Publisher Bill Collier

Anger At Sociopaths In Power Fuels Growing Militancy, But Is Our Union In Peril?

Bill Collier August 3, 2021

Will the anger over the authoritarian responses from sociopaths in power threaten to destroy our country and turn us into Bosnia 2.0?

The fact YouGov did a survey of over 1700 voters and found 47% of Republicans believe force may be needed to prevent the left from destroying the American way of life is no doubt being used by the authoritarian left to further promote the narrative their political opponents are rebels and insurrectionists who should be outlawed. But this over-reactionn only “proves” that those who would foment upheaval are “justified” and “right” in their claims.

We have to ask, will this backlash against the authoritarian left and their woke corporate neocommunist totalitarianism, and the left’s over reaction, destroy our country as we plunge into violence against each other? And, if so, who and what it to blame?

We have been predicting that the deliberate and irrational efforts by authoritarians, mostly on the left, to delegitimize and demonize their opponents, painting them as racists or nazis and other epithets, would eventually push some over the edge, leading to militancy and instability. The targets of the freedom takers clearly feel that their options for peaceful redress are narrowing.

Donald Trump, conspiracy theories, misinformation, fake news, and all that are, regardless of other claims, merely symptoms of something which has as its cause the sociopathic behavior of the authoritarian left. Their conduct wherever they have power, in places like the schools and universities and the state of California, is grossly anti-American and totalitarian, frankly, to an extreme that is beginning to look like the corporatized modern version of a neosoviet dictatorship. The woke cancel culture with its opaque rules that are unevenly applied and always only to help Democrats win power by legerdemain and chicanery is a mass sociopathic hypnosis of useful idiots who becomes the drone warriors of an insidious revolution against freedom and basic humanity.

Even if and when we raise questions about some rather outlandish claims on the right, we are aware that the spread of such claims is just a sign of a deeper problem that isn’t the fault of the claims makers. That problem is the sociopathy of the left, whose leaders and whose radical base are every day assaulting faith, family, and freedom, in that order, and whose only alternative offering is a future neosoviet inperium made up of an alt-gendered, undifferentiated mass controlled from the top through monopoly corporations and power mad bureaucrats.

Democrats live in a bubble and while all sides tend to do this, it is far worse for Democrats who rarely if ever even countenance any perspective other than their own. Nobody in power challenges them. And so they act like their opponents have no say, no legitimate right to respond, and also as if their actions cannot ever get a response of any mean from their opponents.

Quite simply, Democrats today imagine they can pass laws, corporate policies, community standards on monopoly platforms, or regulations and enact curriculum standards that all happen in a void and cannot be responded to by anyone who disagrees. Disagreement is treason to these people. Anyone who isn’t totally down with their revolution is an outlaw. They are, at present, as great a threat to humanity itself as any other major threat in our history as a species. Their outlandish totalitarian ideas and their destruction of faith, family, and freedom, in that order, would potentially lead to the collapse of human civilization itself.

There isn’t a “problem” Democrats don’t want to “solve” through dictatorial control over others and the transfer of wealth from the wealth producing workers to people who don’t earn it, starting with the billionaires who own the Democratic Party. This constant, knee-jerk totalitarian response to real, over-inflated, and imagined problems has begun to wear thin on people whose true north is to be found in a love for faith, family, and freedom as defined in the Judeo-Christian heritage of our country, a heritage being maligned and demonized by public schools which are run by totalitarian loons.

If, however, things spiral out of control, one can imagine armies, from multiple “sides”, tearing out the heart and soul of this land until our cities lie in ruins. This possibly has not been closer since the 1850s but it was foreseen by us way back in the 1980s as the sociocultural and political situation in this country had devolved.

Even if we disagree with and disavow such talk of or affection for the use of force to rectify these injustices by the authoritarian left, we are not surprised that their violations of human rights and human dignity and their war against human flourishing are fertile ground for such a backlash of anger. But backlashes of anger rarely produce solutions that are beneficial to most everyone most of the time, they can actually lear to a different kind of authoritarianism from the other side.

Indeed, the entire genesis of leftwing authoritarianism may be found in the previous century’s more rightwing versions of authoritarianism in which some of the actual social injustices, like racism and discrimination, became fertile ground for an equally authoritarian backlash from the left.

The Judeo-Christian heritage of this country is, we propose, sound and worthy of being upheld and advanced as a voluntary basis of our shared identity as a nation, to wit being an “American” by “ethnicity” is all about these values and convictions. This doesn’t mean other American citizens who don’t embrace this aren’t “Americans” of equal value, but the idea is that if “American” by ethnicity is defined on this basis, less than half of all US citizens are “sociocultural Americans” by spiritual disposition.

But the history of these United States is riddled with practices, policies, and events that positively betrayed our Judeo-Christian heritage, namely by not resognizing and respecting the inherent dignity and rights of every human being and by not focusing intentionally on the universal flourishing of our entire population and every single community and family in this land.

The consequences of our hypocrisy are that the authoritarian left has a cause and excuse not merely to demand fidelity to our historic moral orthodoxy as a free country of sovereign and independence persons but to accuse the very ideas we have collectively violated as being the root cause of actual social injustice. Where we may say certain places and population groups have experienced injustice because we failed to live out our Judeo-Christian worldview, the authoritarian left say that our Judeo-Christian heritage IS the problem and must be rejected and then replaced with their alt-gendered, atomized and yet collectivized civilization governed through powerful monopoly corporations and the government.

So our hypocrisy and inconsistencies spurred the social justice cancel culture revolution which is itself, through an even worse series of mass injustices against humanity itself, spurring a feeling of anger and reaction, hence 47% of Republicans feeling “patriots” may need to use force to stop this cancel culture war on their values, way of life, and freedom.

We propose that a voluntary return, starting with individuals, to our Judeo-Christian heritage, albeit with modern adaptations and a more inclusive application that serves all American citizens equally, is the better path than any resort to violence. The backlash against the sociopathic behavior of our top politicos and corporate owners, and their rabid authoritarianism, came as a result of our own collective failure to live up to our true manifest destiny as a commonwealth of freedom with liberty and justice for all based on shared Judeo-Christian beliefs, values, and convictions.

People seeing civil war as somehow preferable to the trend toward authoritarianism by the woke corpo-communists of the Democratic Party may not realize that without a full-hearted return to first principles on their part no real lasting change is possible.

But will the fact that such a plurality of people on both sides who believe force may be necessary against the other side lead to violent upheaval? While we would say that this isn’t an immediate risk, it is becoming a growing risk both to the stability of the US and the global systems of trade and collective security that depends upon a strong US military with global power projection.

The “doomsday clock” that might countdown how close we are to a fatal breach of our Union might not by quite at 11pm, but it is well past 10pm and the clock appears to be ticking onward without any sobering sense of what is at stake. The angry victims of the totalitarianism of the left are not resorting to their own core values in a meaningful way beyond voting and the angry left who keep fighting old wars are not sobering up to just how badly they are miscalculating the response their actions will engender.

If either side or both sides sober up, these threats to our Union could disintegrate rapidly, but as we see hardening of positions and the growing militancy of one side spurring an increase in militancy in the other side we recognize that the growing potential for real upheaval.

This is neither necessary nor inevitable and, for now, not a likely possibility. If indeed a serious rupture were to occur, it would be a tragic comedy of errors on the part of one or both sides, therefore we rate this as an emerging threat but not a serious possibility.

Fuel the movement toward the restoration of full freedom for all Americans! JOIN US NOW!

The Vaccine MAY Be Safe, But…

Bill Collier August 2, 2021

Lost in the angry retorts by those opposed to the Covid-19 vaccines is a simple truth: over 99% of recent Covid-19 deaths are unvaccinated individuals. To argue “the vaccine doesn’t work” is a misnomer. But this isn’t the heart of the problem. The heart of the problem is the potential long-term effects of this virus and its long-term success at mitigating the virus.

The real tragedy may be that people who are reasonable and well-educated might reject an otherwise perfectly safe vaccine and then get sick and die without protection. On the other hand, upon what do they have to base their trust: the drug companies, the government, their doctors who depend on the former two for reliable information?

The thing is we SHOULD be able to rely on drug companies and the government for reliable information but we really cannot at this time. The corruption of corporate heads and politicians and their willingness to lie and deceive for self-gain, regardless of the consequences to others, is beyond comprehension.

It’s the opposite of “the boy who cried wolf”, it’s a case where “the boy who cried ‘sheep’ where it was really a wolf!” It may truly be a sheep, but many don’t trust the boy!

Trying to suss out the credibility of claims about the vaccine is difficult because we cannot know if all data needed to make an informed decision is accurate or even available. We know the parties asking us to trust them aren’t trustworthy.

We also know that, for now at least, the vaccine has been shown to prevent serious illness and death. This is a good reason to take the vaccine. The slowness of the FDA in approving the vaccine, the unwillingness of all parties to assume responsibility or make guarantees regarding the vaccine’s effectiveness, and the unavoidable fact this was a rush effort all cause hesitancy.

The response to the hesitant has only made matters worse. Shunning, shaming, and bullying are not useful.

The spread of false information attacking the vaccine has only made matters worse, but these falsehoods are thriving because of factors the powers that be could mitigate. The FDA could stop dragging its feet and either approve vaccine or stop its use, whatever the facts dictate. Someone, anyone, could actually assume legal responsibility for any harm caused if we find, like the polio vaccine, the vaccine is tainted. The government could come clean on the polio vaccine and its true impact.

People will likely die without the vaccine but mostly because the way this roll-out has been conducted doesn’t engender a level of confidence necessary to earn universal compliance.

A Plan For Saving America

Bill Collier August 1, 2021

The Freedomist plan to save America is a threefold approach:

– promote material independency and the increase of faith, family, and community

– promote local civic activism aimed at turning municipalities and counties into Freedom Sanctuaries that are self-sustaining and self-governing through a Town Meeting system

– develop an online and street level activist core which can mobilize thousands in any Congressional District and millions around the country

It is in part through our broadcasting of this vision and arming readers with reliable and actionable intelligence that the Freedomist hopes to gather enough supporters to fund this effort. As and when support grows, our intention is to invest in reaching and gathering people, providing them with key infrastructure to facilitate cooperation and collaboration, and to pay people at the state and Congressional District level to lead efforts to mobilize and support activists.

Without people on the street showing the banner of freedom and confronting the woke communists in a visible way that media cannot conceal, because everyone can see this, it is impossible to begin to reverse the tide of woke cancel culture extremism and the march toward authoritarianism. Our aim is to stop, reverse, and end the woke communist threat against our Union and its regimen of freedom for all citizens.

The very first step you can take to support this effort is to become a subscriber to The Freedomist for as little as $4.99/month. Subscribe now as we grow our audience and content and so we can implement this plan.

Why Did A Sailor Burn Down The USS Bonhomme Richard?

Bill Collier August 1, 2021

The dramatic fire that destroyed the USS Bonhomme Richard was, according to the Navy, allegedly started by a sailor. While the sailor’s idenity has not been revealed, and formal court martial has yet to be announced, it appears this was an act of sabotage. Moreover, their is evidenced of 3 different fires on theee different vessels in San Diego over a 15 month period prior to this major fire.

“The sailor was a member of Bonhomme Richard’s crew at the time and is accused of starting the fire,” Cmdr. Sean Robertson, a U.S. 3rd Fleet spokesperson in San Diego, said in a statement.

The charges “were brought forth against a Navy sailor in response to evidence found during the criminal investigation into the fire started on USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) on July 12, 2020.” The charges against the seaman apprentice are aggravated arson under Article 126 of the Unifrom Code of Military Justice and hazarding a vessel under Article 110.

“Evidence collected during the investigation is sufficient to direct a preliminary hearing in accordance with due process under the military justice system,” Robertson said.

“Vice Adm. Steve Koehler, who commands 3rd Fleet, is considering court-martial charges and has directed a preliminary hearing at which an impartial hearing officer will make determinations and recommendations required by the UCMJ prior to any further trial proceedings – including whether or not there is probable cause to believe an offense has been committed and to offer a recommendation as to the disposition of the case.”

The sailor, a Seaman Apprentice, had been held in custody at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif., before being released in November. At this time they are not in custody.

Pictured above- Federal firefighters assess damage in the hangar bay aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD-6) on July 15, 2020. US Navy Photo

What could some of the motives be? Some possibilities include a sailor disgruntled by the stress of being 2 years in dry dock and facing a deployment, a stressful scenario for many sailors. It could also be more ideological, ranging from right to leftwing radicalism, or even anger over the Navy’s constant and distracting “diversity training” which is clearly ideological brainwashing rather than useful instruction.

One possibility is that the Navy has a simmering problem with morale. We have already seen reports that morale is low, largely effected by the obsession of the command with convincing sailord to “bow to the rainbow” rather than focusing on combat readiness. The ability of sailors today to fight their ships is decidedly decreased over what it was 20 years ago.

This could either cause an angry reaction that, well not at all justified, is somewhat predictable. In that case, if indeed the sailor was disgruntled about the rainbow fascist indoctrination, the likely results could range from cover-up to conceal the problem to exploitation of the crime to double-down on the rainbow fascist indoctrination.

In the event the crime was motivated by leftwing or Islamist ideology, the true nature will be concealed with a focus on the sailor’s mental health.

The outstanding question is whether the Navy, in part through its obsession with ideological indoctrination, is brewing a massive morale problem that could lead to such acts of sabotage. This could either be a result of sailors’ trained to essentially hate their own country may be radicalized or because angry sailors rejecting ideological indoctrination lash out by committing crimes like this.

The opacity of the process by which this has been investigated and the fact the identity of the sailor is concealed and formal charges (as in a court martial) not brought, leads one to believe the actual circumstances and motive surrounding this incident are not useful to the Navy brass’s narrative.

Workers Are The Real Producers of Wealth: Why Don’t We Respect That?

Bill Collier July 31, 2021

In our society, according to the powers that be, the scope of your “freedom” as a wealth producing worker is strictly limited to how you choose to sexually pleasure yourself! Everything else is off the table because all you are ever allowed to be is a mindless, alt-gendered, undifferentiated and atomized commodity the ruling class can buy and sell. It is in fact the greatest crime against humanity in world history.

Bill Collier- I have never been a blue collar worker, except briefly as a teenager in a major printing firm, I have always been in sales and/or marketing and producing content with my brain. While I believe my efforts are beneficial to society, I am concerned that the economic structure of our civilization tends toward empowering governments and mega corporate ownership over the greatest producers of wealth, the workers.

On one hand, would-be blue collar business owners are encumbered with red tape that smothers them with regulations and then sucked dry with taxes that transfers wealth from workers to government bureaucrats and favored groups and backers of those in power. On the other hand, thanks to collusion and the concentration of ownership in business from the many to the few, the exploitation of workers and the limitations on their options keeps the average worker in their place with few real options.

Thanks to a relatively free market capitalism, we might say a 70% capitalism, outside the business enterprise, we see real wealth even for those on the bottom grow even as the gap between an average producer of wealth and the “owners” of the enterprise grows staggeringly in favor of the ruling class.

Quite simply, the free market capitalist system and ethos stops at the company door. Inside, the entire structure resembled a neofuedal satrapy lorded over by one or a few ultra wealthy people filled with hubris, ego, and a lust for greater conquests at the expense of average people.

Today’s wealthy ownership class who control most shares have become the most greedy and self-absorbed group of people in human history. Their constant virtue-signalling over social and cultural issues of no concern to working people or consumers may either be an outgrowth of their desire to control their world or an effort to paint themselves in a more favorable light regardless of their rapacious appetite.

The core principles of free market capitalism don’t apply to the worker or to the interior of the corporation that uses workers as a commodity. The very concept of “human resources” reduces workers to a “resource” of no concern to the owners, a commodity to be bought and sold for maximum gain to its owners. The mentality is truly “we the majority shareholders own you the actual wealth producer and can buy and sell you for our benefit alone.”

Even as these ruling class snobs act like they own human beings, pushing them into increasingly inhumane conditions that violate their very human dignity, they deign to dictate culture and to punish those mere serfs on their fiefdoms who don’t comply with their radical plans to produce an alt-gendered, undifferentiated and atomized mass of poor working slaves who have no faith and no family and little real agency beyond their sexual gratification.

Ask yourself why the ruling class, the great reset people who don’t want you owning anything, so desperately push woke cancel culture as an assault on traditional faith and family.

You think you and all your pronouns, your whole alt-gendered undifferentiated atomized self, isn’t exactly what the new robber barons want?

They ALL push your “edgy” ideas and even deplatform those who don’t think we need 500 “genders” or to abandon faith and family. The ruling class favor your “edgy” ideas and punish people who don’t agree with you and you are too arrogant to see how you are being played.

Nobody cares what you identify yourself as or who you love, they just want to be a part of that. What we do want and demand is equal respect for our views and legal sanction and protection for our way of life, which is rooted in faith and family according to millenia of moral and doctrinal orthodoxy.

It’s amusing how people being transformed into serfs by the ruling class can’t see how all their “edgy” ideas are quite literally created, favored, and imposed by those who wish to enslave them. You hate God, your traditional parents, your country, and tradition itself and you imagine you are free and advancing into the future toward a new evolution of humanity. You aren’t. It’s just the latest slaver trick to turn you into a lust-craved animal whose only desires are limited to shallow self-pleasure.

Again, NOBODY CARES about your pronouns or what gender you are today or who you sleep with or love. Nobody. But we do care about deeper and more important things and while you can do as you like, we just won’t play your little game or buy into your cultural concepts, which we find destructive and more conducive to slavery. We are FOR our way of life and for total freedom for all, we are not against your way of life or how you define yourself or who you love.

The issue here is not whether you can decide things like sexuality or gender or whatever on your own terms, it is whether anyone is allowed any greater freedom than this and whether those whose values are rooted in faith and family are treated equally and fairly or whether they are somehow forced to adopt the new atomized alt-gendered “culture” on pain of being canceled if they don’t.

Workers, the real producing class, lose agency and increasingly, after decades of advancement, face real contractions of wealth, home ownership, and agency which also destroy their dignity and violate their basic human rights. The great reset equals the cultural demise of faith and family as a means of pushing workers into serfdom. The entire purpose of the rainbow dictatorship over culture, aiming at faith and family and creating an alt-gendered undifferentiated and atomized mass of serfs, is to enslave almost everyone save the ruling class!

The ruling class, working through both parties normally, has also hit on the idea of a new form of communism, combining the “woke” propaganda of rainbow dictatorship with a collaboratively planned monopoly economy in partnership between the corporate ownership class and the top politicos. Woke communism is the transfer of wealth from the many to the few all while invoking the language and utopian promises of socialism and all while destroying faith and family through a new push to impose an alt-gendered over-sexualized culture that turns most people into little more than animals in constant heat!

Workers are the true producers of wealth and our top-down, centralized planned economic hegemony doesn’t respect them at all. The ruling class in this country are working toward a day when you own nothing, when you are owned, and your only “freedom”, is to have sex with anyone or anything that suits your hyper-sexualized desires.

Concentration of wealth and assaults on faith and family are all part of a grand scheme by the ruling class to turn workers into serfs. People like Bezos, Zuckerberg, Tim Cook, Warren Buffet, et al, all agree with the great reset, all promote “woke” cancel culture assaults on faith and family, and all tend to support a one-party rule over America that favors them and turns workers into undifferentiated atomized individuals who are mere cogs in the machine.

All the “edgy” people armed with a dizzying array of pronouns, think they are the future and the next evolution. But this uncultured attempt to turn every person into an over-sexed, atomized, and undifferentiated being without agency is as old as slavery itself. It is the past, it is barbarism, and it is devolution that shows total contempt for the workers.

Great Reset Update: Eviction Moratorium Ends, Millions Could Be Effected

Bill Collier July 31, 2021

The moratorium on evictions, which was created by the CDC during the height of the pandemic outbreak, has ended in part due to a Supreme Court ruling saying the CDC has no authority doing this and because Congress could not pass an emergency measure extending the moratorium.

There are over 5.7 million Americans behind on their rent and over $20 billion in rent is past due. What is concerning to many is that despite all these federal payouts in the trillions nothing was provided to assuage the problem, as in the $20 billion in unpaid rent which caused real financial problems for landlords.

Why were there no provisions to assist small landlords who could not afford to weather losing so much income in order to keep the real estate market more stable? The answer is that the ruling class are positively hostile to anyone save the very rich owning real estate in this country, their goal being the end of private ownership outside of government and mega corporate entities they, the ruling class, control.

Landlords, many of whom are middle class owners of one or a few properties, have been unprotected and losing money while renters have been unable to make ends meet due to the government mandated lockdowns of the entire population. The balance between the landlords who went without income and the renters who lost income had never been struck.

The moratorium didn’t end the running up of a tab, renters who didn’t pay anything still owe full rent for all those months. In some cases, renters have actually abused the property and took advantage of the situation and could not be evicted even in those cases.

But many landlords are also major owners of multiple properties and renting homes to the massss has become an industry of its own, often offering poorer quality residences for increasingly high costs to maximize profits. These speculative landlords drive up prices for housing, making it more difficult for the lower income among us, which, ironically, means the same house or apartment they overpay to rent cannot be bought even if they have been renting it for years.

Home ownership is an essential elment in achieving total material independency but too many obstacles to home ownership, including how we do credit checks, taxes, and real estate speculation are making home ownership impossible for poorer people and the young.

Sympathy for the landlords is just not there because most people see a typically wealthy owner of multiple properties who overcharges renters and speculatively buys multiple properties, driving up prices which hurts the very people forced to rent from them. But many other landlords are not rich people or speculative real estate buyers, they are average people who may rent out a room or a guest house or property they inherited.

The collision now between landlords of every type and renters who have either been unable or unwilling to pay is real and the potential for a new housing crisis, not to mention a rush on the courts, is substantial. Could the smaller landlords be forced out of their business only to see mega corporate landlords take over more property and continue a trend away from individual ownership to corporate ownership of real estate?

The “great reset” claims “you will own nothing and like it”, and the disorganized way this moratorium is ending may contribute even more to the transfer of wealth and ownership from the many to the few. This does not bode well for the cause of promoting individual material independency as a means of increasing freedom for all.

Legally, this moratorium was unfounded and many renters did in fact receive substantial federal money allegedly to sustain themselves, so at least some payment to these landlords could have been made. But the entire issue points to the core problem that property ownership itself is in jeopardy and the rules, laws, and regulations as well as taxes surrounding property ownership are more conducive to the concentration of ownership in few hands than the material independency of individuals.

Why I Remain Unvaccinated

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

Bill Collier- My hesitancy on the vaccine is more rooted in the rather outlandish and, frankly, authoritarian responses and the refusal to countenance real questions, than anything else. Add to that the fact this is a new vaccine, the same government pushing this has done some really awful things, and the fact now things shifted from the vaccine providing immunity to now vaccinated people have to mask up again.

The “vaccine fascists” need to re-learn the American’s Creed to understand why bullying, shaming, and coercing undermine confidence and only engender resistance. The homeland of “give me liberty or give me death” isn’t going to, I hope, give up on its essential creed, not even for a virus that has a less than half percent mortality rate.

I genuinely feel there is no real overwhelming guarantee this thing is as beneficial as claimed in the long term or that it may not have some serious problems. I may be wrong, but claling me a conspiracy theorist or canceling me will not only fail to convince me and be morally reprehensible for you to do, it will convince others this whole vaccine regimen isn’t to be trusted.

I can be convinced. I do notice that 99% of recent deaths are people without the vaccine. But, honestly, will this remain the same? It was also reported the Delta variant is more lethal, exact numbers not explained, and more contagious. This is also concerning.

Browbeating me or mandating this only fills me with alarm. Again, I DO NOT TRUST a government that has repeatedly and dangerously lied to me all my life! Too often the government claims their measures are beneficial and decades later Congress passes a resolution begging forgiveness.

The much vaunted polio vaccine infected almost 100 million people with a cancer-causing virus, but to this day the government, the same one extolling the vaccine of the hour, refuses to seriously study and reveal how many lives were lost or how many people got cancer and had their lives ruined. How can we take them seriously?

My hesitancy decreases and I am ready to start the process, then some authoritarian nub screeches terrible things about the unvaccinated being worse than Satan, or something outlandish like that, and I recoil. I don’t know why the ruling class are so adamant about this but I doubt anyone, ever, thinks these louts care about anything but being more powerful. But the fact there is such a full press on and it has so many authoritarian features fills me with dark suspicion.

The trend further away from treating people with dignity and respect, tolerance for all views and creeds, and respect for human rights, amd the trend toward ever more partisan and authoritarian responses meant to gain political advances, has consequences. A plurality of people, who are already demonized by the leftwing authoritarians for not being “woke” enough, just can’t see why they should trust people who call them nazis and racists at the slightest hint of disagreement!

Vaccines may indeed eliminate this vurus as a serious threat. The unvaccinated may spur new varieties that can render the vaccine useless for everyone else. This is a real concern. On the other hand, unlike polio, which had a 5-10% mortality, this virus has a very small mortality rate. What this means is that if we discover, too late to fix it, that all these vaccines do real long-term harm, we could see more harm done by the vaccines than by the virus over, say, a 30 year period.

I am not claiming we will see such harm. But, in light of the government’s predilection to lying, and in light of the continued refusal to face the truth about tainted polio vaccines, being skeptical seems quite reasonable. I am proposing that polling back the demonizing and authoritarianism, on all fronts, may be far more conducive to winning people over to get the vaccine. Doubling down on the hate and authoritarianism will only further fragment society and increase distrust.

This notion a few talking heads are convincing people the vaccine will make them grow two heads and that’s why some remain skeptical is garbage. It’s like when someone is not complying with your wishes and you accuse them of letting someone else convince or control them instead assuming they can think for themselves based on the facts as they see them.

Perhaps the accusers bear the mental illness of letting others dictate their beliefs through propaganda and are just projecting on to others. But trying to convince me this is safe in the long-term, as well as effective, means total transparency, being treated with dignity, and a total commitment to my right to choose my health options.

I want to believe this is safe and effective but when the argument against any questions about these things is canceling people, authoritarianism, and constant one-sided propaganda, it’s not conducive to building trust. When I see everyone, from government to the manufacturers, is absolved of all responsibility if it does you harm, this is disconcerting. Everyone demands we take the vaccine but offers neither an iron-clad guarantee nor assumes accountability and responsibility if they fail to deliver.

I may get the vaccine. I am praying God protects me if I do and even if, once again, we find the government failed, the vaccine didn’t work or was tainted, and the government tries desperately to cover it up for 40 years before Congress passes a resolution apologizing for our country’s misdeeds.

The Right To Cluster

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

We believe and assert that every person within their own familial or other bonds, and through freewill participation by all persons involved, owns a right to cluster together with other people on a private basis to nurture and promote their way of life. Everyone who disputes this right has an authoritarian psychosis and cannot properly and humanely interact with society outside of their innermost lust to dominate their neighbors.

It is, as with every right, impractical to say this right has no limits but, like all rights, those limits must exist only where the practice of this right overwhelmingly harms the rights of others, uses coercion, or involves a tort against another person.

A right to cluster may be somewhat limited by the practical necessity of ensuring a right to fair housing. As an example, if the only housing for many miles is controlled by these clusters of people and you don’t fit in with any of them, then, practically speaking, your right to fair and equal access to housing is, at the very least, undermined. That being said, the likelihood of this every occurring may be slim as natural market forces will compel even clustered living groups to lease residential space to the public under fair housing laws as a way of offsetting costs.

Clustering is not isolating. If you cluster with other people you don’t cut yourself with others outside you cluster group. The world is too interconnected to allow for isolation in clustering but it is also too top-down to neglect the use of clustering as a way of increasing your resources and support in the face of top-down efforts to control you.

What we are asserting is that a cluster of people, and we generally think 120 adults of the same mutual affinity group (the IRS calls it a fraternal bond) is the upper practical limit, has every right to dwell together and make membership in their mutual affinity group a basis of freewill participation. A cluster is not a large-scale group (like an entire mutual benefit, refugee support, and missions society), that is a freewill participatory association, which we also own a right to form. A cluster is a body of people with a mutual affinity bond that is capable of acting as a larger extended multi-family household community that can be self-governing and achieve mutual self-reliance and self-sustainability.

Clusters of people may be a collection of people who live near each other and who create shared spaces and common facilities both for mutual benefit and shared purposes. They will tend to be a combination of residential and non-residential participants who revolve around 120 or so adults of the same affinity group all of whom feel and act as a familial community.

A cluster may in fact include people who are not part of the core affinity group, such as staff, people being housed as refugees, people leasing space, friends and family who reside with members, and children of members who live on site. To cluster is to live more freely and to have the pooled resources and mutual support needed to live in a more luxurious manner than your present means might allow.

People can cluster, people should cluster, people have a right to cluster, and as our shipwrecked civilization flounders into crisis after crisis, people will be compelled by necessity to cluster. It is for this reason we assert this right now, the right to cluster together with others in a familial bond based on a mutual affinity or identity.

How might clustering be abused? Namely, we may see people try to cluster in larger and larger groups in order to essentially discriminate against others. They may only want white people, they may hate people who aren’t monogomous and heterosexual, they may hate Muslims, they may hate Christians or Atheists, and on and on.

Scrutiny of clusters is morally justified to prevent these torts against others, who have an equal right to exist and live, or cluster, and who, within the broader community, must be accorded all the same rights and respect as everyone else. But a cluster of up to 120 adult members and everyone attached to them in a neighborhood setting is not a violation of anyone’s rights.

Within the Upadaria project, we emphasize pluralism to such a degree we encourage Upo Clusters, what we call Shireholds as a group and Estates or Castles for larger single clustered living hubs, to actually set aside space for leasing to the public based on fair housing laws. We don’t, however, beleive it is justified to mandate this, although we strongly feel it is a good thing to do.

It is our conviction that a clustered living arrangement should have the following features (these are ethical standards, not coercive laws):

1. It is based solely on freewill participation within a clearly defined set of shared ideals, principles, practices, mandates, and standards agreeable to all who freely join the community.

2. It is not too large that all the adults members could not get together in person and form a concensus about governance, resource allocation, and the such. Thus around 120 adults begins to be an upper limit to a cluster.

3. It is positively for something, like its way of life or sociocultural identity, it is not based on hatred or violence toward others and it doesn’t promote hatred or violence toward others.

4. It is based on ideas and beliefs more than things like race or ancestry, even if its mutual affinity is based on some sort of nationhood or ethnic identity. As an example, a Scottish Christian mutual affinity may tend to attract people of Scottish ancestry but it would welcome anyone of any race or color who simply had an affinity for and a desire to live a Scottish-Christian way of life.

5. As much as it can, it sets aside around 10% of its housing options for refugees/people in crisis and 20% to be leased to the public under fair housing laws to serve others and prevent itself from becoming insular while contributing to the existence of fair housing access for all.

6. People who join own shares, not the physical building, and if they leave or must be removed, they are either duly compensated or they remain on site but their status changes. Unless they commit a real tort or crime, they are never shunned or shamed for ceasing their active participation.

7. Mutual self-reliance and sustainability are the chief material aims, the object being to assure the physical, emotional, and spiritual sustenance of all persons who are members or who are connected thereto, even people who lease space, and always on the basis of offering and providing, never imposing, such help and support.

Note: if done right, the public will crave leasing space from a Upo Cluster, a cluster based on the Upadarian nationality, because it will assure them of sustenance even during hardships and of safety during times of crisis or disaster.

That all being said, clustered living is an inherent right. A cluster of all black people or all white people isn’t our ideal and we feel these can become insular, prejudicial, and self-destructive, but the right to do things others think is wrong, provided it does no harm to others, cannot be denied.

The right to cluster is a new formulation, but it has always been an inherent right, we believe, even if unrecognized as such on a formal basis.

Authoritarian Islam Shunned By A Growing Plurality of Iranians

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

According to TFI Global, an India-based global news service, citizens of Iran are beginning to openly shun authoritarian Islam. The anti-regime protests are in their third week, despite violent responses, mostly over such things as lack of water due to a nationwide draught, lack of electricity, and Iran’s foreign policy which sees billions of dollars wasted on adventures that do not serve the Iranian people.

Demonstrators in major Iranian cities have called for the death of their leaders and an end to the religious system. One common cry is “no Gaza, no Lebanon, I sacrifice my soul for Iran”, a cry that has surfaced in almost every protest since the massive 2009 protests. For the most part, Democrats has essentially been soft on or turned a blind eye to such protests, for instance in 2009 President Obama did nothing to show any tangible support for the protests.

Deaths, injuries, and widespread arrests and detentions are continuously happening as vans show up in neighborhoods and pull out 500 activists at a time and then disappearing them. Far from causing the protests to stop without their now detained leaders, new leaders keep stepping forward and the protests persist. One openly wonders if some Democrats look on this oppression and wish they too could round up their opponents, based on the rhetoric of many Democratic leaders and the press who are using January 6th as a casus belli to oppress all Republicans.

It is hard to predict the stability of the regime which is being propped up by Russia and China and which the current US Administration seems to tacitly support and is willing to “negotiate with” to ease sanctions and further boost the regime. The alliance of authoritarians from China and Russia and even America’s Democratic Party establishment against freedom sees three distinctly different forms of authoritarianism colluding to prop up yet a fourth version of authoritarianism. It seems that what connects them is a fundamental belief that the few should lord over the many and that this is best for stability.

From America’s secular hedonism to Iran’s Islamist cultism, the common theme is that whatever the ruling class believes must and can be imposed by force on everyone. Any authoritarian government, or would-be authoritarians (the US is not an authoritarian state despite the outlandish and fantastical aspirations of the Democratic Party establishment and its lunatic fringe base), would naturally react against any popular uprising. This is the reason why the Democrats cannot bring themselves to side with the Iranian people in a meaningful and substantive way.

Azadi, meaning freedom, is the craving of what appears to at least be a growing plurality of Iranians and any craving for total freedom will be shunned by every authoritarian of every stripe, on principle. The problem for Azadi in Iran is that the movement is not presently capable of meeting force with force and nor does it have any tangible support from any outside power.

Private Intel For American Patriots

Bill Collier July 29, 2021

MCALVANY INTELLIGENCE ADVISOR

American patriots now have digital access to one of the oldest, most proven “private intelligence” reports on the planet. The McAlvanay Intelligence Advisor has been providing accurate, actionable intel to Patriots for over 45 years and is now available online to MILLIONS of Americans who need to know what’s REALLY going on and what’s coming.

The Freedomist has entered a joint venture agreement with our partners the publishers of this incredible private intelligence report. Accuracy, timeliness, and prescience are not words we commonly use when it comes to most “news” or even intelligence, but we’ve seen this report keep its readers from losing during the housing crisis and how it largely foresaw the turbulence of the past year.

You can now, for less than 77 cents a day, subscribe to the best and smartest “private intelligence report” available to patriots who love America! The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor is a BESPOKE level private intelligence report, delivered monthly, that will show you exactly what it REALLY happening and what is LIKELY to happen. The best way to be prepared is to KNOW the real score and to see what is probably coming down the road.

COMPARABLE SERVICES cost much more, but being less expensive is a reflection of their commitment to reach as many people as possible, it is not aa reflection of the true value of the service!

The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor has been around for more than 45 years providing real “intel” to average people. Its predictive analysis has kept thousands of readers far ahead of everyone else. As a subscriber, you will get a fully-baked personal :”intelligence report” that will show you what’s REALLY coming your way. It’s not “sponsored” by corporate interests and it’s not beholden to ANY “political” side, it’s only loyalty and focus in on its reader, YOU!

Here is a typical customer review- “I’ve been a subscriber for over a decade and MIA has, without a doubt, helped me preserve my most valuable assets and prepare for the bumps and turns before they happen, not during. It’s hard to put a price on that.” – Rebecca M.

Will the housing bubble return, is crypto the future, what new laws and regulations will pass, will international markets rise or fall? The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor is, bar none, the best private intelligence report any ordinary person can buy and that, we suspect, even intelligence community members pay attention to.

SUBSCRIBE NOW to the McAlavany Intelligence Advisor and start to get ahead of the curve immediately.

Go this page and SCROLL DOWN then CHOOSE YOUR OPTIONS or READ MORE on the main website.