization. It actually nurtures and supports the individual, giving them more freedom than they ever could have as an atomized individual under a meta-scale, top-down system of control.

An extended freehold might be a group of families who live near enough to each other to build the tools for self-reliance such as food and energy production. Again, within the Upadaria project we call these freehold groups “kinship groups” and their physical space an Estate or a Villa. But this is a form of an extended Freehold

Ideally, this concept envisions people in these household groups doing some sort of clustered living arrangement where perhaps there are 5-10 homes and/or apartments clustered around a Common House with food and energy production in the center as well. Or it may be a single mansion-like building with 5-10 condos connected to common areas featuring luxury appointments.

The legal structures to make this happen include a mutual benefit society (501 c 8, IRS defined “fraternal benefit society”), mutual benefit corporations, mutual assurance funds, a land trust, and/or other entities as needed. Two points are necessary here: we have researched some of the particulars and legal structures but, secondly, this short essay is only conceptual.

Basically, we call this “clustered living” in terms of lifestyle and “clustered housing” in terms of the physical infrastructure. What is important here is that if you don’t begin to seriously consider clustered living and, eventually, clustered housing, that you will find that maintaining your freedom and prosperity gets harder and harder.

The very basis of the new authoritarianism within the West is to atomize society in a massive “divide and conquer” power move. You refusing to countenance the need to cluster together with people who share your beliefs, values, and convictions is exactly what the people who think they own you want you to do. Stay atomized, stay vulnerable, stay enslaved.

The extended freehold as a concept allows you to cluster together with such people and build the local means of your own material self-sufficiency, which is the greatest defense against the socioeconomic pressures that are brought to bear when you defy the top-down power agenda. It is the most practical counter to authoritarianism that is reactive but proactive, it doesn’t just slow the trend toward authoritarianism, it reverses it.

NYTimes Reporter Wants State to Treat GOP Like Enemies of the State

Freedomist Curator July 29, 2021

A New York Times reporter who covers the Justice Department, Katie Benner, and DNC party aperachik low-renter, released a series of Tweets on June 28th, 2021, in response to the House Select Committee on UnDNCism, aka the Jaunary 6th Committee.

In the first tweet, she stated her belief that it would be appropriate, against the backdrop of the Capitalstag Fire, that is, January 6th, to consider a politician’s supporters to be enemies of the state:

Today’s #January6SelectCommittiee underscores the America’s current essential natsec dilemma: Work to combat legitimate national security threats now entails calling a current politician’s supporters enemies of the state

She followed that up with a tweet that first articulated the American standard of not using state power to target political oppontents, but, well, in light of the Capitalstag Fire, well, maybe we should consider this basic bulwark against the tyranny of a state that would usurp a republican bill-of-rights-based form of government.

As Americans, we believe that state power should not be used to work against a political figure or a political party. But what happens if a politician seems to threaten the state? If the politician continues to do so out of office and his entire party supports that threat?

She capped it all off by tacitly admitting that the Russia hoax and the impeachment hoaxes were both efforts by the state to essentially execute her desire in the previous tweet, to use the state to crush political dissent. But this was far worse than what she even proposed, as one part of the state used its state power to attack another part of the state for political ends, to silence opposition to the CCP-knockoff party, the DNC.

This dilemma was unresolved by the Russia probe and 2 impeachments. With many Republicans denying the reality of the Jan. 6 attack, I doubt the #January6thCommittee will resolve it either. That leaves it up to voters, making even more essential free, fair access to the polls.

Surprisingly, her tweets were deleted.

And if you think my characterizing the party she serves as the CCP-knockoff, it should be noted this reporter for the New York Times covering the inJustice Department formerly worked with a Chinese Communist Party publication, the Beijing Review.

This is from her New York Times profile:

“Katie Benner of Bloomberg joining The Times as a technology reporter.

She’s covered Wall Street and Silicon Valley. She’s been a magazine writer and a columnist. Early in her career she wrote for Beijing Review, and since last fall, she has been based in San Francisco for Bloomberg View.

In Chinese Communist Party style, after she lobbed her viral infections and they did their work of further demonizing half of America and inciting more DNC zealots to take lethal action, she deleted her tweets quietly and went about her day attempting to subvert and destroy the American republic.

Sometimes, ‘enemy of the state’ is defined merely by those who hold the authority of that state alone. For her sake, not ours, she better hope the DNC completes its power consolidation, for the next group of people are not long to suffer the abuses of this party machine.

News Source – American Thinker

Lightfoot Loves Excluding Access to People Because of Race

Freedomist Curator July 29, 2021

While facing a Judicial Watch lawsuit for attempting to bar whites from interviewing her, Mayor Lori Lightfoot is once again stating she would do it all over again, she exclaimed, in a New York Times podcast this past Monday.

She added, in the podcast, “I’m unapologetic about it because it spurred a very important conversation, a conversation that needed to happen, that should have happened a long time ago,”

The following day, Judicial Watch entered amendments into the court records to their lawsuit against the anti-white, anti-bill-of-rights Mayor which consisted of this podcast transcription, adding to their claims she intended on excluding people from access to government based on race.

That’s what she did folks, as simple as that, and if you’re ok with that, well, you belong to the same group of racists that you imagine you are fighting.

Chicago Mayor ‘Absolutely’ Would Deny Interviews Again to Whites

From www.dailysignal.com
2021-07-27 20:23:39
Steven Hall
Excerpt:

Judicial Watch announced Tuesday that it has amended its lawsuit against Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, a Democrat who claims to be “unapologetic” about her previous policy of granting interviews only to journalists of color.

Lightfoot told The New York Times for a podcast released…

Read Full Article

Covid-Hysteric Pepper Sprays Mom, Child in Elevator for Being Unmasked

Freedomist Curator July 29, 2021

A woman fearing for her life due to Covid-19 pepper sprays a mother and child for not wearing masks in public.

This is the product, most likely, of MSM fear-mongering to convince Americans to shut down their lives and forgo their freedoms to stop the great threat that is Covid-19.

As usual, the DNC, the party in power in market, state, and culture through corpostate monopolies and state corpocracies. is identifying a real need, to address the pandemic that is Covid-19, and exaggerating it by a thousand or more percent to fear people into towing the DNC-controlling party line, from soup to nuts, cradle to grave, bedroom to shop, so that all there is is party in the same way that the Chinese Communist Party currently enjoys.

They’re not there yet, but a legitimate threat worth altering our lives over, Covid-19, becomes the beubonic plague of the 1300s, and the solutions are all draconian, leading to a mass shift in ownership across the land, as the small businesses die and the big corpostates grow.

One of the other side effects of this mad hype is the creation of zealots, people who actually fully believe the hype, and beyond, people predisposed to such hyper realities for a myriad of reasons.

It appears one such person emerged in Pike Place Washington, where a 32 year old woman, whose name was not released by authorities, allegedly assaulted a woman and her child with pepper spray at Park Place Market.

The incident happend on July 27th, 2021 around 4:30PM. This was a woman who appears to have been on a vigilante mission, to punish the maskless, and no wonder, national politicians, national MSM DNC talking heads have been calling the unvaccinated and the unmasked everything from Nazi to Mass Murderer. She has the tacit approval and encouragement of the DNC machine, the MSM DNC, the Social Media DNC, the Federal Government DNC, to view people who fall into these categories as killers worthy of death itself.

Thankfully, she had ‘mercy’ and only executed her ‘rightoues’ punishment on the subhuman among us with a pain punishment, pepper spray to the face.

Authorities found her with a baby stroller. Inside the baby stroller was a bottle of bleach and pepper spray.

She struck the victim, the mother and her child (age and sex of child not given), in an elevator. The mother told police she asked the woman if she was ok and the woman then pepper sprayed herself and her daughter.

The Covid-hysteric told police she was in a high-risk category for Covid, which explains why she would go out and enter into elevators in the first place.

The authorities stated that she was booked in King County Jail, with the nature of the charges not being proffered.

Expect to see more and more stories like these as the DNC-controlled authorities of the land continue to count on Covid fears to consolidate their power.

News Source- Seattle Times

iDOJ Shocked at Audits After Mass Mailer Election, Threatens States

Freedomist Curator July 29, 2021

The US inJustice Department has come out swinging against any opposition to the mass mailer election of 2020, aiming to quell efforts in other states to take a look under the mass mailer election hood of 2020.

The inJustice department were alarmed about the “unusual second round of examinations” attached to the 2020 mass mailer election. Remember folks, the key phrase we are repeating here is mass mailer election.

As we’ve said in other reports, the audits may or may not find anything, but they are irrelevant to the more pressing fact that we conducted a national election using a mass mailer to do it.

Here is an interesting chart from MIT that will show you what we mean:

From a previous high of 20% in terms of mail-in ballots in 2016, this election saw close to 50% all votes being conducted by mass mailer, more than doubling the previous high percentage. For the Justice Department, the inJustice Department, correalating an increase in post-election concern to this massive spike in vote-by-mail is either too difficult or too inconvenient in how it affects the political fortunes of the CCP-knock-off party, the DNC.

An inJustice Department mouthpiece ‘clarified’ to reporters the intent of the warning with this statement, “I think the reason we’re issuing this as guidance is to tell jurisdictions generally that we are concerned that if they’re going to conduct these audits … they have to comply with federal law. This document sets down a marker.”

This official issued this statement behind closed doors anonymously. No one from within the department has leaked the identity of the press whisperer.

The warning seems to be about sending a message to the states that the Feds will mess with their stuff through attempts to arrest or sue officials that might take part in one of these audits of a mass mailer election.

(note: to the usual crowd of DNCers in all your forms who might be righteously screaming right now, “It was a pandemic!”, that fact is irrelevant to the more pressing fact that we conducted a mass mailer election, no matter the reason, a method of voting that has no accountability and should be afforded no trust).

Let’s see what happens in “Red Country” in response to this not-at-all-veiled threat on states’ sovereignty.

Tony Podesta Gets Job With CCP’s Huawei

Freedomist Curator July 29, 2021

Tony Podesta was facing serious prosecutorial threat for his role in the Russia hoax against then-President Trump, but, thankfully for him, we conducted a mass mailer election and voila we get Biden.

(note: we are not claiming Biden didn’t win the election, but we are claiming a mass mailer election is no election at all)

After the Biden mass mailer win, Podesta was still uncertain whether his allies in the DNC would yet not take advantage of his vulnerable position to cull him through prosecution.

Podesta, the brother of John Podesta, one of Barack Hussein Obama’s inner-circle political hatcketpeople (right next to the likes of Rahm Emmanuel), is now off the hook for sure, for sure, not because Federal prosecutors announced anything (they haven’t, and their silence is defeaning), but because he’s landed a sweet deal helping Huawei invade American lands, in service to a police state focused on destroying from within an American republic formed around the Bill of Rights and the principles that emerge from them.

Podesta has a long history of lobbying our government for China favor, and it is assumed he will fill that role for Huawei.

The admission of employment is the final symbol of approval he can receive from the DNC that they will indeed reward their soldier with a sweet monetary payoff thanks in large part to their frenemies and inspiration, the Chines Communist Party.