April 23, 2026

Staff

Majority in Venezuela Vote to Eat Minority

WORLD- Bill Collier

“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb having a vote about what to have for lunch”.

Venezuela’s election wasn’t even close. The progressive strong man, Hugo Chavez, handily defeated state governor Henrique Capriles 55 to 45 in the presidential election.

But WHY, when you consider the miserable state of Venezuela’s economy, the fact that Venezuela’s capital, Caracas, is the murder capital of the WORLD, and the fact that Chavez is a menace to individual political and economic freedom?

Nobody is claiming that the vote count was crooked.  Chavez is, however, accused of spending the nation’s oil revenues on his campaign, including giving hand-outs to any group of people who will vote for him.

The progressive strong man offered more of the same- more state control over the economy, more socialist wealth redistribution, and less political and economic freedom for all. Despite this, if the vote count was accurately reported, 55% of the people elected to continue down the road to a state-controlled society.

This really does give meaning to the old phrase “democracy is two wolves and a lamb having a vote about what to have for lunch”. The majority vote to eat the minority, almost every time.

This is a fundamental flaw in “pure democracy”, especially with an under-educated populace and a media establishment that parrots only one party line….but enough about what’s happening in America, this is all about Venezuela.

Do the 55% who voted to eat the 45% really think that eating their producers, and shackling them with crippling regulations, is going to work out for ANYONE in the long term, do they really think that this model is NOT going to produce more tyranny, less freedom, more control, less opportunity, and, ultimately, chaos and poverty? They evidently cannot see past their own IMMEDIATE parochial interests.

The legitimate power of the state, as defined in an objective reading of the Bible, for instance, does not extend into the realms of the sacred, the social, and the market beyond keeping the peace.

Even many who do not embrace the Bible can surely agree that this standard is better than “government can do anything it wants, as long as some popular vote is behind the politicians who run the state”.

By this standard anything MOST people want is “legitimate”, even if what they want is your life, your liberty, and your property.

For the 45% who chose to move away from the progressive nanny state and towards greater freedom and opportunity, the future looks like this-the majority are going to continue to eat the whole until there’s nothing left for anyone.

 

Obama 2013- Freedom Still Lives On

WASHINGTON-  Bill Collier

An Obama win does not mean the end of the world or the demise of the nation IF freedom lovers actually focus on their local and state governments.

For those whose priorities are ethics and morality first and then strengthening family and marriage, free and equal opportuniy for all. The economy, and America’s global security, an Obama win would be a setback. We can expect more debt, bigger and bigger government, higher energy prices, global compromise with Islamists, an all-out assault on Christian faith and values, even persecution of churches, wealth transfer from the producers to Obama suporters, among many other negative consequences.

You can be sure that Obama will continue to follow the Cass Sunstein model of regulatory tyranny in an effort to get around, and openly contradict, the will of Congress. INDEED things could get so bad that a real Constitutional crisis would emerge with open defiance of these exrra-legal regulations amd executive orders.

Publicly funded late-term abortion on demand, however, remains the greatest threat of a second term for the abortion president. Obama’s fanatical devotion to infanticide and population control is going to come to the fore if he is re-elected.

All of the things Obama accuses his opponents of he will do.

Obama will end social security,  medicare and medicaid as we know it, taking benefits from millions to pay for his continued nationalization of the entire economy- his goal is total federal management over every industry in an effort to create a socialist and secular utopia. Of course he is lying about his goals and plans for the future.  This is the typical path for radical socialists whose real beliefs are so unpopular.

THAT being said,   if freedom seekers take the fight for a strong and prosperous free society to the local level, much of Obama’s socialist, anti-Christian agenda can be stunted and weathered.

Getting local officials to commit to resisting extra-legal and immoral policies is the key. This is what the focus of our energy needs to be if Obama wins. It would be a setback, but it wouldn’t be the end of the world.

MORE ON OBAMA 2013-

Feb 11, 2012 President Barack Obama will unveil a budget on Monday that projects a $901   billion deficit in fiscal 2013 while earmarking billions of dollars for
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/…/newsdaily-obama-budget-to-forecast-901-billion-deficit-in –2013/
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/…/section-100122-of-highway-bill-blocks-roll-your-own- cigarettes-2/
Jul 2, 2012 President Obama said “I like it,” in response to the term “ ObamaCare ” when   used by his ….Obama 2013– IF Obama Wins- Hope Lives On
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/…/section-100122-of-highway-bill-blocks-roll-your-own- cigarettes-2/
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/01/obama-rejects-keystone-pipeline/
Did Barack Obama commit treason against America by leaking THE FLAME virus   …. but to where they look now that the plan has been rejected until 2013. Well
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/01/obama-rejects-keystone-pipeline/
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/06/obamas-tin-russian-ear/
Jun 23, 2012 Obama’s Massive Tax Hike on Americans is now called exactly what it …. Markets  : Spain’s government to announce 2013 budget and reforms
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/06/obamas-tin-russian-ear/
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/10/obama-debate-meme-picture-mockup/
2 days ago FREEDOMIST Exclusive- Obama To Blame for Waldo Canyon Fire …. Markets:   Spain’s government to announce 2013 budget and reforms
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/10/obama-debate-meme-picture-mockup/
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/10/romney-trounces-obama-at-debate/
2 days ago Obama’s Massive Tax Hike on Americans is now called exactly what it …. Markets  : Spain’s government to announce 2013 budget and reforms
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/2012/10/romney-trounces-obama-at-debate/
freedomist.com
freedomist.com/…/americans-for-prosperity-rolls-out-ad-blitz-against- obamacare/
Obama’s Massive Tax Hike on Americans is now called exactly what it is. Taxing   the …. Markets: Spain’s government to announce 2013 budget and reforms

The Obama Race Speech –

The Real One from 2007

A 40 minute sermon by Barack Obama, speaking with Reverend Jeremiah Wright in the audience, reads like standard boiler-plate liberation theology rhetoric. In the speech a strangely accented Obama is peddling the Marxist/Racist rhetoric so familiar to men like Jeremiah Wright, who denies that Jesus is God or that the Bible is the Word of God, but the problem is that this is not the “Obama” being sold to the American voters by the Progressive Media.

In the sermon, Obama refers to America’s “tragic history” regarding race and says that Hurricane Katrina opened the curtain to “what had been going on” for a long time, implying racism.

Hannity, on his show, plays samples from both the well-known Obama Race Speech that the media hailed as “historic” and the original race speech he did on this video in which he sounds totally different as a if a typical race-baiting conspiracy theorist. In fact, if the audience was White his speech would come across as White Supremacism.

Tucker Carlson believes Obama is saying “the Federal Government doesn’t like you because you’re Black” and accuses Obama of pandering and playing a “role”. He believes that when you look at these two speeches that “in at least one of them” Obama is playing a role to pander to the office- bad no matter how you slice it.

His speech essentially blames all of the problems in the Black Community on racism. He also talks about the Iraq war as a failure and says “it is time for us to end this war in Iraq.”

The speech was performed after Reverend White was dis-invited from speaking at the announcement of Obama’s candidacy, even AFTER Obama allegedly disavowed his hateful rhetoric. Far from disavowing it, in this sermon Obama mimics his language and praises him. The difference between the speech in California and the speech in Philadelphia is extremely stark, it;s as if there are two different “Obamas”.

A few lines from the speech plastered on Drudge:

‘Need help with basic skills, how to shop, how to show up for work on time, how to wear the right clothes, how to act appropriately in an office’..

‘We don’t need to build more highways out in the suburbs. We should be investing in minority-owned businesses, in our neighborhoods’…

The video was obtained by The Daily Caller and is being released via Sean Hannity on Fox News. A full version is being made available on The Daily Caller.

Obama refers to the Blacks in the room as “our People”, drawing a line of division between Black and non-Black Ameericans.

Excerpts we believe from the speech:
Obama on Pastor Jeremiah Wright-

Obama’s ‘scrubbed speech’

 

Reading the proverbial political tea leaves, in light of the Drudge red letter update, I am predicting Condoleezza Rice gets the stamp of approval from Romney’s wife.

Romney’s wife is not a show pony, she’s active, engaged, and has strong opinions, and more than a little horse sense.

Rice is respectable, smart, and will likely excite many voters, including independencts and conservatives. Liberals will hate anyone who runs.

I think Rubio or Demint would be great picks, I still wish Palin was on the ticket at the top, but Rice would be a bold, surprising, but not really risky move- just up Romney’s alley!

Posted from WordPress for Android

This morning the Supreme Court ruled on what is known as “Obamacare” by supporters and opponents alike.

The court ruled that the individual mandate is a “tax” and is therefore LEGAL, shocking observers and outraging Constitutionalists.

The media had initially guessed that the court would rule 8-1 in favor of the mandate but in the weeks leading up to the ruling conventional wisdom shifted against such an outcome.

Obamacare supporters felt that an ruling against the health care law would set America back and undo what they say as historic progress, while opponents said that if the ruling favored the individual mandate, under the commerce clause, it would be like saying there is no limit to Federal power.

Outraged Americans, most of whom oppose the law as an afffront to the very concept and principle of a limited, Constitutional Republic, are no considering, as one said to us, “that the courts are no longer a viable means of hatling the slide towards turanny” and that “other means” will have to be discovered and employed in the fight to stop the federal goverment from becoming the new Soviet empire in America.

Of course, proponents are delighted and consider this an historic win for their side, which does not believe in a constitutional republic but which embraces a form of democratic socialism like what Europe has.

Supreme Court Obamacare Ruling Here

Lack Of Firefighting Aircraft Due To Obama- William Raymond Collier

President Obama’s administration used complicated and what some see as overly strict regulations to ground a fleet of 6 critical firefighting aircraft, including a Boeing 747.

In September of past year the Forestry Service cancelled a contract on ground many see as spurious. This is the original press release…. Forestry Service Cancells Contract

At the same time, the Air Force’s budget was cut resulting in a total availability of 8 Air Force C-130’s, four of which are engaged in Colorado.

The inability of officials to contain these fast-moving fires is directly related to the arbitrary cancellation of this contract back in September. Those 6 aircraft, if availale now, would more than double the airborne firefighting capability of Colorado firefighters. It is probable that these fires would have been contained if those aircraft had been available right now.

In addition to the lost aircraft, the Obama administration has been slow to meet the needs of maintaing the fire fighting aircraft left intact after this arbitrary cut.

 

Here is the press release itself:

US Forest Service Cancels Airtanker Contract with Aero Union California company did not meet agency’s safety standards

WASHINGTON, July 29, 2011–The U.S. Forest Service announced today that it has terminated its contract with Aero Union of Sacramento, Calif., because the company failed to meet its contractual obligations. The company was providing six airtankers under exclusive-use contracts to the Forest Service.                              “Our main priority is protecting and saving lives, and we can’t in good conscience maintain an aviation contract where we feel lives may be put at risk due to inadequate safety practices” said Tom Harbour, director of the Forest Service’s Fire and Aviation Management program. “This contract termination notwithstanding, we possess the aircraft support needed for this year’s fire season.”                              The Forest Service has access to additional aviation assets to meet operational needs. Two other private companies provide 11 large airtankers under exclusive-use contracts. In addition, there are two very large airtankers available through a “call when needed” contract, as well as eight military firefighting aircraft.

The five-year contract the Forest Service signed with Aero Union in 2008 required participation in a continued airworthiness program, which included a Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Evaluation and structural inspection program. In April 2011, Aero Union informed the Forest Service that the Federal Aviation Administration found the company was not in compliance with its mandated structural inspection program requirements.

Because of the extraordinary stresses placed on aircraft during aerial firefighting and to prevent catastrophic failures and ensure safety, the Forest Service adds requirements to its airtanker contracts that are specific to the agency’s firefighting mission. The Forest Service will not use aircraft that do not meet its requirements.

The mission of the USDA Forest Service is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the Nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations. The Agency manages 193 million acres of public land, provides assistance to State and private landowners, and maintains the largest forestry research organization in the world.

____________________________________________________________________

Here is an excerpt from an article by Michelle Malkin detailing the Obama admin’s mishandling of the firefighting aircraft:

Michelle Malkin » How Obama Bureaucrats Fueled Western Wildfires

Jun 19, 2012 by Michelle Malkin
So, no shovel-ready planes? Actually, there are: On June 20th, 2012 at 1:50 am, mcridge said: Michelle, Another option that the U.S. Forest Service is ignoring is the Evergreen Aviation Supertanker Service. This is a huge 747 ….. Odd that you ignore that the older smaller federally owned planes were replaced with newer larger fire fighting aircraft (per Bush) now operated by the military and how many private fire fighter aircraft as well as if you might notice fixed wing

More results from Michelle Malkin

This story shows how the fire fighters had to wait for aircraft to arrive, aircraft that could have been there but for Obama’s cutting of the ones that were already there-

Two specially equipped Air Force C-130 cargo planes were helping fight the fire, and a third was expected later in the day.

With the nation’s privately owned fleet of heavy air tankers already in use or unavailable, U.S. Forest Chief Tom Tidwell said his agency had to call on the military to help.

Tidwell told The Associated Press in a phone interview Monday that about half of the nation’s personnel who are usually assigned to large fires are working in Colorado right now.

from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/26/colorado-wildfires-2012-r_n_1626919.html

Obama To Stump In Colorado?-  William Raymond Collier

In a stunning display of hubris and political synicism President Obama is likely to show up in Colarado tomorrow or Friday at the latest.

During his appearance, The Freedomist has learned, Obama plans to talk about how the GOP is “distracting” America from “real problems” like the fires in Colorado with their “endless investigation” into Fast and Furious.

If the Supreme Court rules goes against him, Obama will also denounce Republican efforts to “cut programs” like “the kind of programs that fund emergency services.”

Obama will not name the GOP and will attempt to include these remarks as obliquely as possible so that his media allies can provide cover and accuse those who see the partisan tone of “nitpicking.”

“The whole thing”, according to what we have learned, “is designed to make it look and feel like it is objectively true that the GOP and their Supreme Court appointees are being unreasonable and partisan….to make the GOP look ‘unfair’ to independent voters especially.”

The effort is being rushed and officials are scrambling to get security arrangements in place because of the short notice.

 

Progressives tried to use “murder by cop” to silence and opponent to their freedom-taking agenda. It’s called “SWATtin” and the objective is to get an opponent killed by the police, that’s really the bottom line. To see how they do it, and why, go here — From Publius Forum- Aaron Worthing Wins Blow for Free Speech, Then Gets SWATed « Publius Forum/

The Progressive Politocracy is out of control and no blogger who opposes them is “off limits”, in fact there are no boundaries they are not willing to crash through to silence their oppponents. This is the nature of a man-made ideology that depends on the State to solve every problem. Christians rely on God to makes things right, therefore they can afford to forego trying to force people to think or act the way they want them to.

Progressives, despite their claim of religious affiliation, are godless freedom-takers who think the state is the source of life and the solver of every problem. For them it is not “immoral” to use the police to kill their opponents by making fake 911 calls- it’s just another example of the Progressive instinct to use the state to solve their problems. Legal actions are not being organized because, 1, we don’t know WHO is behind this other than Progressives and, 2, the authorities (like the Attorney General) are too busy fighting the People to protect their rights. This is what happens when Progressives are in power.

 

Kim Jong Un Replaces Kim Jong Il- Hawkish 29 Year Old Rules North Korea 

The portly, competitive, and self-absorbed heir of Kim Jong Il, who breathed his last on the 17th or 18th of December, is a son of privilege who went to private schools in Switzerland and who is known in many circles to be rather hawkish with regards to North Korea’s foreign policy. Kim Jong Un does not have the experience to lead a troop of window washers let alone a nation, but his petulant fingers will control North Korea’s nuclear weapons.  (more…)

US Troops Reported In Jordan

We are seeing numerous unconfirmed reports that US forces are inside of Jordan at this hour, but their intentions and their planned length of stay is not known.

While some reports claim that US forces are deployed opposite of the Syrian border with Jordan to forestall Syrian forays into the Hashemite Kingdom, other possibilities are far less ominous.

When the US went to war against Iraq, American forces transited through Jordan from Aqaba and some deployed to help with Iraqi refugees.

This may be what is happening now US forces may be transiting in reverse, from Iraq via Jordan to the port of Aqaba. Additionally, US forces may be helping with Syrian refugees.

If, however, US forces have deployed to Jordan to defend against a possible Syrian incursion, this would violate the spirit and letter of the War Powers act, placing US forces in potential combat zones without even a nod towards Congress. This would prove controversial in the extreme, especially in today’s political climate.

If US forces have deployed from Iraq to Jordan to stave off a potential Syrian move it would most likely be the result of some form of substantiated intelligence. The Syrian regime is still smarting over an incursion of Syrian protestors into Jordan who attacked their embassy in Amman and may also be targeting refugees with operatives who infiltrate the Syrian refugee camps in Jordan. The threat, therefore, may be more covert than overt and merely having US forces “pause” en route to Aqaba could be enough.

Other possibilities, however, include a potential positioning of forces for a new Libya-like intervention should the opposition in Syria materialize into a cohesive force that can take and hold territory. The “no-fly zone” approach has been used with telling effect against Serbia, Saddam Hussein, and Qhadafi. US ground forces would prevent an incursion into Jordan and could even protect Iraq, whose government is alarmed at the possibility of being flooded with Syrian refugees.

The transiting of US troops out of Iraq through Jordan makes perfect sense however it is possible that this could be a good cover for other purposes as well.

Main

Back FREEDOM for only $4.95/month and help the Freedomist to fight the ongoing war on liberty and defeat the establishment's SHILL press!!

Are you enjoying our content? Help support our mission to reach every American with a message of freedom through virtue, liberty, and independence! Support our team of dedicated freedom builders for as little as $4.95/month! Back the Freedomist now! Click here