April 2, 2026

Inspiration & Empowerment

10 Tips for Immigrants Coming To America

 

This week, we have a quick piece by guest author Ted Rhodes…..

 

10 Tips for Immigrants Coming To America

By Ted Rhodes

 

Here are ten reasonable instructions for immigrants who aspire to come to America.  This message is for travelers from overseas, asylum seekers, people residing in this country on work or student visas, and green card holders. All of this is obviously apparent.  These rules are self evident, and should not even need to be expressed. But it has become blatantly apparent that this must be said.  So if you want to immigrate to America, follow these simple rules:

  1. Do not sneak into this country across our borders.  Come to our country through a legal port of entry, or apply for asylum at the American consulate in your home country.
  2. Do not seek asylum under false pretenses.  By decree of the United Nations, you seek asylum to flee a genuine threat to your life, not to flee from poverty.  Don’t let your first act as an American immigrant be a lie.
  3. Learn to speak English.  We don’t expect you to be fluent at the college level, but you should be able to get around reasonably well, read a ballot, and read a news article about the candidates up for election.
  4. If you want to immigrate into this country, and you want to be an American, then be an American.  You owe your allegiance to America now.  Bring us those treasured gifts of your culture, but leave the country you left behind.
  5. Once we have invited you here on a work or student visa, or on a green card, understand that you are here on a provisional basis. Behave yourself, obey our laws, and show us that you will be a good citizen who will contribute to the betterment of our country.
  6. Do not come here to start trouble with disruptive protests.  This is not the time.  Your task right now is show us that you belong here to join us as Americans. Once you become a naturalized citizen, we welcome you to peacefully exercise your First Amendment rights.
  7. Leave your tribalisms and your racial and sectarian bigotry behind.  Do not bring your wars onto our shores.
  8. You left your home country for a reason. Leave the ugly traits of the country you fled.  Do not come here to change our laws to fit your religion, to sex traffic  children, to subjugate our women, to murder homosexuals, nor to traffic drugs to our children and our citizens.
  9. If we catch you rioting in our streets, we will deport you.  ICE authorities will facilitate your removal, but it’s We The People who deport you.  You are not welcome here in our homeland.
  10. Fly the flag of your home country with pride. But fly the American flag above the flag of your home country. You are Americans now.  Do this of your own free will and from your heart, not as a simple formality in order to game citizenship.
freedomist banner
Why I Have Been A Sucker: Lying Liars Always Surprise Us

Like the Trojans who soon learned to be wary of Greeks bearing gifts, and of wooden horses in general, I have been all too surprised when my opponents have wrapped their deceit in a sweet promise, all to get through my gates and take advantage of me. But is becoming cynical and not trusting another living soul the solution to this problem?

I want to speak to this from the perspective of one who has had Greeks piling out of wooden horses into my life to cause chaos all too many times.

I have been taken advantage of in life by lying liars who always surprise me when they don’t say what they mean and when they don’t mean what they say. Taking people at face value only, sometimes the next day, to find they meant none of it, happens because for me not being transparent and honest is a gross mark of uncivilized behavior that threatens to render us worse than the most rabid and diseased of starving predators let loose in the paddock!

I remember being ambushed in a large, critical proposal meeting when I learned, to my shock, that sone of the participants were prepared to use deception, lies, and mischaracterization to shoot fake holes in my proposal, mostly by diseneguinely seeking “proof” any professional knows is irrelevant and impolitic to even ask. Indeed their questions belied their own vaunted skills as no professional person would ever ask such drivel!

The mark for their fraud was a technologically-challenged person who was impressed with their word salad, but who also failed to disclose that these people were actually in direct competition for their spending. I didn’t get the contract but the “mark” didn’t get anything like the results I could have given him and the entire effort remains, it seems, stalled.

(I have not forgotten this unethical performance nor the bad actors who played the lead roles.)

This doesn’t amount to a claim I never lie or exaggerate, nor that I don’t think there are times when deceiving the other side is essential and morally justified. I have been engaged in military intelligence subterfuge and levels of opposition research and guerilla marketing tactics against real bad guys for which I lose not a single wink of sleep. Deceptive tactics against bad guys are justified in this war against the freedom takers just as military actions amount to unacceptable violence in normal discourse but they are acceptable in war.

Have I lied under pressure and strain? Yes. But I felt awful and more often than not, when feasible, I have made it right, even to my embarrassment. I find being disenegnuine to be very disturbing and I am hardest in myself. I don’t like it and, what is a problem for me, I really don’t expect it.

Recently a client wanted me to assure them I could be certain about something I wasn’t certain about. I would have looked good to say yes and there is no way they would know, but I adamantly refused and told them nobody could know at this stage. Just as when I was young I could never back down from a fight because I would literally preder death to being disrespected, I feel strongly that being disingenuous, let alone lying, and not being teansparent are things savages without a human soul might do, but I’d rather stop breathing this air than disrespect my own self by such a stoop.

Sometimes I am too transparent, people might say, but I find it best to let people know who and what I am upfront. I don’t want to find out later I invested so much in them and yet they can’t stand me or what I am about. I am not sure if my sometimes stupid transparency is better for my life and business overall, but, while I want to be liked, being liked for things I am not is akin to not liking myself, to disrespecting myself.

Don’t get me wrong, I am also good at keeping secrets and confidences. I have taught people who wish to report news that being a keeper of secrets is essential to the gig. If people can’t trust your “this is off the record”, sourced dry up. I know amazing things about famous events and people, many confided by said people, precisely because they know I don’t tell tales out of school.

I am getting better. Mostly, what I have begun doing is observing more what people do and using my own skills in opposition research to sort out fact from fiction, as opposed to just believing people. Sometimes people who know of me and my reputation for using the web in occasionally dark ways to sort fact from fiction ask if I have oppo’d them, to which I often say, “we’re talking, which means whatever you’ve done, I think we can do business.”

This is the thing about me you should know: while I won’t violate my confidence, or the law, any rule or norm that I find useless and that hinders me, I disregard. I am always willing to take things to a level of insanity my opponents cannot even imagine and usually if they figure this out, even if they are stronger and more dangerous than me, they choose avoidance over conflict. I generally won’t stop pursuing you until you make nice or I win.

And yet, I will accept even a loss, something difficult for me to admit, ever, rather than violate my commitment to honesty and transparency, unless I am engaged in a digital or political war, in which different rules of engagement apply.

What I have learned is that the number of people who will lie, who won’t tell you what they think, and who will hide their true motive and intent and other facts, such as they might be competitors acting as gatekeepers for a potential client, outweigh those who would never stoop that low. I don’t know what the ratio is, but I do know that the norm seems to be this penchant for lying liars to deceive and thieve their way through life, seeking unjust advantages they do not deserve.

We cannot take everyone at their word, people tell me. But while trying to validate and confirm what they say may be wise, and necessary, starting from a point of distrust doesn’t seem justified to me on moral grounds. If I had done due diligence in that proposal, I would have recognized that all the previous nice words were not legitimate, that I needed to keep things closer to my vest, and that I had better be prepared to expose their flaws and mistakes in a brutal takedown as soon as they started their pounce.

But living your life always expecting to be lied to, and about, and doubting people’s motives and intentions without a cause, just out of a default position of cynicism, doesn’t sound like a fun and happy existence. It also may reveal a bit of projection, albeit I am weary of how cheaply that claim of projection is used when you lack an argument for your ideas. I still take people at their word, but now I tend also to watch more closely for signs they are being truthful and I do certain due diligence meant to confirm the truth as opposed to assuming I will find the lies.

Perhaps if you too are often surprised at how badly people lie and deceive it is because you would not do so, in such a manner, for such important things, yourself. Perhaps you are projecting a certain innocence some may equate to naivety. But it is far better to occasionally be a sucker than to be a liar.

When Politics Fails

 

 

Despite the title, this article is not about politics, per se. Nor is it any kind of product endorsement. This is an advisory, drawn on current events. As well, these are strictly my own opinions, based on my own training and experience, and are not necessarily the position of FreedomistMIA.

I have frequently stated that fifteen or twenty years ago, I would never have imagined that this aspect of CBRN (Chemical/Biological/Radiological/Nuclear) would be what I would find myself advising people about. The first three, certainly: chemical spills happen all the time, as do pandemics (COVID is only the latest, and the one that hit me, personally), and as someone who both watched the real Chernobyl on the news when it happened, and received briefings on it later, accidents at nuclear power plants and storage areas are nothing to sneeze at.

But full-scale nuclear war, between Russia and the United States? In the early 21st Century? I’d have told you that Hollywood was no longer accepting derivative scripts like that.

Now, however, that very term is being tossed around blithely by many “leaders” in the world, and very seriously by one in particular. This has generated the usual, shockingly uninformed response from the shrill and the trolls, to scare people for the “lulz.”

So — I am going to talk to you about nuclear war, in order to inform you, rather than scare you.

The picture below is a “before and after” image of the city of Nagasaki, Japan, following it’s destruction by an atomic bomb on August 9, 1945. This was the “other” atomic bomb that week. I have been to the memorial site in Hiroshima (familial connection…on the Japanese side); should you, the Reader, ever get to Japan, you need to put it on your must-see list.

Just try to avoid going in the first week of August.

 

Nagasaki, Japan, before and after the atomic bombing of August 9, 1945.

This is the image most people have about nuclear war. That it is mostly wrong, is not something the wider news media is going to waste time talking to you about. The general consensus about nuclear war, as presented in such movies as The Day After, On The Beach, and Threads and reinforced by scientists of a certain political persuasion, is that after the bombs drop, those who live through that, will soon join the rest.

The reality is going to be closer to a downmarket, Road Warrior rip-off. No zombies; sorry.

While the notion of being turned into a shadow on a street by a nuclear blast is very real, the simple truth is that you have to be almost directly underneath the blast. For most Americans, that is simply not going to happen. To find out why, take a stroll through the Nuke Map website, and find the closest major city to you. This is one of the most educational sites of its kind on the internet, and a great companion to Alternate Wars’ World War 3 section.

Most people who live near a major urban area don’t actually live “in” said city, but in the surrounding suburbs. For example, I tell people that I live in “Dallas, Texas” – the reality is that I live well outside the city, itself; in fact, I don’t even live in the same county. That is a conscious choice on my part, because – in my heart of hearts – I never trusted the political leadership of the USA to not do something monumentally stupid, so I try to live outside target zones.

Nuclear weapons are expensive and complicated, so anyone deciding to fire one at an enemy long ago realized that they needed to think very carefully about targeting. Targeting enemy commands and military facilities are almost always not the first option, because – under the doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) – it was assumed that as soon as you launched your missiles, the other side would launch theirs. As a result, there was no point in targeting empty air bases and missile silo’s. Likewise, targeting command elements (i.e., the President, et al) was not a good idea, because if you succeeded, there was no one left to negotiate with. So, the target planners settled on “economic and communications nodes.”

In short – cities.

If you look at a map of almost any major city, there are almost always a confluence of major highways in or near the city centers, conveniently close to major office towers housing the headquarters of companies that control “war production industries“…meaning, essentially anything that can be useful in warfare…which is virtually everything.

But, what if you don’t live in one of these “target-rich environments“? If you live “out in the ‘burbs,” like me, at most, you will get a certain amount of damage to your home (unless you are staring directly at the blast when it goes off; that will make your life…problematic). If you live in an actual rural area, you might not notice that a nuclear event has happened, until your local emergency services suddenly turn out in force.

For those thinking that the recent “advisory” posters and videos from various governments around the country, warning you to head indoors and wait for instructions in the event of a nuclear attack, means that the government will actually tell you how they are going to save you in the aftermath…they won’t. Those poster’s job is to keep you off the roads, to lessen traffic jams caused by fleeing people.

In short, the government wants you done. Well done, that is.

So…The foregoing naturally begs the question: If you’re outside a target area, a nuclear exchange does happen, and you’re alive afterwards — what do you do?

First, you need to plan ahead. If you think that I mean that you should become a “prepper” – you would be correct. But – should you stay in place, or go somewhere else? You know your area and your neighbors better than I do. If you live in an apartment complex, I strongly recommend that you have a plan to go somewhere else.

I am in a position where I have options in several directions. Again, I did this deliberately. That said, if you think that you are in a good position to stay where you are, that’s what you need to do. Hitting the road after a nuclear attack is, obviously, a pretty dangerous undertaking, no matter how well-prepared you think you are.

In addition to the requisite stocks of food – which is cheap to start, if you start now, by simply buying a few extra cans of beans and vegetables, and bags of beans and rice with every grocery run – you need to think seriously about water. Getting a couple of 55-ish gallon drums, along with several hand-pumped water purifiers for hiking, is a good step.

Next, I have to insert a disclaimer: the following is NOT medical advice. Do NOT “experiment” with the following. Short of a nuclear attack, do NOT take these products without consulting your doctor. Neither myself, nor FreedomistMIA are responsible if you violate this warning.

You have been warned.

The only specifically anti-radiation drug available to the general public in a pre-attack environment is Potassium Iodide. This is used as a protective for the thyroid glads from certain forms of radiation. The link above is to the Mayo Clinic’s advisory page on the drug – read that THOROUGHLY before taking. Potassium Iodide can be bought either as a product called “IOSAT“, which is sold in packets of fourteen 130mg pills. These are perfectly fine to use, but I do not recommend them, because in my opinion they are too expensive, and not as useful as the alternative. The better option are sold as tablets, by the bottle, usually coming as c.140 tablets of 130mg each (the standard dosage for an adult) to each bottle. The reason for this is simple: the IOSAT box is only good for protection after a single detonation — what do you do on Day 12, post-Attack, when their is another explosion? It’s a distinct possibility. Buy the bottle.

As well – calcium supplements. These are the only reasonable measure to counter the effects of Strontium-90 exposure. While there is no cure for Strontium exposure, calcium supplements can help you maintain bone health, since Strontium competes with calcium in the body. Again, talk to your doctor.

Last – multivitamins. Should an attack happen, your stress levels and changes in diet will throw your body out of whack for some time, until you can settle into a new normal. Multivitamins can help regulate the nutrients your body needs in the short term. Again, talk to your doctor.

Next, you need to consider, right now, what your gardening potential is. Start looking up your gardening zone, to see what kinds of food crops you can put in. As well, learn sprouting, because it really will keep you alive. Likewise, check out THIS video, as well.

That last thing we’ll talk about here, is personal defense and protection.

While I am fairly certain that many of those reading this article probably possess firearms of some sort, you need to think carefully about how to organize you personal and family protection strategies. Even if you live in a hyper gun-controlled state, you still have viable firearms options, such as pump shotguns, lever- and bolt-action rifles, and revolvers. Don’t do anything to run afoul of your local governments, but arm yourself, if you haven’t already.

Lastly, don’t neglect first aid. There are several products readily available, at very low cost that will significantly increase your chances of survival. Your options in this regard are vastly better than what was available 20-odd years ago. Also, there are plenty of training videos out there, on YouTube; “Dr. Bones & Nurse Amy” is one of the best.

Finally — I am not writing this to scare you. Even though I do not know you, I want you to live, should a nuclear attack happen…because the chances are very good that you will survive the attack, itself, and likely in relatively good physical condition. I find the idea of a person who survives a nearby nuclear explosion dying because they were not prepared beforehand, out of depression and ennui induced by sources that they should be able to trust, to be offensive in the extreme. You don’t have to know every single thing that I know, but what you need to know is that, if the worst comes, you and your family can survive, if you just exert the effort now.

I hope this helps. Good luck, check your six and keep your powder dry.

 

Winning The War To Rebuild Freedom

The Answer To the Dangers of Authoritarian Decadence Is To Unilaterally Establish Community With Fellow Freedom Builders

The evils and dangers of authoritarian decadence are on display. Never before in the USA has the danger of freedom being extinquished been graver. For many, the answer seems to be to market freedom to the masses in the hopes of defeating the freedom takers.

For Peers of Upadaria, people who have adopted a unique but Christian spiritual nationhood, and Freedomists who embrace a Pledge of Common Unity, the answer isn’t marketing.

Marketing is meant to pursuade. Upadaria, as a spiritual nation and an international non-territorial Commonwealth, is not something to be marketed. It is more about making a logical case, drawing boundaries, and building community around our shared freedom-building ideas.

The goal is not to convince the majority that something is right. We are at a place where we must all be done “negotiating” about fundamental God-given spiritual sovereignty. We cannot negotiate things like the individual’s wyrd, which is a God-ordained scroll of destiny and purpose unique for each person.

Those who will join the cause or become allies will come forth and together will do exploits. Those who oppose will oppose and all that can be done is to leave them to God’s care.

There is a war on freedom caused by a civilization-wide leftward lurch toward authoritarian decadence. It is necessary to resist this, peacefully, and at least to protect the innocent and the righteous as much as possible. But it is also important to realize that authoritarian decadence is an unavoidable consequence of a civilization in spiritual, moral, cultural, and creative decline.

We live in the days of decline. Every major world civilization today is in a similar state of decline. The problem is way beyond America. It is a global problem.

Some believe elections will save us. If only we get the right people in we can defeat the bad guys, or so the logic runs.

In truth, and to be brutally honest, voting will not save us. Winning elections is not the real solution.

Voting is a power we use as best we can to stave off the greatest threat, the Democrats, who, as a Party, are far worse than the Republicans. The Republicans are not “good”, but their flaws are a minor crime compared to the Democrats.

(*Note, our litmus test is whether a politician will vote to ensure some sorts of status and shanding for Upadarians as a spiritual nation more than anything else and for our non-territorial international Commonwealth. This means, only under such circumstances, a Democrat who will vote for our status and standing would be preferable to a Republican who won’t.)

If voting is mostly just a holding action, what is the answer to our quandry?

The creation of community is the answer.

We who call ourselves Upadarians believe that a spiritual form of nationhood is the most viable way to build community. People intentionally adopt something we call “organic cohesiveness” through the agency of shared nationhood. For Freedomists, a Pledge of Common Unity provides a larger and more pluralistic foundation for collaboration and mutual support.

First we begin with spiritual nationhood. This is important because the stakeholders of our international virtual Commonwealth are conformed Peers of our spiritual nation (Electors).

Let’s dig into nationhood, cohesiveness, and that which makes all this organic.

How can a small group of people overcome large-scale problems that the majority do not even acknowledge as problems? The answer is that they need to be able to act in unity and with discipline and purpose. This is cohesiveness.

When a small group of people are extremely cohesive, the larger but less cohesive groups fall before them.

We aren’t interested in anyone falling before us. We are interested in not falling before the “popular” waves of moral barbarism and authoritarianism that the Democratic Party is all about.

The Democrats and their propaganda organs in the press, academia, Madison Avenue, Wall Street, and Hollywierd are totalitarian perverts. We don’t want to be ruled by their anticulture and their authoritarianism.

Republicans are not the noble and good opposite of the Democrats. They may be seen as either feckless opposition to the Democrats, sometimes collaborators, or slow motion corpostate shills. But they are not anything near a threat to us as the Democrats are.

A cohesive core of a minority of people is more than a match to the balkanized majority coalition the Democrats have cobbled together.

Cohesiveness is needed.

But our idea is that it should be oragnic. This means a few things. First, there is the idea it should come from the heart and be natural, not forced. It should have great depth such that any two people who have this organic cohesiveness instantly know they will almost always agree.

They will be able to predict how the other person will act or respond. They will know that honor and honesty are required as a prerequisite for being a Peer of our nation or a Freedomist in our Commonwealth.

This instant agreement is never forced, it flows from having the same core beliefs and values. It happens by making these shared ideals visible and transparent. It happens we agreement on these matters becomes the very qualification for claiming the shared identity.

What we call nationhood in many ways is “community writ large.” It is a shared identity that defines how those who adopt it will behave with one another and with reference to the outside world. It creates predictability and trust which would normally take a long time to build, thus making an effectice cohesive response difficult.

People adopt the Upadarian nationality when they learn the ideals, principles, practices, and goals that define this identity. These things are expressed through the 17 Protocols of Upadaria which guide the way we treat each other and the way we work together. Others, who we call Freedomists, agree to a Pledge of Common Unity by which they become Citizen Freeholders of our international Commonwealth.

(*Note, people who become Peers take a Pledge of Peers and automatically also agree to the Pledge of Common Unity. People who agree to the Pledge of Common Unity are not Upadarians by nationality and may not even be Christians, but they embrace the ideals and principles upon which freedom is built. Thus we have Peers and Freedomists.)

By this means, many small groups in many locations who gather under our banner can work autonomously. Meanwhile, it looks like a mass movement is being centrally organized and activated. In reality, aside from a support structure and a means of protecting the brand and providing standards, no such control exists.

Any larger scale hierarchy is captains of tens, fifties, hundreds, thousands, and etcetera. To pool resources and facilitate communication and cooperation across great distances and among millions of people some hierarchy is needed. Hierarchical structures with a light touch that support autonomous local groups are ideal.

Through the power of organic cohesiveness, even if that hierarchy was destroyed, a whole new organic hierarchy could emerge from any of the smaller pieces. These smaller peices, like groups of a few people even, become a fractal of the whole. They can then grow through cellular division into a new copy of the whole.

Imagine a small town of perhaps 5,000 adults. Imagine only 300 to 500 adults embracing our nationhood or at least virtual citizenship in our international Commonwealth, and building community amongst themselves. This “Microshire Community” or around 2-5 Shireholds would have an outsized INFLUENCE without asserting any control.

(*Note, the wors “Shirehold” combines the words “shire” and “hold”, as in household. It is a modern adaptation of the ancient tribal band or village in which some form of kinship connection is a condition of membership.)

Even when only a few dozen families share this identity as Peers of Upadaria or embrace the status of Freedomists within our Commonwealth, a lot of good can be done.

In that town, the likelihood any elected official would run afoul of these people is slim. If they voted en bloc, as a group, they would be courted, not persecuted. If they also were not interested in much more than basic human rights for all and to be left in peace to serve their God, they are also not any kind of threat.

Spiritual nationhood is the means of building organic cohesiveness within distributed intentional communities. This is the key to our peaceful and spiritual revolution.

While the degree to which Freedomists are cohesive with Upadarians may be lesser, it is substantial and chances are a Freedomist would engage in some other form of shared nationhood with others within the larger international Commonwealth.

This, or something like this by similar groups who love freedom, is the real solution to our problem. Our problem is authoritarian decadence promoted by a globalist corpostate establishment that has lost its very humanity.

We aren’t trying to convince the majority to reject this. We are not trying to win over the corpostaters or their minions. We will vote to hold the line and disrupt the use of political power as a weapon against freedom. At the same time, we will unilaterally build community through the agency of spiritual nationhood which creates organic cohesiveness.

Our goal is to find, inform, gather, and help yo organize Peers of Upadaria and eCitizens of our virtual commonwealth who are not Peers at the local level. By empowering them to autonomously build community together, we win back a tiny portion of the people and land for freedom.

Electors are confirmed Peers who are citizens of our non-territorial international Commonwealth. Freeholders are active eCitizens and confirmed Freedomists of our commonwealth. They are all called “Upos” and we believe they already exist. What lies before us is the task of calling them and serving them so that they can build their own local Upo Communities.

We use a term “Upoverse” to describe a social, economic, civil, and civic environment based on a new civilizational paradigm. By building the Upoverse online and then face-to-face at the local level, we win more people and spaces for freedom.

As others may do the same, albeit in their own ways, new alliances and coalitions emerge. These alliances and coalitions fly the same banner. It is a banner of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence and adherence to the same set of core ideals.

People who want freedom and who are destined to become Electors or Freeholders within our globally-distributed community already exist. We do not need to convince them. We need to reach them, gather them, and activate them.

The War Of Liberation Against The Globalist Corpostate

How To Defeat The Globalist Schwabian Marxian (Corpostate) Revolution and The War On Christianity and Freedom

The Corpostate revolutionaries are quasi-Marxian ideologues who desire to reset everything and start over with new patterns that will transform your life in ways that seem like they are a copy of the Book of Revelation.

The open borders, wokist agitation, alt-gendered and rainbow fascist anticulture, and sabotage of individual economic self-reliance and America economic independence, coupled with a war on Christianity, marriage, family, and community are the “reset” phase. It is an antichrist war on the Elect, a war on freedom which can itself only be upheld by virtue, liberty, and independence.

The aim of this top-down cabal of freedom takers is to destroy virtue, liberty, and independence.

They attack virtue through an alt-gendered hedonistic anticulture aimed at ending faith, marriage, family, and community. They assault liberty as defined in the original spirit and intent of the US Bill of Rights through “reinterpretation” and redefining “free speech” and all the other rights according to their wokist agenda. They assault independence through a top-down corpostate planned economy run by bureaucrats and CEO’s wherein “you will own nothing and like it.”

But this is just the reset phase.

Ultimately, the Marxian goal of ideologues like Klaas Schwab will also sweep aside most of the nonsense in the reset phase. In other words, the borders will be closed, Soviet style! All the alt-gendered and non hetero stuff will be set aside in favor of controlled reproduction. The godless authoritarian, humanist utopia will be achieved via a managed collectivism.

What seems to be different from the Schwabianites (Corpostaters whose ideas are aligned with Klaas Schwab’s World Economic Forum) and classic Marxists is that the Schwabianites make no pretense of local collective counsels or so-called “democracy.” They envision a small class of topmost leaders of immense wealth at the helm because most all people cannot make proper decisions.

Whereas the classic Marxist sees the state as the prime mover of forced human evolution, the Schwabianite sees the global monopoly corporations and money funds as, acting through the state, the new prime movers of forced human evolution.

In this schema, the corporate shot-callers hijack and use the state as a blunt instrument of coercive force. The classic Marxists eliminated the independence of the corporations and merged state and corporate power under the state. The fascists retained the corporations but harnessed them in such a way they essentially became government agencies but allowed their “owners” to retain some profit and autonomy to keep them functioning at the state’s behest.

The Schwabianites are monopoly corporatists. They use money funds forcefully contributed to by the producing classes (“retirment funds” and fractional reserve banking) to exercise their control over corporations. They see the apparatus of the state as a tool they own and control. Hence the godless “global corpostate” which they envision as the leading agent of their forced evolution and march toward a humanist garden of Eden without God.

Understand that there is no Schwabianite Council of 300 per se, through the World Economic Forum and special functions like the Davos Meetings and the Bilderberger meetings, do allow for coordination and collaboration. The thing that creates most comity of action is that all these people were reared and brainwashed from a youth into embracing this godless corpostate ideology.

Like the classic Marxists, the Schwabianites think somehow and in some way that their authoritarianism will ultimately give way to a voluntary embrace of their ideology. This will be adopted by people whose very nature has shifted from what they call selfishness to a collective selflessness.

Both envision the changing of human nature in such a way that people no longer pursue self-interest or that of their own kin or community but, rather, the collective whole. For the Schwabianites, this also means these newly evolved humans, a product of authoritarian and forced reshaping of human nature, also look to and trust their betters, the topmost rulers. These topmost rulers of course are the most benevolent and selfless and are groomed and qualified to rule because, as advanced as everyone else is, they are the most “woke.”

Schwabianites, of whom the Democratic Party are chief, have infected every institution, including the Republican Party and the church. They wage vicious war against anyone outside their ideological bent but especially people who are faithful to historic Christian orthodoxy and/or the original spirit and intent of the US Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights within it and the Declaration of Independence which presaged it.

Classic liberals and neoliberal libertarians are naive and weak and assumed a “live and let live” reality was possible or even existed while the Schwabianites understand and use the naked force of the state and of any institution they can control. They abuse whatever power they get and they actively seek to exclude all outside their ideological type from any position of power.

So-called “decency” is in fact a ridiculous and moronic approach to trying to fight these people. But as we engage these foul beings, and they are foul, they resort to force because their previous efforts to name call us into feeling afraid of being called a racist or something have now failed.

What of men like Mitch McConnell who claims to be a conservative?

He is a semi-Schwabiabite, neoliberal whose desire to be “decent and respectful” has neutered him. This man hates Trump not because of his ideas and peogram, but because of his crudeness and because his friends, actual Schwabianites, detest that man. Mitch has no moral and ethical true north per se, his aim is parochial, especially seen in the person of his wife. He thinks he can make accommodations and play by a set of arbitrary rules of engagement which the other side doesn’t limit itself to.

Mitch McConnell is a classic weak-minded neoliberal, controlled opposition who is tolerated despite genuinely disagreeing with the Schwabianites because, with few exceptions, he has always been outsmarted by them.

This doesn’t mean Mitch is a bad man. His habits and tactics were born in a different time, a time when the Schwabianites were seeking “tolerance”, before the “forced celebration phase” and where we are now, the “forced participation” phase. Mitch cannot fathom the possibility that his opponents, and he is not one of them (to his credit), actually want to eliminate people like him AFTER they have discarded a substantial portion of the people he should be aligned with, including Trump and his supporters.

One can criticize Trump for his crude behavior and poor leadership, his ability to gather and lead a strong and loyal team is almost nil. But we can also realize that those trying to literally throw him in jail are only doing so because Trump has been far more effective against them than any Republican since Reagan.

We need to rally around Trump, even if we think he could “be better”, because Trump is merely the figurehead to these people, but we who refuse to bow to the Schwabian gods of Marxian Authoritarian Utopianism are the actual target. Once they “get Trump” they will paint us all as little Trumps, and that will eventually include Mitch and company.

This reality of power is something we must take cognizance of and we must be willing to use whatever power, authority, and influence we have to ruthlessly combat the Schwabianites and their cohorts. We must engage the neosoviets, the wokists, and the alt-gendered rainbow fascist coalition, including shunning, shaming, and disowning them and removing them from power by any legal means necessary.

The goals of the Schwabianites are lightly hidden, but only by those who are truly asleep (the “woke” are actually the most asleep!), but clear as day to anyone who has eyes to see. These globalist goals REQUIRE the destruction of America and the Christian faith especially, forged through the destruction of community, family, and marriage.

As insane as it may sound, these people actually think they can impose this Marxian Authoritarian Utopianism on a global scale. Their desire is to remove all differentiation, by nation, country, religion, gender, and etc, to atomize every individual (cutting communityz family, and marital ties) so they can become a non-differentiated cog in their top-down collectivist machine.

Most of the people bowing to Schwab’s gods, even though few either know who he is or would acknowledge him as leader, are essentially clout chasing and virtue-signaling for approval and favor. It is ironic how these wokist alt-gendered freaks who detest all things hetero, white, and Christian, are touting EXACTLY what the Schwabianite billionaires are pushing and yet imagine they are heroically swimming against an oppressive tide.

The solutions are faith-based alternatives to the financial, material, social, and cultural structures and institutions and a passionate drive toward real self-determination and self-governance through self-sustaining families and intentional collaborative communities. Everything we need to function and survive, from food and energy to even trade scrips and financial transactions, must be provided through structures that are run by and for Christians and Judeo-Christian traditionalists who love freedom.

Build new stuff: businesses, non-profits, churches, families, and communities as well as novel structures like our approach, which is to intentionally create a Christian civilization starting with a spiritual nation whose God is the Lord and a Commonwealth of freedom builders. Next, be prepared to use whatever power, authority, and influence you have, including voting and any economic sway you can muster, to propel the righteous into power and to exclude and shun the wicked.

The Unbelievably Powerful Threat Addiction Poses

ADDICTION IS DEADLY AND EXTREMELY DIFFICULT FOR ANYONE TO CONQUER

Addiction is no joke. It’s not just “well, then stop using!” Judging people and condemning them won’t help at all. It’s awful.

By the grace of God you may not have any life-controlling addictions. Perhaps any addictions one may say you do have are not dangerous to your health and don’t cause you to act in a dangerous way.

But for some, addiction is dangerous and hard to break. The brain itself works against you and is surrounded as it were by a controlling net that supercedes your logic and your freewill. Your brain craves that which could kill you.

People struggling with life-controlling addictions, however they got there, generally don’t have enough willpower in themselves to overcome that drive.

Dealing with people that have addictions is hard. Everything they say is suspect, even if they sincerely mean it and intend to do as they say they will. It feels to them you don’t trust them and you see them as a lesser being, but the truth is that until an addiction is some years in the rearview mirror, that draw is so powerful it can often lead that person to act in ways they don’t want to.

The creation of a living space where addicts cannot access their drug of choice, are under medical and mental health supervision, and can engage in a process of discovery and self-improvement is essential. This probably needs to be a whole year to a year and a half and gainfully “employ” them so they don’t have much time, almost like a boot camp like period and what you go through in the military for your initial specialty training, although not military style.

One concept is a role-playing immersive learning experience in which the patient builds a persona, even a different name, that connects to a fictional storyline, and that becomes an expression of their true inner self sans their old baggage, including their addiction and what led to it.

What if the best way to help such people overcome is for them to experience, even in imagination and if necessary in a VR enhanced situation, their truest innermost self in all its potential instead of merely rehashing why they became an addict?

Certainly, once they are strong in this new persona and begin to really translate the imagined self to their real life self, they will become strong enough to wrestle with and overcome the things that led them to addiction.

Some people don’t like the idea “once an addict, always an addict”, some people believe both in supernatural healing and in novel methods, such as this role-playing immersive learning experience, by which one may eventually get to a place where the draw of addiction decreases or nearly disappears.

Anyone can become an addict, whether they never have or if they have been free for decades. The danger of addiction is something we ought to teach even our children, in the strongest and possibly most graphical way possible.

Once one becomes an addict, we can choose to treat this as a mental illness and try to help, without becoming victims of bad behavior and abuse by the addict, or we can judge and pretend this is somehow beneath us and they are beneath us.

 

 

 

 

Change Your Thinking, Or Your Mind’s Channel, When Feeling Pain and Sorrow

Be careful with things that frustrate, bring regret, or make you wish you were someone else. In short, change your thinking in order to find happiness even in times of painful circumstances and loss.

Life can make you feel pain, sorrow, and deep depression when you face things and see others around you seemingly untouched by such things. A person who cannot walk may feel angry at the universe or God because they see others around them walking and wish they could too. They can become so focused on that they may miss the things they can do that others can’t.

When you start to feel this way, change the subject in your head. Go read your Bible, find and ingest wholesome content, use your talents to write or draw, or even play a video game. Avoid content that refocuses you on your problem: if you are a girl and just got dumped by your boyfriend, now may not be the time to watch romance comedies unless that actually cheers you up (which it probably won’t).

Do anything but let yourself dwell on that thing, because things we cannot control but focus on our frustration about can be crazy making. Dwelling on things in your life that are sad and painful, at times when you cannot take action on them, is never fruitful.

Often we try to psyche ourselves out a bit, like somehow we can rationalize or understand our source of sorrow, as if this will change it. It may be good to get to a point of understanding, if it is possible, but it’s not the best and most consistent way to handle that pain in the long term.

The key is not to psyche ourselves out but to simply look at something else. A Jewish friend once told me that when he was depressed his Rabbi told him to “go and count your money.” I misunderstood this to think he was being shallow. But the man had money and all the Rabbi was doing was showing him how to refocus on the good things in his life.

This man had experienced a love rejection and was so focused on that he was spiraling downwards. He counted his money and his mind changed its channel. It didn’t erase his sadness, but it decreased the burden and eventually he was able to find love again, which would have been hard if he had stayed in his funk feeling sorry for himself and imagining only sorry and rejection were his fate.

You become what you are looking at. The lesson with my Jewish friend wasn’t “money brings happiness”, his Rabbi explained, it was to focus on anything positive about your life and to give your mind and heart a vacation from the pain and sorrow.

I knew someone with cancer who was relatively young and who faced a bad prognosis, and yet they seemed happy. I asked them how they could be happy, suspecting the answer they would give, and I was not surprised. Basically, they said they don’t think about that, they don’t even focus on tomorrow or any time down the road. They live their best life here and now and when that dark cloud of comparing their life to others comes, they do anything it takes to get their mind busy doing and thinking about something else.

They lived far more years than anticipated but eventually passed, albeit never with regrets and always staying in the moment.

By changing what they looked at, from the pain and loss to happy things, they became more happy.

Happiness is not even mostly circumstantial. I’ve met people who experience great pain every day due to some serious medical condition who were mostly still happy, but I’ve also met people who were mostly unhappy whose circumstances were not pleasant but not nearly as severe as these other folks. What I saw different in them was more the things they spent time doing and ingesting or imagining than anything else.

Even in my own life I have had real depression dealing with some circumstances that were painful and yet not as bad as I imagined but yet as I grew and gained more wisdom, worse circumstances came and yet I could say some of those times I was much happier than in those less trying circumstances. There are times when the deepest painful situation happens and yet other good things are also happening because I choose to focus on them and the overall sense of joy and happiness is greater.

Most of this, with faith in God an eternal view of life as a foundation, was effectuated by the simple expedient of changing the channel in my mind.

This is not a perfect solution that will prevent you from ever feeling the pain or sorrow of your situation, or that of a loved one. But if it can reduce 70% of the amount of time you consciously sit in that, then it is worth trying.

Don’t get cynical. The saying by Nietschze that whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger seems superficially true, but it is a cynical and pessimistic saying. First, “being stronger” is neither a goal nor a source of happiness and, second, wholeness, our deepest need, can come from that which not only doesn’t kill us but brings us joy.

Back to the man who eventually died from cancer. He was able to focus on what gave him joy, and even as his choices narrowed, he never stopped searching for that which gave him joy in the moment. He once said that because of his terminal diagnosis he was given many opportunities to speak into people’s lives, which gave him great joy in the moment, and this joy he imparted to others who were made stronger in love, not just some horrid trial by fire that almost killed them.

We all have been given a life and circumstances all meant to mold and shape us into the people God ultimately desires us to be for eternity. For every tear we shed while remaining in the faith, God rewards us. One day, therefore, some of the people you may think got short-shifted in this life will be seen as having been given the greatest opportunity to experience a depth of oneness with Christ that not everyone seems to get.

Many of the people who I have met who have experienced great tragedies, some enduring for decades, have shown me truths and principles for living that have made me better and stronger. They did not begrudge me the fact my circumstances were better and that I could benefit from the wisdom they earned through great sacrifice and loss without me having to experience that loss.

Change your mind’s channel from your pain and suffering, inasmuch as you can, through the simple expedient of taking some action to encumber your mind’s time with something else. Why sit in the pain any longer than is necessary?

The Balanced Approach To Our Deepest Need

ON WHOLENESS: Our Deepest Need

By Bill Collier- Innermost wholeness is the deepest need upon which all love and fear are based. For many, inner wholeness is limited to self, some see themselves and their sense of wholeness within a larger sphere, and few have a very large to epic sphere wherein they experience wholeness from within and from among those whom they value as an extension of themselves.

It is good to start with and remain fixed upon personal inner wholeness because as your circle of care grows, you have less and less active control, which, if your inner wholeness is off will make the dissatisfaction and disappointments within outer circles of care more painful than they would otherwise be.

If all you have is this inner wholeness you may have a certain contentment even in hardship, but your impact on the world will be very low which, ironically, can upset your inner wholeness. If you do not have an inner sense of wholeness then as you seek wholeness in the outer circes of care you will both have more frustration and you will need to find ways to control others so they harmonize with what you think brings wholeness to them.

Balance is needed, but understand we can retain our inner wholeness even when it is more difficult to extend to our outer circles of care, but even with that we will experience pain, loss, and sorrow which cannot be avoided.

We can talk about where inner wholeness comes from, including spiritual, mental, and physical needs and the sources of meeting those needs. Likewise for outer circles of care there are similar sources and aspects of wholeness.

If you understand wholeness and that wholeness is deeper even than feelings like pleasure and pain, and can be experienced even in times of pain, then you understand why doing whatever makes you happy (gives you a pleasure sense of “happy”) will not necessarily make you whole, not as God intended.

Solutions To Keep Your Home Air Clean
1. BE CAREFUL ABOUT WHAT YOU ALLOW INTO YOUR HOME

The number one thing you can do for the air quality inside your home is to become aware of the products you use and what you bring into your home. Avoid using toxic cleaners, aerosol sprays such as hairsprays and toxic beauty products, air fresheners, candles, and insecticides containing harmful VOCs that are released into the air.

Purchase non-toxic furniture and mattress that are free from flame retardants and synthetic materials when possible. Making changes to purchase clean products can feel overwhelming, but I would suggest making small changes at a time. When you run out of a certain cleaner or beauty product, replace that item with a clean version instead of throwing out everything at once.

2. USE AIR FILTERS

Using a home air purifier is one great way to keep the air clean inside your home. I personally recommend the brand Air Doctor, which utilizes UltraHEPA filtration technology to filter out larger particles such as dust, dander, viruses, bacteria, and mold, as well as a carbon filter, which will remove gasses such as VOCs. The Air Doctor will automatically adjust to the air quality of your home and will increase filtration when necessary, such as after cooking.

3. CONSIDER PLANTS

There are many plants that help reduce bacteria, VOCs, and mold, such as snake plants, golden pothos, philodendrons, lady palms, and peace lilies.

4. AVOID WEARING SHOES IN THE HOUSE

Wearing shoes indoors makes it easy to track in pathogens such as bacteria and viruses as well as pesticides from lawn maintenance.

5. IMPROVE VENTILATION

Opening your windows when cooking, painting, or remodeling helps to remove indoor air pollution.

Why Ronald Reagan Would Have Been A “Upadarian”

Ronald Reagan defeated the Soviet Union. He understood the times in which he lived, the hour of visitation, and the real crisis facing the free world. He was able and willing to evolve and grow and learn from his mistakes and always sought to be on the cutting edge of the advancement of freedom for all peoples, not just Americans. It is for this reason, as we consider the true threats to freedom and the radical necessity of the hour, that we are convinced Ronald Reagan, had he known about our vision for a new civilization emerging within people’s hearts and lives, would have identified with what we call Upadaria as a shield against the evil empire of our day, namely the authoritarian phony wokatarians and their corrupt corpostate ruling class.

Let’s start with what a Upadarian is. The word is pronounced “you pah darian” and comes from what we propose are the four core ideals of Christian civilization. These ideals are a balanced understanding and application of Unity in diversity, Popular sovereignty, Democratic equality, and Rule of law within the framework of historical Christian moral and doctrinal orthodoxy.

The concept behind what we call Upadaria is basically the idea that we can intentionally create a nationality based on these ideals and then principles and practices stemming from them to sow the seeds for a Christian civilization within our own hearts, lives, families, and communities.

A Upadarian is someone who embraces things like the four core ideals, historic Christian moral and doctrinal orthodoxy, principles such as liberty based on the original spirit and intent of the US Bill of Rights, and the call to both be a witness and influence for Yeshua to the nations and to provide aid to Christian refugees. A Upadarian is someone who seeks to restore to social fabric of faith and family within communities based on trust and freewill participation within a free and pluralistic society of equals.

The radical necessity of the hour is to unilaterally build alternative connections, relationships, associations, and structures together, based on a new intentional nationality that transcends things like race or politics, to shield people from the rapacious and freedom taking powers that be and thereby build a global movement as a witness and influence for Yeshua to the nations.

Ronald Reagan understood that America was a city on a hill. Sadly, he would realize today that this land and its institutions have fallen prey to a darkness of moral degeneracy and authoritarianism coupled with petty corruption and graft. An evil empire has emerged and taken root from within our system and only the building of a sort of empire of freedom from within our homes and neighborhoods can counter this threat.

Reagan knew God was the source of freedom and only through faith in God could we build a free society that was just to all people, leaving nobody behind. He did what he could, but no doubt, being a man often ahead of his time, he would have realized that the mantle of freedom must pass to a new effort. This effort is not predicated on the political state as his efforts were but, rather, on a form of nationhood that doesn’t depend upon or isn’t easily controlled by what has devolved into a corrupt corpostate system.

Reagan would realize that as in his day it was America a political state versus the USSR that today it is Upadaria a spiritual nation versus a global corpostate system. The great challenge of his day was to end the USSR, the great challenge of our day is to build a parallel sociocultural construct with its own social, cultural, and economic arrangements and organizations that will essentially shelter people from today’s evil empire and eventually challenge that evil empire.

In short, because he was a proud American, a Christian, and a conservative who had a heart for the downtrodden and disadvantaged, Reagan would have proudly been a Upadarian, if not in formal name, definitely in spirit and intent of its meaning.

Main

Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!

Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here