Three weeks after his administration launched a drone attack that killed 10 civilians in Kabul, Afghanistan, President Joe Biden addressed the United Nations General Assembly. He proudly declared, “I stand here today, for the first time in 20 years, with the United States not at war.” The day before, his administration had launched a drone strike in Syria, and three weeks earlier, the U.S. had conducted an air strike in Somalia. The commander-in-chief also apparently forgot that U.S. forces are still fighting in at least six different countries, including Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Libya, Somalia and Niger. And he promised to continue bombing Afghanistan from afar.
Unfortunately Biden’s withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan is substantially less meaningful when analyzed in light of his administration’s pledge to mount “over-the-horizon” attacks in that country from afar even though we won’t have troops on the ground.
“Our troops are not coming home. We need to be honest about that,” Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-New Jersey) said during congressional testimony by Secretary of State Antony Blinken earlier this month. “They are merely moving to other bases in the same region to conduct the same counterterrorism missions, including in Afghanistan.”
While America consumes itself from within on the assumption that evil was inventeed by America and America was invented by white males (or something to that effect), her opponents are continuing to work on ways to reduce America’s power abroad and at home. China is the most powerful of these opponents, and is the one that US Air Force Secretary Frank Kendell was focusing on when speaking to reporters about China’s continued accelerated expansion of their nuclear aresenall.
Kendall said, “If they continue down the path that they seem to be on—to substantially increase their ICBM force—they will have a de facto first-strike capability.
For the people in the back that might not understand, he’s saying China might soon have a nuclear advantage over America that could allow it to strike before we we could respond. For the people leading the suicidal charge from within America, the DNC and its ‘allies,’ that means our lives are all at risk of significant reduction of the quality of life if China ever gets to a position of power dominance over the United States. If you think we white Americans invented evil, as many of you do, especially in the DNC coalition of American self-haters, wait til you get a load of the super boss that could replace America, China.
If you’re really against fascism, DNC coalition, then stop destroying America from within at the benefit of the biggest fascistic threat in the world today, China. So long as you continue to destroy American power while ignoring Chinese power, no American should consider you an American at all, or, even, a safe neighbor to live next to, for if the Chinese ever did land on our shores (something they hardly need do given how many Americans work for them already), your neighbor would consider you more of a threat to them than any Chinese soldier that would ever find themselves stationed here.
Whatever America is, whatever sins we have committed, what the state of Xi represents, has representeed, in the 20th and 21st centuries is considerably more human dignity and diversity denying than anything America has ever committed on any scale throughout any part of her history, and the DNC wants you to believe that no one has ever been evil before white men invented America or will be after we rid the world of this white supremecist demon. If you believe them, you’re not fighting fascists, you’re enabling them.
China could be heading for a first-strike nuclear capability, the U.S. Air Force secretary said Monday, urging the United States to accelerate its own weapons development to keep pace with Beijing.
“If they continue down the path that they seem to be on—to substantially increase their ICBM force—they will have a de facto first-strike capability,” Frank Kendall told reporters at the Air Force Association’s annual conference outside Washington, D.C.
But independent nuclear-policy experts noted that even China’s decades-old ICBMs could be “a first-strike weapon,” and challenged Air Force officials to produce evidence that Beijing actually intends to change its “no first use” policy.
In his second major speech since becoming Air Force secretary two months ago, Kendall called out various Chinese weapons developments as reason for concern.
“You’re gonna get tired of hearing me talk about China and the pacing threat that we face,” he said at a press conference a few…
In a show of force and solidarity directed at Russia in support of Ukraine, 15 nations, including the United States, are conducting drills in the Ukraine, with Ukrainian troops, in an operation called Rapid Trident 21.
A multinational military exercise called Rapid Trident 21 has commenced in Ukraine with an opening ceremony at Central City Stadium near the city of Yavoriv.
Around 6,000 troops from 15 nations, including 4,000 soldiers from Ukraine, will participate in this annual training exercise.
The military drill will primarily seek to boost combat readiness, defence capabilities and interoperability among the forces.
GENEVA: The UN human rights chief is calling for a moratorium on the use of artificial intelligence technology that poses a serious risk to human rights, including face-scanning systems that track people in public spaces.
Michelle Bachelet, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, also said Wednesday that countries should expressly ban AI applications which don’t comply with international human rights law.
Applications that should be prohibited include government “social scoring” systems that judge people based on their behavior and certain AI-based tools that categorize people into clusters such as by ethnicity or gender.
AI-based technologies can be a force for good but they can also “have negative, even catastrophic, effects if they are used without sufficient regard to how they affect people’s human rights,” Bachelet said in a statement.
Her comments came along with a new UN report that examines how countries and businesses have rushed into applying AI systems that affect people’s lives and livelihoods without setting up proper safeguards to prevent discrimination and other harms.
“This is not about not having AI,” Peggy Hicks, the rights office’s director of thematic engagement, told journalists as she presented the report in Geneva. “It’s about recognizing that if AI is going to be used in these human rights — very critical — function areas, that it’s got to be done the right way. And we simply haven’t yet put in place a framework that ensures that happens.”
Bachelet didn’t call for an outright ban of facial recognition technology, but said governments should halt the scanning of people’s features in real time until they can show the technology is accurate, won’t discriminate and meets certain privacy and data protection standards.
While countries weren’t mentioned by name in the report, China has been among the countries that have rolled out facial recognition technology — particularly for surveillance in the…
In the near future, in the name of fighting Terrorism, America could find herself working as an ally with the Taliban on some operations that target the type of Islamo-Fascist groups that this particular Islamo-Fascist group might not like. This isn’t a speculation, this is something offered as a possibility by none other than General Milley himself, the current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
…. Should the United States cooperate with the Taliban in order to counter the Islamic State in Afghanistan? When asked about prospects for that during a Sept. 1 press conference, Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, responded, “It’s possible.” Given the 20-year U.S. war against the Taliban, Milley’s remarks made news and came as a shock to some observers.
In fact, the United States has already worked with the Taliban on several occasions in pursuit of common interests, and Milley’s comment makes clear U.S. officials are seriously thinking through the possibility of doing so again. A review of the pros and cons of future U.S.-Taliban cooperation against the Islamic State in Afghanistan shows that while there may be operational advantages for both sides,
U.S. Army Gen. Mark A. Milley, enemy of the Constitution and traitor to the Bill of Rights, 20th Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, poses for a command portrait in the Army portrait studio at the Pentagon in Arlington, Va., Sept. 26, 2019. (U.S. Army photo by Monica King)
The top brass of the Pentagon, an institution polluted with corruption and led by vainglorious autonamatons, are rallying around General Milley to justify his clearly irrational behavior. Milley decided that somehow President Trump was going to attack China and betrayed his country by warning the Chinese and “reassuring” them that, whatever Trump did, he and the military were the one who are really in charge.
America’s slavish devotion to its military is shown in a wasteful budget that sees our military overpaying for everything, without any real accountability, a top-down and overly logistical structure that has more non-combatants than warfighters, and a wokatariate agenda that displaces real training for gross social experiments. In short, our military is bloated by inflated prices for equipment and supplies, it is top-heavy and the logistical tail is now wagging the dog, and, finally, its training is dominated by alt-gendered rainbow fascism as opossed to warfighting.
It is upon this heap that the likes of General Milley practice their trade in craft, a craft more devoted to radical ideas about somehow reshaping human nature itself based on fantastical and sci-fi-like theories than protecting and defending the Constitution from all enemies. But beyond the seemingly leftwing nature of the military brass, whose ideology appears as anti-American as any foreign foe we have faced, there beats the rather bipartisan heart of archaic caesarism. The lust for notoriety and ego satisfaction drives these men and women of highest rank to extremes once reserved for immature college activists whose protests were usually aimed at phony crises and bogeyman that were never real.
In short, in scoundrels like Milley and all his fellow top-brass who are defending them, protection is not to the people of this country but, rather, to the rather authoritarian structures they are busy building. Today it almost seems a fifth column have seized the military and are using the alt-gendered rainbow fascism to corrupt the troops and destroy their morale and warfighting capabilities.
But looking on the surface ans blaiming the LGBT community of our fellow Americans for what is happening is missing the point and targeting the wrong people as villains. The present use of this rainbow fascism, where dissent is treason in the eyes of the brass, is but a means to an end, which is not to purge the ranks of anyone who isn’t totally on board with the rainbow, but to remove anyone who takes the enlistment oath seriously. The objective is to build a military who will obey the new class of Caesar wannabes without question, having been programmed to clap like seals at every absurdity crammed down their throat through “diversity training.”
We can predict with certainty that when the rainbow alt-gendered fascism has done its work and trained the troops to accept absurdity without question, the brass and their Caesar will discard these experimental fantasies about changing human sexuality and gender and promptly turn on the very people whose “rights” they once desperately pleaded were so fragile that anyone who deigned to cling to historic orthodoxy and disagree had to be canceled.
One cannot agree with or submit to rainbow fascism and diktat about one’s own thoughts and conscience and seriously adhere to the enlistment oath because all this is a grotesque affront to the Bill of Rights, not to mention America’s historic way of life and heritage. The era of a non-political military who honor the Bill of Rights is being destroyed by the military brass, but not because they in fact desire the rainbow vision they are cramming down the throats of our troops: they are simply using this to destroy the tie between military service and defending the Constitution.
After they succeed, and history warns us that they will succeed, all pretense of being serious about the rights of people to choose who they love and the such will be unnecessary. Some cause or reason will become the new pretext to end the charade, having succeeded in conditioning the troops to defend the brass instead of the Constitution.
Those who fear this alt-gendered rainbow reality where heterosexuality itself may become a pariah in the culture need not fear, this is so absurdly untenable that any society that seriously tries this would face such a dissolution of the social fabric it would quickly collapse, and this is not the goal. The goal is to bring society NEAR collapse, to so break down the social fabric that when the new Caesar comes to “fix” this “decadence”, the vast majority who detest the cancel culture extremism will applaud them even as they turn on the former objects of affection, namely the actual LGBTQ who mostly had nothing to do with the wokatariate nonsense.
In a free and pluralistic society people who desire to experiment with or practice sexuality or gender outside the norms of historic orthodoxy are free, but they can no more impose acceptance or adoption of their ways than anyone else can. Such a society is dynamic and always experimenting, the goal is to seek the ideal without assuming the present achievement is the furthest we can go.
These rainbow warriors for the LGBTQ and etc, an alt-gendered, atomized, and over-sexualized culture, are a fraud. They don’t really care about the rainbow people, they just want to establish legions who will be loyal without question to the brass. And the brass are loyal only to themselves.
The brutal truth is that the American military brass are all Caesarists whose commitment to the Bill of Rights is non-existent.
The Japanese Ministry of Defense’s Joint Staff Office has released footage of what it says were interceptions over neutral waters of Chinese new long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicles that were flying toward its border over the East China Sea. In a series of announcements in August, the Joint Staff of Japan’s Defense Ministry announced that its […]
After 20 years of blood, sweat and tears, from American soldiers and the Afghan people, especially the ones that worked with us to fight the Taliban, our American General of Joint Chiefs of Staff, our top Military person, has recently stated that he expects to have to coordinate with the Taliban to fight terrorism in Afghanistan.
That’s essentially what he said, folks, nevermind the bureaucratic speak, that’s what he said. America.
WASHINGTON: Army General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said on Wednesday that it’s “possible” that the US will have to coordinate with the Taliban on any future counterterrorism strikes in Afghanistan against Islamic State militants or others.
The Taliban, said Milley, is a “ruthless” group, and “whether or not they change remains to be seen.” He added, “In war you do what you must in order to reduce risk to mission and force, not what you necessarily want to do.”
Speaking two days after the final US troops left Afghanistan at the close of a turbulent and deadly evacuation of more than 124,000 American citizens, Afghans and others, Milley and defence secretary Lloyd Austin told Pentagon reporters that it’s hard to predict the future of the Taliban in Afghanistan.
“I would not make any leaps of logic to broader issues,” said Austin.
Both men commanded troops in Afghanistan during the 20-year war and their comments on Wednesday largely focused on tributes to…
In recent months, Washington has had a lot to say about China’s ever-expanding air, naval, and missile power. But when Pentagon officials address the topic, they generally speak less about that country’s current capabilities, which remain vastly inferior to those of the United States, than the world they foresee in the 2030s and 2040s, when Beijing is expected to have acquired far more sophisticated weaponry.
“China has invested heavily in new technologies, with a stated intent to complete the modernization of its forces by 2035 and to field a ‘world-class military’ by 2049,” Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin testified in June. The United States, he assured the Senate Armed Services Committee, continues to possess “the best joint fighting force on Earth.” But only by spending countless additional billions of dollars annually, he added, can this country hope to “outpace” China’s projected advances in the decades to come.
The prospect of a renewed Mutual Defense Cooperation Agreement between Greece and the United States – possibly extended over five years – is an extremely important development, given the challenging geopolitical setting where events both in the immediate vicinity but also in more distant lands that may nevertheless affect us, are creating a growing sense of insecurity.
The US-Greece relationship has acquired its own momentum and, more importantly, is able to progress under different administrations in Washington (and majorities in Congress) and Athens.
Up until a few years ago, American decision makers regarded Greece with some skepticism (the approach was similar in Israel too) because of successive Greek governments’ efforts not to appear too pro-American in the eyes of a public known for decades for its knee-jerk, anti-American reaction and, at best, for marked suspicion of the US. This was due to specific American interventions in Greek domestic affairs in the past, but…
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
