Yesterday, June 28th, 2021, a Chinese national was wounded after an attack was executed in Karachi, Pakistan. The assailant used a gun despite Pakistan’s strict antigun laws to target Chinese citizens for death as China is beginning to extend its presence into foreign lands that don’t appreciate Chinese imperialism any more than they appreciated American imperialism.
This news is not as significant as how China is responding to the action, choosing to brand this as an “isolated incident,” despite the recent bus bombing in the region of Kohistan, Pakistan. 9 Chinese nationals, all engineers, were killed in that attack.
This move, to this writer, seems to be more about the dome4stic audience at home than the audience abroad, especially the Pakistani one, as the CCP will have to use its media corporations (in the same way the DNC does here in America) to convince the Chinese whatever they need to convince them to push the narratives forward that keep them in power and extend it.
As more Chinese die in foreign lands as a result of Chinese imperialism, this effort will become increasingly difficult even for the CCP to manage.
It was the Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian who labeled the assault an “isolated” incident not indicative of any collective sentiment by the Pakistani people themselves.
Despite having a corpostate media constantly covering up for the President in name Only (That would be PINO JOE, to the initiated), the machine known as President Biden is finding itself under water in the approval polling, according to Rasmussen.
The poll shows Biden has a 46 percent approval rating to a 52 percent disapproval rating. This is news the media will have to cover, but most likely will cover below the fold and at non-prime hours.
We at The Freedomist don’t base our opinions or politics on polls, as we are republicans at heart (as in form of government, not party loyalty), and the majority has no right to tyranize the majority in a republican form of government, but it is significant to note that Humpty Dumpty is having a great fall, even as all the King’s Horses and all the King’s men prop up this living corpse to avoid any perception of fall in the first place.
The potential threat to the state (and by extension the corpostate that serves it and is protected by it) control over the means of value exchange, currency, that cryptoocurrency offers might be seen in the recent fear tactics being deployed by an American Senator, DNC-CCP Senator Sherrod Brown, who recently declared that cryptocurrencies are an existential threat to Americans’ economic security.
Speaking on the state of crytpocurrencies, Brown said the currencies weren’t real dollars, which is true, they’re not fiat-based (or debt-based, really, but we’ll leave that discussion for another time), and that these currencies put our real dollars at risk (as if the Bidenflation, that’s Biden’s inflation to the uninitiated, doesn’t do that and more).
He called the exchanges “a shady, diffuse network of online funny money.” He informed Americans, who he seems to view as being incapable of making decisions on their own despite being part of an alleged republican model of government that assumes such powers among the rank and file from the state, that “if we want a solution to Americans’ legitimate fears about our banking system, shady start-ups are not the answer.”
As an addendum, I should add that the RNC record on cryptocurrencies is not much better (if it is at all) than the DNC, and this point also adds to the assumption made by many (including this writer’s) that the RNC is token opposition to the DNC. So long as we Americans rely on these two parties for relief from state and corporate tyranny, we will lose, again, and again, and again, to the few elites who control the means of social and cultural production.
Yesterday, Twitter made moves to seek to quell the resistance to the mass mailer election of 2020 when it moved to end the twitter presences of numerous accounts that had been sharing information about ongoing election audits around the country.
The move was made under the police-state-standard-favorite guise of preventing dangerous misinformation from being shared with the sheep-like, child-like public, a public that must be told what to think and how to think by the corporate executives all busy living hedonistic lifestyles of excess and entitlement from atop their mighty gated fortresses of power.
From Talking Points Memo:
Among the casualties: The official @ArizonaAudit account, as well as the sharper @AuditWarRoom account, which provided a constant stream of attacks aimed at critics of the sham recount. The anonymous creator of the latter account was also behind several other now-suspended accounts: @AuditMichigan, @AuditWisconsin, @AuditNevada, @AuditGeorgia, @Audit_PA, @Audit_Arizona.
This move is yet more fruit of a nation-state controlled, legislated, and moralized by the corpostate that represents in almost complete unity the will of the party, the DNC, which seems to be more and more pulling its inspiration from the Chinese Communist Party, which expects its corporations to enforce and propagate its party values to the ‘customers’ it serves.
The age of customer and provider is over in America, as corporations now view true Americans, those that hold to the legal and spiritial principles of the Bill of Rights, as subhumans to be weeded out of their police-state-friendly gardens.
America held a mass mailer election, there is no need for an audit for there was no election, as mass mailer elections are unaccountable by their very nature, and no audit will change that fact, no matter the results it might allege to discover. How can you figure out the results of an election that has no accountability and measurability in it in the first place?
This writer cares little about the audits themselves, for the reason mentioned above, but I care greatly for the continued assumption of fact supremacism, of moral supremacism, that corpo-state billionaires and their cowardly hangers on wish to force on Americans, coercively, through the power of their monopolistic hold on the marketplace of commerce and ideas, and so should you.
A people cannot be free that are not self-sustaining. Where self-sustainability is dead, tyranny lives, and this, my friends, is where we live in current year.
Biden’s DNC-infused and serving Department of Injustice is telegraphing to the world its alignment with the Chinese Communist Party by moving quickly to suppress the just efforts to bring to account the Chinese military researchers who violated American law and engaged in spying and espionage efforts to enrich the Chinese military, sworn enemy of the American way of life.
The Department of Injustice announced it will be dropping 6 cases against the Chinese spies that were headed to a California Federal Court, the Eastern District Court of California. In a statement given to the Washington Examiner, a DOJ (aka DNC) spokesperson, Wyn Hornbuckle, said,
“In all of our prosecutions, the Department of Justice evaluates the merits of a case as it prepares for trial. Recent developments in a handful of cases involving defendants with alleged, undisclosed ties to the People’s Liberation Army of the People’s Republic of China have prompted the department to reevaluate these prosecutions, and we have determined that it is now in the interest of justice to dismiss them.”
As the Washington Examiner highlighted, one such case involved a researcher named Tang Juan, who failed to disclose her military service in the People’s Liberation Army, an institution of anti-Americanism that is seeking to destroy our liberties from without and within. Even in 2020, before the Presidential Election, the DOJ apparently had DNC operatives that were pushing back against the Americans still occupying that institution, operatives who were claiming that her lack of mentioning her military service didn’t appear to be an example of intentional obstruction, but merely omission.
Tang’s defense lawyers told the court in a trial brief earlier this month that “there is dissension in the FBI’s own ranks” about the case against Tang. The lawyers pointed to an April 2021 draft analysis written by two FBI analysts titled “Defining the Extent of Obfuscation of Visiting Chinese Scholars’ Ties to the PLA.” The analysts suggested that the visa application’s military service declaration is potentially ambiguous, making it difficult to determine “whether obfuscation is intentional or for nefarious tech transfer purposes.”
The move by the DOiJ further underscores, in this writer’s opinion, the importance of the CCP to the DNC’s source of power in America and further erodes Americans’ confidence in a Justice Department limited by the Bill of Rights and working in the interests of a free American people.
The families of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting that happened in 2013, leaving 26 dead, including 20 children, have sued the manufacturer of the rifle of that the shooter used to carry out the act.
That manufacturer was Remington, a once-legendary gun manufacturer that fell out of disfavor after gun owners came to conclude the quality of the product had gone done. The manufacturer is now bankrupt, but in an effort, it seems, to discharge its liabilities it is offering the families a collective settlement of $33 million.
There are nine families involved in this suit, meaning each family would get $3.7 million. The manufacturer filed its offer at the Waterbury Superior Court in Connecticut this past Tuesday, July 27th, 2021.
The move, if accepted, could have two potentially radically different outcomes, one which establishes gun manufacturing liability for improper use of firearms that brings harm to others, or one that takes the precedent potential off the table altogether by avoiding any precedent-setting outcome by the courts.
For the families, who have been propped up in large part by anti-gun activist groups, the temptation to settle might be significant, even if the people who brought them to the dance would be disappointed, as they are most assuredly seeking to set definitiive precedent in American legal jurisprudence that could effectively end gun manufacturing in America.
The battle for the war against guns is raging, most likely, between the material interests of these families and the police-state interests of the party Apparatchiks behind this lawsuit (at least as I see it).
The question is this, even if the families take the cash, will the settlement effectively end the threat to gun manufactuers in America or will it create a de facto chilling born from the lack of spinal conviction of corporate American leadership?
Given the trend in corporate America to constantly bend the knee to the most extreme DNC-infused anti-American, anti-human moral codes known to humanity today, this writer is more than concerned that a settlement in this case, just being offered, is already laying the groundwork not just for some gun manufactuers that are part of larger corporate conglomerates to shut down shop, at least to American retail consumers, but also to companies on whom these manufacturers rely on to produce and deliver that product, especialy in the financial sector, an industry that has already demonstrated its willingness to assault the Bill of Rights ‘legally’ through its monopolistic enforcement of DNC-values over American ones.
I am hoping the families are pressured to not settle and that they ultimately lose a lawsuit that should have never been allowed in the first place, though my faith such an outcome will happen in this anti-American climate is not great. Accepting a settlement will make the effort to destroy the 2nd Amendment through fascist corporatism will be a fait accompli, so we have nothing to lose, really in hoping they don’t settle, despite the lack of faith we might have that the courts will reflect American, as oppossed to DNC values.
Storm clouds gather as people ask themselves openly whether whoever won the White House truly won. In 2016 Democrats blamed “Russia collusion” and asserted that Trump was never legitimate while in 2020 the Republicans returned the favor blaming a “rigged” vote-counting conspiracy theory. But the problem may not be “legal”, as in a crime or fraud, it may be something perfectly legal but absolutely unethical.
By Bill Collier, Publisher- Legally gamed elections are the result of dirty pool, merely legerdemain and blatant and dishonest media collusion with their favored Party, the Democrats in most cases, the Republicans in fewer cases. This turns our much vaunted “democracy” into a sham because no true “informed consent” is possible under these shady circumstances.
The 2020 election wasn’t stolen by fraud, it was unethically hijacked through media manipulation and extra-legal legerdemain, e.g. unelected bureaucrats enacting policies that ran afoul of state law and ignored the legislatures. We realize some feel strongly that real fraud occured, and if or when we see extraordinary proof to back these extraordinary claims, we will change our tune.
That being said, the 2020 election, and MANY OTHERS, some favoring Republicans, were not truly fair and free of dirty tricks which, while “legal”, are certainly not ethical. Gamesmanship as opposed to honestly conveying your true intentions, philosophy, and character colors our elections and makes a mockery of any concept that winners of our elections truly have a mandate earned through informed consent.
This does not mean Biden didn’t legally win, it means, in part, he had “legally rigged” the process to give him an unfair advantage by the way the rules were changed and by the corruption of a “free press” that is merely a lapdog to the Democratic Party. It’s not fraud but it is dirty pool. It is perfectly legal to game the system and play dirty pool and to not ever really and honestly earn the informed consent of voters who basically have no idea what you true intentions, philosophy, and character are!
Dirty pool is integrated fully into our politics and while both Democrats and Republicans play dirty pool habitually, Democrats are just better at it right now, although not always and in many ways 2020 was a bad year for them. Currently, the Democrats, despite all the dirty tricks and legerdemain they could muster, only have a slim majority in the House and a tie in the Senate broken by the Vice President’s tie-breaking vote.
Elections as we see them all over the world are not capable of being a free and fair competition in which informed electors choose candidates based on an accurate knowledge of their true intentions, philosophy, and character. This is true in Israel, Germany, Russia, and the good old US of A, but, obviously, even more true in Russia, for example.
Is it possible to have free and fair elections where true informed consent based on honestly knowing the intentions, philosophy, and character of candidates can be obtained? We have strong doubts and the trend away from this possibility just isn’t getting any better, nor do we foresee any changes.
Alternative models cannot be created at scale in our present sociocultural and political structures because they are stratified and stagnant. Trying to change things like the behavior of unethical “reporters” who literally lie and misrepresent things for purely partisan purposes, robbing people of their right to informed consent, is beyond this civilization’s capacity. Moreover, how would you “regulate” the press to make them behave without destroying the very concept of a free press?
The “solution”, unfortunately, if you want to stop bad actors like the miscreants who populate both Parties from getting into office, is to understand and master election gamesmanship and legerdemain and to find new ways to reach voters and get through the media propaganda assault on their very psyche. Even if your intentions, philosophy, and character are truly good, so that truly informed people would choose you if they knew the truth, the path to victory isn’t to simply hope your “truth” will speak for itself.
The “truth” is not enough under the current electoral system, which is geared toward rewarding legerdemain, media corruption, and dirty tricks more than a straightforward and accurate comparison of the intentions, philosophy, and character of the candidates. You can be labeled horrendous things even if this isn’t who you are or you can be labeled awesome things even if you are far from awesome.
While fighting the electoral battle, using all the means to hand, should never be off the table, building freedom must depend on strategies that go beyond this reliance on election outcomes. If you are frustrated at election outcomes, the answer is both to get better at playing the actual electoral game but, even moreso, building relationships, associations, and structures that unilaterally liberate as much of your economic and physical life from the control of politics as possible.
Considering the course set by the Democrats, it is clear that reason has failed. The Democratic Party has hearkened to the darkest voices of intolerance and bigotry against anyone and anything that isn’t woke enough for their rather outlandish and bizarre tastes.
We must remember that our Union of sovereign and free people in their sovereign and free states and counties has many mechanisms with which to prevent too much power from concentrating into too few hands. We also as individuals and as free associations have many ways to take back our agency from corporations owned by people whose first and only loyalty it seems is to the Democratic Party.
Reason has failed but the answer is not physical violence. This isn’t necessary and all the outlandish rhetoric of the left which seems to reveal a heart seduced by the siren call to a one-party rule is more an issue of their character than a true threat to our country.
It is definitely unforgivable rhetoric when you lie and demonize your opponents while proposing ever-increasing authoritarian responses to your phantom right-wing conspiracy to overthrow the government. But the power to actually fulfill this rhetoric lies beyond their reach, especially if we the People, the remnant who still remain loyal to the Union as an empire of freedom, use the means we have at hand to block the authoritarian agenda.
On one hand the Democrats are sounding like crazed Soviets and performing “show trials” in which all of their opponents are in trial for treason against the state. On the other hand, the emperor has no clothes. When push comes to shove the American people and all their local and state governments won’t tolerate this garbage. So it’s a lot of noise and chest-beating headed into some fanstistical nightmare, pure bliss evidently for the lunatic fringe who control the Democrats. But it’s not substantive and it’s not going to succeed.
One wonders if Nancy Pelosi is actually that delusional in her dotage or she is just playing theater to appease her base while doing nothing of substance they desire. Either way she is a crumb for even entertaining these cretins, and cretins they all are because their hearts beat hatred daily against freedom and against the Union.
This cold civil war, which is not going to become hot because the rebels on the left are pusillanimous, once against pits slavers again the free. Once again Democrats evince a design of slavery, albeit more disguised as global cronyist feudalism that touts socialist rhetoric, and this time the aim is for everyone of every color to work the plantation.
Old habits die hard and the Democrats have never, not since 1860, warmed up to the notion of America as a Union of sovereign and free people in sovereign and free counties and states where power flows from the bottom to the top, wherein the top is subordinated to the bottom, not the other way around.
Democrats have gone past reason and common sense. They are now trapped by their own vile rhetoric into a cycle of continuous denouncements and accusations while disguising and covering up their own outlandish conduct.
The best response is to reinvigorate the institutions designed to prevent our Union from being taken over from within by quislings who despise our freedom. First is our own self-reliance, building mutual self-reliance at the local level and using new web tools to connect and collaborate on a nationwide scale. Second is reinvigorating our local, county, and state governments to openly defend the Bill of Rights and refuse to countenance breaches thereof, including taking legal measures or simply not doing business with companies that coordinate to effectively limit the freedom of Americans.
The entire and untapped power of our Union is able to prevent these loony words from becoming anything more than the swan song for a party that has lost touch with reason and reality.
The Ute Tribe, in the press release below, slams a woke leftist writer for daring to speak “outrage” in the Tribe’s name over the fact the University of Utah sports teams are called “The Running Utes.”
Virtue signaling that disrespects the tribe and could do real economic harm has no place in decent society where human dignity is mutually honored by all. But the wokatariate aren’t interested in justice, they are more about making themselves look good and enjoying the perverse power of canceling others and imposing their own unopopular anr dangerous ideas.
————
Luke Duncan chairman of the Ute Indian Tribe Business Committee, the governing body of the Ute Indian Tribe, has issued a press release scolding a woke activist and University of Utah emoloyee who “demands” the school stop using the Ute name.
The Ute tribe is made up of three bands: the Uintah, the Whiteriver and the Uncompahgre; two representatives from each band are elected to serve four-year terms on the Business Committee.
The tribe’s Uintah and Ouray Reservation is located in northeastern Utah, approximately 150 miles east of Salt Lake City. It’s the second-largest Indian reservation in the United States, covering more than 4.5 million acres.
Last month, The Salt Lake Tribune ran a commentary titled, “Time for the U. to Give up its Native American Nickname.” The author, a University of Utah employee named Christopher Mead, argued that the University of Utah needs to stop using the name “Running Utes.”
Our business committee, the elected governing body of the Ute Indian Tribe, was incensed and deeply troubled when we read the piece. Mead’s approach in raising this issue on behalf of our tribe, and the implicit attitude of saving the Ute people from themselves, lacks common sense. It undermines tribal rights, it causes conflict between native and non-native communities, and it negates our ability as a sovereign nation to make appropriate decisions for our people.
The Ute Indian Tribe is a major economic engine in northeastern Utah. We work closely with the state, local governments, and major institutions to address long-standing issues that range from preservation of cultural and environment resources to responsible energy development. These relationships are valuable to us, and an op-ed like Mead’s has a devastating impact on them, and on the trust we have built over many years.
Let us be clear. Only the Ute Indian Tribe can speak for itself. And regarding the matter at hand, the Ute Indian Tribe encourages the University of Utah to use our name for its sports programs.
Our tribe drafted the Athletics Naming Agreement, and the university has used the Ute name with our full support since 1972. In fact, we just renewed our memorandum of understanding in December for another five years, and we retain trademark rights to the Ute Proud name and imagery.
The relationship between the Ute Indian Tribe and the University of Utah is a long and valued one, and it’s a source of pride to our tribal members. Not only does it reflect our shared commitment to building genuine respect for and understanding of our tribe’s history, it also has significant educational benefits for our youth.
In a key part of the agreement, the university provides a Ute Proud education campaign (http://uteproud.utah.edu/) during the football, basketball, and gymnastics seasons. This campaign explains Ute Indian history and the Ute Indian Tribe’s cultural and economic contributions to the state.
The campaign also provides a code of conduct that educates sports fans about inappropriate behaviors that dishonor the Ute and other Native American populations. The Ute Indian Tribe assigns a tribal representative to work with the university to develop and approve all campaign elements.
Our tribe is well aware that this association with the University of Utah‚ the flagship institution of higher learning in our state — raises tribal visibility and community awareness. Once a year, the university’s halftime show incorporates a traditional powwow with appropriate and approved cultural tie-ins, providing a valuable opportunity to educate and promote understanding.
In addition, the university supports campus events to raise awareness of American Indian cultures, from the annual campus powwow to Native American Month. It has added educational materials about the Ute Indian Tribe to first-year student orientation, and it’s making those materials available through its American Indian Resource Center as well.
This is important to us, after enduring the devastating termination and assimilation policies of the last century. We will not be invisible, or erased.
Ute Mountain Ute Tribe wins Energy grant for solar project in Utah What’s more, the University of Utah actively supports Ute Indian students and other federally recognized American Indian students who are attending the university, and it provides annual financial support to the Ute Indian Tribe to enhance K-12 education on the Uintah and Ouray Reservation.
The University of Utah recognizes that the Ute name is at the core of our tribe’s cultural identity and that of our members, and it constitutes an inseparable element of our rich cultural traditions. The university also has consistently expressed its honor in being allowed to use the Ute name with due respect and integrity.
We are a sovereign nation with an absolute right to self-determination. The Athletics Naming Agreement was ours to make, and it’s grounded in mutual respect. We will not accept efforts of non-natives, who do not know the history or understand the work we have done, calling for its demise.
By Bill Collier- We don’t trust any major “platform” or even any US or international institution, to tell the truth, to play fair, or to look out for the good of the people and we have very good reasons to exercise a healthy and robust level of skepticism.
The fact people trust our national and international establishment and its ruling class and that they are outraged others are skeptical is amazing! The “disinformation” and other labels designed to force-feed parroted lines and cancel the skeptical should be all the proof you need not to trust any of these people or institutions.
Misinformation is the new rallying cry for modern authoritarians, especially the monopolistic platform owners, who want to silence and disappear all dissent from the Democratic Party line. Those who doubt and dissent from the preachments of the intelligence community, the science community, health care institutions, the press, the platforms, academia, and the entertainment industry as well as near-monopoly corporations are accused of “misinformation” and “canceled.”
Put another way, the owners of the major platforms and the press are almost entirely partisan Democrats for whom the advancement of the Democratic Party is their greatest goal.
Honestly, WHY should you trust a government or any leading national or international institution after the last few decades of gross, dangerous, and outlandish lies going back to “weapons of mass destruction” and the so-called “Russia collusion” scandal? Why trust that anything these institutions say is reliable or even aboveboard?
The corruption of these institutions, whereby holders of power abuse their position and cover up their failures, is all-too well known. We cannot reasonably trust anything these institutions and their ruling class say or do as anything that is truly meant to enrich themselves and not the country or its people.
The truth is, the platforms especially, and all major institutions controlled by the Democratic Party, want to desperately avoid accountability and allow a group of less than 20 major power brokers determine who can speak and what they can say. In such an environment, when all the DNC-controlled institutions parrot the same lines, the thoughtful person has strong reasons to view such preachments with extreme caution. Quite simply, we know they lie, we know they suppress dissent, and we know they have demonstrated criminal incompetence that has caused hundreds of thousands of deaths.
Those who parrot all the typical lines coming from America’s neocommunist wokatariate, the wokecomms, and their Party, the Democratic Party, often pretend they are thinking for themselves and are somehow on the “cutting edge” or even “on the right side of history.” Everything from the alt gender rainbow intolerance for traditional views on marriage and family to the mass inoculations of the entire population over the pandemic, is colored by the desire of the ruling class to gain monopoly power once and for all.
It is not “radical” to say “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll fight to the death form your ability to say it.” Now the Democratic Party and the institutions it controls, such as the US Capital Police and the CDC, want to tell us what kind of speech is permissible. They use hobgoblins and imaginary threats like white supremacy, hate speech, and misinformation but the only Party benefited by these arbitrary claims which they cannot support with logic or evidence are the billionaire owners of the Democratic Party.
If you consider yourself woke and then consider that all your major ideas and the things that animate you are quite literally being force-fed to the population while everyone who disagrees faces being canceled, don’t imagine you are on any cutting edge or that you are on the right side of history.
The ideas you parrot and think are so edgy are ideas that demand and require authoritarian measures to enforce them. For any decent, thinking person, this is itself proof that those ideas, including the whole alt gendered rainbow panapoly of identities and enforced compliance, and all the other mantras of the establishment, are garbage.
Skepticism about the preachments of the leading national and international institutions is reasonable and could be life-saving.
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
