A post from September 3, 2016
TLDR: We must guard our own hearts against hatred just because the left use certain nationalities, groups, and persuasions to champion the authoritarian aims and as a foil to divide us.
THE ALT-RIGHT AND THE END OF AMERICA
A brief speech on our possible future by William Collier (to be read as a speech and not like a normal article.)
Ladies and gentlemen, the hour is late if you want to save the American political union. I feel that, as I have seen so much of what is happening now way back in 1982, I must warn you and I must show you that, if we who value a color-blind society rooted in Christian virtue are to escape and preserve ourselves from the crisis to come, we must consider what I saw as the path of refuge back then- the deliberate embracing of a new nationality defined by Christian ideals and a covenant bond without reference to race or even statehood.
But if you wish to save this Union you must also consider the same path, a new intentional ethnicity as it were, as a defender of the true meaning of America and the ideals upon which she was founded but which we have yet to achieve.
In 1982 if I told you that throughout parts of America a doctrine of white identity as the basis of citizenship would once again lead to the rise of a confederacy, you would have said I was nuts. And people did. But what I saw as a fictional scenario that sets up the end of America, the rise of racialism and racism, is fast becoming a real life scenario. With the rise of the alt-right movement we are seeing the potential demise of the American political union, but it’s NOT the fault of the alt-right.
The alt-right movement agrees on one point- that white identity deserves the same political organization as all the other racially defined groups. They believe that races are inherently different and unequal. They believe that the white identity, especially Anglo-Saxon identity, is more associated with America than any other racial identity.
When the left says America was a racist nation which favored white people, the alt-right says “so what, so do Arab nations and so does the Jewish state favor their race and religion.” Indeed, it is argued, the argument that Israel must be preserved as a distinctly Jewish state has been accepted by many and, so the logic runs, why wouldn’t the natural progeny of the Founders of the American state want to preserve the Anglo-Saxon and Christian identity and nature of their state?
America was and should remain an idea. But it should be a distinct idea. And to be an American one ought to demonstrate adherence to that idea. This naturally includes the core beliefs and values which made America what it was, as outlined, perhaps, by Alexis D’Tocquiville. To become American ought to be a conversion of ideology and values which must be confirmed in a covenant bond with other Americans.
But, the alt-right correctly conclude, being an American means nothing at all. There is neither an identity based on common ancestry nor conscious conversion to a faith or ideology which define America. And so the left have made America mean nothing and a nation based on nothing disappears. Their hypocrisy on the matter of identity politics has destroyed all of their moral high ground.
In 1982 I saw a future in which America continued to betray its faith and ideals, thus opening the door to dissolution and the rise of alternative forms of self identity. The alt-right is a manifestation of that.
It would be intellectually cheap to say they are racists. To say this would be to say that groups and movements based on the perceived shared interests of blacks or Jews or Hispanics were racist. The idea that white people could decide they had interests common only among themselves is completely defensible compared to other racially defined groups who make the same claims. Identity politics is the norm with all save white groups in America and with most peoples and nations around the world. It is the left which has argued over and over for identity politics based on race, albeit only selectively and for their political advantage. But you cannot argue identity politics for one group and not other groups.
In 1982 I saw a future new nation not based on race, but ideals and values. It is intentionally established as America and many other nations and states come apart and Western Civilization itself starts to become unravelled.
I saw a new and intentionally created national people among whom membership was recognized after being confirmed to be in covenant with that nation as a nation of people whose God is the Lord. Among this national people and their communities, people consciously chose their new non-racial ethnicity over all other natural identities and considered all their fellow nationals their peers, without distinction by ancestry or skin color. The ideals and covenant bound them, but to accept these ideals and follow them was a prerequisite to attaining standing by merit.
In my fictional story from 1982, identity politics takes root and America’s largest ethnic group, the white ethnicity, enters the fray and asserts its own collective rights and and interests. This sets the stage for the recreation of a race-based state that takes over parts of the old south.
Racism, the belief that race is real and your race is superior, follows racialism, which is merely the belief that races exist and have their own self-interest. The efforts by the left to use racialism (identity politics) for coalition building have come to a point in the real world where the premises of racialism, which say black or Hispanic or Jewish people have their own self-interest separate from the white race (which is demonized), are now being embraced by whites who say they also have their own self-interest as a racial community which is separate from those races.
Tired of being the bogeyman and tired of every culture being celebrated while theirs is demeaned, for many whites, racial consciousness grows and and more whites begin to embrace racialism in their own race’s self-interest, which leads eventually to racism.
The premise that ideals and culture, values and a way of life, which transcend bloodlines and race, because there is ONLY one human race, is defeated because the very notion that any nation or state would afford standing on the basis of actual adherence to its ideals is denied. Through identity politics among only “minorities” and efforts to redefine America in a way that betrays the values of, for instance, the Bill of Rights, the white person in America is left with only a racial identity as a vehicle for defending a way of life they rightly know is threatened.
It is a dangerous road. But, sociologically speaking, it makes sense.
I reject it.
I reject race. I reject the idea of race. But as a white person, at least that’s how the left defines me, I am keenly aware of the pull to cling to my “group” and protect its existence and honor. Even I, who have always rejected race and who envision a new nation defined by its faith and values and not by bloodlines, have sensed a growing awareness of a white identity. It is not a happy feeling. Not that I bear shame for my ancestry, I am proud of my ancestry, but because I believe that racialism and racism are dangerous to human Civilization and contrary to God’s laws.
The idea that we can be defined by anything but our merit or that we would associate on the basis other than shared values and standards makes us savage beasts. The left have cooked this brew and we will all be forced to eat it.
If my prophetically inspirational story proves true, as ever more it has (and I am sad to see that), then the only way for many to escape this mess will be to claim and adopt a new intentional ethnicity based not on race or biology or even statehood but, rather, covenant bonds. In America, according to my story, people will adopt this new intentional ethnicity (and so will people around the world), because they reject racialism and racism and yet also because they embrace covenant as the basis of ethnic union and identity, covenant that is rooted in shared faith and values, shared ideals, and and a shared way of life that are explicitly defined. (Again, if my prophetically inspirational story turns out to be more truth than fiction.)
When you remove covenant bonds based on these things as the basis of a nation, then all you are left with is racialism and racism on one hand or ideological dogmatism on the other hand. In trying to destroy America’s covenant values so that they can create a new leftist ideological basis for a new America, the left has had to use identity politics. But, too late, they have destroyed the foundation before they could establish their new ideology, leaving only identity politics to fill the void.
I do not blame the alt-right. Their emergence is inevitable and was only made possible by the cultural arson inflicted on America by the left, and by their insistence that they could encourage identity politics among only their targeted groups while denying that white people even had any right to return the favor in kind.
The America which I saw flying to pieces in my 1982 vision is fast emerging today. The battle is on and yet none of the defenders of our Christian ideals, which alone hold hope for our Union, have come forward to join the fray. The end could very well be what I saw then, and it will not go well for anyone who is not prepared to weather the storm.
UPDATE SEP 3, 2022
The “alt-right” may have seened to fade, though to the left this bogeyman is the caricature of everyone they disagree with. But I feel strongly the backlash to white guilt, wokism, CRT, the alt-gendered anticulture, and the raging authoritarian left will awaken this again, perhaos in a more powerful way.
The issue is not for Freedomists, Bill of Rights Americans, to avoid racism or racialism so we don’t become an easy target for a media lynching. The issue is for us to not do that because it is morally reprehensible and is an abomination to God, every bit as foul as the child grooming garbage being pushed by fake teachers who are really subversive political hacks in the employ (not formal, de facto) of the Democratic Party machine.
Every human being regardless of ancestry, race, gender, creed, religion, citizenship status, and whatever pursuasion owns and ought to respect liberty as we find it in the original spirit and intent of the US Bill of Rights! Every. Singe. One.
We must believe this, insist on this, and defend this and though the leftwing neomarxist corpostaters won’t hesitate to blood libel us, we will press on knowing that bigotry and intolerance are truly anathema to any Freedomist.



