The word Antifa itself is a truncation of anti-fascist. Despite the name, the movement embraces fascistic tactics. … Journalist Lee Stranahan downplays the significance of funding to Antifa. “While it’s been proven that funders like Soros and the Democrat Party have paid protest organizers and some protesters, …
Antifa was first founded in the 1930’s in Germany. … Screenshot of the charity’s website showing their donation of 1500 euros to a Brighton Antifa group. “Antifafunding comes from hedge …
Sep 8, 2020Antifa violence is backed by “powerful political entities” who need to be exposed to stop it, Fox Nation host Lara Logan told “Fox & Friends First” on Tuesday.
Sep 1, 2020Justice Department investigates protest leaders, funding in Portland and other cities. … Asked why leaders of Antifa, a loosely organized extreme far-left ideology, and Black Lives Matter …
In business we must periodically seek the ideal client by assessing all projects for what brings the best returns versus the most investment of time, money, and resource allocation as well as the payment speed and the amount of stresss or aggravation.
We must try to move more and more toward the things that pay up front and/or on time and that are most profitable and least aggravating and stressful. But for all that, we must seek the ideal client until most or all projects are being done with these ideal clients.
When a certain class of clients or types of business tend to be the most unfruitful and burdensome, and also not very profitable, then is the time to begin a shift away from them, even if the profit margin is better.
A profitable project may not necessarily be the greatest profit margin but, rather, the biggest volume and least stress and aggravation. So, a $100,000 project with only $15,000 profit over a 30 day period but which costs include paying staff and/or contractors to do almost all the work is more profitable than a $45,000 project with $15,000 profit over 6 months that requires you to do more than, say, 30% of the work and which is more stressful and aggravating.
I have found that lower end clients do not understand marketing near as much as higher end clients, which often means the lower end client wants more direct attributable results than can be calculated and cannot see an uptick in overall business or donors or whatever as being fed by your efforts. This is especially true when that client uses diverse channels and means.
I should add, in my own experience the failure to set expectations can be mine, but that’s not always the case as some clients hear what they want to hear and discard what they don’t want to hear.
As an example, an ad campaign to get online sign-ups will necessarily impact other channels, such as emails or phone calls and even foot traffic. The sophisticated client knows this, but the less sophisticated does not equate anything to your credit outside of a trackable outcome, not understanding how various forms of marketing leverage each other.
As an example, the web form your digital marketing may have led to being filled out was likely assisted by a TV or radio ad. In this case, the client’s customers may prefer anonymous online forms to a phone call where they will feel pressured. The reverse can be true also: the client’s customers may prefer a personal touch and don’t want to submit information in a web form, so they may see digital ads urging them to fill out an online form but still call the client instead.
There are many examples.
I use marketing because it’s what I do.
You have to consider who your ideal client is: the most overall profit (even if a lower profit margin), the least stress and aggravation, and you as an owner/principal having to do the least heavy lifting because your team is quite able to proficiently do the work.
Even if you only profited $7,500 over six months from a $45,000 contract but your team did the work and the client understands what you are delivering, thus making it so it’s not stressful and aggravating, you will still profit by signing up lots of such clients.
As a rule of thumb: a smaller project ought to have a higher profit margin but a larger project with a lower profit margin ought to produce more profit in dollars than a smaller project.
A highly aggravting client with extremely high profit in overall dollars, especially if also a high profit margin, would be held longer than an easy-going client with a low total profitability and profit margin.
It needs to be noted that higher profit margins mean you have cushion in case of a problem, you can pay your team more and attract higher quality, and you can both invest in your core infrastructure and in business growth.
No business is perfectly “there” and the drive to obtain such steady profitability through an ideal clientele can be offset by a cash flow need that means you must accept less profitable and more stressful projects that demand more of you just to keep the lights on. This is the reality of business but it shouldn’t stop you from seeking the ideal business client for most to all of our projects.
Every 90 days your team should evaluate your project list and describe each as ideal to less than ideal and be able to state both the profit margin and profit in total dollars for each. The least ideal overall should eventually be let go as more ideal clients can be obtained.
Democrats Think ONLY Democrats Can Question The Veracity of Election Voting Processes and Vote Counting
I don’t think the 2020 Presidential election vote count, or the way the pandemic was used to “fortify” the election process exclusively to favor Democrats and hamper Republicans, was free and fair and I, as an American, have every right to say that no matter what you Democrats think about it. Period.
Herr Biden, with his Snoke-like backdrop, saying “you can’t love this country only when you win” is hyperbolic and dangerous. It is a lie because questioning how an election was run doesn’t mean you hate your country and he knows that, because he engaged in it over the 2016 election and leading up to it.
The fact this electoral legerdemain is increasingly part of hardball politics and to some extent goes back centuries doesn’t mean I have to just accept it now or ever. We should always be hyper critical of such things. For decades I have proposed election reforms aimed at making such “legal” unethical legerdemain difficult and stamping out the potential for or appearance of fraud, so this isn’t new to me.
I questioned how the 2000 election went down, even though I didn’t like Gore.
Our voting processes and how we count the votes have been sloppy and are getting worse, and I think most of that is on the side of Democrats whose very ideology goes against a concept of having a true north when it comes to morals (e.g. “relativism”). It’s not as fraudulent as North Korea or Russia, but it is open to unethical legerdemain that may be legal but that undermines a republican system of government, and it appears to be getting worse.
The way rules were changed and the way mail-in ballots could never have a secure chain of custody from voter to vote counter did not inspire confidence. Absentee ballots are one thing, but the majority of votes counted for Democrats came from this and we have no secure and independent way to verify that the actual voters who were legally allowed to vote were the ONLY ballots handed in.
If you imagine in your fetid partisan hack brain that me saying this makes me a domestic terrorist or something, than you are the one who hates this country because you deny a fundamental right to dissent. I dissent from the way the election process was run in 2020 and continues to be run.
I may think the fear it was all fraud is overwrought, but saying the winner cheated in an election is practically an American pastime and acting as if only when Republicans do it is it somehow akin to domestic terrorism is actually far worse because now you are targeting millions of people and threatening them with a police-state response.
In Pennsylvania it was a mess, mostly due to the Republicans in the PA legislature who had passed actual laws abdicating their oversight to unelected officials who, I believe, proved to be partisan Democrats who put Party before the Commonwealth.
That is my opinion and I can be a free and patriotic American and still have such an opinion: anyone saying otherwise is just nuts or they are themselves in rebellion against These United States of America and our constitutional federal republican system.
I don’t think laws were broken per se, I think unethical legerdemain was used to lean things a few points in favor of Democrats in a way that we could say the 2020 Presidential election was not fair, because it wasn’t an even playing field with absolutely nuetral and objective referees, and because all the pandemic-excused “emergency” deviations from the mornal process 100% favored Democrats in every way.
That’s not fair and if it’s not fair how can it be free?
By Bill Collier- Before you blow a gasket on the crunchy magoo invoking his weak tinhorn dictator impression, badly I might add, remember President Biden is a tired and meandering sod, feckless to the core. He always seems to get all bombastic and macho just before he cuts and runs. And, no, his handlers are no better.
Joe Biden may fantasize about being THE GREAT DICTATOR (was that Charlie Chaplain?) but all his sound and fury signifies nothing.
Please don’t be alarmed and don’t over react. Yes, it was a nasty low rent bit of tragicomic lunacy, and yes, I think he really imagines the only valid opinions are his own, and, yes, it can be seen even as an attempt at bullying. But what makes it harmless is that Joe Biden’s ability to make life hard one anyone else doesn’t go beyond his speech.
To be clear: President Biden could order everyone under his command to “round up the MAGA crowd” and as he marched out in front of his “troops” waving some sort of weird rainbow soviet flag, nobody would follow except a few grungy FBI spooks, too pale to stay in the sun too long.
Here’s a clue Joe: just because you won the White House doesn’t mean you get to decide now is the time to outlaw your opponents and demonize half the country. We need to remind you that, again, we are a Republic, which means even if 51% want to outlaw 49%, the rights of all, real rights not that gibberish you invoked, the government, including you, cannot actually do that.
It’s pathetic because even if he means what he says, he is powerless to do it. We should all be laughing now.
No sane person who refuses to get all in a lather over oat milk lattes, like Biden’s inner circle of cancel culturists do, can take this speech seriously. It’s a bad joke he is playing on himself. It MIGHT be dangerous if it wasn’t spoken by this weak President, but it’s just Joe bloviating like an angry blogger who watches too much MSNBC and doesn’t get out much.
Fortunately for you and I, the soul of our country is not the domain of a politician who sounds like he was sniffing glue.
Does he think politics is all about who can meme better or talk bigger? Will he now tell the world that we Republicans “are bad to infinity” or some other schoolyard cackle?
It’s true, and it’s frankly quite immoral, that President Biden is now the divider in chief and his caustic words and rhetoric, almost 100% untruthful and sensationalist, even bordering on the leftist version of Q, is the kind of talk people with pots and pans for hats who weave baskets and dribble uncontrollably would give to their collection of voodoo dolls.
It is not acceptable or civil, it is indecent and unbecoming of any American leader. But it’s also a bad look, it’s poorly delivered, and frankly sounds like the people who made the last Star Wars movie were directing the whole lame show.
Biden chose today to prove something many suspected: his mission in life is to lead and serve the Democratic Party machine, especially the blue and pink haired wokatarians with their long lists of ever more weird pronouns, and the donors who own that Party’s soul, not the American Republic, which he cannot even invoke as he touts the old lie we are a “democracy.”
That’s all bad for him and he will one day answer to the Universe and his Creator for his undertakings and his highly unethical behavior, but as for me, I saw a muttering nutter high on his own sense of self-importance larping as a BIG MAN when in truth he is just a typical politician whose only agenda is limited to his Party’s parochial interests.
Joe, the gig is up. Everyone knows you “ain’t got game.”
I almost wrote “tonight Joe Biden set this country on fire”, but he would have to be one thousand percent more the man he has been acting like for there to be any real weight to this nonsensical juvenile blabbering.
Tonight I saw a guy who probaly sniffs his own feet pretend he was the moral better than everyone else and a nasty old politician who confuses his own Party with the country, as if whatever is “good” for the Democratic Party is somehow by extension good for America. It’s one of the most embarrassing displays of political stupidity in our country’s history.
Californians will soon be able to terminate the life of their unborn child from the comfort of their own home after the California State Assembly passed AB 223. The bill states people cannot be charged for performing a self-induced abortion.
The California State Legislature passed a bill Tuesday that would protect women from legal penalties for inducing their own abortions, and which includes controversial language on “perinatal” death.
The bill, AB 2223, introduced by Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland), is just one of several measures expanding abortion that the legislature has considered as the U.S. Supreme Court has reversed Roe v. Wade. Voters will consider a constitutional amendment this November that would protect abortion through birth.
Calculations based on statistics provided by medical journals and government surveys in the United States show that abortions for the “hard cases” are much rarer than most people believe.
While Pew found that sizable majorities of Americans said abortion should be legal if a woman’s health is at stake (73 percent) or if the pregnancy was a result of rape or incest (69 percent), just over half (54 percent) said it should be legal if the baby was likely to be born with severe disabilities or health issues.
The stage of pregnancy especially affects people’s views of abortion. Pew found that in the first six weeks of pregnancy, 51 percent of people said abortion should be generally legal, compared with 26 percent who said it should be illegal. By 24 weeks into a pregnancy, just 29 percent said it should be generally legal while 42 percent said it should be generally illegal.
Abortions on Black women have now reached their highest percentage since 2000, according to newly released data from the Centers for Disease Control .
The abortion data, released in November and analyzed by Live Action News, reveals that in 2016, while Black women accounted for 38 percent of reported abortions, population estimates for 2016 show that African Americans made up just 12 percent of the population. This news comes on the heels of deliberate efforts by the abortion lobby to market abortions among women of color as a positive.
This is more an essay than a quick article. The views hear-in are those of the author, alone.
As a certain writer once said, there is nothing wrong with fearing pain, deprivation and hardship…and I agree. Hence, I am a “survivalist” (rr, “prepper“, if you prefer). No — I don’t have the elaborate underground bunker (I wish!), and no, I do not sit on a mountain of supplies (again, I wish!), but the attitude is there.
I think about it. I plan for it. I continually assess and reassess my options.
So I wondered: where does this come from? Why have I always been concerned about massive damage, and massive dislocations of society? Am I weird? Disturbed?
Well – I grew up in California, so…Yeah — pretty much…And for all the Californio’s reading this: How many of you remember the “earthquake exercises” we used to do? You know the ones: Do you know where the key is, to turn off the gas in case of an earthquake? So the house doesn’t explode? Did you make up earthquake kits in school? Bottles of water, before it was fashionable, and cans of Chef-Boy-Ar-Dee and Campbell’s Pork-n-Beans, squirreled away in corners of the house, so that at least one or two would be sure to survive a big shaker?
…Then, of course, it was the early 80’s. And yes — I’ve been at this since the early 80’s. I’ve already made all the mistakes you need to avoid.
So, what is the point of all this?
Recently, in the last few years, there has been a rise in “reality” programming of so-called “prepper” shows, chief among them, National Geographic Channel’s “Doomsday Preppers“, where the show visits various “survivalists” – or “preppers” – and documents their ideas and strategies. Other shows work on a similar format.
The only problem is, the entire thrust of most of these programs is to demonize anyone involved in “prepping” as a paranoid freak, resulting in many people shaking their heads, and turning away from the very idea of carrying more than a tire iron and a set of jumper cables in their car.
This is a disastrous situation, one that magnifies the already terrible effects of a disaster – be it natural or man-made – by planting the seed in people’s minds that it is “crazy” to prepare for a disaster.
How do these shows do this? By highlighting one of two conditions, and magnifying them far out of proportion, for the “Wow!” effect: the shows seek the most extreme survivalists, and seek to show either their “vast” resources or their “extreme” views, or both. Normal, rational people see these views as either unattainable or dangerous and frightening, and stay away from the entire idea…
…Which is usually about the time a major disaster befalls them.
In fact, disaster preparation is much like insurance — a person does not get home insurance because they intend to destroy their home, they get it, in case some disaster (earthquake, fire, flood, hurricane, a car driving through the front wall, etc.) might happen at some point.
Preparing to mitigate the effects of an extreme disaster is no different.
US Navy Lifeboat Survival Kit, c.1943. US Navy photo.
For all that, there are a lot of well-meaning people out there trying to prepare for “Disaster ‘X'”, who are wasting precious resources, money, brain sweat, real sweat and time operating along a very poor planning cycle.
First, there has to be a clear understanding of what I call the “Survival Breadbox” — an interactive rectangle of arrays of items that define capabilities. Most people approach the Box neither knowing what it is, nor really understanding it, and only perceive it in a disjointed fashion; in fact, failure to understand the Box is why many preppers give up, as it looks far too complicated and frustrating. However, once you understand the Box, you can start planning effectively, and – most importantly – successfully implementing those plans.
The reason I describe the Box as an “interactive rectangle” is because there are four points to it…
The “EEK”
The Week-Long 72-Hour Window
The Cantonment
The Panoply
The reason these are in a rectangle, rather than a hierarchy, is that they feed off of each other, and operate together to form a cohesive whole — you can function without one of the corners for a while, but you had better address it, and FAST, before you run into a situation where you.
One of the most common mistakes preppers make is to plan for “Disaster ‘X’“…only to have “Disaster ‘L’” show up. I tend to take this from the point of view that anything that significantly disrupts the nation’s logistical infrastructure for more than a week is the “worst case”.
Roadway damage, Oslo, MN, May, 2009. FEMA photo.
Why? Because the country functions on its logistical infrastructure — you might garden, but how many reading this grow their own cotton, harvest it, process it, and make clothing out of it? How many people reading this can go out to a local store, and buy a metal object that was made locally, that went straight from raw ore to a finished product, “locally” being defined as “within 100 miles from where you live”?
Based on that, chances are good that the person reading this got every single thing in their house from off of a truck, something that was made somewhere else, and rather far away…including the food in your fridge. And if the system that makes all that flow smoothly is disrupted, everything will quickly get seriously out of whack, as every business requires a steady flow of widgets to function — and even if the place that makes Widget A still functions, and can get its product to its customer, that Widget is useless without the other 30 or 30,000 widgets that make the final product work.
Most preppers recognize this at some level, and don’t know what to do about it…so they try hard to ignore it…
Let’s look at each point in the Box.
First, is the “EEK” — the “Escape and Evasion Kit“. This is almost always currently referred to as a “bug-out bag“, or a “Get Out Of Dodge” (GOOD) kit. I casually detest both terms. Why? Because they put people in the wrong mindset.
If you are “bugging out” or “getting out of Dodge“, this implies that you will have some warning, so it might be appropriate to take “whatever you can carry“…
…Folks – you’re not packing to go hiking at Aspen. So why, oh, WHY do you carry five ways to start a fire? This isn’t the Scouts.
If you actually needto use a kit like this, things have gone ‘BLOOEY‘ in a major and surprising way, and you suddenly need to get from Point A to Point B — on foot. Now, if the ‘BLOOEY‘ has happened, just how many otherpeople do you think are going to be trying to get to an area somewhere near Point B?
Then WHY ARE YOU DRAWING ATTENTION TO YOURSELF WITH A FIRE? Worse – COOKING?! People who are scared and hungry will come after you like a moth to a flame. Why? Because sound, light, and smell all carry a LONG way, and while someone alone might not want to risk a confrontation on Day 1, what about Day 2? Or Day 4? What happens when their children are hungry, and you don’t have enough food to share?
Now, the truly selfless will try to help as many as they can, as quickly as they can – and that’s a good thing…under normal circumstances. What happens when things are no longer ‘normal‘? What happens when you have to decide between the children of a person you’ve never met, and your ownchildren? Not as easy a question, now, is it?
Ain’t moral dilemma’s great?
First rule of the EEK: Do NOT draw attention to yourself.
Second rule of the EEK: Travel light!
What should be in an EEK? Everyone will customize it, but try this yardstick: if your EEK won’t fit into a common student backack, you have too much stuff in it…
A military-spec rain poncho
A first aid kit
A multitool and/or a Swiss Army Knife
A 4″ lock blade Knife
Two methods of purifying water that do NOT involve fire
At least one quart-sized water bottle (like a Gatorade bottle or a military-style canteen)
Now, most preppers have seen this before, and are thinking that is waaaay too light for three days. Yet, you can in fact carry a three days of food in a small day pack, if you are using USCG Ration packs…you don’t even need to carry too many extra condiments.
As well, let us not discuss the person with the fifteen knives (seriously — the video will leave you slack-jawed) in their kit.
Remember: The EEK is supposed to get you from Point A to Point B, on foot, in 3 – 5 day’s time. Planning on anything else means that you need to use the next tier…
Next, we’ll look at the “Week-Long 72-Hour Kit“.
Preppers frequently talk about the “3 day’s worth of supplies“. I’m not entirely sure why. In fact, the only reference I know of about this time-frame comes from a now-outdated FEMA flyer…Refer to Hurricane Sandy.
This is your “standard” disaster kit. It is intended to help you survive-in-place until help arrives. FEMA says “a few days”; 5 is realistic; 14-90 days is not a bad idea.
Note that this is not intended for you to carry — the amount of supplies and equipment is too great to carry on your back, and if you plan on being on the road for longer than three days to reach your cantonment (q.v.)…you need a better plan.
The only “prepper”-type features you will likely see in this kit are 55-gallon water barrels (based on 5 gallons of water, per person, per day; yes, you can get by with one gallon per person/day, but you won’t like it) and various types of stoves, grills or Dutch Ovens for cooking without electricity or gas.
And speaking of water, make sure to not simply store a few bottles of it – you need ways to purify it, preferably ways that do not involve fire. These methods involve bleach (16 drops to the gallon, per FEMA), or some sort of filtration system…As an aside, you should really look into your local laws concerning the capture and retention of rainwater — you may be both alarmed, amazed, horrified and outraged at just what some of these laws actually say. Forewarned, etc.
One of the advantages in this, similar to the Cantonment, is that you can eat what you are accustomed to eating normally, albeit with different cooking methods. If you’ve never tried to make rice on a Weber Grill — you need to get on that.
Since you’re not planning on moving, you also do not need to worry overmuch about things like cold storage, unless you take medications that require refrigeration. For that, you may want to look into either a solar PV power station, or a small gasoline-powered generator, to run a portable fridge.
Since you’re already at home, you don’t really need to acquire too much in the way of “special” foods, although you do want to make sure that you maintain a 5 – 14 day stockpile of food, minimum, of the kind of foods that will keep for a long time. (Hint: The expiration dates on canned goods are there for two reasons: to get you to rotate stock, and to absolve the manufacturer of legal responsibility if you are stupid enough to eat from a bulging or stinky can.)
Properly sealed canned goods, in cans that are not badly dented, will keep and be both edible and nutritious (I did NOT say “Will remain tasty”!) for up to 10 years; however, this DOES NOT apply to high-acidity foods like tomatoes.
Another important aspect of this kit that is shared by the Cantonment is the easy access to distraction materials — i.e., books and games.
What?
Role-playing dice set.
Hey, if a disaster has happened, and things are in the process of going back to normal, you are going to have a lot of downtime; it’s not like you’re going to be at work. Without power, your laptop/device batteries will die out fast, and roll-up PV panels only go so far. So…Have “distraction tools” ready to hand: boardgames, cards, RPG’s (the paper and pencil kind), and most importantly, BOOKS.
Third, we’ll look at the “Cantonment“.
This is a word derived from military use to describe a permanent or semi-permanent installation. In the early 80’s, when big-S ‘Survivalism’ was in the public consciousness, this was called the “Survival Retreat”.
The main idea goes like this: You have a workaday life and home in The Big City…but you have a “cabin in the woods”, or a patch of undeveloped land that you pull an RV onto to “camp” every now and then. However, you realize that if anything truly terrible happens, and things go south with a quickness, staying in the Big City is a B-A-D idea. The Retreat, or Cantonment, is the place you are going to “take a sudden vacation” to as things go ‘BLOOEY!’ In the event of a sudden-onset disaster, you may find yourself using the EEK, above – or even the Panoply, below – to ‘exfiltrate’ (i.e., “Get the F— OUT, NOW!“) out of the City.
Does that sound paranoid to you? You certainly don’t seem to think that it is, if you’re still reading this, this far in…That’s because you are likely old enough – or at least Net-savvy enough – to re-watch the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and/or the Rodney King Riots in Los Angeles to realize that, if things go south badly, even if order gets restored eventually, what condition are you going to be in, if you try to “stick it out” at home?
Now – just imagine what will happen when “…order will not be restored for ‘some time’…maybe as long as three to six months“. (That, incidentally, is a verbatim quote that I got once, I kid you not, not from any wild-eyed, ‘tin-foil-hat’ person, but from an executive of a major international corporation, in a public meeting…)
The Cantonment is a piece of property set out “in the sticks” (which is different, depending on who you talk to). It could be a bare spot of land, an empty-appearing field with a bunker buried underneath, or it could be an actual “Summer/Winter Home“…But one well-stocked, with a good deal of supplies socked away.
Whatever Cantonment model you choose, its location should not be more than one half-tank plus 10 gallons of gas in your primary vehicle in distance from your home; for most people, this equals about 400 miles, at the low end. Really, you shouldn’t be driving more than 200 miles if things are breaking down, unless you are making the Cantonment your full-time residence.
Whatever the case, the Cantonment needs to have some kind of land on it, even a measly quarter-acre. This is because, when things go ‘BLOOEY!’, you will need to get a ‘Victory Garden‘ going, and fast…
Victory Garden, 1943. Library of Congress.
Note that I said ‘Victory GARDEN‘. Singular. You might be able to plant two or three plots, maximum, but unless you already know what it’s like…don’t plan on being a “farmer”. If you haven’t worked the job, you have absolutely NO idea how back-breaking of a job it truly is. You need to get on the gardening bandwagon now, if you haven’t, already.
One thing most people thinking about a Cantonment do not think of is ‘community’. Believe me – ‘No Man Is An Island’ is the name of the game, here. You, the ‘significant other’, two kids and the dog do not an effective defense force make. Get to know your neighbors – NOW – and try to get a good idea of where they stand and what they plan to do. If they plan on sticking around, bring them in gently, and ply them with their favorite “tasty beverage”. If things are going to hell, friendly neighbors with a joint plan beat the heck out of the alternative.
This brings us, at long last, to the fourth point: the Panoply.
The US Army Soldier Protection System, 2019. US Army photo.
The word ‘panoply’ comes from the Greek word ‘panopilia‘ (πανοπλία), meaning literally, “all arms“. The Panoply was the complete ‘fighting kit’ of the ancient Greek fighting man, the Hoplite. It included his weapons (spear, sword and dagger), his armor (shield, cuirass, and greaves), his sandals if he wore any, and all the rest of the gear he wore on the march.
…”Oh, no! Here we go, with the “militia” rant! I KNEW it was coming!”
Yes. And?
Look — I appreciate the idea that people generally do not wish to do violence to their fellow human beings. I get that. Really. However, I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but a whole lot of your fellow humans to not feel the same way — make them hungry, tired and scared, and it will be infinitely worse.
We haven’t even started discussing already-organized gangs.
One of the basic principle of Western culture is the concept that a free person should “armed, and trained to arms“. That idea has been much-criticized recently, mostly by a certain sector that enjoys the freedom to criticize such “outmoded notions” while hiding behind the guns of those who do not subscribe to the idea of “situational ethics“.
Okay so, politics aside, what is in the modern Panoply? Well, at first glance, it will look a lot like the EEK, but there are important differences, differences that are based on psychology.
The panoply is about one thing, and one thing, only: fighting. While the EEK is designed to help you flee, the panoply is intended to make you orders of magnitude more effective at defense than simply standing in your doorway with a double-barreled 12gauge.
I’m not overly worried about the anti-gunners who read this, who are already frothing at the mouth — one of two things applies to these folks: a) you’re kidding yourselves, and you are just going to learn the hard way, or b) if the ‘BLOOEY!’ happens, you won’t last long enough to have to worry about it.
There’s no point in couching that with an apologia, either — it is what it is. You will either make the (very minimal) effort to save your own life, or you won’t. I have no input on that, whatsoever. That’s all on you.
I sincerely hope that no one else’s life is dependent upon your choice.
If you’re reading this, and you live in the US or Canada, you have a very limited time (especially if you live in Canada) to get the ‘big-ticket’ items that you require, because there are a LOT of people out there in positions of authority who want to remove your ability to obtain these things. That’s not politics — that’s on the news, if you care to watch it at all.
So, let’s get the ‘big tickets’ out of the way, first. What do you need: a rifle, a pistol, or a shotgun?
I’m going to take this from the premise that the reader has little-to-no experience with firearms as they read this — so all of the “gun guru’s” out there, yes, I appreciate that you have an opinion, but this is MY article…write your own.
If you have only limited experience with firearms, stay away from handguns of any type, at least at first — pistols take a great deal of training and practice to use effectively, and even after shooting from the age of 5, I do not consider myself to be any kind of expert.
“Long guns” – rifles and shotguns – are MUCH easier to learn, and arguably more effective at what you are trying to use them for: pistols are ultra-short range weapons, and are suitable only for last-ditch self defense. Yes, I know a lot of people carry concealed handguns legally — I don’t carry at all, as a matter of personal choice — and that police and some Special Forces units carry them as a primary “offensive” armament…But take a good, long look at where those folk’s targets are: within 50 feet, and usually a LOT closer.
This is something you REALLY want to avoid. Trust me, here.
Small Arms, Panama, 1989. USMC photo.
A shotgun would be a good place to start, but there are some disadvantages: while it does use a variety of ammunition types, its range is usually limited to about 100 yards, maximum (and usually under 40 yards with any accuracy, for most people), and shooting accurately requires a lot of practice to master.
Rifles, on the other hand, require comparatively less time to become proficient with. Also, they are accurate all the way out to 300-1,000 or more yards, depending on exactly what you are carrying…And no, you’re probably not going to need anything that shoots more than 300-500 yards — unless you get good enough to make the long ranges work.
The answer is — something simple. Something that is fun to shoot, is reliable, reasonably accurate ‘as is’, with no mechanical modifications, that uses a commonly available caliber.
The later-production AR-15’s (the ones with the 20-inch barrels…just trust me, here – copious amounts of “adult beverages” are needed for that technical of a discussion) are perfectly fine — as are the AK-47’s…but don’t limit your options. There are plenty of fine weapons out there that are not AR’s or AK’s, that will more than fill your needs. Don’t turn your nose up at a bolt-action rifle, or an SKS carbine because some pundit called them “outdated antiques”.
Once you have a firearm, you need to practicewith it. That may seem obvious, but people raised on a steady diet of “first-person” shooting games seem to think that firearms are like USB connections – pick it up, and just “become accurate”. No…Just…No — Remember: The “…train to arms” part means that you need to TRAINwith whatever weapon you obtain.
After you decide on a rifle, you need ammunition, and not just ammunition to train with.
Ammunition comes in boxes or cases — rifle ammo comes in 20-round boxes, pistol ammo in 50-round boxes; cases generally run from 500 rounds (for shotguns) to one or two thousand rounds for rifles, depending on caliber and manufacturer.
I won’t get into reloading, here, although the economics of reloading your own ammunition will quickly become apparent to the new shooter, especially if your weapons are in heavy or odd calibers.
Loaded M-16 magazines, 2017. US Army photo.
In general, for a rifle, you’re going to need about 600 rounds “ready” — about 200 rounds to carry with the rifle, plus two more reloads; this also includes magazines sufficient to carry those 600 rounds…Think about that, the next time someone wants to restrict magazine sizes, Stephen King notwithstanding [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCSySuemiHU]. This is the bare minimum, but if you started off by buying a 1000-round case, that leaves you c.400 rounds to start practicing with.
After that? It depends on your wallet, how much you intend to practice, and exactly what you’re preparing for.
After that comes “gear”. A lot of this looks remarkably like the EEK, and there is, in fact, a great deal of overlap between the two.
The BASIC kit for the Panoply looks something like this…
A rifle
200 ‘ready’ rounds for the above rifle, with another 400 as a ‘ready reserve’
Some type of “load bearing equipment” to distribute the ammunition and magazines (if your rifles uses magazines – see “bolt action rifles“, the “SKS” or the “M1 Garand“) more evenly across your body.
Should you buy camouflage uniforms? If you intend to operate with a unit of some type, it’s a good idea, because it makes it that much easier to identify your friends. Uniforms are not about some arcane, male power fantasy — like a shovel, they are a practical tool, nothing more.
What camo is ‘best’? Whatever works for your environment — ex-US “Woodland BDU” is excellent, if a little on the common side, although Vietnam-era Tigerstripe is usually better. The current rage is for digital pattern camo or the newer Multicam pattern. Really, it depends on your environment, and common sense: don’t wear a desert pattern in the Tennessee forest, and don’t wear Woodland BDU in the desert.
Do you need a gas mask? If you live within 5 miles of an operating railroad line, you do — those tanker cars aren’t carrying milk, and when a train derails and they start evacuating, they’re doing it for a reason.
If you can afford body armor — BUY some. If not — you’re going to have to take your chances without it. Practical, affordable body armor in the firearm era didn’t exist before the early 70’s, so you’ll be in good company.
And BOOTS — Ye GAWDS, but don’t forget GOOD boots! If you have to spend $200 on a pair of boots, but they are the best thing out there…DO IT! You feet will thank you later.
…Despite what some people will try to tell you, there is no hard and fast rule about gear and equipment — the regular military makes it easy: you wear/carry what you are issued. When you’re not in the regular military, you have to customize as a matter of course — find what works for you, by going to an Army-Navy surplus store (or even the local ‘Chinese Consulate‘…a.k.a., “Walmart“) and trying things on before you plonk down the hard cash for this stuff.
The Grand Rapids based non-profit healthcare provider says a newly interpreted Michigan law is forcing religious organizations to violate their religious beliefs.
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — In a landmark decision by the Michigan Supreme Court in July, the state’s anti-discrimination law was interpreted to cover sexual orientation.
The court, in a 5-2 opinion, said the word “sex” in Michigan’s key civil rights law applies to sexual orientation and not just gender.
Now, a Christian based non-profit healthcare provider is filing a religious discrimination lawsuit against Michigan Attorney General, Dana Nessel.
The Grand Rapids based healthcare provider, Christian Healthcare Centers, filed the federal lawsuit Monday saying the state’s anti-discrimination law violates the organization’s religious beliefs.
“We are determined to help the Afghan people we work to assist the Afghan people multilaterally through the UN and this Council,” Thomas-Greenfield told a UN Security Council briefing on Afghanistan.
Last year, the United States led a UN Security Council effort to unanimously adopt a resolution that established a carve-out for the delivery of humanitarian aid for the Afghan people, Thomas-Greenfield said.
The ambassador noted that the United States is the biggest donor to Afghanistan, contributing more than $2 billionDollars in humanitarian assistance to the country.
The U.S. government cannot require several Christian medical groups and providers to perform abortions or gender transition surgeries under the Affordable Care Act, a federal appeals court has ruled.
A unanimous panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday upheld a lower court’s permanent order shielding Christian Medical and Dental Associations and Specialty Physicians of Illinois, along with Catholic hospital system Franciscan Alliance Inc, from any enforcement action under the ACA’s anti-discrimination provision, known as Section 1557, for refusing to perform the procedures, which they say would violate their religious freedom.
Circuit Judge Don Willett, joined by Circuit Judges Jennifer Elrod and Kurt Engelhardt, rejected the government’s argument that the case should be dismissed as moot because the original rule challenged by the providers had been overturned. Willett wrote that the providers still faced harm because the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had “repeatedly refused to disavow enforcement” against them.
Republicans hoping to seize control of the House in November are already setting their sights on what is, for many of them, a top priority next year: impeaching President Biden.
A number of rank-and-file conservatives have already introduced impeachment articles in the current Congress against the president. They accuse Biden of committing “high crimes” in his approach to a range of issues touching on border enforcement, the coronavirus pandemic and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
Those resolutions never had a chance of seeing the light of day, with Democrats holding a narrow control of the lower chamber. But with Republicans widely expected to win the House majority in the midterms, many of those same conservatives want to tap their new potential powers to oust a president they deem unfit. Some would like to make it a first order of business.
“I have consistently said President Biden should be impeached for intentionally opening our border…
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
.png%2F440px-Taliban_Humvee_in_Kabul%252C_August_2021_(cropped).png&f=1&nofb=1 "Biden Looks to UN to get US Billions to Taliban’s Afghanistan")
