PGC – One of the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky is Rule Number 4, Make the Enemy Live up to its own book of rules. This tactic has been deployed successfully by Anti-Bill-of-Rights movements such as the very kind the DNC has co-opted in its rise ot near-aboslute, near-one-party power.
The DNC has long held Republicans and conservatives by their own moral standards and has easily found their deficiencies in measuring up to their own moral standards as found in their rule books, which are usually the Bible and/or The Constitution.
WIth this in mind, conservatives are attempting to hold the DNC to its own standards, its own rules, this time regarding who should be cancelled, ostracized from society, and why. After Human Rights Campaign Director Alphonso David was exposed for allegedly enabling Andrew Cuomo’s sexual assaults by digging up dirt on his accusers and providing them to Cuomo, the conservatives thought they had a Rule 4 moment, to hold the enemy up by his own book law.
But the keyword here is law, something that is independent of human opinion or will, something that never changes and offers stable, predictable patterns for human governance. However capable of humans are at approaching such an actual state may be disputed, but when your starting point is that no such constant compass is needed, then Rule number 4 might not have any real power of you. Furthermore, by attempting to get HRC cancelled, you are perpetuating the legitimacy of the tactics being used by the DNC and its useful beasts such as HRC, corporate cancellation for a violation of moral supremacist assumptions.
The DNC derives its power from ideological constructs that have yet to be codified into any near-universal code, let alone have achieved any body of work that has attained anything approaching a state of infallibility. They have no book, only general feels regarding the general claims that they make about the nature of the world and how to fix the evils of the world they promise you is on the verge of killing you if you don’t first kill the killers, anyone outside the DNC orthodoxy, which shifts as the need of the few who control that machine require it to.
Any conservative organization that had a Director who committed such an obvious and egregious violation of the Corpowoketarianz code would surely be elimited from corporate futures if they had committed such an act. But the act itself is not the law, the law is the decision itself by those who hold power to use it to cut off anyone who doesn’t adhere to the code, which can be selectively enforced and not enforceed based on the positional alignment of the offender to the ones who wield the power to define what an offender is in the first pliace, the priest-king-queens of corpowoketarianizm.
In a sense, corpowoketarianizm produces the same moral frame as Confucionism, in that both end up not producing a moral code outside the power of the indivudals on top, but upon the consistent application of a moral code by the individuals on top define. The objective universality is not in the moral code itself, but in how the one with power chooses to enforce the moral code. For the corpowoketarianz, morality is war menu, one we pull upon to target those that can be targeted who oppose our efforts to remake humans in our images.
The conservatives may think the Corpowoketarianz are being inconsistent in not punishing HRC for the violation of women, but women in this system are only just above men in significance to the apex of society the corpowoketarianz choose to elavate and protect. Women are elevated over men, but not over homosexuals, or trans, for instance. As HRC covers both those power bases, the Corpowoketarianz are being consistent, and as their book is the book of power in the hands of the elite, not in any wisdom tradition with code outside the command of the individuals in power, there is no Rule 4 of Alinsky to save the conservatives from the DNC.
So long as conservatives continue to operate in the DNC morality courts, rather than conducting their own, they will always, always, always, always lose, and perhaps, given the dynamic of the state of ‘conservative’ leadership in America today, that’s just by design.
From nationalcenter.org
2021-08-16 17:00:07
Excerpt:
HRC Should Lose Corporate Support After Belittling Cuomo Accuser And Attempting To Destroy Women’s Sports And Religious Liberties, Says Free Enterprise Project
Washington, D.C. – Apple, American Airlines, Coca-Cola, Pfizer and Target failed to justify their continuing “platinum partner” support for the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) after the Free Enterprise Project (FEP) brought to their attention how HRC has opposed sexual-assault victims, girls’ and women’s sports and religious liberties.
Scott Shepard, who serves as FEP director at the National Center for Public Policy Research, sent a letter to the CEOs of each of these companies last Monday detailing these accusations and explaining the dangers associated with HRC’s use of the companies’ brands in light of these controversies.
