The Texas law that allows its citizens to sue social media platforms for deleting them for belief alone was upheld by a Federal Appeals court that ruled 3-0 in favor of the Texas Law. “Today we reject the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say,” U.S. 5th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Oldham in justifying the ruling.
A statement by one of the anti-American orgs supporting the continued oppression of free expression by the DNC-led anti-American social media platforms reveals the perverse nature of the leftist ideology these groups serve.
“We remain convinced that when the U.S. Supreme Court hears one of our cases, it will uphold the First Amendment rights of websites, platforms, and apps,” Carl Szabo, NetChoice’s vice president and general counsel.
The websites do not need a first amendment protection if they are not publishers. The statement exposes the fact these social media platforms are de facto publishers, which opens them up to lawsuits far more pervasive and onerous to their world-colonizing plans than the Texas law this anti-American group rejects.
These “websites” are public communications hubs, and as such must honor the free speech, free expression rights of its users, otherwise they should lose their special protections from criminal and civil legal proceedings.
The ruling puts the Texas law on a collision course with the Supreme Court, who is now dealing with two appeals court judgments that oppose one another. The test for the continued spirit of America is coming through SCOTUS once again, as we Americans are about to learn if our judiciary recognizes we are a republic, not a democracy, and not a leftist genocidal soviet.
About Author
Paul Collier
Paul Collier is the editor of The Freedomist newsite, our Weekday Reports, and our Monthly Publication, Freedomist Intelligence Advisor (previously McAlvany Intelligence Advisor). He has been involved in news publishing since 2003.
