April 19, 2026

Rights Watch

Inevitable Consequences and Alamo Moments

 

 

 

 



 

On January 24th 2024, Texas Governor Greg Abbott issued a statement, concerning the right of the State of Texas to defend itself from invasion, because – quoting from the statement – the Federal Government as a body and specifically, the administration of President Joe Biden, have broken the Compact between the Several States and the Federal Government (the foundational concept that underpins the notion of the “United States of America”) by not simply pointedly and openly declining to defend the nation from a literal “invasion” at the southern border, but in actively taking measures to prevent the State of Texas from defending itself.

Abbott specifically cited the Biden administration failing to fulfill its duties under Article IV § 4 of the Constitution, which has now required Abbott, as Governor, to invoke Article 1 § 10 Clause 3 of the Constitution requiring him to take measures to defend the state.

This statement was issued on the heels of a frankly stunning decision by the United States Supreme Court on January 22nd, which allowed the US Border Patrol to remove razor wire barricades emplaced by Texas National Guard troops assigned to defend Texas’ border with Mexico along the Rio Grande River. In effect, the Supreme Court sided with the Biden administration in suborning an invasion of the United States.

The massive influx of illegal aliens is a subject we have discussed here previously. The fairest “neutral” assessment of the impact of illegal immigration comes from, of all places, Wikipedia:

 

The economic impact of illegal immigrants in the United States is challenging to measure, and politically contentious…

 

 

However, given the reactions of “sanctuary cities” – most of them longtime strongholds of the Democrat Party – to having waves of “migrants” dumped (waves that are not even comparable to the numbers being dumped on Texas) on their doorsteps, not just by Republican-led states such as Texas and Florida, but by the Federal Government itself, it is clear that the staggering numbers are having an immediate, clear and disproportionate impact on the nation (leaving aside said migrants frequently complaining bitterly about the aid and shelter they are given, including appeals to citizens to house illegal aliens in churches and private homes).

In response to Governor Abbott’s January 24th statement, many politicians have begun to hysterically demand that President Biden federalize the Texas National Guard to halt the Texas program to stem the flow of illegal migrants, and to restrict them to using the legal crossing points, and to follow the established legal processes.

This situation (which has been building for well over a decade as of this writing), and the breathless demands to invoke the Insurrection Act to stop Texas’ actions, has brought the nation perilously close to an actual “civil war”, for the first time since 1860. This is because, as of this writing, some twenty-five state Governors have definitively stated their support of Governor Abbott and the state of Texas.

Actually federalizing a state’s National Guard against the wishes of their state’s governor has been done before, famously in 1957 in Arkansas in regards to the “Little Rock Nine”. A popular misconception is that a state’s National Guard cannot be federalized without that state’s governor consenting to the mobilization. As demonstrated in Arkansas, this is patently untrue.

The National Guard was created by the Militia Act of 1903, known popularly as the “Dick Act” after its sponsor, Ohio Congressman Charles Dick (R), in response to the severe manpower shortage in the US Army in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War (1898) and the subsequent campaigns against Filipino guerrillas in the Philippines Insurrection (1899-1902).

This latter campaign was hampered by American volunteers – who had been enlisted for a period of two years – insisting on being sent home after the conclusion of the war against Spain. As those who had volunteered specifically for the war against Spain were technically still a part of the Militia of the United States, they could not be required to serve longer than the conclusion of the war unless they specifically volunteered to do so.

This manpower issue came from Article 1, § 8, Clause 15 of the “Militia Clauses” (which includes Clause 16 of the same Article and Section) of the Constitution, which strictly limits the call-up and use of the Militia to executing “…the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions…” As a result, the United States quickly found itself significantly hampered in the Philippines by not having enough troops.

The “Dick Act” was written specifically to bypass the restrictions of the “Militia Clauses”, in order to create a new military entity in the form of the National Guard (and later, the Air National Guard). In effect, the “Dick Act” created a type of reserve formation for the US Army (before the creation of the actual “Army Reserve”), which (ultimately) would be equipped and trained by the US Army, but which be paid for by the states, who would also be allowed to use the military formations within the state, at the discretion of its governor. However, if the Federal government decided that they needed to mobilize the National Guard, they could do so at any time…whether a governor agrees with the Federal government or not, as was demonstrated in 1957, in Arkansas.

In the context of the hysterical demands of partisan political hacks, this would mean that President Biden would have to declare the State of Texas to be in rebellion against the United States – something that has only happened once in United States history – in order to force the Texas National Guard to disregard the orders of its state Commander in Chief in the face of an active invasion of their state.

Stop, and consider that implication.

If President Biden were to take such an ill-advised action, that would place the Texas National Guard in the position of obeying either the Federal Government – and allowing a massive invasion of their home state by massive numbers of “military-age males”  who certainly did not walk north from homes in Mexico, or Central or South America, because “economic asylum seekers” do not buy airplane tickets from Africa to Mexico, in order to walk north…

…Conversely, the Texas National Guard could refuse orders to federalize. This would constitute “Mutiny”, under Article 94 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ, the legal code of the US armed forces), at the very least. This would place the Federal government in the position of having to arrest up to 19,000 people en masse.

In like manner, there would then be the question of the reactions of the various states and governors who have expressed their solidarity with Governor Abbott’s actions…

This perilous situation is the ultimate outcome of decades of neglect, political pandering and the abject failure of successive Federal governments to execute the most basic of their duties, duties that the Several States voluntarily allowed the Federal Government to maintain authority for, as a condition of their joining the Federal Union in 1789. Leaving aside the obtuse legalities of this situation, the reality is that the American Left – led primarily by the Democrat Party – has driven the nation to a potential breakpoint, where the States may well declare the sitting Federal Government to no longer be a legitimate body. Such an action could go in several directions, none of them good, and all of them highly dangerous.

And while pundits and armchair-warrior-gamers may believe the nearly incoherent ramblings of President Biden, the reality is that the United States military and law enforcement establishments are not able to enforce any nationwide martial law order; in fact, it is questionable if they could enforce such an order over any large metropolitan area, given what happened the last time Federal troops were deployed under “Operation Garden Plot” was engaged.

…In the end, this writer has no solution to this problem, other than telling the Federal government to do its job in securing the borders of the United States, which it has consistently failed to do for over forty years.

The alternatives are not desired by any sane person.

 

 

 

The Freedomist — Keeping Watch, So You Don’t Have To
UK Looks to Create Worldwide Gun-Control Body

The United Kingdom, who long ago deprived their citizens the right to bear arms, is looking to extend its authoritarianism over all the nations of the world, through the United Nations, calling on worldwide governance of “small arms” which, it alleges, should unite the nations of the world.

From gov.uk

(from the UK’s address to the UN):
… the diversion and misuse of small arms has an all too real human cost, claiming hundreds of thousands of lives every year.

It threatens security and sustainable development, and fuels conflict, crime, and terrorism. So let me make four points for this debate.

First, we must accelerate our collective work to reduce these threats in the coming year. At the Fourth Review Conference at the UN Programme of Action in June, we look forward to building on conclusions from the Biennial Meeting of States Parties in 2022.

… President, the effective control of small arms should unite us all. We look forward to working with other Member States to advance progress in this area.

 

Read Full Article

Nuns Against 2A Rally to Cancel it Through Lawsuit

Catholic Nuns are signing up to be willing tools of oppression by using their “good” image as a bludgeon in an emotion-led tyrannical lawsuit intended to deprive Americans of their fundamental right to self-defense. The fascist nuns are suing Smith & Wesson, demanding they stop producing the left’s favorite boogeygun, the AR-15, which is a .22 caliber semi-auto rifle that ranks rather low in terms of power among rifle calibers, a fact that won’t get in the way of this Marxist-led lawsuit.

The story came to this writer through China Daily, which is a CCP-run anti-American agitprop site, one that is fully aligned with the DNC-CCP’s assault on the 2nd Amendment, for they fear armed Americans as much as the DNC-CCP does. So we have the Catholic Church, through these fanatical, American-hating nuns, working in de facto cooperation with the CCP, who murders Christians daily, to disarm Americans, making it easier for both the DNC-CCP and the CCP to murder Americans more easily.

From the DNC-CCP’s frenemy, China Daily:

A group of activist Catholic nuns in the US on Tuesday sued the board of gunmaker Smith & Wesson to abandon the manufacture, marketing and sale of its version of the AR-15 rifle assault-style rifle that has been used in US mass shootings.

The nuns — who hold about 1,000 shares collectively of Smith & Wesson — filed the so-called shareholder derivative action in Nevada state court that alleges the publicly traded company’s leaders are putting shareholders at risk by the way they have made and sold the rifle.

“These rifles have no purpose other than mass murder,” the nuns said in a statement.

That’s right, these barely literate nuns actually believe the AR-15 is designed ONLY for mass murder, not protection, not hunting, just mass murder. Any judge that fails to dismiss this fascist lawsuit deserves to go to jail for the rest of his or her life, preferably in Gitmo, with an Islamist fanatic who will be given free rein to do what Islamists do to non-Islamists. Then the Judge will appreciate the value of the 2nd Amendment.

NY Kangaroo Court Denies Evidence That Destroys its Case

The NY Kangaroo Court fraud trial Judge denied President Trump an opportunity to submit into evidence a disclaimer statement to all his financial transactions that destroys the entire case of the fraudulent trial. The disclaimer statement shows that valuations of properties are subjective to interpretation.

Lawfare Assassin judge Arthur Engoron refused to allow Trump to submit the evidence that destroys the entire claims of this fraudulent trial. It’s not every day that a fraud trial is itself a fraud, but that’s what we have here with this trial, run by another Soros-sponsored seditionist DA, Leticia James, who knows full well the Judge will give here EVERYTHING she wants, and more, without need for evidence or a fair trial, which would prevent him from ruling as he has so far.

The judge has seen the document and somehow ruled it was inadmissible, so this is Trump’s efforts to enter into the trial record that the Judge clearly knows about the exculpatory evidence and unconstitutionally dismissed it, even claiming it puts more onus on the defense to make accurate claims about the value of his property, which it clearly does not.

Let us remember this judge decided he was an expert in property valuation, and so he already found Trump guilty without a trial, claiming he knew the valuations of property were dead wrong, obviously. This is double-speak for “this has to be wrong in order for me to execute my petty power to destroy dissent to the anti-American party, the god I serve, sedition.”

The document Trump wanted to include shows no one was giving him loans based on his valuation claims. The document was titled “Disclaimers Provided to Banks in Each Financial Statement.” It states “…considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop the related estimates of current value,” a considerable judgment that was not adhered to by this judge, who, without any experience in such matters, decided he could discern the valuations were wrong based on his simple ‘eye test.’

The document also adds this, “Users of this financial statement should recognize that they might reach different conclusions about the financial conditions of Donald J. Trump.”

The trial is over, it should have never happened. The tactics by the DNC-CCP to destroy a man you might not like are being codified into our courts even as we speak, and if the treatment of Donald J. Trump does not upset you, if you don’t recognize the threat to your person by the court’s open violation of constitutional law because you fear the monster the DNC-CCP’s content marketing machine, the MSM, mostly created, then you are a fool who will soon be parted from whatever gold you imagine you will receive by supporting the party of hate, fear, and fake hope, the party that dared to imagine it could defy God himself.

Progmerican President Defends Students’ Right to Free Speech When They Say Leftist Things

The White House has come out to defend the rights of Americans to express dissent against the Israeli state and support for the Palestinians and/or Hamas. Some of these Americans even support the acts of terror committed by Hamas, justifying it with claims that Israel does the same. Having such a reprehensible position as defending true terror is still an American right and one this writer supports, but seeing the White House defend the right to free speech while it supports corporate economic executions of Americans who dare dissent against their policies, such as abortion and the “normalization” (which is a dog whistle for “forced preference and acceptance”) of homosexuality, makes their latest appeal to free-speech rights ring hollow.

Still, this writer echoes the sentiment of White House press Secretary Harine Jeane-Pierre when she said in support of Americans’ rights to express reprehensible views (not that supporting the Palestinians is reprehensible, it’s supporting Hamas that’s reprehensible), “I would just tell you that you don’t have to agree with every sentiment that is expressed in a country like this to stand by the First Amendment and the idea of peaceful protest…We’re always going to denounce antisemitism, but at the same time people have the right to peacefully protest.”

She’s conveniently American when its power can be used to support her side, but decidedly not when it comes to the rights of Americans to dissent against abortion or “gay rights” (which, again, aren’t “rights,” they are privileges, to create a class of people about which nothing “bad” can be said about them publicly without market or even state coercive powers being brought to bear to silence that dissent). It’s ok to hate the Jews publicly, but not the “people of color” or the LGBTQplusplusplus crowd.

Yet, this writer still supports the right of even Progmericans to voice dissent and to “peacefully,” not violently (as is more often the case when it comes to progmericans, who view true Americanism as a dog whistle for their boogeyman of all boogeymen that give them their “right” to murder their neighbors, white supremacism). Cancelling people from the market or from higher institutions of learning for having reprehensible views is very rarely representative of the American Rule of Law spirit.

It’s nice to see the Biden administration visiting American when it works in their favor. It would be even nicer if they stayed, but then they’d have to live with the consequences of action even if it doesn’t empower them to re-imagine America into the progmerican dream, where liberty dies in the name of “protecting the disenfranchised” as defined by the elite few who fund the vast majority of the machine the progmericans have built to destroy America from within.

“Book Ban” is a Dog Whistle for Nonce Advocacy

A Colorado Springs School District Library contains books that “teach” children to find adults to have sex with. Parents want these books removed. Meanwhile, the far left’s “book ban” narrative continues as they pressure Scholastic Books to not remove sexually explicit content targeting kids from their catalogue.

One book that parents wants removed is called “This Book is Gay,” by Juno Dawson. One part of the book has this passage:

“How Sex Apps Work:

  1. Upload a tiny pic of yourself to the app.
  2. The app works out your location.
  3. The app tells you who the nearest homosexuals are.
  4. You then chat to them.
  5. Because you are near, it is easy to meet up with them.”

The book also gives gay men a sales pitch to kids, saying “Gay men have slightly longer and thicker (redacted). Excellent. The amygdala of gay men is more responsive to porn… So, we have bigger (redacted) and are hornier. Jus’ sayin’.”

Dawson also gives kids advice on how to hook up for sex with adults, telling them “to do a sex meet” by “meet(ing) the trick in a public place for a drink first. That way you can assess if you fancy them in the flesh/they are not a twitchy eyes freakazoid before letting them into your house.”

This is just one example of the types of books parents want removed from children’s public school libraries. It is not a ban on that book anymore than criminalizing exposing children to pornography is a ban on pornography. It’s a form of censorship that, if you oppose it you should probably be investigated, and you definitely shouldn’t be around kids.

This is the type of behavior the far left (which is the DNC-CCP at this point, for they are now one and the same) is advocating for every time they carry a headline like one far left publication writes on an almost daily basis.

Scholastic tries to defend caving to book banning after one of its authors blasts the policy – www.dailykos.com

This website, its owners, and the author of this article should all be considered suspects in child sex assault crimes for perpetuating this hateful narrative in the first place, attempting to condition Americans to equate preventing children from being exposed to sexually explicit material that validates pornography with some form of first amendment right. This same website, and all the websites like it, also perpetuate the doctrine of criminalizing “hate speech,” also advocate destroying the economic lives of Americans who dare speak publicly against murdering unborn children.

This publication, and all the far left websites like it, is advocating for child rape every time it pushes the “book ban” narrative.

New York Wants to License 3D Printers

In a move that could set a precedent leading to government licensing for 3D printers, the far-left blue state of New York has a bill in its legislature called AB A8132 that would require its citizens to go through a criminal background check before they can purchase a 3D printer t0 ostensibly protect citizens from criminals being able to make “ghost guns,” which is just a far-left anti-American term for homemade guns, the heart of resistance to tyranny the world over.

The author of the bill, Jenifer Rakjumar, said of the bill “Three-dimensionally printed firearms, a type of untraceable ghost gun, can be built by anyone using a $150 three-dimensional printer. This bill will require a background check so that three-dimensional printed firearms do not get in the wrong hands.”

As the Supreme Court has recently decided to unconstitutionally allow the enforcement of a ban on homemade guns by the Biden regime, this bill is aligned with that un-American narrative perpetuated by the media organizations that find themselves mere vassals of the corpostate machine the DNC-CCP relies on to consolidate and preserve its anti-American power in these American lands.

The bill would lay the groundwork to create a registry of Americans living in this fallen state who possessed 3D printers capable of manufacturing homemade firearms, the symbol of American liberty itself for those of us paying attention to “current year” politicking.

The bill is allegedly targeting only 3D printers that can make homemade guns, derisively referred to as “ghost guns,” intending to illogically stigmatize the mind against this act of self-stewardship, liberty, that the powers that be, including the reporters who write about such bills, are violently against. But the bill fails to specify 3D printer models, as if it could since new 3D printers can be created after the bill becomes law, and even more, 3D printers themselves can be “Ghost 3D Printers,” that is, 3D printers created by individuals in their own homes.

The bill is also designed, this writer theorizes, to lay the groundwork for the ultimate prohibition against 3D printers in general, as they represent as much of a threat to the controlling of the means of human production as the printing press was (and still is) to the authoritarians that seek to control outcomes to make them the de facto gods of humanity, making humans in their own anti-Christ, anti-liberty image, which is the entire story of history throughout all humanity as readily observed in God’s scriptures.

The printing press in most kingdoms required a license to be owned and a license to publish. The state sought to control the flow of information. Now, the state needs to control more than information, it needs to control the means of production to assure that the large-scale systems it depends on for power, such as our near-monopolistic institutions, for they produce most all of our product needs, making them a concentrated, easy-to-access, predictably reliable sources of tax revenue and political campaign financing, as well as funding cultural production through the newspapers and movie studios they also control.

In 14th Century England, the Miller, the person who ground your grains to flour, was such an institution. When portable mills become more reliable, the state had to lock that down to protect its monopolistic control, through the Miller, of essential production the citizens relied on. This is why 14th Century England required its citizens to have a license to even own a portable mill, and strict laws regarding how that mill could be used (for limited family needs alone).

The 3D printer is the greatest threat to the state’s hold on information and production in all of human history up to this point, so the state has just recently figured this out and now the far-left blue state of New York is beginning the process of nudging Americans towards an acceptance of having that small-scale empowering technology locked behind government guns and missiles aimed at the rebel who would dare print what they want in defiance of a state that seeks to make humans in its own corrupt image rather than facilitating the self-stewardship potential of humans that live in the lands it controls.

For a better understanding of our standards of news reporting, read our report “The Prophetic Voice in News?”

ACT Test Scores Show “Woke” Public Schools Failing Students

With the conversion of American public schools from preparatory training for living as free Americans to being trained to be anti-American revolutionaries, it should be no surprise that the public school system is producing children failing to cut the grade. The latest evidence comes from this year’s ACT college admission test scores, which have plummeted to a 30-year low.

For the last six years, ACT scores have been falling, now it’s reached a 30-year low of 19.5 out of 36, a 54% score. The numbers will continue to go down as the students who have experienced the political anti-American activist version of education for more grade years make their way to the stage of taking an ACT test. The spreading of what this writer calls Woketarian indoctrination by the state has really only exploded nationally within the last 6 years, therefore many students experienced some years of more preparatory training for living as free American adults.

As the years go on, less and less students would have had school years free from the burden of being taught to hate themselves, their parents, and their country. Less and less students will know anything other than racial, sexual, and gender divisions created by their own teachers, who themselves are becoming increasingly fully indoctrinated anti-American revolutionaries willing to toss the Bill of Rights in the name of “protecting” gay people from people who disagree with their lifestyle choices.

This writer said to anyone who cared to listen more than 6 years ago that an ideology based in the underlying assumption that white people invented evil and therefore we must eliminate white people and everything they (allegedly) invented (like Christianity and the American republic) will produce trauma, division, hate, wars in our classrooms if it’s brought into our public schools.

This is exactly what is happening as this writer has experienced anecdotal evidence of the trauma being produced even in my local schools, as testified to me through children connected to me through my daughter (who was homeschooled just as this woketarian garbage started to be introduced to our local schools), relatives, and friends who have children.

In our local high school, kids have told me that everyone is constantly either trying to prove they’re not one of the ists or phobes or trying to accuse others of ists and phobes. The passive-aggressive among them are the most aggressive in using accusations of ist and phobe to destroy children they don’t like or are competing against.

All of this was predictable from the start and could be predicted by anyone who has ever heard of the Wave Experiment.

From knowledgenuts.com:

In 1967, a high school history class in California became the lab rats of an experiment to study the rise of Nazism. Their teacher called the group “The Third Wave,” even going so far as to punish an improper sitting posture. Within days, they had a motto, flag, salute, and began to view themselves as an exclusive, elite group. The experiment was killed by the fifth day, as the students were beginning to spiral out of control and becoming aggressive…

In 1967, Ron Jones was teaching his class about what life was like in Germany leading up to World War II. When one student asked how so many people could blindly obey such a regime, he decided that a demonstration would be the best answer. He implemented a mandatory pose for students at their desk: sitting up straight, hands flat on the desk, feet flat on the ground, parallel to one another, knees at right angles, and more. The class would do drills and have to be sitting correctly within five seconds. He then wanted to see how far he could take the experiment. Students were required to stand to the side of their desk and begin with “Mr. Jones” each time they addressed him. Answers to questions were to be a maximum of three words. At first the class improved, but then things went too far.

On Day Two, they gave themselves a motto: “Strength Through Discipline. Strength Through Community.” The class was brought up to the front in pairs to chant the phrase until everyone was involved. Then Jones developed their salute: The right hand was cupped and brought up to almost touch the right shoulder. This was the titular “Third Wave,” meant to represent how the final wave in a trio is the strongest, although its similarity to “The Third Reich” can’t be ignored. Students were ordered to, and did, give the salute anytime they saw one another, even outside of class. The next day, membership was made optional, and everyone opted to stay. In fact, 13 students cut class to join the original 30, and membership cards were then issued. Three students were selected to police the rest, and everyone was encouraged to ensure that all members of the Third Wave were complying with the growing number of rules at all times. They were also instructed to prevent outsiders from entering the room. For an outsider to join, they had to be recommended by a member and swear allegiance to the Third Wave. This led to bullying. Members used threats to recruit some students, and exclude others. They also began ratting each other out for not following the rules. One well-built student became the teacher’s personal bodyguard. Other teachers began to get frustrated, as an additional 50 members of the Third Wave meant that students were skipping their assigned classes. Parents were also starting to get worried, and one father (who had been a prisoner of war in Germany) broke in and destroyed the room.

Perhaps it is time for parents to follow the example of the father at the end of this story. Perhaps they already would have if they fully understood the danger of teaching children that classes of people are evil for merely being born while others are preferred.

More than just grades are going down, well-being is going down as well as more and more children find themselves psychologically traumatized by the terror inflicted on them by teachers who draw their salaries from coerced taxes on the parents these teachers hate as much as they hate our country and “heteronormativity.”

This is flat-out child abuse, and it will produce violent, bitter adults not prepared to become free American adults. As a matter of fact, they won’t even know what freedom is, it will be, to them, a dog whistle for white supremacism to even say such a “dirty” word, which is the whole point of terrorizing our children in the first place, to kill the American spirit and replace it with angry, manipulable adults willing to kill their neighbors for simply being born as the wrong “class” of people.

X Won’t Censor Election Content For “Misinformation,” and the Seditionist Left is NOT Happy

Elon Musk has announced the dismantling of his “Election Integrity” team as the 2024 election approaches. He announced the plan in a tweet on September 27, where he said “Oh you mean the “Election Integrity” Team that was undermining election integrity? Yeah, they’re gone.”

That same election integrity team for the U.S. was apparently located in Dublin, Ireland, meaning the primary public speech platform in the U.S. would allegedly be governed for “election integrity” by foreigners.

Twitter created a blog post on August of 2023 that outlines the type of tweets that could be flagged and made it as clear as words can make it that “misinformation” will not cause your account and/or tweet to be flagged UNLESS it involves information that could lead someone to vote in the wrong place or on the wrong day.

The DNC-CCP media is apoplectic about this move, equating it to fascism, claiming that any public speech platform that doesn’t screen “misinformation” from its platform is aiding and abetting white supremacists or “right wingers.”

The true face of the DNC-CCP, the Communist Party USA, posted this lament at Musk’s refusal to censor what they deem to be “hate speech”: Elon Musk and the fight to X out hate speech – Communist Party USA – cpusa.org

The left worldwide laments the lack of censorship of content that is deemed “misinformation”:
EU data on X shows Elon Musk is king of disinformation, must obey law – www.houstonchronicle.com

EU Officials Condemn X (Formerly Twitter) as Major Source of Fake News – gizmochina – www.gizmochina.com

The EU may have some success getting tech firms to tackle fake news – but good luck with Elon Musk | X (formerly known as Twitter) – amp.theguardian.com

In the case of a Europe that lacks the constitutional framework America uniquely has, it’s against the law to publish “misinformation” or “hate speech,” a reality the DNC-CCP hopes to create in the land of the free (thus another reason this writer calls them the party of sedition).

The American left went apoplectic at the news of the firing of the Election Dis-Integrity team:

X Accused Of Weakening Measures Against Election Misinformation – www.forbes.com

Concerns Mount Over Social Media and 2024 Elections – techpolicy.press

To the left, “misinformation” and “hate speech” are really just code words for “content that does not parrot our worldview.” You can see that here in a post that bemoans anyone speaking out against child grooming in schools, or countering the lie that that there are more than two genders, even if the ones doing it are in one of their “protected” (code for “elite special class”) groups:

Instagram has allowed Gays Against Groomers to spread harmful rhetoric about LGBTQ people – www.mediamatters.org

Leftists in America know full well that the boardrooms of our major institutions are all infested with anti-American seditionists like themselves, seditionists who call good evil and evil good, seditionists who say anti-American things like “freedom of speech doesn’t mean freedom from consequences,” with the consequences being getting punched, stabbed, murdered, economically destroyed,  and culturally  and economically ostracized.

They know full well their faction has near-total control over the means of social and cultural production, that all the major media outlets are controlled by a handful of billionaires who put the interests of the “world” over the interests of the American republic, making the Americans in that group seditionists at heart. Remember, “world” is a code word for Socialist Dystopia, a very specific world that celebrates murdering unborn children, sexual activity that leads to no birth, depopulation, and total control over the lives of the non-billionaires.

The left supports censorship of “hate speech” and “misinformation” because they are cowards who understand deep down that their ideas are hateful to the human species as a whole, that their policies lead to genocide and corruption from top to bottom, that they create a climate of fear and hate where psychopaths are rewarded with power and compassion and mercy are murdered in the public square.

Misinformation and hate speech are terms that are defined by the faction in power, and the left knows and relies on this fact.

If they were the weak faction, the faction that couldn’t rely on billionaires to use their significant privilege to execute the enemies of their faction (as America’s billionaires have overwhelmingly chosen to do for the DNC-CCP faction), they would be crying out like leftists did in the 1970s and 80s, for free speech rights. They would be crying out for the right to dissent instead of supporting locking people up that dare express dissent at leftist policies.

The reaction of the left to news that Elon Musk would not allow his platform to censor content based on “misinformation” and  hate speech” as the standard shows how anti-American and seditious they are at heart. A coward who knows he is lying is the only one that needs to protect himself from “misinformation” or “hate speech,” two terms that have been used in some form or another by dictators since dictators existed.

Americans who continue to believe the Democratic Party is anything but a revolutionary machine of terror aimed at the heart of our republic will be the death of this republic. And when the cattle cars are moving on the leftist rails, be they literal or symbolic, these same Americans that continue to deny reality will be targets to be placed on those cattle cars as surely we will be. The death of America is assured so long as the DNC-CCP is allowed to operate outside of American law, unaccountable for the terror they inflict on our republic and our citizens. The proof that the GOP is opposition  control and nothing more lies in the fact that GOP-controlled states are not rightly criminally prosecuting the DNC-CCP for its acts of violence, acts of sedition against the American republic.

For a better understanding of our standards of news reporting, read our report “The Prophetic Voice in News?”

For in-depth reporting on today’s news, consider supporting the Freedomist by subscribing to receive our monthly newsletter, FIA Monthly (formerly McAlvany Intelligence Advisor). Subscribe here.

CIA’s New AI Tool Can Now Bring Americans Under One Digital Thumb

The Central Intelligence Agency, the same agency that paid researchers to alter their data to protect the CCP during the Coronavirus pandemic, now wants to expand its power to surveil Americans using an AI tool similar to ChatGPT that will comb the internet from stem to stern seeking private information about anyone and everyone, including Americans, it can put into its databases.

Randy Nixon, director of the CIA’s Open-Source Enterprise Division said, in an interview with Bloomberg, “We’ve gone from newspapers and radio to newspapers and television, to newspapers and cable television, to basic internet, to big data, and it keeps going.”

This AI tool is big data, and it’s intended to, according to Nixon “find the needs in in the needle field.” In other words, they want to be able to have any information then need on anyone, at any time, ostensibly to find the guilty but just as easily to find the dissidents. As a matter of fact, this writer assumes the tool is intended far more to police us than to protect us.

The most troubling part of this tool is that it not only gathers data, like ChatGPT, it produces content from that data off of user inquiry. Nixon made that clear when he said of the tool “Then you can it to the next level and start chatting and asking questions of the machines to give you answers, as sourced.” That query might be, “Who owns guns in this neighborhood and what are the best times to catch them off-guard?” Or it might be “Who are the homophobes in this community and where do they live?”

From Bloomberg:

It’s part of a broader government campaign to harness the power of AI and compete with China, which is seeking to become the global leader in the field by 2030. That US push dovetails with the intelligence community’s struggle to process the vast amounts of data that’s now publicly available, amid criticism that it’s been slow to exploit that source.

The CIA’s AI tool will allow users to see the original source of the information that they’re viewing, Nixon said. He said that a chat feature is a logical part of getting intelligence distributed quicker…

“Our collection can just continue to grow and grow with no limitations other than how much things cost.” (said Nixon)

Main

Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!

Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here