Obama Race Speech- The Real One

W R Collier Jr October 5, 2012

The Obama Race Speech –

The Real One from 2007

A 40 minute sermon by Barack Obama, speaking with Reverend Jeremiah Wright in the audience, reads like standard boiler-plate liberation theology rhetoric. In the speech a strangely accented Obama is peddling the Marxist/Racist rhetoric so familiar to men like Jeremiah Wright, who denies that Jesus is God or that the Bible is the Word of God, but the problem is that this is not the “Obama” being sold to the American voters by the Progressive Media.

In the sermon, Obama refers to America’s “tragic history” regarding race and says that Hurricane Katrina opened the curtain to “what had been going on” for a long time, implying racism.

Hannity, on his show, plays samples from both the well-known Obama Race Speech that the media hailed as “historic” and the original race speech he did on this video in which he sounds totally different as a if a typical race-baiting conspiracy theorist. In fact, if the audience was White his speech would come across as White Supremacism.

Tucker Carlson believes Obama is saying “the Federal Government doesn’t like you because you’re Black” and accuses Obama of pandering and playing a “role”. He believes that when you look at these two speeches that “in at least one of them” Obama is playing a role to pander to the office- bad no matter how you slice it.

His speech essentially blames all of the problems in the Black Community on racism. He also talks about the Iraq war as a failure and says “it is time for us to end this war in Iraq.”

The speech was performed after Reverend White was dis-invited from speaking at the announcement of Obama’s candidacy, even AFTER Obama allegedly disavowed his hateful rhetoric. Far from disavowing it, in this sermon Obama mimics his language and praises him. The difference between the speech in California and the speech in Philadelphia is extremely stark, it;s as if there are two different “Obamas”.

A few lines from the speech plastered on Drudge:

‘Need help with basic skills, how to shop, how to show up for work on time, how to wear the right clothes, how to act appropriately in an office’..

‘We don’t need to build more highways out in the suburbs. We should be investing in minority-owned businesses, in our neighborhoods’…

The video was obtained by The Daily Caller and is being released via Sean Hannity on Fox News. A full version is being made available on The Daily Caller.

Obama refers to the Blacks in the room as “our People”, drawing a line of division between Black and non-Black Ameericans.

Excerpts we believe from the speech:
Obama on Pastor Jeremiah Wright-

Obama’s ‘scrubbed speech’

Romney Trounces Obama At Debate

W R Collier Jr October 4, 2012

The first presidential debate of 2012 was an overwhelming victory for Mitt Romney, so say most of the media and around 2/3rds of debate watchers.

This is bad news for the Progressives when you consider that up to 60 million Americans watched the debate. A focus group run by pollster Frank Luntz consisted of “undecided voters” who had voted for Obama in 2008- of the entire panel only 3 remained Obama supporters. If this focus group is indicative of the whole populace, Obama persuaded many or most undecided voters to swing towards Romney.

Romney stuck with a theme based on the idea that Obama’s plans are all “trickle down government”, effectively nuetralizing the “trickle down economics” argument. Romney knocked it out of the park when he complained about Obama’s spending $90 billion on “green energy”: Romney said that Obama puts his money where his heart is and that the $90 billion could have gone for 2 million teachers. This after Obama accused Romney of being “for less teachers”.

At one point a flustered Obama asked Jim Lehrer, the moderator, to “move on to another subject”, a line likely to be used in ads against him.

Obama’s supporters turned against him, shocked and dismayed at his performance. For four years Obama has been shielded from tough questions and face-to-face challenges to his rhetoric. In countless “interviews” Obama’s media supporters focus on making the President look good while reserving the “gotchya” questions for Republicans only. While this has confused the populace who are not aware of the ooposition’s responses to the Progressive meme, in this debate that meme was fairly exposed and challenged by Romney.

The debate will be a factor in this election, altough how much of a factor it will be has yet to be determines, and that can only be good for Romney.

Posted from WordPress for Android

Iran Nukes- The Real Target

W R Collier Jr October 3, 2012

Who Is REALLY Endangered By Iran Nukes- Surprising Answer

William Collier- World Intel Analysis- When my wife asked me “what would happen if Iran nuked Israel” it set off a series of question which left me with surprising answers.

I began to run down the scenarior of an Iranian nuclear attack on Israel and what I found was that there simply was no location where dropping a nuclear weapon on Israel favored the Iranian objectives. Anywhere such a weapon is dropped the resulting damage and fallout would severely hurt the Arab/Muslim populations nearby. Moreover, Jerusalem would be contaminated with radiation no matter where such a weapon was released in Israel.

Of course, that may not stop Iran’s psychopathic rulers from taking such an action, but it does pose an interesting question- if Israel is not really a viable target for Iranian nuclear weapons, WHO is?

It is clear that Iran IS building nuclear weapons. Anyone who doubts this is just not a serious, thinking person regarding world affairs.

If Israel is not the target directly, it is certainly the target of the nuclear program indirectly. There are targets that Iran would want to hit in order to isolate Israel and prepare the battlefield, as it were, for a more conventional attack. Iranian forces are already in Syria and are possibly moving into Lebanon.

Who then would be the target?

I propose two such targets- the straits of Hormuz or, more properly, the US and Allied naval forces there, and Europe itself.

The idea is to attack some strategic spot in Europe OR use the threat of a nuclear attack to compell the Europeans to sit on the sidelines in the case of a general Jihad against Israel. Never mind that European nations and their ally, the US, have the ability to respond in kind: the Iranian strategic concept is not based on the traditional calculus of a “winnable war”.

Iran’s leaders believe that their unleashing of a general war will bring out the “Mahdi”, a mythic figure who will come at the end of the ages to usher in a global Jihad culminating in a global Islamic caliphate. Their calculus is not based on a balance of forces that shows they would eventually have to lose, all they are concerned with is succesfully starting such a war that they believe this “Mahdi” will finish.

It is ironic that Israel is most determined to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon while Europe and US forces in the Middle East are more likely targets of such a weapon than Israel.

Posted from WordPress for Android

AP Breathlessly Defames Voter ID Law

W R Collier Jr September 26, 2012

Playing to fear and using rank supposition, The Associated Press ran an article today claiming that Voter ID Laws will potential cause “chaos” if the 2012 election is close. The reportage of the peice ignores the very real fraude being perpetuated by an election process that pretty much makes it a cake walk to “vote early and vote often.” While you have to have a valid ID to fly and do many other activities, including collecting benefits from the government, vote fraude perpetrators deny the need to ensure that people who vote have a legitimate right to vote. In many locales run by party machines, places like Philadaelphia for instance, it is all too common to see more votes counted then there are voters. Vote fraude deniers never take this obvious and glaring red flag into account. One suspects that illegal votes can give candidates around a 5% or more advantage over their opponents. The AP is complicit in this process and should be disclosing its so-called “reporting” as an “in kind” campaign contribution to the party they favor. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_NEVER_ENDING_ELECTION?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-09-26-03-49-18

Posted from WordPress for Android

Totally Skewed Polls

W R Collier Jr September 25, 2012

Over at UnSkewedPolls.com they’ve uncovered what amounts to a major, smoking gun story of betrayal, lies, and just plain malpractice.

With precision and overwhelming evidence UnSkewedPolls.com has revealed how the Progressive Media are skewing polling data, often by as much as 15 points, to give Obama the appearance of inevitable victory.

All of this is designed to demoralize your opponent, energize your base, and discourage donors from supporting the opponent. The funny thing is, these media outlets aren’t the campaign, although they are acting as if they are, and not disclosing these “in kind” campaign donations. This kind of bias might explain recent findings about the media’s plummeting credibility- over 60% view the media as untrustworthy, according to Gallup, with the partisan divide being rather stark.

We’ve queried among the inside-the-beltway types we know about this and, not surprising, they tend to believe the media and take a rather jaded view of the veracity of this polling analysis. Some internal polling we are aware of seems to back up UnSkewedPolling.com’s take on matters, but to the insiders this is all just “wishful thinking.”

Election day will prove whether this new polling analysis is useful or not, although we understand the new site will be launching its own internet-based weighted polling data using the 2010 election and party affiliation as its baseline.

Posted from WordPress for Android

Pawlenty says third place at Ames not that important if winners aren’t seen as ‘credible’

Freedomist Curator August 9, 2011

In what looked like a veiled shot at Michele Bachmann and Ron Paul, Tim Pawlenty told reporters Monday that while he might not win the upcoming Ames straw poll, its significance in the grand scheme of things could be undercut if the winners are not seen as “credible” candidates.

Read Here
Pawlenty says third place at Ames not that important if winners aren’t seen as ‘credible’

Michele Bachmann: Tea Party Incarnate

Freedomist Curator August 8, 2011

With Iowa’s Ames Straw Poll coming up on Saturday, Tea Party darling Michele Bachmann is glowing in the spotlight of two prominent magazine profiles. This week’s New Yorker and Newsweek ground their portraits of Bachmann in the emotional connection she makes with audiences on the stump. As Newsweek put it, “when others meandered or waffled, she shot back with answers that reduced Washington’s …

Read Here
Michele Bachmann: Tea Party Incarnate