Xi XingPing Thought to Be Mandatory Reading for Children in China

Paul Collier September 10, 2021

Xi Xinping has issued a decree in China that has instantly become law with the full force of policing ready, able, and willing to execute violent consequences should anyone dare defy it. He has issued a decree that your neighbor will not protecy you from when the police knock on your door. He has issued a decree that will gain the instant overwhelming approval of the public faces of the people you see everyday in your daily living.

I juat want to give you a sense of the scope of the control one man holds over a nation that is the 4th largest in terms of land size and number one as far as population in all the world, a major nation-state in the world to be sure, if I can use such lowkey expressions to reflect the true scope of the current geo-economic power the nation-state of China currently possesses on the world stage.

This decreee is about assuring that the children of China, all being sent to mandatory government schools (homeschooling is not a real option, though underground homeschools exist), be taught the new dictates of the demigod-esque leader of China, Xi Xinping, a man we simply refer to as Chairman Xi as it fits the pattern of perhaps his biggest influence as we are seeing this man emerge, Mao Zedong (though his Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is not exactly the same as Chairman Mao’s).

The similarities have more to do with the type of legitimization of power that both men relied upon, which was an apppeal to the ancient Chinese doctrine of the Middle Kingdom, the place where heaven and earth meet, China, and in this exchange of human and nature, the will of heaven is seen in the fruit of the people and the land. This is commonly referred to as the mandate of heaven, and while Chairman Xi is more explicit in this, and more willing to directly refer to the ancient traditions where this ideal was formed and tested, Mao Zedong utilized the terminology of Marx to describe the same type of thing, but instead of the mandate of heaven it was the mandate of the people, only by the people he was only referring to revolutionairies, for everyone else was part of the problem. Mao was no traditionalist.

There are many parallels that can be drawn to the efforts of Chairman Xi to indoctrine the chilldren to think like the party, and the party is Xi, make no mistake about that, and what the DNC is attempting to do by indoctrinating children to think like the party, the DNC. Those similarities have to do with the types of claims Xi and the DNC Apparatchik Class utilize to validate the use of coercion against people for havng opinions or claims of truth that challenge the official party narrative.

The DNC has a particular moral construct it finds useful in undermining the vehicle of power of its opponents, which are very different than the type of opponents the CCP finds itself facing. The DNC has risen to power exploiting the plea of the most needy in the land within contexts that had not been given such hyper focus and concern (not in the polls, however, where economony consistently still rates at the top most all of the time) until the last 10 years, with the last two years seeing an escalation of hyper-consensequential racist and bigoted violations of the new party code.

Now charges of racism and bigotry are as powerful at ending the viablility of a person’s life as being called a witch was back in the early 1600s. The parallels between that reign of moral panic terror and this one are so rich and deep that I have little doubt there will be many books written on those parallels for, perhpas, decades to come, maybe more. It is an extraordinary time in the scope of human history. This is is not a drill, we significantly live in extraordinary times.

The use of failure to meet social orthodoxy is the fundamental method of control that’s being deployed here. This is a tactic hardly ever used effectively to control a large-scale audinece if the faction using this method does not control to 80 percent or more all of the fundamental social and culture affirming, creating, and protecting institutions of the land. These would be the banks, the board rooms, the Federal government, the media, the schools, the news, and emerging tech.

I believe the DNC Empire, if I can call it that, because its coalition of power really does comprise distinct ‘provinces’ that preserve distinct characteristics only bonded by the usefulness of a larger scale structure of support. has such a level of control on the land today here in America, across the board, at 80 percent or more, but that Empire is not the Kingdom that Xi currently rules (though they have begun to venture into their own Empire building, something we have been tracking for a while now).

China is a Kingdom of 99 percent one ‘race,’ the Han race, and Xi and the Middle Kimgdom aims to keep it that way. People there mostly fit within a socially orthodox visual range of acceptable visual characteristics. China is the very type of nation-state the DNC claims to be against, an ethno-state. Yet their alliance still makes perfect sense to me for, like the CCP that Xi derives his legitiamcy of power partially from (it’s ultimately from the mandate of heaven), both parties use the tool of socio-cultural orthodoxy, but one is using it to take power and the other is using it to keep power.

Xi appeals to the moderately well-off Chinese. He is a conservative, and in a profoound sense as well, for he is seeking to revitalize the teachings of Confucius, he is appealing to the ancient history of China and its traditions as the base of his power, and the base of power for China in becoming the new leader of the world.

The DNC is still largely in the insurrectionist role, at least socio-culturally, for, while they have achieved great gains in conditioning society to be much more reflective of DNC values (some of which will still ultimatly be part of their undoing and many on the ‘right’ now opposed to some of those changes will ultimately be happy they happened), they still have yet to undo within the bulk of Americans the sense of one might call rights entiitelment that comes from growing up in a land in which you perceive (in part rightly, in part falsely) that appealing to the rights iterrated in the Bill of Rights is enough to shut down whole police departments, is enough to give families of victims of those whose rights have been violated, millions for the harm.

So they appeal to the moral violations that affect their ‘constituency,’ the people who perceive (to some degree rightly, to some degree falsely) that the way things are is a fundamental threat to their potential to live lives of their own choosing (thoughn they rarely think of it in those terms, more often equating their preferential way of living to THE morally correct way of living that everyone must comply with or face coercive consequences). They set to flame whatever moral vulnerabilities the current socio-religio-cultural institutions are vulernable to. In this tactic, the DNC is far more like Mao than Xi, which, by my theoretical pondering, is more a reflection of Mao being at the beginning of seeking to recreate a socialist China like the D,C would ultimately create if it were to fully rid the American lands of any signficiant number of people that uphold the values of the Bill of Rights, and recognize their power in protecting the weak from the strong, will be a refection of the usefulnes of the structure to meet the current power need of the DNC when it reaches consolidation.

For now, it is enough for the DNC to focus on closing the deal, on fully cementing its hold on power by ridding the land of the Bill of Rights constructs. So long as it is successful in continuing to reinforce the notion that all of the land views threats to other races by dangerous whites as necessitating the rights espoused in those 10 amendments to our American Constitution, more and more is chipped away at the core of the resistance to the DNC world the DNC seeks to create, a world that might be described by them at some point as Socialism with Chinse Characteristics, though the Socialism part in America, as well as what exists in China, will be in name only, as it wlll simply be a police state that controls as much as it can without cutting off productive output from the highest to the lowest levels, what China essentially is today.

Both China and the DNC still rely on the same method, fundamentally, of control, the use of failure to meet social orthodoxy, a penalty that could be worthy of death itself in some circumstances, certainly one that, more often than not, requires market, social, and cultural removal, to be depersoned for the crime of having bad thoughts that you dared express publicly.

We live in extraordinary times. We are soon to find out if the DNC has consolidated power in America, and if Chairman Xi can keep his Kingdom together while the mandate of heaven appears to frown on him and he prepares to insert Chinese troops and personnel into nations around the world.

, Xi Jinping Thought, for children

From www.economist.com
2021-09-02 14:48:27

Excerpt:

Sep 4th 2021

ASK MEMBERS of China’s elite—from senior officials to academics at leading universities, well-known commentators or bosses at big companies—to explain the beliefs of the country’s leader, Xi Jinping, and their replies are surprisingly unhelpful. Even simple questions elicit waffly answers. Take an ongoing campaign to clip the wings of some of China’s largest firms, notably technology giants. The authorities have variously accused such businesses of seeking excessive profits, harming national security with a cavalier approach to data, abusing workers, bullying smaller firms or exploiting young consumers with addictive video games and online fan clubs. Is Mr Xi revealing himself as an ideologue, bent on re-imposing Communist Party control over the economy at the expense of growth? Or is he more pragmatic than that: a nationalist strongman who is helping to make China stable at home and mighty abroad? There is chatter among the country’s grandees, but no consensus.

Given such confusion among grown-ups, this is a bold moment to issue a new series of textbooks to all students in Chinese schools, colleges and universities, with the aim of explaining Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for the New Era, as Mr Xi’s political philosophy is formally known.

As the academic year began on September 1st, teachers and lecturers began distributing these books, tailored for each age-group, down to children as young as six. The use of stand-alone schoolbooks devoted to a serving leader marks a break with decades of caution. The last time that hundreds of millions of youngsters clutched books devoted to the wisdom of one man was under Mao Zedong, the object (and instigator) of a disastrous personality cult.

Books for the young are especially revealing, for they have to keep their messages simple. Primary schools have long taught the general rudiments of ideology. Via courses with names like “ethics and law”, children have studied…

Read Full Article

Half the Country Still Questions Biden Presidencial Legitimacy

Half the Country Still Questions Biden Presidential Legitimacy

Paul Collier September 8, 2021

Recent polls show the nation is just about split on the question of whether the 2020 Presidential election was legitimate, and thus, is Joe Biden a legitimate question. Let’s paint this new fact in the context of the reality of power we find ourselves in, one in which the DNC machine controls, almost completely, the narrative of daily discourse.

Corpowoketarianz of the DNC machine control the media, the culture, the Federal government, and the means of digital public discourse. All of their efforts have been to use heavily coercive, subhumanizing, threatening tactics to bury the notion that Joe Biden was duly elected in a right and proper manner and no questions should be asked that might even hint at something that could diminish this orthodox assertion of the powers that be.

The reality of the election is not the relevent focus here, rather, the revelation you should take from the fact that, even after all the threats, the brutal market assassination, all the propaganda, the whole system is so untrustworthy and unbelievable itself that it cannot even convince more than half the country that the election itself was legitimate.

Methinks if the DNC machine made this much effort to convince people the earth was not flat, suddenly, the nation would be divided about whetther the world was flat, not because a flat earth is credible, but because ANYTHING this machine tries to force on you and convince you with their horrid propaganda bits, be they news reports or new ‘superhero’ movies becomes immediately discredited by a minimum of half the country, and I suspect they’re going to lose even more, and are already losing more and know it.

Poll shows partisan split on Biden legitimacy, more issues

From rssfeeds.usatoday.com
2021-09-02 16:05:07
USA TODAY
Excerpt:

Nearly one year into his presidency, 70% of Republicans maintain that Joe Biden was not legitimately elected President of the United States, while 22% concede that he was. Those results are according to the most recent exclusive Suffolk University/USA TODAY poll of U.S. registered voters. Meanwhile, 96% of Democrats believe Biden was duly elected. In January, those statistics were nearly identical—nothing has changed.

The table below with results from the poll highlights that Joe Biden’s legitimacy is not the only point of partisan contention. Republican and Democratic registered voters have entirely different views on what the biggest challenges for the country have been over the last 20 years. Democrats’ low historical ranking of the 9/11 attacks was likely underscored by their opinion that domestic terrorism is a much more serious challenge to our security today than foreign terrorism (81-13). Meanwhile, Republicans saw foreign terrorism as being more challenging (53-40).

Read Full Article

News Creators Have Yet Another Reason to Abandon Facebook

Parker Davis September 1, 2021

At some point, we in the news world became largely dependent on traffic from social media sites rather than placement in google search results, especially those of us in the bottom tier of scale as far as newsing is concerned.

Twitter was once a relaible source for traffic to news websites, but, in time, it became more and more difficult for smaller scale operations to get any results worth any time that might be spent to get those results. Facebook, however, continued to be a great driver of news traffic to news websites, such as ours. And even as I write this, Facebook continues to be a major driver of traffic to this site as well, though not nearly as signficantly as it once was.

We at The Freedomist have been working on other methods of traffic generation with an awareness that Facebook should not be looked upon as a secure space to set up shop for any significant period of time. We have in our network multiple Facebook pages, some of which have well over 100k likes, but we view these almost as ghosts still able to produce a few worthwhile results for a little while longer.

WIth the news that facebook will be throttling political content, which is most news these days, since everything is political now, we can expect to have even less traffic from Facebook than we already have, and many other operations such as ours will as well, which might cause some short-term for some (some more than others), but will produce longterm gains in terms of leading more and more people to build social media sharing platforms that are more stable and more free speech rooted in their method of governance, and more fundamentally aligned with the spirit of the Bill of rights and not the CCP or DNC or even GOP for that matter.

Facebook’s continued zeal to be the moral gatekeeper of socety is leading it to conclude its poor uneducated roobs that utlize its platform are hardly smart enough to discern for themselves what they find offensive, what they find misleading, what they find good, what they find bad. For this reason, Facebook will try to hide all those flame-shooting links that might upset the poor delicates who can hardly dress themselves each morning let alone think for themselves.

This means the political links gots ta goes, and Facebook gives the primary drivers of traffic to their platform, news creators, more incentive to develop better non-Facevook ways to get traffic to their websites.

Facebook to downrank political content, hurting news publishers

From www.washingtonexaminer.com
2021-08-31 16:08:42
Nihal Krishan
Excerpt:

Facebook will reduce the amount of political content on its news feed due to negative user feedback, a move that could hurt news publishers and those that post about politics, according to reports Tuesday.

The social media giant will reduce political content by not relying so heavily on its content engagement algorithm, which focuses on the likelihood that a user will share or comment on a post based on past behavior, Axios reported .

It will also start to experiment with limits on how much political content people outside of the United States will see on their news feeds, including countries such as Costa Rica, Sweden, Spain, and Ireland.

Facebook announced in February that it would look into ways to reduce political content on the platform to better meet the needs of users, it said. According to the company, an average of 6% of a user’s feed represents political content.

“There has been this trend, I think, across society…

Read Full Article

DNC House Targets CCP Corps on US Exchanges

Paul Collier September 1, 2021

In the complicated relationship that is the DNC and the CCP, the frenemies that have, until recently, been more friend than enemy, the methods of shifting the balance of power to favor this or that side when it comes to the hardball negotiating can become ultimately sabotaging to the ability of two camps that, at least for now and the near-foreseeable future, kind of both need each other to make the others’ dreams come true.

The US Hoouuse, led by the Democrats, in the case, the direct party that finds itself in that frenemy space with the CCP, is seeking to perhaps either clip some of the wings of their CCP counterparts, or maybe only bluster just to show that, if they wanted, they could clip those wings. They are conducting investigations into the listing of some Chinese companies on their US exchanges, which follows the announcement by China that many American “data-driven” mega-corps might find themselves de-listed on their exchanges, or more, facing draconian regulations that mgiht all-but cut off that fat Chinese markets from the corporations in America that desperately need that Chinese revenue if they are to continue to use their platforms to adviance ideology and not serve diverse pluralistic cultures and beliefs that we Americans represent.

If the corporations must actually produce products the plurality of Americans, across our diverse divides, likes, then they cannot continue to advance their current chosen vehicle of power to hopefully cut off competition from the poors for generations to come. But, to make that transition, to end the Bill of Rights constructs of the land and to replace it with a return to a sort of priest-king model of the Bronze Age, the mega-corps, the corpo-nations, maybe, nations into themselves, with budgets that many actual nation-states would love to have, must have a source for revenue

That’s where China comes in. But China herself still needs America, the America the DNC offers, and still needs the DNC to finish off the Bill of Rights constructs of the land, to end the more fundamental threat to their plans, not the people in this land, but the ideas in the Bill of Rights that many poors, including their own, would quickly recognize as giving them protection against the tyranny of the majority, be it the numerical or by measures of power.

My bet is China will have to walk back some of their restrictions newly placed on America to gain access to her fatty markets and the DNC will produce a little pony show to send a message to the Chinese that they have teeth as well, and also to keep people off their trail when it comes to their alliance with the CCP itself. How can you say they are allied with the CCP when they are investigating their companies that are listed on our exchanges?

Of course, at least in this article, I think I’ve already explained how I can say that. This type of working for and against other parties is not even new, nor unique to our current age, when we can just look at the relationship betwen Russia and Turkey to see how it is that two “allies” can also be enemies in other spheres. There are times when some Turkish military assets are being assisted by Russian military assets while in another part of the world Russian drones and Turkish drones are battling each other over another poor nation that finds itself being used as a war games proving ground for the world powers’ new toys, especially those drones.

And so it is with the DNC and the CCP, frenemies, and the DNC is sending a message to its frenemy, we can do this to your companies as well, so back off.

U.S. House panel targets Chinese listings on U.S. exchanges

From finance.yahoo.com
2021-08-31 15:22:40

Excerpt:

WASHINGTON, Aug 31 (Reuters) – A U.S. House of Representatives panel focused on protecting investors will hold a hearing on Sept. 22 about risks related to Chinese stock market listings on American exchanges.

The Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship and Capital Markets hearing will take place among growing concerns about recent Chinese government actions that spurred sudden and unexpected swings in share prices of Chinese shares listed on U.S. exchanges.

Earlier this week, for example, China forbade under-18s from playing video games https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-rolls-out-new-rules-minors-online-gaming-xinhua-2021-08-30 for more than three hours a week, hitting shares of some Chinese gaming companies traded in the United States.

U.S. lawmakers have also complained about Chinese corporate accounting practices and alleged ties between some Chinese companies and the military. (Reporting by Chris Sanders; editing by Jonathan Oatis)

Read Full Article

The Power of Big Social to Control Your Religious Beliefs

Paul Collier August 31, 2021

Christian groups around the world are beginning to wonder if the international monopolies on social media might just be used as filters to prevent their worldviews from gaining access to the public stage, which is, de facto, social media overwhelmingly.

They’re not the only groups complaining or worrying about this type of control being placed in the hands of a few billionaires. Other groups are also finding it difficult to get through the filters imposed from on high, and this experience only promises to repeat itself for an increasing range of groups that hold beliefs outside the accepted orthodoxy of the state and the corporation (and where the one begins and the other hands, who knows, the lines at this time are very blurred, if they exist at all).

The question is, what can be done about this? Should we use the state to resuce us from corporate tyranny, and thus empower the state to control the de facto public square, social media? That’s already happpening in many countries, with others also choosing to attempt to build their own nationalist social media platforms safe from the prying filters and promotions of the corpostates within them that are increasingly being thought of as being de facto states that maybe, at some point, should be dealt with as such.

Big Tech might very well find itself hoisted on its own success, and its willingness to spend that success so recklessly to serve the agenda of a petty party, the DNC, because orange man bad or conservatives are evil or whatever other cartoon villain narrative you’d like to choose. But it pushed too far, and now, people are starting to realize how much power it is, and some of those people have real power, government gun power, and they will soon be using it, even as some already have.

‘Big Tech’ censorship of religion is real and deserves an effective response, critics say

From angelusnews.com
2021-08-31 16:40:37

Excerpt:

The power of major internet companies like Facebook, Amazon, YouTube, and Twitter over public life is a particular threat to religious groups that focus on controversial issues like abortion, marriage, and sexuality, several commentators said at a roundtable last week. These groups should prepare for the possibility of censorship and organize effective countermeasures, they said.

“You might not know the hour nor the day you will be censored,” Joshua D. Holdenreid, vice president and executive director of the California-based Napa Legal Institute, said at a roundtable on internet censorship.

Holdenreid said those involved in public debates “need to plan ahead and assume that if they are a religious organization or faith-based organization operating in the public square and focused on an issue that’s related to pro-life (topics), marriage, sexuality, Christian anthropology, they should just assume that they will eventually run afoul of these vague and arbitrary terms and…

Read Full Article

Civil War? Probably…no

Bill Collier August 20, 2021

Around 60% of Americans think civil war is somewhat likely or very likely. This is a lot and to some, including Tim Pool, pictured above, it is scary.

But are we headed for some sort of civil war or upheaval in this country?

In his landmark book “Anamtomy of Revolution”, Crane Brinton laid out signs of impending revolution and one of the major signs: people, including the intelligentsia, openly say they think it is inevitable. While such numbers are concerning, they are not necessarily a guarantee of results. In other words, the potential for upheaval may be there, but it’s not a certainty.

Revolution or civil war in this country lack many elements, chief among them being that no coherent opposition and no singular leadership cadre had emerged to facilitate the pent-up rage and turn it into action. The opposition is disorganized, rent-seeking, celebrity worshipping, and feckless. The opposition has no cogent narrative to counter the establishment. There is no real sign the opposition can even operate and compete outside the technological and economic ecosystem controlled by that establishment. There is not underground, no alternative culture, not opt-out resources.

The kind of upheaval we face is a civilizational collapse, which could take decades to sort itself out. In the grand scheme of civilizational decline, all the signs of revolution or civil war are present, but the fire in the belly needed to rise up just isn’t there. This is how civilizations die, slowly and painfully.

What we should be looking for isn’t a revolution or a civil war, what we should be looking for is the emergence of an internal proletariat, people who opt out and drop out, a withdrawal and inward focus with people who reject the zeitgeist of the hour and step out of the flow of the current system. This withdrawal of an internal proletariat who simply find gaps for freedom wherein they can build a culture that is diametrically opposed to the prevalent culture is the burgeoning phase of a new civilization.

There are too few people, less than 1%, initially who are willing to join the ranks of an alt-culture and opt out of the socioeconomic and sociocultural zeitgeist in totality. Likewise, there are too few people who would be willing to risk all for some revolution or civil war, even if they are alarmed at how things are going.

Basically, there isn’t going to be any kind of civil war or revolution in this country any time soon. Authoritarianism will likely grow and the only path of escape is to find and join an inner proletariat who have the courage, the heart, and the discipline to opt out as much as they can, albeit peacefully.

Will The US Re-Engage In Afghanistan?

Bill Collier August 13, 2021

US forces are being airlifted back into Afghanistan in a desperate bid to save US citizens and Afghani collaborators from the Taliban advance.

As the Taliban marches into the remaining “free” areas of Afghanistan, a feat nobody who was watching matters is surprised about, the temptation to “save” Afghanistan from itself may be great. The amount of money made by the defense industry is staggering, but the gain of this policy is negligible. In the end, despite massive aid and training, the people of Afghanistan don’t want freedom, they want a throwback to the most archaic and barbaric religious ideology known to modern humanity.

The US is now sending in troops to rescue US citizens and Afghani collaborators with the US in scenes that will potentially be more dramatic than the fall of Saigon. The Taliban, backed by China and Pakistan and freshly armed with captured US war booty, are about to turn the country back into a terrorist safe haven and 7th century hellscape in which Christians are martyred and women become chattel.

The blame lies with every US President since Bush II, the neocon “genius” who promised that everyone wants “democracy” if only US forces fought for their freedom, even though the actual people being “liberated” never have. But the consequences are to the American people, both in terms of lost lives, changed lives through injury and psychological damage, and trillions of dollars, most of which lined corporate pockets.

The drumbeat of war will begin as soon as, once again, Afghanistan hosts the next terrorist act against the US. Outraged people will want revenge and will forget that this story keeps repeating with no successful end in sight. The propensity of the ruling class to foment conflicts which they profit from has never been greater.

But from the perspective of the average Afghani, most of whom lack the courage and conviction needed to resist the ideology of the Taliban, life will become a horror freak show. The ruthlessness and arbitrary brutality of the Taliban falls on people even if they desperately try to comply with the overwhelming edicts of this throwback religious sect. Nobody, not even a faithful Taliban member, is safe from the possibility of being brutalized and murdered for reasons they cannot even fathom.

Every Afghani who aided the Americans, and there are hundreds of thousands, is going to face dire consequences, and so is their family. The precipitous withdrawal of the US from Afghanistan, brokered by Trump and then carried out months later than planned by Biden, means that almost none of these people will be safe. Simply importing all of them to the US is not a practical solution. Moreover, they didn’t collaborate with the US to have to leave their homeland, many just wanted to make money or, in some cases, they wanted to move their country into the 21st century.

Sending in US troops to Kabul to effect an emergency evacuation while the President practically begs and then cajoles the Taliban, who have no fear of the US, may morph into saving the army of collaborators who have, mostly, turned tail and fled from the enemy. Plaintiff cries to save the Afghani collaborators have already begun and this pressure is coming from the right and left.

But the pressure to just put this behind us, cut our losses, including human losses, and move on is greater. Any “engagement” is likely to be covert and concealed, possibly carried out by mercenaries (contractors), and possibly by buying off more Afghanis to trade money for propping up a corrupt puppet regime. There is no popular support or willingness to sacrifice or fight to save Afghanistan from the China and Pakistan backed Taliban.

Afghanistan and Iraq have been a gross debacle, they have caused massive losses to the US and they have only made things worse in those lands. This is a bipartisan debacle no US President since Bush II has had the moral courage and tenacity to stop. Biden is the last unfortunate President who must oversee the final collapse which was inevitable way back in 2001 when the plan became “nation building” for a population that wouldn’t fight for its own freedom.

US re-engagement in Afghanistan would only serve the defense industry and, while it is unlikely, one can never underestimate the corruption and foolishness of America’s real political shot-callers.

Without Nukes, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan May Be Doomed

Bill Collier August 9, 2021

Taiwan’s existence is imperiled without a nuclear deterrent it can directly control, but so too are Japan and South Korea vulnerable, because the US cannot be counted on as an ally over the long-haul.

Bill Collier, Predictive Analysis- Depending on the United States has left many a country floundering on the rocks as, when push came to shove, the US, thanks to its inherently flawed version of modern “democracy” with its wild and unstable swings fueled by shallow propaganda aimed at gullible voters, turns its back on old friends. The precipitous, chaotic US withdrawals from Afghanistan and Iraq, for instance, left almost all the locals who had collaborated with the Americans exposed and in danger, for instance.

The US withdrawal from Vietnam was capped by the now infamous photo of a US helicopter flying out a few escapees as the Viet Cong closed in. Not only did the US leave Vietnam chaotically, the US stopped supporting South Vietnam and allowed the Communist invasion to overtake their former allies, this after over 50,000 US service members perished in fighting FOR South Vietnam’s independence from the Communist Bloc.

As for Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, their status as Front-Line States against China and its aggresive communist imperialist leaves them vulnerable as soon as the US decides to sacrifice them or loses interest in their defense. Relying on the US nuclear shield or military presence, these three states would be extremely vulnerable on their own.

In the event China siezes Taiwan, which would likely be a lightening and overwhelming operation that would see the Chinese descend on their tiny neighbor en masse, both South Korea and Japan would be outflanked. If the US gives ground over Taiwan, a possibility given the collaborationist Democrats whose ideological sympathy is with Beijing, neither Japan nor South Korea would have an answer to Chinese aggression.

The only guarantee these states would have is to cooperate fully with one one another in a close alliance aimed at producing a nuclear deterrent. No matter what these states do, sans the US military presence they cannot muster enough conventional forces to stop a determined Chinese attack. Moreover, the balance of power will continue to turn against them. But with a nuclear deterrent and a willingness to use it, China would have to choice but to come to terms with their neighbors.

The knee-jerk opposition to the “proliferation of nuclear weapons”, mostly by states that have nuclear weapons, seems to equate “peace” with this effort. But nuclear weapons have not led to war and will not lead to war as mutual assured destruction keeps warlike intentions in check. The North Korean regime would already be gone but for the Chinese nuclear umbrella in the past while, today, even the Chinese are hesitant to replace the Kim family regime because North Korea has nuclear weapons.

It is possible, albeit not highly probable, that these three states have already secretly begun talks, if not technical efforts, to develop nuclear weapons. The problem is that the present South Korean leader, Moon Jae-in, and his Democrats, have largely favored a rapprochement with China over North Korea and, while this has not played a significant role in the upcoming election in March 2022, it may be reversed soon as the more conservative People’s Power Party is poised to win.

With South Korea roiled by scandals and led by a collaborationist Party, whose leftwing views comport with the “Chinese model”, the likelihood of South Korea joining a secret effort of this nature is slim. Indeed, the wonder of it all may also be the failure of Australia and New Zealand, the next targets if Taiwan falls and both Japan and South Korea are forced to concede ground, to develop their own nuclear weapons programs.

The cooperation of Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea to obtain nuclear weapons would be a logical response to Chinese aggression, but if such a program were ever leaked prior to actualization, it would no doubt trigger a violent Chinese response which the US may feel they cannot morally counter. After all, China could claim such a program represents an existential threat to its regime and, in truth, if these three powers did go nuclear it could actually thoroughly and finally bottle China up in a manner that ensures its eventual economic collapse.

No power more than India has any more reason to support the nuclear arming of these three states. Indeed, in an extemely unlikely but not impossible scenario, India could decide to actually station nuclear weapons in Taiwan, unveiling them on the heels of some formal declaration by Taiwan of a sort of Independence. It is doubtful Tawain, which sees the eventual reunification of China under its form of government as its long-term goal, would concede its claims by declaring “independence”, but it could, with a nuclear umbrella, assert independence and regain formal recognition by some countries as the legitimate successor state to the Qing Dynasty, which it displaced in 1911-12.

It should be noted that the Chinese communist party has never won any free and fair election and only 1 in 16 Chinese actually belong to the Party, which won by force, backed by the Soviets, as Americans betrayed the Republic of China (RoC). The Communists took over by force in 1949 and have ruled by force since then. Never have the Chinese Communists won the popular vote in anything approaching any kind of free and fair elections.

The way the US betrayed the RoC, the way the US left South Vuetnam and abandoned its friends in Afghanistan and Iraq, leaving them to their fate, should serve as a warning to these front-line states that dependency on the Americans is a foolhardy plan.

The possibility is there that one or more of these states already has a very secret nuclear weapons program underway, but unless they do, and soon, the probability is that all three will eventually be made to bow before the spector of Chinese communist imperialism.

In the end, either these states will obtain a nuclear deterrent on their own or, eventually, they will be forced to come under the sway of China in some capacity and effectively lose their sovereignty.

Fortify Yourself and Your Kin For A Dark Winter

Bill Collier August 7, 2021

Bill Collier- The possibilities of a dark winter, driven by the totalitarian ambitions of the Party in power and by the new varieties of “the virus”, are becoming ever more probable. Stocking up on essentials and husbanding your resources and money for dark times is part of the necessity, but so also is building mutual support, even if informally, among your local family and friends.

It is time to fortify yourself so that, like a mighty fortress in a dark winter fastness, you and your family can thrive and endure the coldest and most forbidding environment.

We can anticipate stock market swings, supply shortages, increased pressures to conform to the new cancel culture of alt-gendered depravity, more lockdowns and restrictions, and deplatforming of dissent, all under the twin guises of public health and allegations that all dissent equals insurrection.

Who can you trust to help you and have your back? Where can you live if you lose job and income? Do you have 6 months worth of necessities? What happens if you can’t get new prescriptions filled? How will you power your home or cook food and stay warm if utilities fail? What will you do for water if the water supply fails? How will you protect yourself or where will you flee to if violent rioters invade your neighborhood? Will local officials and local police back your rights against state or federal edicts or will they support the assault on your rights?

If you are not asking and finding answers to these questions, then this winter could be rather dark and foreboding to you and the pressure to abandon any semblance of your Christian or Jewish, or Muslim, faith in favor of the alt-gendered hedonistic culture and its authoritarianism may be too great to bear.

Three things should be noted: this may not materialize, it may materialize only here and there and not everywhere (albeit randomly), and, come what may, it isn’t likely to endure for more than another 3-9 months from when it begins. The force and means required to maintain such a regimen of top-down control and contravention of basic human rights are beyond the means of the present ruling class. They can’t print enough money or buy enough gangster goons to keep the pressure up forever: their hope is that through top-down imposition people will adopt their “new” barbaric ways and no longer need to be coerced so strongly.

The more prepared people are, the more connected to other people, the more likely this scenario will either fail to materialize or the shorter it will last once it begins.

A dark winter is very possible and the necessity to prepare and to intentionally connect to other people has never been greater in modern history.

Anger At Sociopaths In Power Fuels Growing Militancy, But Is Our Union In Peril?

Bill Collier August 3, 2021

Will the anger over the authoritarian responses from sociopaths in power threaten to destroy our country and turn us into Bosnia 2.0?

The fact YouGov did a survey of over 1700 voters and found 47% of Republicans believe force may be needed to prevent the left from destroying the American way of life is no doubt being used by the authoritarian left to further promote the narrative their political opponents are rebels and insurrectionists who should be outlawed. But this over-reactionn only “proves” that those who would foment upheaval are “justified” and “right” in their claims.

We have to ask, will this backlash against the authoritarian left and their woke corporate neocommunist totalitarianism, and the left’s over reaction, destroy our country as we plunge into violence against each other? And, if so, who and what it to blame?

We have been predicting that the deliberate and irrational efforts by authoritarians, mostly on the left, to delegitimize and demonize their opponents, painting them as racists or nazis and other epithets, would eventually push some over the edge, leading to militancy and instability. The targets of the freedom takers clearly feel that their options for peaceful redress are narrowing.

Donald Trump, conspiracy theories, misinformation, fake news, and all that are, regardless of other claims, merely symptoms of something which has as its cause the sociopathic behavior of the authoritarian left. Their conduct wherever they have power, in places like the schools and universities and the state of California, is grossly anti-American and totalitarian, frankly, to an extreme that is beginning to look like the corporatized modern version of a neosoviet dictatorship. The woke cancel culture with its opaque rules that are unevenly applied and always only to help Democrats win power by legerdemain and chicanery is a mass sociopathic hypnosis of useful idiots who becomes the drone warriors of an insidious revolution against freedom and basic humanity.

Even if and when we raise questions about some rather outlandish claims on the right, we are aware that the spread of such claims is just a sign of a deeper problem that isn’t the fault of the claims makers. That problem is the sociopathy of the left, whose leaders and whose radical base are every day assaulting faith, family, and freedom, in that order, and whose only alternative offering is a future neosoviet inperium made up of an alt-gendered, undifferentiated mass controlled from the top through monopoly corporations and power mad bureaucrats.

Democrats live in a bubble and while all sides tend to do this, it is far worse for Democrats who rarely if ever even countenance any perspective other than their own. Nobody in power challenges them. And so they act like their opponents have no say, no legitimate right to respond, and also as if their actions cannot ever get a response of any mean from their opponents.

Quite simply, Democrats today imagine they can pass laws, corporate policies, community standards on monopoly platforms, or regulations and enact curriculum standards that all happen in a void and cannot be responded to by anyone who disagrees. Disagreement is treason to these people. Anyone who isn’t totally down with their revolution is an outlaw. They are, at present, as great a threat to humanity itself as any other major threat in our history as a species. Their outlandish totalitarian ideas and their destruction of faith, family, and freedom, in that order, would potentially lead to the collapse of human civilization itself.

There isn’t a “problem” Democrats don’t want to “solve” through dictatorial control over others and the transfer of wealth from the wealth producing workers to people who don’t earn it, starting with the billionaires who own the Democratic Party. This constant, knee-jerk totalitarian response to real, over-inflated, and imagined problems has begun to wear thin on people whose true north is to be found in a love for faith, family, and freedom as defined in the Judeo-Christian heritage of our country, a heritage being maligned and demonized by public schools which are run by totalitarian loons.

If, however, things spiral out of control, one can imagine armies, from multiple “sides”, tearing out the heart and soul of this land until our cities lie in ruins. This possibly has not been closer since the 1850s but it was foreseen by us way back in the 1980s as the sociocultural and political situation in this country had devolved.

Even if we disagree with and disavow such talk of or affection for the use of force to rectify these injustices by the authoritarian left, we are not surprised that their violations of human rights and human dignity and their war against human flourishing are fertile ground for such a backlash of anger. But backlashes of anger rarely produce solutions that are beneficial to most everyone most of the time, they can actually lear to a different kind of authoritarianism from the other side.

Indeed, the entire genesis of leftwing authoritarianism may be found in the previous century’s more rightwing versions of authoritarianism in which some of the actual social injustices, like racism and discrimination, became fertile ground for an equally authoritarian backlash from the left.

The Judeo-Christian heritage of this country is, we propose, sound and worthy of being upheld and advanced as a voluntary basis of our shared identity as a nation, to wit being an “American” by “ethnicity” is all about these values and convictions. This doesn’t mean other American citizens who don’t embrace this aren’t “Americans” of equal value, but the idea is that if “American” by ethnicity is defined on this basis, less than half of all US citizens are “sociocultural Americans” by spiritual disposition.

But the history of these United States is riddled with practices, policies, and events that positively betrayed our Judeo-Christian heritage, namely by not resognizing and respecting the inherent dignity and rights of every human being and by not focusing intentionally on the universal flourishing of our entire population and every single community and family in this land.

The consequences of our hypocrisy are that the authoritarian left has a cause and excuse not merely to demand fidelity to our historic moral orthodoxy as a free country of sovereign and independence persons but to accuse the very ideas we have collectively violated as being the root cause of actual social injustice. Where we may say certain places and population groups have experienced injustice because we failed to live out our Judeo-Christian worldview, the authoritarian left say that our Judeo-Christian heritage IS the problem and must be rejected and then replaced with their alt-gendered, atomized and yet collectivized civilization governed through powerful monopoly corporations and the government.

So our hypocrisy and inconsistencies spurred the social justice cancel culture revolution which is itself, through an even worse series of mass injustices against humanity itself, spurring a feeling of anger and reaction, hence 47% of Republicans feeling “patriots” may need to use force to stop this cancel culture war on their values, way of life, and freedom.

We propose that a voluntary return, starting with individuals, to our Judeo-Christian heritage, albeit with modern adaptations and a more inclusive application that serves all American citizens equally, is the better path than any resort to violence. The backlash against the sociopathic behavior of our top politicos and corporate owners, and their rabid authoritarianism, came as a result of our own collective failure to live up to our true manifest destiny as a commonwealth of freedom with liberty and justice for all based on shared Judeo-Christian beliefs, values, and convictions.

People seeing civil war as somehow preferable to the trend toward authoritarianism by the woke corpo-communists of the Democratic Party may not realize that without a full-hearted return to first principles on their part no real lasting change is possible.

But will the fact that such a plurality of people on both sides who believe force may be necessary against the other side lead to violent upheaval? While we would say that this isn’t an immediate risk, it is becoming a growing risk both to the stability of the US and the global systems of trade and collective security that depends upon a strong US military with global power projection.

The “doomsday clock” that might countdown how close we are to a fatal breach of our Union might not by quite at 11pm, but it is well past 10pm and the clock appears to be ticking onward without any sobering sense of what is at stake. The angry victims of the totalitarianism of the left are not resorting to their own core values in a meaningful way beyond voting and the angry left who keep fighting old wars are not sobering up to just how badly they are miscalculating the response their actions will engender.

If either side or both sides sober up, these threats to our Union could disintegrate rapidly, but as we see hardening of positions and the growing militancy of one side spurring an increase in militancy in the other side we recognize that the growing potential for real upheaval.

This is neither necessary nor inevitable and, for now, not a likely possibility. If indeed a serious rupture were to occur, it would be a tragic comedy of errors on the part of one or both sides, therefore we rate this as an emerging threat but not a serious possibility.

Fuel the movement toward the restoration of full freedom for all Americans! JOIN US NOW!