The US inJustice Department has come out swinging against any opposition to the mass mailer election of 2020, aiming to quell efforts in other states to take a look under the mass mailer election hood of 2020.
The inJustice department were alarmed about the “unusual second round of examinations” attached to the 2020 mass mailer election. Remember folks, the key phrase we are repeating here is mass mailer election.
As we’ve said in other reports, the audits may or may not find anything, but they are irrelevant to the more pressing fact that we conducted a national election using a mass mailer to do it.
Here is an interesting chart from MIT that will show you what we mean:
From a previous high of 20% in terms of mail-in ballots in 2016, this election saw close to 50% all votes being conducted by mass mailer, more than doubling the previous high percentage. For the Justice Department, the inJustice Department, correalating an increase in post-election concern to this massive spike in vote-by-mail is either too difficult or too inconvenient in how it affects the political fortunes of the CCP-knock-off party, the DNC.
An inJustice Department mouthpiece ‘clarified’ to reporters the intent of the warning with this statement, “I think the reason we’re issuing this as guidance is to tell jurisdictions generally that we are concerned that if they’re going to conduct these audits … they have to comply with federal law. This document sets down a marker.”
This official issued this statement behind closed doors anonymously. No one from within the department has leaked the identity of the press whisperer.
The warning seems to be about sending a message to the states that the Feds will mess with their stuff through attempts to arrest or sue officials that might take part in one of these audits of a mass mailer election.
(note: to the usual crowd of DNCers in all your forms who might be righteously screaming right now, “It was a pandemic!”, that fact is irrelevant to the more pressing fact that we conducted a mass mailer election, no matter the reason, a method of voting that has no accountability and should be afforded no trust).
Let’s see what happens in “Red Country” in response to this not-at-all-veiled threat on states’ sovereignty.
