Christian

PGC – One of the Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky is Rule Number 4, Make the Enemy Live up to its own book of rules.  This tactic has been deployed successfully by Anti-Bill-of-Rights movements such as the very kind the DNC has co-opted in its rise ot near-aboslute, near-one-party power.

The DNC has long held Republicans and conservatives by their own moral standards and has easily found their deficiencies in measuring up to their own moral standards as  found in their rule books, which are usually the Bible and/or The Constitution.

WIth this in  mind, conservatives are attempting to hold the DNC to its own standards, its own rules, this time regarding who should be cancelled, ostracized from society, and why.  After  Human Rights Campaign Director Alphonso David was exposed for allegedly enabling Andrew Cuomo’s sexual assaults by digging up dirt on his accusers and providing them to Cuomo, the conservatives thought they had a Rule 4 moment, to hold the enemy up by his own book law.

But the keyword here is law, something that is independent of human opinion or will, something that never changes and offers stable, predictable patterns for human governance.  However capable of humans are at approaching such an actual state may  be disputed, but when your starting point is that no such constant compass is needed, then Rule number 4 might not have any real power of you.  Furthermore, by attempting to get HRC cancelled, you are perpetuating the legitimacy of the tactics being used by the DNC and its useful beasts such as HRC, corporate cancellation for a violation of moral supremacist assumptions.

The DNC derives its power from ideological constructs that have yet to be codified into any near-universal code, let alone have achieved any body of work that has attained anything  approaching a state of infallibility.  They have no book, only general feels regarding the general claims that they make about the nature of the world and how to fix the evils of the world they promise you is on the verge of killing you if you don’t first kill the killers, anyone outside the DNC orthodoxy, which shifts as the need of the few who control that machine require it to.

Any conservative organization that had a Director who committed such an obvious and egregious violation of the Corpowoketarianz code would surely be elimited from corporate futures if they had committed such an act.  But the act itself is not the law, the law is the decision itself by those who hold power to use it to cut off anyone who doesn’t adhere to the code, which can be selectively enforced and not enforceed based on the positional alignment of the offender to the ones who wield the power to define what an offender is in the first pliace, the priest-king-queens of corpowoketarianizm.

In a sense, corpowoketarianizm produces the same moral frame as Confucionism, in that both end up not producing a moral code outside the power  of the indivudals on top, but upon the consistent application of a moral code by the individuals on top define.  The objective universality is not in the moral code itself, but in how the one with power chooses to enforce the moral code.  For the corpowoketarianz, morality is war menu, one we pull upon to target those that can be targeted who oppose our efforts to remake humans in our images.

The conservatives may think the Corpowoketarianz are being inconsistent in not punishing HRC for the violation of women, but women in this system are only just above men in significance to the apex of society the corpowoketarianz choose to elavate and protect.  Women are elevated over men, but not over homosexuals, or trans, for instance.  As HRC covers both those power bases, the Corpowoketarianz are being consistent, and as their book is the book of power in the hands of the elite, not in any wisdom tradition with code outside the command of the individuals in power, there is no Rule 4 of Alinsky to save the conservatives from the DNC.

So long as conservatives continue to operate in the DNC morality courts, rather than conducting their own, they will always, always, always, always lose, and perhaps, given the dynamic of the state of ‘conservative’ leadership in America today, that’s just by design.

Apple, Coca-Cola, Others Ignore Call to Dissociate from Human Rights Campaign – National Center for Public Policy Research

From nationalcenter.org
2021-08-16 17:00:07

Excerpt:

HRC Should Lose Corporate Support After Belittling Cuomo Accuser And Attempting To Destroy Women’s Sports And Religious Liberties, Says Free Enterprise Project

Washington, D.C. – Apple, American Airlines, Coca-Cola, Pfizer and Target failed to justify their continuing “platinum partner” support for the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) after the Free Enterprise Project (FEP) brought to their attention how HRC has opposed sexual-assault victims, girls’ and women’s sports and religious liberties.

Scott Shepard, who serves as FEP director at the National Center for Public Policy Research, sent a letter to the CEOs of each of these companies last Monday detailing these accusations and explaining the dangers associated with HRC’s use of the companies’ brands in light of these controversies.

Read Full Article

PGC – Corpo-Woketarianizm is riding into power under the rainbow flag, billing itself as the champion for the cause of the generationally-oppressed homosexual.  The suffering is real and the stigmatiztion of homsexuality and non-heterosexual expressions is a continuing issue for folks that are parts of these communities.  Corpo-woketarianz offer this group a  mix of revenge and utopion justice through a process of assuring that not one human is left viable in our society that dares believe homosexuality is anything but stunning and brave, and something to be celebrated over almost everything else you could posibly imagine.

I saw this coming from far awar, from years away, and, for years, I chose not to attack so directly this corpo-woketarianizm as it began to emerge.  I chose to be silent for fear of enabling what backlash might come should I fight against the improper, unjust use the real suffering of real people to coercive others and break down standards that protect all those in disadvantage from those in advantage, mainly and specifically the standards we find in our American Bill of Rights.

The Corpo-Woketarianz are telling the non-heterosexual-exclusive communities that their family and friends and neighbors are all potentially expendable if they hope to live in Corpowoketarianztopiaz.  Speaking out against them does, in fact, or at least in part, embolden actual bigots, actual racists, actual oppressors who used a lot of very recent subhumanizing contstructs to eliminate vast swathes of people from consideration on par with being a fellow human like themselves.

Case in point might be seen in Ghana, who sees the aggressive use of “Gay Rights” by Copowoketarianz Inc all around them, and they react by trying to shut out the gays, legislate away the gays, subhumanize them once again, and assure they stay there.  This is a natural reaction to a perceived, now not entirely unjustified perception, threat from within if they ’embolden’ this community.

The community, my friends, is not the issue, nor is sexuality itself.  Homsexuality, bisexuality, let the humans sort that openly in consensual frames, then all of the arguments might be put to rest and we will see what a people within the whole people of human (of which we all belong) can do if given the space to simply be fellow humans with the rest of humanity.

While coercive acceptance is never acceptable, nor is social shunning of non-acceptance, coervive non-acceptance is not acceptable within our Bill of Rights frame.  We humans, as we come to understand more and more who we are in all our variations, must, within a pluralistic democratic republic limited by a Bill of Rights based constitution, assure that our variations are given civil, public space, in comerce and trade, in government, full access to a society and full and equal standing with the whole of society.

So long as your beliefs, your habits of being do not directly threaten to coerce others who have not first attempted to directly coerce you, then a pluralistic land must assure that variations be given their open space to become what they might become without social vilification and state limitation.  While it is easy to understand where the powers that be in Ghana might be tempted to put thousands of lives at risk of significant destabiliaztion and trauma, this is not of the spirit of justice in a land of liberty.

This countervaling ‘baclash’ is one I fear here in America, and as a loved one and friend of multiple people that fall outside the category of heterosexual-exclusive, my love for them and my fear for their potential well-being leads me away from such draconian reactions to a very real threat, the use of the cause of the homosexual, or any other disenfranchised group, as a powderkeg built on promises of revenge and utopian deliverance, all to turn into distopian infighting over the scraps you still hold, if you end up on top in the end at all.

The dynamic of multiple sexual dimensions in human society is a process we have yet to fully understand, and we never will if we don’t give equal space to those that fit outside the orthodox frames.  But it is a process that must begin on equal footing, and a process that limits its actions to respect to the bills of rights of all.  It’s a messier process, but one that will produce genuine shifts in human understanding, not aped behavior that papers over simmering hate waiting to explode should the shackles come off.

That last path is the one the Corpowoketarianz are leading us down, but we need not respond by heading down the path to Ghana.  In a lot of ways, we won’t, if we wish to preserve an American democratic republic limited by a Bill of Rights Based Constitution that enables our true diversity to co-exist peacefully and prosperously despite all our myriad of differences.

The greatest beacon Americans can hold right now is the beacon of the Bill of Rights, but you must hold it and honor it for all, no matter their belief or political persuasion.  If the least  of us is not free, the best of us is a slave owner of the rest of us.

UN experts say Ghana anti-LGBTQI draft bill is ‘recipe for violence’

From www.ghanabusinessnews.com
2021-08-12 06:17:34

Excerpt:

United Nations human rights experts have called on the Ghanaian government to reject the proposed ‘family values’ bill currently before Parliament because it seeks to establish a system of State-sponsored discrimination and violence against the LGBTQI community. The first reading of the bill was done on August 2, 2021. Consideration of the bill is expected to be done in October 2021.

In a press release copied to ghanabusinessnews.com, the independent experts, appointed by the Human Rights Council, presented an analysis of the draft bill to the Ghana government, concluding that adopting the legislation in its current or any partial form would be tantamount to a violation of a number of human rights standards, including the absolute prohibition of torture.

The experts describe the draft legislation which argues that any person who deviates from an arbitrary standard of sexual orientation or gender identity is immediately to be considered dangerous, sick or anti-social, as a textbook example of discrimination.

“The proposed law promotes deeply harmful practices that amount to ill-treatment and are conducive to torture, such as so-called ‘conversion therapy’ and other heinous violations like unneces

 

Read Full Article

PGC – Marriages in England and Wales are on the decline, specifically heterosexual marriages.  The rate goes significantly lower when one factors in marriages that had a religious ceremony attached to it.

We now have a case study in the “West” to see what happens to societes who lack a traditional marriage a, by extension, family structure.  This is not a case of different forms of marriage co-existing with traditional heterosexual marriage, this is a case of heterosexual marriage becoming something of an endangered species, and thus no longer a primary driver of institutional forming in society.  What happens when you remove that equation from a complex civilization that has the power of artificial intelligence and drones that kill  autonomously at its disposal?

If we are right about the stabilizing factoring of fathers and mothers raising children, then a society without such social constructs, we suspect, will become increasingly sexualized at increasingly lower ages as the authority of parenting itself becomes questioned, and finally hardly considered.  The state itself will decide the potential options for the child, and will make sure the child has been fooled into believing whatever moral construct it wishes to create to justifty the coercion it requires to continue to protect its own lies.

Homosexual marriage and family can co-exist with heterosexual marriage and family, but society cannot long survive where heterosexual marriage is to become vilified, as it appears to have already taken place in England and Wales.  Now we watch as their world becomes the proof of life of a variety of competing theories regarding the soundness of seeking to destroy traditional marriage and family constructs.

From www.christiantoday.com
2021-08-11 16:38:50

Excerpt:

The number of heterosexual couples getting married in England and Wales and those opting for a religious ceremony have fallen to their lowest levels on record.

Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that there were 234,795 marriages in England and Wales in 2018, down 3.3% on the year before and the lowest since 2009.

Marriage rates for opposite-sex couples in 2018 were the lowest on record, with 20.1 marriages per 1,000 unmarried men and 18.6 per 1,000 unmarried women……

Figures also suggest fewer people are opting for the traditional church wedding, with only around a fifth (21.1%) of heterosexual couples in 2018 choosing a religious ceremony – the lowest on record….

“The divorce rate is at its lowest level in 30 years, suggesting those who get married are much more likely to stick together and marriage remains the most stable form of relationship, especially when you factor in children.”

Read Full Article

PGC – Microsost and Twitter are paying independent coders bounties to destroy problematic bugs in their ai networks.  They are also paying them to figure out ways to assure that their ai algorithms don’t create the very biases these companies are hard-pressed to assure is not propelled.

The hope is to develop algorithms that guarantee the values of the monopolistic companies are reflected as being the objectively superior moral constructs to build our societies around.  The problem is many of their suppositions about the truth of this overwhelmingly popular assumption regarding the nature of what is or is not accepted moral supremacist paramters gets broken when it comes to the algorithms that are left to emerge from actual human use instead of being pre-programmed to assure outcomes that favored a specific moral supremacist parameter.

One doubts their chances in creating a world in their image that will not require greater and greater levels of coercion to keep the countering data concealed that perhaps their positions are not as sure and as clean as pure and as good as they imagine they are.  To some degree, that’s what the AI has been telling you, you can’t control the preferences of a people, you can only coerce them in having to accept the limitation of their preferential being for fear of not having the capacity to live at all.

One suspects their hopes at creating the perfect AI filters is an illusory goal, and you will  one day learn the futility of governance fundamentally through non-human decision-making, which is what these massive techno-corpo-states hope to create, a virtual zoo wherein the human made in their image can theoretically thrive, governed with minimal human expense and thus human opportinuty.

Why Microsoft and Twitter are turning to bug bounties to fix their A.I.

From fortune.com
2021-08-10 14:32:06
Jonathan Vanian
Excerpt:

Now, tech companies like Microsoft, Nvidia, and Twitter are hosting bug bounty programs specifically for artificial intelligence. The goal is for outsiders to spot flaws in A.I. software so that companies can improve the technology and reduce the risk of machine learning discriminating against certain groups of people.

For example, last week, Microsoft and Nvidia detailed a new bug bounty program during the annual Defcon hacker conference. The companies plan to reward hackers who manage to alter computer viruses so that they go undetected by some of Microsoft’s A.I.-powered malware-detection services. Hackers who can create scammy emails that evade Microsoft’s machine-learning powered email phishing detection software will also earn some money in the form of Microsoft gift cards and other prizes.

Read Full Article

PGC – The Chinese Communist Party is positioning itself to be the leading light of the world, the moral city on the hill that will grace all other nations with the benefits of socialism with Chinese characteristics.  As such, it has to appear to be somewhat trustworthy, reliable, accountable, in positioning itself to be the new judge of the world.

This means it’s going to have to sanitize its internal brutality, through secrecy, and through managing a narrative within your allowable frames, which is what China has done by making moves that appear to be more ‘tolerant’ of other religions outside of the religion of Chairman Xi.

What China is really doing is forming some highly stripped down skeletons of some forms of religion, such as Christianity or Islam, but ones that ultimately give all authority, sovereignty, and final moral judgment to the party, and when the party is one man, such as it is right now, then to one man.

Chinese State Christianity recognizes the self-sacrificing aspect of Christ but none of His moral authority, for He is ultimately a shadow of the true faith in the end, and Chinese State Christians view a version of Super Chinese Socialist Christ as a model to become in service to the state, not God.

After decades of restricting religion, the Chinese Communist Party is carefully allowing its revival

From scroll.in
2021-08-09 14:00:00

Excerpt:

 

The Chinese Communist Party is celebrating the 100th anniversary of its founding in 1921. For most of those decades, the party sought to restrict or obliterate traditional religious practices, which it considered part of China’s “feudal” past.

But since the late 1970s, the party has slowly permitted a multifaceted and far-reaching revival of religion in China to take place. More recently, current Chinese president and Communist Party leader Xi Jinping has endorsed continued party tolerance for religion as filling a moral void that has developed amid China’s fast-paced economic growth.

This support does come with caveats and restrictions, however, including the demand that religious leaders support the Communist Party.

 

Read Full Article