The same judge who presided over the Michael Flyn case is now ruling that the American government cannot use a healthcare edict known as Title 42 to reject migrant families that might have Covid-19 or been exposed to Covid-19.
A federal judge on Thursday directed the Biden administration to stop using a public health law invoked at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic to expel migrant families with children from the U.S.-Mexico border.
Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia certified all migrant families in U.S. border custody as class members in a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, and barred the government from expelling them under the public health edict, known as Title 42.
Haiti is an insecure hell hole of corruption and inefficiency led by people without morals and it is no wonder tens of thousands want to flee to the US. But while the Biden administration practically rolls out the welcome mat for Hispanic migrants/refugees from the south, the African-descended Haitians are not welcome.
The US is unceremoniously and without any hearing for asylum seekers deporting over 12,000 Haitians to their homeland which is riven by disaster, from an assassination of the President to an earthquake to ongoing economic collapse. If any group of people could be called refugees, these people certainly can, but the woke administration for all its claims of caring for people of color more than anyone else is brutally and with historic speed sending people who are far more vulnerable and at risk than anyone else back while welcoming, how shall we see, rather lighter skinned migrants who are more well off and less vulnerable.
The people of Haiti have a country ruled by maniacs, to be blunt, and controlled by international agencies and global corporations in a way that the average Haitian has no hope or means of changing a thing. They are true victims without any realistic way to save themselves, no matter how hard they work.
One wonders why the Haitians are being removed so brutally, with nary a word of protest from the social justice media, but clearly the very notion of importing more black people seems to offend Democrats.
Central Americans have also crossed the border in comparable numbers without being subject to mass expulsion, although Mexico has agreed to accept them from the U.S. under pandemic-related authority in effect since March 2020. Mexico does not accept expelled Haitians or people of other nationalities outside of Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.
We suspect if we dig deeper that, in truth, importing millions of brown-skinned vote slaves who are also cheap labor is enough for the Democrats and their Republican collaborators, but accepting genuine refugees whose skin is black is off the table. In both cases, whether accepted or not, these people in both camps are being treated like cattle, dehumanized, and either retained for exploitation or expelled because they are of African descent.
We live in the dawning of new Western Empire, under the banner of globalism but aimed at world domination by a mostly white ruling class in the West via such entities as the UN, WTO, IMF, World Bank, and others. This is the end of “the republic”, or the period of relative decentralization, at least on a global scale. The desire is to ultimately turn all countries into puppets of a corporate ruling class mostly living in the West and mostly white male in composition.
The irony of this coterie of ruling class thugs using things like rainbow politics, alt-gendered social experiments, white-shaming, social and racial justice, equality and economic justice is that the very ruling class pushing these things to destroy the social fabric and unsettle society are quite against any of these things. In short, it’s a sham. Everyone being fired up to change the very shape and structure of society to fit these theoretical fantasies is being used to undermine the social order in order to pave the way for authoritarianism.
But there us only room at the top of an empire for one Caesar. As much as the ruling class think their unofficial and informal junta of around 100 or so top people can share power once they eliminate all competition to their unholy alliance, the truth is all of these grandees are at risk of falling victim to the same “canceling” as they are orchestrating against others.
“It (Caesarism)…is not dictatorship, not the result of one man’s overriding ambition, not a brutal seizure of power through revolution. It is not based on a specific doctrine or philosophy. It is essentially pragmatic and untheoretical. It is a slow, often century-old, unconscious development that ends in a voluntary surrender of a free people escaping from freedom to one autocratic master.” (From: pg. 5 in 1st edition Introduction, and pg. XI in “The Coming Ceasars” by Amaury De Riencourt)
Let’s be clear on two points: the entire new alt-gendered sociocultural paradigm being pushed so hard now is a sham and will be discarded as soon as possible and that there can only be one Caesar if the ruling class coalition wins its way. The emergence of that Caesar will likely be extremely violent.
This new empire will not be as universal as it aims, and it won’t even have unopposed control over the lands it rules. There will always be a growing core of people who find gaps for freedom and build parallel structures that are proof against all the efforts by the new Caesar to shut them down.
Ultimately, the West and and every civilization dominated by its rulers will suffer failure and collapse. The measures needed to gain and keep such monopoly power will bankrupt this empire long before it becomes invincible.
But ONE SINGLE Caesar is coming and must come, because in the end, when it comes to empire, there can only be ONE Caesar at a time.
If the stark architecture of the Federal Reserve building looks a bit like Albert Speer designed it in “neoclassical-fascist”, akin to the Soviets, the Nazis, and other dictatorship such as Italy under Mussolini and Spain under Franco, perhaps it was a subconscious admission as to the true intentions behind the creation of this financial and monetary behemoth.
1913 will forever be a dark year in American history: the 16th Amendment allowing the creation of the IRS and the Federal Reserve Act of the same year laid the groundwork for an emerging authoritarianism and gross levels of corruption our country may just find to be fatal to the republic.
According to CNBC, the Fed is “under an ethics review” after Senator Elizabeth Warren sent letters to 12 Fed Presidents “demanding stricter ethics in stock buying.” But the “ethics review” ordered by Fed chairman Jerome Powell is unlikely to deal with the fundamentals of our 1913 mistake, a mistake as awful as the bit in the Constitution that allowed for slavery, only through the IRS and the Fed, every American who isn’t in the corporate and political ruling class has become mostly subjected to these two freedom-busting organizations.
The CNBC article said, “Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell directed staff to review the central bank’s ethics rules for appropriate financial activities after disclosures that several senior central bank officials made multiple multimillion-dollar stock trades in 2020, while others held significant investments.”
The very notion this is anything but theater meant to assuage deeper, legitimate concerns about the Fed basically “monetizing” all Americans’ labor for the benefit of the few is itself either naivety or the ultimate form of propaganda collaboration between a phony press operation and a corrupt ruling class. The obvious investments by these bank officials are paltry compared to the true depths and breadths of thievery being officially sanctioned and facilitated by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.
The only solutions are to repeal the 16th Amendment, devolve almost all Federal power save for national defense, repeal the Federal Reserve Act, return to the Gold Standard forthwith, and create new Constitutional Amendments to establish term limits, a balanced budget requirement, the creation of a Council of Censors to try all officials who violate the Bill of Rights in their most generous interpretation, and to establish Domestic Nations and Homelands for them with ownership by their tribal governments and not the Federal Government.
None of these measures, save the last two perhaps, are likely to gain purchase among America’s elected officials who will decry them as impossible, fantastical, and even radical. The Fed will hold its “ethics review” that will make surface suggestions and then keep pillaging our economic productivity in favor of the extremely few at the expense of almost everyone, especially productive workers in the middle class.
One may see in the creation of such Leviathan-like institutions the obvious signs of a civilization in deep and alarming moral, spiritual, and ethical decadence that cannot be managed or changed by the present political system because the massively corrupt ruling class is using that system to protect itself.
The Federal Reserve is a creature of a ruling class that arrogantly sees every human being as a commodity and pawn in their own games, all meant only to serve the benefit of that ruling class. Its ethics inquiry is pure theater.
The United Nations is urging nations to pay attention to the unfolding economic crisis of Afghanistan, which could hurt the majority of Afghanis under Taliban rule. The world organization is pushing for the country controlled by radical mountain Islamists that are openly engaged in activities commonly characterized by multiple nation-states, and even by the UN, as being terroristic in nature.
America could find it in the unenviable position of funding the same people that were just recently attempting to kill its own soldiers. The reputation of the American state on the world stage, which has already taken several hits recently, most notably in this same Afghanistan, could continue to diminish, leading many of our current ‘allies’ to consider maybe joining factions with stronger, more reliable allies like, perhaps, Russia, or China.
Whether these nation-states prove to be any more reliable than the US or not is not as important as the immediate perception that, compared to America’s last 10 years or so, almost anyone looks better as a source for protection from local threats than the US does right now. I predict the nation-states further outside of the central orbit of America, Australia, and the UK, might very well, at minimum, invite more presence by both Russia and China in a bid to hedge their bets should the US fail them like they did their allies in Afghanistan.
Deborah Lyons, Special Representative of the Secretary General of the United Nations for Afghanistan makes a statement during the 2020 Afghanistan Conference at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland November 24, 2020. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
UNITED NATIONS, Sept 9 (Reuters) – The United Nations warned on Thursday that the freezing of billions of dollars in Afghan assets to keep them out of Taliban hands would inevitably spark “a severe economic downturn” and could push millions more Afghans into poverty and hunger.
U.N. special envoy on Afghanistan, Deborah Lyons, said a way needed to be found to get money quickly flowing to the country “to prevent a total breakdown of the economy and social order” and with safeguards to ensure it is not misused by the Taliban.
Lyons told the U.N. Security Council that Afghanistan could be set “back for generations.”
“The economy must be allowed to breathe for a few more months, giving the Taliban a chance to demonstrate flexibility and a genuine…
A poll of workers of big tech ahs revelead that the majority of them would support efforts by the government to break up their own companies. The chickens have come home to roost.
Big Tech has adopted ideological moral standards that have favored a certain political persuasion, on the most part, what we in this world in current year call ‘the left.’ That group of political thinkers has long had a tradition of being decidedly against mega corpos ruling the markets with monopolistic power.
Big Tech needed people willing to axe people for their beliefs alone, and for that they needed this same group of people, who also overwhelmingly favor censorship of thought as a means of protection against dangerous, non-party-approved thoughts. And now, this crowd of dedicated ‘lefitsts’ willing to axe you for deadnaming a transgender person are now also willing to break up their own company.
With the arrival of U.S. Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan, breaking up Big Tech has reemerged as a major policy discussion in Washington. The issue seems to be bipartisan, with Republicans and Democrats alike in favor of stemming monopolistic behavior in the tech industry. Of course, the situation on the ground is more nuanced.
One month after the House Judiciary Committee voted to advance five bipartisan bills that would force Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Facebook and Google to split up or walk away from core businesses, Republican committee members introduced new legislation to give Americans legal recourse against online censorship by Big Tech companies. The more conservative-driven policy measures also propose greater transparency into content moderation practices by Big Tech.
This sparring between lawmakers on how to regulate Big Tech is not expected to end anytime soon. But as the U.S. ushers in a new era of digital transformation accelerated by the pandemic, Congress stands firmly united in the belief that Big Tech’s power must be checked to preserve the free market.
As it stands now, small competitors and consumers alike have little choice but to be tethered to Big Tech to participate in today’s modern economic engine. And coming out of the pandemic, the five biggest tech giants are growing at breathtaking speed unseen before in the history of capitalism.
Big Tech companies have come out strongly against regulation that would break up their business operations, suggesting reform would result in the loss of research and development, impractical market fragmentation and higher service costs to consumers.
A survey commissioned by a tech industry trade group funded by Big Tech companies such as Apple, Facebook and Amazon suggests that Americans view tech regulation as a low priority for Congress. Among those listed as top priority for Americans were the economy, public health, climate change and infrastructure. The survey also revealed that Americans are…
(AP) – Ten years after the 9/11 attacks, Americans were reasonably positive about the state of their rights and liberties. Today, after 20 years, not as much.
That’s according to a poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research that builds on work conducted in 2011, one decade after the pivotal moment in U.S. history. Some questions were also asked on polls conducted in 2013 and 2015.
Americans were relatively united around the idea that the government did a good job protecting many basic rights a decade after the terrorist attacks, which produced a massive overhaul of the country’s intelligence services and the creation of agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security. Along with those changes came a creeping concern about government overreach, although Americans as a whole remained fairly positive.
Apparently, President Joe Biden had a long talk with Chairman Xi in a call that his team itself would characterize as being about setting the parameters for the new relationship between the US and China Post-Trump and assuring that there were no untintended conflicts because China misinterpreted an action from the US.
This is a call of weakness and begging and, for China, was propaganda gold that was used richly in its media, characterizing the call as a demonstration of the strength of Xi and China contrasted with the weakness of Biden. In his fist talk to Xi in 7 months, he came to him with shield down and sword offered, begging China not to do anything harmful to the US because they might misinterpret American action.
What really happened on this call, well, perhaps we will never know, but by the White House’s own stated goal and ‘accomplishment’ of the call, you cannot help but interpret this as a significant PR win for Xi and a nothingburger for Biden here at home, as this call will get little coverage that reaches rank and file Americans.
From an analyst’s perspective, the signalling from the White House’s own version of this call is that they are prepared to negotiate new terms and they are going in already giving China the starting advantage, most likely, I would surmise, because the DNC corpostate alliance requires they at least TRY to loosen up China’s markets to give our American companies their long-anticipated goal of tapping in to a giant Chinese market.
This weakness on the US is a reflection of the party in power’s dependence on billionaires to enforce and fund their new moral supremacist program for America, one that promises to finally fell the roadblock to central control in America, the Bill of Rights as an assumption of enititled rights by Americans who are willing to use those constructs to justifty opting out of your programs altogether, by any means necessary.
This weakness is only contigent on these companies not finding a viable alternative to China’s market prize, which might very well turn out to be India, a nation-state far more aligned with American individual rights as a concept than China ever could be so long as they follow Socialism with Chinese characteristics. After all, one of the founding principles of our nation, unity and diversity, is also one of the central tenets of India’s civilization since long before the time of Christ.
US President Joe Biden talked with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping for the first time in seven months Thursday, urging they ensure that “competition” between the two powers does not become “conflict,” the White House said.
During the call, Biden‘s message was that the United States wants to ensure “the dynamic remains competitive and that we don’t have any situation in the future where we veer into unintended conflict,” a senior US administration official told reporters.
In Beijing, state broadcaster CCTV reported that the phone call was “candid, in-depth” and covered “extensive strategic communication and exchanges on China-US relations and issues of mutual concern,” and that US policy on China has caused “serious difficulties.”
This was the leaders’ first call since February, when they talked for two hours, shortly after Biden took over from Donald Trump. The Biden administration official said the latest call lasted 90 minutes.
Silicon Valley and the Big Tech that emerged from it are collectively though separately aiming to cut out the financial middle man and start doing banking in their own right to provide the payment gateways for themselves. The move is fascinating to oberseve as the financial institutions have largely been working cooperatively to support the new moral supremacism of Silicon Valley by cutting off offenders of big tech from their bank accounts. Now, Big Tech is thanking banks the only way they know how, by exploiting their weakness and taking over their territory.
Big Tech firms could pose a far bigger challenge to brick-and-mortar lenders than fintech startups that lack the scale of platform businesses
The slow but surefooted strides made by Big Tech firms like Google, Amazon and Facebook into the banking industry might end up dislodging brick-and-mortar lenders in the country.
The tech industry which has been slowly creeping up on licensed deposit taking institutions in India, is all set to disrupt the business of traditional lenders in India, said media reports. Prompting the question whether the traditional brick and mortar Indian banking industry, which is already crippled by rising NPAs and bad loans due to the pandemic, would then meet the fate of dying newspapers in the future?
The Bedford VA hospital in Massachusetts violated federal law by failing to properly search for a missing 62-year-old Army veteran, whose decomposing body wasn’t found until a month after his disappearance in an emergency stairwell just 60 feet from the door of his residential room at the facility.
A new 45-page report released last week by the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General states that the body of Tim White was found on June 12, 2020, by another resident in an emergency exit stairwell at Bedford Veterans Quarters (BVQ), an independent-living facility privately operated by Caritas Communities Inc., an organization that provides services for homeless people.
Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!
Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here
