Bill Collier

Why Did The US Lose The War On Terror?

Bill Collier August 4, 2021

Bill Collier- The objective of the Islamic terror organizations that waged war on America from its inception, culminating in the 9-11 attacks on New York and DC, was to weaken the US and install Islamist regimes in as many places as possible. The effort to lure in the US to a ground fight on the home turf of the Islamists and bleed that country into weakness and retreat.

Meanwhile, the fear lest in fighting the terrorists we ourselves become intolerant has also led to a paradoxically more friendly and accepted, even protected, status for Islam in the US which has allowed for the ease of recruiting Americans themselves into the ranks of radical Islamism.

While the “war on terror” has spanned the globe and has turned its prying gaze inward toward innocent Americans, thanks to the misnamed “Patriot Act”, in no places was it more violent and concentrated than Iraq and Afghanistan. In these two lands, tens of thousands of US troops came to grips with the enemy and found him to be tough, merciless, and smart. The trauma experienced by hundreds of thousands of young Americans has left a massive scar on more than one generations: 20 years of constant war have meant that the children of the first soldiers who started this war were equally traumatized by it.

The enemy isn’t and wasn’t a tactic of lateral warfare, it was and remains an ideology and those who promote it, a form of imperialistic, totalitarian, and cultish Islam whose goal is world destruction in uhersing in the end of the age. Whether the particular brand is Shia, as from Iran, or Sunni, as from Afghanistan, the common belief is that the state should control the population in a totalitarian manner to produce loyal and faithful Muslims while rooting out any unfaithful persons and punishing them or killing them.

The even deeper root of the core ideology is totalitarian control by the state in service of the ideas and beliefs of the rulers. The fellow travelers of this enemy include right and left wing ideologues, ranging from the right-wing Putin to the left-wing Chinese Communist Party, and in the US includes some leading Democrats and far right antisemites. Totalitarians have a certain solidarity against those who reject totalitarianism on principle and without compromise.

The “war on terror” became an authoritarian overstep both at home and abroad by a government that was becoming increasingly corrupted by parochial self-interest, moral depravity, and greed. The lust for power and control, almost sexual in its feeling, began to infect rank and file and topmost political and corporate leaders who, through the Patriot Act, were less and less accountable to anyone but their own whims. The US became an authoritarian and abusive occupation force whose reign was as abusive to average people as the Islamic totalitarians they had temporarily displaced.

A recent initiative announced by the Biden Administration against “domestic terrorism” seems to see US forces coming home even as all the powers of the Patriot Act which were focused on Islamic terror are focused on opponents, whether of the left or right, of the Democratic Party. The war on terror has been lost and is now morphing into a war on freedom in the name of a new war on “domestic terrorism.”

The loss of this war is seen in the precipitous withdrawal of the US from the heartlands of Islamic Totalitariamism, leaving the field to the likes of the Taliban and Iran. While the Freedomist has never supported this foreign adventurism, the manner of the withdrawal exposes the true depth of the defeat. Put simply, the fields of battle are now left to the Islamic totalitarians whom the US tried to defeat.

With all our military might and modern technology, the US was unable to subdue the enemy or win the population over to a more enlightened way. Small cells and bands of under-armed and untrained irregular forces bled out the US and its allies through a thousand cuts every day. Every “battle” saw the enemy leave the field, but the real strategy wasn’t to occupy lands the US could not enter, the enemy became like water, flowing away from strong force pouring into the surrounding population, who remained sympathetic to them and hostile to the Americans.

The count of dead was not like other wars, mostly because of advances is battlefield medicine. But the toll on the psychology of the troops in these far-flung fields became ever more immense. The cost of materials and supplies, and of “nation building” efforts, has accounted for almost $4 trillion dollars. This comes out to around $12,200 for every single human being living in the United States.

The enemy did not have overt support from major powers, like the Viet Cong did in our last lost war. True, some powers did back the enemy, sporadically, and Iran certainly did all it could, but if the US had wanted to punish these powers, it could have without too much risk to itself.

The constant fighting in essentially hit and run ambushes with plenty of IED’s and terrorist attacks kept US forces on constant guard, a psychological burden few can endure without lasting effects, and it caused many injuries and deaths.

The enemy won on three fronts:

1. Radical Islamic ideology is protected and promoted in the US itself and the overall atmosphere for Islamic recruitment in the US is far more favorable than it has ever been

2. US forces have left the field to the enemy who is now re-occupying ground and gainig global recognition for having defeated “the great satan”

3. The “war on terror” has turned inward and now the enemy of the Islamic totalitarians is itself being torn apart by the growing totalitarianism of its ruling class

After 20 years, the US has lost the war on terror. Totalitarian Islamic ideology is on the march abroad, free to recruit within the US, and content in the knowledge Americans are now the target of the “Patriot Act”, not them!

We lost this war as soon as we decided to wage war on a tactic, liberate people who didn’t want to liberate themselves, and resort to the same kinds of totalitarian methods as our enemies.

Anger At Sociopaths In Power Fuels Growing Militancy, But Is Our Union In Peril?

Bill Collier August 3, 2021

Will the anger over the authoritarian responses from sociopaths in power threaten to destroy our country and turn us into Bosnia 2.0?

The fact YouGov did a survey of over 1700 voters and found 47% of Republicans believe force may be needed to prevent the left from destroying the American way of life is no doubt being used by the authoritarian left to further promote the narrative their political opponents are rebels and insurrectionists who should be outlawed. But this over-reactionn only “proves” that those who would foment upheaval are “justified” and “right” in their claims.

We have to ask, will this backlash against the authoritarian left and their woke corporate neocommunist totalitarianism, and the left’s over reaction, destroy our country as we plunge into violence against each other? And, if so, who and what it to blame?

We have been predicting that the deliberate and irrational efforts by authoritarians, mostly on the left, to delegitimize and demonize their opponents, painting them as racists or nazis and other epithets, would eventually push some over the edge, leading to militancy and instability. The targets of the freedom takers clearly feel that their options for peaceful redress are narrowing.

Donald Trump, conspiracy theories, misinformation, fake news, and all that are, regardless of other claims, merely symptoms of something which has as its cause the sociopathic behavior of the authoritarian left. Their conduct wherever they have power, in places like the schools and universities and the state of California, is grossly anti-American and totalitarian, frankly, to an extreme that is beginning to look like the corporatized modern version of a neosoviet dictatorship. The woke cancel culture with its opaque rules that are unevenly applied and always only to help Democrats win power by legerdemain and chicanery is a mass sociopathic hypnosis of useful idiots who becomes the drone warriors of an insidious revolution against freedom and basic humanity.

Even if and when we raise questions about some rather outlandish claims on the right, we are aware that the spread of such claims is just a sign of a deeper problem that isn’t the fault of the claims makers. That problem is the sociopathy of the left, whose leaders and whose radical base are every day assaulting faith, family, and freedom, in that order, and whose only alternative offering is a future neosoviet inperium made up of an alt-gendered, undifferentiated mass controlled from the top through monopoly corporations and power mad bureaucrats.

Democrats live in a bubble and while all sides tend to do this, it is far worse for Democrats who rarely if ever even countenance any perspective other than their own. Nobody in power challenges them. And so they act like their opponents have no say, no legitimate right to respond, and also as if their actions cannot ever get a response of any mean from their opponents.

Quite simply, Democrats today imagine they can pass laws, corporate policies, community standards on monopoly platforms, or regulations and enact curriculum standards that all happen in a void and cannot be responded to by anyone who disagrees. Disagreement is treason to these people. Anyone who isn’t totally down with their revolution is an outlaw. They are, at present, as great a threat to humanity itself as any other major threat in our history as a species. Their outlandish totalitarian ideas and their destruction of faith, family, and freedom, in that order, would potentially lead to the collapse of human civilization itself.

There isn’t a “problem” Democrats don’t want to “solve” through dictatorial control over others and the transfer of wealth from the wealth producing workers to people who don’t earn it, starting with the billionaires who own the Democratic Party. This constant, knee-jerk totalitarian response to real, over-inflated, and imagined problems has begun to wear thin on people whose true north is to be found in a love for faith, family, and freedom as defined in the Judeo-Christian heritage of our country, a heritage being maligned and demonized by public schools which are run by totalitarian loons.

If, however, things spiral out of control, one can imagine armies, from multiple “sides”, tearing out the heart and soul of this land until our cities lie in ruins. This possibly has not been closer since the 1850s but it was foreseen by us way back in the 1980s as the sociocultural and political situation in this country had devolved.

Even if we disagree with and disavow such talk of or affection for the use of force to rectify these injustices by the authoritarian left, we are not surprised that their violations of human rights and human dignity and their war against human flourishing are fertile ground for such a backlash of anger. But backlashes of anger rarely produce solutions that are beneficial to most everyone most of the time, they can actually lear to a different kind of authoritarianism from the other side.

Indeed, the entire genesis of leftwing authoritarianism may be found in the previous century’s more rightwing versions of authoritarianism in which some of the actual social injustices, like racism and discrimination, became fertile ground for an equally authoritarian backlash from the left.

The Judeo-Christian heritage of this country is, we propose, sound and worthy of being upheld and advanced as a voluntary basis of our shared identity as a nation, to wit being an “American” by “ethnicity” is all about these values and convictions. This doesn’t mean other American citizens who don’t embrace this aren’t “Americans” of equal value, but the idea is that if “American” by ethnicity is defined on this basis, less than half of all US citizens are “sociocultural Americans” by spiritual disposition.

But the history of these United States is riddled with practices, policies, and events that positively betrayed our Judeo-Christian heritage, namely by not resognizing and respecting the inherent dignity and rights of every human being and by not focusing intentionally on the universal flourishing of our entire population and every single community and family in this land.

The consequences of our hypocrisy are that the authoritarian left has a cause and excuse not merely to demand fidelity to our historic moral orthodoxy as a free country of sovereign and independence persons but to accuse the very ideas we have collectively violated as being the root cause of actual social injustice. Where we may say certain places and population groups have experienced injustice because we failed to live out our Judeo-Christian worldview, the authoritarian left say that our Judeo-Christian heritage IS the problem and must be rejected and then replaced with their alt-gendered, atomized and yet collectivized civilization governed through powerful monopoly corporations and the government.

So our hypocrisy and inconsistencies spurred the social justice cancel culture revolution which is itself, through an even worse series of mass injustices against humanity itself, spurring a feeling of anger and reaction, hence 47% of Republicans feeling “patriots” may need to use force to stop this cancel culture war on their values, way of life, and freedom.

We propose that a voluntary return, starting with individuals, to our Judeo-Christian heritage, albeit with modern adaptations and a more inclusive application that serves all American citizens equally, is the better path than any resort to violence. The backlash against the sociopathic behavior of our top politicos and corporate owners, and their rabid authoritarianism, came as a result of our own collective failure to live up to our true manifest destiny as a commonwealth of freedom with liberty and justice for all based on shared Judeo-Christian beliefs, values, and convictions.

People seeing civil war as somehow preferable to the trend toward authoritarianism by the woke corpo-communists of the Democratic Party may not realize that without a full-hearted return to first principles on their part no real lasting change is possible.

But will the fact that such a plurality of people on both sides who believe force may be necessary against the other side lead to violent upheaval? While we would say that this isn’t an immediate risk, it is becoming a growing risk both to the stability of the US and the global systems of trade and collective security that depends upon a strong US military with global power projection.

The “doomsday clock” that might countdown how close we are to a fatal breach of our Union might not by quite at 11pm, but it is well past 10pm and the clock appears to be ticking onward without any sobering sense of what is at stake. The angry victims of the totalitarianism of the left are not resorting to their own core values in a meaningful way beyond voting and the angry left who keep fighting old wars are not sobering up to just how badly they are miscalculating the response their actions will engender.

If either side or both sides sober up, these threats to our Union could disintegrate rapidly, but as we see hardening of positions and the growing militancy of one side spurring an increase in militancy in the other side we recognize that the growing potential for real upheaval.

This is neither necessary nor inevitable and, for now, not a likely possibility. If indeed a serious rupture were to occur, it would be a tragic comedy of errors on the part of one or both sides, therefore we rate this as an emerging threat but not a serious possibility.

Fuel the movement toward the restoration of full freedom for all Americans! JOIN US NOW!

A NEW Dream Of Freedom For All

Bill Collier August 2, 2021

Or- The Upadarian Dream of Freedom, Justice, and Prosperity For All

The concept and vision we refer to as “Upadaria” comes from a series of future “historical fiction” stories presented as written in 2147 that depict the emergence of a new civilization founded on Judeo-Christian ideals which rose as Western Civilization’s decline plunged the world into massive and catastrophic upheaval. This fictional future history became the basis of envisioning new ideas and methods to build freedom in our own lives, relationships, and communities through unilateral action aimed at the restoration and modern adaptation of ancient institutions such as family, extended multi-family households, and nationhood as a spiritual, as opposed to political, construct.

“UPADARIA”, pronounced “you-pah-daria”, is a vision of freedom founded upon a basis of virtue according to historic Christian moral orthodoxy (albeit on a strictly voluntary basis), liberty according to the most generous interpretation of the original spirit and intent of the US Bill of Rights, and independence through individual and mutual material, social, cultural, and economic independency and self-reliance.

Our NEW dream of freedom for all may be revealed and explained through fictional future history, written in 2147, but it is a practical dream for a new reality we can create together, starting in our own minds and hearts, extending to our relationships and families, right now.

Freedom in our society has been reduced, simplified, and watered down to a weak, pale form of individual self-indulgence mostly limited to the ancient world’s “bread and circuses”, or subsistence and entertainment/carnal pleasure. Being on the dole and mostly being encouraged to indulge your more animalistic and shallow carnal desires isn’t freedom, it does not engender dignity, and it positively threatens to destroy your agency and fulfillment as a human created in the image of God.

While you may no doubt feel a craving for freedom, for some way to actualize who you feel you truly are or wish to be, and to not be subjected to the will of others, what you may not realize is what the key missing ingredient in your liberation is. It is something you likely do not suspect and have never before heard before. But it is something that, once actualized in your life and relationships, is practically guaranteed to transfigure your life and circumstances in a most powerful way.

What we are speaking of here is the most powerful means for actualizing human agency known throughout history and for this reason it is something that, in ever tightening circles, the ruling class have assaulted with mich vigor!

The heart of what we propose is essential to true freedom, and not the shallow “bread and circuses freedom” sold by the ruling class to keep us in bondage to them, is best described in technical terms as “organic cohesiveness” and in more traditional terms is the essential spiritual quality that permeates nationhood, tribe, clan, community, extended family, immediate family, and marriage as defined by millenia of moral orthodoxy.

While we begin with and propose a specific form of spiritual nationhood, hence “Upadaria”, the concepts of nationhood as applied down to the individual level can be used by anyone: you don’t need to buy into our particular proposed form of nationhood in order to use these ideas. However, in our presentation of nationhood as a concept, we choose to frame our proposal through the lens of our future fictional history and through our vision and plan for giving birth to a new spiritual nation.

In our new dream of freedom the focus on individual actualization of our scroll of destiny and purpose, of God’s best for our lives, is through a combination of individual spiritual sovereignty and through the warm and supportive embrace of familial type relationships that scale up to the level of entire spiritual nations of people whose God is the Lord. Our dream is strictly voluntary, based on freewill participation, therefore whoever may be critical of our approach or convictions is free to choose another way, we do not desire the use of coercive laws and diktat from the state to advance our spiritual revolution within. We only desire and demand respect for our spiritual sovereignty and for our social, cultural, and economic autonomy as free and independent human beings endowed by our God with certain and self-evident inalienable rights.

We recognize and assert that without the warm embrace of voluntary familial connections we become atomized, isolated individuals who are easy prey to any larger scale powers and interests who wish to harness our labor and make us their servants. Our breakthrough discovery is this: that nationhood as a spiritual construct was ordained by God to nurture familial connections that provide the organic cohesiveness whereby people can essentially choose not only for themselves and their own actions but for the very type of sociocultural reality and norms they wish to be self-governed by.

The new dream of freedom is a form of intentional nationhood anyone can opt into anywhere around the world but which connects people on the basis of freewill participation alone for mutual profit and support from the smallest to the largest scale. This is a very unique proposition, it just doesn’t fit into most people’s expectations or experiences, which for some is simply beyond their comprehension, having been indoctrinated to limit their realm of possibilities to such a narrow horizon. The desire and habit to equate nationhood to such shallow things as politics, citizenship in a country, race, or ancestry is so ingrained that, until the numbers of innovators grow to a larger scale, most people won’t even explore alternatives.

Nationhood is a meta-scale shared SPIRITUAL identity defined by things like ideals, principles, practices, and mandates rooted in common beliefs, values, and convictions. This is very hard to convey with mere words, it is often felt inwardly by those who finally break through the illusions set by the ruling class and who see the whole through the eyes of their spirit.

Whether it is the universal nationhood of all Believers or a diversity manifestation of Kingdom Nationhood such as Upadaria, nationhood, once seen and felt from the spirit, changes everything in relation to the external reality and begins a process of designing and building a new personal reality that cannot be stamped out by the ruling class.

The traditional, in modern terms (because there are far deeper and more ancient traditions), approach to freedom uses trite, predictable language and is overly reliant on politics and the state to advance itself. When we see nationhood as spiritual, voluntary, shared identity based on pure ideals, instead of race or politics, we can both be welcoming to many others and yet also be more selective in who we choose to identify with on the basis of love and affection as opposed to prejudice and “otherfication.”

Being for your nationhood as a way of life and shared identity is NOT about being AGAINST others and their identity and way of life. Peaceful coexistence built on mutual respect for human dignity, human rights, and human flourishing is possible when we understand and practice this more ancient form of spiritual nationhood.

What is the Upadarian nationhood based on?

At its heart, the Upadarian nationality is a form of spiritual nationhood that flows from and builds upon the foundation of the Kingdom of God which is among us, within us, and coming to future fulfillment through God’s power alone. But, beyond this, there are specific convictions that, while not essential to our core identity as followers of Yeshua, who is the Christ and Son of God, are essential to our shared identity as a spiritual nation whose God is the Lord.

The key aspect of this spiritual nation is our shared ideals, principles, practices, and mandates which we make explicit through 17 Protocols which every peer of our nation individually and in free association with others strives to actualize, albeit solely through the power, leading, and provision of God and purely on the basis of freewill participation. We are not building an organization or a hiearchy, we are not creating some class of gurus, lords, or “anointed leaders” who dictate life to other people. Nationhood is something you adopt and then willingly share with others on an equal basis, it isn’t a top-down system of control by the few over the many.

There have been over the years those who have either suspected in this vision some absurd attempt to create a church or closed-minded, insular “cult” and some who, while seemingly welcoming of the vision, so accustomed to top-down control that they desired to impose our vision! In both cases these people are victims of indoctrination by a top-down system of control perpetuated by an immoral ruling class which is emulated even within churches and other types of communities and associations.

Someone who understands and seeks to make Upadaria manifest isn’t prone to submit to any cultish or top-down control by any human being! Those who understand and use our 17 Protocols as God leads and provides do not need or desire a human master to dictate anything to them. Those who follow these 17 Protocols may join organizations and structures based on the Upadarian nationality, but they don’t have to in order to become Upadarian nationals.

Sadly, many of those who would invoke groundless accusations and epithets against spiritual nationhood, whether of Upadaria or anything else, are themselves infected with a cultish top-down mentality which has been in control of their entire existence. They project this to others while denying that they are victims of such abuse at the hands of a corrupt ruling class. The early Christians, who were and remain the eternal prototype for spiritual nationhood, faced similar problems from deluded victims of the cultish Roman imperium.

Invoking nationhood outside the expectations of political citizenship and race or ancestry to find ways to remove your thinking and your lifestyle from under the control of a corrupt ruling class will no doubt cause some to recoil a bit at this seemingly novel approach. But it is essential that we understand nationhood from the perspective of a set of ideals and principles that have their origins in spiritual truth and a spiritual identity.

Our dream of freedom and prosperity for all may have a seemingly unorthodox genesis, the use of nationhood as the organic glue that can connect many people solely on the basis of freewill participation, but the aim is for each person to walk in total freedom and obtain prosperity.

The Vaccine MAY Be Safe, But…

Bill Collier August 2, 2021

Lost in the angry retorts by those opposed to the Covid-19 vaccines is a simple truth: over 99% of recent Covid-19 deaths are unvaccinated individuals. To argue “the vaccine doesn’t work” is a misnomer. But this isn’t the heart of the problem. The heart of the problem is the potential long-term effects of this virus and its long-term success at mitigating the virus.

The real tragedy may be that people who are reasonable and well-educated might reject an otherwise perfectly safe vaccine and then get sick and die without protection. On the other hand, upon what do they have to base their trust: the drug companies, the government, their doctors who depend on the former two for reliable information?

The thing is we SHOULD be able to rely on drug companies and the government for reliable information but we really cannot at this time. The corruption of corporate heads and politicians and their willingness to lie and deceive for self-gain, regardless of the consequences to others, is beyond comprehension.

It’s the opposite of “the boy who cried wolf”, it’s a case where “the boy who cried ‘sheep’ where it was really a wolf!” It may truly be a sheep, but many don’t trust the boy!

Trying to suss out the credibility of claims about the vaccine is difficult because we cannot know if all data needed to make an informed decision is accurate or even available. We know the parties asking us to trust them aren’t trustworthy.

We also know that, for now at least, the vaccine has been shown to prevent serious illness and death. This is a good reason to take the vaccine. The slowness of the FDA in approving the vaccine, the unwillingness of all parties to assume responsibility or make guarantees regarding the vaccine’s effectiveness, and the unavoidable fact this was a rush effort all cause hesitancy.

The response to the hesitant has only made matters worse. Shunning, shaming, and bullying are not useful.

The spread of false information attacking the vaccine has only made matters worse, but these falsehoods are thriving because of factors the powers that be could mitigate. The FDA could stop dragging its feet and either approve vaccine or stop its use, whatever the facts dictate. Someone, anyone, could actually assume legal responsibility for any harm caused if we find, like the polio vaccine, the vaccine is tainted. The government could come clean on the polio vaccine and its true impact.

People will likely die without the vaccine but mostly because the way this roll-out has been conducted doesn’t engender a level of confidence necessary to earn universal compliance.

A Plan For Saving America

Bill Collier August 1, 2021

The Freedomist plan to save America is a threefold approach:

– promote material independency and the increase of faith, family, and community

– promote local civic activism aimed at turning municipalities and counties into Freedom Sanctuaries that are self-sustaining and self-governing through a Town Meeting system

– develop an online and street level activist core which can mobilize thousands in any Congressional District and millions around the country

It is in part through our broadcasting of this vision and arming readers with reliable and actionable intelligence that the Freedomist hopes to gather enough supporters to fund this effort. As and when support grows, our intention is to invest in reaching and gathering people, providing them with key infrastructure to facilitate cooperation and collaboration, and to pay people at the state and Congressional District level to lead efforts to mobilize and support activists.

Without people on the street showing the banner of freedom and confronting the woke communists in a visible way that media cannot conceal, because everyone can see this, it is impossible to begin to reverse the tide of woke cancel culture extremism and the march toward authoritarianism. Our aim is to stop, reverse, and end the woke communist threat against our Union and its regimen of freedom for all citizens.

The very first step you can take to support this effort is to become a subscriber to The Freedomist for as little as $4.99/month. Subscribe now as we grow our audience and content and so we can implement this plan.

Why Did A Sailor Burn Down The USS Bonhomme Richard?

Bill Collier August 1, 2021

The dramatic fire that destroyed the USS Bonhomme Richard was, according to the Navy, allegedly started by a sailor. While the sailor’s idenity has not been revealed, and formal court martial has yet to be announced, it appears this was an act of sabotage. Moreover, their is evidenced of 3 different fires on theee different vessels in San Diego over a 15 month period prior to this major fire.

“The sailor was a member of Bonhomme Richard’s crew at the time and is accused of starting the fire,” Cmdr. Sean Robertson, a U.S. 3rd Fleet spokesperson in San Diego, said in a statement.

The charges “were brought forth against a Navy sailor in response to evidence found during the criminal investigation into the fire started on USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) on July 12, 2020.” The charges against the seaman apprentice are aggravated arson under Article 126 of the Unifrom Code of Military Justice and hazarding a vessel under Article 110.

“Evidence collected during the investigation is sufficient to direct a preliminary hearing in accordance with due process under the military justice system,” Robertson said.

“Vice Adm. Steve Koehler, who commands 3rd Fleet, is considering court-martial charges and has directed a preliminary hearing at which an impartial hearing officer will make determinations and recommendations required by the UCMJ prior to any further trial proceedings – including whether or not there is probable cause to believe an offense has been committed and to offer a recommendation as to the disposition of the case.”

The sailor, a Seaman Apprentice, had been held in custody at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif., before being released in November. At this time they are not in custody.

Pictured above- Federal firefighters assess damage in the hangar bay aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD-6) on July 15, 2020. US Navy Photo

What could some of the motives be? Some possibilities include a sailor disgruntled by the stress of being 2 years in dry dock and facing a deployment, a stressful scenario for many sailors. It could also be more ideological, ranging from right to leftwing radicalism, or even anger over the Navy’s constant and distracting “diversity training” which is clearly ideological brainwashing rather than useful instruction.

One possibility is that the Navy has a simmering problem with morale. We have already seen reports that morale is low, largely effected by the obsession of the command with convincing sailord to “bow to the rainbow” rather than focusing on combat readiness. The ability of sailors today to fight their ships is decidedly decreased over what it was 20 years ago.

This could either cause an angry reaction that, well not at all justified, is somewhat predictable. In that case, if indeed the sailor was disgruntled about the rainbow fascist indoctrination, the likely results could range from cover-up to conceal the problem to exploitation of the crime to double-down on the rainbow fascist indoctrination.

In the event the crime was motivated by leftwing or Islamist ideology, the true nature will be concealed with a focus on the sailor’s mental health.

The outstanding question is whether the Navy, in part through its obsession with ideological indoctrination, is brewing a massive morale problem that could lead to such acts of sabotage. This could either be a result of sailors’ trained to essentially hate their own country may be radicalized or because angry sailors rejecting ideological indoctrination lash out by committing crimes like this.

The opacity of the process by which this has been investigated and the fact the identity of the sailor is concealed and formal charges (as in a court martial) not brought, leads one to believe the actual circumstances and motive surrounding this incident are not useful to the Navy brass’s narrative.

A Freehold Villa- Sustainability and Affordability To Grow Wealth and Increase Freedom

Bill Collier August 1, 2021

Bill Collier- The concept of a freehold villa is basically this: a group of 3-5 nuclear families and single adults connected to them dwell together in a new sort of arrangement that combines private spaces, common areas for residents, and shared spaces with non-residential members of their small group for maximum cost savings and pooling of resources. It offers the ability to become energy and food independent in a sustainable manner while also increasing everyone’s wealth and freedom through strict freewill participation in mutual self-reliance and mutual assurance.

Imagine living in a mansion-like building with lots of amenities, with your own condo, but with access to luxury you could not afford on your own, surrounded by people you feel a kinship bond with who both have your back and share your values. This sounds much better than the atomized life of being a single person or nuclear family against a chaotic and freedom-denying society.

A freehold villa is a different kind of architecture. It is luxury living for working people!

We quite literally need a rewrite of our concept of what constitutes a household of people and of who we live as well as where and how we live, as in our dwelling. The atomized life of being a lone individual or nuclear family against the world only makes it easier for the ruling class to dominate us!

We can decide both to cluster together for greater mutual support and mutual self-preservation and to increase our wealth and happiness while enjoying more luxury than we can now afford.

How it works is a group of relatives, be they by blood and/or by affection or fraternal connection, build a single self-sustaining building that has private condos for the resident nuclear families and single adults. It is limited to members of a related group, be it blood kinship or spiritual kinship based. The design includes all the individual condos for members, common spaces like a great room, pool, gym, shared office space, and kitchens, and luxury amenities for common use, and other areas such as perhaps shops owned by members, a gathering space for members who don’t live on site, and even residential and/or commercial space leased to the public to offset costs.

We can cluster together for mutual support, but it can also mean we experience a level of luxury that has never been possible for people of average income. We envision very nice, well-appointed villas shared by multiple families and single adults who have a kinship bond of some kind.

This reflects a lifestyle and architectural design change meant to enhance individual wealth and freedom unilaterally, that is, without waiting for some law or policy change that is imposed on society. At best, as a freehold villa would have a positive environmental impact, the government should offer tax and other incentives and ease laws and regulations that might make the forming of groups who undertake to build freehold villas more difficult.

You can’t really have a happy experience in such a close-knit arrangement with people who don’t share your sociocultural and perhaps even religious sentiments, values, and convictions. Therefore, residential membership especially needs to be limited to some form of blood and/or spiritual kinship where the residents truly count one another as kin in some way.

It is important to note that race-based clustered living is most certainly not what we have in mind and, moreover, we wouldn’t consider such an approach to be morally justified. When clearly blood kin are probably mostly all considered the same “race”, in most cases you will need more than blood kin to form such a cluster of people and for this a form of spiritual kinship related to shared beliefs and values alone is far superior. This can and likely will include people who aren’t considered the same race.

Freedomists believe race is a negative social construct that breeds hatred and division and should be discarded in favor of equity and equality applied to every single human being from birth to death with respect for their human rights, human dignity, and human flourishing. An inherent spiritual sovereignty endowed by our Creator requires respect for our rights to life, liberty, and property as well as the rights to pursue happiness and form our own freewill participatory associations and communities that reflect our values.

We also believe equal and fair access to affordable housing, while not a “right” per se, is a mark of an advanced civilization and a requirement of justice. We do not ever want to see our concept of clustered living and clustered housing, which is all predicated on freewill participation, become a means of segregation by race or denial of fair housing practices.

We simply believe we need and have a right to pursue clustered living and clustered housing as a solution to the present sociocultural and socioeconomic crises. We believe this is a necessary bulwark for the well-being and freedom of average people in the face of an archaic and selfish ruling class who are lost in the industrial age top-downism of the 20th century. The modern revival of an extended multi-family household cluster is essential to bolstering freedom and wealth within a society facing multiple crises.

A sustainable, green, and environmentally-friendly but luxurious villa can make people more free and prosperous while protecting them from hazards, crises, and disasters.

In such a scenario of clustered housing, the building is owned by a mutual benefit corporation (MBC) and the residential members each own shares, requisite to their private space. So someone who has a smaller place has fewer shares and pays less. But membership in the MBC is limited in some way to people who are somehow in a kinship type relationship.

A freehold villa is neither a commune where everyone just lives together in one house nor a condominium where everyone owns a separate condo. But it is in fact a single, albeit multi-family, extended household. Our society doesn’t have a concept of an extended multi-family household that is both a cluster of a few single households and is itself like a single household.

Note: you could also opt for a freehold cluster, which is a group of individual homes surrounding a common house with luxury amenities and that includes shops and commercial as well as residential space leased to the public. This may be more expensive than a freehold villa and would be more difficult in urban areas.

Clustering together in a shared space and behaving as a “household of households” is the major lifestyle change involved here. Because our goal is freedom and prosperity, this is not any sort of collective or commune, your own space is your own but you also share space and resources and you practice mutual self-reliance and mutual assurance with people who you feel kinship toward.

An urban freehold villa may build upward instead of outward and include both members’ housing and housing offered on a fair housing basis to the public. Creating sustainable “towers” in a cityscape is good for the planet and increases wealth and freedom for average people living and working in cities.

In an era of major disasters, supply chain disruptions, security challenges, upheavals and riots, and a worsening climate for freedom-minded and religious people especially, the freehold villa is a positive and concrete response that will buttress its members from these storms. You will find that the lone individual or nuclear family isn’t able to withstand these threats to their freedom and wealth without close-knit mutual support.

The freehold villa and the revival in modern form of an extended multi-family household cluster (like the ancient Oikos), is an idea well suited to our time and the architecture of a freehold villa is precisely what will make this clustered living more practical and profitable to all involved.

Coming together in a way that both respects your privacy and individuality and provides you with warm and nurturing connections with other people who are physically close by is a tangible alternative to the atomized life of decreased wealth, freedom, and happiness.

Other larger clustered housing arrangements include a freehold estate of as many as 5 of these smaller clusters, around 120 adults, or a larger single building with these 5 clusters, called a freehold castle. We do not recommend clustered housing beyond 120 or so adults as this wouls engender segregation within a locale. Moreover, we do recommend that some space offered to the public be set aside both to offset costs and prevent insularity and isolation.

Clustered living in some of kinship with other people you feel deeply connected to can, when approached with balance, promote the prosperity and freedom for all and both protect you from the many crises of our era and increase your chances of being a success.

Workers Are The Real Producers of Wealth: Why Don’t We Respect That?

Bill Collier July 31, 2021

In our society, according to the powers that be, the scope of your “freedom” as a wealth producing worker is strictly limited to how you choose to sexually pleasure yourself! Everything else is off the table because all you are ever allowed to be is a mindless, alt-gendered, undifferentiated and atomized commodity the ruling class can buy and sell. It is in fact the greatest crime against humanity in world history.

Bill Collier- I have never been a blue collar worker, except briefly as a teenager in a major printing firm, I have always been in sales and/or marketing and producing content with my brain. While I believe my efforts are beneficial to society, I am concerned that the economic structure of our civilization tends toward empowering governments and mega corporate ownership over the greatest producers of wealth, the workers.

On one hand, would-be blue collar business owners are encumbered with red tape that smothers them with regulations and then sucked dry with taxes that transfers wealth from workers to government bureaucrats and favored groups and backers of those in power. On the other hand, thanks to collusion and the concentration of ownership in business from the many to the few, the exploitation of workers and the limitations on their options keeps the average worker in their place with few real options.

Thanks to a relatively free market capitalism, we might say a 70% capitalism, outside the business enterprise, we see real wealth even for those on the bottom grow even as the gap between an average producer of wealth and the “owners” of the enterprise grows staggeringly in favor of the ruling class.

Quite simply, the free market capitalist system and ethos stops at the company door. Inside, the entire structure resembled a neofuedal satrapy lorded over by one or a few ultra wealthy people filled with hubris, ego, and a lust for greater conquests at the expense of average people.

Today’s wealthy ownership class who control most shares have become the most greedy and self-absorbed group of people in human history. Their constant virtue-signalling over social and cultural issues of no concern to working people or consumers may either be an outgrowth of their desire to control their world or an effort to paint themselves in a more favorable light regardless of their rapacious appetite.

The core principles of free market capitalism don’t apply to the worker or to the interior of the corporation that uses workers as a commodity. The very concept of “human resources” reduces workers to a “resource” of no concern to the owners, a commodity to be bought and sold for maximum gain to its owners. The mentality is truly “we the majority shareholders own you the actual wealth producer and can buy and sell you for our benefit alone.”

Even as these ruling class snobs act like they own human beings, pushing them into increasingly inhumane conditions that violate their very human dignity, they deign to dictate culture and to punish those mere serfs on their fiefdoms who don’t comply with their radical plans to produce an alt-gendered, undifferentiated and atomized mass of poor working slaves who have no faith and no family and little real agency beyond their sexual gratification.

Ask yourself why the ruling class, the great reset people who don’t want you owning anything, so desperately push woke cancel culture as an assault on traditional faith and family.

You think you and all your pronouns, your whole alt-gendered undifferentiated atomized self, isn’t exactly what the new robber barons want?

They ALL push your “edgy” ideas and even deplatform those who don’t think we need 500 “genders” or to abandon faith and family. The ruling class favor your “edgy” ideas and punish people who don’t agree with you and you are too arrogant to see how you are being played.

Nobody cares what you identify yourself as or who you love, they just want to be a part of that. What we do want and demand is equal respect for our views and legal sanction and protection for our way of life, which is rooted in faith and family according to millenia of moral and doctrinal orthodoxy.

It’s amusing how people being transformed into serfs by the ruling class can’t see how all their “edgy” ideas are quite literally created, favored, and imposed by those who wish to enslave them. You hate God, your traditional parents, your country, and tradition itself and you imagine you are free and advancing into the future toward a new evolution of humanity. You aren’t. It’s just the latest slaver trick to turn you into a lust-craved animal whose only desires are limited to shallow self-pleasure.

Again, NOBODY CARES about your pronouns or what gender you are today or who you sleep with or love. Nobody. But we do care about deeper and more important things and while you can do as you like, we just won’t play your little game or buy into your cultural concepts, which we find destructive and more conducive to slavery. We are FOR our way of life and for total freedom for all, we are not against your way of life or how you define yourself or who you love.

The issue here is not whether you can decide things like sexuality or gender or whatever on your own terms, it is whether anyone is allowed any greater freedom than this and whether those whose values are rooted in faith and family are treated equally and fairly or whether they are somehow forced to adopt the new atomized alt-gendered “culture” on pain of being canceled if they don’t.

Workers, the real producing class, lose agency and increasingly, after decades of advancement, face real contractions of wealth, home ownership, and agency which also destroy their dignity and violate their basic human rights. The great reset equals the cultural demise of faith and family as a means of pushing workers into serfdom. The entire purpose of the rainbow dictatorship over culture, aiming at faith and family and creating an alt-gendered undifferentiated and atomized mass of serfs, is to enslave almost everyone save the ruling class!

The ruling class, working through both parties normally, has also hit on the idea of a new form of communism, combining the “woke” propaganda of rainbow dictatorship with a collaboratively planned monopoly economy in partnership between the corporate ownership class and the top politicos. Woke communism is the transfer of wealth from the many to the few all while invoking the language and utopian promises of socialism and all while destroying faith and family through a new push to impose an alt-gendered over-sexualized culture that turns most people into little more than animals in constant heat!

Workers are the true producers of wealth and our top-down, centralized planned economic hegemony doesn’t respect them at all. The ruling class in this country are working toward a day when you own nothing, when you are owned, and your only “freedom”, is to have sex with anyone or anything that suits your hyper-sexualized desires.

Concentration of wealth and assaults on faith and family are all part of a grand scheme by the ruling class to turn workers into serfs. People like Bezos, Zuckerberg, Tim Cook, Warren Buffet, et al, all agree with the great reset, all promote “woke” cancel culture assaults on faith and family, and all tend to support a one-party rule over America that favors them and turns workers into undifferentiated atomized individuals who are mere cogs in the machine.

All the “edgy” people armed with a dizzying array of pronouns, think they are the future and the next evolution. But this uncultured attempt to turn every person into an over-sexed, atomized, and undifferentiated being without agency is as old as slavery itself. It is the past, it is barbarism, and it is devolution that shows total contempt for the workers.

Great Reset Update: Eviction Moratorium Ends, Millions Could Be Effected

Bill Collier July 31, 2021

The moratorium on evictions, which was created by the CDC during the height of the pandemic outbreak, has ended in part due to a Supreme Court ruling saying the CDC has no authority doing this and because Congress could not pass an emergency measure extending the moratorium.

There are over 5.7 million Americans behind on their rent and over $20 billion in rent is past due. What is concerning to many is that despite all these federal payouts in the trillions nothing was provided to assuage the problem, as in the $20 billion in unpaid rent which caused real financial problems for landlords.

Why were there no provisions to assist small landlords who could not afford to weather losing so much income in order to keep the real estate market more stable? The answer is that the ruling class are positively hostile to anyone save the very rich owning real estate in this country, their goal being the end of private ownership outside of government and mega corporate entities they, the ruling class, control.

Landlords, many of whom are middle class owners of one or a few properties, have been unprotected and losing money while renters have been unable to make ends meet due to the government mandated lockdowns of the entire population. The balance between the landlords who went without income and the renters who lost income had never been struck.

The moratorium didn’t end the running up of a tab, renters who didn’t pay anything still owe full rent for all those months. In some cases, renters have actually abused the property and took advantage of the situation and could not be evicted even in those cases.

But many landlords are also major owners of multiple properties and renting homes to the massss has become an industry of its own, often offering poorer quality residences for increasingly high costs to maximize profits. These speculative landlords drive up prices for housing, making it more difficult for the lower income among us, which, ironically, means the same house or apartment they overpay to rent cannot be bought even if they have been renting it for years.

Home ownership is an essential elment in achieving total material independency but too many obstacles to home ownership, including how we do credit checks, taxes, and real estate speculation are making home ownership impossible for poorer people and the young.

Sympathy for the landlords is just not there because most people see a typically wealthy owner of multiple properties who overcharges renters and speculatively buys multiple properties, driving up prices which hurts the very people forced to rent from them. But many other landlords are not rich people or speculative real estate buyers, they are average people who may rent out a room or a guest house or property they inherited.

The collision now between landlords of every type and renters who have either been unable or unwilling to pay is real and the potential for a new housing crisis, not to mention a rush on the courts, is substantial. Could the smaller landlords be forced out of their business only to see mega corporate landlords take over more property and continue a trend away from individual ownership to corporate ownership of real estate?

The “great reset” claims “you will own nothing and like it”, and the disorganized way this moratorium is ending may contribute even more to the transfer of wealth and ownership from the many to the few. This does not bode well for the cause of promoting individual material independency as a means of increasing freedom for all.

Legally, this moratorium was unfounded and many renters did in fact receive substantial federal money allegedly to sustain themselves, so at least some payment to these landlords could have been made. But the entire issue points to the core problem that property ownership itself is in jeopardy and the rules, laws, and regulations as well as taxes surrounding property ownership are more conducive to the concentration of ownership in few hands than the material independency of individuals.

Why I Remain Unvaccinated

Bill Collier July 30, 2021

Bill Collier- My hesitancy on the vaccine is more rooted in the rather outlandish and, frankly, authoritarian responses and the refusal to countenance real questions, than anything else. Add to that the fact this is a new vaccine, the same government pushing this has done some really awful things, and the fact now things shifted from the vaccine providing immunity to now vaccinated people have to mask up again.

The “vaccine fascists” need to re-learn the American’s Creed to understand why bullying, shaming, and coercing undermine confidence and only engender resistance. The homeland of “give me liberty or give me death” isn’t going to, I hope, give up on its essential creed, not even for a virus that has a less than half percent mortality rate.

I genuinely feel there is no real overwhelming guarantee this thing is as beneficial as claimed in the long term or that it may not have some serious problems. I may be wrong, but claling me a conspiracy theorist or canceling me will not only fail to convince me and be morally reprehensible for you to do, it will convince others this whole vaccine regimen isn’t to be trusted.

I can be convinced. I do notice that 99% of recent deaths are people without the vaccine. But, honestly, will this remain the same? It was also reported the Delta variant is more lethal, exact numbers not explained, and more contagious. This is also concerning.

Browbeating me or mandating this only fills me with alarm. Again, I DO NOT TRUST a government that has repeatedly and dangerously lied to me all my life! Too often the government claims their measures are beneficial and decades later Congress passes a resolution begging forgiveness.

The much vaunted polio vaccine infected almost 100 million people with a cancer-causing virus, but to this day the government, the same one extolling the vaccine of the hour, refuses to seriously study and reveal how many lives were lost or how many people got cancer and had their lives ruined. How can we take them seriously?

My hesitancy decreases and I am ready to start the process, then some authoritarian nub screeches terrible things about the unvaccinated being worse than Satan, or something outlandish like that, and I recoil. I don’t know why the ruling class are so adamant about this but I doubt anyone, ever, thinks these louts care about anything but being more powerful. But the fact there is such a full press on and it has so many authoritarian features fills me with dark suspicion.

The trend further away from treating people with dignity and respect, tolerance for all views and creeds, and respect for human rights, amd the trend toward ever more partisan and authoritarian responses meant to gain political advances, has consequences. A plurality of people, who are already demonized by the leftwing authoritarians for not being “woke” enough, just can’t see why they should trust people who call them nazis and racists at the slightest hint of disagreement!

Vaccines may indeed eliminate this vurus as a serious threat. The unvaccinated may spur new varieties that can render the vaccine useless for everyone else. This is a real concern. On the other hand, unlike polio, which had a 5-10% mortality, this virus has a very small mortality rate. What this means is that if we discover, too late to fix it, that all these vaccines do real long-term harm, we could see more harm done by the vaccines than by the virus over, say, a 30 year period.

I am not claiming we will see such harm. But, in light of the government’s predilection to lying, and in light of the continued refusal to face the truth about tainted polio vaccines, being skeptical seems quite reasonable. I am proposing that polling back the demonizing and authoritarianism, on all fronts, may be far more conducive to winning people over to get the vaccine. Doubling down on the hate and authoritarianism will only further fragment society and increase distrust.

This notion a few talking heads are convincing people the vaccine will make them grow two heads and that’s why some remain skeptical is garbage. It’s like when someone is not complying with your wishes and you accuse them of letting someone else convince or control them instead assuming they can think for themselves based on the facts as they see them.

Perhaps the accusers bear the mental illness of letting others dictate their beliefs through propaganda and are just projecting on to others. But trying to convince me this is safe in the long-term, as well as effective, means total transparency, being treated with dignity, and a total commitment to my right to choose my health options.

I want to believe this is safe and effective but when the argument against any questions about these things is canceling people, authoritarianism, and constant one-sided propaganda, it’s not conducive to building trust. When I see everyone, from government to the manufacturers, is absolved of all responsibility if it does you harm, this is disconcerting. Everyone demands we take the vaccine but offers neither an iron-clad guarantee nor assumes accountability and responsibility if they fail to deliver.

I may get the vaccine. I am praying God protects me if I do and even if, once again, we find the government failed, the vaccine didn’t work or was tainted, and the government tries desperately to cover it up for 40 years before Congress passes a resolution apologizing for our country’s misdeeds.