The US deadline on reporting on the origins of the Covid-19 virus breakout that turned into a worldwide pandemic is almost here, and insiders are reporting that the Biden adminsitration is about to declare that the virus did, in fact, come from China, and, specifically, a leak in the Wuhan Lab.
If the Biden administration does follow through with this, or, more accurately, if the leaked reports are true, then this telegraphs the DNC’s attempts to limit the power that China currently has over them, as their de facto ally and inspirtation, but ultimately competitor for hegemony over the world. The DNC-CCP relationship is complicated, and while they still yet need one another, they also ultimately will have to compete with one another for control of the neo-fascistic-socialist model that China perfected and the DNC wants to emulate here in America.
The Biden administration will only follow through with this if they perceive they no longer need the CCP as much as they once did, specifically the Chinese market to fund their anti-American activities on our shores. If they release an equivocating report, it telegraphs that their need for that anti-american funding from a Chinese market is still very much needed.
Time is running out on speculation and soon we will see just where the DNC stands in its assessment of its power compared to that of the CCP, its frenemy.
President Biden’s 90-day deadline for an intelligence report into the origins of COVID-19 is fast approaching. But the American desire for a U.S.-led investigation is not shared by China – a country that continues to push the world, including CBS News’ Ramy Inocencio, to look outside of Wuhan for answers.
We have said it before and we’lll say it again, the top two threats to state power are anonymity in value exchange and self-sufficiency among its citizens. Anonymous cryptocurrencies offer opportunites for both such threats to state power, but the second part of that potential to undermine state power is based on the first part, anonymous value exchange.
The EU is fully aware of this and, using scapegoating to justify tyranny once again, is using the narrative that the state must know every value transaction in its lands else mobsters and terrorists can exchange wealth without being found out by the state. Certainly this is true, ‘criminals’ will benefit from anonymous exchange of value but, perhaps, the self-sufficiency among the vast majority of non-criminals will lead to a neutralization of the potential ways in which these same criminals can attack the non-criminals.
The creation of absolute state monitoring of value exchange, however, only creates more opportunities for the same ‘criminals’ to hurt non-criminals by making people dependent on centralized systems that are far easier to disrupt than non-centralized systems are.
The EU is now prepared to make sure that all cryptocurrency exchanges are traceable, starting with the still biggest one, Bitcoin.
Cryptocurrency exchanges like Binance, Coinbase and Kraken could be forced to collect the details of people sending and receiving crypto under new rules proposed by the European Commission.
The EU’s executive branch announced the potential change on Tuesday as part of a package of reforms aimed at tackling financial crime within the bloc.
“The aim of this package is to improve the detection of suspicious transactions and activities, and to close loopholes used by criminals to launder illicit proceeds or finance terrorist activities through the financial system,” the Commission said in a statement.
The American media, aka DNC Pravda, are trying to convince you that the Taliban are reformed, that you should give them a chance to prove they’ve grown up, and anyone who doesn’t see this racist and/or bigoted. Yet, while they pontificate on the benevolence of the Taliban, with one Canadian official referring to the Taliban as their brothers, the killings of people who don’t believe the Taliban way have already begun, and our American media, DNC Pravda, is silent.
The Taliban has vowed to play a global role in tackling climate change and world security, despite their shocking track record of orchestrating civilian executions and eroding the rights of women and minorities.
Abdul Qahar Balkhi, a member of the Taliban’s Cultural Commission, told Newsweek: “We believe the world has a unique opportunity of rapprochement and coming together to tackle the challenges not only facing us but the entire humanity.
“These challenges ranging from world security and climate change need the collective efforts of all, and cannot be achieved if we exclude or ignore an entire people who have been devastated by imposed wars for the past four decades.”
This bizarre attempt to rebrand comes a day after UN human rights chief, Michelle Bachelet, cited multiple credible reports of serious human rights violations committed by the Taliban in Afghanistan including “summary executions” of civilians and Afghan security forces who had surrendered.
An allegedly American publication that claims to be literally for the national interest, called National Interest, has published an opinion piece by anti-Americanist Eleanor Lopatto, who, mercifully for National Interest, appears to have only written just this one article for the publication. What she writes is nothing but CCP-styled anti-american agit prop aimed at vilifying more than half of Americans, subhumanizing people who are skeptical about the efficacy and safety of vaccines, and feeding the enemies of the Ameircan people outside our soils the grist they need to propagandize this anti-American hate on our own social media platforms, and to even sue us out of existence for the damage this insane woman would have you believe they committed.
The ‘writer’ (content marketer for the CCP’s little bro, the DNC) has claimed that the resistance to the vaccine worldwide, especially in the Balkans,can be laid squarely at the feet of America, the evil Empire that allows disinformation on its platforms. This is the safety first, liberty non-existence type person we’ve all seen far too often get the limelight in a world where freedom is defined as being obedient and subservient to the experts, be they scientists, teachers, or government officials. This is Chinese Communist thinking, not American Bill of Rights thinking, and this woman just outed herself as a hater of the very nation-state that made her protected, privileged little life possible in the first place.
You will see more stories like this, as first their low-ranked sycophants test the tolerance of anti-American narratives on the general public. If there is no great outrage, MSNBC and CNN will be speaking the same language as this anti-Americanist, the seditionist-at-heart, Eleanor Lopatto, a woman who makes a very dangerous neighbor to anyone she lives next to, for she is the type that would turn in Anne frank for violating the law, being Jewish while being alive.
Not only is this woman creating narratives our enemies can use against us (including using our own courts to sue the allaged offenders), but she’s also pushing the narrative that Chairman Xi would dearly love to be pushed, that freedom is dangerous, and free speech and free press are too much for the weakminded many masses to have access to, or participate in. And she does so on a publication that LITERALLY calls itself “National Interest” while publishing what could EASILY have been CCP agit prop.
As a matter of fact, the particular style is remarkably similar to that of CCP agit prop aimed at destroying America and American morale, so much so that one would not be suprirsed to learn she was writing from her Uncle’s CCP basement in China, using an American psuedonym to hide her CCP agent identiy. I mean, I don’t really think that’s the case, but, it certainly is possible.
There’s a saying that when the United States sneezes, the world catches a cold. Now some of the world’s most robust immune systems are struggling with a bad case of QAnon.
The three Baltic countries—Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania—are some of the best-prepared on Earth to defend against the evolving threat of modern information campaigns. Their governments, businesses and civil societies honed their skills against Russian information and cyber warfare for nearly a decade before the United States uncovered evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign.
The coronavirus panedemic was a major stress test for the Baltics, forcing intelligence and strategic communications analysts to reconfigure their Russia-centric threat models in order to face a tsunami of misleading information coming not just across their Eastern border, but from every corner of the Earth. The Latvian Strategic Coordination Department coordinated crisis communications while also…
Onlyfans came rouring onto the scene the last couple of years with Bella Thorne igniting the fire when she made over $1 million in less than 24 hours on the app by offering nudes of herself to paying fans, called paypiggies in the industry vernacular.
Not to be outdone, the Cash Me Ouside Girl also made a million dollars offering nudes to paypiggies. Before that, and after that on a much larger scale, if you are a woman and reasonably attractive (or imagine that you are), dreams of OnlyFans gold was sure to enter your mind. At least it seemed that way.
The app set off a whole new cottage industry that threatened conventional sources of sex stuff like pornhub and others. It created an outlet for people (mostly women, though not exclusively) to exploit themselves rather than being exploited by others. Now, a woman could offer her nude services to a discrete clientel online and get ALL of the profit (well, sans the bit the app itself claimed) instead of only a small payment that allowed the producers to make far more money from her nude and sex services than ever she could.
The banks have declared that having a small monpopoly on the financial markets is hardly a danger to people at all, as of course they will use their considerably state-protected monopolistic advantage fairly and equally to all who simply obey the law. That, my friends, was a lie, and one that OnlyFans is exposing, though it’s not the first such proof that banks have decided to use their considerable state-protected financial industry monopoly to punish people who behave immorally according to their particular unaccountable standards of morality.
So the banks have decided that women, and even men, yes, men too, having the capacity to sexually exploit themselves and getting almost all the profit from that exploitation is just outside of their allowable moral standards. So they shook down OnlyFans and gave them an offer they couldn’t refuse. If they didn’t evnd the nude sex stuff, their ability to exist as a company would be over, as the cabal of banking would freeze them out of being able to process payments.
This is not at all a moral defense of sexually exploiting yourself for money, but it is a defense of a pluralistic society having the capacity to act on their preferences without being coercively manipulated by monopolistic corporations. First they came for the self-sex-exploiters, then they came for me, if you get my drift (though they came for a WHOLE LOT of people before they ever got around to shutting down the self-sex-exploiters).
After OnlyFans received the offer they could not refuse, they announced that the nude sex stuff’s gots ta go. As could be predicted, what followed next was nothing but outrage and scorn at OnlyFans, a company that now totters on the edge of existence itself, having ridden the great wave of viral for the past year. The CEO of OnlyFans quickly came out and spilled the beans on the offer that could not be written, the offer that came from the cabal of banks that decided this was just not morally acceptable, and their capacity to destroy us economically is all the justification they need to use that state-protected monpolistic advantage to force their morality on the rest of us.
Is it legal for the banks to do this in the alleged land of the Bill of Rights? Possibly so. This is why some have suggested creating a market bill of rights to reign in the out-of-control power of the monopolies that have almost all demonstrated a willingness to use their state-protected monppolistic advantage to deny basic rights that not even the government can deny. Whether the govenrment approves of it or not, this is de facto facsism, where the state uses market power to violate our rights legally because it’s not, at present, illegal for companies to do so.
If we are to be a people ever again, we must have an identity that does not destroy the multiplicities of identities our diverse lands possess. That identity is the Bill of Rights. And if we are to fulfill the promise that such standards offer, it is time to extend these rights to the marketplace as well as the government square, else fascism will continue to reign in this land and the Bill of Rights will continue to die until we all look around and realize this diversity has no unity anymore, and then, well, nations such as that implode or are taken over by stronger nations.
The OnlyFans censorship by our banking institutions should be the final wakeup call for us all, the proverbial canary in the coal mine that just let you know there’s poison in the air, something must be done.
Banks are to blame for OnlyFans’ ban on sexually explicit content, according to the online subscription service’s founder.
The platform, which is popular among sex workers, recently announced new rules coming into effect in October that prohibit “any content containing sexually explicit conduct”, though non-sexual nudity will still be permitted.
Initially the London-based company said the move was being introduced due to pressure from financial partners, leading some to assume payment processors Mastercard and Visa were behind it.
However, chief executive Tim Stokely has revealed it was “unfair” banks who prompted the change over concerns about “reputational risk”.
He named three banks – the UK’s Metro Bank, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of New York Mellon.
“The change in policy, we had no choice — the short answer is banks,” he told the Financial Times.
“We pay over one million creators over 300 million dollars every month, and making sure that these…
Again thanks to the illegal decision by Federal judges to allow the Sandy Hook lawsuit to go forward targeting gun manufacturers for crimes that use their made guns, an anti-American DA from San Fransicso is attempting to use lawsuits to destroy what laws could not, our right to bear arms. The DA in question is suing ghost gun manufacturers, that is, manufacturers that create kits that enable people to make their own ghost guns (guns that are not registered by American big brother).
This is a form of lawfare that the DNC has been using to destroy liberty in our land, destroy political opposition without openly violating our rights (though, in fact, they do, and it’s simply a failure by the courts to see how allowing these lawfare acts to continue DOES assault our freedoms, or maybe it’s more a willing ignorance on their part as they all seem to go to the same parties together, the judges and the politicians and the ceos of corpowoketarianizm).
Chesa Boudin, the anti-American rogue judge in the rogue citiy of San Fransisco is attempting to drive up the cost of gun production to destroy our ability to bear arms. Its a classic fascist move, to use commercial liability as an idirect assault on liberties that the state itself would not get away with violating. If this man were the DA in an American city, he would be removed immediately for violating his oath of office, to defend the Constitution of the United States, not the CCP agenda.
SAN FRANCISCO – San Francisco’s district attorney said Wednesday he is suing three California companies that make and distribute “ghost guns,” the untraceable, build-it-yourself weaponry that accounted for nearly half the firearms recovered in gun killings in the city last year.
District Attorney Chesa Boudin announced the lawsuit at a news conference, alongside advocates of tougher gun laws.
The suit names Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, GS Performance and MDX Corp., three companies that are not based in San Francisco but are responsible for producing a large share of the firearms found in the city and elsewhere in the state, Boudin said.
“Guns are flooding our streets. Enough is enough,” Boudin said. “It is not enough to wait until after someone has been shot and killed by a firearm. We must get to the root of the problem.”
Boudin’s lawsuit comes amid mounting criticism over his response to rising crime rates and a wave of anti-Asian violence in the city, which has…
As corpowoketarianizm continues to extend its reach and its assumptions about what it can or cannot do to employees, customers, citizens in a Bill of Rights limited Democratic Republic, such as America is, the test of their attempt to subvert American standards for more Chinese Communist Party type standards will be challenged in the courts. If the courts fail us, we are left with the realization that the enemy has won and we have no nation to fight for.
Part of this process can be seen in the case of Professo Dan Ravicher, a former teacher at the University of Miami Law School who was let go allegedly to make room for a non-white professor. The complaint charges the school with firing him for being white. Let’s see if we have any remnant of America left in our courts or not.
From feedproxy.google.com
2021-08-24 04:09:03
Ashley Carnahan – University of Southern California Excerpt:
Former University of Miami Law Scool Professor Dan Ravicher has filed an Equal Opportunity Employment Commission complaint against his former employer after it forced him out of his professor job.
The federal complaint alleged a breach of contract, defamation and discrimination against him based on race and gender. It comes after Ravicher and his attorney brought up the same concerns in a June letter to the private Florida university to no avail.
The EEOC filing alleged Miami Law treated the conservative professor differently because he is a white male who supported President Donald Trump. Ravicher has not heard from the EEOC as of August 23, according to a Twitter message to The College Fix. He filed the complaint on July 28.
Former Dean Anthony Varona violated Title VII and the Florida Civil Rights Act, Ravicher alleged. Ravicher paraphrased Varona’s assertion that…
The Afghanis who are trapped behind enemy lines, which is their whole country now (save for one valley), have been told by the Taliban that they are no longer permitted to leave. The Biden administration seems fine with this declaration, and, so far, seems more interested in ‘honoring’ the Taliban than rescuing our allies and even our citizens, commiting to the Taliban created August 31st deadline, not the comittment to make sure all our allies are safely removed from murderers who most assuredly want them dead.
Taliban leaders said Tuesday they will no longer allow Afghans to leave the country and that they expect the U.S. to complete its full military withdrawal from the Kabul airport by Aug. 31.
The declaration from Taliban spokesperson Zabiullah Mujahid at a press conference Tuesday could greatly complicate U.S. evacuation efforts. American military aircraft over the past week have flown out thousands of Afghan translators and others believed to be at risk of reprisal from the Taliban, but the insurgent group — which controls checkpoints outside…
All the King’s horses and all the King’s men couldn’t put humpty Biden back together again, and the polls are bearing that out. With all the herculean support by the DNC machine, its media, its cultural gatekeepers, its agit prop news war rooms, the DNC cannot save this man from his own embarrasing ineptness as more and more Americans are discovering in real time what it’s like to have a zombie President.
As Afghanistan reveals his cowardice and indifference to American and allied life, his polls have now hit 41 percent appproval, the lowest since office, and lower even than what Trump experienced while in office even though the DNC machine did eveything it could to drive the approval down lower. Humpty dumpty had a great fall and is still falling, even as we speak.
President Biden’s approval rating sunk to a new low of 41 percent in the latest poll from USA Today/Suffolk University.
The United States’ Afghanistan withdrawal seems to be one of the the main drivers — only 26 percent of responsdents approve of the execution of the plan (though a majority still support exiting the country) — and he has poor marks on immigration issues and his handling of the economy, as well. The latter came in at a “surprisingly bad” 39 percent. “The only issue keeping him remotely in the game is his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, where he is barely at 50 percent” David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk Political Research Center, told USA Today.
It’s just one poll, of course, and Biden’s approval numbers were significantly better, if still lower than they had been, in a pair of surveys from CBS News and NBC News over the weekend. Still, though, the USA Today/Suffolk poll puts his Real Clear Politics average at just 46 percent, two points under…
Ivo Fysic- 49 percent of Americans support government censorship to protect them frommisinformation. 59 percent of Americans prefer the Corporations fill the role of protecting them from misinformation. What does that say about America today? –
PGC – Pew released a poll result that is sure to concern the remnant of Americans who still see the pragmatic usefulness of preserving and even re-instating, the standards of the Bill of Rights across this broken land.
In a span of 3 years, after the rise of corpowoketarianizm, after the onslaight of Covidtopia (to the few who benefit from shuttting down and stigmatizing most of humanity), Americans are growing weary of the responsibility of being adults that steward their own lives. In 2018, a shocking 39 percent of Americans supported government censorship to keep disinformation from reaching the masses. Today, that number stands at an even more shocking 49 percent.
As if to give some comfort, the polling data also shows that 59 percent of Americans prefer the Corpowoketarianz control the definition of truth and lock all unorthodoxy out of the digital public square. Americans are afraid of being adults.
We have been infantalized, and our politicians increasingly talk to us as if we are children, and enact laws and emergency orders assuming that we are. If this poll is a true reflection of the spirit of America, well, the infantalization is complete. Americans are afraid of being adults and they can’t imagine anyone else being adults either, unless they’re experts or government officials or badged ‘officers.’
Americans lack the basic understanding of liberty to see that surrendering the definition of truth to the powerfully advantaged will only result in one thing, disinformation becomes truth and truth becomes disinformation. The powers that be have a new toy, and Americans across this land have consensually handed that power over to them. At a time when we have little to even connect with one another as Americans through, these Americans are turning their backs on the Bill of Rights, for freedom is something that only responsible adults can face with courage, and this land is not a land of adults.
The children’s crusade is officially begun, to borrow from Kurt Vonnegut. The chidlren are leading a sucide war against the remaining adults with the hope that, at the end, after a few more people disappear, deliverance from fear arrives and puppies and lollipops roll across the skies for your amusement.
These crusades end in death, for the target, and for the targeting. The children don’t survive the campaign. And those that do, are never whole again. America, grow up, it’s time to take on your stewardship, it’s time to stand up for your Bill of Rights and your neighbor’s as well.
According to a Pew Research poll out this month, 48% of adult Americans say the U.S. government should take steps to restrict false information online; even if it means limits on freely publishing or accessing content. That number is up from 39% who said that in 2018.
More Americans, 59%, would rather see tech companies take on misinformation.
Pew’s data shows the divide between Democrats and Republicans on this issue has widened in the past three years. In 2018, 40% of Democrats, or people who leaned Democratic, and 37% of Republicans, or people who leaned Republican, said the U.S. government should take steps to restrict false information. In 2021, it was 65% and 28%, respectively.
“What we’re seeing is just kind of a reaction to what they are hearing from the politicians that they are voting for and from the media that they’re consuming,” said Andrew Selepak, a social media professor at the University of Florida.
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
