Google Protects Advocates of Unborn Child Murder

Paul Collier November 6, 2023

Google is using its monopoly on search engines to engineer results favorable to the cult of death, that is, abortion, censoring pro-life outlets and promoting pro-unborn-child murder outlets according to MRC Free Speech America, who ran a test of the search engine to show the intentional throttling of pro-life messaging and the promotion of pro-abortion messaging.

MRC President Brent Bozell said of the research’s findings, “Google is in lockstep with their leftist allies and the legacy media. Google’s algorithm continues to elevate research favorable to the pro-aborts while suppressing good news for the pro-life movement.”

From lifenews:

MRC Free Speech America searched Google, Bing and DuckDuckGo to test how the search engines would rank pro-life topics. MRC researchers used a “clean environment” to search Google, Bing and DuckDuckGo for basic information about a pro-abortion study dubbed the “Turnaway Study.” The study ostensibly compared the social, psychological and financial outcomes of women who had undergone an abortion and those who were turned away due to the gestational age of their babies. Leftist media and abortion activists often tout that the study found that 95 percent of women in the group who underwent the abortions “feel that abortion was the right decision.” However, the study also found — inconveniently for those pushing the pro-abortion message — that 96 percent of women in the group who were unable to get abortions did not regret having their baby.

When MRC researchers searched Google for the terms “study women did not regret having baby” on October 20, Google buried the pro-life results at the bottom of the page as the twenty-fifth and twenty-seventh results. Results at the top of the page referenced other parts of the problematic study. For example, Google’s first result is an article from the University of San Francisco, where the turnaway study was conducted. “Five Years After Abortion, Nearly All Women Say It Was the Right Decision, Study Finds,” the headline read. The article made no mention at all of the 96 percent of women who did not regret having their baby.

MRC Free Speech America Director Michael Morris said, “Whether it’s censoring key Senate races, pro-free speech platforms, COVID-19 wrongspeak or former President of the United States Donald Trump, Google’s leftist bent is clear. So it should come as little surprise that Google’s pro-abortion agenda is trumpeted loud and clear also. ‘By their fruit, you shall know them.’ In Google’s case, the fruit is obvious: evil.”

A society that allows the unborn to be sub-humanized will soon sub-humanize any that opposes its cult of death, and we can see that tragically writ large in America today.

Far-Left Medical Schools Now Forcing Students to Murder Unborn Children

Paul Collier November 2, 2023

The far-left cancer that has infested America’s medical schools has now led to the de facto forcing of medical students to violate their conscience and God’s laws. The medical schools are pressuring medical students who want to stay in good standing with the program (and thus get good career opportunities afterwards) to conduct abortions, that is, to murder unborn children to prove they’re part of team death, the DNC-CCP cult.

From thecollegefix.com:

To remain accredited, osteopathic medical schools now must show they support “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” And to be viewed as well-rounded OB-GYNs, medical students are feeling pressured to do elective abortions.

Gavin Oxley, the founder and CEO of Future Medical Professionals for Life, wrote at Real Clear Policy this month about the difficulties pro-life medical students face, noting how the curriculum “has been structured to encourage students to forsake their conscience for politics.”

Currently, Oxley said medical schools require elective abortion training, with an opt-out option for students who believe “do no harm” includes babies in the womb. However, he said this puts an “unethical” burden on the students.

“Opt-out requirements apply when training is automatically required unless you choose to go through an administrative process that allows you not to participate,” he wrote. “Such requirements place unethical pressures on medical students/residents to violate their conscience in order to not be targeted for their life-affirming beliefs.”

Few OB-GYNs provide elective abortions, with one study putting the number at 14 percent. According to the American Association of Pro-Life OB-GYNs, aborting an unborn baby is not the essential medical care that groups like the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists say it is.

More and more Americans are beginning to realize that getting medical help from ethical doctors will be increasingly difficult as the doctors who were not subject to the leftist cult-of-death-tyranny die out and retire in disgust, leaving us to the mercy of cowards and bloodthirsty killers who put their pedophilic ideology over the care and interests of their own patients.

Medical establishments now include forms that have options for people to deny their own biological reality, allowing them to claim to be some sex other than male or female. This writer has already run into this with most of the medical establishments available to me now.

The time for Americans, especially American doctors, to form their own institutions that are free from the cancer that is the far left’s ideology of child sacrifice and basic biological denial is now. We believe in science, we believe in medical knowledge, but in the hands of killers and cowards that “science” becomes pseudo-science.

More Americans will die as the rise in incompetence is sure to follow when you populate the institutions with the cowards who go along with the hateful ideology and the bloodthirsty killers that believe these anti-human lies.

Trump Calls Chutkan’s Bluff on Violently Unconstitutional Gag Order

Paul Collier November 1, 2023

On Sunday, Lawfare Assassin foreign-born DNC-CCP Judge Chutkan reinstated the gag order, but in a limited sense, ordering Trump to not make “public comments targeting prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses,” despite the fact that the DNC-serving prosecutors and many of the potential witnesses are direct political opponents to Trump’s 2024 Presidential runs.

While prosecutors wanted Trump thrown in jail, Chutkan chose not to do that as she rightly fears the backlash that would cause across the country as half or more of American citizens would rightly interpret such a move as a clear sign the Federal government is a direct enemy to their American rights and values in an existential sense of that term. Trump for his part is all-but pledging to defy the order, saying of it that “It will not stand.”

Trump stated, “I have just learned that the very Biased, Trump-Hating Judge in D.C., who should have RECUSED herself due to her blatant and open loathing of your favorite President, ME, has reimposed a GAG ORDER which will put me at a disadvantage against my prosecutorial and political opponents This order, according to many legal scholars, is unthinkable! It illegally and unconstitutionally takes away my First Amendment Right of Free Speech, in the middle of my campaign for President, where I am leading against BOTH Parties in the Polls. Few can believe this is happening, but I will appeal. How can they tell the leading candidate that he, and only he, is seriously restricted from campaigning in a free and open manner? It will not stand!”

It is becoming more and more evident that the DNC-CCP will stop at almost nothing they feel they can get away with to bury any opposition to fulfil the promise first made by then President-elect Obama, who claimed upon his accession to power he would “fundamentally transform” America, a seditious statement in and of itself that should have gotten him arrested and sent to Guantanamo Bay along with the other terrorists seeking to murder their way to power at the expense of our liberty-loving republic.

White House Moves to Mold A.I in its Anti-American Image

Paul Collier October 31, 2023

The Biden White House will use the King’s decree, an Executive Order, to attempt to mold AI in its dark, anti-American, anti-human image, announcing plans to create a sweeping executive order that will bypass the legislative process, giving, ostensibly, a demented old man the power to dictate to the country the terms of its AI use.

The order is justified by White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, who reveals his anti-Americanism in his very speech. He said “Given the pace of this technology, we can’t move in normal government or private-sector pace, we have to move fast, really fast – ideally faster than the technology itself. You have to continue to be proactive, anticipate where things are headed, continue to act fast and pull every lever we can.”

Normal government pace is the standard of our constitutional republic, which this White House is working diligently to destroy. Whether it’s fear of the white race, or man-made climate change, or, now AI, the White House will trot out any monster it can to terrorize Americans to fear so much for their safety they’re willing to surrender their American constitutional liberty to the demagogues behind the manipulation of reality that led them to that fear in the first place.

To be sure, God will use this regime in part to check some aspects of AI that should be checked. No matter how hard Satan and those who knowingly or unknowingly follow his agenda (to lead humanity to suicide), God will turn what they meant for evil into good. So not all aspects of whatever this god-like executive order contains will even be opposed by this writer, or, I would wager, you, the American reader.

Still, one must be vigilant not to be conformed to this world, not to be conditioned to accept the precedent this executive order hopes to create, empowering the President to create legislation without going through congress as our Constitution demands, thus undermining the Constitution’s actual power in the minds of anyone that blindly cedes such power to this demented old man in the name of fear.

From ktvz.com:

The executive order, which Biden will unveil at an event Monday, is sweeping in scope. It will require developers of powerful AI systems to share results of their safety tests with the federal government before they are released to the public.

If an AI model being developed poses national security, economic or health risks, the order will compel companies to notify the federal government under the Defense Production Act.

The action will also ease immigration barriers for workers skilled in critical areas of AI to study and stay in the US; establish standards to prevent AI production of dangerous biological materials; and develop best practices to minimize the risk of AI displacing human workers.

The order aims to prevent AI-related fraud by directing the Commerce Department to develop guidance for watermarking AI-generated content.

And it will spell out government use of AI, including standards for safety but also measures to help agencies acquire new technology that could increase efficiency or cut costs.

It should be noted that nowhere does the writer of this article even raise the flag on how dangerous it is to leave such a critical issue as how a nation is to govern such a powerful tool, that is as dangerous as it is filled with opportunity, in the pen of one doddering old man, or any one person, in an action that, if the American people accept it, kills the letter and spirit of our constitution.

The GOP-led House should, at the very least, pass resolutions declaring this action to be an overt violation of the Rule of Law, and for that reason alone should immediately impeach this President and any official connected to it that congress has the power to impeach.

The far-left has proven they are willing to build their hateful ideology into every institution they can, and AI will be no different. They hope to control this tool to control resistance to the Satanic cause they serve, the elimination of the human species from the face of the planet, even if they don’t fully, or even remotely, understand or believe they are doing.

The Walls Are Closing In On Trump and Our Union

Bill Collier October 27, 2023

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump, 45th President of these United States of America, but, what few of his persecutors or prosecutors (depending on your perspective) realize is that this also shows that the walls are closing in on the very existence of our Union as a single country. As every day brings new setbacks for Trump’s legal defense, and as once staunch allies cover themselves by sacrificing him to the altars of Democrats in high dudgeon, the very substance of our Union weakens.

THIS IS NOT A COMMENTARY on Trump, on his guilt or innocence, or anything like that. It is an analysis of the potential impacts to the strength of our Union which follow the possible scenarios that may unfold.

Let’s cover the diverse perspectives.

You may think Trump is guilty and should be punished like anyone else would be. You may think he is guilty but also think his opponents are also coloring outside the legal lines and wonder why the law isn’t being equally applied. You may think Trump may have veered close to the legal line and didn’t cross it, but his opponents are using it against him while covering up their own actual crimes. You may think Trump is innocent, and this is a witch hunt, a totally political persecution, lawfare. Beyond these perspectives, there are shades in between as well, filled with nuance.

The legal question is “guilty or not guilty.”

If you think Trump is guilty and knows it, then you are frustrated he hasn’t just admitted it and backed out of his bid for a second term for the good of the country. What appalls you about your fellow citizens and divides you from them is how so many could be conned into following an obviously bad person.

If you think Trump is innocent, or not guilty, you look at the Biden administration and the bureaucrats in DC and wonder why they don’t, for the good of the country, disengage and disavow the lawfare and play ball fairly. What appalls you about your fellow citizens is how so many could be OK with such an obvious abuse of power knowing they can’t win on an even playing field.

Perhaps the truth doesn’t easily fit those two perspectives and perhaps one might ask a deeper question of both sides: how seriously are they taking the repercussions of their actions in light of the threat to our political fabric? When we see something like around 40% of Republicans and Democrats saying that force should be used against the other side we are hearing the klaxon of chaos and ruin approaching but nobody seems to notice or, if they do, care.

Not to be a Cassandra or make a prediction of the inevitability of our disUnion, but one must take such dangers seriously even if the probability is, say, only 10%, although it is probably higher than 10% at the moment. There are too many racial, religious, ideological, and economic conflicts between disparate groups of Americans, and now the Arab-Jewish conflict is coming to our shores! To even review in detail would be impossible without writing a book. Any one of these, saving perhaps the Arab-Jewish war that affects relatively few Americans (though it is quite dramatic, painful, and impactful to them!), could become explosive, and that explosion could cause an unintentional chain reaction.

The fact is that around 30% of Americans seem to love Trump, and among them, he has superstar almost godlike status (not literally but figuratively), and he is in a sense a messianic persona who will “make America great again.” But 30% of the country see him almost as the old line churches used to preach about the antichrist, a truly apocalyptic figure whose very presence in the American political scene threatens to reverse 100 years of real social progress, which still has a long way to go to be equitable and just.

(Note, the left has a “new man” ideology based on believing human nature is plastic and amenable to change in the right environment while the right has a “natural man” ideology based on adapting the environment to the existing and mostly unalterable human nature as it exists. These two ideologies are incompatible within a single sociocultural and socioeconomic system but could coexist within a vastly more decentralized and pluralistic Union.)

Most of those who love Trump and view any threats to him as threats against themselves tend to be more classical liberal in the sense of fiscal conservative, free market, and socially more libertine albeit within some traditional limits. Most of those who despise Trump tend toward a sort of free market socialism, if we can say such a thing exists, and are rather socially progressive to the degree of seeing those who are socially conservative as illegitimate and their views as unethical, bordering on criminal. But not everyone in either the “love Trump” or “hate Trump” camp falls in either of these categories.

As for the 40% in the middle, this is not a case of being indecisive. Their views are diverse but often definite. Perhaps 80% of the voting public have made up their mind about Donald Trump, and it is likely their views will not change.

This brings us to the dynamite sitting around in a hot room that we call the multiple prosecutions/persecutions of Trump via courts one tends to either see as virtuous and good or corrupt and evil. The strains on the fabric of our political Union are immense as the fabric of our political Union includes trust, respect, tolerance, and consent. Increasingly, both sides see the other as untrustworthy, disrespectful toward fellow Americans, intolerant, and acting outside the consent of the People. In other words, some 60% of the voting public deem the other side as totally illegitimate, and when they win office, all respect for the office goes away if your side didn’t win it.

If we apply that 40% of Democrats and Republicans who think the other side should be resisted with violence, that’s around 24% of the voting public who are already primed ideationally for what amounts to civil war: political violence aimed at the opposition. There are 24 million Americans leaning more and more toward the fringe on their respective sides.

Given either a scenario where Trump is thrown in jail or he is not, the side whose desires were not met will feel a deep sense of rage and betrayal at the system and the more fringe and unstable elements (which both sides shelter among themselves in their desperate search for allies) may begin to engage in political violence. While it is true, the FBI is wholly in the camp of the left and taking extreme measures to “monitor” the right, because the FBI leadership think 30% of Americans are illegitimate because they support Trump, their attention is rather parochial for the Democratic Party than for the integrity of the Union. In other words, the FBI are positive toward elements of the left who may become radicalized to violence if Trump isn’t sufficiently punished in their eyes while the people on the right they are focused on are so many in number, resources are spread too thin to catch the actual fringe elements on the right who may engage in violence.

Basically, as to the leftist fringe, the FBI are blinded by affection, and as to the right’s fringe the FBI monitoring regimen against the right is way too broad and spread too thin to catch the actual fringe. The FBI are hounding pro life activists, parents disgruntled by what they deem grooming of their children, and any conservative remotely connected to January 6, 2021 activities or who was merely in the vicinity of DC on or around that day. In truth, one wonders how human traffickers and mega drug dealers are being dealt with as the FBI turns its monstrous gaze inward at innocent civilians whose ideologies the mostly rabidly loyalists Democratic Party activists in their ranks deem as illegitimate just for existing.

Put more bluntly: the partisan bias of the FBI effectively blinds it from the threats of leftist or rightist fringe elements who could engage in political violence such as we have not seen since the Civil War. This doesn’t mean we will see a civil war, but compared to every major upheaval since the Civil War, this could be the largest even if it doesn’t trip into a second full-fledged civil war.

Trump’s prosecutors or persecutors, depending on your perspective, should take much cognizance of the consequences of how they engage in their efforts. Even if Trump is guilty, if the prosecution looks like persecution because it is patently unfair, or if it looks like the law is too rigorously applied to Trump while others go scott-free, then the temporary satisfaction of bringing Trump down will be replaced quickly by the sheer terror or major political violence and upheaval, perhaps from BOTH right and left fringe elements.

But to not prosecute Trump at all just because it will make people irate, if indeed he is guilty, would be a miscarriage of the Rule of law, hence the need to be equally vigorous about unethical and possibly criminal activities on the other side, of which serious and credible accusations have arisen.

On the other hand is Trump himself, who some may even suggest should consider bowing out and endorsing someone for the good of the country, albeit others will argue if he does that then lawfare will constantly be used to target Republicans knowing they will just bow out when targeted. It is not always true that bowing out is precedent for others, especially if you know maybe you strayed close enough to the edge of the law to raise legitimate concerns, but likewise merely bowing out may not solve the problem if lawfare is simple a tactic now employed by the left against the right.

This means that, even if Trump knows or sincerely believes he is innocent, there is no surefire response he can make for the good of the country as either bowing out or slugging it out could have unknown consequences.

But for his prosecutors/persecutors, depending on your perspective, there is a clear need for caution: to engage in a fair and open process with absolute transparency, to remove all conflicts of interest, and to ensure that the law is applied equally with regards accusations against the other side, e.g. the Biden family dealings. What one cannot see is caution, indeed the rhetoric of his prosecutors has mimicked the hardest and most militant leftwing fringe elements in their rhetoric, not only against Trump but his supporters as well, as if they would truly know whether or not he is guilty.

The blatant partisanship and the fact that the leading prosecutors all have shown reckless abandonment of any pretense of this not being an operation helmed by the DNC itself all bode ill for our country EVEN IF in one or more of these cases he is guilty. HOW one pursues rule of law, including the optics and how one addresses the supporters of the accused, is as important as applying the law to everyone regardless of office or status.

How we got here is a discussion for after we figure out how to navigate past these treacherous waters to safe harbor, and then, when the conflicts and rages have passed, we can ask how to prevent such a situation from happening again. We must preserve our Union and either protecting Trump from what you see as persecution or justly prosecuting his alleged crimes are not nearly as important as maintaining our political fabric and healing our divisions.

Even in the worst-case scenario, we would not predict with certainty that civil war must result, but we do well to warn ourselves of the very real possibility, even if it is the less likely of outcomes. We could see the left totally win as the right lays down, and this some form of leftist Caesarism or the right win and the left lay down, and thus we would see a rightist Caesarism. Or we could see a period of unrest followed by something that cools things off and causes calmer heads on both sides to reach a tolerable peace, this being probably the greatest of possibilities, but still not pleasant.

Due caution and concern should be engaged in and frank, closed-door meetings between the different sides aimed at cooling the political temperature should be ongoing and immediate. The consequences to the world if America falls from within would make World War Two look like a skirmish. Thus, the preservation of our Union, in any form, is, with a 100-year view, more tolerable than even having our political faction totally win if such “victory” undermines the Union.

While for us at the Freedomist liberty or death is an essential element of our ideas and while we may tend to think a Republican win is the least hazardous, for now, to our rights and prosperity, the urgency of preserving our Union for future generations is equally pressing. The ability to carve out gaps for freedom even if the authoritarians on either side have some ascendance for a time is equally urgent to these other considerations and may be the only aspect of preserving our Union that we who do not hold power can do. This applies to all of us, whether we count ourselves to right, to the left, or somewhere in between.

FOR ACCURATE coverage and unique perspectives, and to help us fund our staff and work in promoting a pro freedom message, please consider joining us as a paid subscriber to back our vision. CLICK HERE

BREAKING: New House Speaker Elected on First Vote – Mike Johnson Wins Unanimous GOP Support

Paul Collier October 25, 2023

Representative Mike Johnson (R-LA) was elected the next House Speaker to replace Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on the first vote, winning 100 percent of Republican votes, all 220, with Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) getting all DNC and Socialist votes, 209 in total. As the left refers to Johnson as a right winger, a pejorative intended to invoke accusations of “ism” and “phobia,” but is really code that means “this guy supports the American constitution,” that is a good sign Americans might not have a “Uniparty” Speaker like McCarthy, his predecessor, was/is.

Johnson also supported Donald Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 Mass Mailer election, a process the DNC-CCP and its media content marketers call “overturning an election,” an accusation that is only ever lobbed at “right wingers,” that is, Americans that support the constitution of the United States being Rule of Law over the woketarian ideology based on the unfounded and psychotically insane assumption that white people invented evil so we must destroy everything white people invented (starting with the Christian faith, then the American republic).

To his credit, he also voted against certifying the election, one of only 147 Republicans bold enough to do so. Their reason for not certifying the election should simply have been that you cannot have an open and transparent election using mass mailing as your primary means of voting. More than 60 percent of the votes cast in the 2020 election were by mass mailer, a crime that has yet to be rectified, a crime that starts with our courts, who abandoned their duty to uphold and defend the constitution for the sake of the DNC-CCP.

He is also a staunch pro-life supporter, so he seems to be consistently “socially conservative.” This writer is cautiously optimistic that this selection might give the GOP some incentive to start acting like a defiant opposition party to the DNC-CCP, a criminal organization that equates the Bill of Rights to Far-Rightism, a treasonous assumption when held by members of the government whose authority comes from that document.

Progmerican President Defends Students’ Right to Free Speech When They Say Leftist Things

Paul Collier October 24, 2023

The White House has come out to defend the rights of Americans to express dissent against the Israeli state and support for the Palestinians and/or Hamas. Some of these Americans even support the acts of terror committed by Hamas, justifying it with claims that Israel does the same. Having such a reprehensible position as defending true terror is still an American right and one this writer supports, but seeing the White House defend the right to free speech while it supports corporate economic executions of Americans who dare dissent against their policies, such as abortion and the “normalization” (which is a dog whistle for “forced preference and acceptance”) of homosexuality, makes their latest appeal to free-speech rights ring hollow.

Still, this writer echoes the sentiment of White House press Secretary Harine Jeane-Pierre when she said in support of Americans’ rights to express reprehensible views (not that supporting the Palestinians is reprehensible, it’s supporting Hamas that’s reprehensible), “I would just tell you that you don’t have to agree with every sentiment that is expressed in a country like this to stand by the First Amendment and the idea of peaceful protest…We’re always going to denounce antisemitism, but at the same time people have the right to peacefully protest.”

She’s conveniently American when its power can be used to support her side, but decidedly not when it comes to the rights of Americans to dissent against abortion or “gay rights” (which, again, aren’t “rights,” they are privileges, to create a class of people about which nothing “bad” can be said about them publicly without market or even state coercive powers being brought to bear to silence that dissent). It’s ok to hate the Jews publicly, but not the “people of color” or the LGBTQplusplusplus crowd.

Yet, this writer still supports the right of even Progmericans to voice dissent and to “peacefully,” not violently (as is more often the case when it comes to progmericans, who view true Americanism as a dog whistle for their boogeyman of all boogeymen that give them their “right” to murder their neighbors, white supremacism). Cancelling people from the market or from higher institutions of learning for having reprehensible views is very rarely representative of the American Rule of Law spirit.

It’s nice to see the Biden administration visiting American when it works in their favor. It would be even nicer if they stayed, but then they’d have to live with the consequences of action even if it doesn’t empower them to re-imagine America into the progmerican dream, where liberty dies in the name of “protecting the disenfranchised” as defined by the elite few who fund the vast majority of the machine the progmericans have built to destroy America from within.

America versus Progmerica in a Land Without God

Paul Collier October 24, 2023

“A lady asked Dr. Franklin, ‘well, Doctor, what have we got a republic or a monarchy?’ ‘A republic,’ replied the Doctor, ‘if you can keep it.’” – James McHenry, from his 1787 journal

The University of Virginia’s Center for Politics released a poll that shows 47 percent of Trump supporters and 51 percent of Biden supporters view the other side as the biggest threat to America. More troubling is the second part of that poll, which shows 41 percent of Biden supporters and 38 percent of Trump supporters believing violence is justified in stopping the other side. 31 percent of Trump supporters and 24 percent of Biden supporters question the “viability of democracy.”

The poll is skewed from the start in its selection of Biden supporters versus Trump supporters, as a sizeable proportion of American citizens will either vote for someone other than Biden or won’t vote at all, as they are completely disenfranchised with the whole political institution. Still, the poll is useful in reading the barometer of the times, “America” is a divided house, even if this poll fails to get to the root of what that division is.

The pollsters themselves reveal their leftist bias by using the phrase “viability of democracy,” with democracy being the key operating phrase. The American Communist Party regularly uses the term democracy in a positive way when “justifying” their own potential rise to power, so “democracy” in and of itself is a problematic phrase that is existentially at odds with the American republic.

A democracy comes in many forms, including what most people in America think of as a democracy, a representative government selected through free and open elections. But democracies can be totalitarian, with one-party states that outlaw all other parties, with the party in power claiming it has the mandate, or at least the best interests, of the people. Therefore, it can rule in their interest to make it the best it can possibly be for the orthodox members of society (the people willing to conform to the will of the state, for the good of the whole).

America, under its validity of rule, its Declaration of Independence (the first and foremost source for the legitimization of our government’s right to rule) and its Constitution, is a limited-power Republic in which one branch of government is representative and selected through allegedly free and open elections. The limits placed on government by the Constitution, and the deputization by the Declaration of Independence of the people in times when government does not act with Constitutionally-defined restraint makes us a republic, not a democracy.

We are not ruled by the majority, but rather, we are ruled by restraint, and empowered to BE the authority in times when that elected body and its appointees (be it judicial or executive appointment) violate the source of their right to rule.

A democracy is the mob led by the few to oppress the few. A republic respects the inherent rights of individuals not to be violated, even by the mob, whether that mob emerged organically from the bottom up or (as is almost ALWAYS the case) was manipulated from the top down to create the desired spirit the few find useful to their parochial interests.

The pollsters themselves reveal the two nations this land now occupies, nations that are so entangled they can both exist in the same household.

On one side is the progmerican, the individual who thinks of “America” as a Democracy and doesn’t feel so constrained by our Constitution, our Declaration of Independence. This individual thinks like one who denies the sacredness, the sovereignty, the stewardship of the individual and imagines (whether they realize it or not) that the world can and should be FORCED to be like them, to think like them, where dissent is called “mis/disinformation” or “hate speech,” and laws are supported that would criminalize such beliefs when they are publicly shared or publicly known.

The progmerican does not value the individual unless that individual conforms to a specific set of values that are ultimately defined by the “experts,” the de facto oligarchy of the land (until one charismatic power arises that can make himself or herself the beginning and end of the law in the land).

On the other side is the American, the individual who values the sacredness, the sovereignty, and the stewardship of the individual, and accepts the restraints on government as defined by our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, viewing the adherence to those documents as the legitimization of power, not the majority rule without restraint that “Democrats” envision.

The division between Trump and Biden supporters isn’t so clean, though, as plenty of Biden supporters do so out of a lack of belief that the Democratic Party is not American in nature and seeks to ultimately, definitively, end any vestige of Rule of Law as defined by our two documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. On the other side, plenty of Trump supporters end up supporting hate speech and disinformation criminalization, as we can see in the support for the censoring of Americans who dare support the Palestinians over Israel.

Neither party has demonstrated in deed any real commitment to the Rule of Law in America, with the Republican Party only being willing to use the language of the American Rule of Law to appeal for power authorization. Once they get that power, they consistently fail to address the open violations of that Rule of Law by their frenemy, the Democratic Party. Let us hope our new Speaker of the House is part of a process that is about to change that current reality.

There are two nations forming, with smaller ones nipping at both their borders, and neither nation makes God their first source of wisdom within our American republican framework. This is where the call to violence appeals to more and more people, as both sides find it increasingly hard to humanize the other side without the Holy Spirit-led conviction to do as Christ commands us, to love our enemies.

“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” – John 13:34-35

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? “ – Matthew 5:43-47

In a land without God, a land filled with nations that are existentially opposed to one another, the only hope for peace is a shared belief in the Lord of Lords, the God of Abraham, Jacob, and Isaac, who sent His Only Son to save us by grace alone lest we should boast. Unless and until Americans repent and turn to the sacredness of the individual, made in God’s image, then “Americans” will show no grace, no mercy to their enemies, and Progmericans will only grow bolder in their open defiance of the American contract that gives government in this land the “right” to Rule, our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.

Rainbow Fascists and Islamo-Fascists Clash on the Streets of London

Paul Collier October 23, 2023

It seems the child-murder, groomer, rapist gang, the rainbow fascists, might not be so welcome by the other death cult these reprobate minds embrace, the Islamo-fascists, who they cheer on every time they “rally” in support of Hamas.

A march supporting the child-murdering, raping death cult of Hamas in London has revealed the rift between the rainbow fascists and the Islamo-fascists marching “side by side.” Rainbow flags flying in support of Hamas are not something Hamas and its debased supporters endorse, as was evidenced by the taking down of the flags and the flag bearers by Muslims dressed in black during the march.

The march happened October 21, 2023, on the streets of London. It revealed the murderous nature of everyone involved, the rainbow fascists pushing a lifestyle that, if society prefers it (as they want seem to want to force society to do so) will lead to the death of humanity, and the Islamists, who embrace a religion that calls on its devotees to murder the unbeliever, especially the Jew, to bring the end of the world and the ushering in of their version of paradise (where 72 virgins are forced to have sex with one devotee who murdered his way to sexual paradise).

From Express UK: “… a video widely shared on social media appears to show uneasiness and lack of unity among some of the factions attending the event.

The clip, filmed in Trafalgar Square where the “March For Palestine” ended, initially shows a Progressive Pride Flag being waved.

Shortly after, the flag representing the LGBTQ+ community can be seen falling to the ground.

As people surrounded the flag bearer, it isn’t clear whether the person waving it was attacked or if someone grabbed the symbol of inclusivity to tear it down.

Then, two men dressed in black and with their face covered can be seen running away from Nelson’s column.

Shortly before the video ends, a skirmish breaks out between the men and another protester, who appears to be holding a sign.”

ED.NOTE: Not all homosexuals are rainbow fascists, and the majority of rainbow fascists are not gay.

Colorado School Becomes Gay Propaganda Recruitment Center

Paul Collier October 23, 2023

A mother shared videos her son secretly took of his public school in Colorado that showed a school COVERED in “Gay Pride” rainbow flags and pro-gay posters, making one think the school is more concerned about selling homosexuality than it is educating children to be stewards of their own lives. The mother expressed her son’s frustration, and those of many of his friends who are sick to death of going to school every day and essentially being encouraged to be gay. The mother used the anonymous twitter handle @wildfirewhispers and kept her son’s name and the name of the school anonymous, though it is only a matter of time before the rainbow fascists locate the school and begin spewing death threats at anyone who dares oppose the “gay agenda.”

America’s founding principle is, at its core, “live and let live,” or “mind your own business,” however you want to phrase it. This principle is what the gay community used to appeal to the rest of America when they DEMANDED they have the SAME rights as heterosexuals to marry, receiving all the benefits that state-sanctioned marriage brings with it.

Most of America was perfectly fine with that and most supported the 2015 decision that gave the gay community what it wanted. But now, we see the gay community seems to be revealing the truth of Romans 1, “And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips…” Romans 1:28-29

Many at the time of the ruling claimed legalizing gay marriage would lead to the spread of pedophilia and the debasement of marriage, and they were ridiculed for using what was called the “slipper slope” fallacy. As it turns out, the slippery slope is real, and this school has become the poster child for that debasement, that giving over to evil thoughts, where good is evil and evil is good.

Legalizing gay marriage might not be the heart of the problem, but then again, it might, and at this time, this writer believes more and more Americans might come to the conclusion that gay marriage, that embracing homosexuality, is a cancer to the rest of America. The only people who benefit from this militant gay fascism are homosexuals, less than 3 percent of our society, who have created, and are creating an apartheid state where the minority rules with oppression and violence over the majority.

This writer believes gay marriage can be legal and yet the state, the corporations won’t, or at least don’t need to, become nothing but constant pro-gay propaganda machines, debasing heterosexuality, the sexual binary reality, families, and pregnancy. As homosexual “rights” (which are really privileges at this point) rise, the debasement of the rest of humanity at the end of the government gun also rises. It will be difficult to hold on to our live and let live founding principle in the wake of the militancy the gay community has demonstrated, as reflected in this pedo-enabling school where children are sexualized daily in the name of making homosexuals feel safe and welcome.

Here is the full post by the mother whose son is done with the rainbow fascists:

My son is 13. He’s in 8th grade.

He, like many kids his age, has been wary of taking a “stand” against this… has just tried to tolerate it all, hoping it will pass with the next semester… or the next… or the next… but it never does.

So, he came home yesterday and told me he’d taken some pictures and videos of the things around his school. That it’s EVERYWHERE, and he wanted us to see.

He knows how I feel, but I always tell him… it’s not his fight. It’s ours to change, for them. I do my best not to put it on his or his sister’s shoulders, and just let them live.

But, yesterday, he told us that he really wanted to show us it all.

He said, between all of this, and active shooter drills, and the way kids are not controlled in class AT ALL… they barely have any ACTUAL learning time.

This was a video he discreetly took in class yesterday, and pictures of things he wanted us to see around his school and classrooms.

He wanted us to see it all. And he told me it was ok for me to share with y’all, because he wants a change. His friends do too.

(I’ve blanked out kids artwork, names of them and teachers, etc. For their privacy.)

These kids WANT our help.

Let’s make damn sure they get it.

My son is 13. He’s in 8th grade.

He, like many kids his age, has been wary of taking a “stand” against this… has just tried to tolerate it all, hoping it will pass with the next semester… or the next… or the next… but it never does.

So, he came home yesterday and told me… https://t.co/QxlCcBBRAq pic.twitter.com/BtOcxnLJcK

— Wildfire Whispers (@WildfireWhisper) October 18, 2023

For a better understanding of our standards of news reporting, read our report “The Prophetic Voice in News?”

Front