Headlines

The Ruling Class Use Woke Communism To Push Election Hijacking As Law

Bill Collier July 20, 2021

The “election reform” pushed by the ruling class has all the hallmarks of using woke communism as a vehicle for power. While others have analyzed the bill in detail, the gist is that this bill, “The For The People Act”, is an unconstitutional nationalization of elections designed purely to deny the People fair and free elections. It is an assault on “democracy” but it is being portrayed differently and under the cover of woke communism.

The desire of the ruling class is to gain legitimacy for their otherwise inhumane agenda. In the past, they wrapped their inhumane agenda in the flag, witness Woodrow Wilson’s “patriotic” progressivism. Today they wrap it in the flags of the rainbow and the totalitarian fist of groups like Antifa and BLM (the corporate entity, not individuals who advocate for the black community and its legitimate grievances).

The For The People Act basically, and only, codifies election hijacking so that, through legalized legerdemain and trickery, coupled with mass manipulation through the corporate press, education, and entertainment, the ruling class can choose who gets into office. This isn’t a Party thing, this isn’t about getting Democrats in office, though even we have said such things and this may be the temporary plan. This is about ensuring that the people chosen by and subordinated to the ruling class have an unfair advantage.

This is legalized hijacking, making official all the extra-legal “policies” used in 2020 to control the election process and create desired outcomes (not fraud per se and not “illegal” but grossly manipulated and “gamed” to shift all the advantages to to the ruling class’s candidates.) It’s not “voting rights” but election hijacking that is being sought.

This doesn’t mean that perhaps a majority of voters aren’t leaning in the direction desired by the ruling class. The constant corporate press propaganda, educational programming, and entertainment brainwashing practically equal mass hypnosis. Are we surprised a majority of people when subjected to the most intense mass hypnosis program in human history actually fall for deception and freely vote away their own agency and dignity as human beings? We are not at all surprised.

But if it was all left to this mass hypnosis to get most people to vote the way the ruling class want, there wouldn’t be any need for this election hijacking law to pass. Indeed, none of the extra-legal policies (as in not passed by legislatures) by Secretaries of State and County election officials, which benefited only ruling class candidates and made it impossible to detect potential fraud, would have been needed if, in a clean and fair election, the majority would have reliable chosen the ruling class candidate.

People are convinced, without looking at the substance of the “We The People Act” or considering the people behind it, that without this their votes won’t matter and their voice won’t count. For them, being against this bill is racism.

The votes of people in the black community are being hijacked, but it’s not what people think. The black vote isn’t being used to empower local communities but keeps rubber-stamping the ruling class candidates and policies which do no good for the black community. We’ve said many times that simply voting Republican as an alternative won’t help the black community, the issue is that one Party has captured their vote and abuses the power it gives while thw other doesn’t welcome the black community in as equals and collaborators.

We propose new LOCALISM parties within the black communities that are blighted by the ruling class which don’t dance for Republicans or Democrats. We propose a change of rulers in these communities from the ruling class and the duopoly to the average person in each of these places, each of whom knows what’s best for themselves and their community.

The election hijacking law euphemistically called “The For The People Act”, is unlikely to pass and if it did it wouldn’t likely pass muster with the courts, but the principles and agenda behind it are being pursued, county by county and state by state, to ensure, as much as possible, we maintain the fiction of a free election without risking that the people might vote against the ruling class.

To push this the ruling class, through their corporate press and major monopoly corporations, are using woke communism, namely conjuring images of the Civil War and Jim Crow laws to make people feel this bill undermines “muh white supremacy” and empowers “the oppressed classes”, when, in reality, it does nothing of the kind.

If you oppose this bill you are a Jim Crow racist who should be canceled and you are perpetuating and fomenting the kind of insurrection that occurred on January 6th, according to the neocommunist wokatariate. Just note, this neocommunist wokatariate (woke communists or woke comms for short) are themselves but an adjunct and arm of the ruling class, though they don’t see themselves as such.

The BLM and Antifa rioters who are praised by the corporate press, egged-on by politicians, let off the hook by corrupt attorney generals, and who are given funds by various woke communist organizations and corporations have no idea they are actually fighting FOR “the man” against “the People!”

Marching with rainbow, BLM, and antifa flags backed by the hammer and sickle, the neocommunist wokatariate (neocomms) mindlessly, ignorantly, does the dirty work for the very ruling class that, if they knew better, they would want to fight against.

MLB Game In DC Called After Shooting: DC Police Union Blames City Officials

Bill Collier July 20, 2021

The San Diego Padres verus the DC Nationals game, in DC, was suspended and then called after a shooting led to three deaths just outside the stadium. Chaos ensued as people fled the scene.

The DC Police Union retweeted a video of the event with the commentary that “violent crimes permeates everything.”

The Union laid the blame on city officials who, they allege, have tied their hands. The same officials who lost their collective breath over the January 6th riot in the Capitol, using it to paint all Republicans as rebels guilty of insurrection, have allegedly done nothing to prevent the criminal anarchy that rears its head at random times and places in America’s capital city.

The incident was recorded by Jalen Drummond and shows people streaming away from the stadium in fear for their lives.

The news here is the police union’s frustration with city officials who they feel are hindering their work. The Washingtonian presents data claiming that the crime rate overall compared to last year is steady, although it doesn’t compare the crime rate of 2020 with 2019 or before.

Predictably, the “corporgov” (blurring of the line between corporate and government monopoly power) press are going back to the well of attacking the individual’s sacred (and shared) right to self-preservation and demanding an absolute monopoly on the use of force by the same police they also label racists and who they want to defend. The inner inconsistencies of their ideology are lost on them.

The corporgov press appear to be unable to grasp the connection between a cultural milieu dominated by immorality and corruption and without the voluntarily corrective influence of faith, family, and community and a culture that values life and promotes civic and moral virtues. They cannot see that the problem is moral or spiritual because for them moral and spiritual constraints, even when strictly voluntary and based on freewill participation, are at odds with their mostly hedonist and selfish lifestyles.

A society of disjointed, atomized individuals without the voluntarily corrective influence of faith, family, and community wherein the culture itself promotes hedonism and selfishness must be strongly managed because only force on the part of corporate and/or government monopoly power holders and the disarming of the population can prevent bad acts.

This murder of three people and the chaos unsuing which caused a Major League Baseball game to be called short may or may not be part of a deeper trend toward more lawlessness and may or may not be the result of local officials and their policies. Regardless, it is symptomatic of a deeper spiritual and moral crisis brought about by the deliberate assault on the anti-authoritarian institutions of faith, family, and community by woke communism.

Ultimately, the policies of these city officials that work actively against the institutions of faith, family, and community through freewill participation are to blame, not their unwillingness to give more power to cops or the fact we own a right to self-preservation and, therefore, to be armed.

The Great Reset Telegraphs Global Authoritarian Aims

Bill Collier July 20, 2021

Bill Collier- The World Economic Forum, an organization of ultra-globalist authoritarians, has made the claim, and then taken the video down, that “you will own nothing and like it.” In telegraphing its intentions for a world of peasants under the ruling class’s firm authoritariam control, the WEF itself proclaims that the idea of a coterie of ruling class shot-callers conspiring against the entire planet is not far-fetched.

Now comes their simulation exercises in which they actually test their intentions. Prior to the pandemic, they ran a simulation of a global pandemic. We can only guess how the WEF could have run a simulation that then played out in the real world, but one must consider their simulations as a telegraphing of their intent.

Their new “Cyber Polygon” exercise has all the marks of a massive global power grab meant to further reduce the economic freedoms of every human being on this earth. Here is a snippet from The Sociable:

Following up on last year’s cyber pandemic simulation, this year’s Cyber Polygon will hold live training exercises responding to “a targeted supply chain attack on a corporate ecosystem in real time.”

Running parallel to the training exercise will be discussions on how to tackle everything from ransomware and supply chain attacks to implementing “resilient” digital currencies, and a desire for global governance on the internet.

Massive disruptions that essentially collapse economies and soften people up may sound like a villain from a James Bond movie who has gone amuck, but the very goals of this exercise clearly, as it says in our Declaration of Independence, “evince a design of tyranny.” This global junta, or would-be junta, is making it clear they will use massive supply-chain disruptions to control you and keep you desperate and needy and all too ready to submit to a “global governance” aimed at the very heart of freedom.

Global governance of the internet is evidently critical, as well as top-down global control of supply-chains. A recent “study” by the IMF, which was a mathematical simulation based on assumptions, basically claims that a country depending on global supply chains is better off in a pandemic than one with a “nationalized” supply chain, i.e. a supply chain bssed mostly on internal production.

The aim of the great reset is to destroy faith, family, and community, to eliminate private property and individual agency, and to construct a totalitarian top-down system of control at the global level.

They are arguing against self-sufficency and self-reliance at the level of entire countries just as they (the ruling class) openly admit they desire a society without individual ownership. The Center For Risk Analysis did an extensive video on this, detailing the dangerous elements of this ideology.

This group of mostly financial sector shot-callers and political power brokers has decided to take upon itself the central management of the entirety of human civilization without any real input from the billions of people on the planet.

This is the essence of woke communism. It is a modern take on Marxism which relied on 100% state ownership of everything, including the means of production, but it uses a combination of state and corporate structures, all controlled from the top by a select few ruling class, in a centrally managed socioeconomic and sociocultural system.

Collectivist ownership is merely the ownership of everything and everyone by the very few. “You will own nothing and be happy” is totalitarian on two grounds: you have no ownership and therefore no freedom and “you will be happy” means you cannot dissent but will be forced, 1984 style, to like your bondage.

It is sometimes hard to discern whether the financial sector shot-callers are controlling the government shot-callers or the other way around. Is the new global governance structure being proposed a form of fascism where the government controls corporations and uses them as its agents (like having platforms banish people from the digital commons and marketplace at its behest)? Or is it really the mega corporate shot-callers using their influence and ownership of political rulers to essentially make the state an agent of the corporate interests in a sort of “corpostate” hybrid of collectivism and cronyism?

We use the term woke communism because, ultimately, the means of production and property are indeed centralized in terms of ownership and management while the woke cancel culture radicalism, complete with white shaming and alt gender rainbow authoritarianism, is the primary means of advancing that control and destroying the anti-authoritarian institutions of faith, family, and community.

Assaulting your own faith, family, and community and rendering you an undifferentiated and atomized cog in the top-down sociocultural and socioeconomic structure owned by the few but paid for by the many is the essence of what we call woke communism. It is all a form of corpo-statist politocracy: a state and corporate ownership and control of everything coupled with the poltization of all aspects of society wherein politics controls everything and very, very few people control politics.

While the masses as a whole carry more weight and could decimate the power of the ruling class, this requires scaled-up structures and organizations that can pool shared resources and both facilitate comity of action and determine the consensus of the whole so that action is agreeable to everyone participating.

We posit the concepts of spiritual nationhood to create larger-scale organic cohesiveness and alt sovereignties like virtual commonwealths and cryptonations as positive alternatives to the top-down corpo-statist structures and their controls. The ability to gather and organize people on a massive scale to exercise their agency in comity of action requires alt structures that both make larger-scale collaboration possible while positively upholding the spiritual sovereignty and agency of each individual.

The realization that We The People have the ultimate power, because we produce all wealth while the ruling class only control it and fleece the masses, is an internal awakening of agency and spiritual sovereignty that must precede effective action. Harnessing this power requires an at-scale comity of action that individuals and small groups cannot muster because the threat of this “great reset” as a massive scale effort.

That being said, there are many things individuals and small groups can do to find gaps for freedom and essentially hide themselves from the influence and control of the ruling class. We propose things like the multi-family freehold villa or estate, local food and energy freedom clubs, local safety and home security cooperatives, and individuals being well prepared for massive disruptions to society.

At-scale structures that promote comity of action as an offset to the global war on freedom and the whole woke communist ideology will emerge as and when individuals and small groups adopt freedom building methods and moral/ethical precepts on a freewill participatory basis.

The “great reset” is best described as a form of neocommunist dictatorship at the global level that combines corporate and governmental power controlled by the very few who then use woke cancel culture to demoralize the individual and eliminate such institutions as faith, family, and community. Ownership and agency fall before the ruling class, the anti-authoritarian institutions of faith, family, and community are gone, and all speech and economic interactions are controlled by this same ruling class.

Because this combines neocommunist destruction of private ownership with the woke cancel culture to undermine faith, family, and community we call it woke communism. But whatever name you want to call it, “the great reset” is a global power grab that uses cancel culture to destroy anti-authoritarian institutions while also destroying private ownership and instituting a global totalitarian “governance” that only serves the ruling class.

MEDICAL FREEDOM- Doctor Becomes Patient Rights Activist

Bill Collier July 18, 2021

Health coverage is expensive, but medical care isn’t? How is this and what can we do?

Dr. Marion Mass went through a metamorphosis from a physician to a patient rights advocate when she saw how money and politics, not patient needs, were adding multiple layers of complication and costs without benefiting patients. Her story and recent podcast transcends partisan labels and is a fresh way to approach medical care instead of playing politics with “health care” that may provide “coverage” but is too expensive and doesn’t serve patient needs.

Dr. Marion Mass joins other doctors in a PODCAST where this is all explored in depth.

The cartoon above is a simple story about the evolution of a doctor into a patient’s rights activist.

Dr. Mass serves as the vice-chairman of Practicing Physicians of America whose mission includes protecting the ability of all practicing physicians to serve as their patients’ primary health care advocate and to confront unnecessary and overbearing regulation that limits any physicians’ ability to serve their patients.

See more about this below:

How Health Care #Middlemen are:
Emptying America’s pockets,
Replacing physicians
What you can do.

Give 🇺🇸 transparency
Had so much fun on this podcast! ❤️

Kudos @notaproviderMD and @GallaherCaren
https://t.co/nHCEgaaAuI

Drs. Nikki Johnson, Caren Gallaher, and Marion Mass expose the truth about medication and device rebates and how this ties in to increasing healthcare costs and unsafe patient care. We give you actionable items to advocate for yourself and demand transparency.

Visit https://practicingphysician.org /, https://physiciansforpatientsofficial.org /, and https://www.patientrightsadvocate.org / to learn more.

Statement On The White House’s Misinformation Bogeyman

Bill Collier July 17, 2021

Publisher, Bill Collier- People who spread misinformation are a bane to our existence, especially when they do so knowingly and also when they don’t do the basic due diligence necessary to screen out ridiculous claims. The problem is that the definition of misinformation, like other bogeyman fears being used to perpetuate authoritarianism, gets all too broad and the response becomes both immediately draconian, canceling the malefactors from the digital commons, and unforgiving, never giving a path to redemption or rehabilitation.

Democrats have more concern for rehabilitating gangs and criminals than they do for people who they deem worthy of digital banishment within a society whose best opportunities and social activities exist mostly within and through the digital commons.

The digital commons is, like it or not, essential to equal opportunity and prosperity in our society and banishing people from this commons for anything less than absolutely criminal conduct, and banishing them for life, deprives them of equal access to all this society offers. It should be considered very seriously and with hesitation and no longer be treated as just removing someone from a private space and not a big deal. This old civilization with its latter-days authoritarianism (so typical of old civilizations) is literally creating the disaffected “internal proletariat” whose ideas and philosophy become the basis of a new civilizational paradigm.

The latest gambit by yet about President to resort to fear-mongering and broad generalizations in order to throttle discourse, wherein platforms are being nudged by government to do what it cannot do and ruin the lives of people whose speech the Democrats (in this case) don’t fancy, is likely to be nuked from orbit by the courts. Making a private entity an agent of a government policy that seeks to punish, albeit not through legal means, anyone they deem to be spreading misinformation is not going to survive many court proceedings.

What is more, the creators of a new web 3.0 digital commons are bound to look askance at any government telling them and their digital communities who to banish! Within 20 years, we predict, all those platforms that “cooperate” in digital banishment for too weak a cause will be left behind in the coming digital age. Digital communities with maximum participatory self-governance and fraternal connections as their basis will eventually, slowly but surely, replace platforms as the new digital commons.

The national pastime of labeling everything you and your Party disagree with “misinformation” is too well established for most fair-minded people to think anyone, including a privately owned platform, is standing on strong moral ground when they arbitrarily label content disinformation and use it to do real social and economic harm to people through banishment from the digital commons.

Even if we agree a private platform has great latitude in who it banishes, this doesn’t mean we think their trigger-happy approach to banishment using opaque standards that cannot be consistently applied with rigor is a good idea morally or for the long-term health of the platform. We certainly think it is a good idea to view any “collaboration” between massive, near-monopoly platforms where the digital commons mostly exists (and outside of which individuals will increasingly face a reduction in opportunities and social connections), with grave concern.

Not all cooperation is bad. But too much can blur the line between state and platform in such a way that an essentially private digital commons is de facto, even if not de jure, molded by a state controlled by a Party with strong authoritarian leanings.

It is true, actual misinformation can harm people. If you put it out there that everyone from one demographic are a hazard to justice or equity or anything, when that’s a gross exaggeration or generalization, that’s misinformation. It’s wrong. It should be called out and confronted and if a direct link between the propagation of that misinformation and real harm to other can be proven, then criminal persecution isn’t off the table. A tort has occurred.

People saying patently false and provably inaccurate things that cause harm to others, where a direct link can be proven, should face consequences, including civil lawsuits.

But we know Democrats today, and it could be Republicans tomorrow, tend to paint a rather broad stroke when they invoke the accusation of misinformation. This is the reason why one Jen Psaki, the Press Secretary, doubling down on the government “working with” (pressuring) platforms to banish people from the digital commons for anything the White House deems “misinformation” is such a hyperbolic non-starter.

The otherwise charming and adroit Press Secretary has clearly become divorced from that strong American tradition of tolerance: e.g. “I might not like or agree with what you say but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.”

The Press Secretary could have clearly stated that if people are illegally spreading falsehoods to gain profit (and clicks are profit) that are harming people that the government urges platforms to be proactive in flagging that. But we know that talk of the possibility a certain virus had its genesis in a lab in China became prima facae evidence of misinformation that was banishable! Now that theory is revived and is not misinformation. Sadly, those already banished for stating that theory remain banished.

The administration has a few hobby horses such as “muh white supremacy” and racism, the election, the January 6th “insurrection”, climate change, and the virus all of which include some degree of accusing anyone who disagrees of “misinformation.” It is therefore a bad faith claim to say that the spirit behind such nonsensical and untenable rhetoric about banishing people for misinformation is at all about public safety.

We would perhaps be more worried if this wasn’t just more rhetorical flash to appease the authoritarian base of the Democratic Party and if it wasn’t so laughably untenable both from a legal and public support perspective. We would not be surprised to find such “collaboration” is anything more than happy talk and that no real collaboration is happening.

The public aren’t ready to let Jen Psaki, or even Donald Trump, become the arbiter of what is or isn’t misinformation and the trend toward banishment from the digital commons is going to boomerang “bigly” on the technocrats and their Democratic Party pals. Web 3.0, the digital commons built around diverse digital communities within a decentralized but compatible ecosystem, is coming and it couldn’t come soon enough.

European Floods Become New Justification For Climate Change Authoritarianism

Bill Collier July 17, 2021

By Bill Collier- Flooding in Europe is the new excuse for climate change authoritarianism. As people hope to rebuild their lives, the EU and other governments in Europe are focused less on people’s needs and more on new ways to impoverish them and reduce their freedom.

Citing the “obvious” connection between massive rainfall and hotter climate, once again climate change authoritarianism is asserting itself before the dead and wounded can even be sorted out in a major disaster. The speed with which any event, be it rain or draught, hot or cold temperatures, is blamed on climate change, coupled with more calls for yet more authoritarian responses, far outpaces the speed of recovery from such events.

Journalists, ideologically drawn to authoritarianism as most are thanks to their poor educations in schools of journalism, unquestionably repeat every claim without seriously questioning why the climate change theory, unlike other scientific theories, presents anything that would disprove itself. In short, everything that happens unpleasant is counted to the same cause without question.

Meanwhile, over 1300 people are missing and over 125 dead in a torrential outburst that dumped some two months worth of rain in 24 hours over mostly northwest Germany and parts of Holland and Belgium. Flooding in other areas, ranging from Switzerland to areas in northern and eastern Germany was also reported. The floods in western Germany were particularly dangerous because they came suddenly with walls of water pouring through towns and villages, in some cases collapses houses or simply tearing through them.

German Minister of the Environment Svenja Schulze announced, “These are the harbingers of climate change that have now arrived in Germany.” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called the flooding “a clear indication of climate change” and “something that really, really shows the urgency to act.”

The EU is busy promoting rather draconian and authoritarian measures to allegedly mitigate climate change, such as literally banning all but electric cars within 20 years, a shocking move that would lead to economic devastation but also render the population less mobile and more controllable.

Serious proposals focused on house portable and house affordable energy, loosening zoning and codes rules to allow for more sustainable building technologies and for home-based hydroponics, gardens, and graywater recycling, for instance, are off the table. The entire focus is on more authoritarian and draconian measures that create a One Big System (OBS) approach wherein 100% of the cost and loss of freedom falls on working people without impacting the ruling class.

The propensity of “climate scientists” to regularly and shamelessly don the mien of totalitarian ideologues is most certainly one of the chief reasons many view their preachments with suspicion. For the German government to, at this very hour, leap to conclusions simply because it serves their increasingly authoritarian agenda, is a gross disservice to victims of this flooding.

The issue is less about whether we need to reduce polluting emissions that can harm the environment and lead to climate change and more about the fact every proposed solution impoverishes billions of souls and reduces their freedom while, at the same time, this theory brooks no dissent and offers no example where a prediction not happening or other unpredicted events happening would disprove it.

Climate change, like other hobgoblins, may have a basis of truth, but the problem lies in the oversimplification of its effects, in the exploitation of every disaster, in the authoritarian proposals for dealing with it, and with how it’s claims of proof know no bounds and are contradictory.

Impoverishment and totalitarianism won’t solve a changing climate, especially if the changes aren’t totally man-made. These measures will lead to societal instability and ruin without appreciably effecting outcomes but all to further increase the power and wealth of the ruling class.

Real solutions to mankind’s baneful impact on the planet are available and would increase individual wealth and freedom, because they would shift resources from OBS to the homes and communities controlled by average workaday people.

OUR THOUGHTS-

Most of those who claim to care about climate change offer only rather authoritarian responses which impoverish people, make them less free, and don’t make a dent on the climate itself. The truth is, they don’t care about the bogeyman they are using to scare you into submission, their objective is the radical global transformation of society into an authoritarian regimen ruled by the few at the grave expense of the many.

If you’re really serious about climate change, abandon OBS model and embrace a “house portable and house affordable” solution that seriously reduces negative impacts through human activities but also makes average people wealthier, more free, and healthier.

Free people from the many backwards and technology-suppressing rules, regulations, and “codes” that keep them from creating local food, energy, and housing independence through locally renewable resources. Invest in technology to advance food and energy independence at the level of the home primarily and the local neighborhood or town. Provide tax and regulatory waiver incentives to those seeking food and energy independence and sustainable home design.

The left authoritarians don’t propose these things, they propose draconian measures like banning all combustion engines and leaving people high and dry without affordable transportation or taxes and regulations that drive energy costs into the stratosphere. Their “solutions” are inhumane power grabs and massive wealth redistribution schemes that rob from the working class and feed the ruling class.

It’s hard to take climate change seriously when so many of those who bang the drum of alarm offer very non-serious proposals that truly read almost exclusively like a recipe for an authoritarian hellscape than an earth-friendly and humane approach to reducing humanity’s impact on the environment.

As for the Freedomist, we do not think all climate change is man-made or bad, but we do think the impact of human activity on the planet needs a serious rewrite. This begins with a strong emphasis on house-portable and house-affordable solutions, as opposed to OBS, that will make people more wealthy and free and devolve power from the top and center to individuals, families, and communities.

Enabling people to build affordable, sustainable housing and obtain food and energy independence at the very local level would dramatically reduce the environmental cost of human activity without threatening human flourishing.

The OBS approach won’t fix any problems, it will lead to instability, it decreases freedom and increases poverty, and, in the end, delays a truly effective response to a growing negative environmental and climate impact from human activity. None of the EU’s proposals do anything more than create a society of poor, working class cogs in the wheels of a neofeudal machine run by and for the ruling class at everyone’s expense but their own.

This Is Not How To Gain Acceptance of Vaccines

Bill Collier July 16, 2021

For the sake of argument, let’s stipulate that the vaccine against this pandemic is perfectly fine. We may ignore the fact Israel is now issuing a third vaccine as the old one isn’t stopping the new varient. We can also ignore the whole fear of new varients that may render the first vaccine, which many reported gave miserable symptoms after injection of the second dose, useless. Also ignore the lack of longevity research possible for any new vaccine.

The authoritarian and arrogant way the Biden administration is handling this, almost as if it is a wedge issue designed to make Republicans look bad, has backfired. Far from being browbeat into submission, Americans are responding with suspicion and resistance.

The basic idea is, “if this is so good, why do you have to try to shame and bully me to do it?” What is more, while the vaccine is practically being forced on everyone, the accountability for negative side effects or long-term problems is gone. Nobody, from manufacturers to the government, accepts any responsibility if taking this proves, in the long-term, causes harm. And nobody can guarantee there won’t be any long-term negative effects.

The issue isn’t that the vaccine is available, the issue is threefold: people don’t like being bullied, people aren’t sure if this is useful against new varients or of its long-term effects, and nobody is on the hook if it doesn’t work or has ill effects.

The issues with the vaccine tend to be common with any new vaccine. And the need for vaccines means that new vaccines must be rolled out sooner rather than later. But it also means that every new vaccine has unresolved questions as to its efficacy or possible ill effects. The difference is in the fact nobody is willing to take responsibility if this doesn’t work or causes harm and yet you are being bullied and shamed and your concerns are being ridiculed in a partisan and over-the-top manner.

By showing such disrespect and condescension and using rabid partisan attack language against people who have concerns, while shifting 100% of the risk on the person being bullied into getting the shot, you make it harder, rather than easier, to say yes.

This seems to be the only default now for Democrats: bully, shame, and defame while belittling and ignoring legitimate debate and questions and suppressing discourse and scientific exploration outside their agenda of preconceptions. If the vaccine is going to help, which also requires accountability for manufacturers and government if they get this wrong, then the present hubris shown by proponents needs to end now.

Take away all the rabid language and bullying and add accountability if this doesn’t work, and our rate of vaccination would be much higher.

The old line “the beatings will stop when morale improves” is funny, but not when it’s the entire establishment beating down on anyone who has a concern, anyone who has questions, anyone who wants someone to take responsibility for this if it fails, and exploration of ongoing science as to alternatives.

Why Won’t Republicans Name and Confront Woke Communism?

Bill Collier July 16, 2021

Whether the term is woke communism or progressive authoritarianism, Republican leaders and top officials have consistently watered-down their talking points while every day Democrats lambast Republicans as Nazis, racists, phobes, and the like without even attempting any sense of honesty or civility.

Let’s stick with woke communists as our term. It’s a modern term, not coined by us per se, that describes what we also refer to as “neocomms”, new communists who have evolved into a Party-controlled duopoly of woke corporations with near monopoly power and the state. Unlike the Stalin model, these woke communists, woke because their use of racist and gender-bending “wokeness” as their cudgel, don’t want to destroy the corporations, they choose to harness them. And unlike the Chinese communists who use the state to control the corporations, the Democrats seem to prefer to have their totalitarian party control both the corporations and the state separately, at least for now.

The Republicans are having none of this. They know that if they lay this legitimate charge on their opponents, the DNC Press will viciously attack them with smears and slanders meant to destroy, or cancel, them from life. It’s an internal banishment that leaves you a broke pariah.

But without the courage to stand up now, when some legal protections for speech remain, these same Republicans are courting disaster as the march away from a Bill of Rights society toward authoritarianism continues. Their fecklessness and collaboration in the face of blatant authoritarianism and gross violence against the Bill of Rights by this totalitarian party becomes more and more inexcusable.

When will Republicans name and confront woke communism and expose the fact the Democratic Party has become wholly captured by this modern manifestation of totalitarianism?

The reaons run from fear to just wanting the trappings of office without the responsibility or the risk, to perhaps even having sympathy at least for the corporate side of the woke communist duopoly. The woke communist war on freedom is well documented and their rhetoric against all things decent and noble is also well known.

The ability of Republicans to stand up to, name, and confront woke communism for what it is and who it is should become a litmus test in every primary. If you won’t confront the woke communists, then you shouldn’t be in office.

New Alliance Tackles Pandemic In Face of Political Headwinds

Bill Collier July 16, 2021

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of highly published, world-renowned critical care physicians and scholars are striving to find ways to effectively mitigate the effects of Covid-19 through early treatments. Their website is here- FLCC

The FLCCC Alliance – with the academic support of allied physicians from around the world – works to research and develop lifesaving protocols for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 in all stages of illness. Their MATH+ Hospital Treatment Protocol, introduced in March 2020, has saved thousands of patients who were critically ill with COVID-19. Now, the FLCCC’s new I-Mask+ Prophylaxis and Early At-Home Outpatient Treatment Protocol with Ivermectin has been released – and is a potential solution to the global pandemic.

Political headwinds are the only real hindrance to further advancing the treatment options for patients and their efforts are meant to publicize research and findings while documentation successful treatments.

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance was initially formed as a working group under “emergency” conditions of the early COVID-19 pandemic in response to multiple early reports of COVID patients with an inexplicably high need for prolonged mechanical ventilation and an excessive mortality associated with the prevailing “supportive care only” recommendations disseminated by the majority of national and international health care organizations.

Tioga County PA Commissioners Defy Voters, State Senate Over Audit

Bill Collier July 14, 2021

Bill Collier- Tiny, in population, Tioga County PA, where, coincidentally, The Freedomist is based, is at the center of efforts to audit Pennsylvania’s 2020 election results, which, it is alleged, are suspect. Every court so far has denied this, but it is still alleged an audit is needed.

The amazing thing about Roger Bunn, Mark Hamilton, and Erick Coolidge is that their county, the county where the Publisher of the Freedomist (myself) lives, 74.7% voted for Trump and one can gather well over 50% of all voters likely want an audit.

These three Commissioners are an interesting phenomenon where even the most conservative areas surrender their line offices to people who lack the vigor and passion of their own voters. What is more fascinating is that these usually cardboard cutouts for local officials who make no waves usually also lean in the opposite direction of their voters. But, because local politics are usually more about potholes than principles, they never show their true nature or beliefs.

So, while a County of over 40,000 may by as much as 74.7% demand an audit, the Republicans they elected to lead them, for so long and without any real challenge, have proven to not really be Republicans at all.

Having myself watched these men since the first time I came to the County in 2009, I am not even slightly surprised that these three all agreed to disagree with almost every single person who ever voted for them in order to avoid rocking the boat. They’re not bad guys, really, they just got elected by sleepy voters who didn’t vett the people who would lead their County, assuming that of they were Republicans that was good enough.

Again, let’s be clear, whatever one feels about their decision, they have their reasons no doubt, the issue is that we all keep letting people into office who don’t, when push comes to shove, reflect our beliefs and values and nor are they informed by them.