May 9, 2026

Web and Tech

Elon Moves to Conquer Twitter?

After Elon Musk held a Twitter poll asking if the Twitterati believes Twitter is a good place for free speech, the Ironman-wannabe entrepreneur stepped in with a few billion dollars to purchase over 9 percent of Twitter stock, making him the biggest stockholder of the DNC-CCP-compliant platform.

Now that he’s got that 9 percent, Elon is now a member of the Twitter board, which means he will theoretically have the most influence on what Twitter does next than any other person on the planet.  Robert Downey Jr. had to deal with Thanos snaps and Elon, apparently, has to deal with Twitter bans.  Let’s see if it ends better for Elon than it did Ironman (f in the chat for Robert Downey Jr.).

Perhaps Elon will use the hype to drive the stock up (and it is already shooting up after the Musk move) and then bow out, fatter than he was before, but so not Ironman if he does.

Elon Musk to join Twitter board after becoming top shareholder with huge 9.2% stake – World News

From www.mirror.co.uk
2022-04-05 13:54:59
[email protected] (Ryan Merrifield)
Excerpt:

 

Tech billionaire Elon Musk will join Twitter’s board after the Tesla and SpaceX chief purchased a 9.2% stake – worth $3billion (£2.3billion) – despite previously ridiculing the social media platform

Elon Musk – the world’s richest man – is set to join Twitter’s board after becoming the social media platform’s top shareholder.

It comes after the Tesla and SpaceX chief purchased a 9.2 per cent stake – worth $3billion (£2.3billion) – in Twitter Inc yesterday.

Prior to announcing the purchase, Musk had criticised the micro-blogging site for failing to adhere to free speech principles and said he was contemplating building a new social media platform.

But now the 50-year-old businessman cannot become the owner of more than 14.9% of Twitter’s common stock either as an individual shareholder or a member of a group as long as he is a director of the brand, according…

 

Read Full Article

US States Looking at TikTok’s Mental Health Threat to Kids

States Attorneys Generals are looking at TikTok as a potential source of mental health threat to our children and are sending messages to TikTok that it is being investigated to discern whether or not TikTok is a mental health risk to our youth.

TikTok is under investigation by a group of state attorneys general

From mashable.com
2022-03-02 21:35:02

Excerpt:

 

It’s been almost 6 months since Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen made headlines sharing internal company documents showing that its company Instagram was having a negative impact on young people’s mental health.

Now, a group of state attorneys general want to turn their attention to TikTok.

In a statement shared on Wednesday, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey announced the launch of a “nationwide investigation” into TikTok in order to find out if the mobile video sharing company is “designing, operating, and promoting its social media platform to children, teens, and young adults in a manner that causes or exacerbates physical and mental health harms.”

As part of the investigation, state attorneys general around the country will look into whether TikTok violated consumer protections laws and “put the public at risk.” They will also investigate whether the company knew about any potential harms its platform was causing to young people.

TikTok provided Mashable with a response to the investigation announcement.

“We care deeply about building an experience that helps to protect and support the well-being of our community, and appreciate that the state attorneys general are focusing on the safety of younger users,” said a TikTok spokesperson. “We look forward to providing information on the many safety and privacy protections we have for teens.”

According to AG Healey’s press release, the investigation will focus on TikTok’s strategies and methods to boost engagement among its young user base. This includes techniques used to increase engagement and the amount of time users spend on the app.

When Facebook whistleblower Haugen went public last year, documents showed that the company, now known as Meta, knew about the mental health harm its platform could cause young people. Meta even scrapped plans of making a specific Instagram platform for kids as…

 

Read Full Article

With Silicon Valley and other big tech companies seeming to mostly be choosing Ukraine over Russia in their recently-started war, nation-states of the world are learning lessons that might not be the kind Silicon Valley would like them to learn.

Tech is making it known that neutrality in war is not something nation states can count on tech for sustaining.  In the Ukraine War, Silicon Valley is finding itself choosing to block this agent but not that agent, is choosing to take this government on as a client but not this government.

All of the nation-states of the world are paying close attention to what tech can do, in general, to affect the outcome of war, but also, they are paying close attention to the type of power tech can have in impeding your nation-states war efforts should you find yourself outside the club.

These actions by tech, or Silicon Valley in large part, but hardly exclusively, are sending signals to nation states that will continue to accelerate the process of the nationalization of social media and the internet in general.  The cost for relying on obs (one big system) solutions is a potential loss of sovereignty as a nation-state altogether should the enemy that is invading you is in with the Silicon Valley crowd.

Tech Companies Help Defend Ukraine Against Cyberattacks

From www.nytimes.com
2022-03-01 00:50:58

Excerpt:

 

WASHINGTON — Last Wednesday, a few hours before Russian tanks began rolling into Ukraine, alarms went off inside Microsoft’s Threat Intelligence Center, warning of a never-before-seen piece of “wiper” malware that appeared aimed at the country’s government ministries and financial institutions.

Within three hours, Microsoft threw itself into the middle of a ground war in Europe — from 5,500 miles away. The threat center, north of Seattle, had been on high alert, and it quickly picked apart the malware, named it “FoxBlade” and notified Ukraine’s top cyberdefense authority. Within three hours, Microsoft’s virus detection systems had been updated to block the code, which erases — “wipes” — data on computers in a network.

Then Tom Burt, the senior Microsoft executive who oversees the company’s effort to counter major cyberattacks, contacted Anne Neuberger, the White House’s deputy national security adviser for cyber- and emerging technologies. Ms….

 

Read Full Article

Texas AG Goes After Zuckerberg Over Meta’s Facial Recognition Data

The Texas Attorney General is going after Facebook in the courts over its handling of user privacy data connected to a facial scan.  The AG, Ken Paxton, is alleging that Facebook collected the user data without permission.  He filed the lawsuit this past Monday, February 15th.  This lawsuit is one of a myriad of ways that Facebook and other international social media giants are facing from multiple US and other national governments as well.  This is a battle between the new power and the old, as the old still needs the new power, but they need to clip their wings.  However, the new power is far from vanquished, though I’d reckon its days were still numbered.

Texas Sues Facebook’s Parent Meta Over Facial Recognition Data

From www.nytimes.com
2022-02-14 19:42:42
Cecilia Kang
Excerpt:

 

The Texas attorney general on Monday filed a privacy lawsuit against Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, for allegedly collecting facial recognition data without the clear permission of users.

Ken Paxton, the attorney general, said the social network violated a state consumer protection law by repeatedly capturing and commercializing biometric data in photos and videos for more than a decade without the informed consent of users. He said the company also shared the data with third parties and failed to destroy the information in a reasonable time.

“Facebook will no longer take advantage of people and their children with the intent to turn a profit at the expense of one’s safety and well-being,” Mr. Paxton said in a statement. “This is yet another example of Big Tech’s deceitful business practices, and it must stop. I will continue to fight for Texans’ privacy and security.”

The lawsuit adds to Meta’s legal battles as local and national regulators take aim…

 

Read Full Article

Auto Draft

UK Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries has warned Mark Zuckerberg and other Social Media magnates that their days might be numbered if they don’t comply with the Online Safety Bill she is working to get passed.  The bill would make the social media platforms responsible for the illegal activity that takes place on its site, meaning the owners themselves could be arrested by the British police for crimes committed on their platform if the crimes take place in the UK.
The bill, if it becomes law, could effectivel end social media in Britain, as the cost to enforce your platform might be prohibitively expensive.

Social media bosses could face jail over UK’s new Online Safety Bill

From metro.co.uk
2022-02-07 09:45:35
Anugraha Sundaravelu
Excerpt:

Mark Zuckerberg could end up in jail if Facebook does not comply with new online safety laws, the UK Culture Secretary has warned.

Nadine Dorries warned that she was putting social media giants such as Facebook on notice with her Online Safety Bill which is supposed to force online giants to act on illegal content on its platforms.

On Friday, it was announced the long-awaited Bill had been strengthened with the addition of a number of new criminal offences to force social media firms to act on illegal content more quickly.

Offences such as revenge porn, hate crime, fraud, the sale of illegal drugs or weapons, the promotion or facilitation of suicide, people smuggling and sexual exploitation have been added to the list of priority offences that must be removed by platforms under the new rules.

Read Full Article

Auto Draft

It looks like Peter Thiel is making a move from business to politics, as he is leaving the now Meta, formerly Facebook, board, to throw his effort behind Donald J Trump’s political agenda.  He stepped away as he didn’t want his new political commitment to interfere with his role at Meta, or interfere with Meta itself.

Peter Thiel to leave Meta board to pursue Trump political agenda

From fortune.com
2022-02-07 21:23:55

Excerpt:

Peter Thiel, the tech investor and conservative provocateur who has advised Mark Zuckerberg for nearly two decades at Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc., will step down from the company’s board after Meta’s annual shareholder meeting in May.

Thiel, who joined the board in 2005 after an early investment in Facebook, plans to increase his political support of former President Donald Trump’s agenda during the 2022 election and doesn’t want his political activities to be a “distraction” for Facebook, according to person close to Thiel.

“He thinks that the Republican Party can advance the Trump agenda and he wants to do what he can to support that,” said the person, who was not authorized to speak publicly.

 

Read Full Article

Russians Show Us Why AI Without the Bill of Rights is a Police State

The Russian government has released some details of a recent experiment to utilize neural network artificial intelligence to attempt to trach down the locations of protestors based on video surveillance the AI was able to analyze.  The experiment netted the arrests of 454 protestors in 17 cities across Russia.  The expermient happened last year.

In nations such as Russia, and even more in nations such as China, these types of human control toys will be readily deployed with little to any fear of any ‘legal’ pushback from courts or citizens.  In nations such as America, so long as the DNC does NOT consolidate power, human control toys such as these run afowl of many of our essential Bills of Rights, the code of conduct from which our government’s power is legitimized.  Without honoring that code of conduct, the government loses its very legitimacy.

One of the reasons the DNC and its particular group of billionaires have latched on to the moral supremacism of “CRT” is that it is hoped the new moral code of CRT will override the Bill of Rights code of conduct of the American republic.  It’s a de facto act of sedition highlighted by this Russian report which demonstrates the existential danger of allowing our American lands to lose their Bill of Rights constraint on the state.

Neural networks tracked down protesters, Neuralink hinted at the start of clinical trials and other news from the AI ​​world

From thetimeshub.in
2022-01-24 11:28:10

Excerpt:

In 2021, artificial intelligence helped Russian police locate at least 164 rally participants. In total, law enforcement officers detained more than 454 people in 17 cities of the Russian Federation.
According to the report of the human rights organization OVD-Info, video surveillance cameras with an integrated face recognition system detected protesters on the streets, in the subway and near the entrances of apartment buildings.

According to Roskomsvoboda experts, biometric identification algorithms do not yet have a clear legal framework and are in the “gray zone”. This does not allow citizens to appeal the use of technology against them and requires the creation of a specialized regulation to determine who and on what basis can access the recognition system.

A single biometric the system will be integrated with the public services website
The Ministry of Digital Development of the Russian Federation signed a contract with Rostelecom to integrate the public services website with the state Unified Biometric System. The deal amounted to 1.2 billion rubles.

Read Full Article

Australia Might Force Google to Censor Us, Alphabet Claims

Google warns that defamation case ruling will force it to ‘censor’ the internet

From www.techspot.com
2022-01-24 12:05:00

Excerpt:

 

Why it matters: Google is warning that a 2020 ruling by the High Court of Australia could have a “devastating” impact on the entire internet, forcing the company to “censor” search results if a defamation charge is allowed to stand.

The Guardian reports that the case revolves around George Defteros, a Victoria defense lawyer who previously represented Melbourne gangland figures. He sued Google over claims that its publication of search results showing a 2004 article defamed him.

The article from The Age implied that Defteros had become more than just a lawyer for criminal elements but was also a friend and confidant, crossing professional boundaries. The piece also reported on the murder charges Defteros faced in relation to the killing of three men. Prosecutors withdrew the charges in 2005.

Defteros’ lawyers contacted Google in February 2016 and asked it to remove the article, but Google refused as it said The Age was a…

 

Read Full Article

Auto Draft

Australian prime minister loses control of WeChat account

From abcnews.go.com
2022-01-24 10:05:49

Excerpt:

 

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison has lost control of his Chinese-owned social media platform WeChat account and a lawmaker has accused China’s leaders of political interference

Morrison’s 76,000 WeChat followers were notified his page had been renamed “Australian Chinese new life” earlier this month and his photograph had been removed, Sydney’s The Daily Telegraph newspaper reported. The changes were made without the government’s knowledge, the report said.

Morrison’s office declined to comment on the report.

In response to a question from The Associated Press, WeChat’s parent company Tencent said that there was “no evidence…

 

Read Full Article

Auto Draft

14 States Attorney General have joined in antitrust lawsuit aimed at two of the great war machines of ecumenical leftism, Facebook and Google.  The companies are alleged to have colluded to assure the ad market remains uncompetitive and the prices remain favorable for them.

Google and Facebook CEOs colluded in online-ad sales scheme, unredacted antitrust lawsuit alleges

From www.marketwatch.com
2022-01-15 00:18:00

Excerpt:

 

Chief executives of the parent companies of Google and Facebook colluded to manipulate online advertising sales under a 2018 scheme nicknamed Jedi Blue and signed off on it, state attorneys general allege in newly unredacted filings.

The filings are part of a lawsuit filed in December 2020 by 14 state attorneys general led by Texas AG Ken Paxton, which charges Google parent Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL,
+0.64%

GOOG,
+0.47%

with “anticompetitive conduct.” Sections of the complaint that focused on interactions with Facebook parent Meta Inc.
FB,
+1.66%
,
along with other details, had been redacted previously, but most redactions were removed Friday after an earlier ruling in the case and showed top leaders of the two companies agreeing to work together.

“Google understood the severity of the threat to its position if Facebook were to enter the market and support header bidding,”…

 

Read Full Article

Main

Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!

Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here