Military

PGC – The Mexican government is using the same tactics as the anti-gun activists in America in going after the heart and soul of gun manufacturers, its operating cost.  It does this by costing the gun manufacturers millions in legal liabilities and help lay other groundwork for financial institutions to once again use their monopolized market powers to cut gun manufacturers out of the financial exchange system altogether.

Even if they lose the lawsuit, the gun manufacturers lose.  If they can’t pass laws preventing us from owning and possessing the means to self-defense of the times, then they will destroy the instutions that create our self-defense tools for us.

If the US Courts let this go on, more nation-states aligned with the anti-gun coalition will bring suit as well, destroying our gun manufacturing companies once and for all, the desired aim of all the nation-states in the authoritarian club.

The Mexican government filed a lawsuit Wednesday, August 4th, against eleven of the biggest gun manufacturers in the United States claiming the same type of justification for monetary recompense as the Sandy Hook Anti-Gun Group is using in its American suit against the manufacturer of the gun used in the Sandy Hook tragic mass shooting.

The Mexican government was careful not to appear to be targeting US law,  a tactic born over the DNC’s inability to pass any meaningful national anti-gun laws.  Again, if we can’t legalize it away, we’ll bankrupt it away.  This careful wording gives evidence to that supposition, “This flood is not a natural phenomenon or an inevitable consequence of the gun business or of U.S. gun laws. It is the foreseeable result of the Defendants’ deliberate actions and business practices.”

Their business practices are in advertising guns as effective self-defense tools and emphasizing their power.

I can see to the authoritarian in non-American lands how literally frightening it might seem to live in a land that embraces the free ownership and possession of firearms, a key symbol of trust between the people and the state that no other nation in this land in current year can hope to appreciate, let alone understand.

This is a narrative that is easy for the Mexican authoritarian (there are plenty of non-authoritarian Mexicans who dream of living in a land where firearms are freely held by the people) to enter into, as this authoritarian is long in the tooth in statewide gun control execution.

The quote here, though, specifically, attemptsn to decouple the lawsuit from the 2nd Amendment.  It attempts to make it a non-second-amendment-rights issue, but, at its core, it cannot help but be such a thing, for, should the suit succeed, the end of gun manufacturing in America means the effective end of the second amendment.

If the people cannot hold the current year means of self-defense, then they will soon be without ownership of anything.  All that they hold will be rentals.  Maybe the very air you breathe will be metered for taxation purposes.

Still, a foreign power taking advantage of a competing power’s own rules to shake it from within, well, from that perspective this move also makes perfect sense.  This is not to suggest Mexico wishes to see America destroyed, only that she wishes to see her less powerful to give her advantage at the trade table.  I wouldn’t fault Mexico in the least if my suspicions were true.

This is what nation-states do.

What troubles me is that the keys to this potential vulnerability of US Sovereignty was created by the anti-gun movement, who may very well wish to do far more harm than even Mexico would wish to see done.  A weak United States means the removal of a long buffer of relative security.    I doubt very much the powers that be that are Mexico would wish to lose that security at this moment in their history.

Their military capacity is less than world-class.  This is what Mexico most likely will be focusing on next.  For that, it needs a favorable trade deal  with the US first and foremost, a strong US, giving Mexico time to develop her military to be able to stand on her own.

The wildcard in this whole affair comes in the form of other nation-states that might see an opportunity to offer Mexico gold in trade as well, specifically China and Russia, but not exclusively so.

The real ‘vilain’ in this whole affair is one of many DNC-serving narratives that are undoing the fundamental fabric of an American democratic republic bounded by the Bill of Rights.  This is the unity that makes our diversity possible.  Remove that, and you remove the ties that bind, and factions will form that your deep learning models can’t predict.

The machines don’t know us, yet.

News Source