If you want to understand the nature of the DNC’s relationship to the CCP, look at what is emerging in the anticpated US Intelligence Report on the origins of the Covid-19 virus. The report will agree with this, the virus was not a biological weapon, As to the origins, there is uncertainty there. The report is alleged to say on the matter, that they were “unable to provide a more definitive explanation for the origin of COVID-19” (without new information).
They are certain it’s not biological, so that at least takes China out of the evil scientist running, a little relief from the DNC for Chairman Xi. The article also noted that World Health Organization sent a team to investigate itself and found it did nothing wrong and neither did China. And they’re totally not the same, not at all.
At any rate, with that burst of confidence in the science that the WHO inbues in us these day, China has at least one worry of its back (not that it was a great worry, but, well, Xi is a control freak so, no loose plankboards, no squeaky doors, this was a squeaky door). But the DNC giveth and holdeth outeth.
So what the DNC has done is essentially kept in their back pocket some possible power advantage in the frenemy game they’re playing with China,, something to still hold over Xi’s head, while at the same time not emboldening and enabling the type of people that would be inclined to opppose the DNC and what it’s currently doing to this land.
They walked the tight line and put themselves to have a little bargaining chip with China to assure they get their payoff, an open Chinese market that funds their conquest of the people of the Bill of Rights, the American people, those who are here today, those who have yet to arrive, and to our sojourners among us that choose to live in the Bill of Rights way.
They mean to conquer us all, not for anything but profit overseas for control here at home.
The agencies were instructed by US President Joe Biden to report on the possible origins of the virus but could not come to a conclusion.
They agreed that the virus was not “developed as a biological weapon” and was likely not genetically engineered but remained split on other possibilities.
The agencies had two potential hypotheses: that it came from natural exposure to an infected animal or that it resulted from a laboratory incident.
Some intelligence analysts found both hypotheses equally likely while others gave weight to a specific hypothesis.
But the analysts said they would be “unable to provide a more definitive explanation for the origin of COVID-19” unless new information or evidence emerged.
The World Health Organization sent a team of international scientists to Wuhan to study the virus’ origins…
An allegedly American publication that claims to be literally for the national interest, called National Interest, has published an opinion piece by anti-Americanist Eleanor Lopatto, who, mercifully for National Interest, appears to have only written just this one article for the publication. What she writes is nothing but CCP-styled anti-american agit prop aimed at vilifying more than half of Americans, subhumanizing people who are skeptical about the efficacy and safety of vaccines, and feeding the enemies of the Ameircan people outside our soils the grist they need to propagandize this anti-American hate on our own social media platforms, and to even sue us out of existence for the damage this insane woman would have you believe they committed.
The ‘writer’ (content marketer for the CCP’s little bro, the DNC) has claimed that the resistance to the vaccine worldwide, especially in the Balkans,can be laid squarely at the feet of America, the evil Empire that allows disinformation on its platforms. This is the safety first, liberty non-existence type person we’ve all seen far too often get the limelight in a world where freedom is defined as being obedient and subservient to the experts, be they scientists, teachers, or government officials. This is Chinese Communist thinking, not American Bill of Rights thinking, and this woman just outed herself as a hater of the very nation-state that made her protected, privileged little life possible in the first place.
You will see more stories like this, as first their low-ranked sycophants test the tolerance of anti-American narratives on the general public. If there is no great outrage, MSNBC and CNN will be speaking the same language as this anti-Americanist, the seditionist-at-heart, Eleanor Lopatto, a woman who makes a very dangerous neighbor to anyone she lives next to, for she is the type that would turn in Anne frank for violating the law, being Jewish while being alive.
Not only is this woman creating narratives our enemies can use against us (including using our own courts to sue the allaged offenders), but she’s also pushing the narrative that Chairman Xi would dearly love to be pushed, that freedom is dangerous, and free speech and free press are too much for the weakminded many masses to have access to, or participate in. And she does so on a publication that LITERALLY calls itself “National Interest” while publishing what could EASILY have been CCP agit prop.
As a matter of fact, the particular style is remarkably similar to that of CCP agit prop aimed at destroying America and American morale, so much so that one would not be suprirsed to learn she was writing from her Uncle’s CCP basement in China, using an American psuedonym to hide her CCP agent identiy. I mean, I don’t really think that’s the case, but, it certainly is possible.
There’s a saying that when the United States sneezes, the world catches a cold. Now some of the world’s most robust immune systems are struggling with a bad case of QAnon.
The three Baltic countries—Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania—are some of the best-prepared on Earth to defend against the evolving threat of modern information campaigns. Their governments, businesses and civil societies honed their skills against Russian information and cyber warfare for nearly a decade before the United States uncovered evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign.
The coronavirus panedemic was a major stress test for the Baltics, forcing intelligence and strategic communications analysts to reconfigure their Russia-centric threat models in order to face a tsunami of misleading information coming not just across their Eastern border, but from every corner of the Earth. The Latvian Strategic Coordination Department coordinated crisis communications while also…
Incredible as it sounds, most voters most of the time are likely to vote for some degree of authoritarianism if the person or policy promises benefits based on shallow needs and wants and/or parochial interests. It’s not a left or right, Democrat versus Republican, thing. Regardless of your left or right leanings or your party affiliation, you have been subconsciously indoctrinated through socializing agents and acculturation to not think deeply or according to ideals and principles, which makes you relatively easy to control.
Today we make note it is mostly Democrats who are keen on authoritarianism, but they are not the sole progenitors of authoritarianism! Authoritarianism is basically a monopoly of power and control by a snall hierarchical cadre, often but not always led by a dictator or monarch, without any practical accountability to anyone.
Democrats are not the problem, at times past especially, and probably in the future, Republicans also bend toward this trait. The Republican leadership typically offers reactionary resistance to most anything that addresses poverty or racism or any real social injustice. This belies their claims to be all about freedom and prosperity, because if you deny justice and equality to some, even if just through neglect, you are not truly for freedom and prosperity. Just as the left wears justice and equality as a banner to repaint their authoritarianism, so the right tend to wave the banner of freedom and prosperity, neither side’s leaders actually live up to these branding claims.
Why then do Republicans in primaries and general elections often promote authoritarians like Mitt Romney and the Bushes? Why did the GOP become essentially a sort of fan club for one man, Donald Trump, whose own behavior and some of his views also tend to go against a true freedom and prosperity agenda? (Being for or against Trump isn’t the issue, the issue is that many simply follow Trump and don’t really have any other reason to support Republicans.)
Why do Democratic voters let people control their party who genuinely reject the fundamentals of civil rights whenever it is convenient and/or hurts their opponents? Why do Democratic voters tend to support an abundance of laws and regulations that fail to deliver on their promised benefit while simply making life harder for more people?
The basic question is, why, after one scratches the surface and finds a politician and/or a policy that tends toward authoritarianism do voters in both parties vote for these people and policies? More basically, why do voters vote for authoritarianism?
The average person and the mass mind follow basic animal instinct, they judge every book by its cover and they weigh most every choice on shorter term personal gain of the most basic of needs and wants. The average person and the mass mind live in a shallow way, they don’t dig too deep or look too high, they cannot see very far in the future or very far into the past. The entire premise of marketing is to understand and influence the instinctive aninal brain and to depend on a population not being trained to dig deeper, to know history, or to use logic and critical thinking to ascertain long-term future probabilities.
If you were to explore, learn, understand, and apply the deeper and more sublime ideals and principles of freedom, the balance of virtue, liberty and independence and the core ideals, you would find that you are not very free, that most all your political options tend to oppose these freedom ideals and principles to some degree, and that you can be more free. But most people don’t think in terms of ideals and principles and they don’t consciously or with any discipline evaluate anything on the basis of ideals and principles.
The word “indoctrination” is usually a negative term for people. When schools stop teaching essentials and skills and seek only to indoctrinate children into following a radical leftwing authoritarian ideology, even though it is not presented openly for what it is, we think of indoctrination as something very bad. But indoctrination is just the internalization of doctrine and if the doctrine is good and the indoctrination process is open, transparent, and engaged in freely, it’s just a way to internalize a compass that gives direction to our decisions and behaviors and thus increases our chances for success and happiness.
The insidious and deliberate use of socializing agents of influence and control to subconsciously inculcate us with what are bad doctrines rooted in authoritarianism is the kind of indoctrination we need to guard our hearts and minds against. The use of this form of indoctrination has never been worse or more prevalent in human civilization. On the other hand, we have never had more information and insight into how socialization and acculturation work than we do now, so we can protect ourselves from this like never before.
Most people are not self-indoctrinated to understand freedom ideals and principles, therefore they can be made to support people and policies that undermine their own freedom, do them injustice, create massive inequalities, and reduce prosperity for most people. It is true that justice, equality, and prosperity matter and tend to promote success and happiness, but the foundation of these things is freedom.
To be clear, our concept of freedom is not to be confused with the brand of freedom used to help elect Republicans. Often this is itself rather shallow and limited and doesn’t include freedom from abuse, injustice, and exploitation.
Freedom exists when you are mostly governed by a combination of your own individual choices and the common standards and norms of your own free associations with other people. Justice happens when all laws and policies by ALL institutions equally and consistently protect your freedom and both respect and nurture your human dignity, human rights, and human flourishing without bias or favor, privilege or prejudice. Whatever other needs and wants are promised by any politician or policy, if they tend to shift the governance of your life towards coercive systems like the system set up by monopoly corporations or the state, then they will tend to be a drag on your life, not a benefit.
But most people cannot fathom this because the causal relationship isn’t direct and immediate, it is indirect and more long-term in its effects. An authoritarian policy can bring short-term benefits to some people, usually the targeted voter base of the party proposing such policies, but the longer term effect is that those very same people experience a decrease in freedom and an increase in cost that doesn’t justify the benefits of the policy.
Welfare as constructed and provided has gutted the family unit and rendered whole cities third-world-like nightmares riven with corruption and violence. Few will ever understand that voting for the party that offered these “benefits” is the reason they were raised by a single parent, went to crappy schools, have brutal police who see them as animals, can’t find a good paying job, and can’t find a faithful mate who will love them for life. Most of these people would never even read these words because The Freedomist itself isn’t endorsed by their quisling leaders who sell their communities to the Party for a pittance and then peddle bogeyman fears and utopian promises as a hallucinogenic.
People vote for authoritarianism because they cannot or will not indoctrinate themselves with a freedom ideology that they can internalize to make better choices, including their own daily life and who and what they vote for. Few people will ever agree to and embrace the truth that ideals and principles should guide our choices, including how we vote, or that every choice should basically be subjected to the litmus test of those ideals and principles.
A quote wrongly attributed by H TrevorRoper to Joseph Goebells, Nazi Propaganda Minister, sums up the methodology of all authoritarians:
There was no point in seeking to convert the intellectuals. For intellectuals would never be converted and would anyway always yield to the stronger, and this will always be “the man in the street.” Arguments must therefore be crude, clear and forcible, and appeal to emotions and instincts, not the intellect. Truth was unimportant and entirely subordinate to tactics and psychology.
The only counter to this is to have and hold a deeper freedom ideology based on sound logic and reason and that promotes success and happiness both broadly and for each individual. Yielding to anything, whether force or empty promises to meet shallow wants and needs should never be an option. But history shows that such intellectual and moral courage and discipline is always the exception for individuals and almost never the rule for the masses.
Obtaining and internalizing a freedom ideology isn’t just a good way to make better voting choices, it is a secret formula for personal success and happiness that, if you use it consistently, will tend to make you more free and more prosperous and will tend to protect you from injustice and unequal treatment based on bias, prejudice, and bigotry. If you want justice, you must start with freedom, but to protect freedom, you must uphold and advance justice.
Until we see a new day emerge where most voters follow ideals and principles before promises and shallow parochial interests, we will always see authoritarianism gain some support from most voters.
The Democratic Party leaders want a monopoly of power to enrich monopoly corporations and politicos. They are not, as some claim, “anti white.” Democratic Party leaders aren’t really against white people or whiteness. Likewise, they don’t really care about racial justice and equality or equity, or whatever words they are using today. They don’t care about the rich not paying enough. They don’t care about the environment or the climate. They don’t care about women’s health or pay equity.
As an example, “whiteness”, as these thugs present it in its worse light, is just the symbol of things they hate: morality, liberty, free markets, America, and the like. All these other things they are allegedly for or against are also just pretense. One doesn’t have to be white to be for these things, but to Democratic Party leaders, the myth that these are inherently white, and therefore racist, ideas, is designed to keep people from exploring them and demanding freedom from the neocom wokatariate!
We distinguish between the leaders and most Democrats and we don’t let the crony collaboration party (neocon cronies) of the GOP, off the hook. On one hand, the topmost GOP leaders tend to be collaborators with the freedom takers, on the other hand there is a cult of personality around Donald Trump that is divorced from the greatest republican ideals of freedom rooted in virtue, liberty, and independence. A true freedom alternative within either Party that dominates modern politics is lacking.
To be perfectly clear: concerns about racial injustice, institutional inequity, the climate and the environment, worker’s rights, and all these other things are legitimate and millions of people who vote Democrat genuinely care about these things in ways we should all emulate. Nobody should gainsay these issues nor seek to deny the rights and self-determination of any person or national people or any group to pursue a life fitting to their own beliefs, values, and convictions. Even if we see marriage and the family through our lens of historic Christian orthodoxy, we cannot deny that others have a right to live out and define these things as they see fit, for example.
We do not criticize the Democratic Party leaders for raising such issues, we criticize them for exploitating these issues in a very disingenuous manner and for presenting “solutions” that tend toward authoritarianism without even addressing the core problem. If you think demozing white people and white shaming along with authoritarianism will solve the very real concerns of racial injustice then you are being played a fool.
It is this gross misappropriation of legitimate grievances and the hyper-exaggeration of conflict that we must confront and defy as tools of an authoritarianism that has no place in a free and pluralistic society of equals!
Meanwhile, Democratic Party leaders use “anti-whiteness” hyperbolic rhetoric to bludgeon people into submission without thinking critically. By demonizing being white or whiteness they can then associate everything that isn’t totalitarian and communist with being white and make people reject it without even thinking about the true meaning or the implications of letting the modern Party of Lenin and Mao and its woke cancel culture extremism ruin this land.
Their modernized version of communism, neocommunism, uses the wokatariate agenda and cancel culture as well as creates an alliance between monopoly corporate rulers and political rulers to manage and control society for their own benefit but by making the same utopian promises and authoritarian claims as old communists. This is also true of all their other utopian claims and bogeyman fears: the only purpose is to remove logic, critical thinking, open and free debate and discourse, transparency, and accountability from the equation.
To the morally depraved Democratic Party establishment, freedom and the Bill of Rights are somehow too white or too hateful or too harmful to the climate and the only cure is a totalitarian one-party state. They do not have a shred of humanity or decency in their wicked Ahab souls. They are the bane of this land and enemies of freedom.
Pictured above, the Soviet star on top of the american flag (Star and Stripes) symbolizing the true spirit and intent of the neocom wokatariate and the neocon cronytariate!
Democratic Party leaders consider everyone who isn’t a supporter of their whole ideology a domestic terrorist but also don’t have a problem doing business with the terrorists of the Taliban. They virtue signal for racial justice but support the Chinese Communists who are genociding the Uyghurs. Democratic Party leaders consider you an unwoke terrorist if you don’t cotton to 50 genders but these unscrupulous haters of liberty are OK with the Taliban who treat women like property.
Everything they say about justice and equality or systemic racism or the rainbow cancel culture agenda, all their alt-gendered mind games, their wild and repeatedly unrealized sensational claims about the climate are pretense. They are focused only on gaining themselves monopoly power to line their pockets and satisfy a morbid and inhumane lust for total control over the lives of other human beings. It is an erotic pleasure only the mentally abnormal and imbalanced can experience when they lord it over others and deny them their basic human dignity.
Democratic Party leaders are a den of craven, immoral, mentally imbalanced, and unjust freedom takers who are collectively guilty of crimes against humanity. We should reject their claims, their virtue signaling, and their utopian promises, as we should reject their bogeyman fears of systemic racism and an apocalyptic climate change crisis. Everything they say is a lie and all their motives are impure: they do not want a good life for most people, they want a good life for themselves and for everyone else to be their slaves.
The party of slavery hasn’t changed a bit since it started a rebellion to keep its slaves, costing over 650,000 lives. The scope and methods of the slavers has changed and now includes everyone save the few ruling class who get to run this massive plantation. The true motivation of the Democratic Party leaders is that they are the true spiritual heirs of slavers past: they are modern slavers who wish to get you to exchange real freedom for the “freedom” to pleasure yourself and “explore” false alt genderism until you are an animal and until you are isolated from faith and family so you make a good slave.
The neocom wokatariate and the collaborators of the neocon cronytariate are, together, a clear and present danger to the very existence of these United States of free and sovereign republics and free and sovereign people! We need a true and 100% freedom alternative!
Upadaria is that alternative. Upadaria represent a massive civilizational shift that you can use, practice, and experience in your own life and relationships right now. Things like our four core ideals, our 17 Protocols, and our practices and mandates, are all designed to enhance your quality of life and personal freedom. And they can be used by anyone, anywhere, at any time, on their own and in free association with others.
Our focus away from mere politics and back toward reinvigorating faith, family, and free association in community with others through freewill participation is a bold departure from an approach that, in relying too heavily on politics, ironically makes politics too powerful and people as individuals too powerless!
In contrast to the neocom wokatariate and the necon cronytariate, Upadaria represents a dream of freedom where every single person is valued, nobody is left behind, and every group or national people is free to live their lives according to their own self-determination. It is a global vision anyone can tap into and utilize in their own life and relationships, immediately and in free association with anyone who they want to associate with.
Perhaps this is the reason why Upadaria, as a global project, attracts people from left and right, and perhaps the reason so many who call themselves Democrats are drawn to this vision. Our vision is equal parts freedom and justice for all, leaving nobody behind!
Upadaria stands on a basic premise that we are all Created in the image of God, that we all own spiritual sovereignty, and that God’s desire for human civilization itself is to foster a free and pluralistic society of equals where everyone who desires can find God if haply they seek Him!
The neocom wokatariate soundbite for social justice, the neocon cronytariate soundbite for freedom. We demand justice through freedom, we oppose the ruling class and their authoritarianism!
What the Democratic Party leaders say that they are for and against is all lies. They are for themselves and it is time rank and file Democrats, who genuinely care about things like racial justice, rise up and demand solutions that are also in accordance with basic freedom standards for all people.
PGC – There is yet another social media app coming on board to join the not-at-all-saturated-and-dominated market. That app is called Gossip. The app does this, by the CEO’s own words:
“Our product allows users to create and share short voice stories (30s or less) that expire every 7 days – because who wants to listen to the old stuff?”
The app itself is interesting in its temporality, not that you will be immune from archiving if you use this app, but the spirt of the creation itself could be there for what the CEO would hope to be its vast majority audience.
These are two spirits, as I see them, brevity and temporailty.
The spirit of brevity, matches the age we are currently in as far as our primary means of regular communication, and the spirit of temporality, a spirit I would argue we live in though we have strong veneers of the eternal thjat cut us from seeing the nature of the things we create in current year, that awful reality we so desperately want to avoid looking at.
To die is to live, to live is to die.
The app itself is interesting enough to warrant some coverage, but this quote from the CEO is what interested me in writing about this:
“Most of the time the content we are listening to augments our perception of reality.”
Words create internal patterns that set, what I call, our heuristical institutional patternings, our habits of action and supposition that guide and compel us through the overwhelming majority of the actions we take, be it thinking or dialing a number.
This is a recognition of the assumptions of many philosophers regarding the nature of being, whether it is an internal imagining, and thus the place for investigation, or the fruit of an external happening, and thus making the external the place for the investigation into the nature of being.
Of course, there are many hybrids of these assumptions and one would guess, perhaps, that this CEO of Gossip might very well one of these hybrids, those that dance between the internal possible and external possible of being. Plato, it could be argued (and has) had his own balancing act he held between the nature of being, which was not purely logical, observational, nor was it relative, there were absolutes.
Plato’s absolutes are ideals that you don’t dare define too particularly lest you become reduced by them until you no longer exist in them, they wholly exist in you.
So, if our Gossip CEO does reside somewhere in the midst of the internal and the external as to the origin of selfness within our observational senses, then I give this project a good chance of succeeding, but if the CEO is all-too-external-assuming, then Gossip will meat the heavy maw of moral authority in short order.
The reason I put him in this category is because of his quote, where he refers to the content outside the self as an augmentation to our reality, but not the full definer of it. This does not mean, from one quote, you can deduce this man walks between internal and external, it only means he said nothing in this interview to suggest otherwise, and that quote perfectly sums up the position he seems to take.
This is very important for a small start-up with a CEO willing to put his narrative on their brand. The idea itself is snapchatty, but perhaps the longer life will attract people that will do what he seems to hope the app will do for people, create good ephemera that can help their bodies calibrate positively in the world around them. If your content is affirming, your day just might be affected by that pattern as well.
HackerNoon Reporter: Please tell us briefly about your background.
My background is in augmented reality. I’m passionate about products where users can share what they experience, and how they feel – this is something I was working on before I started Gossip, which is also augmented reality, just in a different way.
Most of the time the content we are listening to augments our perception of reality.
If we are listening to a funny story, we might leave a bigger tip to the waiter or grant an extra smile.
PGC – On its face, Apple’s decision to scrub the phones owned by other people looking for inappropriate photos beneath the age of consent might seem like a great idea, but is there risk to giving a company such a power as this? What innocents might be caught up in bad AI interpretations that later become owned by the human judges for fear of undermining the system.
But Apple isn’t just scanning for the sexually disgusting, but also evidence of child abuse, an area even more grey and uncertain than what constitutes illicit and something else when it comes to pictures of children.
Expect to read soon of real humans, innocent humans, caught in this centrally-controlled web by an AI bad take.
Now, imagine the value to almost anyone who could afford it of the database that could tell you the names of the people attached to scans that maybe didn’t cross a legal line but might expose them to something else. Imagine if these poeple were influencers, be they thought leaders, politicians, religious leaders, etc.
Apple does deals with China, they’re clearly not against states that murder their citizens for simply disagreeing with them, so how much do you trust them with such a database as they will inevitably create?
Apple unveiled plans to scan U.S. iPhones for images of child sexual abuse, drawing applause from child protection groups but raising concern among some security researchers that the system could be misused, including by governments looking to surveil their citizens.
The tool designed to detected known images of child sexual…
PGC – A world bank report is beginning to recognize the flaws of macroeconomic systems, that is, integrated massive networks of economic interdependency usually dominated by a handful of mega-scale players, a system such as the United States now finds itself.
The world bank is not seeking to create a new paradigm that would fundamentally alter the whole macroecomic dominance of our ways of creating and trading value. The world bank is seeking to alert the macro-systems to their vulnerabilities, so they can build a bit more slack into the system.
Be sure you echo the prevailing moral supremacist construct of the time and spend visibly large amounts of money contributing to the non-profiits associated with such belief systems.
Your overall profits will suffer a little, but the payoff is complaisancy, the significant diminishment of potential future competition, and thus the preservation of the system as a whole.
If you really want to undermine the macroenomic dominace of our lives, you will choose home and free associative and neighborhood self sustainability and industry. We have technology today that can shift the balance of power from the macro to the micro, using such micro concepts as microfactories and microgrids to start.
3D Printing has only begun to open the door to home and neighborhood manufacturing that could one day render distant factory production redundant altogether.
If this government really wanted to bring ‘justice’ to this earth, and ‘equality’ it would invest in creating space for neighborhoods to grow together, create together, manufacture together, to become more self-sustaining, to replace Walmart with a visit to the neighborhood minifactory where you put your order in last week and now you’re paying a neighbor to print your product out for you and get it ready for use.
This could be our future, and still can, and it starts with you, with your commitment to become self-sustaining in every way you can and work to build relations with others around you willing to do the same.
FREETOWN, August 5, 2021 – Addressing macroeconomic weaknesses and implementing reforms to mitigate their risks to growth will be critical for a sustained inclusive economic recovery that supports poverty reduction, according to a new World Bank economic analysis for Sierra…
PGC – A US Magesterial Judge named N. Reid Neureiter, who serves in the liberal district of Colorado, has ruled that the lawyers who sued the Federal government over election law violations in 2020 will have to pay the legal fees of everyone involved.
He based his ruling primarily around the assumption that the lawsuits were “fantastical,” committing himself to the narrative that these were the most secure elections ever in the history of the known universe, or words to that effect.
The ruling no doubt will be appealed until it reaches the Supreme Court where the consequences of partisan lawfare are far deeper than when a minor magistrate makes a ruling with his party instead of the constitution, as appears to have happened in this case.
The ongoing debate about the legitimacy of this election is moot, however, in this writer’s opinion, as the Federal government conducted and certified a mass mailer election in 2020, and thus failed to execute an actual republican-democratic election, one with accountability, but instead chose to conduct an unaccountable mass mailer election, the net outcome of which will never be known, nor is it relevent, as even if Donald Trump “won” the election itself should have never happened in the first place.
Lawyers for dozens of Donald Trump supporters who made wild conspiracy claims about Facebook Inc. and Dominion Voting Systems Inc. rigging the 2020 Presidential election will have to pay up for their bogus suit, a federal judge in Colorado ruled.
A pair of attorneys who filed the case on behalf of disgruntled voters violated court rules by making no attempt to verify their “fantastical” allegations against the social-media giant and the voting-technology firm, U.S. Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter concluded Tuesday in Denver.
Bill Collier- My hesitancy on the vaccine is more rooted in the rather outlandish and, frankly, authoritarian responses and the refusal to countenance real questions, than anything else. Add to that the fact this is a new vaccine, the same government pushing this has done some really awful things, and the fact now things shifted from the vaccine providing immunity to now vaccinated people have to mask up again.
The “vaccine fascists” need to re-learn the American’s Creed to understand why bullying, shaming, and coercing undermine confidence and only engender resistance. The homeland of “give me liberty or give me death” isn’t going to, I hope, give up on its essential creed, not even for a virus that has a less than half percent mortality rate.
I genuinely feel there is no real overwhelming guarantee this thing is as beneficial as claimed in the long term or that it may not have some serious problems. I may be wrong, but claling me a conspiracy theorist or canceling me will not only fail to convince me and be morally reprehensible for you to do, it will convince others this whole vaccine regimen isn’t to be trusted.
I can be convinced. I do notice that 99% of recent deaths are people without the vaccine. But, honestly, will this remain the same? It was also reported the Delta variant is more lethal, exact numbers not explained, and more contagious. This is also concerning.
Browbeating me or mandating this only fills me with alarm. Again, I DO NOT TRUST a government that has repeatedly and dangerously lied to me all my life! Too often the government claims their measures are beneficial and decades later Congress passes a resolution begging forgiveness.
The much vaunted polio vaccine infected almost 100 million people with a cancer-causing virus, but to this day the government, the same one extolling the vaccine of the hour, refuses to seriously study and reveal how many lives were lost or how many people got cancer and had their lives ruined. How can we take them seriously?
My hesitancy decreases and I am ready to start the process, then some authoritarian nub screeches terrible things about the unvaccinated being worse than Satan, or something outlandish like that, and I recoil. I don’t know why the ruling class are so adamant about this but I doubt anyone, ever, thinks these louts care about anything but being more powerful. But the fact there is such a full press on and it has so many authoritarian features fills me with dark suspicion.
The trend further away from treating people with dignity and respect, tolerance for all views and creeds, and respect for human rights, amd the trend toward ever more partisan and authoritarian responses meant to gain political advances, has consequences. A plurality of people, who are already demonized by the leftwing authoritarians for not being “woke” enough, just can’t see why they should trust people who call them nazis and racists at the slightest hint of disagreement!
Vaccines may indeed eliminate this vurus as a serious threat. The unvaccinated may spur new varieties that can render the vaccine useless for everyone else. This is a real concern. On the other hand, unlike polio, which had a 5-10% mortality, this virus has a very small mortality rate. What this means is that if we discover, too late to fix it, that all these vaccines do real long-term harm, we could see more harm done by the vaccines than by the virus over, say, a 30 year period.
I am not claiming we will see such harm. But, in light of the government’s predilection to lying, and in light of the continued refusal to face the truth about tainted polio vaccines, being skeptical seems quite reasonable. I am proposing that polling back the demonizing and authoritarianism, on all fronts, may be far more conducive to winning people over to get the vaccine. Doubling down on the hate and authoritarianism will only further fragment society and increase distrust.
This notion a few talking heads are convincing people the vaccine will make them grow two heads and that’s why some remain skeptical is garbage. It’s like when someone is not complying with your wishes and you accuse them of letting someone else convince or control them instead assuming they can think for themselves based on the facts as they see them.
Perhaps the accusers bear the mental illness of letting others dictate their beliefs through propaganda and are just projecting on to others. But trying to convince me this is safe in the long-term, as well as effective, means total transparency, being treated with dignity, and a total commitment to my right to choose my health options.
I want to believe this is safe and effective but when the argument against any questions about these things is canceling people, authoritarianism, and constant one-sided propaganda, it’s not conducive to building trust. When I see everyone, from government to the manufacturers, is absolved of all responsibility if it does you harm, this is disconcerting. Everyone demands we take the vaccine but offers neither an iron-clad guarantee nor assumes accountability and responsibility if they fail to deliver.
I may get the vaccine. I am praying God protects me if I do and even if, once again, we find the government failed, the vaccine didn’t work or was tainted, and the government tries desperately to cover it up for 40 years before Congress passes a resolution apologizing for our country’s misdeeds.
For those who accept the woke communist theory that all white people bear shame and guilt for the alleged misdoings of other white people, the desire to escape being part of the oppressing class is intense. Nobody wants to be irredeemable as an outcast, a pariah, just because of things they cannot control.
NOTE: Not everyone who feels they are not heterosexual or who adopts an alt gender is merely escaping white guilt and nor do they all care about what others think of them. I personally know many alt gendered or non-hetero individuals who I care for and who care for me. The issue here is purely the escape from white guilt, not the fact people may genuinely feel a different sexual orientation or reject gender norms.
So what is a person to do?
The answer is simple: join an oppressed group and vilify the oppressors, especially white, Christian, straight males. Indeed, the hatred of the woke communists for Christianity is particularly virulent. We are seeing children who have bought this woke communist ideology of hate turn on and vilify their own parents and families, often using gross exaggeration just as the woke exaggerate America’s past mistakes, and reveling in how “horrible” their first world privileged life has been because of their evil white, Christian, straight parents.
The path of escape is all too easy: identify as lgbtq or something, anything, other than Christian and straight. Reject these two things and identify as their opposite and you have a free pass into the oppressed class. You are no longer a privileged white male, you are a victim and now you have standing.
The irony of being a privileged white straight male all your life only to become some alt gendered victim whose very victim status gives you privilege!
There aren’t precise surveys we can trust to show the impact of this dynamic, but the trend is likely to be strongly in favor of a mass shift away from the ethical and moral orthodoxy of historic Christianity, for example. The adoption of victimhood is powerful and hard to fight, the victim truly believe they are and have always been oppressed, mostly by their parents and family, who they lie about merely to burnish their bona fides. These lies are actually embraced, they believe them, in that weird way the human mind can reprogram its own memories based on whatever narrative we apply to them.
We are all responsible for our choices and these children who smear their own past, and their family, especially their parents, bear the guilt and shame of dishonoring their own kin. This is not something any human should do lightly because it has consequences. You burn bridges from the only people who would truly have your back, making you isolated and atomized.
For the woke communists, a married mother and father raising their own children according to their Judeo-Christian worldview and values is in and of itself oppression and hardship to endure!
This is cult behavior. The woke communist wants you to reject your own human connections to isolate you from anyone who might be able to warn you about how you are being used and harmed. Having made you a disconnected, undifferentiated, atomized individual without roots or connections of depth, the woke communist shot-callers can turn your mind to mush, destroy your agency, and separate you from God and those who love you.
Almost everyone who is today suddenly realizing they are alt-gendered victims of their Judeo-Christian parents and society is seeking an escape from white guilt. Their connection to anything approaching a just and free worldview and ethic are severed.
They no longer value freedom for all but assiduously follow the edicts promulgated by every establishment in this land, all the while imaging that they are the mavericks and independent thinkers. They are so edgy and unique but all sound alike and safely stay within the lines monopoly corporations have drawn.
From the freedomist perspective, we don’t desire to tell you what to call yourself or who to love, even though we believe a man and woman married for life raising their own or adopted children is the ideal for an advanced civilization. The fact we embrace freedom for all and have zero desire to compel anyone to follow our Judeo-Christian worldview or way of life isn’t enough for these brainwashed alt-gendered corporate robots. We must be punished for sins we did not commit and our way of life must be deconstructed as oppression in order for the addled miscreants to be able to live with themselves.
Demanding others accept things they sincerely believe are a sin is the very height of arrogant authoritarianism but these deceived people cannot see that. If your alt-gendered life isn’t able to withstand others thinking it is a sin, then the problem is your insecurity. As long as that belief doesn’t translate to forcing you to renounce your beliefs as an adult, then you have endured no wrong and have no right to demand or pressure anyone to agree with you.
The woke communists have convinced enough younger people, through our corrupt public schools, that being white, male, Christian, and straight makes you a moral inferior and the only escape is to adopt an alt gender and spew hate on your ancestors and your kin.
If you think the moral and ethical orthodoxy of historic Christianity and the Judeo-Christian worldview in general are somehow oppressive, then you do not understand justice or what is needed for a healthy, prisoerous, and free advanced civilization. To reject these things is to return to primitive savagery, barbaric and uncultured norms that produce sickness, poverty, and tyranny.
Our ideas and beliefs, which you deconstruct and vilify, which is your right which we do no deny, stand on their own. Unlike you bunch of corporate puppets and your alt gender confirmism, we are secure in who we are and what we believe, and we are just as happy to not have your approval for our way of life as we are to disapprove of your woke cancel culture ideology.
If you reject freedom for others, you reject freedom for yourself. If you turn in hatred toward your ancestors and your parents, you are only hating yourself. If you cannot make your own beliefs about your sexuality or gender not about deconstructing and cutting off others but about your own agency as a human being, then maybe it lacks sincerity and is really just an escape from a trap you set for yourself by adopting the white shame/white guilt lies of woke communist cancel culture ideology.
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
