Xi Warns of Military Struggle While Warning American Corpos Against Decoupling

Freedomist Editor August 2, 2021

PGC – While the Chinese President, Chairman Xi, continues to build his military, just recently, the Chinese were able to host a meeting of the biggest American international corporations we have to assure them, and to preach to them, that decoupling from China is bad. They’re even dangling before these American companies the prize so many have been after, the open Chinese market.

The potential to make money in the Chinese market could be three to four times the capacity of America’s market in a short order, and this, in part, is what American corporations are banking on, and why they seem to be so integrated with China, with our own professional basketball league choosing China over Hong Kong in a Twitter war.

This is become their City of Gold they’ve been pursuing for sometime, a pursuit that was JUST ABOUT to bring big fruit until the Donald came along and wrecked their marriage in the middle of the dress rehearsal. Well, they can’t exactly get to that point just yet, but they’re working to get back to that point.

While these corporations prepare to become even more dependent on a nation-state that is currently genociding a whole ethnic group, they pretend moral supremacism through corpowoketarianizm at home, destroying the lives of innocents caught up in the latest moral hysteria to sweep across a land (wasn’t the first, won’t be the last).

And while our corporations, from near-stem, to near-stern, prepare the wedding bed with daggers under the mattress (knowing the bride has knives under there as well), that same courted bride is building a military behind an imperialistic mindest as reflected in Chairman Xi himself, who, under Xi thoughts, has described the role of China as serving as the Father of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics to the rest of the world that, through soft power mostly, will acceede to the Chinese Way of doing Marx, so to speak.

Not that he’s anywhere close to Marx or Chinese or even Characteristics for that matter in what his system currently represents, a mix of near lawlessness with brutal thought-police level of control. You can pee on the streets or randomly set up a space on a sidewalk and sell stuff, but don’t go on social media and watch anything inappropriate as defined by the CCP, or say anything inappropriate as defined by the CCP, else Uncle will show up and take you to a dark place, where you will be contained in a special chair to assure your movement was limited, and you would be questioned about that social media post or view or like until they were convinced you were contrite or duly chastized, then they would let you go.

The Chinese state has mastered corpowoketariansim beyond anything the corporations of America could hope to achieve anytime soon.

This is the CCP we are giving a pass to as she builds more power and makes it clear her intentions to not be a passive superpower, but to be one that consumes nations with her way. Come what may, you don’t want such an outcome for your children, yet our holy holy corpowoketarian companies seem to want that for your children, for they make bank at the top while we lose what liberties we have remaining.

Chairman Xi himself is either relying on martial inspiration for a boost in the hearts of a nation that is being wrecked with floods, broken dams, and incompentent state handling of crisis, or he is wary of America’s, and other nations’ continued patience with China once their populace figures out just how long and how deep the continued sacrifice of local liberty for Chinese dollar is among their biggest and most well-known and well-loved brands, and even their own governments as well (most certainly ours).

He is urging his military to make preparations for military struggle, which might be inocuous enough given his current geopolitical circumstance, but this seems, to me, to fit more in the pattern he and his foreign ministers have been following for some time.

If you will recall, it was a foreign minister representing Chairman Xi that warned America if it continued to say the Coronavirus came from China that they might withhold our medicine (why our corporations and our government would put 90 percent of our medical anythings in China is a question that will one day have to be asked) for treatment of the virus.

In that spirit, this comment is less inocuous to me, though I think it portends a still more gradual escalation that the nation-state has continued to be on for the last 4 years since Chairman Xi become the effective new Mao of the Chinese State.

Xi Jinping Calls on China to ‘Make Preparations for Military Struggle’

From legalinsurrection.com
2021-08-01 14:00:25
Vijeta Uniyal
Excerpt:

Chinese President Xi Jinping has urged the country to prepare for a military conflict. The Chinese leader demanded more power and resources for the country’s armed forces, the People Liberation Army (PLA).

The PLA “must be placed in a more important position, and the consolidation of national defence and a strong military must be accelerated.” the Communist dictator declared on Friday. “We must persist in strengthening the overall planning of war and make preparations for military struggle,” he added.

Friday’s statement comes amid series of threatening remarks aimed at the United States and the West made by the Chinese leader since President Joe Biden took over the White House.

In early July, Xi threatened that China’s adversaries will “have their heads cracked and bleeding” in any future confrontation. They “will find themselves on a collision course with a great wall of steel forged by over 1.4 billion Chinese people,” he warned in a televised speech marking the 100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party.

The Hong Kong-based newspaper South China Morning Post reported the Chinese leader’s comments:

Chinese President Xi Jinping has called for a greater focus on national defence and the military in a speech given on the eve of an important military anniversary and as the nation faces a growing range of security risks.

After giving a spirited speech on the achievements of China’s Communist Party during its centennial celebrations earlier this month, Xi said on Friday: “On the path of completely building a modern socialist country and realising the second centennial goal, national defence and the military must be placed in a more important position, and the consolidation of national defence and a strong military must be accelerated.

Read Full Article

Why Did A Sailor Burn Down The USS Bonhomme Richard?

Bill Collier August 1, 2021

The dramatic fire that destroyed the USS Bonhomme Richard was, according to the Navy, allegedly started by a sailor. While the sailor’s idenity has not been revealed, and formal court martial has yet to be announced, it appears this was an act of sabotage. Moreover, their is evidenced of 3 different fires on theee different vessels in San Diego over a 15 month period prior to this major fire.

“The sailor was a member of Bonhomme Richard’s crew at the time and is accused of starting the fire,” Cmdr. Sean Robertson, a U.S. 3rd Fleet spokesperson in San Diego, said in a statement.

The charges “were brought forth against a Navy sailor in response to evidence found during the criminal investigation into the fire started on USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) on July 12, 2020.” The charges against the seaman apprentice are aggravated arson under Article 126 of the Unifrom Code of Military Justice and hazarding a vessel under Article 110.

“Evidence collected during the investigation is sufficient to direct a preliminary hearing in accordance with due process under the military justice system,” Robertson said.

“Vice Adm. Steve Koehler, who commands 3rd Fleet, is considering court-martial charges and has directed a preliminary hearing at which an impartial hearing officer will make determinations and recommendations required by the UCMJ prior to any further trial proceedings – including whether or not there is probable cause to believe an offense has been committed and to offer a recommendation as to the disposition of the case.”

The sailor, a Seaman Apprentice, had been held in custody at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif., before being released in November. At this time they are not in custody.

Pictured above- Federal firefighters assess damage in the hangar bay aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD-6) on July 15, 2020. US Navy Photo

What could some of the motives be? Some possibilities include a sailor disgruntled by the stress of being 2 years in dry dock and facing a deployment, a stressful scenario for many sailors. It could also be more ideological, ranging from right to leftwing radicalism, or even anger over the Navy’s constant and distracting “diversity training” which is clearly ideological brainwashing rather than useful instruction.

One possibility is that the Navy has a simmering problem with morale. We have already seen reports that morale is low, largely effected by the obsession of the command with convincing sailord to “bow to the rainbow” rather than focusing on combat readiness. The ability of sailors today to fight their ships is decidedly decreased over what it was 20 years ago.

This could either cause an angry reaction that, well not at all justified, is somewhat predictable. In that case, if indeed the sailor was disgruntled about the rainbow fascist indoctrination, the likely results could range from cover-up to conceal the problem to exploitation of the crime to double-down on the rainbow fascist indoctrination.

In the event the crime was motivated by leftwing or Islamist ideology, the true nature will be concealed with a focus on the sailor’s mental health.

The outstanding question is whether the Navy, in part through its obsession with ideological indoctrination, is brewing a massive morale problem that could lead to such acts of sabotage. This could either be a result of sailors’ trained to essentially hate their own country may be radicalized or because angry sailors rejecting ideological indoctrination lash out by committing crimes like this.

The opacity of the process by which this has been investigated and the fact the identity of the sailor is concealed and formal charges (as in a court martial) not brought, leads one to believe the actual circumstances and motive surrounding this incident are not useful to the Navy brass’s narrative.