April 23, 2026

W R Collier Jr

Lack Of Firefighting Aircraft Due To Obama- William Raymond Collier

President Obama’s administration used complicated and what some see as overly strict regulations to ground a fleet of 6 critical firefighting aircraft, including a Boeing 747.

In September of past year the Forestry Service cancelled a contract on ground many see as spurious. This is the original press release…. Forestry Service Cancells Contract

At the same time, the Air Force’s budget was cut resulting in a total availability of 8 Air Force C-130’s, four of which are engaged in Colorado.

The inability of officials to contain these fast-moving fires is directly related to the arbitrary cancellation of this contract back in September. Those 6 aircraft, if availale now, would more than double the airborne firefighting capability of Colorado firefighters. It is probable that these fires would have been contained if those aircraft had been available right now.

In addition to the lost aircraft, the Obama administration has been slow to meet the needs of maintaing the fire fighting aircraft left intact after this arbitrary cut.

 

Here is the press release itself:

US Forest Service Cancels Airtanker Contract with Aero Union California company did not meet agency’s safety standards

WASHINGTON, July 29, 2011–The U.S. Forest Service announced today that it has terminated its contract with Aero Union of Sacramento, Calif., because the company failed to meet its contractual obligations. The company was providing six airtankers under exclusive-use contracts to the Forest Service.                              “Our main priority is protecting and saving lives, and we can’t in good conscience maintain an aviation contract where we feel lives may be put at risk due to inadequate safety practices” said Tom Harbour, director of the Forest Service’s Fire and Aviation Management program. “This contract termination notwithstanding, we possess the aircraft support needed for this year’s fire season.”                              The Forest Service has access to additional aviation assets to meet operational needs. Two other private companies provide 11 large airtankers under exclusive-use contracts. In addition, there are two very large airtankers available through a “call when needed” contract, as well as eight military firefighting aircraft.

The five-year contract the Forest Service signed with Aero Union in 2008 required participation in a continued airworthiness program, which included a Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Evaluation and structural inspection program. In April 2011, Aero Union informed the Forest Service that the Federal Aviation Administration found the company was not in compliance with its mandated structural inspection program requirements.

Because of the extraordinary stresses placed on aircraft during aerial firefighting and to prevent catastrophic failures and ensure safety, the Forest Service adds requirements to its airtanker contracts that are specific to the agency’s firefighting mission. The Forest Service will not use aircraft that do not meet its requirements.

The mission of the USDA Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. The Agency manages 193 million acres of public land, provides assistance to State and private landowners, and maintains the largest forestry research organization in the world.

____________________________________________________________________

Here is an excerpt from an article by Michelle Malkin detailing the Obama admin’s mishandling of the firefighting aircraft:

Michelle Malkin » How Obama Bureaucrats Fueled Western Wildfires

Jun 19, 2012 by Michelle Malkin
So, no shovel-ready planes? Actually, there are: On June 20th, 2012 at 1:50 am, mcridge said: Michelle, Another option that the U.S. Forest Service is ignoring is the Evergreen Aviation Supertanker Service. This is a huge 747 ….. Odd that you ignore that the older smaller federally owned planes were replaced with newer larger fire fighting aircraft (per Bush) now operated by the military and how many private fire fighter aircraft as well as if you might notice fixed wing

More results from Michelle Malkin

This story shows how the fire fighters had to wait for aircraft to arrive, aircraft that could have been there but for Obama’s cutting of the ones that were already there-

Two specially equipped Air Force C-130 cargo planes were helping fight the fire, and a third was expected later in the day.

With the nation’s privately owned fleet of heavy air tankers already in use or unavailable, U.S. Forest Chief Tom Tidwell said his agency had to call on the military to help.

Tidwell told The Associated Press in a phone interview Monday that about half of the nation’s personnel who are usually assigned to large fires are working in Colorado right now.

from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/26/colorado-wildfires-2012-r_n_1626919.html

Obama To Stump In Colorado?-  William Raymond Collier

In a stunning display of hubris and political synicism President Obama is likely to show up in Colarado tomorrow or Friday at the latest.

During his appearance, The Freedomist has learned, Obama plans to talk about how the GOP is “distracting” America from “real problems” like the fires in Colorado with their “endless investigation” into Fast and Furious.

If the Supreme Court rules goes against him, Obama will also denounce Republican efforts to “cut programs” like “the kind of programs that fund emergency services.”

Obama will not name the GOP and will attempt to include these remarks as obliquely as possible so that his media allies can provide cover and accuse those who see the partisan tone of “nitpicking.”

“The whole thing”, according to what we have learned, “is designed to make it look and feel like it is objectively true that the GOP and their Supreme Court appointees are being unreasonable and partisan….to make the GOP look ‘unfair’ to independent voters especially.”

The effort is being rushed and officials are scrambling to get security arrangements in place because of the short notice.

 

In a Democratic primary in Brooklyn a well known local leader could win in a primary: the problem is that he literally “hates the Jews”. It’s decidedly hard to get Jewish voters to vote for your party in an election when the party rank and file support a Jew hater. From Israel National News- NY Dems May Be Exposed For Being Jew Haters American Jews are usually for the Democrats, mostly because Rooseevelt in World War Two resisted Republican isolationaism and fought the Nazis. Of course these same Jews have no idea how little real respects Progressives have for Jews, especially Israeli Jews.

 

Homeland Security Refuses To Follow Federal Law

William R Collier Jr

The feds are basically having a fit over the Supreme Court’s decision to let the states report on illegal immigrants. They revoked their agreements with 5 cities in Arizona and have decided to refuse to answer calls when an illegal alien is reported. This might appeal to some Hispanic voters who somehow think being Hispanic means you MUST be for amnesty for illegals, so much so that anyone who promises that gets their vote (even if they support killing the unborn or condoning new forms of “marriage” that reduce the value of marriage in society…even as Hispanics are seeing a LOSS in economic standing under Progressive policies). http://www.newsmax.com/m/Article/S00

This is lawlessness on steroids, but nobody seems to care enough to do somthing about it, so one can guess that it will only get worse. The problem is that the illegal immigration problem is not that simple. Who wouldn’t want to escape places of corruption and oppression, but why do those same people, who flee progressive tyranny, elect progressives in America once they get the vote?

Here is the rub: even people who feel compassion for illegals, like myself, see through the smoke and mirrors to see how the Progressives are busy marginalizing and isolating more and more Hispanics and brainwashing them with bogeyman stories about how everyone who isn’t a Progressive hates them. So, even if we might want to have compassion we have to ask: do we need 12 million more people stuck on the Progressive slave plantation. The refusal to enforce the law while catering to the myth that all non-Progressives are somehow “racists” is un-American.

 

Progressives tried to use “murder by cop” to silence and opponent to their freedom-taking agenda. It’s called “SWATtin” and the objective is to get an opponent killed by the police, that’s really the bottom line. To see how they do it, and why, go here — From Publius Forum- Aaron Worthing Wins Blow for Free Speech, Then Gets SWATed « Publius Forum/

The Progressive Politocracy is out of control and no blogger who opposes them is “off limits”, in fact there are no boundaries they are not willing to crash through to silence their oppponents. This is the nature of a man-made ideology that depends on the State to solve every problem. Christians rely on God to makes things right, therefore they can afford to forego trying to force people to think or act the way they want them to.

Progressives, despite their claim of religious affiliation, are godless freedom-takers who think the state is the source of life and the solver of every problem. For them it is not “immoral” to use the police to kill their opponents by making fake 911 calls- it’s just another example of the Progressive instinct to use the state to solve their problems. Legal actions are not being organized because, 1, we don’t know WHO is behind this other than Progressives and, 2, the authorities (like the Attorney General) are too busy fighting the People to protect their rights. This is what happens when Progressives are in power.

 

UPDATES will be added as new rulings are announced, especially the Obamacare ruling, expected this week….

In the Arizona Immigration Law case, the Supreme Court upheld the key provision of the law, requiring police officers to check a suspect’s immigration status, but overturned provisions directed at people giving rides, jobs, or housing to “illegals”.

The Supreme Court ruled that under the 8th amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, juveniles could not be sentenced to death or life in prison without parole.

In election law, the Supreme Court ruled that there could be no spending limits imposed on corporations during political campaigns, all but making the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act a dead letter.

 

Today the Supreme Court ruled on the Airzona Immigration Law, striking down three of the four key provisions, but they upheld the strongest part of the law, giving Obama a legal loss in the week they are expected to rule on Obamacare’s legality according to the Constitution. The key provision, requiring police officers to identify the immigration status of persons they choose to apprehend.

Other provisions that were struck down were worrisome because they targeted emplyers and renters who provided employment or services to illegal immigrants. Many felt that this was problematic because the law was broad enough to include someone giving somebody a ride or just having some maintenance work done for a few hours.

The key provision upheld gives local law enforcement the power to check people’s immigration status. Opponents worry that “anybody who looks Hispanic” will face extra scrutiny and, while they may in fact be a citizen, they might not have their ID on them.

Proponents argue that illegal immigration is “out of control” and some means of identifying those persons who are not legally here MUST be provided for, and if the Feds won’d do it, proponents say, “the states MUST.”

William Raymond Collier

 

 

Bill Collier– Color me dumbstruck, but our self-absorbed head of state has somehow decided that he has a right to everything, even your wedding gifts. Talk about a fauxe pas! It’s like asking a girl on a date at a funeral, not strictly illegal, but major creepy! Desparate for money, apparently (there HAS to be a reason for such, well, creepiness), the campaign of FORWARD! (Hope And Change have hopelessly changed to this old-line socialist slogan) has begun asking its most fanatical followers to ask the people coming to their wedding to forego the gifts they might need to get started in life and give money to Obama instead. This demeaning of the nuptials shouldn’t surprise anyone, Obama has already sold out on the kind of marriage human civilization has embraced for over 6,000 years to include guys with guys, girls with girls, and, who knows, multiples with multiples…people with furniture! So that’s the deal, laid bare like a man who mistakenly tries to get a shower in the girl’s locker room…Obama wants our ALL, and it’s just creepy!

Read more at- http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/22/Obama-wedding-registry

More Obama 2012 Marketing Ideas sure to win:

1.  When a loved one dies, tell their friends and family to donate to the Obama 2012 Rememberence Fund- A Socialist Presidency lasts far longer than Roses!

2. Obama 2012 Organ Auction-  Don’t just put yourself down as an organ donor on your drivers licence when you can save a life and a President!  Sign up for the Obama 2012 Organ Auction Fund and your organs will be sold on the black market, with proceeds to go to the re-election of your King..er..President

3.  Ride with Obama in 2012- Is your child graduating from high school and you promised them a new car?  Well, why send your child off with wheels when they can RIDE WITH OBAMA in 2012!  The new ride with Obama fund allows your child to actually see a live feed of President Obama or one of his campaign workers actually using your child’s money to fill up the tank of one of President Obama’s buses as he tours the country demanding…er….asking for votes.  It will be like your child is riding along with the King himself!  Now won’t that memory last longer than a silly new car for graduation?

4.  Obama 2012 Food Drive-  You spend hundreds of dollars a week buying food that is just going to leave your body soon anyway and take up toxic space on the planet.  Why eat when you can contribute your grocery dollars to the Obama 2012 Food Drive, where we are making the Food that will feed America, food that will fundamentally transform us from fat, free pigs to thin, worry-free Obama workers!

5.  Obama Family 2012-  Getting ready for your family from around the country to buy plane tickets, bus tickets, train tickets to go to your annual family reunion?  Why spend all that money building memories with your family when you can build security with the Obama Family?  Tell your family to spend the money they WOULD have spent travelling to your family reunion on the Obama Family.  After all, isn’t an Obama Presidency worth more than spending time with your family?

 

Thief Robs Bricks From Allison Hill Community Ministry in Harrisburg PA
Thief Robs Bricks From Allison Hill Community Ministry in Harrisburg PA (15th and Derry). The reader who submitted the photos sent an email to Alicia Richardson of ABC 27 News in Harrisburg, who is said to be looking into the incident.

From a SOURCE who HAS PICTURES-

This man is taking bricks from the private property that is leased by the Derry Street church for a community garden to help the neighborhood.

The city tore down a building and was asked to leave a pile of bricks there for the Church to build with.   They piled up a very large pile with their machines and put it on the church property.

When this man pulled up our source told him the bricks belonged to the Church but he did not care.   He kept taking them and putting them on the flat bed connected to his truck.  When our source called the Church and took the phone over to the man, he continued to steal the bricks, ignoring our source and the phone.  Brother Bill came down from the Church and told him he was on private property but that did not sway him…

He kept loading his flatbed trailer behind his truck and hid his license plate.  Brother Bill call the police but they didn’t come for the Church.   he man told our source she did not know who she was messing with when she confronted him about stealing bricks from the church property.

We could be wrong but it seems strange the Harrisburg Police didn’t come for the Church…

 

Thief steals bricks from a Harriburg PA church
This man accused our source of “harassing” him and said they were “breaking the law” by photographing him. This kind of arrogant disregard for the law and decency should be punished!According to the source, who’s ID is being protected, the man almost dared her to stop him and, though the source called the police, there was no police response.

The pile of bricks was about 4 1/2 feet wide and 20 feet long but after the thief stole the church’s bricks, the pile was maybe a foot high and 5 feet long. The man CLAIMED that “the cops know me, they won’t come”  Is this true, do the Harrisburg Pa Police KNOW this man and are THEY protecting him?

 

 

A Freedomist Perspective On The 2012 Election- By Bill Collier- The 2012 election is about unlimited government, as envisioned by the ideology of socialism. Socialism is a broad term: in its strictest application socialism is the total abolition of private property and the imposition of a planned economy with the state being the sole economic authority.

Not all socialists, however, are for this brand of socialism, at least initially. There are protosocialists who want to move towards socialism in small increments. There are neo-socialists who seek socialist goals but who are willing to rely on indirect government control, via taxes and wealth redistribution, over private property which they concede or allow to maintain an existence on paper only.

Socialism is achieved when all or most economic decisions are at least regulated by a central government. Such socialism might be neosocialism, protosocialism, or full-blown socialism: but one thing it isn’t is a truly free market.

The fundamental weakness of a free market program isn’t its program but its presentation. Socialism’s appeal is the promise that people can be guaranteed a level of wellness regardless of their ability, work ethic, or circumstances: this promise cannot ever be fulfilled but time and time again voters are fooled by it. The counter-claim by a free market advocate, that socialism will impoverish the nation while everyone under a free market CAN prosper just doesn’t sound appealing to someone who, frankly, might not want to do the work or take the risks required!

Long before we debate on the merits of charity towards the poor and needy, we need to establish a framework of understanding about the role, and authority, of government, or the state. It would be reasonable to say that there must be some kind of limits to the role and authority of the state, to say otherwise is only to invite trouble, because a state without limits is tyranny waiting to happen.

There is an argument I have heard that goes like this- if you like the fire department, social security, Medicaid/Medicare, and public schools then you have no right to argue that something like Obamacare is socialism. The logic they use in making this argument is that if Obamacare is socialism, then so are these other things, and if you don’t have a problem with these things, then you shouldn’t have a problem with Obamacare.

It is ironic, is it not, that the opponents of many of these programs actually said at the time words to the effect that these programs were “creeping socialism” and that they would be used to excuse full-fledged socialism at some later date. If you insist that these programs are a form of socialism, it is  obvious that Americans have decided that they can tolerate a “little” socialism. The promise that was made when these programs were passed was that they would NOT lead to unlimited government, but now the argument is that if we accept PART of the socialist program then we MUST accept total socialism.

I would argue that NONE of these programs is worth keeping in a healthy and free society, although I am decidedly in the minority. The point is that Americans have accepted a partial socialism, this does not mean that they have to accept total socialism, which, by its nature, results in an unlimited, versus a limited, government.

There is no question that we, as a society, can and should care for those who lack, those who suffer, and those who cannot care for themselves. To say that everyone who is poor is poor merely because they don’t work hard is to ignore real prejudice, exploitation, and injustice that are at least as much of a factor as upbringing, environment, or sheer laziness. The real question is what price must we all pay to achieve this end- must we accept unlimited government and full-fledged socialism as a price for caring for the poor and needy? Must we all become like serfs on the government plantation all to help people who are impoverished and exploited?

It is better to be free and suffer, and be poor, than to have all your base animal needs, and lusts, satisfied at the expense of losing your freedom and, thereby, your dignity as a human being.

In 2012 America will be asked to decide (as we are every election) whether we will hear the siren call of utopian promises at the expense of our freedom or whether we will bear our own burdens (while helping others who need our help) without giving up one shred of our freedom.

 

 

 

Main

Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!

Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here