In a lose-lose for the DNC, a case is working its way through the courts that will either cement local power to resist Federal DNC coercive power against the right to bear arms or local power to resist Federal laws that they do not like by declaring themselves sanctuary cities. The case is first going through the Oregon circuit, which is highly DNC-infused, so their dilemna will be particularly acute as they seek to rule in a way that perpetuates the party over the power, but to do so without undermining that power at the same time. Will they protect the right to bear arms to protect DNC local power to resist Federal power when Federal power is not party power or will they assault our fundamental right to bear arms at the expense of local DNC power?
