Bill Collier

Democrat Governors And Nursing Home Covid-19 Deaths

Bill Collier February 16, 2021

Why Did Democrat Governors Send Covid-19 Patients Into Nursing Homes, Killing Tens of Thousands of People?

Bill Collier- Hot take: did Cuomo and other Democrat governors send Covid-19 patients into nursing homes in order to boost the death rate and blame the then Administration? Would people elected to such an office stoop this low? Are they truly that sociopathic? Was this really all about winning the election?

Federal resources, like an entire hospital ship and portable pop-up hospitals, were deployed but Democrat Governors refused to use these resources, while blaming Trump, and instead sent sick people into nursing homes KILLING possibly hundreds of thousands of people.

Was this the aim all along? I don’t have an answer. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. So I can’t say this is true.

The deaths resulting were in fact used to both justify lockdowns and to denigrate the the President. The deaths and hysteria were also used to excuse election rules and laws changes that exclusively benefited one Party and create an opaque vote counting process that has undermined confidence and resulted in conspiracy theories. Mail-in voting has too many holes and leaves too many opportunities for fraud, which seems to suit Democrats just fine.

Was this the end goal or just a case of partisans taking advantage of a crisis substantially of their own making to game the system and give themselves an edge?

I can say it was tragic for the victims and, regardless of the real motivation, it amounts to manslaughter through gross neglect on a mass scale. Whatever legal term applies here, Cuomo and other governors, like Pennsylvania’s Wolf, seem to be guilty and richly deserve to be tried for their crimes.

The casualties include the dead who didn’t need to die, the election system itself, our economy, and our civil liberties. It’s a serious matter which I do not anticipate will be fairly addressed in this morally depraved and corrupt society.

My Stance On Trump

Bill Collier February 13, 2021

Opinion by Bill Collier- There are two opposing forces when it comes to Trump: those for whom he is the great Satan and those who have made him a totem for popular rage against the machine.

Both sides insist you join them or you are not a good person. If you don’t want to convict Trump, you are complicit in his crimes. If you criticize Trump and don’t see in him a banner for freedom or whatever, then you are part of the nevertrump establishment.

Trump has never been the leader of a spiritually moral freedom movement, he has not been an example of spirituality or moral virtue, not in his mannerisms or behavior or even his policies. Whether or not he is a great Satan and badnic doesn’t matter for two reasons: most of his accusers are no better than him and have no right to judge in others what they constantly do and Trump is no longer President.

Whether Trump can be or will be something of a force or benefit to some level of rage against the machine remains unknown. I have never, ever, felt he was our deliverer or champion, if be “we” I mean the righteous who love God and wish to be free to worship and serve Him in peace.

I have felt Trump was a means of throwing the machine off and maybe buying some time for building a spiritual and moral freedom movement based on mutual self-reliance and support. I discovered during the Trump reign that the people who supported him, to a large degree, were happy to make him their totem, “trust the plan”, and sit back while he did the dirty work. They weren’t interested in starting a local freedom cluster of some kind to become self-sufficient or to urge local officials to pledge allegiance to the Bill of Rights.

I know. I reached hundreds of thousands of people with such messages and the response was generally apathetic. Constantly being told to trust the plan and to “vote red” instead of seeing people act was the entire result for four whole years. Oh, it was all going to be better in 2020 when Trump and the GOP swept all branches of government and removed the old establishment types.

I did not believe that would be sufficient even if it did happen, and to be honest I thought it would. I also thought that if it did happen it would not really change the trajectory toward a decline of decency and freedom, with the former being the cause of the latter. I had hoped that we would see a delay and a reprieve, but, honestly, 2016 WAS that delay and reprieve and, for the most part, “conservatives” kept their focus on national elections and fritted away the breathing room.

In 2018, the feckless Republicans led by Paul Ryan and his merry band of outer party collaborators with the left lost the House after having thwarted the President and thumbed their nose at his supporters. Trump did his part by trying to bully these folks and burn bridges with them in stunning ways that I would never have conceived any professional would have ever done.

During those two years, we built The Trump Revolution page on Facebook to over 110,000 followers and every effort to urge these folks to not just sit around but to redeem the time and build local freedom efforts was ignored.

We wanted Trump to succeed but we also felt that he was no totem or substitute for local freedom-building efforts. Trump bought us some breathing room, that was the main thing.

Now that breathing room may be gone soon or substantially lessened. Our options for building freedom and insulating our lives from the freedom takers will shrink as each new law, regulation, or executive order are promulgated.

My focus and concern has moved past Donald Trump. He had all the power for 2 years and most for 4 years and he wasn’t able to make substantial and lasting changes. And now they want to cancel him thoroughly and for good then use his damaged brand as a weapon to silence or deplatform anyone caught having been a supporter. Whoever you are, if you suddenly feel the need to publicly flagellate yourself over your former support of Donald Trump, or even your unwillingness to pillory him every day since he announced his run, then you are not safe.

A political persecution has context that always go beyond the facts of the case.

In my upcoming book detailing a future civilization that emerges by 2147 AD, I describe a Crown Commonwealth of Upadaria as something like a more globally distributed empire of freedom that fulfills America’s promise, albeit in a novel form of sovereignty not limited to territorial sovereignty and statehood as we understand it today. Nonetheless, it has some superficial elements and uses some of the language we associate with states and governments.

This is relevant to point out that were Donald Trump to be a high official in this Crown Commonwealth, and instead of having one powerful head it has a plurality of top Officials, namely 37 High Regents, his conduct and rhetoric would have resulted in a veto, censure, and eventually removal. In our terms of understanding the right conduct of high officials, neither Trump nor his chief accusers and prosecution would pass muster.

Indeed, in this fictional Crown Commonwealth, many of today’s highest officials would not be able to be qualified through the nobility of merit in the first place.

When I am being asked whether I think Trump deserved conviction in his impeachment trials I find myself disinterested. Conviction or not, it matters little to me. It means nothing either way, it is neither a moral statement against Trump nor a moral defense. The context of the political prosecution and the people doing the prosecution actually do and must matter.

The ones throwing stones have themselves made a hash of the US Constitution, a filthy rag out of the Bill of Rights, and a mockery of our core ideals such as Unity in diversity, Popular sovereignty, Democratic equality, and Rule of law. None of these jackals crying out for Trump’s head are without equal or worse amounts of grotesque unrighteous sin.

This doesn’t mean Trump wouldn’t be convicted of using or misusing, even abusing and debasing, his office if he were the Chancellor of the civic government of the Crown Commonwealth in our fictional future. Oh, he wouldn’t have made it too far at all. But the people prosecuting and judging him wouldn’t have made it far either.

When a band of jackals argue over who the biggest jackal is, I choose to lose interest. It’s not my fight. I would have removed them all for many instances of abuse of their office and gross neglect of the people who elected them.

This is not a case of me saying, “Trump did bad, but…” This is me saying: a band of jackals are fighting over which of them is a jackal. I just don’t see how this is interesting or useful.

I recognize in this show trial and blatant hypocrisy that convicting Trump and somehow righting a wrong and protecting the Republic has nothing at all to do with this process. I recognize that the prosecution are playing dirty pool and have zero moral basis to judge others. I recognize that their true aim isn’t anything more than neutralizing their opponents and creating a de facto “democratic” one-party state where they have monopoly power.

Call that authoritarianism or totalitarianism or dictatorship, or whatever. The end result is less freedom for me. Convicting Trump wouldn’t make my life better or more free or do one thing to protect us from unscrupulous jackals abusing their office to our collective disadvantage.

You cannot separate a political act from its potential effect, be it harm or benefit, or from those who are engaged. This isn’t about any kind of justice or morality. If it were, my interest would be higher and I would have studied all the claims and counter claims more thoroughly.

Trump has, for me, not been a champion as I would prefer, nor a disappointment. I was not surprised that elections at the national levels were insufficient to move the needle toward America becoming that which we have yet to achieve: an empire of freedom with liberty and justice for all. I was not surprised that Trump could neither fully achieve lasting results for his own revolution nor that, even if he had, it would be sufficient or entirely beneficial. Some of his aims and goals were contrary to a freedom agenda that would benefit all.

The disappointment I had and have and that I hope people can prove to be without merit is that many who love freedom predicated on righteous standards and virtue did not redeem the time when they had less opposition and more opportunities. They did not build deeper and broader connections beyond mere national elections, they focused almost solely on this and nothing else and, in the end, now face a wilderness experience.

I have already heard: 2022 is coming, we have to take back the House!

And so it continues. What little time we may have before the options for building freedom locally and independently will shrink to a minimum is being wasted. As we focus on “winning the House” we essentially concede the next two years. And when that fails, they will start talking about 2024. Two more years, as more and more gaps for freedom shrink and close and your options become more scarce and expensive and as your risk of being punished for speaking truth to power also grow.

I can predict people will not like this article. They will say: vote red in 2022, trust the Plan, Trump’s got this! They will say all we have the Supreme Court and we will win back the House and the Senate. The Democrats will back off knowing they will lose if they keep this up.

What they won’t do is change their routine and actually connect with local freedom builders. They won’t attend town meeting and city council meetings and join in demanding they sign off on a Bill of Rights Sanctuary Resolution. They won’t build victory gardens or their own emergency energy facilities or even form clubs to prepare for disasters (we are NOT talking “militias”).

Trump could have behaved more like a leader than a reality TV star and he could have urged a return to the basics of personal moral virtue and local self-reliance. He could have echoed the kinds of things we have been saying, and I am certain he saw some of them. Instead, Trump let himself become a totem and promised that, as long as people donated to him and attended his rallies and then protests in his name, that he would defeat the swamp and Make America Great Again.

This didn’t happen. It doesn’t matter if he tried or if for a time he had things moving in the right direction. Like Josiah, Trump thought if only he could get rid of the “high places” and those who built them that all would be well.

All wasn’t well because the deeper spiritual renewal wasn’t sought and the more practical local freedom movement wasn’t nurtured: people weren’t paid to professionally broadcast a vision and organize people and then mobilize them for action.

Our inability and unwillingness to at least FUND a local-to-national effort with professionals being paid to SERVE the movement, instead of the other way around, is what will be the end of freedom in this land and the end of our Union unless things change.

This has always been my focus and my prize and it has eluded me. Guys like Trump have always managed to suck all the air out of the room and garner all the support and energy for things that cannot last.

The left has built a solid local to national infrastructure and even its own culture-bearing institutions and has patiently done so do for almost 100 years. When they lose they look for 100 ways to pay 100 professionals to try different avenues and approaches to move the needle even just a little.

We look for big sensational wins and when that doesn’t happen we sulk away and take our marbles home with us. The PEOPLE we need to actually administrate a “revolution”, as the left has, are left to starve on the vine while the “well fed” right, the ones now screeching about Trump, live off the fat of the land and our donations and patronage.

After the loss, regardless of how you think it was orchestrated, we should have redoubled our financial support for efforts like The Freedomist. We had enough support to reach over 15 million people and begin to get a positive “America Is Good” message to counter the Cancel America crowd. But after the election when we could have kept the momentum going, support did not come from other sources and momentum was lost.

There is no digital to local movement to start to win back the land from the freedom takers one municipality and county at a time. We have no patience or wisdom in this. We, collectively, looked to Trump to save us when we should have been saving ourselves. We should have redeemed the time.

Is it too late?

First, I don’t think the current trajectory is straight down. I do think electoral victories are possible if we are vigilant against election and voter fraud in the places where we have control, e.g. where we have majorities. I do think the freedom takers will have setbacks and face real obstacles.

Second, the process of consolidation is not overnight and not all institutions, I’m looking at you Counties and States, are totally controlled by the freedom takers.

Third, technology is still a decentralization factor that it will be more and more difficult to contain and block. People will find ways to opt-out and to remove themselves from the jurisdiction or awareness of the freedom takers.

It isn’t over yet. But it will be, eventually. If we persist in our present trajectory as a dissenting movement that acts like the Washington Generals to the Haarlem Globetrotters, then within a few years, maybe less, most of the gaps for freedom will be blocked or closed. We will witness the final curtain for freedom and perhaps because of this the dissolving of our Union.

As for Trump, he is neither the greatest Satan nor the great deliverer. He is a deeply flawed man who fritted away his own own legacy because, having made himself a totem, he could only focus on that.

But Trump benefited from the short-sighted hero worship of his supporters, he didn’t create it. And his supporters genuinely believed and wanted a better world that they thought one man elected to the Presidency could deliver if only they gave him money and went to his rallies.

Trump is not the issue here, one way or another, and that has always been my stance on Trump. We are the issue. Our own laziness and desire to see others do our work for us and our own failures to take personal moral responsibility for freedom in our own backyard are the problem.

If anyone should have faced impeachment in a classic sense of the term, perhaps it is us.

Gina Carano Firing Is Aimed At Intimidating Dissenters

Bill Collier February 13, 2021

Popular. Likeable. Capable. Like Pedro Pascal, Gina Carano somewhat wears her politics on her sleeve. Like Pedro she made a comparison of her opponents to the Nazis, which is generally bad form in most circles.

But Pedro is being feted and adored and being offered new gigs while Gina is being sacked and pilloried.

What’s the the real difference, except their respective politics? Gina’s politics are not favored by the billionaire robber baron class who use wokeness and race as a form of distraction from their many crimes against humanity. Gina is part of the dissent. Gina is a beloved actress who portrays a popular character. Taking her out of a hit series that finally racked up some wins for the whole Star Wars franchise, crushed under a cancel freedom agenda out of step with its fans, is pure messaging.

The old adage about tyranny is that one doesn’t have to shoot all the rebels, one only has to publicly execute a few to frighten the many.

While milquetoast faux “conservative” Ben Shapiro is also banging on about the same theme, and has offered Gina a new gig doing a movie with his outfit, the shrill-voiced, fast-talking lad also sided with Nikki Haley in her refutation of President Trump. She was basing her rather shrill depiction of a denouement of the Trump saga on outright fabrications and lies by the corpostate-party press.

Shapiro on one side of his fast-moving, ever-flapping mouth hails Gina as the stand-in for all the dissenters while, on the other hand, gleefully sucking up to the cancel America crowd when it comes to President Trump. While we support Shapiro in doing a movie with Gina Carano, it is disgusting how easily distracted the man is from the truth and the big picture.

Our concern and objection isn’t that Shapiro criticizes President Trump, it is his inability to recognize the real “play” here that is designed to distract everyone from the deeper and more dangerous problem. If Trump was a so-and-so and badnick, the people opposing him and wanting him destroyed are far worse and more insidious.

The whole edifice and infrastructure of freedom is burning as crazed arsonists light more fires and Shapiro wants to carp on the guy across the street who won’t mow his lawn, which the crazed arsonists want you to also be focused on.

Gina Carano is in fact a warning to all dissenters- if you don’t comply with the cancel America agenda, you will be canceled yourself. Period. This also applies to President Trump: what better “public cancelation” could there be?

We are not of the sort to make anyone, including Trump, our totem for freedom. Trump has many deep flaws that we equate as much to his own will and character as we do to the moral and spiritual decline of this country’s culture. Trump was no worse for your own welfare and freedom than any other President, perhaps better, and the shrill-voiced over-the-top reactions and denunciations of the entire establishment were never warranted by actual events.

President Trump did not, in the end, fully comprehend the forces arrayed against him nor the malevolent intent and implacable opposition to him as a symbol of dissent. Additionally, President Trump was all too prone to gift his opponents with many gaffs and erratic content that was easily inflated into hysterics to delegitimize him.

There are many cases where Trump’s words are twisted into hideous caricatures, but in many of those cases even a novice Public Relations professional would not have opened the doors to such exaggeration. As Trump has chosen to be his own solo voice in all things PR and has refused professional counsel, he is like a novice lawyer who is his own counsel in a major legal case of extreme import.

Turning this into an opportunity to illegitimize every opponent is beyond the pale. But Trump certainly brought this on himself and us and his over-the-top conduct was and remains worthy of censure. So, why not censure him and move on?

The point isn’t that President Trump colors outside the lines or does things we or others may consider also beyond the pale. The establishment doesn’t care if you are beyond the pale in terms of morality or the Bill of Rights or the Constitution. They only care if you encourage dissent from their cancel America agenda.

Many Presidents have gone further than President Trump in fomenting crises and lowering the discourse. They were doing so in a way that didn’t encourage actual meaningful dissent from the ruling class of the corporate-government industrial complex. (In our shorthand we call this the “corpostate.”)

Gina Carano could have chosen her form of dissent better, as could her co-star, Pedro Pascal have chosen his form of slavish mimicking of the corpostate’s cancel America agit prop.

But Gina was fired and Pascal was feted. See the difference? It’s OK to be a rube or even a nogoodnic if you are not fanning the flames of actual dissent.

Outright encourage your followers to burn, loot, and harass to make a political statement and that’s fine as long as your ire isn’t directed at those who truly hold power and exploit the nation’s institutions for their benefit at our expense. The red rags of race and wokeness, genderlessness, and all these other things keep everyone fighting and not paying attention to the ruling class as they dismantle freedom and cancel America.

The game is: keep the raging bull of rigteous indignation going after the red rags while you, the real threat, plunge spears into it until it dies. The raging bull is what’s left of your dignity and freedom as a sovereign spiritual being made in the image of God.

The true target of all this isn’t Gina, or even Trump. In Gina’s case we argue for innocence, whereas Trump hasn’t comported himself well at all, regardless of the reasons why or the betrayals and disloyalty he has had to endure which might drive anyone to lash out. One may understand that perhaps few would react better, but the totemization of Trump isn’t going to help us nor is the demonizing of Trump, even if you think it is deserved.

Instead of merely defending some stand-in for our own fight for dignity and respect as free people, we need to focus on the true enemy here: a ruling class who want to end freedom and cancel America.

Whether you are for or against Trump or a registered Democrat versus a registered Republican or Independent, you are the target here. Your slavish giving of your vote, your consumption of their products, and your under-compensated labor are demanded on pain of being canceled. You can riot and protest all you want against your fellow Americans and demand things of no consequence to the ruling class. But you cannot aim your words or actions at the true problem: a ruling class who think they own us.

We must aim our ire at the real foe and we mustn’t be distracted by red rags, like wokism or Trump or whatever. The real issue with the people wanting to cancel others is that they are not morally qualified to judge anyone.

We will stand up to the corpostate goons and for your dignity and freedom as a spiritually sovereign human being! We will not be distracted because we know, as with the firing of Gina Carano, that the real target of all this is our meaningful dissent from their cancel America agenda.

For this reason we urge you to support the Freedomist. Our effort to promote true local free press operations and the creation of freedom sanctuaries as well as to inform and inspire you with premium content deserve your support, we think.

Join us now! Click here for options.

The Never-Ending War Against Freedom With Justice For All

Bill Collier January 13, 2021

Bill Collier- Democrats are masters of projection and manipulation. They are very bad at policy, all their policies have tended to make life worse for the working middle class and only better for mega donor corporations, special interests, foreign powers who may secretly back them, and their own political class. But for all that, this army of conmen and conwomen, who can’t even muster the moxy to identify gender as a real and biological thing, are good at narrative and presentation.

Of course it’s easy for them. They now have their totalitarian followers, who breathlessly and shamelessly call for banning and canceling anyone right of Che Guevara, in all top positions in all major US institutions. They have weaponized everything from cartoons to courts, from banks to boardrooms, from classrooms to doctor’s offices. There is no space where, when they get power, they don’t use it in an abusive and authoritarian manner.

This has been a slow-motion war against freedom with justice for all, lasting almost 100 years. It’s not that they were deliberately careful and wanted to take 100 years, it’s more they are that inept, even with all this power, and their ideas themselves are so baneful to decent people once those ideas are made known.

This war is against freedom with liberty and justice for all, people are targets only insofar as they resist the advance toward final victory. But, regardless of all the sensational and ill-sourced reports or the ramblings of back benchers, their war isn’t going to succeed at this time.

They don’t want people to have the dignity of agency but to be managed and corralled, for their own good, not even being able to own anything, as “the great reset” intoned.

They don’t want liberty, as defined by the original spirit and intent of the US Bill of Rights, which they treat as an impediment to their vision for society. This is why we support the idea of local, county, and state governments passing some sort of “Bill of Rights Sanctuary” resolution, law, or policy.

And as to justice, they make a mockery of it by evoking it repeatedly but as a mere cover for injustice: white shaming and white guilt garbage being just the tip of the iceberg. The targets of their “justice” are then doled out a pittance that renders them dependent and takes away their human dignity and told to be happy with it.

Where they have absolute power, the cities, they have turned them into plantations. Black and brown people are caught in a cycle of crime and poor education, with dead-end jobs and a welfare system that dehumanizes people and forces the destruction of the nuclear family: you get more money as a single mom.

The effect is that black and brown people become vote farms and cheap labor and even as Democrats are the ones ruling over them and making their life hell, they tell them that it’s all the fault of whites or conservatives. If only Republicans cared more and agreed more deficit spending and handouts and more and more wealth redistribution, all would be well.

Democrats have only one set of skills: using legerdemain and even borderline to actually illegal and unethical tactics, dirty pool on steroids, to destroy their opponents, to suppress dissent, and to create false narratives, all for the sake of power. They don’t want a two-party or multi party state, they want a monopoly on power from which their opponents can never recover. And they don’t care if they have to lie or cheat to get there.

If anyone asks me the ideology of the Democrats, I would say it is power, period. They have no soul as a Party. They will align with radical Islamic fascists, black supremacists, outright communists, modern robber barons who turn workers into slaves, and any other unscrupulous and inhumane group that will give them power.

The GOP has its own venile roots and aims, but I’ll leave that off for now as no sane person can think the GOP is capable of getting or keeping, let alone wielding, power in anything like a coherent manner. The GOP is a feckless cackle of old women wringing their hands and worried about the sound of their own shadows.

The Democrats’ slow motion and relentless war is not complete, though once again they think they are on the cusp of total dominion and monopoly power forever. They go too far. They literally think half the country whom they continually vilify and now want to disenfranchise will just quietly accept their chains and shut their mouths.

I don’t think this is happening. It’s not likely. But, first, it is within the realm of possibilities, and, second, an attempted crime doesn’t make you less of a criminal. Democrats are totalitarian thugs who should never be allowed close to power as long as they hold to their monopoly power ideology and continue their slow motion war against freedom with justice for all!

Our Web 3.0 Approach

Bill Collier January 10, 2021

Bill Collier- The Freedomist Network of sites, web properties, email lists, and other projects will take a web 3.0 approach to building a multi-faceted, distributed news and content alternative to the monopoly platforms.

The main Freedomist site will eventually be hosted on a new platform, hosted on its own hardware in three locations. But our larger network of other properties will mostly be WordPress-based (until we develop our own web 3.0 CMS). The main subscription site for higher level paid content will be on this new platform and if you subscribe here you will eventually gain access to that new platform.

Overall, our goal is to move away from web 2.0 and toward web 3.0 as rapidly and orderly as possible.

Called “Upadaria”, the new web 3.0 platform will allow us to have Freedomist.com and all its content and emails delivered to you securely and in a way that the monopolies will not easily be able to disrupt. This new platform will be capable of hosting other sites as well that comply with the UPDR Ideals and our Freedomist Pledge, which is basically the Bill of Rights.

This will come in handy once we get to over 150,000 to 250,000 paid subscribers on this WordPress install. It is likely we will secure our own physical hardware for this WordPress site and move from hosted servers owned by third-party providers. Part of your crowdfunding support, through paid subscriptions, will help us to support the creation of the new platform and our larger, dispersed and multi-faceted Freedomist Network.

(We will also be building the core support structures and team for our Christ-centered Freedom Movement which we want to see have a strong presence in every county and every Congressional District in this country.)

What constitutes The Freedomist Network will be bigger than this site or our main hub on the new platform. We will have other sites, some membership based, for niches, states, and locales, many in some form of joint venture or franchise arrangement. We are working on the modality.

As we have said, our goal is to expand and grow our already and decentralized network covering many niches and territories in this country. Sponsors or advertisers can even now reach millions of people through this network without depending on the monopoly platforms.

The new platform is just part of a larger plan to build a web 3.0 infrastructure that is not easily interfered with in any of its parts and is almost impossible to entirely shut down. Redundancy of sites and efforts is also part of our plan, it is designed to make it harder to cut off one central head and thereby terminate our effort.

Other efforts simply rely on being a clone of an existing monopoly platform and that have only one platform themselves. Our effort is far more comprehensive and distributed than that and doesn’t merely clone existing platforms.

What web 3.0 will look like we cannot say. But we think it will be more diverse, niche-focused, distributed, decentralized, and user-focused and more entertaining and useful at the same time. Concentrations of power and monopolies will be less and less tenable in the web 3.0 ecosystem.

What we are doing now is a progression toward web 3.0, it is getting beyond web 2.0 though still largely based on web 2.0 architecture, like this WordPress site. But in the end we will end up far from that architecture and well beyond the reach or influence of the monopoly platform companies.

It will be a marathon, not a sprint. It will have false starts and sudden stops. At times it won’t be pretty. But web 3.0 is coming and the monopoly platform won’t be able to do much more than possibly delay it slightly, if at all.

The Cancel America Agenda Must Be Defeated In Our Hearts

Bill Collier November 11, 2020

We must gather together exclusively with fellow freedom builders to defeat the cancel America crowd in our hearts, lives, communities, and nation!

By Bill Collier- The subtlety of subconsious manipulation is insidious and both mentally and morally corrupting in its influence. Even people who consciously reject the spiritual and moral premises of something can be influenced subconsciously to limit their thinking to its programmed parameters. In essence, the horizon of your potential is restricted in your own mind by hidden agents of influence.

The Cancel America agenda is just such a corrupting influence in our hearts. It is all-present and always under the surface of everything the corpostate ruling classes control. Your news and entertainment, your platforms, your games, and especially corporate policies all come from the place of saying and believing America is bad or racist or something that isn’t true and has never been true in the general sense.

If you examine your instincts about what to say in public, you will find the cancel America agenda governs your tongue, often for fear of being canceled yourself. But a society in which truth is suppressed in public discourse and where the ones who know the truth are cowed into silence is a dying society that has numbered its days.

Eventually, if this continues, your progeny will grow up in a land in which every voice and influence will pressure them into unconscious and unthinking acceptance of this cancel America agenda and its philosophical foundations. But it won’t stop there: they will be compelled to applaud and participate in the excess of depravity lest they be shunned and canceled. They will either grow up in a living hell by being punished for holding fast to truth or they will become deceived and morally compromised, no longer able recognize the truth.

Wanton self-indulgence in personal moral behavior, based on the lowest carnal pleasures (“excess of riot”), always goes hand-in-hand with collective control by the very few over the very many. In short, moral corruption leads to the kind of political and corporate overlordship (we call this the “corpostate” for short) we all sense is emerging. When the “corpostate” press arbitrarily proclaim the next President and suppress both all contrary news and news about his corruption, you know you are witnessing the end of individual freedom or accountability of the rulers to the ruled.

It all starts in your own heart. You are being corrupted into either silence or compliance, or both, with regards to a cancel America agenda and beliefs you find spiritually and morally reprehensible. You are not just being deplatformed online, your voice is being deplatformed in your workplace, among family, and in public.

People are losing their voice, knowing that the voices that are favored are saying things that are not true and that, if followed, will lead to the creation of a living hell for their own progeny. This is truly the dystopian nightmare of science fiction coming to pass before our eyes.

Your silence or just reticence to speak out is a crushing defeat to your very soul. Deep down this disturbs you and makes you feel dirty, incomplete, like a sellout.

The core problem here is not obvious to to many people. The core problem is a lack of personal support among those who refuse to go along with or embrace the cancel America agenda. We can stand up together, very few people have the means or courage to stand alone and suffer alone for speaking the truth boldly.

You may sense that, which is why you are here.

This is no indictment of your character or worth if you feel you have been silenceld or suppressed. We need each other, we are not meant to go it alone.

Gathering together in person and online EXCLUSIVELY with fellow freedom builders is not creating an echo chamber. This is propaganda and the Party line, meant to further cow you into submission.

This hobgoblin of “the echo-chamber”is a made-up apparition that we can see is merely projection of their own intent. How do we see this projection of their intent? We see how easily any voices that deny the cancel America agenda are deplatformed!

They, the cancel America crowd, create true echo-chambers and when we seek to gather for mutual support and comfort, they decry our echo-chambers! This is insidious and we must basically confront it with the strongest language and cast it to hell where it belongs.

Don’t let their word-salad nonsense sway you from finding ways to gather online and in person exclusively with fellow freedom builders. This is necessary to strengthen your heart’s resolve to resist and confront the cancel America agenda and its foot soldiers wherever you find them.

By gathering exclusively with fellow freedom builders for mutual support and comfort, you can find the courage to defeat the cancel America agenda in your heart and then in your life, communities, and nation.

If you support a freedom building agenda versus the cancel America agenda, support The Freedomist now. See Www.freedomist.com to subscribe for $10/month. Or use the form below:

[pmpro_levels]

The Concept of Pomerium and Divine Protection

Bill Collier October 28, 2020

The concept of a sacred boundary is lacking depth of understanding today, and yet this can be so useful to you. A modern application of this ancient concept could change your life.

Truth is truth and it is revealed, for Christians, primarily from the Bible, although it is also seen in many other places. People can have many things wrong in their beliefs and yet also have some grasp of deeper truths. Thus it is with the ancient concepts of place, what the Romans called a “pomerium”, even though in many ways ancient pagan beliefs were fundamentally flawed.

The pomerium for the Romans was a sacred boundary around the city of Rome that rendered the whole a special precinct under the protection of the gods. It was said of Rome, that everything in this pomerium was Rome itself, everything outside was territory (ager) owned by Rome. You did not carry weapons or bury the dead within this pomerium.

We see this concept in ancient Israel, more broadly, and in the Biblical concept of how God ordains the “boundaries of habitation” for the nations. These boundaries are ordained by God, therefore we can extrapolate that a nation whose God is the Lord is blessed only within its God-ordained boundaries. If and when nations extend their rulership beyond those boundaries then to that extent they violate their pomerium, the sacred boundary, and are not under Divine protection outside that boundary.

This concept of pomerium is a sort of sacred geography. The whole earth is divided in God’s eyes a certain way, but mankind has not respected those boundaries and has therefore brought ruin and travail upon itself.

It is also true these boundaries change in God’s eyes, for nations have a set time to exist and are overthrown while new ones are created, all ordained by God. Only within those boundaries can a nation of people be blessed, outside those boundaries they cannot be blessed and the further outside their pomerium they go, the more travail they bring upon themselves.

Conceptually, pomerium is something that we can apply to our lives. As it says in Ecclesiastes, “there is a time and season for everything” and, by extension, a place. Times and seasons and place are the pomerium of our individual and collective lives as human beings: a fact modern man has lost sight of and that brings much suffering upon us all.

To find and know and stay within your individual and shared pomerium is to stay within the realm of God’s protection and provision. Going beyond this is the wilderness, where you do not have Divine favor. Too many people and whole nations dwell in the wilderness and are not witin their own pomerium.

To understand and use this ancient concept one should not take a mechanistic view, e.g. try to define it in a linear fashion or by a legal definition. Pomerium is and should be an inner felt certainty that is not easily defined in dictionary language. To be within your pomerium is not confinement or limitation, because this is a whole universe which you can never fully explore in your lifetime.

While pomerium is conceptually applicable to your own life and being within the Divine pomerium of God’s possibilities for your life, it is also a sacred geography that literally applies to the lands of this earth and how God divides them.

All nations of people, and their kingdoms, have a pomerium in God’s eyes. If they remain within their pomerium and if God is their Lord, then they will experience Divine provision and protection within their pomerium. To the extent these nations of people follow God’s righteous standards in their way of life, from the heart and not merely from laws, and to the extent they stay within their pomerium, they will experience Divine protection and favor.

Nations and kingdoms are often connected in Scripture and in history. But they are neither synonymous nor interdependent. Both are agencies of provision within human civilization as ordained by God, the nation being a spiritual sovereignty and kingdoms being a landed sovereignty. Nations define a shared way of life while kingdoms are a magisterial authority as defined in Romans 13.

The modern nation-state attempts to and claims to merge these two things, but fails. Most nations of people, over 9000 today, do not have a corresponding and exact form of statehood and of the nearly 200 “kingdoms” recognized as political states today, few consist only of one nation of people.

A kingdom and a nation can be closely affiliated, as with the Japanese nation and its kingdom. But an “empire” such as the United States of America contains many diverse nations within its jurisdiction. An empire as we use the term isn’t a form of government but a single unitary, often decentralized, political state consisting often of multiple kingdoms and nations of people within its realm.

The pomerium of nations and of kingdoms and empires, again these terms as we use them are not referring to forms of government, is not the same as or interdependent of the pomerium of nations of people. We know this as a fact of history.

Land is sacred. That is, the boundaries of habitation for nations and the boundaries of the magisterium of kingdoms and empires are ordained by God and not understanding this leads to much harm and conflict. All conflict in this earth, that is all war, is rooted in a lack of understanding of the pomerium and violations thereof.

If all nations and all kingdoms and empires each followed God’s righteous standards for that agency of God’s provision to human civilization and stayed within their pomerium, then we would have peace!

Think then of the realms of kingdoms and the homelands of nations. These are rarely synonymous, some nations have homelands distributed among multiple kingdoms, e.g. the Kurds. Many kingdoms or empires contain multiple nations and homelands within their borders.

Pomerium is not static, neither for kingdoms nor for nations. But at any given moment there is a perfect optimal which, if ever achieved, leads to global peace. One day, in fact, Jesus will physically reign in this earth and He will establish all these pomeriums in perfection: every nation and kingdom will respect and be blessed within its pomerium!

We cannot set ourselves up as judges over these matters! No human agency, such as the UN, no Nimrod 2.0, can delineate or determine these boundaries of habitation (nations) or landed sovereignty (kingdoms).

It is a frustrating, from the human perspective, reality that the understanding and appropriation of God’s truth cannot be grasped in purely mechanist or legalistic terms and that no human authority is a Solo Grandee over such matters. The “milk of the Word” truths of the Gospel and Christian universals of doctrine and basic morality can be so defined, but even here if one merely understands these things in a mechanistic and legalistic manner, one has too limited an understanding of these things.

Concepts such as pomerium, while we can extrapolate them from the Bible and history, are less amenable to such mechanistic definitions than the Christian universals.

This takes us to a specific application on two scores: the redefining of landed sovereignty beyond contiguous territory and the redefining of homelands in the same way. We may be witnesses to a new and more enlightened form of non-territorial statehood through the web and of the reassertion of nationhood as something intentionally adopted by each individual.

These new forms of statehood and nationhood will not necessarily replace the old forms, which are rooted in contiguous territories and blood ancestry. The emergence of non-territorial states and of intentional nations will not displace the old forms any time soon.

To add to the confusion, this does not mean pomerium no longer applies, it means it will apply differently. A non-territorial state may serve diverse nations of people and individuals around the world who may also be part of territorial states and ancestral nations. Likewise, an intentional nation of people may have its members distributed around the world who are also each connected to an ancestral nation and both a territorial and non-territorial state.

For you as an individual there are potentially five primary forms of pomerium: your own individual pomerium, the pomerium of your territorial state, the pomerium of a non-territorial state, the pomerium of your ancestral nation or nations, and the pomerium of an intentional nationhood.

While few people are conscious of any one of these pomeriums, we propose that those who are conscious of and who respect these pomeriums will find much less conflict and far more success and happiness in this life.

Might we we one day live in a world of non-territorial statehood and intentional nationhood? This is not really a question we ask as such. What we envision is that these new forms of kingdoms and nations will emerge and will lead to blessings and provisions being released which have not been released before.

The legal structures and framework for these new entities will also emerge. We generally tend to propose the form of a cryptonation platform as the basis of a non-territorial “empire of liberty” with a virtual-to-local approach coupled with hub communities and intentional networks as a new form of non-territorial statehood. We also generally see the convergence of legal structures such as NGO’s, fraternal benefit societies, and tribal/domestic nation statuses as a new form of intentional nationhood.

The ancestral nation and the territorial state are unlikely to go away any time soon, and we cannot be sure they ever should go away. But their ability to cope with and accommodate these newer forms of statehood and nationhood may be vital to their long-term success.

In the Upadaria project we see the potential for developing a new model and framework, a new bleuprint and architecture, which we define as the makings of a new Christian civilization. This civilization, as it emerges organically from the proclaimation of its ideals and vision, will potentially attract territorial and non-territorial states and both ancestral and intentional nations.

One of the key foundations of this emerging civilization is the intentional application and understanding of the pomerium from a Biblical and historical perspective, but applied to a modern and cyber-connected world in new ways.

This is not new or hidden knowledge. God’s truths are eternal but their application and expression are both diverse and evolving. On one hand, the world is growing more evil and manifesting its final state before judgment. On the other hand, a remnant of people within the Body of Christ who exist within this world right now is growing more in harmony with its ideal and perfect state before the final Return of Christ.

The manifestation, expression, and even understanding of nations and kingdoms has evolved over time. Even within Scripture we see this evolution, as with Israel and the Jewish people from the time of Abraham to the Diaspora after the New Testament.

Even when a pomerium is not just in one contiguous place but is distributed to wherever people within a non-territorial state or an intentional nationhood dwell and gather together here and there, the concept of pomerium remains connected to its eternal definition and application.

Your understanding of YOUR PLACEMENT within any pomerium, as we have described it, sets your own boundaries of habitation within which are endless possibilities and great favor but outside of which you will only find wilderness. We are of the conviction that for every person there is a pomerium which may include all or a few of these things: that of a territorial state of which they are citizens, that of a non-territorial state of which they are also citizens, that of any number of ancestral nations they identify with, and that of a particular intentional nationhood that identify with.

We do not propose that every Christian should be part of our particular manifestation of non-territorial statehood or distributed intentional nationhood. It may be that this is not God’s way for your life! We certainly don’t expect or want people to dishonor or disrespect their territorial statehood or their ancestors.

What we envision is the intentional nested identity of all these things in a way that reflects God’s righteous standards and as pursued by individuals without any form of coercion. This is not about imposing our terms, definitions, and standards but it is about broadcasting them to the world and giving individuals a chance to embrace and utilize them if they choose.

When we consider pomerium we see within this sacred boundary God’s unlimited possibilities and provisions. We see this as a border protected by Angels so that we need fear nothing that can harm our souls. (As to suffering and offenses, it is clear, in this life, we will all suffer such things, but our soul will be safe.)

So if then you own a piece of land and declare it, as God leads, within any pomerium, such as an intentional spiritual nationhood, this boundary is thereby protected by God Himself. This doesn’t mean you secede from the state or stop paying taxes! This is a spiritual boundary, not a political boundary.

As an important aside, the ACTUAL God-ordained pomerium for any kingdom or nation rarely perfectly aligns with a political border. It is good when political borders reflect the true pomerium for a landed sovereignty (kingdom), but we do not mean “political borders” when we speak of pomerium!

If you understand the “boundaries of habitation” for your life and whatever kingdom or nations of this earth God had connected you to, and you can if you seek the Lord, you will not be limited but, rather, liberated!

A Freedomist Circle- A Local and Virtual Freedom Building Activity

Bill Collier October 24, 2020

The concept of a Freedomist Circle is simple: it is a circle of Freedomists who are pledged to one another and to America for mutual support, self-preservation, self-reliance, and upholding the rights, persons, and property of each member from all hazards.

A Freedomist Circle is dedicated to the fulfillment of America’s true manifest destiny as an empire of liberty and our spiritual constitution based on our four core ideals of Unity in diversity, Popular sovereignty, Democratic equality, and Rule of law.

These can and should be informal groups of 5-30 adults who take and abide by The Freedomist Pledge and who also Pledge to one another their mutual support through all hazards. While such Freedomist Circles may come together and create more formal community clubs and networks, each Circle is independent and can operate in isolation.

Knowing people have your back is fundamental to being free and experiencing freedom. Our aim must be to encourage and support the creation of these independent Freedomist Circles and to show people how to connect with others and build these informal support groups for freedom.

A Freedomist Trust Circle is a mutual support and self-help activity using economic, social, and civic action among members mostly to support fellow members but also to nurture other Trust Circles and spread the Freedomist message person-to-person and face-to-face, outside any platforms or controlled media.

To create a Freedomist Circle, take cognizance of people who live near you and who are trustworthy and yet also devoted to America’s core ideals and liberty values as you are. Ask them if they would be willing to take and keep The Freedomist Pledge and of so, tell them about the Freedomist Circle. Set up periodic social gatherings for members to get to know one another, to hear or watch a lecture or other freedom-related content, and to ask four key questions to promote mutual benefit and support.

The four key questions include:

1. What have you done lately to increase your own level of practical freedom and/or success and prosperity and how did you do it? (This is meant to inspire and edify your peers.)

2. Does anyone need an introduction to anyone in business or any other field to help them advance in any manner? (We cannot understate the power of networking and we will use this power intentionally.)

3. Does anyone face any issue, problem, opposition, or crisis that the group might work on helpin them resolve or find the right resources to solve? (Mutual assurance of help in time of need is a power freedom tool!)

4. Does anyone have any good examples of wise advancement of freedom and success or bad examples of failure that might inform the group? ( It is vital to learn from the success and failure of others!)

The group will also assign their own Delegates to different local officials or entities and these people will report on the activies and conduct of those officials or entities to the group. Additionally, a member will be tasked with following local to national news and giving a summary at each meeting.

Freedomist Circles will keep the identity of their members confidential, respecting privacy and confidentiality at all times, although members are not prevented from making their affiliation with a Freedomist Circle known. We are not a secret society, we simply respect privacy.

A virtual Freedomist Circle is a group who meet virtually and do a lot of what a local group does, using video conferencing, but who also work on ways to use the web to help one another in their various pursuits. Generally, the group follows national news and monitors the platforms in issues related to their online freedom.

A Freedomist Circle is something you can build on your own and if you keep following us here you will learn more nuts and bolts.

A new Circle may begin with one person gathering a few friends, each of whom can nominated up to 5 people, so each friend also has their own smaller core of other friends they bring into the Circle. As the Circle grows it can them subdivide and a few members repeat the process but also stay connected to the starter Circle, creating an organic network that doesn’t have to be formal.

Generally, we envision each Freedomist having a local Circle that may gather weekly, a starter Circle they stay connected to once a month, and a virtual Circle that meets weekly but also belongs to a larger Group of Circles all started from the same Circle.

None of these Circles will use the platforms to gather and connect, they may use our platform or set up their own email lists or what have you, but they will all have each other’s personal contact information in case these means fail.

Having a Freedomist Circle in your locale and online can be a very real and practical way to not only increase your level of freedom but also your chances for success and prosperity.

My Predictions for 2020

Bill Collier October 22, 2020

I am predicting a 55% chance for a Republican sweep of the election: keep the Senate, regain the House, and keep the White House.

Let’s explore the reasoning behind this prediction, which almost every political pundit and insider will laugh at.

First, there are “the polls”, and I suspect the polling is over sampling for Democrats and desperately wants to demoralize the Republicans: their bias is beyond the pale and there is not going back for them.

The second reason are the “shy voters.”

In this cancel hysteria environment, Trump and Republican supporters are totally gun show, they don’t want their liberal family, friends, or colleagues to shine, shame, and banish them. While the proper response is to band together, shame those who shame others, and push back, the real response is the creation of a simmering plurality of shy voters who refuse to make themselves known.

We have seen accounts of these silent voters, some say silent majority, but, as can be expected, the press refuse to give much oxygen to this story. I don’t think these shy voters are the majority, but I think there are enough of them to give the GOP a sweeping win.

Indeed, taking oxygen away from the opponents of the collectivist corpostate cabal is the chief aim and characteristic of the press and their political allies, the Democrats. Deplatforming, shaming, shunning, and banishing the strongest voices from the center and right is designed to put fear in the hearts of everyone else. Call it a soft tyranny or shadow dictatorship, but one thing it isn’t is freedom.

This insidious assault of free speech and freedom of association against all opponents of the corpostate is pushing people against a wall and the general idea is that the ballot is the last and only place where one can act in opposition without directly being targeted for doing so.

And so we suppose an American populace who still wants freedom will lean toward Republicans as the only wah to voice opposition to the cirpos, whose champion is the Democratic Party. This is by no means an endorsement of the GOP, whose failures are legendary. It is the only visceral and safe way to show opposition and stick it to the man, as it were.

But the probability for this to happen isn’t overwhelming, we give this scenario a 55% chance as opposed to a host of other scenarios, which include a 33% chance Democrats sweep as cowed Americans retreat and surrender to what they feel is either inevitable or not as dangerous as some portray it.

What we cannot know with certainty is who will vote on what numbers and what is driving them. A substantial plurality of Americans totally embrace the “America is bad”, or at least in need of dramatic “reforms” and that the President and Republicans are unjust, hateful bigots with a criminal intent.

It is the press who have spread these seditious lies and smears while working mightily to suppress dissent and any evidence that contradicts their glowing praise of Democrats and practical blood libel of Republicans. The real question is: will the press’s narrative of GOP Monsters prevail or will the thirst for freedom that sees through the blood libel prevail?

To say the Press are enemies of the people is no stretch. They march in lockstep with the corpostate and its Party, the Democrats, and they evince a design of soft or shadow tyranny, mostly carried out by and through monopoly platforms that deplatform and cancel dissentors into financial and social ruin.

The corpostate cabal include old money and new money bankers who control and ally with major platforms like Amazon, Paypal, Ebay, Facebook, Twitter, and Google and the major press outlets to craft a corpostate hegemony over the lives of every single one of us. Every other institution in our entire Western Civilization belongs to or is controlled by this cabal.

Against this flow the masses who may still yearn for freedom have little more they can do, or that they THINK they can do, then to vote GOP and stick it in the eye of the corpostate goons. It is on such grounds we say the GOP has a 55% chance of a sweep.

But we have a 33% chance the rot is too deep and wide and too few American voters can think beyond or around the endless diet of sensational headlines meant to convince them that bondage is liberation and freedom is just a word for shallow carnal self-indulgence and nothing more.

If indeed after election day the corpostate and its Party win, serious Freedomists will have to find new venues and gaps for freedom outside the platforms and the dominant socioeconomic structures. Indeed, even if the GOP wins this approach must be epxlored and built, because the GOP is no Freedomist party!

The problem for Freedomists is that we have no champion. Neither Trump nor his GOP are effective and consistent champions of true freedom founded on virtue, liberty, and independence. In moral character and behavior, in ethical conduct, and in consistent devotion to the spirit of the Declaration of Independence, Trump and the GOP are at best inconsistent, “sometimes champions.”

We can name all the faults, flaws, and hypocrisy of Trump and the GOP, but as to the Democrats, we have a Party who places no other gods before itself than the corpostate ruling class, all its “woke” propaganda notwithstanding!

The Need For New Money Solutions

Bill Collier October 21, 2020

Saving, investing, spending, and earning money depends on a monetary and financial structure that is in part archaic and in part increasingly politicized. Transactions can and do disappear and some financial services providers are now cutting customers off based on their personal politics.

Both the creakiness of the financial infrastructure and the growing political bias of providers portend problems, especially for those whose personal politics don’t align with those of the ruling clase who control these institutions.

The development of new money structures to transfer wealth between parties efficiently and without regards to the ideology of the participants is a critical necessity and a great opportunity for profit. This is the democratization of finance, whereby power and control shift away from essentially 20th century industrial structures controlled by the very few, to an open-source ecosystem with a plethora of diverse providers who must cater to the public, sans bias, or die.

This isn’t just about cryptocurrency and blockchain technology, this is about apps and new financial and trade technology that can reside on your handheld device. This is also about local efforts, such as local currencies and neighborhood credit unions tapping into this new architecture and simplifying the entire process. For instance, when the customer is custodian of their data, fraud and abuse are minimized AND regulations are dramatically decreased, thus reducing costs and increasing simplicity and smoothness.

The Democratization of financial services and technology that put the power in your hands and take it away from governments and mega corporations is not only essential but inevitable. Even if “outlawed”, this decentralization cannot be stopped.