June 2, 2026

Front

We Are BLASTING Race Identitarianism As A Threat To Freedom

It’s time to bring in the big guns and blast away remorselessly at the edifice of a race identitarianism which could become, if continually provoked by the blatant race hate coming from the woke savage camp, THE major threat to freedom for all Americans, especially those who are either not white or who reject white identitarianism, like us.

We are Freedomists, we do not embrace racial identitarianism, we embrace ideas and ideals as our core identity and we reject the notion race is anything but a negative social construct that is a threat to human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing. Race is a myth and those who use it as a wedge in society or to shame or otherwise demean or limit others are of the same spirit as Adolf Hitler.

The assualt on “white identity”, something most all white people are not at all conscious of but are now being accused of gaining unfair advantage through, can only promote a white identitarianism reaction. In short, vilification of all white people as inherently racist and morally inferior to the alleged victim groups (POC, LGBTQ, etc) on the basis of this fictional “white identity” and “white supremacy conspiracy” pushes white people into a defensive circle.

Real talk here: identitarianism among “non white” groups in America today cannot pose a serious threat to white people who are 70% of the population and who control probably 90% of the wealth. This doesn’t make it morally good, we oppose all racial identitarianism, but it’s not the same level of threat.

The identitarianism of “non-white” “races” fomented by separatists and racialists, mostly the left, is morally problematic. But given the actual disadvantage these group have faced, it is understandable. Additionally, the fact the white “race” is some 70% of the population and that most members of other “races” are not very identitarian, means this has had little potential to harm anyone. But if “white identitarianism” becomes popular among most “white” people, it can seriously threaten the freedom of non-white people. As Freedomists we demand equity in freedom for all human beings, so clearly this is something we are alarmed by.

Is this nonsense about white identity being a mark of shame meant to bully white people, who are less likely to vote leftwing, into submitting to their policies? Is it actually meant to foment a white identity backlash to use the unrest as justification for more draconian violations of people’s basic civil rights?

It does not follow automatically that if white identitarianism becomes “awakened” in some way that the potential unrest it leads to could be contained. (The motto of the Nazi storm troopers was “Germany Awake!” and this is the kind of malevolent “awakening” the woke savages are seeming to want to provoke.)

It is possible that playing with such dangerous fire, awakening actual racial jingoism (white identitarianism as opposed to POC identitarianism and white supremacy as a counter to white guilt and white shaming) through unreasonable demonization of a majority of the population on the basis of an identity that they are not conscious of, would create something that cannot be contained.

So if we say “yes, white identity is dangerous”, we mean that if the majority of Americans, who are “white”, by the definition of the left, are vilified for being white, if their “identity” is treated as a badge of shame, whether they are conscious of that identity or not, then the result will be a sudden “awakening” to that “identity” that is itself dangerous.

The left are creating a nasty, self-fulfilling prophecy that white people are evil oppressors and all the world’s evils come from a white supremacy conspiracy to dominate the world for the glory and benefit of the white race. This is their narrative and, like the Nazis of Jewish lineage who hated the Jewish “race”, the white leftists find no irony in their anti-white racist bigotry.

Indeed, if you read the preachments of the left on the white race and substitute the word “Jew” for “white”, then you begin to see how truly vile and hateful this doctrine is.

Pushing “white people” into a corner where they have to hate themselves, give up every aspect of their culture and way of life, and submit to your fringe social experiments isn’t going to end well. The ACTUAL racists and white supremacists, infiltrated by the FBI who are positively fomenting this, must be loving this, and that is a very bad thing.

As Freedomists, we identify with Freedomist ideas and ideals, we are not racial or race conscious. We reject racial separatism, even the concept or there being any but the human race, and certainly any sense of racial supremacy. The idea of most white people becoming race conscious and feeling like it’s “us or them”, because they are so viciously attacked and shamed merely for being white, is q dangerous idea.

If most white people begin to embrace their race and the “advancement” of their race in an “us/them” paradigm, like the “oppressed” races are being encouraged to do, well, look for the rise of real white supremacy to a scale not even the FBI infiltrators and provocateurs can contain.

In such an event we Freedomists, who reject this kind of thinking, would find find ourselves both beset by the left if we are white or not POC loyal enough and attacked by the white pride loons, inspired and enflamed by the left and the FBI, for either not being “loyal” to the “race” or not being white.

White identitarianism as a jingoistic counter to the woke assault on “whiteness” is dangerous and if the left and the FBI, who seem to want to provoke this garbage, manufacture a “persecution complex” among white people, it could becomes THE major threat to freedom.

Why Become A Freedomist Subscriber?

Do you want to fight against the woke savages and their relentless totalitarian war on freedom, like “The Greatest Generation” fought the Nazis in World War Two? If you do, this is why you should BACK THE FREEDOMIST and become a subscriber.

We need you to back us and, we propose, and hope you’ll agree, you need us to give you smart and punchy content you can use to advance freedom yourself. Our focus is partially on arming you with both the facts and a disciplined, strong narrative you can use to defend freedom among those who aren’t totally partisan hacks for the woke savages.

Busy people with real work to do should have a source of news, inspiration, and empowerment that is concise where it can be and detailed where it must be. They shouldn’t have to put up with click-bait headlines, with endless ads, or with violations of their private data to serve those advertisers.

This is why we are launching a paywall model on this site. Our dream is to build a core team of experts and top thinkers to distell a daily dose of awesome that will enrich your life. We would rather have 100,000 average backers than depend on a few corporate backers who merely want our journalistoc soul in return.

If you hate the whole big tech oligarchy, want smarter content that pulls no punches, and want real inspiration and ideas that can improve your life, The Freedomist is here for you and we need your backing. We have so much more we need to do and we cannot do it without many backers.

Will you back us in exchange for an honest, smart, and unapologetic defense of your basic human rights, your human dignity, and your human flourishing in the face of the woke savage spirit that has infected our major institutions?

JOIN US NOW by choosing among plans that start at less than 20 cents per day! We need you in order to do what we do without having to rely on advertising.

This Is Woke “LEADERSHIP”

The mayors of our major cities have fallen prey to the mindless woke mobs and their asinine, contradictory demands. Worse is Portland. Real people are being hurt here. Murder rates are rising or going through the roof, they certainly aren’t going down, and a demand for more disarming the innocent and violating our sacred RIGHT to self-preservation isn’t going to help this at all.

The increased murder rates are “unprecedented” in modern times, according to A REPORT released in February of 2021. But it’s only getting worse, not better. Take away the top 30 most murderous cities and the US would have a far lower murder rate. What’s common in these cities is a high incidence of woke authoritarianism and low incidence of respect for human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing.

Violent crime is also a problem, with your chances of being a victim of violent crime in Detroit being 1 in 51. Given a number of years and you are unlikely to either not be a victim or to have a loved one be a victim.

The woke savage has no mercy. While this spirit loves to virtue signal, it’s actual concern for actual human beings is roughly rated at zero.

Our Mission Goes Beyond News Reporting

The clickbait headline that outrages you and only leaves you stressed and unhappy is what websites which thrive on hits must resort to. We are not such a site, although it is true some news we report will outrage you, as it should.

Our mission is to go beyond mere news reporting, because you need more than news that documents the slow to rapid advance of the woke savage freedom takers and their war on America’s goodness. Our mission also involves inspiration and solutions. You may not be inspired by everything nor find every solution useful in your circumstances, but we hope that, over time, you will find inspiration and workable solutions that are practical for you.

Every day we not only want to expose and confront the freedom takers, covering news fearlessly, but we want to move the needle in the direction of freedom, one person at a time, through inspiration and solutions which reach you where you live.

Being a subscriber to The Freedomist not only gives you greater access to this content, it also helps us avoid becoming a click-bait farm that merely feeds advertisers views. To do this work takes people and tools and to promote our message requires money, especially since we need to go outside the normal channels dominated by the big tech oligarchy.

Support us today at JOIN US

Do fewer laws equal less poverty?

Eben McDonald of Counterpoints writes about the way three European countries fought poverty with less laws and less taxes in The Economic Standard.

Eben writes, in part, “Data from the World Economic Forum can easily be used to demonstrate that the world’s most prosperous countries are market-oriented and business-friendly.”

Using Ireland, Switzerland, and Luxembourg as examples, with data to back it up, it becomes clear that economic growth demands that taxes and laws be kept to reasonable levels but that when they are, what we call human flourishing is possible. The weight of excessive taxes and laws, beyond their point of usefulness or where their costs to society outweigh their benefits, drags people and the economy down.

Our perspective is that it’s not JUST about these things, but they are important, it is also about addressing actual disadvantaged communities and groups of people as well as preserving a sociocultural foundation that is life-affirming and that promotes human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing.

We would argue from a Freedomist perspective that the “great reset” invoked by the World Economic Forum, would wage war on private ownership, entrepreneurship, productivity increases, and real economic growth, all the core elements needed to combat poverty. One may be excused to suspecting that poverty is a feature, not a bug, of this “great reset.”

Big Tech Blocks Covid Treatment Information

Connect the dots and follow the money to see why the big tech oligarchy are so desperate to block Covid treatment.

See this segment on the problem. The gist is this, “Sen. Johnson and Dr. Pierre Kory on the impact of censorship in fight against COVID-19 https://t.co/gemBdonw9p @SundayFutures @FoxNews @SenRonJohnson @PierreKory”

The big tech oligarchy is fighting hard to block information and free discussions around possible Covid-19 treatments. Their reasons may be partisan or monetary or both. The powers and entities benefiting from blocking information include the Chinese communist party, the Democratic Party, the lockdown governors, and big pharma. These are all the entities known to have deep hooks into the people who are part of the big tech oligarchy.

The net effect is a potential loss of life. Without free and open discourse, possible effective treatments are a no-go. This means we don’t even block crackpot theories, because the process of scientific exploration demands a “no heresies excluded” approach. Unless actual fraud is being conducted, our major discourse platforms have a moral duty to enforce a scientific standard, not an “orthodoxy against heresy” standard.

The platforms continue to show their lack of ethics and the ease with which their monopoly stranglehold over discourse and commerce, perhaps earned through better serving the market, is being abused now to interfere with the market.

The NOISE Of The Woke Savage Isn’t REALITY

The 1930s and 1940s seem like a golden age for our culture, although aspects of those times are best left behind. However, the excuse that the problems of those times, namely and mostly related to inequality on a racial or gender basis, warrant an assault on the underlying moral foundations of that culture is disingenuous. Our aim is to not merely restore the best elements and sociocultural constructs of this golden age of our culture but to advance further and to discard the flaws.

In many ways, but certainly not all, in order to advance American culture further to benefit more people, we need to go back to the 30s and 40s for inspiration, albeit not by simply trying to reconstitute the past.

Often we speak of the depraved culture or corrupt culture. When we do, we are speaking of the fake “culture” PRESENTED to us through the endless noise of the entertainment world, academia, and media, a loud and continuous noise presented as if IT was THE culture embraced by all.

A small qualifying statement is needed: we use the phrase “woke savage” to identify the hypothetical persona which is a threat to our our freedom and way of life. This is rhetorical flourish. Most people who consider themselves woke are not savages hell-bent on chaos or coercing others, but there are leading voices who sound more like the spirit of the woke savage. So, “woke savages” aren’t actual people, it simply a rhetorical device for identifying a type of extreme persona which people may tend to emulate to some degree or another, but it’s not an actual person per se. For instance, we may say President Biden at times gives lip service to or channels the spirit of the woke savage, but we aren’t saying he IS a woke savage.

Let’s begin with discussing the NOISE that presents itself to us everyday.

Most people in most places most of the time are not embracing the noise as something that reflects who they are. They may be foolishly, recklessly, bowing to it or being silent when it comes calling and demands their nods of approval. When they are told to stop seeing gender as a biological construct but as a social construct and yet also that sexual orientation is purely biological, they just nod along without sincerely agreeing because they “don’t need the hassle.”

The noise, filled with nonsense about race-baiting and gender-bending and flooded with utopian promises about how government can meet every need if only it had more power, begins to feel like the culture it is covering over. The noise isn’t the culture that is actually practiced by anyone save the hardcore partisan. No serious person who embraces a Judeo-Christian culture doubts their biological gender or that sexual orientation is mostly a choice, even if it has biological causes as well.

The average person who follows our Judeo-Christian moral tradition knows they are not racist just because of their skin color. They know that “the white race” isn’t any more prone to imperialism than any national groups of people throughout history who gained power and military advantage.

The noise presents what seems to us is a morally backward, barbaric libertinism. It presents this as the norm but the average person in this country still wants a happy marriage with their own children and a loving family life in a home they own. It is also true the average person doesn’t much care that others may want something different. They begin to bridle when they are vilified for being “cisgender breeders” and when their choice of marriage and family life is treated as if it is fringe.

Historians know that when you study the official records of a society you may not be seeing things as they really were in that society. The leavings of the record, the noise which covered over that society’s culture, may in fact be more fanciful or aspirational than reflective or accurate. Did this or that Pharaoh really conquer this place or win public furvor for their policies?

Often the official record is “clarified” or contradicted by archeology. We find that the record of many battles between Hittites and Egyptians is contradictory, both sides presenting an entirely different picture.

If one sees the “record” of our time it would seem like the vast majority of people were gender-bending, race-conscious, woke zealots who feared the earth was about to overheat and die unless we turned off technology and reverted to the stone age. But that “record”, all this noise, is a lie. It’s not how things are. It’s how those who make the most noise seem to want things to be and, sadly, it reflects their growing authoritarian intolerance toward any and all forms of dissent from their fake narrative.

The problem is that the noise is not without meaning or influence. The number of young people confused about gender, thanks to this noise, has skyrocketed and is only getting worse. Years ago we warned that the gender-bending agenda would come for our kids and that even public schools would pressure young people to not only accept and participate in this libertine depravity or be shunned and shamed. That is literally beginning to happen.

Eventually, if the people of the deeper culture acquiesce to the noise, the noise, like a virus, infects the whole and destroys it from within. Eventually, the noise, which is artificial and fake, replaces the real, but not necessarily with itself. The destroyed culture doesn’t just become like the noise, it will mutate in ways nobody expects and become something hideous or break down to chaotic ruin, a rule of the wild in which only the strong survive. The woke anti-culture can never win because it is not natural and doesn’t reflect the reality of human nature. It can, however, so destroy civilized culture, centered on marriage and the family, that what emerges is barbaric pre-culture, savagery.

The truth here is that the noise of this anti-culture of woke barbaric, libertine, authoritarianism cannot replace our deeper culture. But it can destroy it, leaving only a savage pre-culture in its wake. In this scenario, the economic and societal chaos that follows a country that embraces anti-culture as policy will lead to a savage pre-culture where only base survival instinct reigns and only the strong can survive.

The noise of gender-bending, race-baiting, earth-worshipping, and all these other anti-culture ways has no basis in reality or human nature. Creating policies based on this and teaching this as gospel to our children is mass suicide for our country. The archetypical “woke savage” with this anti-culture fake narrative should be shunned off the stage, not lionized or feared, let alone submitted to. This archetype, the woke savage, can be seen as morally criminal because it conducts its abuse against children on a massive scale by dementing their minds with this coerced fake narrative.

The woke savage is a caricature and an archetype that too many people in high places seem to increasingly emulate in real life. So we will use this archetype as shorthand for the overall agenda and its most ardent and more authoritarian perpetrators.

The noise generated by “woke savages” isn’t the culture. We are the culture if we hold on to our culture and resist the woke savge and its anti-culture. We have to insist on fundamental cultural truths, such as that marriage is one man and one woman and most children should be raised by their own biological parents. (Yes, adoption is a thing as well for orphans and abandoned children, who also deserve a father and mother.)

Our culture doesn’t need or demand coercion. In other words, while we may believe marriage is one man and one woman, we can respect those who don’t and who define things differently. We are not affected if your marriage is defined differently than ours, as long as that respect flows in both directions. But if your demands are for respect towards you that isn’t reciprocated, then we have a classic “either-or” scenario where it’s either we get our version of marriage or you get yours.

We can insist gender is biology, but there is no need to disrespect those for whom it is a social construct. For instance, if you want to be called “zir” and “dir” as your pronouns, we may respect that as long as you don’t make it a demand or go onto histrionic outrage when or if we “slip” and call you “he” or “him” because you LOOK to us like a he or a him. Respect that doesn’t flow both ways isn’t respect at all!

The fact Twitter, a major, if not the major, means of sociopolitical discourse in this country, bans anyone who doesn’t go along with their “gender as a social construct” ideology is an example of why people see the platforms as coercive and, frankly, bigoted. Their corporate culture, enforced in their “community standards”, is bigoted against those of a more traditional Judeo-Christian worldview! This may be their “right”, but it doesn’t mean it is right!

The woke anti-culture wants to redefine everything and wants a society classified by racial constructs into oppressed and virtuous groups versus oppressors who are inherently and unforgivably “racist”, but all of whom are non-genderee and undifferentiated, atomized cogs in their woke dictatorship’s machine. Additionally, the woke savage spirit seems to demand every major corporation, which controls our access and means to discourse and commerce, incorporate its edicts as “community standards” used to banish the dissenting.

To the credit of some platforms, these demands are not always agreed to, but the noise and pressure, now official, to do so is growing. Anyone, left or right, who runs afoul of the woke savage is finding it a tougher go on platforms that are more sensitive to the woke fringe noise than to their actual users.

Nothing these woke savage spirit invokes is rational, it doesn’t reflect reality and it doesn’t reflect human nature. Given time, any country that embraces this barbaric, primitive, and animalistic anti-culture will become a dystopian hellscape of pure ruin.

Our culture, founded on fundamental Judeo-Christian ideas and values, is within us and remains, for the most part, the way of life for most people in this country. It is the best culture in human history, despite the flaws of its people, which flaws are a reflection of deviations from the fundamental values of that culture, not a reflection thereof.

The woke savage wants to use deviations by some leaders and individuals of influence from our cultural foundation as a means of deconstruction and invalidation. It wants to tear down everything good and replace it with something unnatural, archaic, and backwards.

We have to stop listening to the noise. We have to stop bowing to the noise. We have to start making our own noise. We are a Judeo-Christian culture and our fundamental truths, principles, and values are not going to be surrendered! We will not bow to a small, vocal minority or the spirit of the woke savage anti-culture and its hard-core zealots whose totalitarianism is all too visible.

If you think gender is a social construct AND all who disagree should be bansihed or that all white people are racist, then you have joined the ranks of the barbaric anti-culture. If you go l think anyone who refuses to agree with your fake narrative should be canceled, then you are a totalitarian thug. We don’t have a dialogue. We don’t need to talk. You either back off or we back you off. You take your craven lust for power and go away.

Our right and our ability to preserve our Judeo-Christian culture and its ways in our lives, relationships, free associations, and communities cannot be questioned. Any entity, public or private, aiming at limiting our freedom and trying to make life hard for us, by abusing its monopoly stranglehold over our means of commerce and discourse, should be “nuked from orbit”, as it were.

We don’t demand everyone live as we do. We don’t even care if YOU think gender is a social construct! What we won’t submit to or tolerate is a demand that we abondon our way of life and cultural convictions about the very nature of humanity and human relationships so you can feel good about your choices. This means we will keep saying gender is 100% biological, marriage is best between one man and one woman for life, and all children should be raised by their own biological parents, while orphans and abandoned children should be adopted by a mom and dad.

Because we value pluralism and respect freewil, we don’t care if you disagree and organize yourself or your communities around different ideas and beliefs. In our schema, you are free to live what we see as a woke anti-culture, what you may see as “progress” or “evolution.” But in your schema, you don’t allow for dissent from your fake narrative, and yes we know you don’t think it is fake. You want your beliefs codified into law, you want punishments for dissent in the name of “anti hate speech”, you demand internal banishment for dissenters from all platforms where most all discourse and commerce MUST occur, and you demand children at the youngest age be indoctrinated with your ideas and shamed by public schools unless they participate in your lifestyle.

Some may argue, “it’s convenient that now that the Judeo-Christian worldview is being proscribed you traditionalists suddenly want to preach pluralism.” This is a valid criticism of our culture. It has accepted and embraced the idea that the coercive power should enforce its sociocultural constructs as law. But so has almost every culture in human history. The desire to construct laws around your sociocultural norms is itself a norm!

If anything “good” comes from the woke anti-culture and it’s attack on the Judeo-Christian culture it is a realization that in embracing the coercive power as a culture-enforcer we have sowed the seeds of our own ruin. The very apparatus our ancestors erected to enforce their sociocultural constructs in law is now being used to proscribe those constructs by force or through the monopolistic powers of mega corporations which control commerce and discourse.

The coercive power should absolutely enforce a free and pluralistic norm and punish those who infringe on the rights, persons, and property of others, including their rights to free association and free expression. And, yes, it should absolutely prevent a monopolistic cabal from infringing on the rights of others to create competitive structures and platforms their collusion aimed at their economic ruin.

When communications and internet infrastructure providers who have most of the market share banish dissenters or dissenting platforms, such as a browser blocking a website, then, yes, the coercive power has a vested interest in stopping this artificial manipulation of the marketplace. It is one thing for platforms to have their own community standards, it is another for them to go outside and try to interfere with other platforms to prevent competition.

But, for the most part, this is not the case, most of the woke savage ideation is contained within some of these platforms and it remains possible to build alternatives.

If we manage to vanquish the anti-culture of the woke savage, we cannot outlaw it or its practitioners. We cannot ever again rely on or seek the coercive power to enforce our sociocultural constructs. We must depend on the soft power of freewill participation to perpetuate and preserve our chosen way of life. If indeed our culture is as superior as we say it is, then purely voluntary participatory free association should be all we need to advance it and maintain it. Its obvious benefits and good fruits should be visible proof as to its veracity.

We do not condemn our ancestors. To do so would be to hold them to an impossible standard. The evolution of human civilization toward a voluntary free association instead of pure barbaric coercion has involved a process of thousands of years. What our ancestors did was lay the foundation upon which we could build our present understanding of culture as a voluntary participatory free association that ought not be coercively imposed. Without their achievements we could not even have this discussion.

We have the woke savages to thank for showing us rather graphically how our present system of state and monopoly corporate coercive controls is inherently flawed and poses a real threat to our human dignity and our culture. We must build a civilizational paradigm wherein culture is strictly voluntary and where the political and corporate worlds have almost nothing to do with sociocultural constructs between groups of people on freewill participation association.

But first we have to recognize and turn off the constant and deceptive noise. You who still embrace the norms of a Judeo-Christian culture are still in the majority. The noise-making woke savages are a fringe who have managed to grab ahold of the topmost parts of our institutions and they are using this platform, built and funded by us, to abuse the entire country with their anti-culture barbarism.

We must turn off the noise from these corrupted institutions, especially the two major political parties and mega corporations infected by these savages, and we must make our own noise through strictly voluntary alternative institutions. To use a phrase our woke enemies coined, “we must be the change we want to see.”

What we want to see is sociocultural constructs on the basis of freewill participatory association alone and a pluralism that allows people to form freewill participatory associations as they deem fit so long as this is voluntary and so long as it respects the rights, persons, and property of others. We don’t simply want to roll back the clock to when our culture was enforced coercively or its privileges limited by race or gender: these are flaws we happily abandon because they are actually antithetical to the deeper foundations of our culture!

The noise of the anti-culture is a lie, it is a fake narrative relying on the hard, but weaker, force of corporate and governmental coercion aimed at the rights of freewill participatory association, which right is owned by individuals. Yes, when you deplatform someone from a platform that is the predominant way we engage in social and economic intercourse because they defy your woke anti-culture, then this is coercion. It may be legal coercion and our responses may be simply “unhitching” from your “martix”, but it is still coercive by intent.

Our solution to the woke anti-culture coerciveness of the state and monopoly corporations is actually not to coerce them back. In this case, fighting fire with fire only leads to more burning and damage. We can never return to the idea of coercing even these coercive private companies, we simply have to build alternative structures outside their control and only when or if they seek to damage our alternative structures in illegal ways should we appeal to law.

This is a process. It isn’t going to happen overnight. It is simply our only path.

First, recongize that the woke anti-culture promoted by all this noise still remains a lunatic fringe. Even some of these monopoly corporations are beginning to see that the woke anti-culture noise is distracting and harmful to their own operations. It is not impossible to think that some of these platforms may realize they have swung too far from the sentiment and interest of their users and they must move back toward tolerance and liberty. If they don’t, eventually they will lose users and new alternatives will emerge.

Second, recognize that our own collective embracing of coercive power to enforce our sociocultural constructs has created the very spirit of the woke savage that is now haunting for us. We can never return to that.

Third, recognize that our Judeo-Christian culture is superior only because its benefits and fruits can be seen and achieved without any form of coercion. If we have to use coercion to maintain our culture than our culture our culture is inferior.

Fourth, recognize the need to support and participate in alternative structures, including things like our new platform we are building, that perpetuate our culture on a strictly voluntary basis. We need our own means of discourse, economic interaction, and sociocultural connections that isn’t dependent upon the structures that are presently dominated by the anti-culture.

Fifth, we must NOT become that which our enemies have become, intolerant monsters who barely consider people outside their sociocultural constructs to be completely human. We cannot become bigoted and intolerant toward people whose views and practices don’t align with our culture or religion. This won’t stop the woke savages from lying about us and calling us bigots for simply preferring our way of life above all others, for them it’s “submit or be canceled”, for us it remains, “live and let live” and we cannot abandon that.

Transcending The Ruling Class and Their Control

Willem IV- Our hope and our agenda is to transcend the exploitation and freedom-taking ways of the ruling class and those entities which control our sociocultural, economic, and political environment today, much to our loss and their selfish gain.

The answer is unexpected! The answer is to use the power of organic cohesiveness to intentionally create clustered housing and/or to use the principles of a clustered living lifestyle. We propose a lifestyle rooted in a shared mutual-benefit material culture and Judeo-Christian values in freewill participation with others.

Here are some of the main entities we believe are causing most of the exploitation, if you are coming from the freedomist center-left perspective, and who are greatest threat to freedom, if you are coming from the freedomist center-right perspective: PayPal, Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, Google, Microsoft, John Deere, Ford, Chevy, Chrysler, Tyson, Visa, Master Card, Wal Mart, The GOP, the DNC, Walt Disney, Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, Fedex, UPS, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, IBM, Apple, Fox, ABC, CBS, NBC, and Netflix.

We estimate that these 30 entities control more than 50% of most people’s daily social and economic life as well as almost 70% of their political or civic lives. If all of them deplatform you, then every other entity would follow, effectively condemning you to an internal banishment the likes of which has never been possible in human history. If we grow our list to the most powerful 100 entities we find that the average person is virtually a prey to whatever pressures they bring to bear.

Transcending them means we gain sociocultural and economic independence and our own civic/political clout through an approach that includes both individual and local scale unilateral action and massive scale collaboration and cooperation. We envision a reality FOR OURSELVES wherein our lives, including our sociocultural and economic environment, will reflect our beliefs, values, and convictions alone and not be subjected to the influence or control of these entities.

It is our sacred right of self-determination in freewill participation with others to pursue such a course of deliberate self-preservation from forces and entities that are violating our human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing. We owe no explanations and do not need to ask permission. Our approach is not for everyone but if we choose to define marriage, family, and community according to ancient traditions and values, we take nobody else’s right to do otherwise away from them!

(In other words, if you don’t like our concept of marriage, family, extended family, and communities of trust, then don’t become part of one of our clustered living communities. Nobody is forcing you to be part of such an extended familial community!)

Our true aim is transcendence of their structures and systems of control over our lives and circumstances and the development of our own relationships, associations, communities, structures, and institutions which reflect, as opposed to attacking, our values and lifestyle.

Before we can begin transcending their systems we must understand their nature and extent and just how dramatic and extensive our response will need to be. We must realize that our very lifestyle of libertine atomization coupled with collective dependency must fundamentally and unilaterally change in a very big way.

Our society has been collectivized by a monopoly of wealth and power ruled by a class of people whose vision for the future is positively hostile to any Judeo-Christian understanding of a good and just society and to human roghts, human dignity, and human flourishing in general for everyone.

To reiterate and make it clear: it is our position that unless and until you make a dramatic change in lifestyle from libertine atomization within a collective dependency, regardless of what you think your ideology or party leaning is, you will never, ever break free from these entities unless you personally become quite wealthy.

Moreover, we propose the basic tenets of historic Christian and Jewish moral and ethical orthodoxy are the path to a better future because they not only have worked before but are eminently suited to the needs of the 21st century. We desperately need a path of transcendence from the controlling entities which are threatened to destroy every semblance of human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing.

A good and just society, we believe, is most assured when most all children are raised by their biological or adopted mother and father within a living home and who are united in lifelong monogamous love. Our vision, unlike that of our opponents and that which ALL THESE ENTITIES PROMOTE, is to follow and build our own sociocultural and economic norms in a freewill participatory association instead of trying to coerce or bully people into this way of life.

The ideal home is connected in some form of freewill participatory and/or familial bond with a few dozen or so other homes. This home can meet its needs on a single salary or two part-time salaries or through a small business. This home is either singularly or within a smaller cluster of 5-10 other homes in a housing development, at least 70% self-sustaining for basic food needs and 100% for energy and shelter needs. This home has light impact on land and pays little or no property taxes dorec, thus ensuring its owners (husband and wife) can survive with little cash if need be.

To acheive this requires a high degree of organic cohesiveness, which means shared beliefs, values, and convictions which translate to a lifestyle and material culture that allows for maximum collaboration and mutual self-reliance without the need for top-down hierarchical systems of control. When the starting point is a Jewish and/or Christian worldview and sociocultural framework, you have the ability to connect on a mutual benefit basis with people of like affection. You also have access to ideals and principles which are both proven since ancient days and useful for now and the future.

Indeed, when one considers the sociocultural application and practice of the Judeo-Christian belief system, it should be clear that a clustered living lifestyle is in fact essential to the Christian and ancient Hebrew faith.

Clustered living as if in an extended familial unit, small tribal clan, or self-sustaining village is the only practical and material way to remove at least 70% or more of your material life from any dependency on these types of controlling entities. Again, let’s be clear: only by becoming physical self-sufficient can you transcend these controlling entities and only through clustered living can less than super rich people gather the resources to fulfill that aim.

You cannot do this on your own. You cannot boycott these entities into changing. At present, if they banish you internally, there is little real hope you as an individual without a decent support system will be able to thrive and prosper. On the other hand, if and when we see clustered living based on some form of organic cohesiveness emerge, then people are less likely to even gain the notice of these entities let alone have to endure being banished internally by them.

Clustered living through a modern adaptation of the ancient multi-family extended household community, rooted in Judeo-Christian sociocultural values, and practiced as a small village of closely related families or a tribal group, is the only viable way a small group of people can liberate themselves from this top-down control.

In cases where people gather and meet in clusters with local and like-minded people who cannot physically create a clustered housing development, a high degree of mutual support and mutual self-reliance as well as mutual assurance can still be obtained. Eventually, that cluster of people realizes many of the benefits of clustered living even though their residences aren’t clustered in one development.

The simple and unavoidable truth is that UNLESS you are willing to cluster together for mutual support and profit with like-minded people until most all of your basic necessities can be met with you and those you are closest to, then you cannot expect liberation from these controlling entities.

Of course, if you are independently wealthy you could be more free and/or you could even directly fund such a clustered housing development after you found like-minded people. Most people aren’t and, while we also promote the idea of individuals becoming financially prosperous as a means of liberation, the likelihood of most people in any short term doing so is fairly low.

Basically, for most people, clustering together in some capacity for mutual support with people you have a strong organic cohesiveness with (in our case, with a strong Judeo-Christian moral and social foundation) is the shortest and overall best approach to liberation. Just whining and trying to boycott entities you really cannot live without on your own are not mature responses.

We can explore exactly how to approach this, but what it important is a close degree of mutual self-reliance and mutual profitability in connection with people you have a strong organic cohesiveness on spiritual and sociocultural as well as as economic grounds.

Aside from this kind of approach, all efforts to extricate yourself from these entities that do not involve a massive structural reform of society from bottom to top are doomed. While massive structural reform of society may not be impossible in the long-term and may be a goal, it is highly inprobable in any event. It is, however, virtually impossible if the would-be reformers are not themselves materially independent of these controlling entities.

We can transcend these entities but because they control so much, this requires an approach like the clustered living approach with like-minded people for mutual profit and support. This is in fact a major lifestyle change that will initially be hard, inconvenient, and not without its risks. But, for all that, it is the most viable response to the present crisis for most people.

Critical Theory Is Authoritarianism Pointed Nowhere

Circle Logic and Insane Degrees Of Relationship As Justification For Authoritarianism

Willem IV- Rooted in the dialectical thinking of Marx and Engels and made famous by the Frankfurt School, “critical theory” is both insanely opposite of critical thinking and a justification for authoritarian regimes. Basically, it uses circle logic and insane degrees of relationship to connect cause and effect in order to delegitimize historic institutions that stand athwart a path of radical atomization of individuals that renders them hopelessly dependent upon corporations and/or the state.

Circle logic is based on circular reasoning. If we say, “the Bible is true, therefore you should believe it”, this isn’t proof. We are using our conclusion as validation of itself without offering hard evidence.

In circle logic, the connection may be less direct, for instance if we say “people who think they are not human but animals are more suicidal, therefore society’s lack of accommodation for them is unust”, we are using a form of circle logic. The effect, being more suicidal, has no proven connection to the cause, the lack of society accommodating “species benders”, or whatever we want to call these folks, by refraining from using terms like “people” or even “human” for fear the species benders would be offended.

“Insane degrees of relationship” means you find multiple degrees of separation which connect people, groups, or events to other people, groups, or events and then make a causal statement of relationship between the two. If someone with the same last name as you, some 200 years ago, did a thing that wasn’t good, then you, despite perhaps having a name your grandfather adopted (so you are not blood kin to that family, which isn’t blood kin to the original malefactor), are “related” to the original misdeed and bear collective shame, if not collective guilt.

The effect is that those who wish to be a certain way, prefer a certain way, associate together according to their values and identity a certain way and those who see the world a certain way must be shamed and coerced into something not to their liking in order to assuage those whose preferences and etc. are in the decided minority. The majority must literally change how they refer to others and even themselves for fear of corporate or official entities doing real harm to their economy and/or social life.

In a society in which the great bottleneck of commerce and discourse or social life itself flows through monopoly corporations and their platforms and institutions, where most commercial and social activities demand access to these platforms and institutions, it is no longer necessary to invoke the state in hard authoritarianism. It is soft authoritarianism invoking the so-called “rights” of private platforms to regiment the culture and economy in ways that are harmful to individuals and that violate their human dignity.

Here are a few for-instances:

– Around 40% of eCommerce happens through Amazon, 67% of eCommerce flows through the top 10 eCommerce companies.

– 51% of all banking is dominated by the top 13 banks.

– According to this report, the top 5 social media platforms that DOMINATE social life and discourse, have a 98% market share, “The leading platform in the Social Media market is Facebook with 69% social media market share in 2019, followed by Pinterest with 14% Social Media market share Twitter with 8% Social Media market share, YouTube with 4% market share, Instagram with 4% share, and Other Social Media platforms with 2% social media market share.”

– Only 26% of transactions are by cash, while credit and debit cards, run by Visa, Master Card, and American Express, account for 51% of transactions.

– The top 10 retailers control over 45% of the retail market, the top 100 controlling more than 80%.

– PayPal processes over 54% of all online transactions and the top 14 online processors account for 89% of online transactions.

The fact almost ALL these corporations have woke communist adherants at the top and/or as owners, again understanding that woke communism is different from 20th century state communism, is alarming to be sure. If all of them agree you are persona nom grata, good luck surviving or having a voice or social life. The concentration of wealth and power and the stunning lack of ideational diversity within these entities is the very face of modern woke communism in America today.

The counter, using the state to “fix” the monopoly corporations and their platforms, may actually be as problematic as the disease. Our approach via unilateral change from within through absolutely freewill participatory association doesn’t change the fact we see the top 100 modern mega-corporations in same light as major landed sovereignties. Both entities exert societal control by degrees of authoritarianism, which may be hard, as in the state, or soft, as in deplatforming. Using one against the other is like casting out the devil in the name of Lucifer.

What leads to this soft to hard authoritarianism is the core concept that the only way to “solve” these “problems”, as proposed by “critical theory”, which defies all tenets of “critical thinking”, is to massively alter all societal structures. And the only way one can force a change in sociocultural norms, down to language itself and how people relate to one another, which runs counter to what people trust and are comfortable with, is some means of short-circuiting or suppressing the individual’s critical thinking and freewill. In short, some form of manipulation, fraud, or force must be used.

If you brainwash people through lies and coercion into accepting things not for their own good and without them being fully informed as to the cause, the potential risks, and the effect as well as long-term intent, then you violate their innate human spiritual sovereignty, agency, and dignity. Critical theory is itself an authoritarian assumption: it seems to say that society has been written this way by the coercive enterprise of corporate and state agencies and can only be righted by the same.

One critical theory advocate claimed that the emergence in the early 20th century of all-powerful superheroes like Superman was part of an effort to acculturate people to the all-powerful fascist state, like Hitler and Mussolini. This is circle logic and insane degrees of relationship gone awry and the only “solution” is to proscribe any such materials and to delegitimize those who peddle it as Nazis.

Critical theory, like communism, is a term that hardly portrays the underlying theory. Communism implies community, but in 20th century communism, community is meaningless and only the state matters. In 21st century woke communism, management of society by monopoly corporations and the state replaces community. Likewise, critical theory implies some form of multidisciplinary critical thinking approach to society, but in truth there is no real criticalt thinking.

Critical theory is simply and only authoritarianism and its underlying pretzel logic justifications used to fool or cow people into accepting chains of bondage. Critical theory is invalid from any spiritual, moral, or logical standard you might wish to apply.

While many aims and goals, such as fighting fictional bogeymen (such as “white supremacy”) or fulfilling utopian promises (like “free housing for all), are invoked by critical theory, in practice it points nowhere. Its only true aim is to grow power for those in power at the expense of everyone else, but as to societal aims, it points nowhere and will not acheive any good for society.

Unlike the totalitarianism of the 20th century, which rather explicitly stated that its totalitarian structures were intentional and necessary for society, the critical thinking, or woke communism, totalitarians of today do all they can to mask both the authoritarian roots of their ideas and the totalitarian intent of their agenda. Also unlike the authoritarians of the 20th century, who tended mostly to rely on the state as a monopoly holder of economic and political power, today’s woke communists are happy to use the corporation itself, the corporation in partnership with the state, or the state alone, all controlled by a single interconnected ruling class, to reach their goals.

The gender-bending, race-baiting, and Nazi-mongering are all merely a means of softening people up, undermining institutions which can resist corporate and government control and liberate individuals from dependency. The aim has nothing to do with protecting rainbow people or minority “races”, nor actually confronting actual Nazis. The aim is total monopoly comtrol as an end that justifies any means.

Modern monopoly platforms are to woke communists what the state was to Marxist-Leninists in the 20th century. The new politburo combines shot-callers in the corporate world and the political world into one loosely connected whole and “critical theory” provide the “validation” for this soft authoritarianism. The aim is still the atomization of the individual, the end of personal independence and private property by individuals, and the collectivizing of society under centralized hierarchical control.

The proposed “Great Reset”, touted by the World Economic Forum, for instance, started with the phrase, “you will own nothing, and like it.” This by an organization that is run by and for mega international corporations which purport to be capitalist enterprises. Herein is woke communism explained: the use of wokeness born by critical theory to soften up society for mass collectivization under the rule of a few monopoly corporations and governments.

It isn’t a conspiracy. The pervasive acceptance of this new totalitarianism by most shot-callers in every major institution causes an apparent comity of action that is born more from organic cohesiveness among the actors, who share the same worldview, than any planning or conspiring among them. The fact they are using the illogical methodology of critical theory to divide and soften up society, leading to an assault on institutions like marriage, family, and community, is merely an outgrowth of their own parochial interests and stems also from inflated egocentric grubbers who imagine they alone know what’s best for everyone.

They may indeed have “good” intentions, but their underlying assumptions, rooted in authoritarian nonsense like critical theory, prevent them from seeing that they are in fact “the baddies.” People of EVERY single racial, ethnic, or religious background in every country who embrace some varied form of the new totalitarianism acts almost as if in concert when no real coordination occurs.

This woke communism is somewhat like China’s new Maoism, only it also adds gender-bending and critical race theory aspects of critical theory to soften up society just as Mao’s “great leap forward” did in 1950’s China. China’s new Maoism uses the corporation and a limited free market to produce goods and services, maximizing efficiency, but remains as authoritarian as ever.

Critical theory is dangerous because wherever it gains purchase, human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing become untenable. Critical theory is authoritarianism, period.

If you want to know of a culture leader, politician, or corporate leader is a totalitarian loon, ask them to renounce critical theory and all its components. If they don’t unequivocally do so, mark them as totalitarians and do all you can to extricate yourself from their influence or dependency upon them.

If any leader who holds a position of public office or public trust or who is followed by millions refuses to name, renounce, and confront those who are using the techniques of critical race theory, calling everyone racist or Nazis, then they are nothing more than totalitarians. Moreover, if they refuse to defend the rights of individuals in free association to build and form marital, familial, and community bonds and relationships in preference to their own core beliefs, values, and convictions, then you automatically know this person is a totalitarian.

A holistic view of society, seeing how things and people are connected and interdependent, isn’t a bad thing. This multidimensional and multi-faceted kind of quantum thinking can be an excellent way to solve problems within the broader scope of logic, reason, and critical thinking. This kind of intersectionalism is logical and fact-based. But critical theory invokes intersectionality in tenous ways through circle logic and insane degrees of relationship. It does not identify real problems or real solutions and yet it demands all the tools of authoritarianism (censorship, canceling, deplatforming, criminalizing) applied by corporations and/or the state against relatively powerless people who depend upon them to survive.

Critical theory is, basically and simply, authoritarianism. Period. Full stop. It has no logic and it serves no common good. Its adherants are being fooled into accepting controls and dependency which violate their basic human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing. Its proponents are using this, albeit some of them unconsciously, to soften up society and gather power unto themselves.

It is necessary to confront critical theory as an authoritarian ideology, a modern form of woke communism, that must be confronted. Its innocent adherants must be liberated through peaceful persuasion and outreach. Its proponents who use it to advance their power must be treated with deserved contempt and every effort must be made to disassociate from them, especially from dependency upon them and anything they control.

Is It The End Of America?

When you have a long view of history and understand how whole civilizations rise and fall it is easy to see the signs that America is on a path of self-destruction. Everything from libertine cultural barbarity to massive government debt and the growing monopolistic nature of the market points to a day of reckoning that won’t be pretty.

But is America doomed, is it really the end of America?

Going back to having a long view of history, the doom of any society can seem to take decades. For instance, one can see the rot that would destroy the western half of the Roman Empire infect the whole empire way back some hundreds of years before the final collapse in 476 AD. But this fall was delayed in the whole empire and prevented in half that empire in ways nobody could have foreseen in, say, 300 AD.

America is in fact tearing down its spiritual, moral, cultural, economic, and civic foundations and rendering its entire apparatus of civilization weak and inflexible, corrupt and insensible to changing circumstances, and hostile to its own citizenry. The rise of the woke totalitarians, the cancel culture extremists, the corporate monopolies, and the neocommunist political class are all but SYMPTOMS of spiritual and cultural rot. The backwards, savage barbarians who usually threaten a civilization from outside its frontiers are in fact firmly ensconced within and at the top of all of our major institutions.

This does not necessarily mean America is doomed. This does not necessarily mean that the trajectory of self-destruction will remain on course or at the present high speed. It can suddenly slow down, veer to the side, and even reverse course given the right set of circumstances. All throughout time it has been a “humor of history” for unexpected and unlikely things to completely change the atmosphere and balance of power in the blink of an eye.

Those who know history tend to be highly dubious about “inevitability”, save in the broadest sense that old civilizations die of spiritual depravity and new civilizations rise on the wings of spiritual awakening. In any period of decline and fall it is not set in stone either that the old paradigm is going to fall soon or that the transition to the new paradigm will not be peaceful.

Going back to the Roman Empire, the civilizational apparatus in the west fell apart but in the eastern half, the old paradigm of Classical Civilization was peacefully replaced by the new paradigm of Byzantine Civilization. What we see in this one sample is that when an empire embraces the new paradigm it remains and when it refuses to make the transition it falls.

America is an empire.

When we say “empire” you may be thinking of an emperor and an imperial government and of imperialism mixed with some form of authoritarianism. Come to think of it, our empire is beginning to take on those character flaws of empire, but that is not what we mean by empire.

An empire is an expensive landed sovereignty consisting of many entities and nationalities which are united under a broad legal code and common ideals. Empire speaks to the large size, the multiple nationalities, and the single broad unitary legal code more than the form of government. A highly decentralized empire that gives its constituent entities and people groups a high degree of self-determination within a broad legal code tends toward stability and prosperity more than a centralized empire with an authoritarian system.

For evidence of this, consider our empire has lasted nigh unto 250 years compared to the short run of the Soviet empire!

As America sees its spiritual depravity leading to the symptoms thereof, including a corrupt and authoritarian monopoly of power and wealth, it feels like doom approaches. But doom is not inevitable.

What is the path that will save our empire and revive our civilizational apparatus? Basically, the path is a new spiritual awakening that results in a new civilizational paradigm. Such a transition has no room for the monopolists, the totalitarians, or the barbaric libertines. But this is not a matter of outlawing them per se, it is a wholesale spiritual and sociocultural rejection of them and their ideas from the populace. They simply become pariahs and outcasts in the eyes of most people, most all of whom have internalized the new paradigm as part of their very identity.

The transition from the dying and old civilizational paradigm to the new comes from within the spirit, mind, and heart of each person who rejects the old and internalizes the new. Each person who embraces the new paradigm does their small part in saving this empire from ruin.

The new civilizational paradigm is, we propose, the path to revive our land and fulfill its ancient promise of freedom with liberty and justice for all. As individuals and then freewill participatory associations of such people form and collaborate, the forces unleashed by them in the spiritual and cultural life of America become supernaturally charged and all-powerful.

The path to save our empire is like that of the eastern Roman Empire, it is the path of spiritual awakening that embraces the new civilizational paradigm, one person, one family, and one community at a time!

It is not true that America is doomed UNTIL that doom comes. But it is true that our spiritual depravity, which is leading to cultural barbarism and rising totalitarianism among our ruling class, will lead to the doom of our empire if it remains unchecked.

It begins with us, as individuals, rejecting the spiritual depravity and cultural barbarism, it begins with a spiritual awakening, and it grows as we embrace the new civilizational paradigm and begin organizing our lives, relationships, associations, and communities around this.

America is not doomed. The current trajectory is not inevitable. What remains to be seen is if all or parts of this land are saved from the doom slowly building in the spiritual and cultural rot that is growing within every major institution. This rot may take years or whole generations to reach its point of failure, so we may have little time or lots of time, or we may endure a dark winter under the boot of woke totalitarianism before enough people realize their need to embrace a new spiritual awakening and a new civilizational paradigm.

None of this is inevitable. The choice begins within each of us and then extends beyond us as we seek to awaken others and build new relationships and associations based on the new civilizational paradigm. To fulfill America’s promise, we must realize that the heart of that promise is a new civilization rooted in Judeo-Christian ideals and the vision of an empire of freedom with liberty and justice for all.

Our path is fulfillment or doom. Whether all or parts of America will choose the path of life remains an open and unanswered question.

Main

Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!

Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here