Christian News
David Wilkerson, the man best known for writing the autobiographical book, THE CROSS AND THE SWITCHBLADE, and also the founder of the worldwide Christian Outreach ministry for youth, TEEN CHALLENGE, was killed instantly today in a car crash in Texas. He had recently moved to Texas, where he lived for the last 13 months. He leaves behind four adult children, two sons and two daughters.
Details of the accident are not yet available, but THE FREEDOMIST has learned that his wife, Gwen, has been life-lifted to a hospital in critical condition. THE FREEDOMIST asks our readers to pray for Gwen and the Family of David Wilkerson that must now come to grips with this sudden and terrible loss.
We will update this story as we get more information.
We remember David Wilkerson for his stunning message he delivered not too long ago about the state of Christian America, the state of the Kingdom of God, A CALL TO ANGUISH, which we encourage our readers to listen to again, and remember a great man who left a powerful legacy in the lives of thousands, if not millions.
Christian News- Anguish- David Wilkerson audio- commentary- Paul Collier
For my fellow Christians, I call on you to repent for letting the kingdom fall to ruins. I call on you to know anguish, the anguish of death, the anguish of lost souls. Then I call on you take your place at the wall, and rebuild.
For my fellow Freedomists, I call on you to repent for letting this nation be ruined by corruption, concentrations of power, and the silence that followed Kelo v New London, where the Supreme Court granted powers of the land to any government that chose to take it.
More on David Wilkerson’s life: from wikipedia
Wilkerson served as a pastor in small churches in Scottdale and Philipsburg, Pennsylvania, until he saw a photograph in Life Magazine in 1958 of seven New York City teenagers charged with murder. He later wrote that as he felt the Holy Spirit move him with compassion, he was drawn to go to New York in February 1958. It was then that he began his street ministry.
Wilkerson is well-known for these early years of his ministry to young drug addicts and gang members in New York City in the 1950s and 1960s. He co-authored a book with John and Elizabeth Sherrill about his work with the New York drug addicts, The Cross and the Switchblade, which became a best-seller. Included in the book is the story of the conversion of gang member Nicky Cruz, who later wrote the autobiographical Run Baby Run about his own life. The Cross and the Switchblade has sold over 50 million copies in over thirty languages since it was published in 1963. In 1970, a Hollywood movie based on the book starred Pat Boone as Wilkerson and Erik Estrada as Cruz. The book was included on Christianity Today’s “The Top 50 Books That Have Shaped Evangelicals” [1]
In 1958, Wilkerson founded Teen Challenge, an evangelical Christian recovery program and a network of Christian social and evangelizing work centers.[2] In 1967, Wilkerson began Youth Crusades, an evangelistic ministry aimed at teenagers whom Wilkerson called “goodniks” — middle-class youth who were restless and bored. His goal was to prevent them from becoming heavily involved with drugs, alcohol, or violence. Through this ministry, the CURE Corps (Collegiate Urban Renewal Effort) was founded. It was intended to be something of a Christian version of the Peace Corps and Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA).
In 1971, Wilkerson moved his ministry headquarters to Lindale, Texas, where he founded World Challenge, an organization whose mission is to promote and spread the Gospel throughout the world.
In 1986, while walking down 42nd Street in New York City at midnight, Wilkerson believes that the Holy Spirit called him to return to New York City and to raise up a ministry in Times Square. This resulted in the establishment of Times Square Church, which opened its doors in October 1987. The church first occupied rented auditoriums in Times Square (Town Hall and the Nederlander Theater), later moving to the historic Mark Hellinger Theatre, which the ministry purchased in 1989 and in which it has operated ever since.
Since the 1990s, Wilkerson has focused his efforts to encourage pastors and their families throughout the world to “renew their passion for Christ”. In his own words:
“I’ve been an evangelist for 50 years, but I didn’t want to preach to pastors until I had gray hair, until I’d pastored. Now after 15 years of pastoring, sharing the hurts, pains, and difficulties of the ministry as a pastor, I felt the Lord finally release me, that I might have something to say
Faith Freedom, American Freedom, Freedom Watch, Freedom Action
It is TIME For A “Freedom Uprising” In America!- Bill Collier, Freedomist
The battle for our country’s future is being fought in the streets, but the forces for freedom are being out-spent and out-fought by the Progressives who have the unions, big money from men like George Soros, and journolist media led by the likes of Michael Moore. Bloggers and new media providers can inspire and educate people to form their own local “Freedom Corps” made up of people who attend street events (protests, counter protests, demonstrations, rallies) and people who donate to help support those who go to these events.
—————————–
NOTE- If you own a blog or website and are interested in this idea, drop me a line at [email protected] and let me know. If I get more than a dozen responses, I will set up a phone conference, share my ideas, hear YOUR ideas, and between us, we can all decide what to do next. If I don’t get more than a dozen responses, I’ll take that as a sign that “our side” is just NOT yet ready to work together.
—————————–
WE ARE BEING BEATEN ON THE STREETS- In Wisconsin, the GOP stands to lose their recent gains because the Progressives are on the streets and the airwaves with their lies and smears against the governor and the GOP in general. In New York, Progressives and their Pan-Islamic allies are banging the drums for multiculturalism gone amok over legitimate inquiries by Representative Steve King over the emergence of Pan-Islam in America.
Of course the journolist media uses images of large crowds of these paid protestors to paint a picture as if those who are not with the protestors are in the majority.
The Progressives have a central command structure, lots of money, control over the journolist media, and armies of mindless drones who will do and say whatever their paymasters want them to do and say.
NO COMPLAINING WILL HELP US- We can talk about how we think they have some unfair advantages, how they use taxpayer dollars or how they use discrimination to gain control over institutions but none of that is going to help us.
In the end, we need to find a way to marshal superior numbers and more effectively reach out to the public with our message, a message which must be truthful, simple, direct, and repeated often.
What can we do as information providers, writers, bloggers, and new media professionals?
We have the power of instigating ideas into becoming a reality.
This means that if we all create a picture of a possible future, where our side outflanks the opposition on the streets and in the LOCAL media, that activists will pick up those ideas and use them.
This is the way Tea Parties got started.
A few individuals saw Rick Santelli, decided he had the right idea, and started to make noise about it.
I was on some of those conference calls and one of the things we talked about was the need for a nationwide effort that was not controlled from the center. We beat the drum, using our blogs or networks (I promoted things via Freedomist and through Team Sarah), and where possible we lent our resources to help (we own localteaparties.com and taxdayteaparty.org which we used to simply provide information.)
We need to go beyond the Tea Parties to create locally controlled groups of people who will hit the streets when the opposition is hitting the streets, and we need to encourage them to cooperate and coordinate when major nationwide efforts are needed.
On April 4th the Progressives plan something like a “day of rage” for Government Unions. We need bigger numbers to show up and make a visible showing for the People.
These Progressive robots who go out and rally for socialism, under some other disguise, have the advantage of being able to get paid to protest.
Our side needs to encourage employers to let people participate without losing pay, we need to encourage people who can’t attend to donate a little money to help pay for buses, food, supplies to help those who can attend these events.
WE MUST ASSUME PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR INSTIGATING NEW IDEAS- In short, we need to provide ideas and a blueprint, write about them, link to each other, and even coordinate together to hold phone conferences where we can talk about ideas for organizing and invite would-be organizers to attend. Let them set up their own groups and run with the idea, we can simply fade into the background, having done our job.
ONE MAIN IDEA, ONE AGREED UPON NAME- We need a single name for this, and I don’t think “Tea Parties” is the name. Tea Parties will likely sponsor it, and organize it, but this needs its own name.
I propose the name “Freedom Corps” as the name for these local groups of 100-200 participants (people who GO to events) and at least another 200-300 “supporters”, people who pledge to pitch in $10-$50 per event to help offset any costs for buses, lodging, food, and etc. to support the participants.
Of course, larger scale organizing will naturally occur as local groups exchange ideas, coordinate, and decide on a shared structure to plan and organize large scale events. This will continue upwards until a national network of sorts is in place, rising from below (not imposed from above).
OUR ROLE IS TO INSTIGATE AND BACK OFF- Our role, as writers and new media providers, is not so much to organize these groups as to bang the drums on their need and provide ideas for what they should do and how local people might organize themselves to form such groups. If people surf the web and see the freedom corps idea referred to over and over again, they will want to participate.
WE CAN ALL SHARE THE BURDEN- Between us, we can all pitch in on the information side. Each of us might take a part of the country and host an information page where people in those parts can input meeting information or contact information. A shared domain could be used to host a map which you click on to find local information. When people click on an area, it takes them to a page hosted by one of us, which has a way for people to see current information and input new information.
We could also create a twitter group and a hashtag to share information, a facebook page and group, and yahoo groups for mailing lists by region so people can talk to people in their area. This could also be shared work with each of us taking charge of groups or being “on duty” to man the main twitter account to ensure that information is flowing 24-7 during an event (this means that all participants have access to that account.)
NO “ORGANIZATION” NEEDED!- None of this requires an organization, none of us “own” it, and any donations would be made to LOCAL groups who could then share their resources if they join with other local groups to form regional or state networks.
Reagan once said that if you want to get things done, don’t take credit for things. Most of the people who beat the drum and initially pushed the idea for Tea Parties are unknown. It was never intended for it to be otherwise.
WE HAVE THE POWER TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN- If we can encourage people and inspire them, and if we can motivate them and even educate them, and then disappear, that is all fine and well. Our job is not to organize and lead, per se, but, rather, to beat the drum, facilitate things, and then let the participants take over and do their thing.
If people see all of the writers, news suites, and blogs that are pro-Freedom all writing and talking about the SAME BASIC IDEA, then they will feel more confident that it may work and want to participate in it.
DON’T FRUSTRATE THE PEOPLE!- On the other hand, if people see all these blogs, web pages, and news sites all touting THEIR OWN idea, that they want to own, all with different approaches, many of which are contradictory, then they will become bogged down, confused, and they will lose confidence.
ONE VOICE ON A LIMITED SCALE- We need to start finding ways, at least on a limited scale, to speak with ONE VOICE, or the opposition will beat us EVERY TIME. If we cannot do amongst ourselves what we want our elected leaders to do, then what right do we have to demand of them that which we refuse to do ourselves?
ARE WE READY TO WORK TOGETHER? If you own a blog or website and are interested in this idea, drop me a line at [email protected] and let me know. If I get more than a dozen responses, I will set up a phone conference, share my ideas, hear YOUR ideas, and between us, we can all decide what to do next. If I don’t get more than a dozen responses, I’ll take that as a sign that “our side” is just NOT yet ready to work together.
Bill Collier
Freedomist.com
Wisconsin Teachers Protest, Wisconsin news, Wisconsin Teachers Protest
UPDATE:
Freedom Mobs Against Union Mobs Called For By The Freedomist
The Freedomist is putting out a call to freedom-minded Americans to oppose the Union mobs that are attempting to silence the voice of the People.
Union mobs are being unleashed, with the coordination and assistance of the Obama regime, in order to block efforts to reign in their power and the excessive costs they cause by their mob-like intimidation tactics. Unions are also responsible for coarsening the political discourse, ramming through anti-Christian social policies, and creating a “politically correct” atmosphere in favor of secular socialism. Freedom through godliness, self-reliance, and self-determination is not consistent with the secular socialist Union agenda and the People’s Democracy is not compatible with the Union’s mobocracy.
Bluegrass Pundit: Obama’s Organizing for America Instigating …
When you pull back the curtain on teacher protests in Wisconsin, you find Barack Obama’s Organizing for America has been busy.
(Politico)– The Democratic National Committee’s Organizing for America arm — the remnant of the 2008 Obama campaign — is playing an active role in organizing protests against Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s attempt to strip most public employees of collective bargaining rights.
OfA, as the campaign group is known, has been criticized at times for staying out of local issues like same-sex marraige, but it’s riding to the aide of the public sector unions who hoping to persuade some Republican legislators to oppose Walker’s plan. And while Obama may have his difference with teachers unions, OfA’s engagement with the fight — and Obama’s own clear stance against Walker — mean that he’s remaining loyal to key Democratic Party allies at what is, for them, a very dangerous moment.
As an example, employees nationwide paid 13%~27% (see page 5) of the cost of their employer sponsored health care. Wisconsin teachers currently pay only 4%~6%.
Northwoods Patriots: ORGANIZING FOR AMERICA IS ORGANIZING IN MADISON
Dan Grandone, Organizing for America State/Local – Monday, February 14, 2011
MADISON, WI – We always knew Scott Walker would pursue a right-wing, anti-worker agenda. We didn’t know it would be this extreme.At a time when most folks are still struggling to get back on their feet, Gov. Walker has asked the state legislature to strip public employees of their collective bargaining rights. Under his plan, park rangers, teachers, and prison guards would no longer be able to fight back if the new Republican majority tries to slash their health benefits or pensions.But that’s not even the most shocking part: The governor has also put the state National Guard on alert in case of “labor unrest.”We can’t — and won’t — let Scott Walker’s heavy-handed tactics scare us. This Tuesday and Wednesday, February 15th and 16th, volunteers will be attending rallies at the state capitol, put together by our organized labor allies. The vote could come as early as Wednesday, and we need to speak out now to show lawmakers in Madison that we’re not only paying attention; we’re fired up and ready to act.
State Employee Unions Attack Capitol
The Wisconsin state government is under siege by radical progressive fundamentalists seeking public largesse for state employees at taxpayer expense. Using the phraseology of democracy, freedom, liberty, and revolution., the state employee’s unions are working to prevent the democratically elected government from enacting fiscal reforms designed to get the state’s excessive state employee expenses under some semblance of control.
While the Progressive journolist media spins this organized assault on democracy as a “popular uprising” many in Wisconsin are seeing in it an exposure of the true nature of the teachers and their union: that they are radical Progressives whose vision for America is based on the concepts of central planning elites redistributing wealth from producers to people who mindlessly vote for the Party and the over-paid and under-accountable state employees who rely on their votes to keep their “programs” in operation.
A counter-demonstration, which could potentially lead to violence as the Progressive extremists are already threatening violence and have already carried out acts of sabatoge and vandalism on state property, is being planned by numerous groups. Many, however, are considering just driving to the State capital themselves to confront what they see as a manufactured, astro-turf effort to impose the will of the Unions OVER and against the expressed will of the People.
The regime of Progressive domination through discrimination, intimidation, and deception is being challenged like never before and now the Progressives are appealing to rule of a mob, incited and hired by a few elites, to shout down and assault any opponents. Activists for Freedom who recognize in teacher’s unions an institution that is totally given over to the radical Progressive agenda for an America under a one-party secular welfare state (the People’s will be damned), are organizing and mobilizing and may be showing up on site in the next few hours or sometime tomorrow.
The scope of the Progressive insurgency and its sudden appearance may have surprised some, but it is also evidence in and of itself of its premeditation by Progressive elite leaders who are using these contrived mobs as weapons against the People’s will in Wisconsin. What is potentially being set up, with the Obama regime sticking its Progressive nose into the State’s affairs is a mini-civil war between freedom minded citizens and Progressive elite and their plantation denizens, namely public employees who care more for their own life of ease than the very fiscal survival of their state.
From inside the state capital this alert:
THE POLICE HAVE ADVISED THAT WE LOCK OUR DOORS.
GROUPS OF YOUNG KIDS ARE MARCHING THROUGH THE HALLS YELLING AT THE TOP OF THEIR LUNGS….DRUMS ARE BANGING, ETC.
RESTROOMS ARE BLOCKADED. VANDALISM YESTERDAY.
ELEVATORS ARE BLOCKADED.
ANGRY CROWDS ARE POUNDING ON OUR GLASS WINDOWS.
PLEASE, PLEASE PRAY FOR OUR STATE.
There is no more news from this source, however such reports are coming in such numbers as to suggest a systematic assault is under way aimed at nothing less than a Progressive hostile takeover of the State Government.
Citizens of Wisconsin are called upon to go to the capital to DEFEND THE PEOPLE’S DEMOCRACY from the Progressive revolution that is under way, with Obama’s support!
Obama has called the bill to limit the Union’s ability to hold taxpayers at gunpoint and force concessions “an assault on unions”, to which some respond, “assaulting Unions is a good thing, they are not much more than a cancer on the American economy and a detriment to true democracy!”
more on Wisconsin Teachers Protest:
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/02/17/the-historical-illiteracy-of-wisconsin-teachers/
Godwin’s Law states that any political argument, carried on long enough, will eventually provoke a Nazi reference. My own personal corollary to Godwin’s Law is that the first side to invoke it invariably loses, mainly because Nazis and Adolf Hitler are simply not analogous to normal politics in American democracy, unless one is discussing actual neo-Nazis. It exposes a clear lack of historical literacy about the Nazis and the history between the two World Wars of the last century. It’s the kind of argument favored by the relatively uneducated.
That’s what makes the protests in Wisconsin over Governor Scott Walker’s proposal to curtail the power of public-sector unions so deliciously ironic. Hot Air reader Tim R in Madison took his camera with him when he attended the large protests staged by the teachers against the budget bill that would require contributions for pensions and health insurance, as well as put new curbs on collective bargaining. Tim discovered signs like this at the protest yesterday at 6 pm just after the speakers concluded:
from http://www.samchaltain.com/the-wisconsin-teachers-protest-two-wrongs-dont-make-a-right
As school systems across the state of Wisconsin cancel another day of classes – the result of massive protests in Madison following Governor Scott Walker’s effort to strip educators of the bulk of their collective bargaining rights — I can’t help but think of the old adage that two wrongs don’t make a right.
The first wrong is how teacher unions have come to operate. Clearly, unions need to reinvent themselves if they want to remain viable in the 21st century, and old-school policies like “last in, first out” (LIFO) and the fact that in many places it’s almost impossible to fire a bad teacher don’t serve anyone’s best interests. We can do better.
from http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/wisconsin-teachers-take-students-class-protest_550230.html
Teachers and students in Wisconsin are protesting Governor Scott Walker’s budget bill. But it’s not a mark of democracy: instead, teachers have been taking kids out of school to march on the Capitol in Madison. It’s being called a “sickout” — and it’s illegal.
Here’s footage of the students in action (courtesy of the MacIver Institute):
The Wisconsin teachers union is going all out, or maybe all in is the better term, to try and stop needed reforms. Are they totally oblivious to what’s going on in the country, what happened last November? I can’t believe they are that dense, but in fact, there is a really good reason for their response. .The union’s survival is threatened. Here’s the numbers.
According to the Weekly Standard, the average Wisconsin teacher’s salary ( not including benefits) is $50,000. The cost of the proposed contributions to the retirement and medical plans will be 5%..let’s say $2,500. And because these contributions will be on a BEFORE-TAX basis, let’s assume the out-of pocket (after-tax) cost will then be $2,000/year.
Union dues are $1,100. And under the proposal, teachers will no longer be required to join the union. So..to the teacher now facing a $2,000/year reduction in take home pay..where’s the easiest, most obvious place to cut..Why, of course..union dues.
More on Wisconsin Teacher Protests from the blogosphere:
The historical illiteracy of Wisconsin teachers « Hot Air
From what we’ve seen of these protests, the entire state of Wisconsin is in need of quality teachers, and it looks like the union is the biggest impediment to getting them. Meanwhile, Democrats in the Wisconsin Senate …
Wisconsin Senators Dodge Vote On Defined Contribution Bill …
Wisconsin Senators Dodge Vote On Defined Contribution Bill, Teachers Protest. By Kurtis Workman on February 17, 2011 at 02:12 pm. Share |. Wisconsin is attempting to change the benefit structure for teachers and that …http://plainsdaily.com/
Wisconsin Teachers Pull Students From School for Protest | The …
Here’s video of high school students who were brought to a protest at the Wisconsin capitol by their illegally striking teachers.
Extra credit? Teachers take Wisconsin students to protest state …
Students from Madison’s East High School claim their teachers brought them to the Wisconsin union protests against Scott Walker’s collective bargaining plan.
Michelle Malkin » Watch Wisconsin, Part II: Union thugs scream at …
Watch Wisconsin, Part II: Union thugs scream at “Hosni Walker/”Mubarak of the Midwest;” striking teachers tote students to protest.
Bill Collier
The rapid and surprising fall of Tunisia, the sudden reversal of the Sudanese government’s hold over the south (allowing for the free vote of southern Sudanese for independence), the riots in Egypt and now Yemen, the simmering opposition in Iran, the re-emerging insurgency in Iraq, the unrest in Pakistan, the ongoing insurgency in Afghanistan, and the emerging opposition in Lebanon to a Hezbollah take-over of the country are all signs pointing to widespread discontent in the Middle East and throughout the Arab and Muslim world or Islamic Civilization.
Freedom will out.
This means that the aspiration for freedom that is such a part of the human condition will rise to the surface and lead people at times to flee or to rebel.
On the other hand, the forces of total-control which envision a strong government as the head and master of all things, with total political regulation and control over all things in life, are always seeking to counter and suppress this drive for freedom.
What we are witnessing in the Islamic Civilization is a clash between these two forces; the natural thirst for human freedom, which for women and non-Muslims especially is in such contradiction to the way most non-Western Muslim clerics interpret the Holy Writ of their faith, and the forces of total-control which see government as the vehicle for an imposed religious ideology as a vision for society and “solution” to their problems.
The thirst for Freedom is imperfect and often in seeking freedom people choose snake oil cures sold by crafty demagogues or prophets and wind up without gaining freedom despite strenuous efforts and sacrifices.
While Islamic Civilization is indeed in a phase of imperialistic expansion, seeking to conquer new territories and bring more people under the dominion of its religious ideology, it is also essentially at war with itself. On one hand, differing versions of the thirst for freedom and on the other the Sunni and Shia visions of the total-government implementation of their “solutions” to the problems they face in the form of a religious ideology.
It is difficult for us, on the outside, to classify these events on an individual basis as being this or that version of total-government or this or that version of freedom-seeking.
In Egypt, for instance, one sees total-government seekers like the Muslim Brotherhood seeming to join with freedom-seeking students and Coptic Christians in one single uprising against the Mubarrak dictatorship.
Is this one event a total-government seeking event by radicals against a comparatively religiously moderate regime or a freedom-seeking event against total-government in general? For some protestors it is an effort to move towards a more radical form of total-government and for others it is a move towards more freedom and less government in general.
It is in times like these that governments under threat look for scapegoats.
The Iranian government, while its leaders genuinely hate Israel and the West as part of their radical Shia Islamic faith, is using external foes to distract its populace from the internal situation which so many find distasteful and which they increasingly oppose. The attempted Iranian take-over of Lebanon, which some see as near completion, is but another gambit in an overall campaign to find external scapegoats and make their own people drop their opposition to the regime.
As this winter of discontent potentially become a spring uprising governments under pressure will look to a scapegoat, and that scapegoat for the Islamic civilization is now the Jew and the Jewish state. Indeed, if Israel did not exist as the Pan-Islamic bogeyman to keep the populace from thinking too much about the failure of their own governments, it would have to be invented.
The fact is that most of the disputes the nations and peoples of the Islamic civilization have with the non-Islamic world are contrived inventions by a ruling elite meant to make oppressed women and minorities and poor, exploited workers and peasants forget the real source of their misery- their own governments and the religious ideologies those governments follow.
To say that Sharia law is to the 21st century what the Communist Manifesto was to the 20th century (and remains in some circles as well as China) is not entirely off-base. Sharia law, whether Sunni or Shia, is a total-government approach to a pan-Islamic religious ideology that enslaves and oppresses human beings, robbing them first of their rights, persons, and property and then of their dignity.
Today, the Islamic Civilization, almost across the board, is facing its own potential demise as the impetus for freedom clashes with the total-government religious ideologies that dominate most Islamic nations today. This does not mean that this civilization will collapse, but it does mean that the governments of Islamic nations will increasingly oppress their own people while going out to find external scapegoats, making them, at best, unpleasant neighbors.
Relativism, Multiculturalism, and Drugs Led To Gifford Shooting
The triple crown of liberalism is relativism as opposd to absolute truth, multiculturalism as opposed to tradition and virtue, and self-indulgence (in the form of drug use) as opposed to self-discipline. Is this what led to the shooting in Tucson, Arizona?
Thanks to the tenets of relativism, the Arizona man who tried to murder a member of Congress, and who murdered 6 others, including a 9 year old girl, was able to imbibe in the worse possible ideologies without any real social constraints on such thinking or context.
Was the shooter’s avowed love of Karl Marx or of Mein Kampf, both manuals for totalitarianism, questioned or were his studies of these writings put within the context of writings of our Founders or the Bible? In our present culture, imposed as it is from above, he would not have received such instruction that might have dissuaded him from embracing the hatefulness of Marx and Hitler.
When the murderous young man was rejecting a culture of life and love and justice, would this present imposed culture have provided any context or social pressure to dissuade him from his chosen path? No, the multiculturalists don’t believe in any kind of “judgment” of “other cultures”, just like they refuse to “judge” the pan-Islamic culture of Jihadism and intolerance.
Finally, the murderer was imbibing in mind-altering drugs, the kind that many want to see made illegal, the kind that many like to say are harmless. Marijuana, possibly cut with other chemical substances, gave the shooter the drive, the daring, and the twisted beliefs that allowed him to grab a weapon and murder other people.
Today, as America stands in shock and anger, hard questions need to be asked about America’s illicit affair with relativism, multiculturalism, and drugs. The left is to blame for these kinds of things, the left is ultimately the first cause of this kind of shooting.
Perhaps this is the reason why the left, knowing how their idolatrous love for such things is the root cause here, tried to hang the label “Tea Party” around this young murderer’s neck.
UPDATE- 1-12-11-
Notes on Jared
The blood libel meets a wall of truth, shows the true anti-freedomist and regressive agenda of Sheriff Dubnik, Freedom’s own “Benedict Arnold”, a Quisling pretender whose own oath of office was violated when he tried to spread a blood libel as a Rechstag fire justification for censoring his freedomist oponents.
“He did not watch TV. He disliked the news. He didn’t listen to political radio. He didn’t take sides. He wasn’t on the left. He wasn’t on the right.”
Zach Osler, a high school friend of Jared Loughner, the suspect in the Tucson massacre.
Dubnik is being joined by other Quislings, including the governor or Rhode Islamnd who is banning officials from speaking on talk radio in a blatant attempt to restrict access to public officials to only progressive journolist news media outlets.
“Chafee doesn’t plan to spend his own time on talk radio, and he intends to ban state employees from spending their state work time talking on talk radio, which was Carcieri’s favorite medium and an integral part of his communications operation.”
Soure: http://www.projo.com/news/content/CHAFEE_TALK_RADIO_01-11-11_1TLTC0P_v11.428bc2.html#
[formidable id=5 title=true description=true]
Freedom News, Politics, Conservative News, Tea Party News, Constitution Watch, Freedom Report, Bill Collier
American Founders’ Prescience Continues To Serve Us
Bill Collier- Freedomist.com
The prescience of our founders speaks strongly to a 21st century rebirth of populism and the necessary demise of the warfare-welfare state of the 20th century.
“The way to have safe government is not to trust it all to the one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to everyone exactly the functions in which he is competent….To let the National Government be entrusted with the defense of the nation, and its foreign and federal relations….. The State Governments with the Civil Rights, Laws, Police and administration of what concerns the State generally. The Counties with the local concerns, and each ward direct the interests within itself. It is by dividing and subdividing these Republics from the great national one down through all its subordinations until it ends in the administration of everyman’s farm by himself, by placing under everyone what his own eye may superintend, that all will be done for the best.” Thomas Jefferson
The notion that the courts can use the commerce clause to excuse excesses of Federal power beyond this simple vision of a strictly limited government is a outright betrayal of the intention of the founders.
“Government is not reason; it is not eloquence. It is force. And force, like fire, is a dangerous servant and a fearful master. ” George Washington
Simple truth like this is so lacking from the mouths of our scholars and the Journolist media who want us to see government as elegance and kindness, as something warm and paternal.
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves. ” William Pitt in the House of Commons November 18, 1783
How often have we been told by radical Progressives and the Journolist media of some “necessity”- the bailouts, the TSA molestations, and on and on all pushed over our civil rights by the “necessity” of the hour!
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.”
Patrick Henry
How can anyone read, for instance, the 1st Amendment as a prohibition on the free exercise of religious bodies in ALL aspects of our public life, including political, if the Constitution is meant ONLY to LIMIT and constrain government rather than the private associations of the People?
“Those rights, then, which God and nature have established, and are therefore called natural rights, such as are life and liberty, need not the aid of human laws to be more effectually invested in every man than they are; neither do they receive any additional strength when declared by the municipal [or state] laws to be inviolable. On the contrary, no human legislation has power to abridge or destroy them, unless the owner [of the right] shall himself commit some act that amounts to a forfeiture.” – William Blackstone
In short, we don’t need legal mumbo jumbo or endless debates about this or that “provision” or law or the like in order to claim, assert, or practice our natural, God-given freedom to be secure in our rights, persons, and property.
“The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found only in the Holy Scriptures. These precepts, when revealed, are found by comparison to be really a part of the original law of nature, as they tend in all their consequences to man’s felicity.” – William Blackstone
If the Holy Scriptures and their ancient precepts are true, we should follow them, and those who deny them cannot simply say “we shouldn’t follow this because it is religious in its roots” but, rather, they have the burden, as the accusers, to prove that such precept are guilty of being wrong.
Now, here are some quotes which speak of a freedom that is liberty in our rights, persons, and property within the constraints only of virtue and “the laws of nature and nature’s God.”
“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports…. And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion.” – George Washington
“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.” – Benjamin Franklin
“Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who … will not suffer a man to be chosen into any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man.” – Samuel Adams
Liberty is not license without constraint, nor is it “whatever doesn’t hurt others.” Liberty without virtue, or godliness, is the formula for tyranny because people who have no limits other than their own desire and the desires of people around them are bound to do things that are most harmful to themselves and their society.
“Every man, by consenting with others to make one body politic under one government, puts himself under an obligation to every one of that society to submit to the determination of the majority, and to be concluded [bound] by it.” – John Locke
Think about this. Freedom requires participatory self-government, but once a society has determined its values, natures, and characteristic norms, then one is justly bound to respect that, obey that, or failing this, to leave that society for another.
This theme of liberty within the just and useful limits of godliness (virtue) is almost universal amongst those who wrote our Constitution and whoever chooses to ignore this chooses to ignore the law of the People’s right to rule.
“(T)he foundation of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality; …the propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself has ordained…” George Washington, First Inaugural, April 30 1789
“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. ” John Adams
“Political interest [can] never be separated in the long run from moral right….
Can the liberties of a nation be sure when we remove their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people, that these liberties are a gift from God? ” Thomas Jefferson
And HOW do we secure such freedom rooted in godliness, self-reliance, and security of our rights, persons, and property?
The intent of our Founders was that we protect this freedom ourselves, not that we rely on others, especially government, to be the sole possessors of arms for such defense.
“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes… Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. ” Jefferson’s “Commonplace Book,” 1774_1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764
“When the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually…I ask, who are the militia? They consist of now of the whole people, except a few public officers. But I cannot say who will be the militia of the future day. If that paper on the table gets no alteration, the militia of the future day may not consist of all classes, high and low, and rich and poor…”
George Mason, Virginia Constitution Convention
The Founders even considered the problem of Pan-Islamic Imperialism, or “terrorism” and dealt with it by waging unrestricted warfare on its practitioners, going to North Africa and attacking the “Barbary States.”
In 1786, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson met with Tunisian leaders representing the so-called “Barbary States”, which were pirating the oceans and attacking US merchant ships and taking Americans hostage. This is how they summed up their enemy, and that same enemy exists today, now in a form of Pan-Islamic Imperialism called “terrorism” or “Jihadism.”
“We took the liberty to make some inquiries concerning the Grounds of their pretensions to make war upon a Nation who had done them no Injury, and observed that we considered all mankind as our Friends who had done us no wrong, nor had given us any provocation. The Ambassador answered us that it was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
When you read these and many other quotes like this you might wonder- how would today’s Journolist media and the quisling Progressive radicals in places of high office label our Founders?
Election 2010, 2010 Election Results, Politics, GOP, Constitution, Mandate, Agenda, Bill Collier, Constitutional Mandate
Was 2010 About Ideology Or Weirdness?
The GOP MANDATE For Popular Constitutionalism
Bill Collier
Politicians love to claim a mandate and often use the term “the American People want…” (fill in the blank). This kind of “speechifying”, at its most basic level, is a “polite” way of saying, “I’m right because The People say I’m right!” It doesn’t matter whether, logically or morally, that politician is right, much less whether or not the People who gave that politician the votes to win REALLY support their whole agenda, or even whether the People are simply tossing out the other politicians who disappointed them!
Today, the new majority party for the House and for State governments overall, the GOP, is sounding not much different in its grandiose claims than the old majority party, the Democrats, who still control the Senate and the White House, and most of the media and education establishment.
Did “the American People” choose one set of ideological principles over another in the 2010 mid-term elections?
In Delaware, the “People” surprised even the Freedomist, with our prediction of an upset based on polling data from multiple sources, and chose a crony capitalist who uses “Progressivism” as a cloak for his, well, cronyism, all because the Democrat controlled media used high school popularity contest tactics, essentially calling his opponent, Christine O’Donnell, “weird.”
Did ALL the voters decide to support the crony insider simply because the media made O’Donnell seem “weird”? NO, many of these voters lean to the Progressive side of the aisle and genuinely believe in limited economic freedom in exchange for public guarantees of their welfare and “freedom from morality.” Most of the Coons voters were, in fact, genuinely voting their ideological tendencies, or at least for their own self-interest (for largesse at public expense) but many of them knew nothing more than that O’Donnell was “weird”, because that’s what their local journolist media SAID she was!
Can the same be said on the other side, that voters rejected Democrats, who took a shellacking in the race for the House and the State gubernatorial races, simply because the media portrayed them as “weird?”
The fact is, the progressive journolists portrayed almost the entire Tea Party movement, and as many of the GOP contenders as they COULD, as “weird.” They did not throw one single punch at the other side. It was as if the only “weird” people were on the side of the aisle that thinks excessive government power over our lives and wealth is itself “weird” in relation to Constitutional norms.
It is not weird, according to this model of weirdness, to think that the commerce clause can pretty much mean anything you want, thus nullifying the entire Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Declaration of Independence, but it is weird to think, for instance, that fantasying about having sex with someone you’re not married to is the same thing as adultery.
Can you imagine how the Apostle Paul would be treated by the progressive journolists? TALK ABOUT WEIRD!
Harry Reid would talk about how the Apostle Paul said “those who do not work, should not eat” was “callous and insensitive.”
Nancy Pelosi would read the bit about not being “unequally yoked” with sinners as “extreme.”
Ariana Huffington would read where Paul described homosexuals as “reprobates” as “bigoted homophobia.”
Of course, as with the servant, Paul, so with the Master- Jesus Christ Himself would have been just as easily condemned and crucified for his “crimes” by the progressive journolists and their political allies.
Would the progressive journolists crucify Jesus and the Apostles in the Roman way?
No!
For modern crucifixions see the way the progressive journolists treated Juan Williams and how it treats people like Sharon Angle, Christine O’Donnell, Joe Miller, and Sarah Palin! Not only do the progressive journolists seek to smear the names of their political opponents, and turn people off by portraying these people as being “weird”, but they are not happy until they have DESTROYED their lives!
Some Americans, enough to be move an election loss for an ideologue whose policies would not in and of themselves gain popular support, were persuaded by the “coolness” argument- the other person is weird, therefore not cool, and so vote for the “cool person.” In Delaware, Nevada, and California, this “coolness” argument may have been enough to propel candidates whose ideology is shared by only 20% of the population into the winner’s circle.
On the other hand, were the candidates who WON, and whose ideology is not unpopular, propelled to power on the basis of their ideology?
Let’s think of it like this. If a trend is wide and broad and deep, than we might safely say that there are factors at work other than purely local factors.
The “coolness” argument is always a local factor, because it relates to how cool, or un-cool a particular candidate is. If you say “they’re ALL un-cool because of their ideology” you now have the problem of talking about that ideology, which, if your ideology is not popular, opens you up to having to talk about your ideology.
In 2010 the progressive journolists and their political friends and allies pretty much tried, on a massive scale, the “coolness argument.” They had some successes and probably limited their losses, and may even have saved the Senate for their CLASS of Progressive Elites.
The other side, those who rejected Progressivism, used the “ideological argument.” They tried to remind people of their opponent’s true Progressive ideology, or how they SUPPORTED that ideology by their votes, and they presented their own ideology, which was remarkably similar across the board.
What did they say?
They said their opponent’s shared or would support the ideology of Progressive Elitism, based on the premise of state-controlled and managed “solutions” coupled with some form of freedom FROM morality (especially in the areas we might consider “carnal pleasure”).
Not all of the winners from the Popular Constitutionalist side of the aisle emphasized the social morality aspect of their opponent’s ideology, but almost ALL pointed out the difference between Progressive Elitism (using terms like “liberal” or “elitism”) and the basic and fundamental ASSUMPTIONS and beliefs of the Founders of this nation.
When the Democrats ran the board in 2008, they DID NOT make an ideological argument- they made a sales pitch for all the goodies they were going give and all the beneficial things they were going to do for each special interest group in their coalition, and they exposed the rank hypocrisy of the GOP, while capitalizing on the fact that the core supporters of the GOP were themselves angry with the compromise of their leaders.
THIS WAS NOT THE CASE IN 2010! The election did not see an emphasis on the “promises to make your life better” argument, in fact the GOP almost never promises any government largesse or benefit and rarely if ever uses the “promises” argument!
In West Virginia, the one “win” the Democrats were most excited about was a product of a campaign that switched from the “coolness argument” in a state that was leaning against the Progressive Elitist Ideology, to a purely ideological argument in which the DEMOCRAT in the race claimed to be in 100% accord with the IDEOLOGY of his opponent!
While the Popular Constitutionalists argued against their opponent’s ideology, and while some also used the argument that their opponent was corrupt (this, notably, failed in Delaware and Nevada), almost all emphasized their own ideology for “lower taxes, less government, more economic freedom, and a return to the principles embodied in the nation’s founding documents.”
When progressive journolists SAY that the GOP did not “have a positive message”, what they mean, in their own code language, is that the GOP did not OFFER any “largesse.” The GOP offered an ideology, of Popular Constitutionalism, and, for the progressive journolists, to NOT make promises of largesse is an alien concept- their Progressive Elitism is not anything if it isn’t at least consistent!
For a Popular Constitutionalist, the very idea of running on a campaign of saying what government can do to make your life better seems like something that only the technocrats of the USSR or Chavez’s Venezuela would do! Government, in the Popular Constitutionalism embedded in our founding documents, and in the hearts of millions, sees government as a protector of rights, persons, and property, from all enemies, foreign or domestic, but relies on people, free associations, the free market, and local communities as the nearly SOLE vehicle and platform for meeting real needs and finding and doing what brings you fulfillment and “happiness.”
(We refer to Popular Constitutionalists as “Freedomists”.)
For Popular Constitutionalists the predominating argument was NOT promises or how corrupt the other side was, or the coolness argument. Exceptions do not prove a rule and, while there were exceptions, and notably the exceptions seemed to fail, the rule was that the GOP overall ran an ideological campaign. They made ideology the center of their argument AGAINST their opponent and FOR themselves, and they promised to follow that ideology if elected.
On that score, not very many of the voters who supported the Democrats were responding to the ideology argument made by the Democrats, because that argument was not made, except amongst the already initiated, in places like the Huffington Post or Daily Kos. We estimate that less than 20% of ALL voters OVERALL supported the Democrats on the basis of their agenda while as many as 40% of ALL voters were motivated by the Popular Constitutionalists’ appeal to ideology.
Of all the supporters of the Democrats, perhaps as many as 30% of their voters were driven by ideology and upwards to 10% by Party ID, 10% by race, and 10% by union affiliation with the remaining 30% being driven by the coolness argument or the promises argument. A more scientific analysis is begging to be done, but these are our initial estimates based in voter turnout, exit polling, and looking at the arguments made by the Democratic candidates and progressive journolists, who overtly appealed to party ID, race, union affiliation, the coolness argument, and the promises argument.
What then of the Popular Constitutionalists who ran under the GOP banner?
Clearly, the independents came over to the side of the GOP. But what is the overall breakdown?
Since 40% of the electorate considers itself a part of or in approval of the Tea Party, and since over 55% of Americans consider themselves to be Conservatives, one can logically assume that of all GOP voters, 80% or so were motivated by the ideological argument. Clearly, almost NONE of the GOP supporters were motivated by union affiliation. How many were motivated by the coolness argument, the promises argument, party ID, or race? That would be harder to sift out, because most all of the GOP’s candidates did not use these other arguments, or, if they did, few of the winners did.
In short, the 2010 mid-term elections were, largely, and demonstrably, the result of a mostly ideological argument for Popular Constitutionalism which the GOP leadership is compelled, ethically, to obey in all of its practices and policies going forward.
While the progressive journolists and their political allies will try and SAY GOP voters in the 2010 mid-terms were not motivated by ideology and were motivated by base motives, like race or the coolness argument, or even ignorance, the facts don’t bear this out. The Popular Constitutionalists who WON did not overtly or in any covert or indirect way make such appeals as were made by the Progressive Elite candidates who used race, union affiliation, party ID, the coolness argument, and the promises argument so often, and often exclusively, in their public communications.
The plain facts are clear- less than 20% of Americans embraced the Progressive Elitist Ideology, over 40% embraced the Popular Constitutionalist Ideology. Less than 25% of Americans gave support to Progressive Elitists because they wanted to see the Progressives fulfill promises of some kind for parochial reasons. More than 15% of Americans agreed that Popular Constitutionalism was in their interest for various reasons. IN SHORT- most Americans explicitly rejected the Progressive Elitist Ideology, while most embraced or accepted the Popular Constitutionalist Ideology!
Of course, the facts will not get in the way of progressive journolists who are just as happy to lie and make things up as to take any real morsel of controversy and turn it into a public crucifixion!
more on Election 2010 Results:
Election 2010, 2010 Election Results, Politics, Obama News, Obama Watch, GOP, democrats, Obamacare, Economy, Business News
Link report on Election 2010:
Election 2010 Results- GOP takes House, narrows Senate majority- Politics
GOP gains 7 Senate Seats, 64 House Seats, and 7 Governorships
Iowa Voters repeal activist judges who voted for gay marriage- Christian News
Iowa voters beat back the godless agenda by recalling activist, godless judges
Election 2010 referendum on Obamacare- message sent- gut it- Obama Watch
Boehner calls out Obamacare monstrosity- will action follow rhetoric?
Teaparty drives Election, diversity in GOP takeover of House, Governorships- Freedom News
Election 2010 Results- Dem supporters of Obamacare lose seats in GOP takeover
Dems who passed vote for Obamacare lost vote in 2010 election- 1 GOPer who voted for Obamacare also loses
Israel News, World News, Christian News, Hamas
US Consulate In Jerusalem Aids Hamas Collaborators
Caught Red-Handed Escorting A Hamas Collaborator Into Jewish Communities
In what is a clear violation of the internal sovereignty of a foreign country, US officials from the American consulate in Jerusalem were photographed escorting a leftist, pro-Arab activist named Hagit Ofran driving into Jewish communities and snapping pictures. US officials are unhappy with the internal policies of Israel, including allowing Jews to build homes in Jerusalem itself, although no such concerns exist where Arabs are building homes.
The anti-Jewish American policy is being enforced by a program of sending US diplomatic officials into Israel itself, escorted by leftist political activists, to take pictures and generally spy on Israeli communities. The information gathered is provided not only to official channels, and used to put political pressure on the elected government which is pursuing policies supported by their voters, but this information also ends up in the hands of radical leftist groups, fringe groups who are pro-Arab, and in the hands of Israel’s Arab enemies, like Hamas and Fatah.
The Peace Now activist, Peace Now is a pro-Arab, and anti-Jewish left-wing fringe group operating in Israel, was photographed in her car being officially escorted by a US consulate vehicle. Both vehicles were seen stopping, with their occupants, including the Peace Now activist and the US officials, talking and taking pictures of details of the communities in question. Access to some of these communities is restricted to member only, for security reasons, and the Peace Now activist would not normally gain entrance, however under a protocol the US has apparently established with Jerusalem, US officials are permitted inside these communities and they are using their diplomatic access to spy in Jews and to provide a means for political activists who oppose the settlements and who collaborate with groups like Fatah and Hamas, to gain access.
read more about this story at : http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139904
Freedom News, Liberal Jihadist, David Green, Politics, University of Illinois, Anti-Colonialism, Anti-American Propaganda, Racist, Genocide, Progressive
Patriotism is Racism and genocidal endorsement, so says Liberal Jihadist and University of Illinois Professor- Freedom News
William R Collier Jr
Alumni Denounce University of Illinois Anti-American Propaganda-
David Green Comes Out With The Anti-Colonialism Agenda of The University of Illinois
Parents, students, and American Patriots who do not buy into a neo-Marxist/anti-colonialism worldview are incensed that a member of the University of Illinois administration is parroting the lies and propaganda used by America’s enemies to recruit people into terror cells.
The administration staff member, from the University of Illinois, denounced college students for chanting “USA, USA, USA!” during a 911 observance at a college football game, accusing what he called “the mostly white” and “privileged” crowd of murder and imperialism.
FIGHT BACK and help us expose WHO is behind this Liberal Jihadist! GO HERE NOW!
Describing himself as a “University Academic Professional”, David Green made his anti-American pronouncements on dailyilini.com, where commentators revealed that he is a research assistant: Green, David L Institute of Govt & Pub Affairs — University Administration
[email protected] RESEARCH AND POLICY SPEC, Institute of Govt & Pub Affairs — University Administration
Reaction from angry alumni has been swift and strong, with many saying they will not be donating any more money to their alma mater until Green is, as one commentator put it, “dealt with by the administration.”
One commentator, embarrassed that the Daily Illini, a student run newspaper, would publish such patently hateful and deceptive comments, said:
“What an embarrassment that the DI actually put this garbage up for people to see. A student newspaper since 1871, and they print this trash that probably wouldn’t even get a hit on the National enquirer…..I think the comments here by others already sum up what a compete jackass you look like Mr. Green….. I hope you enjoy the hits you’re probably getting on this piece, because after this I have a feeling a whole lot of people are not going to be clicking on or reading your nonsense.”
While the Daily Illini is a student run newspaper, Green, who is not a professor but who represented himself as a University Academic Professional, and who is part of the administration, could very well be representing the equivalent of the “editorial policy” of the department he works within as a “research and policy specialist.” Considering his radical anti-colonialism views, which mirror President Obama’s father, the President, and Senate hopeful Chris Coons, the question left unanswered is: does the University of Illinois use taxpayer dollars and parent’s tuition money to fund the sort of research and policy that leads to such anti-American hate speech? Additionally, does such a policy tend to create an environment of anti-Americanism as would encourage students to join terrorist organizations?
FIGHT BACK and help us expose WHO is behind this Liberal Jihadist! GO HERE NOW!
Green’s semi-official policy statement read, in part,
“The overwhelmingly white, privileged, Block-I students should be ashamed of their obnoxious, fake-macho, chicken-hawk chant, while poverty-drafted members of their cohort fight and die in illegal and immoral wars for the control of oil. University administrators need to eliminate from all events such ‘patriotic’ observances, which in this country cannot be separated from implicit justifications for state-sponsored killing.”
The Freedomist wants to know: is this statement reflective of the policies of the University and would an audit of this man’s work reveal that US taxpayers are paying for this kind of anti-American hate speech?
Beyond this, does YOUR candidate for Congress agree with this statement by David Green or are they willing to cut off funding from this so-called “University” until it rids its administration of terrorist-inspiring hate speech like this?
FIGHT BACK and help us expose WHO is behind this Liberal Jihadist! GO HERE NOW!
Have any doubts about David Green being a Liberal Jihadist? Check this story out:
David Green, Liberal Jihadist of University of Illinois, declares Holocaust a fraud
How David Green, the now infamous Acadaemic Professional of the University of Illinois who stated Americans were racists and murderour haters for chanting “USA”, is also an anti-semite. Here are his own words
The Holocaust Industry Comes to the University of Illinois
By DAVID GREEN
In his 2000 book The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, scholar and critic Norman Finkelstein convincingly argues three general points. First, since the 1967 war and Israel’s military alliance with the United States, the Nazi holocaust-a historical event-has become the Holocaust, a narrow and ideologically-driven Zionist interpretation of that genocide that has been used to justify Israeli and American policies, and aggrandize Jewish-American elites in the halls of power. Second, and concurrently since 1967, a Holocaust literature has evolved apart from credible historical scholarship about the Nazi holocaust, the former which is without scholarly merit and is often fraudulent. Holocaust literature, most notably that of Elie Wiesel, has propagated specious notions of the “uniqueness” of the Holocaust and the eternal nature of anti-Semitism, both of which serve to silence criticism of Israel. Third, Finkelstein elaborated the evidence for a “double shakedown” during the late 1990s by which both survivors of the Nazi holocaust and European governments (primarily Switzerland) were exploited by Jewish organizations seeking exorbitant amounts of monetary compensation, while being held to standards far beyond those to which either the U.S. or Israel has been held in relation to the bank holdings of survivors.
Here is a story about how remembering 9/11 victims is also racist, according to this rabid Liberal Jihadist now teaching your children how to think about their own country:
Liberal Jihadist calls 9/11 memorials Racist and inducing genocide
David Green, Liberal Jihadist and “Academic Proffessional” of The University of Illinois, writes a letter calling Americans RACIST for commemorating 9/11
read more about this Liberal Jihadist that teaches your children America is the Great Satan:
IN his own words:
Just read this letter written by David Green, and if you have been able to stomach it, I’ll have commentary at the bottom:
The vast majority of 9/11 observances in this country cannot be seen as politically neutral events. Implicit in their nature are the notions that lives lost at the World Trade Center are more valuable than lives lost in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine and elsewhere; that the motives of the 9/11 attackers had nothing to do with genuine grievances in the Islamic world regarding American imperialism; and that the U.S. has been justified in the subsequent killing of hundreds of thousands in so-called retaliation.
The observance at Saturday’s football game was no different. A moment of silence was followed by a military airplane flyover; in between, Block-I students chanted “USA, USA.” This was neither patriotism nor remembrance in any justifiable sense, but politicization, militarism, propaganda and bellicosity. The University is a public institution that encompasses the political views of all, not just the most (falsely) “patriotic.” Athletic planners should cease such exploitation for political purposes. They might at least consider how most Muslim students, American or otherwise, would respond to this nativist display; or better, Muslims and others that live their lives under the threat of our planes, drones and soldiers.
Read His Anti-semitic views on the Holocaust:
David Green, Liberal Jihadist of University of Illinois, declares Holocaust a fraud
FIGHT BACK and help us expose WHO is behind this Liberal Jihadist! GO HERE NOW!