Anti-Americanists, using SJW moral constructs in defiance of American Rule of Law standards, are busy working to use “social justice” as a justification to assure the corporate-state-media machine narrative is further protected by strictly limiting how humans can share their lived experiences and deconstruct them through the lens of adult human beings as opposed to the unhealthy and unwholesome Peter Pen lenses these Anti-Americanists view the world through.
To put it more simply, they want to significantly limit, if not eliminate, any semblence of ‘fair use’ in copyright law to block content creators on various social media platforms from creating content that undermines the official MSM-CCP-DNC narrative the “left” wants to force down everyone’s throats and eyes and ears and every human pore.
Gathering a coven of ill-informed leftists to craft documents even attempting to justify such actions in the name of social justice has thus far produced the kind of laughable results you’d expect from a gang of ‘lived experience’ ‘scholars’ attempting to formulate rational thought based on the actual evidence at hand. It appears the attempted drafters have demonstrated in their own words a fundamental, rudimentary lack of understanding of the very copyright laws they are seeking to change, end, or replace.
The more lies you tell to create your power, the more resources you will have to bring to bear to protect those lies from being exposed by your competition. This is what is going on right here, yet another escalation between free thought and thought control, with thought control about to take on billions more dollars in expense to attempt to enforce.
Perhaps the Empire of Lies might not have infinite resources, and if so, the legislative fruit of these first steps, should they be passed, would even more dramatically hasten the end of the Empire of Lies on the weight of its own mounting enforcement debt and unintentional cost to the Empire as a whole in terms of creating flourishing from the citizens this Empire controls.
From redstate.com
2022-01-17 21:30:09
Excerpt:
Now a massive astroturfing effort is happening in the field of copyright law, and anyone who produces creative content should be paying close attention. As I wrote last week, there are major problems with the American Law Institute’s Restatement project, starting with how the project was initiated (at the request of a Google-funded, anti-copyright law activist professor) and the Lead Reporter’s unacknowledged conflicts of interest. Major flaws in the draft Restatement have been pointed out by other prominent copyright law scholars, a bipartisan group from Congress, the Register of Copyrights (the director of the Copyright Office), and even Advisors to the project. All of these groups essentially claim that the Restatement incorrectly interprets the Copyright Act and the policy preferences of the Reporters are improperly included. A letter to ALI from 10 of the project’s advisors states:
The Draft has a variety of problems including inaccurately summarizing the text of the Copyright Act, confusing explanations of important principles and misleading illustrations. Moreover, as further detailed below, these problems uniformly reflect an unduly restrictive view of copyright law that is not consistent with the robust statutory rights granted by Congress to authors.
