April 23, 2026

Front

Biden Teases Vaccine Requirement Mandates from the D

At the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in McLean, Virginia, with Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines present, President Biden was asked if he would consider executing a Federal mandate on getting vaccines.

Biden responded to the question by saying, “that’s under consideration right now,” a move that is sure to ampify the tensions in this land even more than it already is if the Federal government claims to have such authority in the first place.

If he does, we are sure the next step will come from states not beholden to the party of total power, the DNC, who might very well pass laws expressly protecting its citizens from such assaults on liberty.

We are betting no such mandates will come, but rather, that it is telegraphing to the states inclined to make such decisions on their own, a move that is sure to affect those that live in what are colloquially referred to as blue states, but which we will call CCP-knock-off party controlled (that is, the DNC) states, or simply knock-off states.

We are not anti-vax here, but we are anti-mandate, for sure.

 

Pennsylvania Government School Counselors Want Your Children to Hate You and Your Country

The School Counselors Association of Pennsylvania just signalled its commitment to the perpetuation of racism and bigotry recently by coming out in support of Critical Race Theory being taught in classrooms.

First we were told that CRT is a legal standard only taught in law schools, so reports of CRT in our government-run schools were wild conspiracy theories.  Then we were told that CRT is the only way to end racism in America, so anyone opposed to it is simply anti-racist.

As violent authoritarian types often do while they yet have lack of total monopolistic power, this group is appealing to actual injustices in the land to justify injustices that will soon outstrip the injustices they allege to be ending.  They do this by failing to actually end the injustice they promise to end (as a matter of fact, they often excacerbate them, and we are sure this is what will happen here) WHILE adding more people to the rolls of injustice than were there before (as CRT most assuredly does).

Keep reading the Freedomist for more on CRT and the complexity of confronting a program of police-state control without undermining the parts of that program that might be beneficial to Americans, such as facing our sins, reporting on them, sharing them, and seeking to create more just societies that measure up to a Bill of Rights standard this nation-state has yet to fulfill, but has consistently been moving ever closer to fulfilling.

We won’t throw the baby out with the bathwater, and CRT does have contained within it some ‘babies’ we hope to keep.

The bottom line is that an ideological frame that assumes humans are reducible to melatonin, genitals, and sexual preference is scientifically, spiritually, morally, and ethicly unfit for government schools that are allegedly there, in part, to create good citizens in a Bill-of-Rights-based republican form of governance.

The bottom line is that telling children their nation is evil, telling children their skin and their relation to their genitals defines their worth in society is criminally vulgar and molests the children the state alleges to be serving and equipping.  This, my friends, is the underlying dark flaw of CRT, and Pennsylvania School Counselors just made it known they stand for this molestation of children by the state.

 

China Downplays Latest Targeting of Citizens in Pakistan after

Yesterday, June 28th, 2021, a Chinese national was wounded after an attack was executed in Karachi, Pakistan.  The assailant used a gun despite Pakistan’s strict antigun laws to target Chinese citizens for death as China is beginning to extend its presence into foreign lands that don’t appreciate Chinese imperialism any more than they appreciated American imperialism.

This news is not as significant as how China is responding to the action, choosing to brand this as an “isolated incident,” despite the recent bus bombing in the region of Kohistan, Pakistan.  9 Chinese nationals, all engineers, were killed in that attack.

This move, to this writer, seems to be more about the dome4stic audience at home than the audience abroad, especially the Pakistani one, as the CCP will have to use its media corporations (in the same way the DNC does here in America) to convince the Chinese whatever they need to convince them to push the narratives forward that keep them in power and extend it.

As more Chinese die in foreign lands as a result of Chinese imperialism, this effort will become increasingly difficult even for the CCP to manage.

It was the Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian who labeled the assault an “isolated” incident not indicative of any collective sentiment by the Pakistani people themselves.

 

The potential threat to the state (and by extension the corpostate that serves it and is protected by it) control over the means of value exchange, currency, that cryptoocurrency offers might be seen in the recent fear tactics being deployed by an American Senator, DNC-CCP Senator Sherrod Brown, who recently declared that cryptocurrencies are an existential threat to Americans’ economic security.

Speaking on the state of crytpocurrencies, Brown said the currencies weren’t real dollars, which is true, they’re not fiat-based (or debt-based, really, but we’ll leave that discussion for another time), and that these currencies put our real dollars at risk (as if the Bidenflation, that’s Biden’s inflation to the uninitiated, doesn’t do that and more).

He called the exchanges “a shady, diffuse network of online funny money.”  He informed Americans, who he seems to view as being incapable of making decisions on their own despite being part of an alleged republican model of government that assumes such powers among the rank and file from the state, that “if we want a solution to Americans’ legitimate fears about our banking system, shady start-ups are not the answer.”

As an addendum, I should add that the RNC record on cryptocurrencies is not much better (if it is at all) than the DNC, and this point also adds to the assumption made by many (including this writer’s) that the RNC is token opposition to the DNC.  So long as we Americans rely on these two parties for relief from state and corporate tyranny, we will lose, again, and again, and again, to the few elites who control the means of social and cultural production.

Twitter Nukes Audit Efforts on it

Yesterday, Twitter made moves to seek to quell the resistance to the mass mailer election of 2020 when it moved to end the twitter presences of numerous accounts that had been sharing information about ongoing election audits around the country.

The move was made under the police-state-standard-favorite guise of preventing dangerous misinformation from being shared with the sheep-like, child-like public, a public that must be told what to think and how to think by the corporate executives all busy living hedonistic lifestyles of excess and entitlement from atop their mighty gated fortresses of power.

From Talking Points Memo:
Among the casualties: The official @ArizonaAudit account, as well as the sharper @AuditWarRoom account, which provided a constant stream of attacks aimed at critics of the sham recount. The anonymous creator of the latter account was also behind several other now-suspended accounts: @AuditMichigan, @AuditWisconsin, @AuditNevada, @AuditGeorgia, @Audit_PA, @Audit_Arizona.

This move is yet more fruit of a nation-state controlled, legislated, and moralized by the corpostate that represents in almost complete unity the will of the party, the DNC, which seems to be more and more pulling its inspiration from the Chinese Communist Party, which expects its corporations to enforce and propagate its party values to the ‘customers’ it serves.

The age of customer and provider is over in America, as corporations now view true Americans, those that hold to the legal and spiritial principles of the Bill of Rights, as subhumans to be weeded out of their police-state-friendly gardens.

America held a mass mailer election, there is no need for an audit for there was no election, as mass mailer elections are unaccountable by their very nature, and no audit will change that fact, no matter the results it might allege to discover.  How can you figure out the results of an election that has no accountability and measurability in it in the first place?

This writer cares little about the audits themselves, for the reason mentioned above, but I care greatly for the continued assumption of fact supremacism, of moral supremacism, that corpo-state billionaires and their cowardly hangers on wish to force on Americans, coercively, through the power of their monopolistic hold on the marketplace of commerce and ideas, and so should you.

A people cannot be free that are not self-sustaining.  Where self-sustainability is dead, tyranny lives, and this, my friends, is where we live in current year.

 

Biden’s DOJ Drops Charges Against “Alleged” Chinese Spies

Biden’s DNC-infused and serving Department of Injustice is telegraphing to the world its alignment with the Chinese Communist Party by moving quickly to suppress the just efforts to bring to account the Chinese military researchers who violated American law and engaged in spying and espionage efforts to enrich the Chinese military, sworn enemy of the American way of life.

The Department of Injustice announced it will be dropping 6 cases against the Chinese spies that were headed to a California Federal Court, the Eastern District Court of California.  In a statement given to the Washington Examiner, a DOJ (aka DNC) spokesperson, Wyn Hornbuckle, said,

“In all of our prosecutions, the Department of Justice evaluates the merits of a case as it prepares for trial.  Recent developments in a handful of cases involving defendants with alleged, undisclosed ties to the People’s Liberation Army of the People’s Republic of China have prompted the department to reevaluate these prosecutions, and we have determined that it is now in the interest of justice to dismiss them.”

As the Washington Examiner highlighted, one such case involved a researcher named Tang Juan, who failed to disclose her military service in the People’s Liberation Army, an institution of anti-Americanism that is seeking to destroy our liberties from without and within.  Even in 2020, before the Presidential Election, the DOJ apparently had DNC operatives that were pushing back against the Americans still occupying that institution, operatives who were claiming that her lack of mentioning her military service didn’t appear to be an example of intentional obstruction, but merely omission.

From the Washington Examiner:

Tang’s defense lawyers told the court in a trial brief earlier this month that “there is dissension in the FBI’s own ranks” about the case against Tang. The lawyers pointed to an April 2021 draft analysis written by two FBI analysts titled “Defining the Extent of Obfuscation of Visiting Chinese Scholars’ Ties to the PLA.” The analysts suggested that the visa application’s military service declaration is potentially ambiguous, making it difficult to determine “whether obfuscation is intentional or for nefarious tech transfer purposes.”

The move by the DOiJ further underscores, in this writer’s opinion, the importance of the CCP to the DNC’s source of power in America and further erodes Americans’ confidence in a Justice Department limited by the Bill of Rights and working in the interests of a free American people.

 

The families of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting that happened in 2013, leaving 26 dead, including 20 children,  have sued the manufacturer of the rifle of that the shooter used to carry out the act.

That manufacturer was Remington, a once-legendary gun manufacturer that fell out of disfavor after gun owners came to conclude the quality of the product had gone done.  The manufacturer is now bankrupt, but in an effort, it seems, to discharge its liabilities it is offering the families a collective settlement of $33 million.

There are nine families involved in this suit, meaning each family would get $3.7 million.  The manufacturer filed its offer at the Waterbury Superior Court in Connecticut this past Tuesday, July 27th, 2021.

The move, if accepted, could have two potentially radically different outcomes, one which establishes gun manufacturing liability for improper use of firearms that brings harm to others, or one that takes the precedent potential off the table altogether by avoiding any precedent-setting outcome by the courts.

For the families, who have been propped up in large part by anti-gun activist groups, the temptation to settle might be significant, even if the people who brought them to the dance would be disappointed, as they are most assuredly seeking to set definitiive precedent in American legal jurisprudence that could effectively end gun manufacturing in America.

The battle for the war against guns is raging, most likely, between the material interests of these families and the police-state interests of the party Apparatchiks behind this lawsuit (at least as I see it).

The question is this, even if the families take the cash, will the settlement effectively end the threat to gun manufactuers in America or will it create a de facto chilling born from the lack of spinal conviction of corporate American leadership?

Given the trend in corporate America to constantly bend the knee to the most extreme DNC-infused anti-American, anti-human moral codes known to humanity today, this writer is more than concerned that a settlement in this case, just being offered, is already laying the groundwork not just for some gun manufactuers that are part of larger corporate conglomerates to shut down shop, at least to American retail consumers, but also to companies on whom these manufacturers rely on to produce and deliver that product, especialy in the financial sector, an industry that has already demonstrated its willingness to assault the Bill of Rights ‘legally’ through its monopolistic enforcement of DNC-values over American ones.

I am hoping the families are pressured to not settle and that they ultimately lose a lawsuit that should have never been allowed in the first place, though my faith such an outcome will happen in this anti-American climate is not great.  Accepting a settlement will make the effort to destroy the 2nd Amendment through fascist corporatism will be a fait accompli, so we have nothing to lose, really in hoping they don’t settle, despite the lack of faith we might have that the courts will reflect American, as oppossed to DNC values.

 

Private Intel For American Patriots

MCALVANY INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR

American patriots now have digital access to one of the oldest, most proven “private intelligence” reports on the planet. The McAlvanay Intelligence Advisor has been providing accurate, actionable intel to Patriots for over 45 years and is now available online to MILLIONS of Americans who need to know what’s REALLY going on and what’s coming.

The Freedomist has entered a joint venture agreement with our partners the publishers of this incredible private intelligence report. Accuracy, timeliness, and prescience are not words we commonly use when it comes to most “news” or even intelligence, but we’ve seen this report keep its readers from losing during the housing crisis and how it largely foresaw the turbulence of the past year. 

You can now, for less than 77 cents a day, subscribe to the best and smartest “private intelligence report” available to patriots who love America! The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor is a BESPOKE level private intelligence report, delivered monthly, that will show you exactly what it REALLY happening and what is LIKELY to happen. The best way to be prepared is to KNOW the real score and to see what is probably coming down the road.

COMPARABLE SERVICES cost much more, but being less expensive is a reflection of their commitment to reach as many people as possible, it is not aa reflection of the true value of the service!

The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor has been around for more than 45 years providing real “intel” to average people. Its predictive analysis has kept thousands of readers far ahead of everyone else. As a subscriber, you will get a fully-baked personal :”intelligence report” that will show you what’s REALLY coming your way. It’s not “sponsored” by corporate interests and it’s not beholden to ANY “political” side, it’s only loyalty and focus in on its reader, YOU!

Here is a typical customer review- “I’ve been a subscriber for over a decade and MIA has, without a doubt, helped me preserve my most valuable assets and prepare for the bumps and turns before they happen, not during. It’s hard to put a price on that.” – Rebecca M.

Will the housing bubble return, is crypto the future, what new laws and regulations will pass, will international markets rise or fall? The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor is, bar none, the best private intelligence report any ordinary person can buy and that, we suspect, even intelligence community members pay attention to.

SUBSCRIBE NOW to the McAlavany Intelligence Advisor and start to get ahead of the curve immediately.

Go this page and SCROLL DOWN then CHOOSE YOUR OPTIONS or READ MORE on the main website.

Legally Gamed Elections Make A Mockery Of “Democracy”
Storm clouds gather as people ask themselves openly whether whoever won the White House truly won. In 2016 Democrats blamed “Russia collusion” and asserted that Trump was never legitimate while in 2020 the Republicans returned the favor blaming a “rigged” vote-counting conspiracy theory. But the problem may not be “legal”, as in a crime or fraud, it may be something perfectly legal but absolutely unethical.

By Bill Collier, Publisher- Legally gamed elections are the result of dirty pool, merely legerdemain and blatant and dishonest media collusion with their favored Party, the Democrats in most cases, the Republicans in fewer cases. This turns our much vaunted “democracy” into a sham because no true “informed consent” is possible under these shady circumstances.

The 2020 election wasn’t stolen by fraud, it was unethically hijacked through media manipulation and extra-legal legerdemain, e.g. unelected bureaucrats enacting policies that ran afoul of state law and ignored the legislatures. We realize some feel strongly that real fraud occured, and if or when we see extraordinary proof to back these extraordinary claims, we will change our tune.

That being said, the 2020 election, and MANY OTHERS, some favoring Republicans, were not truly fair and free of dirty tricks which, while “legal”, are certainly not ethical. Gamesmanship as opposed to honestly conveying your true intentions, philosophy, and character colors our elections and makes a mockery of any concept that winners of our elections truly have a mandate earned through informed consent.

This does not mean Biden didn’t legally win, it means, in part, he had “legally rigged” the process to give him an unfair advantage by the way the rules were changed and by the corruption of a “free press” that is merely a lapdog to the Democratic Party. It’s not fraud but it is dirty pool. It is perfectly legal to game the system and play dirty pool and to not ever really and honestly earn the informed consent of voters who basically have no idea what you true intentions, philosophy, and character are!

Dirty pool is integrated fully into our politics and while both Democrats and Republicans play dirty pool habitually, Democrats are just better at it right now, although not always and in many ways 2020 was a bad year for them. Currently, the Democrats, despite all the dirty tricks and legerdemain they could muster, only have a slim majority in the House and a tie in the Senate broken by the Vice President’s tie-breaking vote.

Elections as we see them all over the world are not capable of being a free and fair competition in which informed electors choose candidates based on an accurate knowledge of their true intentions, philosophy, and character. This is true in Israel, Germany, Russia, and the good old US of A, but, obviously, even more true in Russia, for example.

Is it possible to have free and fair elections where true informed consent based on honestly knowing the intentions, philosophy, and character of candidates can be obtained? We have strong doubts and the trend away from this possibility just isn’t getting any better, nor do we foresee any changes.

Alternative models cannot be created at scale in our present sociocultural and political structures because they are stratified and stagnant. Trying to change things like the behavior of unethical “reporters” who literally lie and misrepresent things for purely partisan purposes, robbing people of their right to informed consent, is beyond this civilization’s capacity. Moreover, how would you “regulate” the press to make them behave without destroying the very concept of a free press?

The “solution”, unfortunately, if you want to stop bad actors like the miscreants who populate both Parties from getting into office, is to understand and master election gamesmanship and legerdemain and to find new ways to reach voters and get through the media propaganda assault on their very psyche. Even if your intentions, philosophy, and character are truly good, so that truly informed people would choose you if they knew the truth, the path to victory isn’t to simply hope your “truth” will speak for itself.

The “truth” is not enough under the current electoral system, which is geared toward rewarding legerdemain, media corruption, and dirty tricks more than a straightforward and accurate comparison of the intentions, philosophy, and character of the candidates. You can be labeled horrendous things even if this isn’t who you are or you can be labeled awesome things even if you are far from awesome.

While fighting the electoral battle, using all the means to hand, should never be off the table, building freedom must depend on strategies that go beyond this reliance on election outcomes. If you are frustrated at election outcomes, the answer is both to get better at playing the actual electoral game but, even moreso, building relationships, associations, and structures that unilaterally liberate as much of your economic and physical life from the control of politics as possible.

The Dire Need For Extended Kinship Beyond The Nuclear Family

Why are things like marriage, the nuclear family, and happy childhoods so under threat of extinction and what did we all get wrong in raising our own children too quickly, at age 18, become autonomous beings cut off from the family home?

We emphasize freedom. But most people think freedom is purely an individual thing. However, in practical terms, if freedom is only an individual thing, then every lone individual or detached nuclear family stands as a sole figure against mega forces, like monopoly corporations and the central government, and the vagaries of life and nature, defenseless and vulnerable.

Freedom must necessarily include shared identity and the shared sovereignty to define that identity in terms and according to standards reflective of the individual’s beliefs, values, and convictions. This is not something the culture of today even grasps, which is why the atomization of individuals and their emotional and economic vulnerability is only getting worse.

This leads to the introduction of something we have lost in our culture, not merely an extended family of around 20 or so adults clustered near each other, but a cluster of such extended family groups consisting of around 120 adults which is self-contained, self-sustaining economic and sociocultural unit, a fractal of an entire nation or even an entire civilization.


The Shirehold

WE INTENTIONALLY PRACTICE EXTENDED KINSHIP  

People are not made to be isolated and separated. Life in the Kingdom is not just about what we do individually, but how we live with others. Our lifestyle is an expression of agape love in family, community, and collaboration. A Shirehold is an intentional multifamily extended household community in close geographical proximity.

From The 17 Protocols of Upadaria, Protocol Seven


Clustering together with people you warmly feel kinship toward is essential to both personal freedom and shared freedom that shields you from external influence and control that isn’t in your best interest. We can say, regardless of the politics of the hour, that without a deliberate restoration of this kind of extended kinship, at the scale of a tribal band or village, freedom itself will continue to fade and centralized top-down control will increase until we are all atomized cogs in a machine that uses us like a commodity.

When family as an idea lost that sense that it was, organizationally, a self-sustaining and self-contained socioeconomic unit, a fractal of the whole national people and of civilization, it became insular and fragmented. Only self-actualization and the benefits, of love and affection, for the individual mattered.

It’s not that tribal bands of around 120 adults and their extended households of around 15 adults didn’t in some way also emphasize these benefits to the individual. The more healthy ones did and likely endured for centuries. But in practical, material matters, the outsider would see them as economic or corporate bodies as well as social and cultural familial groups.

When people mostly see family as two adults under the same roof or a single person and children, and when they only “marry for love”, then the atomized little “family” is hopelessly weak and incapable of meeting its basic needs without dependency on external structures. When the FEELING of love decreases this “family” is split or when external pressures grow beyond what two people can bear, there is suffering and even a potential breakdown.

In the Upadarian sociocultural and spiritual belief system, what we call a Shirehold, as a community of individuals within extended multi-family household groups, is for us the essence of family and such family ought to cluster together in the same physical space wherever possible. As some say, “family can be anything you want”, we agree, and while we certainly don’t want to compel anyone to adopt our Shirehold model for what family means, we also desire to be free and do so in peace.

Extended multi-family kinship groups connected to each other as a community of such groups, what we call a Shirehold, is for us the core constituency for our civilization. It, and only it, is a fractal of the whole civilization. While the individual, the nuclear family, and the kinship group of around 20 or so adults are essential elements of the Shirehold, the Shirehold is for us the true family. It is this and nothing less than this.

We are not proposing that people who don’t buy into this and whose idea of family differs aren’t families. Family, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. But for us, family isn’t its elements alone, like the individual and a nuclear family, it is this collaborative and mutualist community of around 120 adults who have a high degree of organic cohesiveness.

The argument against, say, having a cluster of around 30 to 50 nuclear families and related single adults living in the same space exclusively together, is rooted in the fair housing law. This law is in many ways perfectly useful, in principle and spirit. It prevent discrimination in housing. But its focus is too narrow, it isn’t based on the core fractal of human civilization. This fractal isn’t the nuclear family, it is these 120 adult extended kinship communities.

A Shirehold estate of a few houses and apartments belonging to a mutual benefit corporation owned by Shirehold members is essentially a self-contained sociocultural and socioeconomic body or, as we say, the core constituent entity and fractal of human civilization. Without this fractal being alive and well, civilization will further devolve in every way. Atomization leads to dissolution.

As noted, what we call the Shirehold is the smallest possible fractal of an entire civilization. Our concept of pluralism is based on kinship groups of people who cluster together as a household community, that is, a self-sustaining sociocultural and socioeconomic fractal of civilization.

Throughout history, most of these tribal bands of around 120 or so adults had a form of kinship not connected to blood. In most cases where remains can be tested, where one of these bands existed, the blood ties of their members were not prevelant. In other words, kinship wasn’t usually limited to blood kin. Wheoever shared your values and shared in the common good was kin.

There are potential pitfalls and real tradeoffs in seeking to revive this extended multi-family household community in the form of something like a Shirehold community.

In the past, extended multi-family households tended to relegate women to menial roles, though this was neither universal nor essential to the model. Additionally, there is the problem of feeling surrounded and suffocated or even feeling controlled or limited. This isn’t a feature of healthy Shireholds, by whatever name you call them, but of unhealthy ones. Stratified gender roles and interference with individual spiritual sovereignty are not essential to or an inevitable feature of these tribal bands, extended multi-family household communities, or, as we call them, Shireholds.

But it is true that when you decide to be connected to other people there are some seeming limits on your own scope of choices. The tradeoff of total individual autonomy is loneliness and vulnerability to mega corporations and the government, against whose mechanisms of influence and control you have no defense.

Shireholds would be massively empowering to individuals, give you more say in the social and cultural as well as economic milieu of your life than ever before, and shield you from external mechanisms of influence and control that pressure you to conform to things not suitable to your interests or values.

They would, however, spell the end of your lone ranger life and require some level of commitment and participation in the lives of others. Nothing good is free of any cost or inconvenience, but the tradeoff is always well worth the cost. The benefits are far greater than whatever you have left behind.

We argue that something like a Shirehold community is essential to the individual, marriage, the nuclear family, and childhood. It is also essential to a prosperous, healthy, and free society. If we desire to build freedom anew we have to find a way to develop these intentional Shirehold communities based on some form of organic cohesiveness that is strictly based on freewill participation by consensus among equal peers.

Around 120 adults, and whatever other connections they have as a body to other adults, living in close harmony, both physically and spiritually, both socioculturally and economically, is the core fractal and constituent entity of any nation of people, of the area-wide Ecclesia as a spiritual city-state of the Elect, of any country, of any civilization, and of the entirety of human civilization.

This is a shared conviction and value, it’s neither a doctrine nor a proposed law. The same concept of a single house or apartment and a single nuclear family applies to these Shirehold communities which may include 30 or 50 houses/apartments in a clustered living space with its own economic and material self-reliance resources capable of ensuring the physical well-being of every member. Legally, the ability of individuals to form such communities as an extended multi-family household community based on some form of adoptive kinship, should be as sacred as any human right.

The ability and power to choose and be part of a clustered living arrangement of around 120 adults who have a shared kinship of some kind must be asserted and respected by the greater society as it should any form of family people desire. The arbitrary limitation on what constitutes a family is a form of intolerance and bigotry against a broad spectrum of choices each individual should be free to make.

An entire book could be written about the Shirehold: what it is, why it must exist, why it is essential to Christian culture and a Biblical lifestyle, what its advantages and costs are, its governance in the modern world, its structures and functions, and why its right to exist must be codified into laws which only envision single home “families” and which do not take into account multi-house familial living arrangements where “family” is much larger than a nuclear family.

We do not propose these Shireholds as a racial or genetic construct: they would best be purely voluntary freewill participatory kinships based on a shared identity rooted in a common set of beliefs, values, and convictions. In our case, we propose a form of intentional spiritual nationhood within the larger universal nationhood of all Believers in Yeshua.

Our ideal communities are pluralistic communities made up of diverse individuals and nuclear families who still use the Western model of individualism and diverse clustered living estates or neighborhoods for different types of multi-family extended household communities, what we call Shireholds.

The only reason we want these estates, which are where Shireholds would cluster together, to be more or less exclusive to members of the same Shirehold is because, for us, a Shirehold is the basic family unit, while the individual, the nuclear family, and the kinship group are all elements of this family unit.

We recognize the danger of discrimination in housing, but this danger can be mitigated through a legal limit on the size of an estate, much as a single house can limit who lives there. An estate conjointly owned through a mutual benefit corporation whose shares must be owned by people of the same Shirehold, for instance, doesn’t discriminate any more than a single house occupied exclusively by members of the same nuclear family.

We further recommend that a Shirehold estate have space for helping internal refugees and asylees as well as offer housing and retail space to the public to offset costs for members. These housing options would certainly not discriminate in any way.

Regardless of all that, people clustered together as an extended multi-family household community of around 120 adults will form the basis of the emergent civilization. These structures will endure through whatever upheavals and crises will come because the old and dying civilization that surrounds us continues its detachment and atomization.

The development of these Shireholds as our basic family model and their eventual clustered living lifestyle as a single self-contained and mutually self-reliant sociocultural and socioeconomic body of people is essential to building resilient freedom. The ultimate proof against corporate and/or government gigantism and centralized control of your life is the restoration, in modern form, of what were once self-contained tribal bands.

Main

Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!

Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here