PENTAGON LEAKER ARRESTED, BUT DAMAGE TO BIDEN ALREADY DONE – Just a few days after anonymous leaks from the Pentagon were released that exposes U.S. spying on allies (including Ukraine’s President Zelensky) and reveals the state of the Ukraine war is far more dire for Ukraine than the Biden administration has been letting on, the Biden-run DOJ found the perpetrator and arrested him. The perpetrator is Jack Teixeira, a member of the Massachusetts Air National Guard.
The aggressive and rapid action is in direct contrast to the DOJ’s efforts to bring leakers to bear that did damage to the DNC’s political opposition, including the leaker of the Supreme Court’s then upcoming decision to overthrow the unconstitutional Roe v Wade ruling that allowed human beings to murder other human beings by sub humanizing the unborn.
53 total documents were released, which have mostly been pushed aside by the DNC-run media to protect the administration. Instead, they focus on demonizing the man who, if the documents had damaged DNC opposition, would have been a protected whistleblower, if he had been “caught” in the first place.
House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) offered a defense of the leaker, tweeting “Jake Teixeira is white, male, Christian, and antiwar. That makes him an enemy to the Biden regime.” Her comment should have included, “and he opposes the DNC. THAT makes him an enemy to the Biden regime.” The DNC-led press is spending more ink propagating hate against Greene than covering the actual contents of the damaging reports themselves, reports that expose a rogue intelligence service that acts with no regard to Rule of Law, either American or international, something that is far more damaging to America and the American people than the damage its rightly doing at present to the DNC-led America we find ourselves having to be burdened with.
BIDENS GOT KICKBACKS THROUGH HUNTER’S BURISMA APPOINTMENT, FORMER OBAMA STAFFER CHARGES – A former Obama White House stenographer named Mike McCormick is claiming he has transcripts he took that prove that the Bidens have been using Ukraine as a kickback scheme to enrich their family wealth by trading American security for cash rewards. McCormick stated, “In February, I went to the FBI and filed one of their tips on their website. If you do that, and you’re lying to them, you go to jail. I’m not lying. I’m telling the truth, and I’m not going to jail. Joe Biden is a criminal. He was conducting malfeasance in office to enrich his family. Jake Sullivan is a conspirator in that, and there’s more… Obama officials involved in it, I believe.”
McCormick cited one particular incident involved with Vice Presidential Aid Joe Sullivan, who served then-VP Joe Biden. He exclaimed, “I’m sitting back there with a tape recorder. Jake Sullivan comes back and somebody asks about fracking. His answer is, well, we’re bringing a lot of American assistance over for fracking. Burisma was the direct beneficiary of that fracking, and that’s what I recorded, and that’s in a White House transcript.”
“In the transcript, you don’t know who Jake Sullivan is. It’s a senior administration official. I’m the witness that says Jake Sullivan is the guy who said it and he should be investigated because at the time Hunter Biden was on the board of Burisma and Joe Biden is bringing American taxpayer money to enrich that company and himself and his family.”
The allegation is simply that the Bidens used the “Big Guy’s” position in government, the Vice Presidency, to affect American policy towards Ukraine. The scheme was to pressure Ukraine to open the floodgates on fracking, a method of harvesting natural gas from below the surface of the ground.
The payoff would come for Burisma, who would, in turn, reward the Bidens by laundering money to the family through Hunter Biden, who was placed on the board despite having no working knowledge of Ukraine or the global energy industry.
McCormick has said he is willing to testify to anyone who cares to listen, including Grand Juries, and is convinced Biden will at minimum be impeached and removed, but more likely be imprisoned as well.
TEXAS BILL LOOKS TO DEFANG DNC POLLING WEAPONIZATION OF COLLEGES – A Texas bill introduced by Republican State Representative Carrie Isaac would make it illegal to set up polling places in colleges and universities. The bill was introduced ostensibly over school safety, but it has the effect of nullifying the DNC’s easy vote harvesting strategies, in part, and could serve as a roadmap for other Republican-led states to follow.
AIR FORCE WILL MISS ALL RECRUITING GOALS IN 2023– Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall warned “We are currently projecting about a 10% shortfall this year in the active Air Force and more in the Guard and Reserves.” He claimed the “retention numbers are looking good.” The Air Force has recently injected the DNC-CCP’s unofficial-official party ideology we here at the Freedomist refer to as Woketarianism, which has led to believe the deficiencies are a reflection of the Air Force “getting woke and going broke.”
The Biden Administration released a statement confirming their intentions to use $2 billion to fund anti-American activism aimed at suppressing election votes and protecting fraudulent DNC votes. The plan includes funding for targeting “online harassment,” which we Americans understand to mean any expression that denies the DNC-CCP anti-American narrative.
The funding targets leftist cities where the DNC-CCP is in full control of the ballot counting process, assuring them free will to create the necessary “votes” to win any national and state election where DNC-controlled cities represent the majority population, creating more and more existential divides between America and its DNC-infested, occupied cities.
After announcing plans to create an anti-white panel of operatives within the Biden cabinet through its so-called “equity boards” in an effort to further divide Americans and push for racial violence, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has announced plans to distribute billions of dollars to anyone not white under the cover of “correcting” discrimination.
The DNC is determined to bankrupt America by continuing to drive up the national debt. With the Republicans winning the House and promising to stop expanding the legal debt limit, the DNC is plotting to print a $1 trillion coin as a workaround to continue to drive the country into debilitating debt. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) is introducing legislation to preemptively make such a move illegal.
Project Veritas recently made a stunning announcement that it was placing its founder, James O’Keefe, on paid leave after a board meeting in which the members voted to destroy their own company.
It appears O’Keefe was dragged before a court of Karens, with no rebuttal opportunity, to hear the complaints of his employees, who complained the hard worker was too hard on them. The move followed O’Keefe’s recent evisceration of Pfizer, in which he exposed their work to continue to produce new strains of Covid-19.
The Karen court allegedly subjected O’Keefe to six hours of unsubstantiated complaints, then summarily executed their founder, in a bid that is surely seditious in nature. The board knows full well O’Keefe IS Project Veritas. To remove the man that IS Project Veritas is to terminate the company, plain and simple.
It is a dead body with its head missing, gushing blood and appearing in its death thralls to still be alive.
O’Keefe recently fired two employees, both of which were reinstated by the board.
The vulnerability O’Keefe faced was forced on him by the Federal government, which requires non-profits of certain types of which Project Veritas is to create boards that have the power to remove the founder. It’s a backdoor way for DNC activists to infect the host and kill it from within, which is what this appears to be.
By Bill Collier- Led by a mystical cult leader, Klaus Schwab, who insanely dreams of a world where the little people eat bugs, rent everything and own nothing, and are essentially stuck in their 15-minute walking neighborhood, the World Economic Forum has presented itself as the face of modern totalitarianism. The open aims of this organization, which also openly brags about its active subversion of many governments and most major corporations, acting as a monopoly cartel of sorts, read like a poorly written James Bond novel with a cartoon villain.
It is clear, the climate and alt-gendered lunacy, and revamped neomarxist ideology where the communist state is now run by neocommunist corporate cartels, fascist-style to some degree, and other equally bad ideas have become the mother’s milk of a new global fascist dream of unlimited power and control by the few over and at the expense of the many.
Only in the 1930s and 40s, and to some degree the 50s if we count the Spanish fascists, did the raw totalitarian ideas of fascism take the mask off. The fascist regimes of that era made no pretense of democracy or anything like that, as the Soviets and the left did, covering their totalitarianism in that thin veneer of democracy and social justice. But today’s neo-Marxist/neofascist hybrids invoke climate change hysteria on one hand and their alt-gendered anticulture, on the other hand, both to excuse and guide their agenda. It is an agenda that will only enrich the planners and authorities while rendering the masses as something no better than cattle.
The WEF lunatics are flying about in their private jets, making their own “carbon footprint” ten or one hundred times that of the individuals who they demand surrender ever more of their rights and wealth to those self-same elitists. But for all their confidence, the WEF is nervous because the mere plebs are rebelling against their agenda: questioning the climate change prescriptions which would decimate them and lead to global depression and starvation, questioning the wisdom of their alt-gendered anticulture, and overall questioning the rise of an unelected bureaucracy as the new masters of the world.
Never before in history have so many wicked souls gathered to advance as openly destructive an agenda as the WEF is advancing, policies that would lead to mass starvation around the world, without nary a sop to common decency or any sense of popular support for their plans. So-called “clean energy technology” and “net zero policies” would not seriously impact climate but would lead to massive human suffering in a man-made global catastrophe such as has never occurred in human history, making even Hitler’s genocidal mania less destructive ny comparison.
When the WEF see a growing plurality, perhaps as much as 25% to 40% of the population in many countries, and perhaps nearly half of the people in the US, emerge who absolutely oppose every aspect of cimate change hysteria, race-baiting theories that engender division and hatred, and alt-gendered anticulture nonsense being peddled to kids to groom them to become sexual objects to perverts, their only response is alarm. Their concern is not that they may be unpopular and most people don’t really support or want their agenda but, rather, that they must find ways to thwart and suppress such growing opposition.
The WEF is essentially scared that YOU might be waking up to their agenda, seeing how every institution is in lock-step with this new globalist fascism and that you are potentially looking for an exit ramp off of this highway to hell. They are not at all thinking that maybe the voice of a growing plurality consensus of people who view their agenda as anathema to freedom might have wisdom. They do not even consider better, more egalitarian and popular ways to reduce mankind’s impact on the environment, such as promoting individual and local sustainability that actually empowers everage people and communities.
In terms of their stated aims to somehow save the world from temperature changes which they claim they can predict despite decades of being wrong, their prescriptions would shift all wealth and power to them at your expense and in the end achieve none of their claimed results. A sci-fi movie about an evil global empire that snuffs out human rights and renders everyone cattle owned by a few ruling class types could see all of this coming. It is cartoonish and yet brutal to a degree this cartoon should not be shown to children.
What the WEF hate the most are people who pursue maximum self-sufficiency through parallel economic, social, and cultural structures that can exist independently of all the institutions their type control. In their “Global Risk Report 2023” an outright neocommunist opines for the ruling class about such “threats”, all of which essentially come down to “we are right, we must sacrifice YOU to save the planet, and the really scary people are those who don’t buy our propaganda and vote the way we like.”
They claim that failing to achieve net zero emissions, by dint of essentially starving the population significantly through their policies, is worse than a nuclear war. The gravest threat to all this dreamy utopian purity resulting in a top-down world managed by this ruling class is you if indeed you defy their ideas and agenda and refuse to continue to remain economically tied to their system.
Climate action is stalled because there is a divergence between what is scientifically necessary and what is politically expedient, so they claim, and the counter is the use of the ESG score for investing whereby they seek to harness the power of global corporate behemoths to force people to comply even if they don’t agree or want it. ESG is a wacko neocommunist ideology disguised thinly as some sort of measure of a company’s investment opportunity, to wit more capital goes to woke corporations while those who aren’t WEF certified are starved of capital, all without reference to actual profitability. ESG stands for Environmental (their net zero insanity), Social (“social justice” via race-baiting and an alt-gendered anticulture), and Governance (which is global government). It is a brazenly anti-freedom syncretism between a sort of communism and fascism wed with old fashioned robber-baronism.
As people unify against garbage like the alt-gendered anticulture, net zero totalitarianism, and global corporate cartel monopolism, the WEF are searching for ways to demonize, marginalize, and outlaw the strongest voices against them. Our fate is to be put in our place, silenced, and turned into mindless and undifferentiated, atomized cogs in their international collective. But the rhetoric of this ruling class establishment about how they can thwart the emergence of effective opposition is as fantastical and unrealistic as their repeatedly disproven predictions about the climate.
The demoralizing effect, for instance, of their alt-gendered anticulture being forced upon children to sexualize and corrupt them, is calculated to render the masses a mindless and spiritually depraved mush of undifferentiated individuals locked into their matrix. Thus the response must be an economic and sociocultural divorce, inasmuch as is practicable, from all systems and structures which hearken unto every preachment by these lunatic and power-made elitists, who are very far from being elite if elite means excellent and without peer in terms of quality and achievement.
Indeed, anyone of truly elite status by their high character and levels of skills and moral probity would look upon the WEF’s underlying ideology as the same poison that motivated the likes of Mao, Stalin, and Hitler. To become financially and materially self-sufficient and to become independent of their systems and structures for sustenance is the path of freedom, a path these people cannot block, no matter how hard they try.
In previous articles, we have touched on the ideas for building “DIY” ground- and air-combat forces. Today, we will take a look at the naval aspect of this idea.
Water-based travel is not new. In fact, for the majority of human history, travel further than 100 miles in any direction was usually faster, cheaper and safer than overland travel, even if wide detours were necessary. Without getting into the physics of fluid dynamics, movement is a lot easier when nature is helping you along, especially when friction resistance is determined more by shape than by weight. It was not until the advent of railroads in the early 19th Century that land travel became faster and comparatively safer than travel by water.
River Landscape with Man in Rowing Boat and Tree-Lined Shore. Johannes Hermanus Koekkoek (1778–1851). 1800-1850. Public Domain.
However, when looking at the military dimensions of water travel, while there were early examples of purpose-built warships, such as the Greek and Roman “triremes”, the vast majority of ships were perfectly suitable for both military and commercial use. Mostly, this consisted for transporting troops, animals, equipment and other supplies. Because of the ships’ designs of these eras, most vessels were also capable of going fairly far upriver; this was the main tactic of Viking raiders, from the 8th-11th Centuries, whose “Karvis”, “Snekkjas” and “Drakkars” drew as little as 30in/762mm in draft.
Gokstad Ship, late 9th Century, Viking Ship Museum, Oslo. CCA/2.0 Generic.
As previously noted, however, after about 1860, a dramatic divergence began to open between purely military and purely civilian merchant vessels. Without restating those points here, by the end of World War 2, it seemed that the divide was complete and unbridgeable: “Warships” fought in wars, and civilian vessels supported the warships, while remaining mostly unarmed.
But, there lurked an exception: the PT Boat.
Patrol Torpedo Boat (PT) 658 transits past U.S. Navy ships at the Portland Rose Festival. US Navy photo. Public Domain.
Developed just as WW2 was starting, the “Patrol Torpedo Boat” quickly became famous as the heavily armed war vessel of WW2, on a weapon-to-tonnage basis. Not much larger than most commercial yachts, the PT’s were fully capable of sinking full-size warships – as long as their torpedoes worked. If there weren’t enough enemy warships around to sink, the PT’s could easily remove their torpedoes, and bolt on heavier cannons to destroy lightly armored barges and lighters, as well as extra machine guns, turning them into floating anti-aircraft batteries.
While the US Navy seemed to have forgotten the lessons of PT Boat warfare after the end of the war, that turned out to not be the case. While light-armed craft more or less vanished from the Navy’s inventory after WW2, that was due to the savage budget cuts and vicious organizational fights of the post-war years, more than because the Navy didn’t want the boats. Indeed, the Navy had to burn significant political clout just to help prevent the Marine Corps from being disbanded by an Army and Air Force that were battling for scarce funding.
As soon as the Vietnam War began to heat up, it was discovered that North Vietnam was supplying the Viet Cong and its own troops in the South by smuggling arms and supplies down the coast in civilian sampans. The solution to this were the “Swift Boats” – small, high-speed, aluminum-hulled boats, heavily armed with machine guns. With very shallow drafts, these fast craft were able to chase down almost any watercraft, and usually outgunned whatever they could catch. As well, they could land small parties of US and Vietnamese Marines or SEALs deep in enemy territory, doing great damage to areas the enemy had thought to be relatively safe.
Fast Patrol Craft (PCF, Swift boat) during riverine operation in Vietnam. US Navy photo. Public Domian.
After the war in Vietnam ended, the US Navy once again had to struggle for funding, and small combat craft went onto the back burner. But not completely. As funding improved in the 1980’s small combat craft came back to prominence, leading to the expansion of the Special Warfare Combatant-craft Crewmen (SWCC) career field in the Navy, and the development of the SOC-R. NATO partners took note, at least to some extent.
Like naval warfare and transport in general, small craft-based warfare is not new. In the modern era, say from 1800 to today, military raids against pirates operating from swampland bases with open canoes and boats was far more common than fighting large ships, à la Hollywood pirate films. Indeed, in World War 1, the “Battle for Lake Tanganyika” was fought and decided by a handful of small boats that barely qualified as life rafts; the largest vessel, the SMS Graf von Goetzen, was barely 235ft long; that’s short for a warship.
German steamship Goetzen before its warship conversion in 1915. Public Domain.
Likewise, Filipino guerrillas fighting the Japanese in their archipelago after Japan’s conquest of the island group in early-1942 made good use of small-boat smuggling tactics to make amphibious raids throughout the islands for three years, until the war ended. The Philippine government continued this successful strategy in the Huk Rebellion that followed the war, and both government and anti-government forces continue to use boats for the same purposes to this day.
Starting from essentially scratch in 1976, the LTTE quickly showed – much as the Islamic State would do, decades later – that all that was required for an insurgency to grow exponentially, was intelligent, cunning and quick-witted leadership…Even if they end up using straight-out terror tactics.
In its 25-year history, the LTTE’s “Sea Tigers”, with no more than 3,000 personnel at any given time, not only fought the Sri Lankan Navy to a standstill, sinking nearly 30 vessels, while also conducting amphibious raids, it conducted widespread “strategic support operations”, until the Sri Lankan military got serious, got its collective act together, and ground the LTTE down by mid-2009.
Slovenian fast patrol boat HPL-21 Ankaran (Super Dvora MK II class), 2009, of a type used by the Sri Lankan Navy. CCA-3.0
But – what about other groups?
While the LTTE managed to create a ferociously effective “commando navy,” the “Navy of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps”, has taken the direction of using masses of small “Boghammer”-type speedboats. Based on a design from the Swedish company Boghammar Marin AB developed in the 1980’s, the modern “Boghammer” has taken on the moniker to describe any improvised naval fighting vessel.
A speed boat (used in a terror attack attempt on 5 May 1990) in the Clandestine Immigration and Naval Museum, Haifa, Israel. CCA/3.0
As used by the IRGC-N, the Boghammer is armed with a variety of weapons, including RPG-7 type rocket launchers, as many as three 12.7mm heavy machine guns, recoilless rifles and 107mm multiple rocket launchers based on the Type 63 MRL. And these craft do pose a threat to major-nation warships, when used in swarms. After nearly ten years of study, it remains a problem that major-state navies – including those of the United States and Great Britain – don’t talk about in public.
That’s all well and good…but, what about “modern guerrillas”? The above examples, including the LTTE, were all either formally organized navies, or were at least funded on a regular basis. What about a small guerrilla force? What can they do on the water?
Quite a bit, actually.
While large, ocean going vessels are going to be mostly out of a small group’s reach, at least initially, acquiring civilian pleasure craft (through theft or “under the table” deals) that can be modified to carry weapons is not at all difficult. While craft as large as Boghammers are uncommon, they are not so unusual that they would be noticed.
There is, however, another class of vessel normally associated with major states that most people would not associated with guerrilla warfare: long-range submersibles – i.e., submarines…Specifically, drug-running “narco-subs”.
Narco-submarine captured by the Peruvian Navy in December 2019. Ministerio de Defensa del Perú. CCA/2.0.
While “combat submersibles” in the modern era begin with David Bushnell’s Turtle in 1775-1776, submarines have only played a pivotal role in naval warfare since WW1, and the first “Battle of the Atlantic”. Submarines have always been complicated and dangerous craft – there is always a solid chance that something will go catastrophically wrong while submerged. Survival rates when things like that happen at sea are never good.
Submarines are also expensive, in the extreme. As a result, few people imagine a threadbare guerrilla army being able to operate something as technically complex and ridiculously expensive as a submarine. Sure, there are “vanity” submarines out there, used to excursions by cash-rich vacationers, but surely no one is actually building submarines intended for combat.
Established navies, however, beg to differ – which is why they are spending significant amounts of money designing advanced harbor-protection systems…specifically to counter small combat submarines.
But, for our purposes, narco-subs are not that. Narco-subs are generally thought of as “semi-submersible”, in that they cannot “deep dive,” like a conventional submarine. Instead, they are designed to run at or just below the surface. And these craft are not small – narco-subs with cargo capacities of up to 17,000lbs have been captured. That’s a significant capacity for a “guerrilla shipyard”.
And, as hard as the militaries of North and South America try, they cannot catch them all; at best, one in ten are estimated to be intercepted. Worse, the drug subs are being much more sophisticated, diving deeper, becoming less detectable, carrying more, and extending their range, with some now being able to cross the Atlantic, to bring drugs into the waters of Spain and Portugal.
This is a serious concern, and not from the narcotics angle. While infiltrating “operators” into a nation (even the United States) is relatively easy, importing weapons and explosives is not. And 10-17,000lbs of weapons, ammunition and explosives at a time provides significant capacity for an attacker.
Indeed, since 2000, abandoned narco-subs – true deep-diving models – have been discovered in South America that have cargo capacities in the range of 20,000lbs or more, and with ranges of c.3,700km, more than enough to reach New Orleans from most of the South American Caribbean coast.
A fully-operational submarine built for the primary purpose of transporting multi-ton quantities of cocaine located near a tributary close to the Ecuador/Colombia border that was seized by the Ecuador Anti-Narcotics Police Forces and Ecuador Military authorities with the assistance of the DEA in 2010. Public Domain.
Making matters much worse, these craft are very difficult to detect at sea, because their hulls are made mostly of fiberglass and Kevlar; are painted sea-blue; and vent their engine exhaust along the bottom of their hulls before releasing it to the atmosphere, cooling it to the point of being indistinguishable from the surrounding water. Coupled to them running just below – or well under – the surface, this makes them virtually invisible to radar and sonar. In fact, the vast majority of the narco-subs captured were spotted by aircraft, running on the surface.
So – why is this important? It’s “just” drugs, right?
Well, “cargo” covers a very broad scope. Narco-subs don’t have to carry drugs, after all. Coupled to this, is the fact the fact that the South American and Mexican cartels operate these subs in alliance with guerrilla groups such as the FARC, among others. It requires no great leap of imagination to picture a scenario of a group like Revolutionary Iran or the I.S. infiltrating two- to four-hundred trigger-pullers into the US, hidden among the masses of illegal immigrants being allowed into the country by a criminally – if not deliberately – incompetent political establishment so arrogant, that they believe that the Rules of War do not apply to them.
Why is the author so vehement about this?
In 1974, R&D Associates – a think tank in Santa Monica, California – working under contract for the Department of Defense, produced a document titled A Soviet Paramilitary Attack on U.S. Nuclear Forces – A Concept (PDF link). The paper sketched out a threat concept to US strategic nuclear forces, wherein Soviet Spetznatz special forces could potentially infiltrate sabotage teams into the US to attack ICBM, bomber and nuclear submarine bases, simply by walking in over the borders from Mexico and/or Canada. It goes into detail of then-current estimated numbers of illegal aliens crossing the US border, who were not intercepted by the Border Patrol, and pointed out that enough four- to six-man teams could be infiltrated and housed by ‘illegal’ KGB agents just long enough to sabotage US nuclear forces in preparation for a Soviet first strike.
Very James Bond, yes?
This paper remained classified until 1995.
ISIS fighters execute Taliban fighter In the city of Jalalabad, December 2021. CCA/4.0
A threat – a clear and present one – exists against the United States, and its citizens. While some would argue that this author is “letting the cat out of the bag” by speculating on this in public, none of the information in this article is classified; there is no “whistle-blower” information here. If this author can find it, anyone can. You, the Reader, simply aren’t being told any of this. I will let you speculate as to why that is the case. The author, here alone, is unable to take corrective measures against this threat – it is the job of the Reader to do so.
All I can do, is warn you.
The Freedomist — Keeping Watch, So You Don’t Have To
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
