White House Moves to Mold A.I in its Anti-American Image

Paul Collier October 31, 2023

The Biden White House will use the King’s decree, an Executive Order, to attempt to mold AI in its dark, anti-American, anti-human image, announcing plans to create a sweeping executive order that will bypass the legislative process, giving, ostensibly, a demented old man the power to dictate to the country the terms of its AI use.

The order is justified by White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, who reveals his anti-Americanism in his very speech. He said “Given the pace of this technology, we can’t move in normal government or private-sector pace, we have to move fast, really fast – ideally faster than the technology itself. You have to continue to be proactive, anticipate where things are headed, continue to act fast and pull every lever we can.”

Normal government pace is the standard of our constitutional republic, which this White House is working diligently to destroy. Whether it’s fear of the white race, or man-made climate change, or, now AI, the White House will trot out any monster it can to terrorize Americans to fear so much for their safety they’re willing to surrender their American constitutional liberty to the demagogues behind the manipulation of reality that led them to that fear in the first place.

To be sure, God will use this regime in part to check some aspects of AI that should be checked. No matter how hard Satan and those who knowingly or unknowingly follow his agenda (to lead humanity to suicide), God will turn what they meant for evil into good. So not all aspects of whatever this god-like executive order contains will even be opposed by this writer, or, I would wager, you, the American reader.

Still, one must be vigilant not to be conformed to this world, not to be conditioned to accept the precedent this executive order hopes to create, empowering the President to create legislation without going through congress as our Constitution demands, thus undermining the Constitution’s actual power in the minds of anyone that blindly cedes such power to this demented old man in the name of fear.

From ktvz.com:

The executive order, which Biden will unveil at an event Monday, is sweeping in scope. It will require developers of powerful AI systems to share results of their safety tests with the federal government before they are released to the public.

If an AI model being developed poses national security, economic or health risks, the order will compel companies to notify the federal government under the Defense Production Act.

The action will also ease immigration barriers for workers skilled in critical areas of AI to study and stay in the US; establish standards to prevent AI production of dangerous biological materials; and develop best practices to minimize the risk of AI displacing human workers.

The order aims to prevent AI-related fraud by directing the Commerce Department to develop guidance for watermarking AI-generated content.

And it will spell out government use of AI, including standards for safety but also measures to help agencies acquire new technology that could increase efficiency or cut costs.

It should be noted that nowhere does the writer of this article even raise the flag on how dangerous it is to leave such a critical issue as how a nation is to govern such a powerful tool, that is as dangerous as it is filled with opportunity, in the pen of one doddering old man, or any one person, in an action that, if the American people accept it, kills the letter and spirit of our constitution.

The GOP-led House should, at the very least, pass resolutions declaring this action to be an overt violation of the Rule of Law, and for that reason alone should immediately impeach this President and any official connected to it that congress has the power to impeach.

The far-left has proven they are willing to build their hateful ideology into every institution they can, and AI will be no different. They hope to control this tool to control resistance to the Satanic cause they serve, the elimination of the human species from the face of the planet, even if they don’t fully, or even remotely, understand or believe they are doing.

The Walls Are Closing In On Trump and Our Union

Bill Collier October 27, 2023

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump, 45th President of these United States of America, but, what few of his persecutors or prosecutors (depending on your perspective) realize is that this also shows that the walls are closing in on the very existence of our Union as a single country. As every day brings new setbacks for Trump’s legal defense, and as once staunch allies cover themselves by sacrificing him to the altars of Democrats in high dudgeon, the very substance of our Union weakens.

THIS IS NOT A COMMENTARY on Trump, on his guilt or innocence, or anything like that. It is an analysis of the potential impacts to the strength of our Union which follow the possible scenarios that may unfold.

Let’s cover the diverse perspectives.

You may think Trump is guilty and should be punished like anyone else would be. You may think he is guilty but also think his opponents are also coloring outside the legal lines and wonder why the law isn’t being equally applied. You may think Trump may have veered close to the legal line and didn’t cross it, but his opponents are using it against him while covering up their own actual crimes. You may think Trump is innocent, and this is a witch hunt, a totally political persecution, lawfare. Beyond these perspectives, there are shades in between as well, filled with nuance.

The legal question is “guilty or not guilty.”

If you think Trump is guilty and knows it, then you are frustrated he hasn’t just admitted it and backed out of his bid for a second term for the good of the country. What appalls you about your fellow citizens and divides you from them is how so many could be conned into following an obviously bad person.

If you think Trump is innocent, or not guilty, you look at the Biden administration and the bureaucrats in DC and wonder why they don’t, for the good of the country, disengage and disavow the lawfare and play ball fairly. What appalls you about your fellow citizens is how so many could be OK with such an obvious abuse of power knowing they can’t win on an even playing field.

Perhaps the truth doesn’t easily fit those two perspectives and perhaps one might ask a deeper question of both sides: how seriously are they taking the repercussions of their actions in light of the threat to our political fabric? When we see something like around 40% of Republicans and Democrats saying that force should be used against the other side we are hearing the klaxon of chaos and ruin approaching but nobody seems to notice or, if they do, care.

Not to be a Cassandra or make a prediction of the inevitability of our disUnion, but one must take such dangers seriously even if the probability is, say, only 10%, although it is probably higher than 10% at the moment. There are too many racial, religious, ideological, and economic conflicts between disparate groups of Americans, and now the Arab-Jewish conflict is coming to our shores! To even review in detail would be impossible without writing a book. Any one of these, saving perhaps the Arab-Jewish war that affects relatively few Americans (though it is quite dramatic, painful, and impactful to them!), could become explosive, and that explosion could cause an unintentional chain reaction.

The fact is that around 30% of Americans seem to love Trump, and among them, he has superstar almost godlike status (not literally but figuratively), and he is in a sense a messianic persona who will “make America great again.” But 30% of the country see him almost as the old line churches used to preach about the antichrist, a truly apocalyptic figure whose very presence in the American political scene threatens to reverse 100 years of real social progress, which still has a long way to go to be equitable and just.

(Note, the left has a “new man” ideology based on believing human nature is plastic and amenable to change in the right environment while the right has a “natural man” ideology based on adapting the environment to the existing and mostly unalterable human nature as it exists. These two ideologies are incompatible within a single sociocultural and socioeconomic system but could coexist within a vastly more decentralized and pluralistic Union.)

Most of those who love Trump and view any threats to him as threats against themselves tend to be more classical liberal in the sense of fiscal conservative, free market, and socially more libertine albeit within some traditional limits. Most of those who despise Trump tend toward a sort of free market socialism, if we can say such a thing exists, and are rather socially progressive to the degree of seeing those who are socially conservative as illegitimate and their views as unethical, bordering on criminal. But not everyone in either the “love Trump” or “hate Trump” camp falls in either of these categories.

As for the 40% in the middle, this is not a case of being indecisive. Their views are diverse but often definite. Perhaps 80% of the voting public have made up their mind about Donald Trump, and it is likely their views will not change.

This brings us to the dynamite sitting around in a hot room that we call the multiple prosecutions/persecutions of Trump via courts one tends to either see as virtuous and good or corrupt and evil. The strains on the fabric of our political Union are immense as the fabric of our political Union includes trust, respect, tolerance, and consent. Increasingly, both sides see the other as untrustworthy, disrespectful toward fellow Americans, intolerant, and acting outside the consent of the People. In other words, some 60% of the voting public deem the other side as totally illegitimate, and when they win office, all respect for the office goes away if your side didn’t win it.

If we apply that 40% of Democrats and Republicans who think the other side should be resisted with violence, that’s around 24% of the voting public who are already primed ideationally for what amounts to civil war: political violence aimed at the opposition. There are 24 million Americans leaning more and more toward the fringe on their respective sides.

Given either a scenario where Trump is thrown in jail or he is not, the side whose desires were not met will feel a deep sense of rage and betrayal at the system and the more fringe and unstable elements (which both sides shelter among themselves in their desperate search for allies) may begin to engage in political violence. While it is true, the FBI is wholly in the camp of the left and taking extreme measures to “monitor” the right, because the FBI leadership think 30% of Americans are illegitimate because they support Trump, their attention is rather parochial for the Democratic Party than for the integrity of the Union. In other words, the FBI are positive toward elements of the left who may become radicalized to violence if Trump isn’t sufficiently punished in their eyes while the people on the right they are focused on are so many in number, resources are spread too thin to catch the actual fringe elements on the right who may engage in violence.

Basically, as to the leftist fringe, the FBI are blinded by affection, and as to the right’s fringe the FBI monitoring regimen against the right is way too broad and spread too thin to catch the actual fringe. The FBI are hounding pro life activists, parents disgruntled by what they deem grooming of their children, and any conservative remotely connected to January 6, 2021 activities or who was merely in the vicinity of DC on or around that day. In truth, one wonders how human traffickers and mega drug dealers are being dealt with as the FBI turns its monstrous gaze inward at innocent civilians whose ideologies the mostly rabidly loyalists Democratic Party activists in their ranks deem as illegitimate just for existing.

Put more bluntly: the partisan bias of the FBI effectively blinds it from the threats of leftist or rightist fringe elements who could engage in political violence such as we have not seen since the Civil War. This doesn’t mean we will see a civil war, but compared to every major upheaval since the Civil War, this could be the largest even if it doesn’t trip into a second full-fledged civil war.

Trump’s prosecutors or persecutors, depending on your perspective, should take much cognizance of the consequences of how they engage in their efforts. Even if Trump is guilty, if the prosecution looks like persecution because it is patently unfair, or if it looks like the law is too rigorously applied to Trump while others go scott-free, then the temporary satisfaction of bringing Trump down will be replaced quickly by the sheer terror or major political violence and upheaval, perhaps from BOTH right and left fringe elements.

But to not prosecute Trump at all just because it will make people irate, if indeed he is guilty, would be a miscarriage of the Rule of law, hence the need to be equally vigorous about unethical and possibly criminal activities on the other side, of which serious and credible accusations have arisen.

On the other hand is Trump himself, who some may even suggest should consider bowing out and endorsing someone for the good of the country, albeit others will argue if he does that then lawfare will constantly be used to target Republicans knowing they will just bow out when targeted. It is not always true that bowing out is precedent for others, especially if you know maybe you strayed close enough to the edge of the law to raise legitimate concerns, but likewise merely bowing out may not solve the problem if lawfare is simple a tactic now employed by the left against the right.

This means that, even if Trump knows or sincerely believes he is innocent, there is no surefire response he can make for the good of the country as either bowing out or slugging it out could have unknown consequences.

But for his prosecutors/persecutors, depending on your perspective, there is a clear need for caution: to engage in a fair and open process with absolute transparency, to remove all conflicts of interest, and to ensure that the law is applied equally with regards accusations against the other side, e.g. the Biden family dealings. What one cannot see is caution, indeed the rhetoric of his prosecutors has mimicked the hardest and most militant leftwing fringe elements in their rhetoric, not only against Trump but his supporters as well, as if they would truly know whether or not he is guilty.

The blatant partisanship and the fact that the leading prosecutors all have shown reckless abandonment of any pretense of this not being an operation helmed by the DNC itself all bode ill for our country EVEN IF in one or more of these cases he is guilty. HOW one pursues rule of law, including the optics and how one addresses the supporters of the accused, is as important as applying the law to everyone regardless of office or status.

How we got here is a discussion for after we figure out how to navigate past these treacherous waters to safe harbor, and then, when the conflicts and rages have passed, we can ask how to prevent such a situation from happening again. We must preserve our Union and either protecting Trump from what you see as persecution or justly prosecuting his alleged crimes are not nearly as important as maintaining our political fabric and healing our divisions.

Even in the worst-case scenario, we would not predict with certainty that civil war must result, but we do well to warn ourselves of the very real possibility, even if it is the less likely of outcomes. We could see the left totally win as the right lays down, and this some form of leftist Caesarism or the right win and the left lay down, and thus we would see a rightist Caesarism. Or we could see a period of unrest followed by something that cools things off and causes calmer heads on both sides to reach a tolerable peace, this being probably the greatest of possibilities, but still not pleasant.

Due caution and concern should be engaged in and frank, closed-door meetings between the different sides aimed at cooling the political temperature should be ongoing and immediate. The consequences to the world if America falls from within would make World War Two look like a skirmish. Thus, the preservation of our Union, in any form, is, with a 100-year view, more tolerable than even having our political faction totally win if such “victory” undermines the Union.

While for us at the Freedomist liberty or death is an essential element of our ideas and while we may tend to think a Republican win is the least hazardous, for now, to our rights and prosperity, the urgency of preserving our Union for future generations is equally pressing. The ability to carve out gaps for freedom even if the authoritarians on either side have some ascendance for a time is equally urgent to these other considerations and may be the only aspect of preserving our Union that we who do not hold power can do. This applies to all of us, whether we count ourselves to right, to the left, or somewhere in between.

FOR ACCURATE coverage and unique perspectives, and to help us fund our staff and work in promoting a pro freedom message, please consider joining us as a paid subscriber to back our vision. CLICK HERE

BREAKING: New House Speaker Elected on First Vote – Mike Johnson Wins Unanimous GOP Support

Paul Collier October 25, 2023

Representative Mike Johnson (R-LA) was elected the next House Speaker to replace Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on the first vote, winning 100 percent of Republican votes, all 220, with Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) getting all DNC and Socialist votes, 209 in total. As the left refers to Johnson as a right winger, a pejorative intended to invoke accusations of “ism” and “phobia,” but is really code that means “this guy supports the American constitution,” that is a good sign Americans might not have a “Uniparty” Speaker like McCarthy, his predecessor, was/is.

Johnson also supported Donald Trump’s efforts to challenge the 2020 Mass Mailer election, a process the DNC-CCP and its media content marketers call “overturning an election,” an accusation that is only ever lobbed at “right wingers,” that is, Americans that support the constitution of the United States being Rule of Law over the woketarian ideology based on the unfounded and psychotically insane assumption that white people invented evil so we must destroy everything white people invented (starting with the Christian faith, then the American republic).

To his credit, he also voted against certifying the election, one of only 147 Republicans bold enough to do so. Their reason for not certifying the election should simply have been that you cannot have an open and transparent election using mass mailing as your primary means of voting. More than 60 percent of the votes cast in the 2020 election were by mass mailer, a crime that has yet to be rectified, a crime that starts with our courts, who abandoned their duty to uphold and defend the constitution for the sake of the DNC-CCP.

He is also a staunch pro-life supporter, so he seems to be consistently “socially conservative.” This writer is cautiously optimistic that this selection might give the GOP some incentive to start acting like a defiant opposition party to the DNC-CCP, a criminal organization that equates the Bill of Rights to Far-Rightism, a treasonous assumption when held by members of the government whose authority comes from that document.

Progmerican President Defends Students’ Right to Free Speech When They Say Leftist Things

Paul Collier October 24, 2023

The White House has come out to defend the rights of Americans to express dissent against the Israeli state and support for the Palestinians and/or Hamas. Some of these Americans even support the acts of terror committed by Hamas, justifying it with claims that Israel does the same. Having such a reprehensible position as defending true terror is still an American right and one this writer supports, but seeing the White House defend the right to free speech while it supports corporate economic executions of Americans who dare dissent against their policies, such as abortion and the “normalization” (which is a dog whistle for “forced preference and acceptance”) of homosexuality, makes their latest appeal to free-speech rights ring hollow.

Still, this writer echoes the sentiment of White House press Secretary Harine Jeane-Pierre when she said in support of Americans’ rights to express reprehensible views (not that supporting the Palestinians is reprehensible, it’s supporting Hamas that’s reprehensible), “I would just tell you that you don’t have to agree with every sentiment that is expressed in a country like this to stand by the First Amendment and the idea of peaceful protest…We’re always going to denounce antisemitism, but at the same time people have the right to peacefully protest.”

She’s conveniently American when its power can be used to support her side, but decidedly not when it comes to the rights of Americans to dissent against abortion or “gay rights” (which, again, aren’t “rights,” they are privileges, to create a class of people about which nothing “bad” can be said about them publicly without market or even state coercive powers being brought to bear to silence that dissent). It’s ok to hate the Jews publicly, but not the “people of color” or the LGBTQplusplusplus crowd.

Yet, this writer still supports the right of even Progmericans to voice dissent and to “peacefully,” not violently (as is more often the case when it comes to progmericans, who view true Americanism as a dog whistle for their boogeyman of all boogeymen that give them their “right” to murder their neighbors, white supremacism). Cancelling people from the market or from higher institutions of learning for having reprehensible views is very rarely representative of the American Rule of Law spirit.

It’s nice to see the Biden administration visiting American when it works in their favor. It would be even nicer if they stayed, but then they’d have to live with the consequences of action even if it doesn’t empower them to re-imagine America into the progmerican dream, where liberty dies in the name of “protecting the disenfranchised” as defined by the elite few who fund the vast majority of the machine the progmericans have built to destroy America from within.

America versus Progmerica in a Land Without God

Paul Collier October 24, 2023

“A lady asked Dr. Franklin, ‘well, Doctor, what have we got a republic or a monarchy?’ ‘A republic,’ replied the Doctor, ‘if you can keep it.’” – James McHenry, from his 1787 journal

The University of Virginia’s Center for Politics released a poll that shows 47 percent of Trump supporters and 51 percent of Biden supporters view the other side as the biggest threat to America. More troubling is the second part of that poll, which shows 41 percent of Biden supporters and 38 percent of Trump supporters believing violence is justified in stopping the other side. 31 percent of Trump supporters and 24 percent of Biden supporters question the “viability of democracy.”

The poll is skewed from the start in its selection of Biden supporters versus Trump supporters, as a sizeable proportion of American citizens will either vote for someone other than Biden or won’t vote at all, as they are completely disenfranchised with the whole political institution. Still, the poll is useful in reading the barometer of the times, “America” is a divided house, even if this poll fails to get to the root of what that division is.

The pollsters themselves reveal their leftist bias by using the phrase “viability of democracy,” with democracy being the key operating phrase. The American Communist Party regularly uses the term democracy in a positive way when “justifying” their own potential rise to power, so “democracy” in and of itself is a problematic phrase that is existentially at odds with the American republic.

A democracy comes in many forms, including what most people in America think of as a democracy, a representative government selected through free and open elections. But democracies can be totalitarian, with one-party states that outlaw all other parties, with the party in power claiming it has the mandate, or at least the best interests, of the people. Therefore, it can rule in their interest to make it the best it can possibly be for the orthodox members of society (the people willing to conform to the will of the state, for the good of the whole).

America, under its validity of rule, its Declaration of Independence (the first and foremost source for the legitimization of our government’s right to rule) and its Constitution, is a limited-power Republic in which one branch of government is representative and selected through allegedly free and open elections. The limits placed on government by the Constitution, and the deputization by the Declaration of Independence of the people in times when government does not act with Constitutionally-defined restraint makes us a republic, not a democracy.

We are not ruled by the majority, but rather, we are ruled by restraint, and empowered to BE the authority in times when that elected body and its appointees (be it judicial or executive appointment) violate the source of their right to rule.

A democracy is the mob led by the few to oppress the few. A republic respects the inherent rights of individuals not to be violated, even by the mob, whether that mob emerged organically from the bottom up or (as is almost ALWAYS the case) was manipulated from the top down to create the desired spirit the few find useful to their parochial interests.

The pollsters themselves reveal the two nations this land now occupies, nations that are so entangled they can both exist in the same household.

On one side is the progmerican, the individual who thinks of “America” as a Democracy and doesn’t feel so constrained by our Constitution, our Declaration of Independence. This individual thinks like one who denies the sacredness, the sovereignty, the stewardship of the individual and imagines (whether they realize it or not) that the world can and should be FORCED to be like them, to think like them, where dissent is called “mis/disinformation” or “hate speech,” and laws are supported that would criminalize such beliefs when they are publicly shared or publicly known.

The progmerican does not value the individual unless that individual conforms to a specific set of values that are ultimately defined by the “experts,” the de facto oligarchy of the land (until one charismatic power arises that can make himself or herself the beginning and end of the law in the land).

On the other side is the American, the individual who values the sacredness, the sovereignty, and the stewardship of the individual, and accepts the restraints on government as defined by our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution, viewing the adherence to those documents as the legitimization of power, not the majority rule without restraint that “Democrats” envision.

The division between Trump and Biden supporters isn’t so clean, though, as plenty of Biden supporters do so out of a lack of belief that the Democratic Party is not American in nature and seeks to ultimately, definitively, end any vestige of Rule of Law as defined by our two documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. On the other side, plenty of Trump supporters end up supporting hate speech and disinformation criminalization, as we can see in the support for the censoring of Americans who dare support the Palestinians over Israel.

Neither party has demonstrated in deed any real commitment to the Rule of Law in America, with the Republican Party only being willing to use the language of the American Rule of Law to appeal for power authorization. Once they get that power, they consistently fail to address the open violations of that Rule of Law by their frenemy, the Democratic Party. Let us hope our new Speaker of the House is part of a process that is about to change that current reality.

There are two nations forming, with smaller ones nipping at both their borders, and neither nation makes God their first source of wisdom within our American republican framework. This is where the call to violence appeals to more and more people, as both sides find it increasingly hard to humanize the other side without the Holy Spirit-led conviction to do as Christ commands us, to love our enemies.

“A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” – John 13:34-35

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? “ – Matthew 5:43-47

In a land without God, a land filled with nations that are existentially opposed to one another, the only hope for peace is a shared belief in the Lord of Lords, the God of Abraham, Jacob, and Isaac, who sent His Only Son to save us by grace alone lest we should boast. Unless and until Americans repent and turn to the sacredness of the individual, made in God’s image, then “Americans” will show no grace, no mercy to their enemies, and Progmericans will only grow bolder in their open defiance of the American contract that gives government in this land the “right” to Rule, our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution.

Rainbow Fascists and Islamo-Fascists Clash on the Streets of London

Paul Collier October 23, 2023

It seems the child-murder, groomer, rapist gang, the rainbow fascists, might not be so welcome by the other death cult these reprobate minds embrace, the Islamo-fascists, who they cheer on every time they “rally” in support of Hamas.

A march supporting the child-murdering, raping death cult of Hamas in London has revealed the rift between the rainbow fascists and the Islamo-fascists marching “side by side.” Rainbow flags flying in support of Hamas are not something Hamas and its debased supporters endorse, as was evidenced by the taking down of the flags and the flag bearers by Muslims dressed in black during the march.

The march happened October 21, 2023, on the streets of London. It revealed the murderous nature of everyone involved, the rainbow fascists pushing a lifestyle that, if society prefers it (as they want seem to want to force society to do so) will lead to the death of humanity, and the Islamists, who embrace a religion that calls on its devotees to murder the unbeliever, especially the Jew, to bring the end of the world and the ushering in of their version of paradise (where 72 virgins are forced to have sex with one devotee who murdered his way to sexual paradise).

From Express UK: “… a video widely shared on social media appears to show uneasiness and lack of unity among some of the factions attending the event.

The clip, filmed in Trafalgar Square where the “March For Palestine” ended, initially shows a Progressive Pride Flag being waved.

Shortly after, the flag representing the LGBTQ+ community can be seen falling to the ground.

As people surrounded the flag bearer, it isn’t clear whether the person waving it was attacked or if someone grabbed the symbol of inclusivity to tear it down.

Then, two men dressed in black and with their face covered can be seen running away from Nelson’s column.

Shortly before the video ends, a skirmish breaks out between the men and another protester, who appears to be holding a sign.”

ED.NOTE: Not all homosexuals are rainbow fascists, and the majority of rainbow fascists are not gay.

Colorado School Becomes Gay Propaganda Recruitment Center

Paul Collier October 23, 2023

A mother shared videos her son secretly took of his public school in Colorado that showed a school COVERED in “Gay Pride” rainbow flags and pro-gay posters, making one think the school is more concerned about selling homosexuality than it is educating children to be stewards of their own lives. The mother expressed her son’s frustration, and those of many of his friends who are sick to death of going to school every day and essentially being encouraged to be gay. The mother used the anonymous twitter handle @wildfirewhispers and kept her son’s name and the name of the school anonymous, though it is only a matter of time before the rainbow fascists locate the school and begin spewing death threats at anyone who dares oppose the “gay agenda.”

America’s founding principle is, at its core, “live and let live,” or “mind your own business,” however you want to phrase it. This principle is what the gay community used to appeal to the rest of America when they DEMANDED they have the SAME rights as heterosexuals to marry, receiving all the benefits that state-sanctioned marriage brings with it.

Most of America was perfectly fine with that and most supported the 2015 decision that gave the gay community what it wanted. But now, we see the gay community seems to be revealing the truth of Romans 1, “And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips…” Romans 1:28-29

Many at the time of the ruling claimed legalizing gay marriage would lead to the spread of pedophilia and the debasement of marriage, and they were ridiculed for using what was called the “slipper slope” fallacy. As it turns out, the slippery slope is real, and this school has become the poster child for that debasement, that giving over to evil thoughts, where good is evil and evil is good.

Legalizing gay marriage might not be the heart of the problem, but then again, it might, and at this time, this writer believes more and more Americans might come to the conclusion that gay marriage, that embracing homosexuality, is a cancer to the rest of America. The only people who benefit from this militant gay fascism are homosexuals, less than 3 percent of our society, who have created, and are creating an apartheid state where the minority rules with oppression and violence over the majority.

This writer believes gay marriage can be legal and yet the state, the corporations won’t, or at least don’t need to, become nothing but constant pro-gay propaganda machines, debasing heterosexuality, the sexual binary reality, families, and pregnancy. As homosexual “rights” (which are really privileges at this point) rise, the debasement of the rest of humanity at the end of the government gun also rises. It will be difficult to hold on to our live and let live founding principle in the wake of the militancy the gay community has demonstrated, as reflected in this pedo-enabling school where children are sexualized daily in the name of making homosexuals feel safe and welcome.

Here is the full post by the mother whose son is done with the rainbow fascists:

My son is 13. He’s in 8th grade.

He, like many kids his age, has been wary of taking a “stand” against this… has just tried to tolerate it all, hoping it will pass with the next semester… or the next… or the next… but it never does.

So, he came home yesterday and told me he’d taken some pictures and videos of the things around his school. That it’s EVERYWHERE, and he wanted us to see.

He knows how I feel, but I always tell him… it’s not his fight. It’s ours to change, for them. I do my best not to put it on his or his sister’s shoulders, and just let them live.

But, yesterday, he told us that he really wanted to show us it all.

He said, between all of this, and active shooter drills, and the way kids are not controlled in class AT ALL… they barely have any ACTUAL learning time.

This was a video he discreetly took in class yesterday, and pictures of things he wanted us to see around his school and classrooms.

He wanted us to see it all. And he told me it was ok for me to share with y’all, because he wants a change. His friends do too.

(I’ve blanked out kids artwork, names of them and teachers, etc. For their privacy.)

These kids WANT our help.

Let’s make damn sure they get it.

My son is 13. He’s in 8th grade.

He, like many kids his age, has been wary of taking a “stand” against this… has just tried to tolerate it all, hoping it will pass with the next semester… or the next… or the next… but it never does.

So, he came home yesterday and told me… https://t.co/QxlCcBBRAq pic.twitter.com/BtOcxnLJcK

— Wildfire Whispers (@WildfireWhisper) October 18, 2023

For a better understanding of our standards of news reporting, read our report “The Prophetic Voice in News?”

Bloomberg Wants to Kill America’s Power, Literally

Paul Collier October 23, 2023

Michael Bloomberg is putting his money where his seditious anti-American mouth is, investing $1 billion in treasonous organizations whose sole goal is to destroy America’s electric grid infrastructure in the name of saving the planet from the boogeyman they invented called “man-made climate change,” (which was once “global freezing” until that didn’t happen and then it was “global warming” until that didn’t happen).

He’s already invested half a billion and just announced an additional half a billion to buy the anti-American revolutionary politicians he needs to gut America’s electric grid by 40 percent or more, leaving the most poor among us the most vulnerable to this murderous scheme.

From newgeography.com

The September 20 announcement quotes Bloomberg as saying the $500 million gift marks a “new chapter in the Beyond Carbon campaign, as we move to finish the job. By working with our partners across the country, we hope to transform the way we power America by moving beyond fossil fuels and replacing them with renewable energy.” The press release goes on to say the goal is to “shut down every last U.S. coal plant,” and “slash gas plant capacity in half, and block all new gas plants.”

If Bloomberg is successful, thousands will die as a result of his sick scheme, a scheme that treats humans as a virus that has diseased the planet, and thus must be eradicated, which is why the gay agenda is so popular with such genocidal maniacs as Bloomberg and his far-left anti-Americanists. They want you, me, and all your friends and family dead to serve their god, themselves, through the avatar that is “man-made climate change.”

New Geography adds this, “ The timing of Bloomberg’s announcement could scarcely be more tone-deaf. It comes in the wake of repeated warnings made this year by America’s top regulators, grid operators, and an industry association that our power grid is losing too much dispatchable generation capacity and is adding too much capacity that is dependent on the vagaries and whims of the weather. Indeed, Bloomberg announced the $500 million donation scarcely a month after the North American Electric Reliability Corporation warned that bad energy policy was a significant threat to the reliability of the U.S. electric grid. More on that in a moment.”

If America were run by Americans, Bloomberg and his ilk would be facing charges of sabotage, sedition, aiding and abetting the enemy, and high crimes and misdemeanors for the actions he and the far left have taken to INTENTIALLY destroy the American republic from within to replace it with the Chinese model, the model that uses the most exploitative parts of capitalism and the most authoritarian parts of Marxism to create a Utopia for state-approved billionaires to rule without competition over a land denuded of “useless mouths” through their genocidal policies, like LGBTQ fascism, abortion, and crippling America’s ability to keep us warm through long winters.

For a better understanding of our standards of news reporting, read our report “The Prophetic Voice in News?”

Human-Trained AI Emotion-Driven Marketers Are Coming Your Way. Is Your Mind at Risk?

Paul Collier October 20, 2023

Actors not in the top tier of acting are finding life difficult economically as the SAF-AFTRA strike continues into its 5th month. Some have found work with Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, “training” AI through acting. While the actors have signed contracts that state their likenesses cannot be used for future endeavors, the language is written in such a way that perhaps, maybe, Meta has plenty of legal loopholes to betray that simple promise.

The actors were paid to participate in a study called the “emotion study,” which ran from Jul through September of this year. The study offered actors $150 per hour to “emote” for AI machines to analyze in the hope that AI can then be used to artificially “emote” in seamless ways to humans.

The irony of the work is not lost on the actors, who recognize they’re helping to train machines that might one day replace them, even if Meta “promises” not to use their image in any commercial way in the future.

Even though the actors are “acting,” the project claims it’s not “struck work” because Meta is not one of the employers the guild is striking against. As Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, SAG-AFTRA’s chief negotiator claims, “This isn’t a contract battle between a union and a company, It’s existential.”

Max Kalehoff, the VP of growth and marketing for the company running the study for Meta, said “The vast majority of our work is in evaluating the effectiveness of advertising for clients—which has nothing to do with actors and the entertainment industry except to gauge audience reaction.”

From technology review:

In addition to the job posting, MIT Technology Review has obtained and reviewed a copy of the data license agreement, and its potential implications are indeed vast. To put it bluntly: whether the actors who participated knew it or not, for as little as $300, they appear to have authorized Realeyes, Meta, and other parties of the two companies’ choosing to access and use not just their faces but also their expressions, and anything derived from them, almost however and whenever they want—as long as they do not reproduce any individual likenesses.

Some actors, like Jessica, who asked to be identified by just her first name, felt there was something “exploitative” about the project—both in the financial incentives for out-of-work actors and in the fight over AI and the use of an actor’s image.

Jessica, a New York–based background actor, says she has seen a growing number of listings for AI jobs over the past few years. “There aren’t really clear rules right now,” she says, “so I don’t know. Maybe … their intention [is] to get these images before the union signs a contract and sets them.”

While this writer does not support government laws prohibiting the use of Ai trained by humans to better manipulate humans to buy stuff they might not actually want or need, companies that choose to use this technology should be considered unethical, untrustworthy, not worth investing in or doing business with. Of course, being a realist, this writer realizes the ability to cut ourselves off from the companies that are already using these types of services is not very realistic, and won’t be until we self-steward minded people build our own institutions, institutions that would not deign to use such unethical practices to manipulate the masses for the sake of profit.

Political factions are sure to follow, if they aren’t already, which makes it all the more urgent for you, and me, to be self-stewarded people who steward our preferences and beliefs to guard our minds against such crafty manipulations.

Democrats Move to Protect Walmart from Expensive Credit Card Networks at YOUR Expense

Paul Collier October 19, 2023

Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) is advancing a bill that will allow merchants to use any network they want to complete your credit card transaction with them. This bill will have the net effect of allowing merchants to use much-less secure networks, even foreign networks, to complete their transaction, saving them lots of money but putting you at risk of credit card fraud they themselves won’t be held accountable for.

The bill is called the “Credit Card Competition Act, ” and from a far left perspective, where everything corporate is automatically evil (even if, in current year, our “American” corporations ARE mostly evil, but that’s due to them becoming far left hate machines and not simply product and service providers), they might view this as a good thing, because it gets the big guy, the big credit card companies.

But it’s not that simple. The main beneficiaries of this bill will be the big box companies like Walmat. They’re attacking one mega-corporation to favor another mega-corporation at the cost and security of average working class Americans, the ones that will be hurt most by this Orwellian-named bill.

This bill is about the far left rewarding the big corporations that help fund their anti-American, anti-God, genocidal programs that advocate for criminalizing thought and legalizing murder.

From Breitbart:

Big-box stores are pushing for this bill heavily. The likes of Walmart, Target, and Amazon stand to gain hundreds of millions of dollars if they can cut their processing costs by using cheap overseas networks. Unfortunately, they will do this at your expense. Cheaper networks offer little or no credit card rewards and have not invested in 21st century fraud prevention. But big-box stores know they won’t be on the hook if fraud occurs. Your bank or credit union has guaranteed payment to the retailer, and it’s these financial institutions that will be hurt when fraud skyrockets further.

This will especially hurt small credit unions who don’t have the deeper pockets of multinational corporations. Not only will they have to cover the cost of fraudulent purchases, they will also lose revenue as they see the interchange fees they normal get during purchases plummet. Interchange fees are a critical component of America’s current payment infrastructure. By effectively capping them, Congress would put big retailers’ profits before Americans’ financial security. Big-box stores will profit while credit unions and other banks will have a harder time offering low-cost checking, loans to the community, and more.

Bills like this make me think of a bible verse that HEAVILY applies to the methods the far left uses to take and preserve power: “As for the scoundrel, his devices are evil. He plans wicked schemes to ruin the poor with lying words even when the plea of the needy is right.” – Isaiah 32:7

The far left is constantly pretending they represent the working class while most of their policies do far more harm to the very groups they trick into supporting them (through a promise of “revenge” against those who oppressed them and a Utopian future where suffering is finally ended). Senator Dick Durbin of the fallen state of Illinois (now controlled by a billionaire fascist) is the poster boy for that deceit. He is the scoundrel God warned us about through Isaiah.

Front